Hydrothermal vent microbial communities

Last updated
Chemosynthetic microbial mats at the junction between hydrothermal vent and coral reef communities Chemosynthetic Microbial Mats.jpg
Chemosynthetic microbial mats at the junction between hydrothermal vent and coral reef communities

The hydrothermal vent microbial community includes all unicellular organisms that live and reproduce in a chemically distinct area around hydrothermal vents. These include organisms in the microbial mat, free floating cells, or bacteria in an endosymbiotic relationship with animals. Chemolithoautotrophic bacteria derive nutrients and energy from the geological activity at Hydrothermal vents to fix carbon into organic forms. Viruses are also a part of the hydrothermal vent microbial community and their influence on the microbial ecology in these ecosystems is a burgeoning field of research. [1]

Contents

Hydrothermal vents are located where the tectonic plates are moving apart and spreading. This allows water from the ocean to enter into the crust of the earth where it is heated by the magma. The increasing pressure and temperature forces the water back out of these openings, on the way out, the water accumulates dissolved minerals and chemicals from the rocks that it encounters. There are generally three kinds of vents that occur and are all characterized by its temperature and chemical composition. Diffuse vents release clear water typically up to 30 °C. White smoker vents emit a milky-coloured water between 200-330 °C, and black smoker vents generally release water hotter than the other vents between 300-400 °C. The waters from black smokers are darkened by the precipitates of sulfide that are accumulated. [2] Due to the absence of sunlight at these ocean depths, energy is provided by chemosynthesis where symbiotic bacteria and archaea form the bottom of the food chain and are able to support a variety of organisms such as Riftia pachyptila and Alvinella pompejana. These organisms use this symbiotic relationship in order to use and obtain the chemical energy that is released at these hydrothermal vent areas. [3]

Environmental Properties

A cloud of effluent being expelled by a hydrothermal vent violently. Expl1296 - Flickr - NOAA Photo Library.jpg
A cloud of effluent being expelled by a hydrothermal vent violently.

Although there is a large variation in temperatures at the surface of the water with the changing depths of the thermocline seasonally, the temperatures underneath the thermocline and the waters near the deep sea are relatively constant. There aren’t any changes that are brought about by seasonal effects or annual changes. These temperatures stay in the range of 0-3 °C with the exception of the waters immediately surrounding the hydrothermal vents which can get as high as 407 °C. [4] [5] These waters are prevented from boiling due to the pressure that is acting upon it at those depths.

With increasing depth, the effects of pressure start to occur. The pressure is due to the weight of water above pushing down. The approximate rate of pressure increase in the ocean is 10Mega-pascals (MPa) for every kilometre that is traveled towards the seafloor. This means that hydrostatic pressure can reach up to 110MPa at the depths of the trenches. [6]

Salinity stay relatively constant within the deep seas communities around the world at 35parts per thousand (ppt). [4]

Although there is very little light in the hydrothermal vent environment, photosynthetic organisms have been found. [7] However, the energy that the majority of organisms use comes from chemosynthesis. The organisms use the minerals and chemicals that come out of the vents.

Adaptations

Extreme conditions in the hydrothermal vent environment mean that microbial communities that inhabit these areas need to adapt to them. Microbes that live here are known to be hyperthermophiles, microorganisms that grow at temperatures above 90 °C. These organisms are found where the fluids from the vents are expelled and mixed with the surrounding water. These hyperthermophilic microbes are thought to contain proteins that have extended stability at higher temperatures due to intramolecular interactions but the exact mechanisms are not clear yet. The stabilization mechanisms for DNA are not as unknown and the denaturation of DNA are thought to be minimized through high salt concentrations, more specifically Mg, K, and PO4 which are highly concentrated in hyperthermophiles. Along with this, many of the microbes have proteins similar to histones that are bound to the DNA and can offer protection against the high temperatures. Microbes are also found to be in symbiotic relationships with other organisms in the hydrothermal vent environment due to their ability to have a detoxification mechanism which allows them to metabolize the sulfide-rich waters which would otherwise be toxic to the organisms and the microbes. [8]

Microbial Biogeochemistry

Introduction

A diagram showing the process of how seawater becomes a part of the hydrothermal effluent including the elements that are added and precipitated. Deep Sea Vent Chemistry Diagram.svg
A diagram showing the process of how seawater becomes a part of the hydrothermal effluent including the elements that are added and precipitated.

Microbial communities at hydrothermal vents mediate the transformation of energy and minerals produced by geological activity into organic material. Organic matter produced by autotrophic bacteria is then used to support the upper trophic levels. The hydrothermal vent fluid and the surrounding ocean water is rich in elements such as iron, manganese and various species of sulfur including sulfide, sulfite, sulfate, elemental sulfur from which they can derive energy or nutrients. [9] Microbes derive energy by oxidizing or reducing elements. Different microbial species use different chemical species of an element in their metabolic processes. For example, some microbe species oxidize sulfide to sulfate and another species will reduce sulfate to elemental sulfur. As a result, a web of chemical pathways mediated by different microbial species transform elements such as carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, and hydrogen, from one species to another. Their activity alters the original chemical composition produced by geological activity of the hydrothermal vent environment. [10]

Carbon Cycle

Geological activity at hydrothermal vents produce an abundance of carbon compounds. [11] Hydrothermal vent plumes contain high concentrations of methane and carbon monoxide with methane concentration reaching 107 times of the surrounding ocean water. [11] [12] Deep ocean water is also a large reservoir of carbon and concentration of carbon dioxide species such as dissolved CO2 and HCO3− around 2.2mM. [13] The bountiful carbon and electron acceptors produced by geological activity support an oasis of chemoautotrophic microbial communities that fix inorganic carbon, such as CO2, using energy from sources such as oxidation of sulfur, iron, manganese, hydrogen and methane. [11] These bacteria supply a large portion of organic carbon that support heterotrophic life at hydrothermal vents. [14]

