Sulfurimonas

Last updated

Sulfurimonas
Scientific classification
Domain:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Sulfurimonas

Inagaki et al. 2003 [1]
Type species
Sulfurimonas autotrophica
Inagaki et al. 2003
Species

See text

Sulfurimonas is a bacterial genus within the class of Campylobacterota, known for reducing nitrate, oxidizing both sulfur and hydrogen, and containing Group IV hydrogenases. [2] [3] [4] This genus consists of four species: Sulfurimonas autorophica, Sulfurimonas denitrificans, Sulfurimonas gotlandica, and Sulfurimonas paralvinellae. The genus' name is derived from "sulfur" in Latin and "monas" from Greek, together meaning a “sulfur-oxidizing rod”. [5] The size of the bacteria varies between about 1.5-2.5 μm in length and 0.5-1.0 μm in width. [6] [7] [4] Members of the genus Sulfurimonas are found in a variety of different environments which include deep sea-vents, marine sediments, and terrestrial habitats. [3] Their ability to survive in extreme conditions is attributed to multiple copies of one enzyme [ further explanation needed ]. [3] Phylogenetic analysis suggests that members of the genus Sulfurimonas have limited dispersal ability and its speciation was affected by geographical isolation rather than hydrothermal composition[ citation needed ]. Deep ocean currents affect the dispersal of Sulfurimonas spp., influencing its speciation. [8] As shown in the MLSA report[ further explanation needed ] of deep-sea hydrothermal vents Campylobacterota, Sulfurimonas has a higher dispersal capability compared with deep sea hydrothermal vent thermophiles, indicating allopatric speciation [ verification needed ]. [8]

Contents

Characteristics

Table 1. Specific characteristics of the four species within Sulfurimonas genus
SpeciesSizeMorphology [9] MovementTemperature dependence [6] Habitat conditionsOptimal conditionsDoubling time under optimal conditions(hours)
Sulfurimonas autotrophica 1.5-2.5 x 0.5-1.0 μm [5] RodA single polar flagellum [5] MesophilicTemperature: 10 - 40 °C [5] pH: 5 - 9 [5] Temperature: 23 - 26 °C [9] PH= 6.5 [6] 1.4 [9]
Sulfurimonas denitrificans Variable length with width ~0.3μm [6] Short Rod or Spirilla-likedN/AMesophilicTemperature: 10-30 °C; [9] pH: 7 [10] Temperature: 22 °C [9] PH=7 [6] 12 [9]
Sulfurimonas gotlandica 0.66±0.083 x 62.1±0.54 μm [11] Curved Rod or Spirilla-likedOne polar flagella or two flagella at opposite poles [11] PsychrotolerantTemperature: 4 – 20 °C [6] pH: 6.7–8.0 [6] Temperature: 15 °C [6] 13 [6]
Sulfurimonas paralvinellae 1.50–2.50 μm × 0.6–0.8 μm [9] Rodmoving flagellum

1.5–2.5 μm long and 0.6–0.8 μm wide [9]

MesophilicTemp: 4-35 °C [9] pH: 5.4-8.6Temperature: 30 °C [9] pH=6.1 [6] 13-16 [9]

History of Recognition

"Auto" and ‘trophicos" are derived from Greek words, where "auto" means self and ‘trophicos" refers to nursing, tending or feeding, which indicates its autotrophy. [4] The abundance and distribution of subgroups within the Campylobacterota and the genusSulfurimonas have been detected in the water column using a number of techniques including 16S rRNA cloning, catalyzed reporter deposition and fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH), and quantitative PCR measurements. [12] Water samples were collected at different depths and the concentrations of nutrients, oxygen, and sulfur measured immediately after sampling. The sample was measured for carbon fixation rate, and the DNA extracted and specific sequences amplified by PCR. [12]

The "denitrificans" portion in the name Sulfurimonas denitrificans (S. denitrificans) refers to its ability to reduce nitrate into di-nitrogen gas, a process known as denitrification. In 2006, Sulfurimonas denitrificans was the last species to be placed in the genus Sulfurimonas, as in 2000 it had been wrongly classified into the genus Thiomicrospira. [13]

Studies of Sulfurimonas gotlandica (S. gotlandica) have mostly been from the Baltic Sea, using transmission electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy with phosphotungstic acid and DAPI stain as forms of visualization. [6] [14] [13]

Sulfurimonas paralvinellae was first obtained from a nest of deep-sea polychaete worms, particularly from the family Alvinellidae. Members from the genus Paralvinellae were found at a sulfide mound at a deep-sea hydrothermal vent in the Iheya North Field in the Mid-Okinawa Trough. [9] The strain was initially separated from the nest via dilution-to-extinction technique. The strain was called GO25 T and had resembling physiological and phylogenetic characteristics of Sulfurimonas autotrophica. It was later determined that this species differs from Sulfurimonas autotrophica by having a distinct energy metabolism. [3] [9]

Phylogeny

The currently accepted taxonomy is based on the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) [15] and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [16]

16S rRNA based LTP_08_2023 [17] [18] [19] 120 single copy marker proteins based GTDB 08-RS214 [20] [21] [22]
Sulfurimonas

