Part of a series on |

Quantum mechanics |
---|

**Objective-collapse** theories, also known as models of spontaneous wave function collapse or dynamical reduction models,^{ [1] }^{ [2] } were formulated as a response to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics,^{ [3] } to explain why and how quantum measurements always give definite outcomes, not a superposition of them as predicted by the Schrödinger equation, and more generally how the classical world emerges from quantum theory. The fundamental idea is that the unitary evolution of the wave function describing the state of a quantum system is approximate. It works well for microscopic systems, but progressively loses its validity when the mass / complexity of the system increases.

- History of collapse theories
- Most popular models
- Tests of collapse models
- Problems and criticisms to collapse theories
- See also
- Notes
- External links

In collapse theories, the Schrödinger equation is supplemented with additional nonlinear and stochastic terms (spontaneous collapses) which localize the wave function in space. The resulting dynamics is such that for microscopic isolated systems the new terms have a negligible effect; therefore, the usual quantum properties are recovered, apart from very tiny deviations. Such deviations can potentially be detected in dedicated experiments, and efforts are increasing worldwide towards testing them.

An inbuilt amplification mechanism makes sure that for macroscopic systems consisting of many particles, the collapse becomes stronger than the quantum dynamics. Then their wave function is always well-localized in space, so well-localized that it behaves, for all practical purposes, like a point moving in space according to Newton's laws.

In this sense, collapse models provide a unified description of microscopic and macroscopic systems, avoiding the conceptual problems associated to measurements in quantum theory.

The most well-known examples of such theories are:

- Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber (GRW) model
- Continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) model
- Diósi–Penrose (DP) model

Collapse theories stand in opposition to many-worlds interpretation theories, in that they hold that a process of wave function collapse curtails the branching of the wave function and removes unobserved behaviour.

The genesis of collapse models dates back to the 1970s. In Italy, the group of L. Fonda, G.C. Ghirardi and A. Rimini was studying how to derive the exponential decay law^{ [4] } in decay processes, within quantum theory. In their model, an essential feature was that, during the decay, particles undergo spontaneous collapses in space, an idea that was later carried over to characterize the GRW model. Meanwhile, P. Pearle in the USA was developing nonlinear and stochastic equations, to model the collapse of the wave function in a dynamical way;^{ [5] }^{ [6] }^{ [7] } this formalism was later used for the CSL model. However, these models lacked the character of “universality” of the dynamics, i.e. its applicability to an arbitrary physical system (at least at the non-relativistic level), a necessary condition for any model to become a viable option.

The breakthrough came in 1986, when Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber published the paper with the meaningful title “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems”,^{ [8] } where they presented what is now known as the GRW model, after the initials of the authors. The model contains all the ingredients a collapse model should have:

- The Schrödinger dynamics is modified by adding nonlinear stochastic terms, whose effect is to randomly localize the wave function in space.
- For microscopic systems, the new terms are mostly negligible.
- For macroscopic object, the new dynamics keeps the wave function well localized in space, thus ensuring classicality.
- In particular, at the end of measurements, there are always definite outcomes, distributed according to the Born rule.
- Deviations from quantum predictions are compatible with current experimental data.

In 1990 the efforts for the GRW group on one side, and of P. Pearle on the other side, were brought together in formulating the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model,^{ [9] }^{ [10] } where the Schrödinger dynamics and the random collapse are described within one stochastic differential equation, which is capable of describing also systems of identical particles, a feature which was missing in the GRW model.

In the late 1980s and 1990s, Diosi^{ [11] }^{ [12] } and Penrose^{ [13] }^{ [14] } independently formulated the idea that the wave function collapse is related to gravity. The dynamical equation is structurally similar to the CSL equation.

In the context of collapse models, it is worthwhile to mention the theory of quantum state diffusion.^{ [15] }

Three are the models, which are most widely discussed in the literature:

*Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber (GRW) model*:^{ [8] }It is assumed that each constituent of a physical system independently undergoes spontaneous collapses. The collapses are random in time, distributed according to a Poisson distribution; they are random in space and are more likely to occur where the wave function is larger. In between collapses, the wave function evolves according to the Schrödinger equation. For composite systems, the collapse on each constituent causes the collapse of the center of mass wave functions.*Continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) model*:^{ [10] }The Schrödinger equation is supplemented with a nonlinear and stochastic diffusion process driven by a suitably chosen universal noise coupled to the mass-density of the system, which counteracts the quantum spread of the wave function. As for the GRW model, the larger the system, the stronger the collapse, thus explaining the quantum-to-classical transition as a progressive breakdown of quantum linearity, when the system's mass increases. The CSL model is formulated in terms of identical particles.*Diósi–Penrose (DP) model*:^{ [12] }^{ [13] }Diósi and Penrose formulated the idea that gravity is responsible for the collapse of the wave function. Penrose argued that, in a quantum gravity scenario where a spatial superposition creates the superposition of two different spacetime curvatures, gravity does not tolerate such superpositions and spontaneously collapses them. He also provided a phenomenological formula for the collapse time. Independently and prior to Penrose, Diósi presented a dynamical model that collapses the wave function with the same time scale suggested by Penrose.

