Arsenic contamination of groundwater

Last updated
Groundwater arsenic contamination areas Arsenic contamination areas.png
Groundwater arsenic contamination areas

Arsenic contamination of groundwater is a form of groundwater pollution which is often due to naturally occurring high concentrations of arsenic in deeper levels of groundwater. It is a high-profile problem due to the use of deep tube wells for water supply in the Ganges Delta, causing serious arsenic poisoning to large numbers of people. A 2007 study found that over 137 million people in more than 70 countries are probably affected by arsenic poisoning of drinking water. The problem became a serious health concern after mass poisoning of water in Bangladesh. [1] Arsenic contamination of ground water is found in many countries throughout the world, including the US. [2]

Contents

The World Health Organization recommends limiting arsenic concentrations in water to 10 μg/L, although this is often an unattainable goal for many problem areas due to the difficult nature of removing arsenic from water sources. [3]

Approximately 20 major incidents of groundwater arsenic contamination have been reported. [4] Of these, four major incidents occurred in Asia—in Bangladesh; West Bengal, India; Inner Mongolia, China; and Taiwan. [5] Locations of potentially hazardous wells have been mapped in China. [6]

Sources

Gold mining can contaminate groundwater with arsenic, because the element typically occurs in gold-containing ores. Gold processing releases arsenic from mine tailings, and contaminated groundwater may be unsafe to drink for decades. [7] Arsenic that is naturally occurring can contaminate the soil, just as it does the groundwater. This presents a possible arsenic exposure by use of products containing tobacco, because the tobacco plant grows from the soil and can become infiltrated with the arsenic. [3]

Speciation of arsenic compounds in water

Arsenic contaminated water typically contains arsenous acid and arsenic acid or their derivatives. Their names as "acids" is a formality; these species are not aggressive acids but are merely the soluble forms of arsenic near neutral pH. These compounds are extracted from the underlying rocks that surround the aquifer. Arsenic acid tends to exist as the ions [HAsO4]2− and [H2AsO4]− in neutral water, whereas arsenous acid is not ionized.

Arsenate.svg
Arsenous-acid-2D.svg
Arsenic acid (H3AsO4), arsenous acid (H3AsO3) and their derivatives are typically encountered in arsenic contaminated ground water.

Contamination in specific nations and regions

This person displays some of the symptoms of arsenic poisoning through contaminated water. Arsenic Poisoning.jpg
This person displays some of the symptoms of arsenic poisoning through contaminated water.

South America

An analysis of water and food consumption in Socaire, a rural village in Chile, found that between November 2008 and September 2009, the total intake of arsenic by the villagers correlated with the amount of water and local produce consumed. [8]

The central portion of Argentina is affected by arsenic-contaminated groundwater. Specifically, the La Pampa produces water containing 4–5300 microgram per liter. [9]

South Asia

Bangladesh

This section is an excerpt from Water supply and sanitation in Bangladesh § Arsenic contamination of groundwater.[ edit ]

Arsenic contamination of the groundwater in Bangladesh is a serious problem. Prior to the 1970s, Bangladesh had one of the highest infant mortality rates in the world. Ineffective water purification and sewage systems as well as periodic monsoons and flooding exacerbated these problems. As a solution, UNICEF and the World Bank advocated the use of wells to tap into deeper groundwater. During the 1970s, UNICEF worked with the Department of Public Health Engineering to install tube-wells. The wells consist of tubes 5 cm in diameter inserted less than 200 m into the ground and capped with an iron or steel hand pump. At that time, standard water testing procedures did not include arsenic testing. [10] This lack of precaution led to one of the largest mass poisoning of a population because the ground water used for drinking was contaminated with arsenic. [11]

Tube-wells were supposed to draw water from underground aquifers to provide a safe source of water for the nation. Millions of wells were constructed as a result. In 1993 it was discovered that groundwater in large parts of Bangladesh was naturally contaminated with arsenic. [12] [13] : 389  The issue came to international attention in 1995. [14] [15]

In the Ganges Delta, the affected wells are typically more than 20 meters and less than 100 meters deep. [16] Groundwater closer to the surface typically has spent a shorter time in the ground, therefore likely absorbing a lower concentration of arsenic; water deeper than 100 meters is exposed to much older sediments which have already been depleted of arsenic. [17]

Criticism has been leveled at the aid agencies, who denied the problem during the 1990s while millions of tube wells were sunk. The aid agencies later hired foreign experts who recommended treatment plants that were inappropriate to the conditions, were regularly breaking down, or were not removing the arsenic. [18]

India

In Bihar, groundwater in 13 districts have been found to be contaminated with arsenic with quantities exceeding 0.05 mg/L. All these districts are situated close to large rivers like Ganga and Gandak. [19]

In West Bengal, India, water is mostly supplied from rivers, open wells, or ponds. These may be contaminated with communicable diseases such as dysentery, typhoid, cholera, and hepatitis. Since the 1970s, non-governmental organisations in India have focused on sinking tube wells to provide drinking water uncontaminated by diseases, with the unforeseen side effect of exposing some people to arsenic-contaminated groundwater. [20] [21]