S. gotlandica

S. indica

S. paralvinellae

S. lithotrophica

S. marinaWang et al. 2022

S. autotrophica

S. aquaticaKojima et al. 2023

S. denitrificans

S. crateris

S. xiamenensis

Sulfurimonas

"Ca. S. baltica" Henkel et al. 2021

"Ca. S. marisnigri" Henkel et al. 2019 ex Henkel et al. 2021

S. denitrificans(Timmer-ten Hoor 1975) Takai et al. 2006

S. craterisRatnikova et al. 2020

S. xiamenensisWang et al. 2020

S. lithotrophicaWang et al. 2020

S. gotlandicaLabrenz et al. 2013

"S. hongkongensis" Cai et al. 2014

"Ca. S. ponti" Van Vliet et al. 2021

S. indicaHu et al. 2021

S. paralvinellae Takai et al. 2006

S. autotrophica Inagaki et al. 2003

"S. hydrogeniphila" Wang et al. 2021

"S. sediminis" Wang et al. 2021

Metabolism

Generally, bacteria have many pathways for metabolism, and in the case of members of the genus Sulfurimonas, this is how they are categorized into taxa. [23] Members of the genus Sulfurimonas live in a wide range of environments, and play a vital role in chemoautotrophic processes, depending on the environment. [3] Isolates of the four species in this genus have been shown to grow with a wide variety of electron acceptors and donors, allowing for members of the genus Sulfurimonas to grow in a wide variety of environments. [3] Therefore, the success of Sulfurimonasspp. is credited to its ability to be a chemolithotroph, its flexible metabolism of changing electron acceptors/donors and sources of inorganic carbon, its oxygen tolerance and its ability to change with the environment. [3] [24] With differing environments, four types of energy metabolism are seen; including sulfur, hydrogen, nitrogen and carbon metabolism. [13]

Sulfur Metabolism

As a sulfur-oxidizing Epsilonproteobacterium, studies have found that Sulfurimonas spp. use a wide variety of electron donors for growth including sulfide, sulfur, thiosulfate, and sulfite. [3] However, as shown below, not all species can use each of the mentioned electron donors (Table 2). Sulfur Oxygenase Reductase (SOR) catalyzes sulfur, creating sulfite, thiosulfate and sulfide. [25] SOR genes are found in S. gotlandica and S. autotrophica, but are absent in S. denitrificans. [13] It's hypothesized that S. denitrificans lost SOR genes because of the low sulfide habitat in the Dutch Wadden Sea. [13]

Sulfurimonas paralvinellae is able to use both molecular hydrogen and reduced sulfur for metabolism, which makes it only the second deep-sea Campylobacterota discovered to do so. [9] Sulfurimonas paralvinellae is also capable of using yeast extract as a sulfur source. [3] Molecular hydrogen is observed to yield a higher growth rate and is favored by Sulfurimonas paralvinellae over free reduced sulfur, even if the latter is present in the environment is excess. This can possibly be explained by the smaller amount of molecular hydrogen required to sustain growth in a bacterial cell as compared to reduced sulfur. [9]

Table 2.List of electron donors for Sulfurimonas species. [3]

Sulfurimonas autorophicaSulfurimonas denitrificansSulfurimonas gotlandicaSulfurimonas paralvinellae
SulfideX
Sulfur
Thiosulfate
SulfiteXXX
HydrogenX

Except for S. paralvinellae, all Sulfurimonas species can use sulfide as an electron donor, by oxidizing sulfide into sulfate. [3] The sulfide oxidizing pathway that's used is called sulfide:quinone reductase (SQR), and is coded by genes involved in the pathway responsible for catalyzing sulfide oxidation. [3] [26] There are six known types of SQR proteins in all the kingdoms. [3]

Most isolates of Epsiolonproteobacteria have SQRs classified as Type II, IV and VI, never have Type I and occasionally have Type III and V. [3] Sulfurimonas is the only known genus in the Campylobacterota that has Type III and V SQRs. [3] Type III is only found in S. denitrificans and S. gotlandica. [3] Type IV SQR is highly conserved, and is found in all four species of Sulfurimonas and so is thought to be the most important SQR for cell survival in the genus Sulfurimonas. [3] According to a study looking at heterologous expression of SQR homologs in S.denitrificans, it has three functional SQRs; Type II, III and IV. [26] Another study also found that Type VI SQR was not in S. denitrificans, but that it was in the other three species. [13] The researchers found that Type VI SQR functioning in high sulfide environments, [13] and hypothesized that S. 'denitrificans doesn't require Type VI SQR because members of the species would have a low probability of encountering free sulfide. [13] On the other hand, S. autotrophic is the only one of the four species that contains Type V SQRs, and was associated with organisms living in acid mines [5]

The exact roles for the functional SQRs remains unknown. [26] However, in general, SQRs are crucial for sulfide oxidation, assimilation and signaling, energy generation and heavy-metal tolerance. [26] Therefore, members of the genus Sulfurimonas are significant contributors to the global sulfur cycle as all members of the species oxidize sulfur to sulfate. [5]

Hydrogen Metabolism

All but one of the Sulfurimonas species can use hydrogen as an energy source to grow. [13] Members of S. autotrophica are the only Sulfurimonas spp. to not use hydrogen, and has been shown to grow with hydrogen in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. [6] In contrast, hydrogen is used as an electron donor at times by bacteria belonging to S. denitrificans, S. gotlandica, and S. paralvinellae, instead of sulfur-based compounds. [27] [6]

To catalyze hydrogen metabolism bacteria belonging to the genus Sulfurimonas use [NiFe]-hydrogenase. The reaction being . [28] There are many different [NiFe]-hydrogenases that are classified into different groups (Groups I to IV) and are found in all four Sulfurimonas species. [13] Since S. autotrophica contains hydrogenases, a study has concluded that under specific environmental conditions it may be able to consume hydrogen. [5]

Another study shows that S. denitrificans grows more efficiently with hydrogen than with thiosulfate. [13] The three Sulfurimonas species express active hydrogen uptake hydrogenase and can grow on hydrogen. [13] Where the bacteria live (i.e. marine water, sediments or hydrothermal vents) will affect the level of oxygen in the environment and therefore the kind of metabolism [13] that they use.