Carbon Fixation

Carbon fixation is the incorporation of inorganic carbon into organic matter. Unlike the surface of the planet where light is a major source of energy for carbon fixation, hydrothermal vent chemolithotrophic bacteria rely on chemical oxidation to obtain the energy required. [15] Fixation of CO2 is observed in members of Gammaproteobacteria, Campylobacterota, Alphaproteobacteria, and members of Archaea domain at hydrothermal vents. Four major metabolic pathways for carbon fixation found in microbial vent communities include the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle, 3-hydroxypropionate (3-HP) cycle and reductive acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) pathway. [15]

Carbon Fixation Metabolic Pathways
Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (CBB)

The Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle is the most common CO2 fixation pathway found among autotrophs. [16] The key enzyme is ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO). [15] RuBisCO has been identified in members of the microbial community such as Thiomicrospira, Beggiatoa , zetaproteobacterium , and gammaproteobacterial endosymbionts of tubeworms, bivalves, and gastropods. [16]

Reductive Carboxylic Acid Cycle (rTCA)

The Reductive Carboxylic Acid Cycle (rTCA) is the second most commonly found carbon fixation pathway at hydrothermal vents. [16] rTCA cycle is essentially a reversed TCA or Kreb cycle heterotrophs use to oxidize organic matter. Organism that use the rTCA cycle prefer to inhabit anoxic zones in the hydrothermal vent system because some enzymes in the rTCA cycle are sensitive to the presence of O2. [15] It is found in sulfate reducing deltaproteobacterium such as some members of Desulfobacter , Aquificales and Aquifex and Thermoproteales . [15]

3-HP and 3-HP/4-HB cycles

The key enzymes of 3-HP and 3-HP/4-HB cycles are acetyl-CoA/propionyl-CoA carboxylase, malonyl-CoA reductase and propionyl-CoA synthase. Most of the organisms that use this pathway are mixotrophs with the ability to use organic carbon in addition to carbon fixation. [15]

Reductive Acetyl CoA pathway

The Reductive Acetyl CoA pathway has only been found in chemoautotrophs. This pathway does not require ATP as the pathway is directly coupled to the reduction of H2. Organisms that have been found with this pathway prefer H2 rich areas. Species include deltaproteobacterium such as Dulfobacterium autotrophicum, acetogens and methanogenic Archaea. [15]

Methane Metabolism

Hydrothermal vents produce high quantities of methane which can originate from both geological and biological processes. [11] [12] Methane concentrations in hydrothermal vent plumes can exceed 300µM in concentration depending on the vent. In comparison, the vent fluid contains 106 – 107 times more methane than the surrounding deep ocean water, of which methane ranges between 0.2-0.3nM in concentration. [12] Microbial communities use the high concentrations of methane as an energy source and a source of carbon. [11] Methanotrophy, where a species uses methane both as an energy and carbon source, have been observed with the presence of gammaproteobacteria in the Methylococcaceae lineages. [16] Methanotrophs convert methane into carbon dioxide and organic carbon. [12] They are typically characterized by the presence of intercellular membranes and microbes with intercellular membranes were observed to make up 20% of the microbial mat at hydrothermal vents. [11] [12]

Methane Oxidation

Energy generation via methane oxidation yields the next best source of energy after sulfur oxidation. [11] It has been suggested that microbial oxidation facilitates rapid turnover at hydrothermal vents, thus much of the methane is oxidize within short distance of the vent. [12] In hydrothermal vent communities, aerobic oxidation of methane is commonly found in endosymbiotic microbes of vent animals. [17] Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) is typically coupled to reduction of sulfate or Fe and Mn as terminal electron acceptors as these are most plentiful at hydrothermal vents. [12] [18] AOM is found to be prevalent in marine sediments at hydrothermal vents [19] [18] and may be responsible for consuming 75% of methane produced by the vent. [18] Species that perform AOM include Archaea of phylum Thermoproteota (formerly Crenarchaeota) and Thermococcus . [20]

Methanogenesis

Production of methane through methanogenesis can be from degradation of hydrocarbons, from reaction of carbon dioxide or other compounds like formate. [17] Evidence of methanogenesis can be found alongside of AOM in sediments. [19] Thermophilic methanogens are found to grow in Hydrothermal vent plumes at temperatures between 55 °C to 80 °C. [21] However, autotropic methanogenesis performed by many thermophilic species require H2 as an electron donor so microbial growth is limited by H2 availability. [21] [14] Genera of thermophilic methanogens found at hydrothermal vents include Methanocaldococcus, Methanothermococcus , and Methanococcus . [21]

The sulfur cycle processes relevant to hydrothermal vent microbial communities with examples of phyla/genera. Sulfur Cycle for Hydrothermal Vents.png
The sulfur cycle processes relevant to hydrothermal vent microbial communities with examples of phyla/genera.

Sulfur Cycle

Microbial communities at hydrothermal vent convert sulfur such as H2S produced by geological activity into other forms such as sulfite, sulfate, and elemental sulfur for energy or assimilation into organic molecules. [10] Sulfide is plentiful at Hydrothermal Vents, with concentrations from one to tens of mM, whereas the surrounding ocean water usually only contains a few nano molars. [22]

Sulfur Oxidation

Reduced sulfur compounds such as H2S produced by the hydrothermal vents are a major source of energy for sulfur metabolism in microbes. [11] Oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds into forms such as sulfite, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur is used to produce energy for microbe metabolism such as synthesis of organic compounds from inorganic carbon. [10] The major metabolic pathways used for sulfur oxidation includes the SOX pathway and dissimilatory oxidation. The Sox pathway is a multi enzyme pathway capable of oxidizing sulfide, sulfite, elemental sulfur, and thiosulfate to sulfate. [10] Dissimilatory oxidation converts sulfite to elemental sulfur. [9] Sulfur oxidizing species include and the genera of Thiomicrospira, Halothiobacillus, Beggiatoa, Persephonella, and Sulfurimonas. Symbiotic species of the class Gammaproteobacteria and the phlym Campylobacterota can also oxidize sulfur. [10]