Nepal

Nepal is subject to a serious problem with arsenic contamination. The problem is most severe in the Terai region, the worst being near Nawalparasi District, where 26 percent of shallow wells failed to meet WHO standard of 10 ppb. A study by Japan International Cooperation Agency and the Environment in the Kathmandu Valley showed that 72% of deep wells failed to meet the WHO standard, and 12% failed to meet the Nepali standard of 50 ppb. [22]

Pakistan

66% of 1200 samples tested contained arsenic above WHO recommended limit, threatening over 60 million residents. 50–60 million residents consume water with arsenic levels greater than 50 micrograms of arsenic per liter, levels far passing acceptable levels worldwide. [23]

United States

Regulation

A drinking water standard of 0.05 mg/L (equal to 50 parts per billion, or ppb) arsenic was originally established in the United States by the Public Health Service in 1942. After the passage of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (SDWA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was given the power to set the maximum containment levels (MCLs) of contaminants in public water supplies. In 1996 Congress amended the SDWA and created a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund to provide loans for water supply improvements, which increased the EPA's power to set mandates. This amendment created the "costs and benefits rule" to determine whether the cost of implementing new MCLs outweighs the health benefits. To maximize the costs and benefits of setting new MLCs, the EPA began allowing more affordable technology to be substituted that did not fully meet MLC standards because it was more affordable.

The EPA studied the pros and cons of lowering the arsenic MCL for years in the late 1980s and 1990s. No action was taken until January 2001, when the Clinton administration in its final weeks promulgated a new standard of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) to take effect January 2006. [24] The Bush administration suspended the midnight regulation, but after some months of study, the new EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman approved the new 10 ppb arsenic standard and its original effective date of January 2006. [25] Many locations exceed this limit. [26] A 2017 Lancet Public Health study found that this rule change led to fewer cancer deaths. [27] [28]

Many public water supply systems across the United States obtained their water supply from groundwater that had met the old 50 ppb arsenic standard but exceeded the new 10 ppb MCL. These utilities searched for either an alternative supply or an inexpensive treatment method to remove the arsenic from their water. In Arizona, an estimated 35 percent of water-supply wells were put out of compliance by the new regulation; in California, the percentage was 38 percent. [29]

The proper arsenic MCL continues to be debated. Some have argued that the 10 ppb federal standard is still too high, while others have argued that 10 ppb is needlessly strict. Individual states can establish lower arsenic limits; New Jersey has done so, setting a maximum of 0.005 mg/L (5 ppb) for arsenic in drinking water. [30]

A study of private water wells in the Appalachian mountains found that six percent of the wells had arsenic above the U.S. MCL of 0.010 mg/L. [31]

Case studies and incidents

Fallon, Nevada has long been known to have groundwater with relatively high arsenic concentrations (in excess of 0.08 mg/L). [32] Even some surface waters, such as the Verde River in Arizona, sometimes exceed 0.01 mg/L arsenic, especially during low-flow periods when the river flow is dominated by groundwater discharge. [33]

A study conducted in a contiguous six-county area of southeastern Michigan investigated the relationship between moderate arsenic levels and 23 disease outcomes. Disease outcomes included several types of cancer, diseases of the circulatory and respiratory system, diabetes mellitus, and kidney and liver diseases. Elevated mortality rates were observed for all diseases of the circulatory system. The researchers acknowledged a need to replicate their findings. [34]

Various studies have also shown that arsenic exposure during pregnancy can result in infant death, cancer, heart attacks, kidney failure, lung complications, as well as reduced intelligence, memory, and cognitive development in the child. [3]

Water purification solutions

Access to clean drinking water is fraught with political, socio-economic, and cultural inequities. In practice, many water treatment strategies tend to be temporary fixes to a larger problem, often prolonging the social issues while treating the scientific ones. [35] Scientific studies have shown that interdisciplinary approaches to water purification are especially important to consider, and long-lasting improvements involve larger perspectives than strict scientific approaches. [36]

Small-scale water treatment

A review of methods to remove arsenic from groundwater in Pakistan summarizes the most technically viable inexpensive methods. [37] Most small-scale treatments focus on water after it has left the distribution site, and are thus more focused on quick, temporary fixes.

A simpler and less expensive form of arsenic removal is known as the Sono arsenic filter, using three pitchers containing cast iron turnings and sand in the first pitcher and wood activated carbon and sand in the second. [38] Plastic buckets can also be used as filter containers. [39] It is claimed that thousands of these systems are in use and can last for years while avoiding the toxic waste disposal problem inherent to conventional arsenic removal plants. Although novel, this filter has not been certified by any sanitary standards such as NSF, ANSI, WQA and does not avoid toxic waste disposal similar to any other iron removal process.

In the United States small "under the sink" units have been used to remove arsenic from drinking water. This option is called "point of use" treatment. The most common types of domestic treatment use the technologies of adsorption (using media such as Bayoxide E33, GFH, activated alumina or titanium dioxide) [40] or reverse osmosis. Ion exchange and activated alumina have been considered but not commonly used.