Nitrogen Metabolism

As far as we know, nitrogen metabolism occurs in all members belonging to Sulfurimonas species except S. autotrophica [13] . It has been shown that S. autotrophica could not grow in a concentration of 5 mM sodium nitrate under laboratory conditions. [4] Denitrification by Sulfurimonas spp. has a crucial role in nitrogen cycling. [13] Nitrate turnover for S. denitrificans is 20 mM in three (with thiosulfate and hydrogen) to six days (thiosulfate and no hydrogen). [13] The nitrate turnover in the other two species, S. gotlandica and S. paralvinellae, are quite different. [13] S. gotlandica used only 1 mM nitrate within 9 days (with thiosulfate) and S. paralvinellae used 10 mM nitrate within 4 days (with hydrogen and sulfur). [7] [9] Additionally, S. gotlandica and S. denitrificans can use nitrite instead of nitrate as an electron acceptor. [13] A list of the electron acceptors that Sulfurimonas species can use is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. List of electron acceptors for Sulfurimonas species. [13]

Sulfurimonas autorophicaSulfurimonas denitrificansSulfurimonas gotlandicaSulfurimonas paralvinellae
NitrateX
NitriteXX
Oxygen

To catalyze the reaction of nitrogen metabolism, all Sulfurimonas species have a periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap) catalytic subunit (NapA) . These epsiolonproteobacterial NapAs have a high affinity for nitrate and may represent an adaptation by members of this genus to low environmental nitrate concentrations at deep-sea vents .

Isolates of S. gotlandica and S. denitrificans are well adapted to the fluctuating oxygen and hydrogen sulphide concentrations in the environment because they can both use nitrate, nitrite or oxygen as electron acceptors. Their ability to use nitrate or nitrite as an electron acceptor, instead of oxygen, extends their ecological niche beyond anoxic to much deeper areas in the water column.

Speciation

The species that constitute the genus Sulfurimonas are differentiated by their distinct physiological and genotypic differences. [6] Many isolates have been partially or completely sequenced. For example, the genome of an isolate of S. autotrophica has approximately 2,153,198 base pairs . [5]

Members of this bacterial genus inhabit sulfidic water, pelagic redox zones, and deep-sea vents, where sulfur-containing compounds are abundant. [2] [3] [4] Species in the genus Sulfurimonas use a variety of proteins that catalyze specific compounds found in these areas, which further highlights the commonalities and differences in their DNA genomes. [2] [3] [4] [6] [8]

The similarities in the 16S rRNA gene sequences among Sulfurimonas gotlandica, Sulfurimonas paralvinellae, Sulfurimonas autotrophica, and Sulfurimonas dentrificans are greater than 90%, [6] with S. gotlandica shares a similarity of 93.7 to 94.2% with the other species. [6] Similarly, S. paralvinellae and S. autotrophica (OK10 strain) have 96.3% sequence similarity in their 16S rRNA gene sequences, [5] [9] while S. dentrificans and S. autotrophica (OK10) have a 93.5% sequence similarity. [5]

The G + C content of some of the species’ genomes is similar. S. gotlandica contains a DNA G + C content of 33.6 mol% (A + T, 66.4 mol%), [6] while S. paralvinellae has 37.6 mol% of DNA G + C content (63.4 mol% A + T). [9]

Phylogenetic analysis have shown that Sulfurimonas exhibits limited dispersal ability in that speciation is affected by geographical location more than hydrothermal composition. [8] In addition, deep-ocean currents can affect speciation. [8]

The following table summarizes the information provided above:

Table 4: DNA Content and 16s rRNA Gene Similarity between Sulfurimonas

DNA G + C Content (mol %)DNA A + T Content (mol%)16s rRNA Gene Similarity (%)
SulfurimonasautotrophicaN/AN/A96.3% similarity with S. paralvinellae.

93.7-94.2% similarity with S. gotlandica.

93.5% similarity with S. dentrificans.

Sulfurimonas

dentrificans

N/AN/A93.5% similarity with S. autrotrophica (OK10).

93.7-94.2% similarity with S. gotlandica.

Sulfurimonasgotlandica33.6 mol%66.4 mol%93.7 - 94.2% similarity with ALL species.
Sulfurimonasparalvinellae37.6 mol%63.4 mol%96.3% similarity with S. autrotrophica (OK10).

93.7-94.2% similarity with S. gotlandica.

Habitat

Sulfurimonas are commonly found in (sulfidogenic) habitats, such as marine sediments, deep-sea hydrothermal vents, pelagic redoxclines and oil fields . [29] The habitats where they are found is reflected in their gene content; some members have fewer genes while others have more genes that are related to the environments where they occur. [3] Some of these genes allow the use of different electron donors and acceptors, enabling them to inhabit a range on environments. [3] In deep-sea hydrothermal vents sulfide oxidation is the most important chemical energy source for Sulfurimonas spp. [9] Coincidentally, high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide at deep-sea vents are produced by high temperature seawater-rock interactions . [9] It is notable that microorganisms living in the deep, dark ocean oxidize sulfur compounds for chemolithoautotrophy; this process is microbially mediated . [9] For example, sulfide quinone reductases (SQRs), found in all isolates of Sulfurimonas spp. aids in the oxidation of sulfur- and thiosulfate-containing compounds. [4] [3] [26] As well, hydrogenases and other enzymes allow this particular genus to colonize 'disparate' environments. [3] Due to the dependence on sulfur-containing compounds in the deep sea, this could create competition among species.

