Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan

Last updated
C-76 Caravan
Curtiss c76 side USAF.jpg
General information
TypeMedium transport
National originUnited States
Manufacturer Curtiss-Wright
StatusCanceled
Primary user United States Army Air Forces
Number built25 (11 prototypes, 5 production C-76, 9 revised YC-76A)
History
First flightMay 3, 1943

The Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan (company designation CW-27) was an American all-wood military transport aircraft. The C-76 was intended as a substitute standard aircraft in the event of expected wartime shortages of light alloys. [1] However, both prototype and production aircraft failed several critical flight and static tests, and after U.S. aluminum production proved sufficient for wartime defense requirements, orders for the C-76 were cancelled and it did not enter production. [2] Although it did not go into its main production, 25 pre-production and prototype aircraft of various types were constructed during development. The factory where it might have been produced made more C-46 Commandoes for which the C-76 would have been a substitute.

Contents

Design and development

Curtiss AT-9 under C-76 Caravan's wing at Curtiss-Wright in 1943. Curtiss C-76 and AT-9 1943.jpg
Curtiss AT-9 under C-76 Caravan's wing at Curtiss-Wright in 1943.

In 1941, Curtiss-Wright was contracted by the United States Army Air Forces to design and construct an all-wood military transport aircraft, with performance specifications meeting or exceeding that of the Douglas C-47 Skytrain then in service. [1] [3]

The Curtiss-Wright CW-27 was designed by Curtiss-Wright's chief designer George A. Page, Jr. as a high-wing, twin-engine, cargo transport aircraft, utilizing plywood construction with a tricycle undercarriage. Though the British de Havilland Mosquito had successfully employed a ply construction using a balsa wood core and birch hardwood exterior, Curtiss-Wright engineers, using research provided by Forest Products Laboratory, [4] rejected this approach, insisting instead on a ply construction of dense mahogany, which greatly increased the plane's weight. [5] At Curtiss' request, Army Materiel Command laid in large supplies of mahogany, and a number of furniture manufacturers, including the Baldwin Piano Company, were subcontracted to build components for the aircraft, which would be assembled at Curtiss-Wright's new defense plant in Louisville, Kentucky. [2] [5]

A radial engine was mounted on each wing, and the aircraft was capable of carrying 23 personnel or a cargo payload. The Caravan had a nose section that swung out to the right to enable outsize loading, including a jeep or small artillery pieces. [6]

The original contract called for 11 YC-76 preproduction aircraft, and the first aircraft would be built and tested at Curtiss-Wright's St. Louis, Missouri Division plant. [3] Subsequently, orders for five C-76 production aircraft and nine revised YC-76As were placed by the USAAF, with line production to commence at the Curtiss-Wright plant in Louisville as well as a Higgins Aircraft Michoud Factory Field in Michoud near New Orleans, Louisiana. [2] [3] [7] To keep the plywood flexible during construction the factory was kept hot and damp. [8] The prototype YC-76 first flew on May 1, 1943. [3]

Only five production aircraft were completed in 1943: three from Curtiss-Wright's St. Louis Division, and two from a new plant at Louisville, Kentucky, which was finished in May 1942. [2] [3] [8] The Higgins Aircraft Co. contract was cancelled by the Army on August 3, 1943 before the Higgins factory in New Orleans had been completed, and Higgins was awarded another contract to produce the C-46 Commando. [7]

Operational history

The YC-76 Curtiss C-76 on ground.jpg
The YC-76

The first flight of the YC-76 prototype took place on 3 May 1943. [2] The C-76 proved severely underpowered from the start, with a cruising speed of 160 mph (260 km/h), a service ceiling of 22,600 feet (6,900 m), a range of only 750 mi (1,210 km), and a cargo capacity of under 8,000 lb (3,600 kg). Colonel J.W. Sessums, a USAAF officer at the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field, later related:

'The first flight [of the C-76] was made and the airplane was very heavy. It developed some serious vibrations. In fact, the pilot was awful glad to make a quick circuit to get back on the ground ... two of the Curtiss test pilots took it out on a flight and the Army requested that our project officer on the airplane be allowed to fly along on this trip. The Curtiss Company refused. We were very glad that they refused because on this second flight, it [the C-76] flew apart and the pilots were lost and so was the plane. [5]