Chaff-based filters have been reported to reduce the arsenic content of water to 3 μg/L (3 ppb). This is especially important in areas where the potable water is provided by filtering the water extracted from the underground aquifer. [41]

In iron electrocoagulation (Fe-EC), iron is dissolved nonstop using electricity, and the resulting ferric hydroxides, oxyhydroxides, and oxides form an absorbent readily attracted to arsenic. Current density, the amount of charge delivered per liter of water, of the process is often manipulated in order to achieve maximum arsenic depletion. [42] This treatment strategy has primarily been used in Bangladesh, [43] and has proven to be largely successful. In fact, using iron electrocoagulation to remove arsenic in water proved to be the most effective treatment option. [44]

Large-scale water treatment

In some places, such as the United States, all the water supplied to residences by utilities must meet primary (health-based) drinking water standards. Regulations may require large-scale treatment systems to remove arsenic from the water supply. The effectiveness of any method depends on the chemical makeup of a particular water supply. The aqueous chemistry of arsenic is complex, and may affect the removal rate that can be achieved by a particular process.

Some large utilities with multiple water supply wells could shut down those wells with high arsenic concentrations, and produce only from wells or surface water sources that meet the arsenic standard. Other utilities, however, especially small utilities with only a few wells, may have no available water supply that meets the arsenic standard.

Coagulation/filtration (also known as flocculation) removes arsenic by coprecipitation and adsorption using iron coagulants. Coagulation/filtration using alum is already used by some utilities to remove suspended solids and may be adjusted to remove arsenic. [45]

Iron oxide adsorption filters the water through a granular medium containing ferric oxide. Ferric oxide has a high affinity for adsorbing dissolved metals such as arsenic. The iron oxide medium eventually becomes saturated, and must be replaced. The sludge disposal is a problem here too.

Activated alumina is an adsorbent that effectively removes arsenic. Activated alumina columns connected to shallow tube wells in India and Bangladesh have removed both As(III) and As(V) from groundwater for decades. Long-term column performance has been possible through the efforts of community-elected water committees that collect a local water tax for funding operations and maintenance. [46] It has also been used to remove undesirably high concentrations of fluoride.

Ion exchange has long been used as a water softening process, although usually on a single-home basis. Traditional anion exchange resins are effective in removing As(V), but not As(III), or arsenic trioxide, which doesn't have a net charge. Effective long-term ion exchange removal of arsenic requires a trained operator to maintain the column.

Both reverse osmosis and electrodialysis (also called electrodialysis reversal) can remove arsenic with a net ionic charge. (Note that arsenic oxide, As2O3, is a common form of arsenic in groundwater that is soluble, but has no net charge.) Some utilities presently use one of these methods to reduce total dissolved solids and therefore improve taste. A problem with both methods is the production of high-salinity waste water, called brine, or concentrate, which then must be disposed of.

Subterranean arsenic removal (SAR) technology SAR Technology

In subterranean arsenic removal, aerated groundwater is recharged back into the aquifer to create an oxidation zone which can trap iron and arsenic on the soil particles through adsorption process. The oxidation zone created by aerated water boosts the activity of the arsenic-oxidizing microorganisms which can oxidize arsenic from +3 to +5 state SAR Technology. No chemicals are used and almost no sludge is produced during operational stage since iron and arsenic compounds are rendered inactive in the aquifer itself. Thus toxic waste disposal and the risk of its future mobilization is prevented. Also, it has very long operational life, similar to the long lasting tube wells drawing water from the shallow aquifers.

Six such SAR plants, funded by the World Bank and constructed by Ramakrishna Vivekananda Mission, Barrackpore & Queen's University Belfast, UK are operating in West Bengal. Each plant has been delivering more than 3,000 liters of arsenic and iron-free water daily to the rural community. The first community water treatment plant based on SAR technology was set up at Kashimpore near Kolkata in 2004 by a team of European and Indian engineers led by Bhaskar Sen Gupta of Queen's University Belfast for TiPOT. [47] [48] [49] [50]

SAR technology had been awarded Dhirubhai Ambani Award, 2010 from IChemE UK for Chemical Innovation. Again, SAR was the winner of the St. Andrews Award for Environment, 2010. The SAR Project was selected by the Blacksmith Institute – New York & Green Cross- Switzerland as one of the "12 Cases of Cleanup & Success" in the World's Worst Polluted Places Report 2009. (Refer: www.worstpolluted.org).

Currently, large scale SAR plants are being installed in US, Malaysia, Cambodia, and Vietnam.

Nanotechnology based arsenic remediation

Using nanomaterials, it is possible to effectively destroy microorganisms, adsorb arsenic and fluoride, remove heavy metals and degrade pesticides usually found in water. [51] [52] Researchers have looked at new methods to synthesize iron oxide/hydroxide/oxyhydroxide compositions in the laboratory and used them for water purification. A product called AMRIT, meaning elixir in Indian languages, developed by the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, is an affordable water purification technology based on advanced materials, which has been validated through research articles [53] [54] and patents [55] and has been approved for national implementation in India. The technology can remove several anions, especially arsenate and arsenite (two common species present in arsenic-contaminated water) and fluoride from water. Currently, this technology is delivering arsenic-free water to about 10,00,000 people every day. [56]

Research

Mapping

In 2008, the Swiss Aquatic Research Institute, Eawag, presented a new method by which hazard maps could be produced for geogenic toxic substances in groundwater. [57] [58] [59] [60] This provides an efficient way of determining which wells should be tested. In 2016, the research group made its knowledge freely available on the Groundwater Assessment Platform (GAP). This offers specialists worldwide the possibility of uploading their own measurement data, visually displaying them and producing risk maps for areas of their choice. GAP also serves as a knowledge-sharing forum for enabling further development of methods for removing toxic substances from water.