Bacterial mats are found at ~100 m water depth next to active hydrothermal vents. [11] Phylogenetic analysis showed that those bacterial mats consisted of bacteria within the genus Sulfurimonas . [11] Similar bacterial mats are found commonly on seamounts created by underwater volcanoes, and by the instense volcanism at hydrothermal vents. [29] Hydrothermal venting favors the growth of bacterial mats in which Sulfurimonas occurs, such as at the Kamaʻehuakanaloa, Axial, Vailulu'u, and Suiyo Seamounts, and the Mariana and Kermadec Arcs. [29]

Biotic Interactions

Predation

Sulfurimonas (subgroup GD17) dominates chemotrophic denitrification in the Baltic Sea pelagic redoxclines. [14] [13] [6] Using methods such as predator assays and bacterial amendment cultures, it was found that the population of Sulfurimonas (subgroup GD17) had a doubling time of 1 to 1.5 days, which is much more than their average doubling time under the optimal conditions shown in Table 1. [30] However, grazing can consume the population over the course of one day. [30] Five active grazers that are typically found in redoxclines ciliates (Oligohymenophorea, Prostomatea), and marine flagellate groups (MAST-4, Chrysophyta, Cercozoa), were found through the use of RNA-SIP. [30] In cold-seep ecosystem, Lithodid crabs (Paralomis sp.), which are filter eaters, feed on thiotropic bacterial mats, which consist of many different types of bacteria. [30]

It was found that in the absence of other possible predictors, bacteria belonging to the genus Sulfurimonas grow in a unimodal relationship, suggesting they increase in bacterial diversity and productivity. This means that without predictors, these bacteria can differentiate and grow exponentially . [30]

Symbiosis

Sulfurimonas is a genus that is commonly observed in symbiosis with other organisms, mostly marine ringed worms. Sulfurimonas paralvinellae is associated with deep-sea polychaete colonies located adjacent to hydrothermal vents. Nests of these worms are covered with reduced sulfur particles produced by a combination of microbiological and chemical processes. These sulfur particles serve as a readily available energy source for bacteria belonging to the genus Sulfurimonas. [9]

Bioturbation by lugworms in shallow-water environments in the absence of oxygen enhances the metabolism of bacteria in the Epsilonproteobacterium phylotype, which shows more than 95% similarity to Sulfurimonas denitrificans. Lugworm activities such as burrowing and peristaltic pumping make oxygen and carbon dioxide dissolved in the water go into the sediment. This enriched layer moves down and mixes with underlying sediment. Oxygen that is taken from the water penetrates this anaerobic layer and creates sulphate available to be used by bacteria for metabolism. Sulphide from the water may also be detoxified by lugworms by either a branched respiratory chain or redox regulation of sulphide oxidation. The end product of these reactions is thiosulphate, which becomes another energy source for chemoautotrophic bacteria colonizing the sediment [31]

Competition

Bacteria belonging to the genus Sulfurimonas are in competition with other sulfate-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) for nutritional resources, and have been studied intensively due to their importance in the petroleum industry. [32] [31] SOB communities constitute physiologically diverse members, such as the genera Sulfurimonas, Chlorobia, and Chloroflexi. [32] All of these genera are found in petroleum reservoirs, and Sulfurimonas are present in high abundances. [31] [32] Members of this genus occupied approximately 26% of reservoirs, all of which differ in temperature and relative proportions of other SOB, which is further an indication that this genus is capable of growth at a wide range of temperatures. [3] [14] [31] [32] Despite this, Sulfurimonas are in competition with Thioclava, Sulfuricurvum, and Thiohalomonas, which correlate with 15.4%, 12.0%, and 17.0% respectively. [32] The majority of bacteria present in these reservoirs are uncultured bacteria, which have not been studied deeply. [31] [32] Bacteria of the aforementioned genera derive their energy from the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds (i.e. sulfide and thiosulfate), which suggests direct competition among them for sulfur-containing compounds [3] [4] [6]

Food Chain/Web

Fig 7. Simplified Sulfurimonas Food Web / Chain Photo Credits: Suman Rana Simplified Sulfurimonas Food Web Chain.png
Fig 7. Simplified Sulfurimonas Food Web / Chain Photo Credits: Suman Rana

Members of the bacterial genus Sulfurimonas are known to affect the relative abundance of species around them. [33] In the case of S. gotlandica strain GD1, it was demonstrated that heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) populations decreased while ciliate and dinoflagellate abundances remained relatively constant in oxygen / hydrogen sulphide rich conditions. [33] Conversely, the opposite trend was observed in suboxic conditions, in that HNF and ciliates increased in abundance, whereas dinoflagellates remained constant. [33] These changes were attributed to both the presence of oxygen / hydrogen sulphide in the environment and the potential predation of HNF by S. gotlandica. [33]

In another study, it was found that five active grazers resides in redoxcline conditions, namely redoxcline ciliates, marine flagellate groups, and some cold-seep ecosystem species. [30] [34] In fact, these organisms are able to consume the entire Sulfurimonas population in that particular area in a day [30]

Environmental relevance

In order to grow, Sulfurimonas species consume both reduced sulfur species and oxidized nitrogen species. Therefore, members of Sulfurimonas directly affect biogeochemical cycling of these elements in environments where they exist and are numerically abundant. For example, Sulfurimonas gotlandica may account for up to 25% of the microbial community in the Baltic sea redoxcline based on CARD-FISH cell counts [35] and Sulfurimonas spp. accounted for a significant number of the Campylobacterota reads in a survey of microbial diversity at deep-sea diffuse flow vents using amplified 16S sequences.