Compared to other cargo aircraft then coming into service, the C-76 was already obsolescent, even allowing for its war-priority method of construction. In addition, the C-76 failed a number of critical flight tests. [9] It was discovered in testing that the C-76 was unstable when not carrying a cargo load; in order to obtain a stable center of gravity, the plane had to be ballasted beyond its maximum permissible gross takeoff weight. [5] [9] At any speed, or in any gusting wind, the C-76's elevators would flap back and forth violently. [9] The wing structure failed in eight separate static tests, sometimes with a load as low as 40% of the wing's rated capacity. [10] The wing failures were attributed by some sources to the failure of the fasteners used to secure the wood components of the aircraft. [9] [8] Numerous additional fasteners, metal stirrups, and wood ply reinforcements were added to the structure in an effort to strengthen it, thereby increasing the plane's overall weight. [9] At the Louisville plant, Curtiss line workers would later recall two C-76 production planes that were kept for some time in the assembly building, with one plane cannibalized to keep the other in flyable condition. [8]

On 10 May 1943, the first YC-76 constructed at the Louisville, Kentucky plant, 42-86918, lost its tail unit, due to a lack of securing bolts, during a test flight, crashing at Okolona, Kentucky, killing three Curtiss-Wright test crew. [2] [11] [12]

As war priority measures designed to increase aluminum production proved successful, the feared shortage of light alloys never materialized. [2] Moreover, USAAF Training Command had begun to forward widespread complaints of insufficient service life on their wooden-winged Fairchild PT-19 primary trainers when exposed to high heat in training bases located in Texas and Florida. [5] The War Department cancelled its orders for the C-76 on 3 August 1943. [11] [13] The Sara Clark Collection, National Archives, Record Group 342, Box 2719, document the disposition of the 25 YC-76 aircraft as Articles #1, #3, # 4, and #5 were placed in the "Z" category, ZC-76, due to the poor gluing conditions and assembly procedures by subcontractors found through a Material Division inspection of the subcontractors work. These aircraft were assigned to the Technical Training Command and used for ground purposes only. Article #2 was destroyed in static testing at Wright Field. Article #6 was lost in a crash. Article #9 was under repair, but repairs were stopped and the airplane placed in Class 26, non-operational status. Air Service Command operated 12 YC-76s on a service test basis for nine months and found that they required excessive man hours to maintain. It was suggested that these be placed into Class 26 or Survey.[ citation needed ]

The final disposition of the aircraft as of 1 October 1945, by letter of the Air Technical Service Command; 1-Washout upon delivery from factory, 5-Class 26, 10-Survey, 1-Condemned, 8-Reconstruction Finance Corp. to be sold as surplus.[ citation needed ] In the interim, the Curtiss-Wright plants at Buffalo, New York and Louisville, Kentucky went over to full production of the Curtiss C-46 Commando. [2] [14] [15] USAAF Materiel Command later estimated the entire C-76 project cost the U.S. government $400 million dollars and several months in lost production time. [5]

Variants

YC-76
Prototypes, 11 built. [16]
C-76
Production aircraft built at St Louis, five built. [16]
YC-76A
Production variant, nine built. [16]
C-76A
Production variant, order for 175 cancelled, none built. [16]

Specification

3-view line drawing of the Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan 3-view line drawing.png
3-view line drawing of the Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan

Data from Curtiss Aircraft 1907–1947 [17]

General characteristics

Performance

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

The Curtiss-Wright Corporation is a manufacturer and services provider headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina, with factories and operations in and outside the United States. Created in 1929 from the consolidation of Curtiss, Wright, and various supplier companies, the company was immediately the country's largest aviation firm and built more than 142,000 aircraft engines for the U.S. military during World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cessna 208 Caravan</span> Family of utility transport aircraft

The Cessna 208 Caravan is a utility aircraft produced by Cessna. The project was commenced on November 20, 1981, and the prototype first flew on December 9, 1982. The production model was certified by the FAA in October 1984 and its Cargomaster freighter variant was developed for FedEx. The 4 ft (1.2 m) longer 208B Super Cargomaster first flew in 1986 and was developed into the passenger 208B Grand Caravan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss C-46 Commando</span> U.S. military transport aircraft with 2 piston engines, 1940

The Curtiss C-46 Commando is a low-wing, twin-engine aircraft derived from the Curtiss CW-20 pressurized high-altitude airliner design. Early press reports used the name "Condor III" but the Commando name was in use by early 1942 in company publicity. It was used primarily as a cargo aircraft during World War II, with fold-down seating for military transport and some use in delivering paratroops. Mainly deployed by the United States Army Air Forces, it also served the U.S. Navy/Marine Corps, which called it R5C. The C-46 filled similar roles as its Douglas-built counterpart, the C-47 Skytrain, with some 3,200 C-46s produced to approximately 10,200 C-47s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McDonnell Douglas YC-15</span> American prototype military transport aircraft

