List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 69

Last updated

Supreme Court of the United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 69
38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789;235 years ago (1789-03-04)
Location Washington, D.C.
Coordinates 38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized by Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Website supremecourt.gov

This is a list of cases reported in volume 69 (2 Wall.) of United States Reports , decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1864 and 1865. [1]

Contents

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "nominative reports").

John William Wallace

Starting with the 66th volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was John William Wallace. Wallace was Reporter of Decisions from 1863 to 1874, covering volumes 68 through 90 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 23 of his Wallace's Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, The Andromeda is 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 481 (1865).

Wallace's Reports were the final nominative reports for the US Supreme Court; starting with volume 91, cases were identified simply as "(volume #) U.S. (page #) (year)".

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 69 U.S. (2 Wall.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices). [2] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) were decided the Court's membership began at ten justices, then shrank to nine upon the death of Chief Justice Taney in October 1864, and increased again to the statutory number of ten when Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase took office in December 1864:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Roger B. Taney - Brady-Handy.jpg Roger B. Taney Chief Justice Maryland John Marshall March 15, 1836
(29–15)
March 28, 1836

October 12, 1864
(Died)
Mathew Brady, Portrait of Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase, officer of the United States government (1860-1865).jpg Salmon P. Chase Chief Justice Ohio Roger B. Taney December 6, 1864
(Acclamation)
December 15, 1864

May 7, 1873
(Died)
JMWayne2.jpg James Moore Wayne Associate Justice Georgia William Johnson January 9, 1835
(Acclamation)
January 14, 1835

July 5, 1867
(Died)
John Catron - Brady-Handy.jpg John Catron Associate Justice Tennessee newly created seatMarch 8, 1837
(28–15)
May 1, 1837

May 30, 1865
(Died)
Samuel Nelson - Brady-Handy.jpg Samuel Nelson Associate Justice New York Smith Thompson February 14, 1845
(Acclamation)
February 27, 1845

November 28, 1872
(Retired)
Robert Cooper Grier - Brady-Handy.jpg Robert Cooper Grier Associate Justice Pennsylvania Henry Baldwin August 4, 1846
(Acclamation)
August 10, 1846

January 31, 1870
(Retired)
NClifford.jpg Nathan Clifford Associate Justice Maine Benjamin Robbins Curtis January 12, 1858
(26–23)
January 21, 1858

July 25, 1881
(Died)
Noah Haynes Swayne, photo, head and shoulders, seated.jpg Noah Haynes Swayne Associate Justice Ohio John McLean January 24, 1862
(38–1)
January 27, 1862

January 24, 1881
(Retired)
Samuel Freeman Miller - Brady-Handy.jpg Samuel Freeman Miller Associate Justice Iowa Peter Vivian Daniel July 16, 1862
(Acclamation)
July 21, 1862

October 13, 1890
(Died)
DDavis.jpg David Davis Associate Justice Illinois John Archibald Campbell December 8, 1862
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1862

March 4, 1877
(Resigned)
Stephen Johnson Field, photo half length seated, 1875.jpg Stephen Johnson Field Associate Justice California newly created seatMarch 10, 1863
(Acclamation)
May 10, 1863

December 1, 1897
(Retired)

Notable Cases in 69 U.S. (2 Wall.)

Sketch of interior of a slave ship Slaveshipposter.jpg
Sketch of interior of a slave ship

The Slavers Cases

The four Slavers Cases ((The Bark Kate), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 350 (1865); (The Bark Sarah), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 366 (1865); (The Weathergage), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 375 (1865); and (The Bark Reindeer), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 383 (1865)), involve three ships seized by the federal government near New York City, and one seized off Newport, Rhode Island. The ships appeared to be set up for the slave trade, and had voyages planned to the western coast of Africa where the slave trade flourished at the time. The cargo, fittings, and other circumstances surrounding the ships led to a presumption that they were engaged in slaving, contrary to several federal statutes.

In The Bark Kate (at pp. 363–64), Chief Justice Chase wrote in his opinion for the Court:

In considering this evidence, it is to be borne in mind that for more than three hundred years the western coast of Africa has been scourged by the atrocities of the slave trade, and that this inhuman traffic, although at length proscribed and pursued with severe penalties by nearly all Christian nations, has continued, with almost unabated activity and ferocity, even to our times. Fears of forfeiture of property, and even of life, have been easily overcome by hopes of enormous gains, and so long as markets for slaves remain open, and imperfect execution of the laws permits the expectation of profit from crime, the most conspicuous results of penal legislation will be, more cunning in the contrivance and more adroitness in the use of means for evading or defeating its intent and operation. The difficulty of penetrating the disguises of crime is enhanced in the case of the slave trade by the circumstance that a very considerable traffic [in lawful commerce] . . . has sprung up and is carried on with the same African coast from which human cargoes are collected. It does not seem unreasonable, since it is the paramount interest of humanity that the traffic in men be at all events arrested, to require of the trader who engages in a commerce [that] . . . is necessarily suspicious from its theater and circumstances, that he keep his operations so clear and so distinct in their character as to repel the imputation of prohibited purpose.

In each of the four cases the Supreme Court upheld seizure of the ships by the federal government.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 69 U.S. (2 Wall.)

Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
Dermott v. Jones 1 (1865) Swaynenonenone C.C.D.C. reversed
Hawthorne v. Calef 10 (1865) Nelsonnonenone Me. reversed
Drury v. Foster 24 (1865) Nelsonnonenone"Federal Ct. Minn." (sic)affirmed
Miles v. Caldwell 35 (1865) Millernonenone C.C.D. Mo. reversed
Providence T. Co. v. Norris 45 (1865) Fieldnonenone C.C.D.R.I. reversed
Gregg v. Forsyth 56 (1865) Nelsonnonenone C.C.D. Ill. dismissed
Banks v. Ogden 57 (1865) Chasenonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. reversed
Brooks v. Martin 70 (1864) MillernoneCatron"Federal Ct. Wis." (sic)affirmed
Badger v. Badger 87 (1865) Griernonenone C.C.D. Mass. affirmed
Brobst v. Brobst 96 (1865) Nelsonnonenonenot indicatedcertification
Day v. Gallup 97 (1865) Waynenonenone"Federal Ct. Minn." (sic)dismissed
Humiston v. Stainthorp 106 (1865) Nelsonnonenone C.C.N.D.N.Y. dismissed
Murray v. Lardner 110 (1865) Swaynenonenone C.C.S.D.N.Y. reversed
Heckers v. Fowler 123 (1865) Cliffordnonenone C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Ex parte Dugan 134 (1865) per curiam nonenone Sup. Ct. D.C. certiorari granted
The Circassian 135 (1865) ChasenoneNelson S.D. Fla. affirmed
Freeborn v. Smith 160 (1865) Griernonenone Sup. Ct. Terr. Nev. affirmed
Sheets v. Selden's Lessee 177 (1865) Fieldnonenone C.C.D. Ind. affirmed
Chittenden v. Brewster 191 (1865) Nelsonnonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. reversed
Campbell v. Read 198 (1865) Chasenonenone C.C.D.C. dismissed
Bank Tax Case 200 (1865) Nelsonnonenone N.Y. reversed
Florentine v. Barton 210 (1865) Griernonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Cooke v. United States 218 (1864) Chasenonenonenot indicateddismissal denied
Smith v. United States 219 (1865) Cliffordnonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. reversed
Miller v. Sherry 237 (1865) Swaynenonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Marine Bank v. Fulton Bank 252 (1865) Millernonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
The Venice 258 (1865) Chasenonenone S.D. Fla. affirmed
Pico v. United States 279 (1865) Fieldnonenone N.D. Cal. affirmed
Bronson v. La Crosse & M.R.R. Co. 283 (1864) Nelsonnonenone C.C.D. Wis. reversed
Ransom v. Williams 313 (1865) Swaynenonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Case v. Brown 320 (1865) Griernonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Harvey v. Tyler 328 (1865) Millernonenone W.D. Va. affirmed
The Slavers I 350 (1865) Chasenonenone S.D.N.Y. affirmed
The Slavers II 366 (1865) Cliffordnonenone S.D.N.Y. affirmed
The Slavers III 375 (1865) Cliffordnonenone C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
The Slavers IV 383 (1865) Cliffordnonenone C.C.D.R.I. affirmed
Albany B. Case 403 (1865) per curiam nonenone C.C.N.D.N.Y. affirmed
Mrs. Alexander's Cotton 404 (1865) Chasenonenone S.D. Ill. reversed
Tobey v. Leonards 423 (1865) Waynenonenone C.C.D. Mass. reversed
Milwaukee & M.R.R. Co. v. Soutter I 440 (1865) Chasenonenone"Federal Ct. Wis." (sic)dismissal denied
United States v. Billing 444 (1865) Griernonenonenot indicatedaffirmed
Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. Joliffe 450 (1865) FieldnoneMillerSan Francisco Cnty. Ct.affirmed
The Baigorry 474 (1865) Chasenonenonenot indicatedaffirmed
The Andromeda 481 (1865) ChaseNelsonnone S.D. Fla. affirmed
Kutter v. Smith 491 (1865) Millernonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Levy Court v. Coroner 501 (1865) Millernonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Milwaukee & M.R.R. Co. v. Soutter II 510 (1865) Millernonenone C.C.D. Wis. reversed
United States v. Stone 525 (1865) Griernonenone"Federal Ct. Kan." (sic)affirmed
The Ann Caroline 538 (1865) Cliffordnonenone C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
The Morning Light 550 (1865) Cliffordnonenone C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Gordon v. United States 561 (1865) per curiam nonenone Ct. Cl. dismissed
The Sutter Case 562 (1865) Nelsonnonenone N.D. Cal. reversed
United States v. Pacheco 587 (1865) Fieldnonenone N.D. Cal. affirmed
Read v. Bowman 591 (1865) Cliffordnonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Hogan v. Page 605 (1865) Nelsonnonenone Mo. reversed
Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co. 609 (1865) MillernoneNelson C.C.D. Wis. reversed
The Fossat Case 649 (1864) NelsonnoneClifford D. Cal. reversed
Lowber v. Bangs 728 (1865) SwaynenoneClifford C.C.D. Mass. reversed
Ex parte Fleming 759 (1865) Millernonenone D. Wis. mandamus denied

Notes and references

    1. Anne Ashmore, DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS, Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.
    2. "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.

    See also

    Certificate of division