Further Research

Sulfurimonashongkongensis is a newly discovered species within the genus of Sulfurimonas. It was found in Hong Kong, near the coastal sediment at the Kai Tak Approach Channel connecting Victoria Harbour . It produces energy under anoxic conditions. Its electron donor is thiosulfate, sulfide or hydrogen, and its electron acceptor is nitrate . Its morphology is rod-shaped, and it grows at 15-35 °C (optimum at 30 °C), pH 6.5-8.5 (optimum at 7.0-7.5), and 10-60 g L−1 NaCl (optimum at 30 g L−1) . Its genome consists of 34.9% GC content, 2,290 protein-coding genes, and 42 RNA genes (3 rRNA genes). Its major cellular fatty acids were C14:0 (4.8%), C16:0 (32.8%), 2-OH C16:0 (9.5%), C16:1 (14.6%), C18:0 (16.9%), and C18:1 (19.2%). The composition of these fatty acids are similar to those found in isolates of Sulfurimonas paralvinellae' and Sulfurimonas autotrophica', but there is a unique fatty acid, represented by 2-OH C16:0 that defined it is a different species from other members of the genus of Sulfurimonas.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green sulfur bacteria</span> Family of bacteria

The green sulfur bacteria are a phylum, Chlorobiota, of obligately anaerobic photoautotrophic bacteria that metabolize sulfur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemosynthesis</span> Biological process building organic matter using inorganic compounds as the energy source

In biochemistry, chemosynthesis is the biological conversion of one or more carbon-containing molecules and nutrients into organic matter using the oxidation of inorganic compounds or ferrous ions as a source of energy, rather than sunlight, as in photosynthesis. Chemoautotrophs, organisms that obtain carbon from carbon dioxide through chemosynthesis, are phylogenetically diverse. Groups that include conspicuous or biogeochemically important taxa include the sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria, the Campylobacterota, the Aquificota, the methanogenic archaea, and the neutrophilic iron-oxidizing bacteria.

<i>Riftia</i> Giant tube worm (species of annelid)

Riftia pachyptila, commonly known as the giant tube worm and less commonly known as the giant beardworm, is a marine invertebrate in the phylum Annelida related to tube worms commonly found in the intertidal and pelagic zones. R. pachyptila lives on the floor of the Pacific Ocean near hydrothermal vents. The vents provide a natural ambient temperature in their environment ranging from 2 to 30 °C, and this organism can tolerate extremely high hydrogen sulfide levels. These worms can reach a length of 3 m, and their tubular bodies have a diameter of 4 cm (1.6 in).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Purple bacteria</span> Group of phototrophic bacteria

Purple bacteria or purple photosynthetic bacteria are Gram-negative proteobacteria that are phototrophic, capable of producing their own food via photosynthesis. They are pigmented with bacteriochlorophyll a or b, together with various carotenoids, which give them colours ranging between purple, red, brown, and orange. They may be divided into two groups – purple sulfur bacteria and purple non-sulfur bacteria. Purple bacteria are anoxygenic phototrophs widely spread in nature, but especially in aquatic environments, where there are anoxic conditions that favor the synthesis of their pigments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfate-reducing microorganism</span> Microorganisms that "breathe" sulfates

Sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) or sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) are a group composed of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and sulfate-reducing archaea (SRA), both of which can perform anaerobic respiration utilizing sulfate (SO2−
4
) as terminal electron acceptor, reducing it to hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Therefore, these sulfidogenic microorganisms "breathe" sulfate rather than molecular oxygen (O2), which is the terminal electron acceptor reduced to water (H2O) in aerobic respiration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfur-reducing bacteria</span> Microorganisms able to reduce elemental sulfur to hydrogen sulfide

Sulfur-reducing bacteria are microorganisms able to reduce elemental sulfur (S0) to hydrogen sulfide (H2S). These microbes use inorganic sulfur compounds as electron acceptors to sustain several activities such as respiration, conserving energy and growth, in absence of oxygen. The final product of these processes, sulfide, has a considerable influence on the chemistry of the environment and, in addition, is used as electron donor for a large variety of microbial metabolisms. Several types of bacteria and many non-methanogenic archaea can reduce sulfur. Microbial sulfur reduction was already shown in early studies, which highlighted the first proof of S0 reduction in a vibrioid bacterium from mud, with sulfur as electron acceptor and H
2
as electron donor. The first pure cultured species of sulfur-reducing bacteria, Desulfuromonas acetoxidans, was discovered in 1976 and described by Pfennig Norbert and Biebel Hanno as an anaerobic sulfur-reducing and acetate-oxidizing bacterium, not able to reduce sulfate. Only few taxa are true sulfur-reducing bacteria, using sulfur reduction as the only or main catabolic reaction. Normally, they couple this reaction with the oxidation of acetate, succinate or other organic compounds. In general, sulfate-reducing bacteria are able to use both sulfate and elemental sulfur as electron acceptors. Thanks to its abundancy and thermodynamic stability, sulfate is the most studied electron acceptor for anaerobic respiration that involves sulfur compounds. Elemental sulfur, however, is very abundant and important, especially in deep-sea hydrothermal vents, hot springs and other extreme environments, making its isolation more difficult. Some bacteria – such as Proteus, Campylobacter, Pseudomonas and Salmonella – have the ability to reduce sulfur, but can also use oxygen and other terminal electron acceptors.