The McDonnell Douglas YC-15 is a replaced prototype four-engine short take-off and landing (STOL) tactical transport. It was McDonnell Douglas' entrant into the United States Air Force's Advanced Medium STOL Transport (AMST) competition to replace the Lockheed C-130 Hercules as the USAF's standard STOL tactical transport. In the end, neither the YC-15 nor the Boeing YC-14 was ordered into production, although the YC-15's basic design would be used to form the successful McDonnell Douglas C-17 Globemaster III.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender</span> 1943 prototype fighter aircraft

The Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender is a 1940s United States prototype fighter aircraft built by Curtiss-Wright. Along with the Vultee XP-54 and Northrop XP-56, it resulted from United States Army Air Corps proposal R-40C issued on 27 November 1939 for aircraft with improved performance, armament, and pilot visibility over existing fighters; it specifically allowed for unconventional aircraft designs. An unusual design for its time, it had a canard configuration with a rear-mounted engine, and two vertical tails at end of swept wings. Because of its pusher design, it was satirically referred to as the "Ass-ender". Like the XP-54, the Ascender was designed for the 1,800 hp Pratt & Whitney X-1800 24-Cylinder H-engine, but was redesigned after that engine project was canceled. It was also the first Curtiss fighter aircraft to use tricycle landing gear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beechcraft Model 17 Staggerwing</span> American single engine cabin biplane

The Beechcraft Model 17 Staggerwing is an American biplane with an atypical negative wing stagger. It first flew in 1932.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss-Wright AT-9 Jeep</span> American WWII twin-engine advanced trainer aircraft

The Curtiss-Wright AT-9 Jeep is an American twin-engined advanced trainer aircraft used by the United States during World War II to bridge the gap between single-engined trainers and twin-engined combat aircraft. The AT-9 had a low-wing cantilever monoplane configuration, retractable landing gear and was powered by two Lycoming R-680-9 radial engines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss P-60</span> 1941 fighter aircraft family

The Curtiss P-60 was a 1940s American single-engine single-seat, low-wing monoplane fighter aircraft developed by the Curtiss-Wright company as a successor to their P-40. It went through a lengthy series of prototype versions, eventually evolving into a design that bore little resemblance to the P-40. None of these versions reached production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss XP-62</span> Prototype fighter aircraft

The Curtiss XP-62 was a prototype single-engine interceptor aircraft, that was built for the United States Army Air Forces, by the Curtiss-Wright Corporation. It first flew in 1943.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vultee XP-54</span> Prototype fighter aircraft

The Vultee XP-54 Swoose Goose was a prototype fighter built by the Vultee Aircraft Company for the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss A-18 Shrike</span> American attack aircraft

The Curtiss A-18Model 76A Shrike II was a 1930s United States twin-engine ground-attack aircraft. It was the production test version of that company's A-14 Shrike.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waco C-62</span>

The Waco C-62 was a proposed high wing transport airplane similar in size and capacity to the Douglas DC-3. 13 pre-production aircraft were ordered in October 1941, with a contract for 240 production models awarded in early 1942; however, the project was canceled in September 1943 in favor of the Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan before any aircraft were built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Budd RB Conestoga</span>

The Budd RB-1 Conestoga was a twin-engine, stainless steel cargo aircraft designed for the United States Navy during World War II by the Budd Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Although it did not see service in a combat theater, it pioneered design innovations in American cargo aircraft, later incorporated in modern military cargo airlifters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Airborne Transport XCG-16</span>

The XCG-16 was a military transport/assault glider ordered by the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF), from General Airborne Transport Co., for competition against the Waco CG-13A at Wright Field. The XCG-16’s preferred tow aircraft was the Lockheed Model 18 Lodestar.