Dietary intake

Researchers from Bangladesh and the United Kingdom have claimed that dietary intake of arsenic adds a significant amount to total intake where contaminated water is used for irrigation. [61] [62] [63]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arsenic</span> Chemical element, symbol As and atomic number 33

Arsenic is a chemical element; it has symbol As and atomic number 33. Arsenic occurs in many minerals, usually in combination with sulfur and metals, but also as a pure elemental crystal. Arsenic is a metalloid. It has various allotropes, but only the grey form, which has a metallic appearance, is important to industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arsenic poisoning</span> Illness from ingesting arsenic

Arsenic poisoning is a medical condition that occurs due to elevated levels of arsenic in the body. If arsenic poisoning occurs over a brief period of time, symptoms may include vomiting, abdominal pain, encephalopathy, and watery diarrhea that contains blood. Long-term exposure can result in thickening of the skin, darker skin, abdominal pain, diarrhea, heart disease, numbness, and cancer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drinking water</span> Water safe for consumption

Drinking water or potable water is water that is safe for ingestion, either when drunk directly in liquid form or consumed indirectly through food preparation. It is often supplied through taps in which case it is also called tap water. Typically in developed countries, tap water meets drinking water quality standards, even though only a small proportion is actually consumed or used in food preparation. Other typical uses for tap water include washing, toilets, and irrigation. Greywater may also be used for toilets or irrigation. Its use for irrigation however may be associated with risks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental remediation</span> Removal of pollution from soil, groundwater etc.

Environmental remediation is the cleanup of hazardous substances dealing with the removal, treatment and containment of pollution or contaminants from environmental media such as soil, groundwater, sediment. Remediation may be required by regulations before development of land revitalization projects. Developers who agree to voluntary cleanup may be offered incentives under state or municipal programs like New York State's Brownfield Cleanup Program. If remediation is done by removal the waste materials are simply transported off-site for disposal at another location. The waste material can also be contained by physical barriers like slurry walls. The use of slurry walls is well-established in the construction industry. The application of (low) pressure grouting, used to mitigate soil liquefaction risks in San Francisco and other earthquake zones, has achieved mixed results in field tests to create barriers, and site-specific results depend upon many variable conditions that can greatly impact outcomes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bioremediation</span> Process used to treat contaminated media such as water and soil

Bioremediation broadly refers to any process wherein a biological system, living or dead, is employed for removing environmental pollutants from air, water, soil, flue gasses, industrial effluents etc., in natural or artificial settings. The natural ability of organisms to adsorb, accumulate, and degrade common and emerging pollutants has attracted the use of biological resources in treatment of contaminated environment. In comparison to conventional physicochemical treatment methods bioremediation may offer considerable advantages as it aims to be sustainable, eco-friendly, cheap, and scalable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rocky Mountain Arsenal</span> Former U.S. Army chemical weapons manufacturing site

The Rocky Mountain Arsenal was a United States chemical weapons manufacturing center located in the Denver Metropolitan Area in Commerce City, Colorado. The site was completed December 1942, operated by the United States Army throughout the later 20th century and was controversial among local residents until its closure in 1992.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hexavalent chromium</span> Chromium in the +6 oxidation state

Hexavalent chromium (chromium(VI), Cr(VI), chromium 6) is chromium in any chemical compound that contains the element in the +6 oxidation state (thus hexavalent). The hexavalent form rarely occurs naturally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soil contamination</span> Pollution of land by human-made chemicals or other alteration

Soil contamination, soil pollution, or land pollution as a part of land degradation is caused by the presence of xenobiotic (human-made) chemicals or other alteration in the natural soil environment. It is typically caused by industrial activity, agricultural chemicals or improper disposal of waste. The most common chemicals involved are petroleum hydrocarbons, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, solvents, pesticides, lead, and other heavy metals. Contamination is correlated with the degree of industrialization and intensity of chemical substance. The concern over soil contamination stems primarily from health risks, from direct contact with the contaminated soil, vapour from the contaminants, or from secondary contamination of water supplies within and underlying the soil. Mapping of contaminated soil sites and the resulting clean ups are time-consuming and expensive tasks, and require expertise in geology, hydrology, chemistry, computer modelling, and GIS in Environmental Contamination, as well as an appreciation of the history of industrial chemistry.

The Sono arsenic filter was invented in 2006 by Abul Hussam, who is a chemistry professor at George Mason University (GMU) in Fairfax, Virginia. It was developed to deal with the problem of arsenic contamination of groundwater. The filter is now in use in Hussam's native Bangladesh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Bangladesh</span>

Bangladesh is faced with multiple water quality and quantity problems along with regular natural disasters, such as cyclones and floods. Available options for providing safe drinking water include tubewells, traditionally dug wells, treatment of surface water, desalination of groundwater with high salinity levels and rainwater harvesting.