Lithotrophs are a diverse group of organisms using an inorganic substrate to obtain reducing equivalents for use in biosynthesis or energy conservation via aerobic or anaerobic respiration. While lithotrophs in the broader sense include photolithotrophs like plants, chemolithotrophs are exclusively microorganisms; no known macrofauna possesses the ability to use inorganic compounds as electron sources. Macrofauna and lithotrophs can form symbiotic relationships, in which case the lithotrophs are called "prokaryotic symbionts". An example of this is chemolithotrophic bacteria in giant tube worms or plastids, which are organelles within plant cells that may have evolved from photolithotrophic cyanobacteria-like organisms. Chemolithotrophs belong to the domains Bacteria and Archaea. The term "lithotroph" was created from the Greek terms 'lithos' (rock) and 'troph' (consumer), meaning "eaters of rock". Many but not all lithoautotrophs are extremophiles.

<i>Beggiatoa</i> Genus of bacteria

Beggiatoa is a genus of Gammaproteobacteria belonging to the order Thiotrichales, in the Pseudomonadota phylum. This genus was one of the first bacteria discovered by Ukrainian botanist Sergei Winogradsky. During his research in Anton de Bary's laboratory of botany in 1887, he found that Beggiatoa oxidized hydrogen sulfide (H2S) as an energy source, forming intracellular sulfur droplets, with oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor and CO2 used as a carbon source. Winogradsky named it in honor of the Italian doctor and botanist Francesco Secondo Beggiato (1806 - 1883), from Venice. Winogradsky referred to this form of metabolism as "inorgoxidation" (oxidation of inorganic compounds), today called chemolithotrophy. These organisms live in sulfur-rich environments such as soil, both marine and freshwater, in the deep sea hydrothermal vents and in polluted marine environments. The finding represented the first discovery of lithotrophy. Two species of Beggiatoa have been formally described: the type species Beggiatoa alba and Beggiatoa leptomitoformis, the latter of which was only published in 2017. This colorless and filamentous bacterium, sometimes in association with other sulfur bacteria (for example the genus Thiothrix), can be arranged in biofilm visible to the naked eye formed by a very long white filamentous mat, the white color is due to the stored sulfur. Species of Beggiatoa have cells up to 200 µm in diameter and they are one of the largest prokaryotes on Earth.

Microbial metabolism is the means by which a microbe obtains the energy and nutrients it needs to live and reproduce. Microbes use many different types of metabolic strategies and species can often be differentiated from each other based on metabolic characteristics. The specific metabolic properties of a microbe are the major factors in determining that microbe's ecological niche, and often allow for that microbe to be useful in industrial processes or responsible for biogeochemical cycles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Campylobacterota</span> Class of bacteria

Campylobacterota are a phylum of bacteria. All species of this phylum are Gram-negative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gammaproteobacteria</span> Class of bacteria

Gammaproteobacteria is a class of bacteria in the phylum Pseudomonadota. It contains about 250 genera, which makes it the most genus-rich taxon of the Prokaryotes. Several medically, ecologically, and scientifically important groups of bacteria belong to this class. It is composed by all Gram-negative microbes and is the most phylogenetically and physiologically diverse class of Proteobacteria.

Hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria are a group of facultative autotrophs that can use hydrogen as an electron donor. They can be divided into aerobes and anaerobes. The former use hydrogen as an electron donor and oxygen as an acceptor while the latter use sulphate or nitrogen dioxide as electron acceptors. Species of both types have been isolated from a variety of environments, including fresh waters, sediments, soils, activated sludge, hot springs, hydrothermal vents and percolating water.

Sulfur is metabolized by all organisms, from bacteria and archaea to plants and animals. Sulfur can have an oxidation state from -2 to +6 and is reduced or oxidized by a diverse range of organisms. The element is present in proteins, sulfate esters of polysaccharides, steroids, phenols, and sulfur-containing coenzymes.

<i>Thioploca</i> Genus of bacteria

Thioploca is a genus of filamentous sulphur-oxidizing bacteria which occurs along 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi) of coast off the west of South America. Was discovered in 1907 by R. Lauterborn classified as belonging to the order Thiotrichales, part of the Gammaproteobacteria. They inhabit as well marine as freshwater environments, with vast communities present off the Pacific coast of South America and other areas with a high organic matter sedimentation and bottom waters rich in nitrate and poor in oxygen. A large vacuole occupies more than 80% of their cellular volume and is used as a storage for nitrate. This nitrate is used for the sulphur oxidation, an important characteristic of the genus. Due to their unique size in diameters, ranging from 15-40 µm, they are considered part of the largest bacteria known. Because they use both sulfur and nitrogen compounds they may provide an important link between the nitrogen and sulphur cycles. They secrete a sheath of mucus which they use as a tunnel to travel between the sulfide containing sediment and the nitrate containing sea water.

Sulfurovum lithotrophicum is a species of bacteria, the type species of its genus. It is a sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within the ε-Proteobacteria isolated from Okinawa Trough hydrothermal sediments. It is mesophilic and also oxidises thiosulfate. It is a Gram-negative, non-motile and coccoid to oval-shaped bacterium. The type strain is 42BKTT.

Sulfurimonas autotrophica is a sulfur- and thiosulfate-oxidizing bacterium. It is mesophilic, and its cells are short rods, each being motile by means of a single polar flagellum. Its genome has been sequenced.

Sulfurimonas paralvinellae is a hydrogen- and sulfur-oxidizing bacterium. It is a mesophilic chemolithoautotroph.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microbial oxidation of sulfur</span>

Microbial oxidation of sulfur is the oxidation of sulfur by microorganisms to build their structural components. The oxidation of inorganic compounds is the strategy primarily used by chemolithotrophic microorganisms to obtain energy to survive, grow and reproduce. Some inorganic forms of reduced sulfur, mainly sulfide (H2S/HS) and elemental sulfur (S0), can be oxidized by chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes, usually coupled to the reduction of oxygen (O2) or nitrate (NO3). Anaerobic sulfur oxidizers include photolithoautotrophs that obtain their energy from sunlight, hydrogen from sulfide, and carbon from carbon dioxide (CO2).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrothermal vent microbial communities</span> Undersea unicellular organisms

The hydrothermal vent microbial community includes all unicellular organisms that live and reproduce in a chemically distinct area around hydrothermal vents. These include organisms in the microbial mat, free floating cells, or bacteria in an endosymbiotic relationship with animals. Chemolithoautotrophic bacteria derive nutrients and energy from the geological activity at Hydrothermal vents to fix carbon into organic forms. Viruses are also a part of the hydrothermal vent microbial community and their influence on the microbial ecology in these ecosystems is a burgeoning field of research.