The Hughes D-2 was an American fighter and bomber project begun by Howard Hughes as a private venture. It never proceeded past the flight testing phase but was the predecessor of the Hughes XF-11. The sole D-2 was completed in 1942–1943.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fokker F-11</span> Type of aircraft

The Fokker F-11 was a luxury flying boat produced as an 'air yacht' in the United States in the late 1920s. Technically the aircraft was the Fokker Aircraft Corporation of America's Model 9. It was sold in North America as the Fokker F-11 and was offered in Europe as the Fokker B.IV. By the time the first six aircraft had been constructed, it was already evident that the design was not going to sell well. A few were sold, two to notable multi-millionaires; Harold Vanderbilt and Garfield Wood each purchasing one. One was bought by Air Ferries in San Francisco. The F-11A cost $40,000 but the price was slashed to $32,500 as the depression set in during 1930. The F-11 was a commercial failure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chase XC-123A</span>

The Chase XC-123A was an experimental transport aircraft developed by Chase Aircraft. The first jet-powered transport built for the United States Air Force, it was intended for use as a high-speed transport for high-priority cargo and personnel. The XC-123A was determined to have insufficient advantages over existing types in service, and did not go into production. The sole prototype was converted into the piston-powered Stroukoff YC-123D to evaluate boundary layer control systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed C-69 Constellation</span> Early military version of the Constellation

The Lockheed C-69 Constellation is a four-engined, propeller-driven military transport aircraft developed during World War II. It was co-developed with the Lockheed Constellation airliner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hughes XF-11</span> Prototype 1940s reconnaissance aircraft

The Hughes XF-11 was a prototype military reconnaissance aircraft designed and flown by Howard Hughes and built by Hughes Aircraft Company for the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF). Although 100 F-11s were ordered in 1943, the program was delayed beyond the end of World War II, rendering the aircraft surplus to USAAF requirements; the production contract was canceled and only two prototypes were completed. During the first XF-11 flight in 1946, piloted by Hughes, the aircraft crashed in Beverly Hills, California, and was destroyed, critically injuring him. The second prototype first flew in 1947 but was used only briefly for testing before being scrapped in 1949. The program was controversial from the beginning, leading the United States Senate to investigate the XF-11 and the Hughes H-4 Hercules flying boat in 1946–1947.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert O. Fisher</span>

Herbert O. Fisher was an American test pilot and an aviation executive, overseeing aviation projects at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. He worked for the Curtiss-Wright Corporation. Fisher flew as a pilot for over 50 years, racking up 19,351 accident and violation free hours.

References

  1. 1 2 Dreher, Carl, Wood Is A War Weapon, Popular Science, Vol. 141 No.3 (September 1942), pp. 48–74
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kleber, John E., The Encyclopedia of Louisville, University Press of Kentucky (2001) ISBN   0-8131-2100-0, ISBN   978-0-8131-2100-0, pp. xxvii, 235–236
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Dorrell, David (ed.), Curtiss Caravan, Air Pictorial: Journal of the Air League, Air League of the British Empire, Volume 35, No. 7 (July 1973), p. 69
  4. Forest Products Journal, January 1, 2007: "G.A. Page, chief engineer of the Curtiss-Wright Division at St. Louis, Mo., wrote, "It [the Design Handbook] has expedited and facilitated our work in connection with the design of the C-76 airplane to a degree that is hard to estimate." Forest Products Laboratory: supporting the nation's armed forces with valuable wood research for 90 years
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sessums, Col. J.W., Design and Engineering Problems of Aircraft Production {Restricted}, May 14, 1946, pp. 6–8 National Defense University Archives Archived 2012-04-18 at the Wayback Machine
  6. "Army In Long Pants" Popular Mechanics, July 1944 – bottom of page 21 photo showing front nose opened for loading
  7. 1 2 Burck, Gilbert, Mr. Higgins and His Wonderful Boats, Life Magazine, 16 August 1943, p. 112
  8. 1 2 3 4 "Aircraft: Curtiss C-76 Caravan". cuny.edu. Archived from the original on 2001-03-19.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Mansfield, Howard, Skylark: The Life, Lies, and Inventions of Harry Atwood, UPNE (1999) ISBN   0-87451-891-1, ISBN   978-0-87451-891-7, pp. 204–205
  10. Curtiss-Wright Corporate Records, Static Tests of Curtiss-Wright C-76 Wings, ENG-51-C359-10, 7/24/43
  11. 1 2 Boyne, Walt, "C-46 [sic]: 'The Basketcase Bummer' " Airpower, Granada Hills, California, May 1974, Volume 4, Number 3, page 64.
  12. Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. VII
  13. News Article, New York Times, August 4, 1943, October 17, 1943
  14. "The Curtiss C-46 Commando". faqs.org.
  15. News Article, New York Times, August 11, 1944
  16. 1 2 3 4 Andrade 1979, p. 80
  17. Bowers, Peter M. (1979). Curtiss aircraft, 1907-1947. London: Putnam. pp. 471–473. ISBN   0370100298.

Bibliography

Commons-logo.svg Media related to Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan at Wikimedia Commons