Sulfur reduction

Sulfur reduction uses sulfate as an electron acceptor for the assimilation of sulfur. Microbes that perform sulfate reduction typically use hydrogen, methane or organic matter as an electron donor. [18] [23] Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) often use sulfate as electron acceptor. [18] This method is favoured by organisms living in highly anoxic areas of the hydrothermal vent, [23] thus are one of the predominant processes that occur within the sediments. [14] Species that reduce sulfate have been identified in Archaea and members of Deltaproteobacteria such as Desulfovibrio, Desulfobulbus, Desulfobacteria, and Desulfuromonas at hydrothermal vents. [23]

Processes of the nitrogen cycle relevant to microbial communities at hydrothermal vents, including names of pyla/genera. Adapted from Gruber et al. (2008) Nitrogen cycle of hydrothermal vents 2.png
Processes of the nitrogen cycle relevant to microbial communities at hydrothermal vents, including names of pyla/genera. Adapted from Gruber et al. (2008)

Nitrogen Cycle

Deep ocean water contains the largest reservoir of nitrogen available to hydrothermal vents with around 0.59 mM of dissolved Nitrogen gas. [24] [25] Ammonium is the dominant species of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and can be produced by water mass mixing below hydrothermal vents and discharged in vent fluids. [25] Quantities of available ammonium varies with each vent depending on the geological activity and microbial composition. [25] Nitrate and nitrite concentrations are depleted in hydrothermal vents compared to the surrounding seawater. [24]

The study of the Nitrogen Cycle in hydrothermal vent microbial communities still requires more comprehensive research. [24] However, isotope data suggests that microorganism influence dissolved inorganic nitrogen quantities and compositions and all pathways of the nitrogen cycle are likely to be found at hydrothermal vents. [25] Biological nitrogen fixation is important to provide some of the biologically available nitrogen to the nitrogen cycle especially at unsedimented hydrothermal vents. [24] Nitrogen fixation is done by many different microbes including methanogen in the orders Methanomicrobiales , Methanococcales , and Methanobacteriales . [24] Thermophilic microbes have been found to be able to fix nitrogen at higher temperatures such as 92 °C. [24] Nitrogen fixation may be especially prevalent in microbial mats and particulate material where biologically available levels of nitrogen are low, due to high microbe density and anaerobic environment allows the function of nitrogenase, a nitrogen fixing enzyme. [24] Evidence have also been detected of assimilation, nitrification, denitrification, anamox, mineralization and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium. [25] For example, sulfur oxidizing bacteria like Begiatoa species, perform denitrification and reduces nitrate to oxidize H2S. [24] Nitrate assimilation is done by symbiotic species of Riftia pachyptila tubeworm [24]

Bacterial Diversity

The most abundant bacteria in hydrothermal vents are chemolithotrophs. These bacteria use reduced chemical species, most often sulfur, as sources of energy to reduce carbon dioxide to organic carbon. [11] The chemolithotrophic abundance in a hydrothermal vent environment is determined by the available energy sources; different temperature vents have different concentrations of nutrients, suggesting large variation between vents. In general, large microbial populations are found in warm vent water plumes (25 °C), the surfaces exposed to warm vent plumes and in symbiotic tissues within certain vent invertebrates in the vicinity of the vent. [11]

Sulfur-oxidizing

These bacteria use various forms of available sulfur (S−2, S0, S2O3−2) in the presence of oxygen. They are the predominant population in the majority of hydrothermal vents because their source of energy is widely available, and chemosynthesis rates increase in aerobic conditions. The bacteria at hydrothermal vents are similar to the types of sulfur bacteria found in other H2S-rich environments - except Thiomicrospira has replaced Thiobacillus. Other common species are Thiothrix and Beggiatoa, which is of particular importance because of its ability to fix nitrogen. [11]

Methane-oxidizing

Methane is a substantial source of energy in certain hydrothermal vents, but not others: methane is more abundant in warm vents (25 °C) than hydrogen. [11] Many types of methanotrophic bacteria exist, which require oxygen and fix CH4, CH3NH2, and other C1 compounds, including CO2 and CO, if present in vent water. [11] These type of bacteria are also found in Riftia trophosome, indicating a symbiotic relationship. [11] Here, methane-oxidizing bacteria refers to methanotrophs, which are not the same as methanogens: Methanococcus and Methanocaldococcus jannaschii are examples methanogens, [11] which are found in hydrothermal vents; whereas Methylocystaceae are methanotrophs, which have been discovered in hydrothermal vent communities as well. [26]

Hydrogen-oxidizing

Little is known about microbes that use hydrogen as a source of energy, however, studies have shown that they are aerobic, and also symbiotic with Riftia (see below). [11] [27] These bacteria are important in the primary production of organic carbon because the geothermally-produced H2 is taken up for this process. [11] Hydrogen-oxidizing and denitrifying bacteria may be abundant in vents where NO3−-containing bottom seawater mixes with hydrothermal fluid. [11] Desulfonauticus submarinus is a hydrogenotroph that reduces sulfur-compounds in warm vents and has been found in tube worms R. pachyptila and Alvinella pompejana. [28]

Iron- and manganese-oxidizing

These bacteria are commonly found in iron and manganese deposits on surfaces exposed intermittently to plumes of hydrothermal and bottom seawater. However, due to the rapid oxidation of Fe2+ in neutral and alkaline waters (i.e. freshwater and seawater), bacteria responsible for the oxidative deposition of iron would be more commonly found in acidic waters. [11] Manganese-oxidizing bacteria would be more abundant in freshwater and seawater compared to iron-oxidizing bacteria due to the higher concentration of available metal. [11]

Ecology

Symbiotic Relationships

Symbiotic chemosynthesis is an important process for hydrothermal vent communities. [11] At warm vents, common symbionts for bacteria are deep-sea clams, Calpytogena magnifica, mussels such as Bathyomodiolus thermophilus and pogonophoran tube worms, Riftia pachyptila , and Alvinella pompejana . [11] [27] [ self-published source? ] [28] The trophosome of these animals are specified organs for symbionts that contains valuable molecules for chemosynthesis. These organisms have become so reliant on their symbionts that they have lost all morphological features relating to ingestion and digestion, though the bacteria are provided with H2S and free O2. [11] Additionally, methane-oxidizing bacteria have been isolated from C. magnifica and R. pachyptila, which indicate that methane assimilation may take place within the trophosome of these organisms. [9]

Phyla and Genera

To illustrate the incredible diversity of hydrothermal vents, the list below is a cumulative representation of bacterial phyla and genera, in alphabetical order. As shown, proteobacteria appears to be the most dominant phyla present in deep-sea vents.