Drinking water quality in the United States is generally safe. In 2016, over 90 percent of the nation's community water systems were in compliance with all published U.S. Environmental Protection Agency standards. Over 286 million Americans get their tap water from a community water system. Eight percent of the community water systems—large municipal water systems—provide water to 82 percent of the US population. The Safe Drinking Water Act requires the US EPA to set standards for drinking water quality in public water systems. Enforcement of the standards is mostly carried out by state health agencies. States may set standards that are more stringent than the federal standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances</span> Class of perfluorinated chemical compounds

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS or PFASs) are a group of synthetic organofluorine chemical compounds that have multiple fluorine atoms attached to an alkyl chain. An early definition, from 2011, required that they contain at least one perfluoroalkyl moiety, –CnF2n+1–. Beginning in 2021, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) expanded their terminology, stating that "PFASs are defined as fluorinated substances that contain at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom (without any H/Cl/Br/I atom attached to it), i.e., with a few noted exceptions, any chemical with at least a perfluorinated methyl group (–CF3) or a perfluorinated methylene group (–CF2–) is a PFAS."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hinkley groundwater contamination</span> Human-caused environmental event in the US

From 1952 to 1966, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) dumped about 370 million gallons of chromium-tainted wastewater into unlined wastewater spreading ponds around the town of Hinkley, California, located in the Mojave Desert about 120 miles north-northeast of Los Angeles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Koppers Co., Inc. Superfund Site</span>

The Koppers Co., Inc. (KCI) Superfund Site is one of three Superfund sites in Oroville, California, along with Louisiana Pacific Sawmill and Western Pacific Railyard. The KCI Superfund Site is a 200-acre site which served as a wood treatment plant for 50 years. Wood was treated with many chemicals to prevent wood deterioration. The accumulation of these chemicals from spills, fires, and uses has caused this site to be contaminated with the hazardous waste material. Due to soil and groundwater contamination, the site was placed on the National Priorities List in 1984 for remedial action plans to clean up the site to protect surrounding residential areas concerning environmental and human health risks.

Air sparging, also known as in situ air stripping and in situ volatilization is an in situ remediation technique, used for the treatment of saturated soils and groundwater contaminated by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like petroleum hydrocarbons, a widespread problem for the ground water and soil health. Vapor extraction has become a very successful and practical method of VOC remediation. In saturated zone remediation, air sparging refers to the injection a hydrocarbon-free gaseous medium into the ground where contamination has been found. When it comes to situ air sparging it became an intricate phase process that was proven to be successful in Europe since the 1980s. Currently, there have been further developments into bettering the engineering design and process of air sparging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Groundwater pollution</span> Ground released seep into groundwater

Groundwater pollution occurs when pollutants are released to the ground and make their way into groundwater. This type of water pollution can also occur naturally due to the presence of a minor and unwanted constituent, contaminant, or impurity in the groundwater, in which case it is more likely referred to as contamination rather than pollution. Groundwater pollution can occur from on-site sanitation systems, landfill leachate, effluent from wastewater treatment plants, leaking sewers, petrol filling stations, hydraulic fracturing (fracking) or from over application of fertilizers in agriculture. Pollution can also occur from naturally occurring contaminants, such as arsenic or fluoride. Using polluted groundwater causes hazards to public health through poisoning or the spread of disease.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental issues in Bangladesh</span>

Bangladesh, with an area of 147,570 km2, features a flood plain landscape and several river systems throughout the country. This landscape provides the major natural resources of water, land, fisheries, forests, and wildlife. The country currently faces several environmental issues which threaten these resources, including groundwater metal contamination, increased groundwater salinity, cyclones and flooding, and sedimentation and changing patterns of stream flow due to watershed mismanagement. Some of these, such as the changing patterns of stream flow and presence of lead in groundwater, can be directly correlated with human activity and industrial processes, while others, such as cyclones and flooding are naturally occurring issues. Many of these issues are further exacerbated by climate change, which causes increased occurrence of storms and cyclones and rising sea levels. According to the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index, Bangladesh is the 43rd most vulnerable country to the effects of climate change, and the 37th least prepared country to address these effects. There has been some government actions taken to address these issues.

The A.O. Polymer manufacturing site is located in Sparta Township, New Jersey. This facility created special polymers, plastics, and resins. It was also used for reclaiming spent solvents. The facility's poor waste handling led to serious contamination of the ground. It also contaminated the water in the ground with volatile organic compounds. The site has been a threat to the Allentown aquifer, which provides drinking water to over 5,000 people. Initial clean ups started with getting rid of old drums and contaminants from their original disposal area. The company took them and decided to dispose of them elsewhere, thus not fixing the problem. Primary cleanups of the site were ongoing as of 2008. The EPA has been using water pumps to remove contaminants from the water in the ground. A soil extraction system has been put at their disposal to remove harmful contamination within the soil as well. All wells in the affected areas have been closed.

The Dorado Ground Water Contamination Site is one of 18 sites listed on the EPA’s National Priorities List in Puerto Rico, a territory of the United States, identified as posing a risk to human health and/or the environment because of a contamination plume in the underlying karst aquifer. Located in north-central Puerto Rico, 20 mi (32 km) to the west of the capital city, San Juan, the Dorado Ground Water Contamination site is located within the Maguayo and Dorado Urbano public water systems, and is the source of drinking water for more than 67,000 people. This site first came under scrutiny by officials in the 1980s and it was officially added to the EPA's Superfund list on September 9, 2016. The EPA is in the process of examining the precise extent and location of this contaminated groundwater plume and, at this time, the contaminants cannot be attributed to any specific source. In the wake of Hurricane Maria, the site has come under increased scrutiny because locals desperate for a source of safe drinking water have been using wells on the superfund site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Janet Hering</span> US-American biochemist

Janet Gordon Hering is the former Director of the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology and Professor emeritus of Biogeochemistry at ETH Zurich and EPFL. She works on the biogeochemical cycling of trace elements in water and the management of water infrastructure.