Hydrogen sulfide chemosynthesis is a form of chemosynthesis which uses hydrogen sulfide. It is common in hydrothermal vent microbial communities Due to the lack of light in these environments this is predominant over photosynthesis

References

  1. Inagaki, F.; Takai, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Nealson, K.H.; Horikoshi, K. (2003). "Sulfurimonas autotrophica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfur-oxidizing ε-proteobacterium isolated from hydrothermal sediments in the Mid-Okinawa Trough". Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53 (6): 1801–1805. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02682-0. PMID   14657107.
  2. 1 2 3 Cardman, Zena (2014). "Active prokaryotic communities along a thermally and geochemically variable transect in Guaymas Basin hydrothermal sediments". ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. ProQuest   1612445722.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Han, Yuchen; Perner, Mirjam (2015-01-01). "The globally widespread genus Sulfurimonas: versatile energy metabolisms and adaptations to redox clines". Frontiers in Microbiology. 6: 989. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00989 . PMC   4584964 . PMID   26441918.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Inagaki, Fumio; Takai, Ken; Kobayashi, Hideki; Nealson, Kenneth H.; Horikoshi, Koki (2003-01-01). "Sulfurimonas autotrophica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfur-oxidizing ε-proteobacterium isolated from hydrothermal sediments in the Mid-Okinawa Trough". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 53 (6): 1801–1805. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02682-0. PMID   14657107.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Sikorski, Johannes; Munk, Christine; Lapidus, Alla; Ngatchou Djao, Olivier Duplex; Lucas, Susan; Glavina Del Rio, Tijana; Nolan, Matt; Tice, Hope; Han, Cliff (2010-10-27). "Complete genome sequence of Sulfurimonas autotrophica type strain (OK10T)". Standards in Genomic Sciences. 3 (2): 194–202. doi:10.4056/sigs.1173118 (inactive 31 January 2024). ISSN   1944-3277. PMC   3035374 . PMID   21304749.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2024 (link)
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Labrenz, Matthias; Grote, Jana; Mammitzsch, Kerstin; Boschker, Henricus T. S.; Laue, Michael; Jost, Günter; Glaubitz, Sabine; Jürgens, Klaus (2013-01-01). "Sulfurimonas gotlandica sp. nov., a chemoautotrophic and psychrotolerant epsilonproteobacterium isolated from a pelagic redoxcline, and an emended description of the genus Sulfurimonas". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 63 (11): 4141–4148. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.048827-0. PMC   3836495 . PMID   23749282.
  7. 1 2 Mammitzsch, Kerstin; Jost, Günter; Jürgens, Klaus (2014-02-01). "Impact of dissolved inorganic carbon concentrations and pH on growth of the chemolithoautotrophic epsilonproteobacterium Sulfurimonas gotlandica GD1T". MicrobiologyOpen. 3 (1): 80–88. doi:10.1002/mbo3.153. ISSN   2045-8827. PMC   3937731 . PMID   24376054.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Mino, Sayaka; Nakagawa, Satoshi; Makita, Hiroko; Toki, Tomohiro; Miyazaki, Junichi; Sievert, Stefan M; Polz, Martin F; Inagaki, Fumio; Godfroy, Anne (2017). "Endemicity of the cosmopolitan mesophilic chemolithoautotroph Sulfurimonas at deep-sea hydrothermal vents". The ISME Journal. 11 (4): 909–919. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.178. PMC   5364360 . PMID   28045457.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Takai, Ken; Suzuki, Masae; Nakagawa, Satoshi; Miyazaki, Masayuki; Suzuki, Yohey; Inagaki, Fumio; Horikoshi, Koki (2006-01-01). "Sulfurimonas paralvinellae sp. nov., a novel mesophilic, hydrogen- and sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within the Epsilonproteobacteria isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent polychaete nest, reclassification of Thiomicrospira denitrificans as Sulfurimonas denitrificans comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Sulfurimonas". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 56 (8): 1725–1733. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64255-0 . PMID   16901999.
  10. JANNASCH, HOLGER W; WIRSEN, CARL O.; NELSON, DOUGLAS C.; ROBERTSON, LESLEY A. (1985). "Thiomicrospira crunogena sp. nov., a Colorless, Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacterium from a Deep-sea Hydrothermal Vent". International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 35 (4): 422–424. doi: 10.1099/00207713-35-4-422 .
  11. 1 2 3 4 Phillips, Brennan; Dunbabin, Matthew; Henning, Brad; Howell, Corey; DeCiccio, Alex; Flinders, Ashton; Kelley, Katherine; Scott, Jarrod; Albert, Simon (2016). "Exploring the "Sharkcano": Biogeochemical Observations of the Kavachi Submarine Volcano (Solomon Islands)". Oceanography. 29 (4): 160–169. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2016.85 .
  12. 1 2 Grote, Jana; Labrenz, Matthias; Pfeiffer, Birgit; Jost, Günter; Jürgens, Klaus (2007-11-01). "Quantitative distributions of Epsilonproteobacteria and a Sulfurimonas subgroup in pelagic redoxclines of the central Baltic Sea". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 73 (22): 7155–7161. Bibcode:2007ApEnM..73.7155G. doi:10.1128/AEM.00466-07. ISSN   0099-2240. PMC   2168200 . PMID   17921285.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Han, Yuchen; Perner, Mirjam (2014). "The Role of Hydrogen for Sulfurimonas denitrificans' Metabolism". PLOS ONE. 9 (8): e106218. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j6218H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106218 . PMC   4149538 . PMID   25170905.