DNA repair

Microbial communities inhabiting deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimneys appear to be highly enriched in genes that encode enzymes employed in DNA mismatch repair and homologous recombination. [29] This finding suggests that these microbial communities have evolved extensive DNA repair capabilities to cope with the extreme DNA damaging conditions in which they exist. [29]

Viruses and deep-sea hydrothermal vents

Black smoker in the High Rise portion of the Endeavour Hydrothermal Vents. High Rise black smoker.jpg
Black smoker in the High Rise portion of the Endeavour Hydrothermal Vents.

Viruses are the most abundant life in the ocean, harboring the greatest reservoir of genetic diversity. [30] As their infections are often fatal, they constitute a significant source of mortality and thus have widespread influence on biological oceanographic processes, evolution and biogeochemical cycling within the ocean. [31] Evidence has been found however to indicate that viruses found in vent habitats have adopted a more mutualistic than parasitic evolutionary strategy in order to survive the extreme and volatile environment they exist in. [32]

Deep-sea hydrothermal vents were found to have high numbers of viruses indicating high viral production. [33] Samples from the Endeavour Hydrothermal Vents off the coast southwest British Columbia showed that active venting black smokers had viral abundances from 1.45x105 to 9.90x107 per mL with a drop-off in abundance found in the hydrothermal-vent plume (3.5x106 per mL) and outside the venting system (2.94x106 per mL). The high number-density of viruses and therefore viral production (in comparison to surrounding deep-sea waters) implies that viruses are a significant source of microbial mortality at the vents. [33] Like in other marine environments, deep-sea hydrothermal viruses affect abundance and diversity of prokaryotes and therefore impact microbial biogeochemical cycling by lysing their hosts to replicate. [34]

However, in contrast to their role as a source of mortality and population control, viruses have also been postulated to enhance survival of prokaryotes in extreme environments, acting as reservoirs of genetic information. The interactions of the virosphere with microorganisms under environmental stresses is therefore thought to aide microorganism survival through dispersal of host genes through Horizontal Gene Transfer. [35]

Each second, “there's roughly Avogadro’s number of infections going on in the ocean, and every one of those interactions can result in the transfer of genetic information between virus and host” — Curtis Suttle [36]

Temperate phages (those not causing immediate lysis) can sometimes confer phenotypes that improve fitness in prokaryotes [7] The lysogenic life-cycle can persist stably for thousands of generations of infected bacteria and the viruses can alter the host's phenotype by enabling genes (a process known as lysogenic conversion) which can therefore allow hosts to cope with different environments. [37] Benefits to the host population can also be conferred by expression of phage-encoded fitness-enhancing phenotypes. [38]

Lysogenic Cycle: 1. The prokaryotic cell is shown with its DNA, in green. 2. The bacteriophage attaches and releases its DNA, shown in red, into the prokaryotic cell. 3. The phage DNA then moves through the cell to the host's DNA. 4. The phage DNA integrates itself into the host cell's DNA, creating prophage. 5. The prophage then remains dormant until the host cell divides. 6. After the host cell has duplicated, the phage DNA in the daughter cells activate, and the phage DNA begins to express itself. Some of the cells containing the prophage go on to create new phages which will move on to infect other cells. Lysogentic cycle diagram.svg
Lysogenic Cycle: 1. The prokaryotic cell is shown with its DNA, in green. 2. The bacteriophage attaches and releases its DNA, shown in red, into the prokaryotic cell. 3. The phage DNA then moves through the cell to the host's DNA. 4. The phage DNA integrates itself into the host cell's DNA, creating prophage. 5. The prophage then remains dormant until the host cell divides. 6. After the host cell has duplicated, the phage DNA in the daughter cells activate, and the phage DNA begins to express itself. Some of the cells containing the prophage go on to create new phages which will move on to infect other cells.

A review of viral work at hydrothermal vents published in 2015 stated that vents harbour a significant proportion of lysogenic hosts and that a large proportion of viruses are temperate indicating that the vent environments may provide an advantage to the prophage. [39]

One study of virus-host interactions in diffuse-flow hydrothermal vent environments found that the high-incidence of lysogenic hosts and large populations of temperate viruses was unique in its magnitude and that these viruses are likely critical to the systems ecology of prokaryotes. The same study's genetic analysis found that 51% of the viral metagenome sequences were unknown (lacking homology to sequenced data), with high diversity across vent environments but lower diversity for specific vent sites which indicates high specificity for viral targets. [38]

A metagenomic analysis of deep-sea hydrothermal vent viromes showed that viral genes manipulated bacterial metabolism, participating in metabolic pathways as well as forming branched pathways in microbial metabolism which facilitated adaptation to the extreme environment. [40]

An example of this was associated with the sulfur-consuming bacterium SUP05. A study found that 15 of 18 viral genomes sequenced from samples of vent plumes contained genes closely related to an enzyme that the SUP05 chemolithoautotrophs use to extract energy from sulfur compounds. The authors concluded that such phage genes (auxiliary metabolic genes) that are able to enhance the sulfur oxidation metabolism in their hosts could provide selective advantages to viruses (continued infection and replication). [41] The similarity in viral and SUP05 genes for the sulfur metabolism implies an exchange of genes in the past and could implicate the viruses as agents of evolution. [42]