References

  1. ↑ See:
  2. ↑ Smedley, PL; Kinniburgh, DG (2002). "A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters" (PDF). Applied Geochemistry. 17 (5): 517–568. Bibcode:2002ApGC...17..517S. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5. S2CID   55596829.
  3. 1 2 3 "Arsenic". www.who.int. Retrieved 2020-11-28.
  4. ↑ Mukherjee A.; Sengupta M. K.; Hossain M. A. (2006). "Arsenic contamination in groundwater: A global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario". Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition. 24 (2): 142–163. JSTOR   23499353. PMID   17195556.
  5. ↑ Chowdhury U. K.; Biswas B. K.; Chowdhury T. R. (2000). "Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India". Environmental Health Perspectives. 108 (4): 393–397. doi:10.2307/3454378. JSTOR   3454378. PMC   1638054 . PMID   10811564.
  6. ↑ Rodríguez-Lado L.; Sun G.; Berg M.; Zhang Q.; Xue H.; Zheng Q.; Johnson C.A. (2013). "Groundwater arsenic contamination throughout China". Science. 341 (6148): 866–868. Bibcode:2013Sci...341..866R. doi:10.1126/science.1237484. PMID   23970694. S2CID   206548777.
  7. ↑ Eisler, Ronald (2004), "Arsenic Hazards to Humans, Plants, and Animals from Gold Mining", Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 180, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 133–165, doi:10.1007/0-387-21729-0_3, ISBN   978-0-387-21729-1, PMID   14561078 , retrieved 2023-06-12
  8. ↑ Diaz, Oscar Pablo; Arcos, Rafael; Tapia, Yasna; Pastene, Rubén; Velez, Dínoraz; Devesa, Vicenta; Montoro, Rosa; Aguilera, Valeska; Becerra, Miriam (2015-05-22). "Estimation of Arsenic Intake from Drinking Water and Food (Raw and Cooked) in a Rural Village of Northern Chile. Urine as a Biomarker of Recent Exposure". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 12 (5): 5614–5633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120505614 . PMC   4454988 . PMID   26006131.
  9. ↑ Smedley P.L.; Kinniburgh D.G.; Macdonald D.M.J.; Nicolli H.B.; Barros A.J.; Tullio J.O.; Pearce J.M.; Alonso M.S. (2005). "Arsenic associations in sediments from the loess aquifer of La Pampa, Argentina". Applied Geochemistry. 20 (5): 989–1016. Bibcode:2005ApGC...20..989S. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.10.005.
  10. ↑ Smith AH, Lingas EO, Rahman M. "Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency." Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2000, 78-87.
  11. ↑ Khan AW et al. "Arsenic contamination in groundwater and its effect on human health with particular reference to Bangladesh." Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine. 1997. 16, 65-73.
  12. ↑ The World Bank (December 2005). Bangladesh Country Water Resources Assistance Strategy (PDF) (Report). The World Bank. Retrieved 21 April 2008.
  13. ↑ Das Gupta, Ashim; Babel, Mukund Singh; Albert, Xavier; Mark, Ole (June 2005). "Water Sector of Bangladesh in the Context of Integrated Water Resources Management: A Review". International Journal of Water Resources Development. Routledge. 21 (2): 385–398. doi:10.1080/07900620500037818. S2CID   154569673.
  14. ↑ Amit Chatterjee; Dipankar Das; Badal K. Mandal; Tarit Roy Chowdhury; Gautam Samanta; Dipankar Chakraborti (1995). "Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part I. Arsenic species in drinking water and urine of the affected people". Analyst. 120 (3): 643–651. Bibcode:1995Ana...120..643C. doi:10.1039/AN9952000643.
  15. ↑ Dipankar Das; Amit Chatterjee; Badal K. Mandal; Gautam Samanta; Dipankar Chakraborti; Bhabatosh Chanda (1995). "Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part 2. Arsenic concentration in drinking water, hair, nails, urine, skin-scale and liver tissue (biopsy) of the affected people". Analyst. 120 (3): 917–925. Bibcode:1995Ana...120..917D. doi:10.1039/AN9952000917. PMID   7741255.
  16. ↑ D. G. Kinniburgh; P. L. Smedley (2001). Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. Keyworth: British Geological Survey. ISBN   0-85272-384-9. OCLC   50945325.
  17. ↑ Singh A. K. (2006). "Chemistry of arsenic in groundwater of Ganges-Brahmaputra river basin" (PDF). Current Science . 91 (5): 599–606. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-05. Retrieved 2012-10-25.
  18. ↑ New Scientist, Interview: Drinking at the west's toxic well 31 May 2006.
  19. ↑ "Groundwater in 13 Districts of Bihar contaminated with Arsenic". Biharprabha News. Retrieved 25 September 2013.
  20. ↑ World Health Organization, Arsenic in Drinking Water, accessed 8 November 2021.
  21. ↑ The Times of India, 'Use surface water. Stop digging', interview, 26 September 2004.
  22. ↑ "Nepal: Filters to provide arsenic-free drinking water — OWSA: OneWorld South Asia - Latest news on sustainable development, features, opinions, interviews with NGO leaders and..." Archived from the original on 2012-08-04. Retrieved 2011-01-19.