  14. 1 2 3 Grote, Jana; Schott, Thomas; Bruckner, Christian G.; Glöckner, Frank Oliver; Jost, Günter; Teeling, Hanno; Labrenz, Matthias; Jürgens, Klaus (2012-01-10). "Genome and physiology of a model Epsilonproteobacterium responsible for sulfide detoxification in marine oxygen depletion zones". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (2): 506–510. Bibcode:2012PNAS..109..506G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111262109 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3258601 . PMID   22203982.
  15. A.C. Parte; et al. "Sulfurimonas". List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN). Retrieved 2023-09-09.
  16. Sayers; et al. "Sulfurimonas". National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) taxonomy database. Retrieved 2023-09-09.
  17. "The LTP" . Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  18. "LTP_all tree in newick format" . Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  19. "LTP_08_2023 Release Notes" (PDF). Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  20. "GTDB release 08-RS214". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  21. "bac120_r214.sp_label". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  22. "Taxon History". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  23. Xu, Jianping (2006-06-01). "INVITED REVIEW: Microbial ecology in the age of genomics and metagenomics: concepts, tools, and recent advances". Molecular Ecology. 15 (7): 1713–1731. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02882.x . ISSN   1365-294X. PMID   16689892. S2CID   16374800.
  24. Campbell, Barbara J.; Engel, Annette Summers; Porter, Megan L.; Takai, Ken (2006-06-01). "The versatile epsilon-proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats". Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 4 (6): 458–468. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1414. ISSN   1740-1526. PMID   16652138. S2CID   10479314.
  25. Janosch, Claudia (2015). "Sulfur Oxygenase Reductase (Sor) in the Moderately Thermoacidophilic Leaching Bacteria: Studies in Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans and Acidithiobacillus caldus". Microorganisms. 3 (4): 707–724. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms3040707 . PMC   5023260 . PMID   27682113.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 Han, Yuchen; Perner, Mirjam (2016). "Sulfide consumption in Sulfurimonas denitrificans and heterologous expression of its three SQR homologs". American Society for Microbiology. 198 (8): 1260–1267. doi:10.1128/JB.01021-15. PMC   4859588 . PMID   26833414.
  27. Gevertz, D.; Telang, A. J.; Voordouw, G.; Jenneman, G. E. (2000-06-01). "Isolation and characterization of strains CVO and FWKO B, two novel nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria isolated from oil field brine". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 66 (6): 2491–2501. Bibcode:2000ApEnM..66.2491G. doi:10.1128/aem.66.6.2491-2501.2000. ISSN   0099-2240. PMC   110567 . PMID   10831429.
  28. Vignais, Paulette M.; Billoud, Bernard (2007-10-01). "Occurrence, classification, and biological function of hydrogenases: an overview". Chemical Reviews. 107 (10): 4206–4272. doi:10.1021/cr050196r. ISSN   0009-2665. PMID   17927159.
  29. 1 2 3 Emerson, David; Moyer, Craig L. (2010). Microbiology of seamounts. Rockville, USA: Oceanography. p. 151.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Anderson, Ruth; Wylezich, Claudia; Glaubitz, Sabine; Labrenz, Matthias; Jürgens, Klaus (2013-05-01). "Impact of protist grazing on a key bacterial group for biogeochemical cycling in Baltic Sea pelagic oxic/anoxic interfaces". Environmental Microbiology. 15 (5): 1580–1594. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12078. ISSN   1462-2920. PMID   23368413.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 Ghosh, Wriddhiman; Dam, Bomba (2009-11-01). "Biochemistry and molecular biology of lithotrophic sulfur oxidation by taxonomically and ecologically diverse bacteria and archaea". FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 33 (6): 999–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00187.x . ISSN   1574-6976. PMID   19645821.
  32. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tian, Huimei; Gao, Peike; Chen, Zhaohui; Li, Yanshu; Li, Yan; Wang, Yansen; Zhou, Jiefang; Li, Guoqiang; Ma, Ting (2017-02-02). "Compositions and Abundances of Sulfate-Reducing and Sulfur-Oxidizing Microorganisms in Water-Flooded Petroleum Reservoirs with Different Temperatures in China". Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 143. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00143 . ISSN   1664-302X. PMC   5288354 . PMID   28210252.
  33. 1 2 3 4 "Changes during the predator exclusion experiments with... - Figure 3 of 6". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2017-03-23.
  34. Niemann, Helge; Linke, Peter; Knittel, Katrin; MacPherson, Enrique; Boetius, Antje; Brückmann, Warner; Larvik, Gaute; Wallmann, Klaus; Schacht, Ulrike (2013-10-07). "Methane-Carbon Flow into the Benthic Food Web at Cold Seeps – A Case Study from the Costa Rica Subduction Zone". PLOS ONE. 8 (10): e74894. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...874894N. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074894 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3792092 . PMID   24116017.
  35. Grote, J.; et al. (2012). "Genome and physiology of a model Epsilonproteobacterium responsible for sulfide detoxification in marine oxygen depletion zones". PNAS. 109 (2): 506–510. Bibcode:2012PNAS..109..506G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111262109 . PMC   3258601 . PMID   22203982.