Another metagenomic study found that viral genes had relatively high proportion of metabolism, vitamins and cofactor genes, indicating that viral genomes encode auxiliary metabolic genes. Coupled with the observations of a high proportion of lysogenic viruses, this indicates that viruses are selected to be integrated pro-viruses rather than free floating viruses and that the auxiliary genes can be expressed to benefit both the host and the integrated virus. The viruses enhance fitness by boosting metabolism or offering greater metabolic flexibility to the hosts they’re within. The evidence suggests that deep-sea hydrothermal vent viral evolutionary strategies promote prolonged host integration, favoring a form of mutualism to classic parasitism. [32]

As hydrothermal vents outlets for sub-seafloor material, there is also likely a connection between vent viruses and those in the crust. [39]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green sulfur bacteria</span> Family of bacteria

The green sulfur bacteria are a phylum, Chlorobiota, of obligately anaerobic photoautotrophic bacteria that metabolize sulfur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemosynthesis</span> Biological process building organic matter using inorganic compounds as the energy source

In biochemistry, chemosynthesis is the biological conversion of one or more carbon-containing molecules and nutrients into organic matter, organisms that obtain carbon from carbon dioxide through chemosynthesis, are phylogenetically diverse. Groups that include conspicuous or biogeochemically important taxa include the sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria, the Campylobacterota, the Aquificota, the methanogenic archaea, and the neutrophilic iron-oxidizing bacteria.

Anaerobic respiration is respiration using electron acceptors other than molecular oxygen (O2). Although oxygen is not the final electron acceptor, the process still uses a respiratory electron transport chain.

<i>Riftia pachyptila</i> Giant tube worm (species of annelid)

Riftia pachyptila, commonly known as the giant tube worm and less commonly known as the giant beardworm, is a marine invertebrate in the phylum Annelida related to tube worms commonly found in the intertidal and pelagic zones. R. pachyptila lives on the floor of the Pacific Ocean near hydrothermal vents. The vents provide a natural ambient temperature in their environment ranging from 2 to 30 °C, and this organism can tolerate extremely high hydrogen sulfide levels. These worms can reach a length of 3 m, and their tubular bodies have a diameter of 4 cm (1.6 in).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microbial ecology</span> Study of the relationship of microorganisms with their environment

Microbial ecology is the ecology of microorganisms: their relationship with one another and with their environment. It concerns the three major domains of life—Eukaryota, Archaea, and Bacteria—as well as viruses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfate-reducing microorganism</span> Microorganisms that "breathe" sulfates

Sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) or sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) are a group composed of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and sulfate-reducing archaea (SRA), both of which can perform anaerobic respiration utilizing sulfate (SO2−
4) as terminal electron acceptor, reducing it to hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Therefore, these sulfidogenic microorganisms "breathe" sulfate rather than molecular oxygen (O2), which is the terminal electron acceptor reduced to water (H2O) in aerobic respiration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrogen cycle</span> Hydrogen exchange between the living and non-living world

The hydrogen cycle consists of hydrogen exchanges between biotic (living) and abiotic (non-living) sources and sinks of hydrogen-containing compounds.

Lithotrophs are a diverse group of organisms using an inorganic substrate to obtain reducing equivalents for use in biosynthesis or energy conservation via aerobic or anaerobic respiration. While lithotrophs in the broader sense include photolithotrophs like plants, chemolithotrophs are exclusively microorganisms; no known macrofauna possesses the ability to use inorganic compounds as electron sources. Macrofauna and lithotrophs can form symbiotic relationships, in which case the lithotrophs are called "prokaryotic symbionts". An example of this is chemolithotrophic bacteria in giant tube worms or plastids, which are organelles within plant cells that may have evolved from photolithotrophic cyanobacteria-like organisms. Chemolithotrophs belong to the domains Bacteria and Archaea. The term "lithotroph" was created from the Greek terms 'lithos' (rock) and 'troph' (consumer), meaning "eaters of rock". Many but not all lithoautotrophs are extremophiles.

<i>Beggiatoa</i> Genus of bacteria

Beggiatoa is a genus of Gammaproteobacteria belonging to the order Thiotrichales, in the Pseudomonadota phylum. This genus was one of the first bacteria discovered by Ukrainian botanist Sergei Winogradsky. During his research in Anton de Bary's laboratory of botany in 1887, he found that  Beggiatoa  oxidized  hydrogen sulfide  (H2S) as an energy source, forming intracellular  sulfur  droplets, with oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor and CO2 used as a carbon source. Winogradsky named it in honor of the Italian doctor and botanist  Francesco Secondo Beggiato (1806 - 1883), from Venice. Winogradsky referred to this form of metabolism as "inorgoxidation" (oxidation of inorganic compounds), today called chemolithotrophy. These organisms live in sulfur-rich environments such as soil, both marine and freshwater, in the deep sea hydrothermal vents and in polluted marine environments. The finding represented the first discovery of lithotrophy. Two species of Beggiatoa have been formally described: the type species Beggiatoa alba and Beggiatoa leptomitoformis, the latter of which was only published in 2017. This colorless and filamentous bacterium, sometimes in association with other sulfur bacteria (for example the genus Thiothrix), can be arranged in biofilm visible to the naked eye formed by a very long white filamentous mat, the white color is due to the stored sulfur. Species of Beggiatoa have cells up to 200 µm in diameter and they are one of the largest prokaryotes on Earth.

Microbial metabolism is the means by which a microbe obtains the energy and nutrients it needs to live and reproduce. Microbes use many different types of metabolic strategies and species can often be differentiated from each other based on metabolic characteristics. The specific metabolic properties of a microbe are the major factors in determining that microbe's ecological niche, and often allow for that microbe to be useful in industrial processes or responsible for biogeochemical cycles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gammaproteobacteria</span> Class of bacteria

Gammaproteobacteria is a class of bacteria in the phylum Pseudomonadota. It contains about 250 genera, which makes it the most genus-rich taxon of the Prokaryotes. Several medically, ecologically, and scientifically important groups of bacteria belong to this class. It is composed by all Gram-negative microbes and is the most phylogenetically and physiologically diverse class of Proteobacteria.

Hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria are a group of facultative autotrophs that can use hydrogen as an electron donor. They can be divided into aerobes and anaerobes. The former use hydrogen as an electron donor and oxygen as an acceptor while the latter use sulphate or nitrogen dioxide as electron acceptors. Species of both types have been isolated from a variety of environments, including fresh waters, sediments, soils, activated sludge, hot springs, hydrothermal vents and percolating water.

Sulfur is metabolized by all organisms, from bacteria and archaea to plants and animals. Sulfur can have an oxidation state from -2 to +6 and is reduced or oxidized by a diverse range of organisms. The element is present in proteins, sulfate esters of polysaccharides, steroids, phenols, and sulfur-containing coenzymes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zetaproteobacteria</span> Class of bacteria

The class Zetaproteobacteria is the sixth and most recently described class of the Pseudomonadota. Zetaproteobacteria can also refer to the group of organisms assigned to this class. The Zetaproteobacteria were originally represented by a single described species, Mariprofundus ferrooxydans, which is an iron-oxidizing neutrophilic chemolithoautotroph originally isolated from Kamaʻehuakanaloa Seamount in 1996 (post-eruption). Molecular cloning techniques focusing on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene have also been used to identify a more diverse majority of the Zetaproteobacteria that have as yet been unculturable.

Sulfurimonas is a bacterial genus within the class of Campylobacterota, known for reducing nitrate, oxidizing both sulfur and hydrogen, and containing Group IV hydrogenases. This genus consists of four species: Sulfurimonas autorophica, Sulfurimonas denitrificans, Sulfurimonas gotlandica, and Sulfurimonas paralvinellae. The genus' name is derived from "sulfur" in Latin and "monas" from Greek, together meaning a “sulfur-oxidizing rod”. The size of the bacteria varies between about 1.5-2.5 μm in length and 0.5-1.0 μm in width. Members of the genus Sulfurimonas are found in a variety of different environments which include deep sea-vents, marine sediments, and terrestrial habitats. Their ability to survive in extreme conditions is attributed to multiple copies of one enzyme. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that members of the genus Sulfurimonas have limited dispersal ability and its speciation was affected by geographical isolation rather than hydrothermal composition. Deep ocean currents affect the dispersal of Sulfurimonas spp., influencing its speciation. As shown in the MLSA report of deep-sea hydrothermal vents Campylobacterota, Sulfurimonas has a higher dispersal capability compared with deep sea hydrothermal vent thermophiles, indicating allopatric speciation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine microbial symbiosis</span>

Microbial symbiosis in marine animals was not discovered until 1981. In the time following, symbiotic relationships between marine invertebrates and chemoautotrophic bacteria have been found in a variety of ecosystems, ranging from shallow coastal waters to deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Symbiosis is a way for marine organisms to find creative ways to survive in a very dynamic environment. They are different in relation to how dependent the organisms are on each other or how they are associated. It is also considered a selective force behind evolution in some scientific aspects. The symbiotic relationships of organisms has the ability to change behavior, morphology and metabolic pathways. With increased recognition and research, new terminology also arises, such as holobiont, which the relationship between a host and its symbionts as one grouping. Many scientists will look at the hologenome, which is the combined genetic information of the host and its symbionts. These terms are more commonly used to describe microbial symbionts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microbial oxidation of sulfur</span>

Microbial oxidation of sulfur is the oxidation of sulfur by microorganisms to build their structural components. The oxidation of inorganic compounds is the strategy primarily used by chemolithotrophic microorganisms to obtain energy to survive, grow and reproduce. Some inorganic forms of reduced sulfur, mainly sulfide (H2S/HS−) and elemental sulfur (S0), can be oxidized by chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes, usually coupled to the reduction of oxygen (O2) or nitrate (NO3−). Anaerobic sulfur oxidizers include photolithoautotrophs that obtain their energy from sunlight, hydrogen from sulfide, and carbon from carbon dioxide (CO2).

An oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) is characterized as an oxygen-deficient layer in the world's oceans. Typically found between 200m to 1500m deep below regions of high productivity, such as the western coasts of continents. OMZs can be seasonal following the spring-summer upwelling season. Upwelling of nutrient-rich water leads to high productivity and labile organic matter, that is respired by heterotrophs as it sinks down the water column. High respiration rates deplete the oxygen in the water column to concentrations of 2 mg/L or less forming the OMZ. OMZs are expanding, with increasing ocean deoxygenation. Under these oxygen-starved conditions, energy is diverted from higher trophic levels to microbial communities that have evolved to use other biogeochemical species instead of oxygen, these species include Nitrate, Nitrite, Sulphate etc. Several Bacteria and Archea have adapted to live in these environments by using these alternate chemical species and thrive. The most abundant phyla in OMZs are Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Actinomycetota, and Planctomycetota.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Viral shunt</span>

The viral shunt is a mechanism that prevents marine microbial particulate organic matter (POM) from migrating up trophic levels by recycling them into dissolved organic matter (DOM), which can be readily taken up by microorganisms. The DOM recycled by the viral shunt pathway is comparable to the amount generated by the other main sources of marine DOM.

The deep biosphere is the part of the biosphere that resides below the first few meters of the surface. It extends down at least 5 kilometers below the continental surface and 10.5 kilometers below the sea surface, at temperatures that may reach beyond 120 °C (248 °F) which is comparable to the maximum temperature where a metabolically active organism has been found. It includes all three domains of life and the genetic diversity rivals that on the surface.