  23. ↑ "Arsenic in drinking water threatens up to 60 million in Pakistan". Science | AAAS. 2017-08-23. Retrieved 11 September 2017.
  24. ↑ The history of arsenic regulation, Southwest Hydrology, May/June 2002, p.16.
  25. ↑ EPA announces arsenic standard for drinking water of 10 parts per billion, EPA press release, 10/31/2001.
  26. ↑ Twarakavi, N. K. C.; Kaluarachchi, J. J. (2006). "Arsenic in the shallow ground waters of conterminous United States: assessment, health risks, and costs for MCL compliance". Journal of American Water Resources Association. 42 (2): 275–294. Bibcode:2006JAWRA..42..275T. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb03838.x. S2CID   131084177. Archived from the original on 5 January 2013.
  27. ↑ Bakalar, Nicholas (2017-10-24). "Arsenic Reductions in Drinking Water Tied to Fewer Cancer Deaths". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2017-10-26.
  28. ↑ Nigra, Anne E.; Sanchez, Tiffany R.; Nachman, Keeve E.; Harvey, David E.; Chillrud, Steven N.; Graziano, Joseph H.; Navas-Acien, Ana (2017-10-22). "The effect of the Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level on arsenic exposure in the USA from 2003 to 2014: an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)". The Lancet Public Health. 2 (11): e513–e521. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30195-0. ISSN   2468-2667. PMC   5729579 . PMID   29250608.
  29. ↑ Alison Bohlen (2002) States move forward to meet new arsenic standard, Southwest Hydrology, May/June 2002, p.18-19.
  30. ↑ Megan A. Ferguson and others, Lowering the detection limit for arsenic: implications for a future practical quantitation limit, American Water Works Association Journal, Aug. 2007, p.92-98.
  31. ↑ John G. Shiber, "Arsenic in domestic well water and health in Central Appalachia, USA"
  32. ↑ Frederick Rubel Jr. and Steven W. Hathaway (1985) Pilot Study for removal of arsenic from drinking water at the Fallon, Nevada, Naval Air Station, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/S2-85/094.
  33. ↑ M. Taqueer A. Qureshi (1995) Sources of Arsenic in the Verde River and Salt River Watersheds, Arizona, M.S. thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.
  34. ↑ Jaymie R. Meliker, Arsenic in drinking water and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and kidney disease in Michigan: a standardized mortality ratio analysis Environmental Health Magazine. Volume 2:4. 2007. Accessed 9 Sept. 2008.
  35. ↑ Johnston, Richard Bart; Hanchett, Suzanne; Khan, Mohidul Hoque (2010-01-01). "The socio-economics of arsenic removal". Nature Geoscience. 3 (1): 2–3. Bibcode:2010NatGe...3....2J. doi:10.1038/ngeo735.
  36. ↑ Karr, James R.; Dudley, Daniel R. (1981-01-01). "Ecological perspective on water quality goals". Environmental Management. 5 (1): 55–68. Bibcode:1981EnMan...5...55K. doi:10.1007/BF01866609. ISSN   0364-152X. S2CID   153568249.
  37. ↑ Fatima Hashmi and Joshua M. Pearce, "Viability of Small-Scale Arsenic-Contaminated Water Purification Technologies for Sustainable Development in Pakistan", Sustainable Development, 19(4), pp. 223–234, 2011. pdf Open access full text
  38. ↑ "Evaluation of Performance of Sono 3-Kolshi Filter for Arsenic Removal from Groundwater Using Zero Valent Iron Through Laboratory and Field Studies" (PDF). (272  KiB)
  39. ↑ "Sono Arsenic Filter from Bangladesh" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-02-06. Retrieved 2006-12-04. (102 KiB) – pictures with descriptions.
  40. ↑ Jing, Chuanyong; Liu, Suqin; Meng, Xiaoguang (2008-01-15). "Arsenic remobilization in water treatment adsorbents under reducing conditions: Part I. Incubation study". Science of the Total Environment. 389 (1): 188–194. Bibcode:2008ScTEn.389..188J. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.08.030. ISSN   0048-9697. PMID   17897702.
  41. ↑ Newspaper article Archived 2012-04-17 at the Wayback Machine (in Hungarian) published by Magyar Nemzet on 15 April 2012.
  42. ↑ Addy, Susan E.A.; Gadgil, Ashok J.; Kowolik, Kristin; Kostecki, Robert (2009). "ElectroChemical Arsenic Removal (ECAR) for Rural Bangladesh—Merging Technology with Sustainable Implementation". doi: 10.2172/982898 . S2CID   15020139.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  43. ↑ van Genuchten, Case M.; Addy, Susan E. A.; Peña, Jasquelin; Gadgil, Ashok J. (2012-01-17). "Removing Arsenic from Synthetic Groundwater with Iron Electrocoagulation: An Fe and As K-Edge EXAFS Study". Environmental Science & Technology. 46 (2): 986–994. Bibcode:2012EnST...46..986V. doi:10.1021/es201913a. ISSN   0013-936X. PMID   22132945.
  44. ↑ Ratna Kumar, P; Chaudhari, Sanjeev; Khilar, Kartic C; Mahajan, S.P (2004). "Removal of arsenic from water by electrocoagulation". Chemosphere. 55 (9): 1245–1252. Bibcode:2004Chmsp..55.1245R. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.12.025. PMID   15081765.
  45. ↑ Hering Janet G.; Katsoyiannis Ioannis A.; Theoduloz Gerardo Ahumada; Berg Michael; Hug Stephan J. (2017-05-01). "Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water: Experiences with Technologies and Constraints in Practice". Journal of Environmental Engineering. 143 (5): 03117002. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001225 . hdl: 20.500.11850/130544 .
  46. ↑ SARKAR, S; GUPTA, A; BISWAS, R; DEB, A; GREENLEAF, J; SENGUPTA, A (1 May 2005). "Well-head arsenic removal units in remote villages of Indian subcontinent: Field results and performance evaluation". Water Research. 39 (10): 2196–2206. Bibcode:2005WatRe..39.2196S. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.002. PMID   15913703.
  47. ↑ 12 Cases of Cleanup & Success
  48. ↑ "World's Worst Polluted Places Report 2009"
  49. ↑ "Can the World's Most Polluted Places Ever Be Cleaned?". Scientific American . Archived from the original on 2012-10-10.
  50. ↑ "Reuters | Breaking International News & Views". Reuters .
  51. ↑ Mukherjee, Sritama; Gupte, Tanvi; Jenifer, S; Thomas, Tiju; Pradeep, Thalappil (December 2019). Arsenic in Water: Speciation, Sources, Distribution, and Toxicology. Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781119300762.wsts0053. ISBN   9781119300762. S2CID   214108659.
  52. ↑ Mukherjee, Sritama; Gupte, Tanvi; Jenifer, S; Thomas, Tiju; Pradeep, Thalappil (29 December 2019). Arsenic in Water: Fundamentals of Measurement and Remediation. Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781119300762.wsts0054. ISBN   9781119300762. S2CID   212834619.
  53. ↑ Sankar, M. Udhaya; Aigal, Sahaja; Chaudhary, Amrita; S., Anshup; M. Maliyekkal, Shihabudheen; Kumar, A. Anil; Chaudhari, Kamalesh; Pradeep, T. (2013). "Biopolymer reinforced synthetic granular nanocomposites for affordable point-of-use water purification". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 (21): 8459–64. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.8459S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220222110 . PMC   3666696 . PMID   23650396.
  54. ↑ Kumar, A. Anil; Som, Anirban; Longo, Paolo; Sudhakar, Chennu; Bhuin, Radha Gobinda; Sen Gupta, Soujit; S., Anshup; Sankar, Mohan Udhaya; Chaudhary, Amrita; Kumar, Ramesh; Pradeep, T (2016). "Confined metastable 2-line ferrihydrite for affordable point-of-use arsenic-free drinking water". Adv. Mater. 29 (7): 1604260. doi:10.1002/adma.201604260. PMID   27918114. S2CID   205273753.
  55. ↑ Pradeep, Thalappil; Mukherjee, Sritama; Kumar, A. Anil. "A method for preparing cellulose microstructures-templated nanocomposites with enhanced arsenic removal capacity, 201641044817, December 26, 2016, granted as patent no. IN337979 on June 4, 2020".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  56. ↑ "Jeevajalam - Arsenic free drinking water - Documentary". Youtube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-14.
  57. ↑ Amini, M.; Mueller, K.; Abbaspour, K.C.; Rosenberg, T.; Afyuni, M.; Møller, M.; Sarr, M.; Johnson, C.A. (2008) Statistical modeling of global geogenic fluoride contamination in groundwaters. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(10), 3662–68, doi : 10.1021/es071958y
  58. ↑ Amini, M.; Abbaspour, K.C.; Berg, M.; Winkel, L.; Hug, S.J.; Hoehn, E.; Yang, H.; Johnson, C.A. (2008). "Statistical modeling of global geogenic arsenic contamination in groundwater". Environmental Science and Technology 42 (10), 3669–75. doi : 10.1021/es702859e
  59. ↑ Winkel, L.; Berg, M.; Amini, M.; Hug, S.J.; Johnson, C.A. Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination in Southeast Asia from surface parameters. Nature Geoscience, 1, 536–42 (2008). doi : 10.1038/ngeo254
  60. ↑ Rodríguez-Lado, L.; Sun, G.; Berg, M.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, H.; Zheng, Q.; Johnson, C.A. (2013) Groundwater arsenic contamination throughout China. Science, 341(6148), 866–68, doi : 10.1126/science.1237484
  61. ↑ Mustak Hossain (2006-07-13). "Toxic rice harvested in southwestern Bangladesh". SciDev.Net.
  62. ↑ Williams, P.N.; Islam, M. R.; Adomako, E. E.; Raab, A.; Hossain, S. A.; Zhu, Y. G.; Feldmann, J.; Meharg, A. A. (2006). "Increase in Rice Grain Arsenic for Regions of Bangladesh Irrigating Paddies with Elevated Arsenic in Groundwaters". Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (16): 4903–4908. Bibcode:2006EnST...40.4903W. doi:10.1021/es060222i. PMID   16955884.
  63. ↑
    • Raghvan T. "Screening of Rice Cultivars for Grain Arsenic Concentration and Speciation". American Society of Agronomy Proceeding.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.