References

  1. ↑ Anderson RE, Brazelton WJ, Baross JA (2011). "Is the genetic landscape of the deep subsurface biosphere affected by viruses?". Frontiers in Microbiology. 2: 219. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00219 . PMC   3211056 . PMID   22084639.
  2. ↑ Lutz RA, Kennish MJ (August 1993). "Ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities: A review". Reviews of Geophysics. 31 (3): 211. Bibcode:1993RvGeo..31..211L. doi:10.1029/93rg01280.
  3. ↑ Kádár E, Costa V, Santos RS, Powell JJ (July 2006). "Tissue partitioning of micro-essential metals in the vent bivalve Bathymodiolus azoricus and associated organisms (endosymbiont bacteria and a parasite polychaete) from geochemically distinct vents of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge". Journal of Sea Research. 56 (1): 45–52. Bibcode:2006JSR....56...45K. doi:10.1016/j.seares.2006.01.002.
  4. 1 2 Bergman J (16 February 2011). "Temperature of Ocean Water". Windows to the Universe.
  5. ↑ Haase KM, Petersen S, Koschinsky A, Seifert R, Devey CW, Keir R, et al. (November 2007). "Young volcanism and related hydrothermal activity at 5°S on the slow-spreading southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge" (PDF). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 8 (11): n/a. Bibcode:2007GGG.....811002H. doi: 10.1029/2006gc001509 .
  6. ↑ Jebbar M, Franzetti B, Girard E, Oger P (July 2015). "Microbial diversity and adaptation to high hydrostatic pressure in deep-sea hydrothermal vents prokaryotes". Extremophiles. 19 (4): 721–740. doi:10.1007/s00792-015-0760-3. PMID   26101015. S2CID   17213654.
  7. ↑ Beatty JT, Overmann J, Lince MT, Manske AK, Lang AS, Blankenship RE, et al. (June 2005). "An obligately photosynthetic bacterial anaerobe from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 (26): 9306–9310. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.9306B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503674102 . PMC   1166624 . PMID   15967984.
  8. ↑ Zierenberg RA, Adams MW, Arp AJ (November 2000). "Life in extreme environments: hydrothermal vents". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97 (24): 12961–12962. Bibcode:2000PNAS...9712961Z. doi: 10.1073/pnas.210395997 . PMC   34077 . PMID   11058150.
  9. 1 2 3 Kletzin A, Urich T, Müller F, Bandeiras TM, Gomes CM (February 2004). "Dissimilatory oxidation and reduction of elemental sulfur in thermophilic archaea". Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes. 36 (1): 77–91. doi:10.1023/b:jobb.0000019600.36757.8c. PMID   15168612. S2CID   45653369.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Sievert SM, Hügler M, Taylor CD, Wirsen CO (2008). "Sulfur Oxidation at Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents". Microbial Sulfur Metabolism. pp. 238–258. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72682-1_19. ISBN   978-3-540-72679-1.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Jannasch HW, Mottl MJ (August 1985). "Geomicrobiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents". Science. 229 (4715): 717–725. Bibcode:1985Sci...229..717J. doi:10.1126/science.229.4715.717. JSTOR   1696097. PMID   17841485. S2CID   24859537.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 de Angelis MA (1989). Studies of microbial methane oxidation in deep sea hydrothermal vent environments (Thesis). ProQuest   303750552.
  13. ↑ Dunk RM, Peltzer ET, Walz PM, Brewer PG (December 2005). "Seeing a deep ocean CO2 enrichment experiment in a new light: laser raman detection of dissolved CO2 in seawater". Environmental Science & Technology. 39 (24): 9630–9636. Bibcode:2005EnST...39.9630D. doi:10.1021/es0511725. PMID   16475344.
  14. 1 2 3 Ver Eecke HC, Butterfield DA, Huber JA, Lilley MD, Olson EJ, Roe KK, et al. (August 2012). "Hydrogen-limited growth of hyperthermophilic methanogens at deep-sea hydrothermal vents". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (34): 13674–13679. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10913674V. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206632109 . PMC   3427048 . PMID   22869718.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Nakagawa S, Takai K (July 2008). "Deep-sea vent chemoautotrophs: diversity, biochemistry and ecological significance". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 65 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00502.x . PMID   18503548.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Cerqueira T, Barroso C, Froufe H, Egas C, Bettencourt R (August 2018). "Metagenomic Signatures of Microbial Communities in Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Sediments of Azores Vent Fields". Microbial Ecology. 76 (2): 387–403. doi:10.1007/s00248-018-1144-x. PMID   29354879. S2CID   7879639.
  17. 1 2 Martin W, Baross J, Kelley D, Russell MJ (November 2008). "Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life". Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 6 (11): 805–814. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1991. PMID   18820700. S2CID   1709272.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 Wankel SD, Adams MM, Johnston DT, Hansel CM, Joye SB, Girguis PR (October 2012). "Anaerobic methane oxidation in metalliferous hydrothermal sediments: influence on carbon flux and decoupling from sulfate reduction". Environmental Microbiology. 14 (10): 2726–2740. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02825.x. PMID   22827909.
  19. 1 2 Biddle JF, Cardman Z, Mendlovitz H, Albert DB, Lloyd KG, Boetius A, Teske A (May 2012). "Anaerobic oxidation of methane at different temperature regimes in Guaymas Basin hydrothermal sediments". The ISME Journal. 6 (5): 1018–1031. doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.164. PMC   3329104 . PMID   22094346.
  20. ↑ Brazelton WJ, Schrenk MO, Kelley DS, Baross JA (September 2006). "Methane- and sulfur-metabolizing microbial communities dominate the Lost City hydrothermal field ecosystem". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 72 (9): 6257–6270. Bibcode:2006ApEnM..72.6257B. doi:10.1128/AEM.00574-06. PMC   1563643 . PMID   16957253.
  21. 1 2 3 Topçuoğlu BD, Stewart LC, Morrison HG, Butterfield DA, Huber JA, Holden JF (5 August 2016). "Hydrogen Limitation and Syntrophic Growth among Natural Assemblages of Thermophilic Methanogens at Deep-sea Hydrothermal Vents". Frontiers in Microbiology. 7: 1240. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01240 . PMC   4974244 . PMID   27547206.
  22. ↑ Radford-Knoery J, German CR, Charlou JL, Donval JP, Fouquet Y (March 2001). "Distribution and behavior of dissolved hydrogen sulfide in hydrothermal plumes". Limnology and Oceanography. 46 (2): 461–464. Bibcode:2001LimOc..46..461R. doi: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.2.0461 .
  23. 1 2 3 4 Frank KL, Rogers DR, Olins HC, Vidoudez C, Girguis PR (July 2013). "Characterizing the distribution and rates of microbial sulfate reduction at Middle Valley hydrothermal vents". The ISME Journal. 7 (7): 1391–1401. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.17. PMC   3695286 . PMID   23535916.
  24. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Mehta MP, Butterfield DA, Baross JA (February 2003). "Phylogenetic diversity of nitrogenase (nifH) genes in deep-sea and hydrothermal vent environments of the Juan de Fuca Ridge". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 69 (2): 960–970. Bibcode:2003ApEnM..69..960M. doi:10.1128/aem.69.2.960-970.2003. PMC   143675 . PMID   12571018.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 Bourbonnais A, Lehmann MF, Butterfield DA, Juniper SK (February 2012). "Subseafloor nitrogen transformations in diffuse hydrothermal vent fluids of the Juan de Fuca Ridge evidenced by the isotopic composition of nitrate and ammonium". Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 13 (2): n/a. Bibcode:2012GGG....13.2T01B. doi: 10.1029/2011gc003863 .
  26. ↑ Skennerton CT, Ward LM, Michel A, Metcalfe K, Valiente C, Mullin S, et al. (23 December 2015). "Genomic Reconstruction of an Uncultured Hydrothermal Vent Gammaproteobacterial Methanotroph (Family Methylothermaceae) Indicates Multiple Adaptations to Oxygen Limitation". Frontiers in Microbiology. 6: 1425. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01425 . PMC   4688376 . PMID   26779119.
  27. 1 2 "Hydrothermal vents - microbewiki". microbewiki.kenyon.edu. Retrieved 2018-10-22.
  28. 1 2 Audiffrin C, Cayol JL, Joulian C, Casalot L, Thomas P, Garcia JL, Ollivier B (September 2003). "Desulfonauticus submarinus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 53 (Pt 5): 1585–1590. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02551-0 . PMID   13130052.
  29. 1 2 Xie W, Wang F, Guo L, Chen Z, Sievert SM, Meng J, et al. (March 2011). "Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities inhabiting deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimneys with contrasting chemistries". The ISME Journal. 5 (3): 414–426. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.144. PMC   3105715 . PMID   20927138.
  30. ↑ Suttle CA (September 2005). "Viruses in the sea". Nature. 437 (7057): 356–361. Bibcode:2005Natur.437..356S. doi:10.1038/nature04160. PMID   16163346. S2CID   4370363.
  31. ↑ Suttle CA (October 2007). "Marine viruses--major players in the global ecosystem". Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 5 (10): 801–812. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1750. PMID   17853907. S2CID   4658457.
  32. 1 2 Anderson RE, Sogin ML, Baross JA (3 October 2014). "Evolutionary strategies of viruses, bacteria and archaea in hydrothermal vent ecosystems revealed through metagenomics". PLOS ONE. 9 (10): e109696. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j9696A. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109696 . PMC   4184897 . PMID   25279954.
  33. 1 2 Ortmann AC, Suttle CA (August 2005). "High abundances of viruses in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent system indicates viral mediated microbial mortality". Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 52 (8): 1515–1527. Bibcode:2005DSRI...52.1515O. doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2005.04.002.
  34. ↑ Breitbart M (15 January 2012). "Marine viruses: truth or dare". Annual Review of Marine Science. 4 (1): 425–448. Bibcode:2012ARMS....4..425B. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142805. PMID   22457982.
  35. ↑ Goldenfeld N, Woese C (January 2007). "Biology's next revolution". Nature. 445 (7126): 369. arXiv: q-bio/0702015 . Bibcode:2007Natur.445..369G. doi:10.1038/445369a. PMID   17251963. S2CID   10737747.
  36. ↑ Callaway E (21 August 2008). "New viral way of life discovered in deep-sea vents". New Scientist.
  37. ↑ Clokie MR, Millard AD, Letarov AV, Heaphy S (January 2011). "Phages in nature". Bacteriophage. 1 (1): 31–45. doi:10.4161/bact.1.1.14942. PMC   3109452 . PMID   21687533.
  38. 1 2 Williamson SJ, Cary SC, Williamson KE, Helton RR, Bench SR, Winget D, Wommack KE (November 2008). "Lysogenic virus-host interactions predominate at deep-sea diffuse-flow hydrothermal vents". The ISME Journal. 2 (11): 1112–1121. doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.73. PMID   18719614. S2CID   23516254.
  39. 1 2 Culley AI, Shakya M, Lang AS (2015). "Viral evolution at the limits". In Bakermans C (ed.). Microbial Evolution under Extreme Conditions. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. pp. 209–222. ISBN   978-3-11-038964-7.
  40. ↑ He T, Li H, Zhang X (July 2017). "Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Viruses Compensate for Microbial Metabolism in Virus-Host Interactions". mBio. 8 (4): mBio.00893–17, e00893–17. doi:10.1128/mBio.00893-17. PMC   5513705 . PMID   28698277.
  41. ↑ Anantharaman K, Duhaime MB, Breier JA, Wendt KA, Toner BM, Dick GJ (May 2014). "Sulfur oxidation genes in diverse deep-sea viruses". Science. 344 (6185): 757–760. Bibcode:2014Sci...344..757A. doi:10.1126/science.1252229. hdl: 1912/6700 . PMID   24789974. S2CID   692770.
  42. ↑ Wall T (2 May 2014). "Viruses make zombies of deep sea vent bacteria". ABC News.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.