The Quantum Mechanics with Universal Position Localization (QMUPL) model^{ [12] } should also be mentioned; an extension of the GRW model for identical particles formulated by Tumulka,^{ [16] } which proves several important mathematical results regarding the collapse equations.^{ [17] }

In all models listed so far, the noise responsible for the collapse is Markovian (memoryless): either a Poisson process in the discrete GRW model, or a white noise in the continuous models. The models can be generalized to include arbitrary (colored) noises, possibly with a frequency cutoff: the CSL model model has been extended to its colored version^{ [18] }^{ [19] } (cCSL), as well as the QMUPL model^{ [20] }^{ [21] } (cQMUPL). In these new models the collapse properties remain basically unaltered, but specific physical predictions can change significantly.

In collapse models the energy is not conserved, because the noise responsible for the collapse induces Brownian motion on each constituent of a physical system. Accordingly, the kinetic energy increases at a faint but constant rate. Such a feature can be modified, without altering the collapse properties, by including appropriate dissipative effects in the dynamics. This is achieved for the GRW, CSL and QMUPL models, obtaining their dissipative counterparts (dGRW,^{ [22] } dCSL,^{ [23] } dQMUPL^{ [24] }). In these new models, the energy thermalizes to a finite value.

Lastly, the QMUPL model was further generalized to include both colored noise as well as dissipative effects^{ [25] }^{ [26] } (dcQMUPL model).

Collapse models modify the Schrödinger equation; therefore, they make predictions, which differ from standard quantum mechanical predictions. Although the deviations are difficult to detect, there is a growing number of experiments searching for spontaneous collapse effects. They can be classified in two groups:

*Interferometric experiments.*They are refined versions of the double-slit experiment, showing the wave nature of matter (and light). The modern versions are meant to increase the mass of the system, the time of flight, and/or the delocalization distance in order to create ever larger superpositions. The most prominent experiments of this kind are with atoms, molecules and phonons.*Non-interferometric experiments.*They are based on the fact that the collapse noise, besides collapsing the wave function, also induces a diffusion on top of particles’ motion, which acts always, also when the wave function is already localized. Experiments of this kind involve cold atoms, opto-mechanical systems, gravitational wave detectors, underground experiments.

*Violation of the principle of the conservation of energy *. According to collapse theories, energy is not conserved, also for isolated particles. More precisely, in the GRW, CSL and DP models the kinetic energy increases at a constant rate, which is small but non-zero. This is often presented as an unavoidable consequence of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: the collapse in position causes a larger uncertainty in momentum. This explanation is fundamentally wrong. Actually, in collapse theories the collapse in position determines also a localization in momentum: the wave function is driven to an almost minimum uncertainty state both in position as well as in momentum,^{ [17] } compatibly with Heisenberg's principle.

The reason why the energy increases according to collapse theories, is that the collapse noise diffuses the particle, thus accelerating it. This is the same situation as in classical Brownian motion. And as for classical Brownian motion, this increase can be stopped by adding dissipative effects. Dissipative versions of the QMUPL, GRW and CSL model exist,^{ [22] }^{ [23] }^{ [24] } where the collapse properties are left unaltered with respect to the original models, while the energy thermalizes to a finite value (therefore it can even decrease, depending on its initial value).

Still, also in the dissipative model the energy is not strictly conserved. A resolution to this situation might come by considering also the noise a dynamical variable with its own energy, which is exchanged with the quantum system in such a way that the total system+noise energy is conserved.

*Relativistic collapse models.* One of the biggest challenges in collapse theories is to make them compatible with relativistic requirements. The GRW, CSL and DP models are not. The biggest difficulty is how to combine the nonlocal character of the collapse, which is necessary in order to make it compatible with the experimentally verified violation of Bell inequalities, with the relativistic principle of locality. Models exist,^{ [27] }^{ [28] } that attempt to generalize in a relativistic sense the GRW and CSL models, but their status as relativistic theories is still unclear. The formulation of a proper Lorentz-covariant theory of continuous objective collapse is still a matter of research.

*Tail problem.* In all collapse theories, the wave function is never fully contained within one (small) region of space, because the Schrödinger term of the dynamics will always spread it outside. Therefore, wave functions always contain tails stretching out to infinity, although their “weight” is the smaller, the larger the system. Critics of collapse theories argue that it is not clear how to interpret these *tails*, since they amount to the system never being really fully localized in space.^{ [29] }^{ [30] } Supporters of collapse theories mostly dismiss this criticism as a misunderstanding of the theory,^{ [31] }^{ [32] } as in the context of dynamical collapse theories, the absolute square of the wave function is interpreted as an actual matter density. In this case, the *tails* merely represent an immeasurably small amount of *smeared-out* matter, while from a macroscopic perspective, all particles appear to be point-like for all practical purposes.

- Interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Many-worlds interpretation
- Philosophy of information
- Philosophy of physics
- Quantum information
- Quantum entanglement
- Coherence (physics)
- Quantum decoherence
- EPR paradox
- Quantum Zeno effect
- Measurement problem
- Measurement in quantum mechanics
- Wave function collapse
- Quantum gravity

- ↑ Bassi, Angelo; Ghirardi, GianCarlo (2003). "Dynamical reduction models".
*Physics Reports*.**379**(5–6): 257–426. arXiv: quant-ph/0302164 . Bibcode:2003PhR...379..257B. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00103-0. - ↑ Bassi, Angelo; Lochan, Kinjalk; Satin, Seema; Singh, Tejinder P.; Ulbricht, Hendrik (2013). "Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests".
*Reviews of Modern Physics*.**85**(2): 471–527. arXiv: 1204.4325 . Bibcode:2013RvMP...85..471B. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.85.471. ISSN 0034-6861. - ↑ Bell, J. S. (2004).
*Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy*(2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815676. ISBN 978-0-521-52338-7. - ↑ Fonda, L.; Ghirardi, G. C.; Rimini, A.; Weber, T. (1973). "On the quantum foundations of the exponential decay law".
*Il Nuovo Cimento A*.**15**(4): 689–704. Bibcode:1973NCimA..15..689F. doi:10.1007/BF02748082. ISSN 0369-3546. - ↑ Pearle, Philip (1976). "Reduction of the state vector by a nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation".
*Physical Review D*.**13**(4): 857–868. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.857. - ↑ Pearle, Philip (1979). "Toward explaining why events occur".
*International Journal of Theoretical Physics*.**18**(7): 489–518. Bibcode:1979IJTP...18..489P. doi:10.1007/BF00670504. ISSN 0020-7748. - ↑ Pearle, Philip (1984). "Experimental tests of dynamical state-vector reduction".
*Physical Review D*.**29**(2): 235–240. Bibcode:1984PhRvD..29..235P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.235. - 1 2 Ghirardi, G. C.; Rimini, A.; Weber, T. (1986). "Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems".
*Physical Review D*.**34**(2): 470–491. Bibcode:1986PhRvD..34..470G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.470. PMID 9957165. - ↑ Pearle, Philip (1989). "Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization".
*Physical Review A*.**39**(5): 2277–2289. Bibcode:1989PhRvA..39.2277P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2277. PMID 9901493. - 1 2 Ghirardi, Gian Carlo; Pearle, Philip; Rimini, Alberto (1990). "Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles".
*Physical Review A*.**42**(1): 78–89. Bibcode:1990PhRvA..42...78G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.42.78. PMID 9903779. - ↑ Diósi, L. (1987). "A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics".
*Physics Letters A*.**120**(8): 377–381. Bibcode:1987PhLA..120..377D. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(87)90681-5. - 1 2 3 Diósi, L. (1989). "Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations".
*Physical Review A*.**40**(3): 1165–1174. Bibcode:1989PhRvA..40.1165D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1165. ISSN 0556-2791. PMID 9902248. - 1 2 Penrose, Roger (1996). "On Gravity's role in Quantum State Reduction".
*General Relativity and Gravitation*.**28**(5): 581–600. Bibcode:1996GReGr..28..581P. doi:10.1007/BF02105068. ISSN 0001-7701. - ↑ Penrose, Roger (2014). "On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 1: Quantum State Reduction".
*Foundations of Physics*.**44**(5): 557–575. Bibcode:2014FoPh...44..557P. doi: 10.1007/s10701-013-9770-0 . ISSN 0015-9018. - ↑ Gisin, N; Percival, I C (1992). "The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems".
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General*.**25**(21): 5677–5691. Bibcode:1992JPhA...25.5677G. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/25/21/023. ISSN 0305-4470. - ↑ Tumulka, Roderich (2006). "On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory".
*Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences*.**462**(2070): 1897–1908. arXiv: quant-ph/0508230 . Bibcode:2006RSPSA.462.1897T. doi:10.1098/rspa.2005.1636. ISSN 1364-5021. - 1 2 Bassi, Angelo (2005). "Collapse models: analysis of the free particle dynamics".
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General*.**38**(14): 3173–3192. arXiv: quant-ph/0410222 . doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/14/008. ISSN 0305-4470. - ↑ Adler, Stephen L; Bassi, Angelo (2007). "Collapse models with non-white noises".
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical*.**40**(50): 15083–15098. arXiv: 0708.3624 . Bibcode:2007JPhA...4015083A. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/50/012. ISSN 1751-8113. - ↑ Adler, Stephen L; Bassi, Angelo (2008). "Collapse models with non-white noises: II. Particle-density coupled noises".
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical*.**41**(39): 395308. arXiv: 0807.2846 . Bibcode:2008JPhA...41M5308A. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/39/395308. ISSN 1751-8113. - ↑ Bassi, Angelo; Ferialdi, Luca (2009). "Non-Markovian dynamics for a free quantum particle subject to spontaneous collapse in space: General solution and main properties".
*Physical Review A*.**80**(1): 012116. arXiv: 0901.1254 . Bibcode:2009PhRvA..80a2116B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.012116. ISSN 1050-2947. - ↑ Bassi, Angelo; Ferialdi, Luca (2009). "Non-Markovian Quantum Trajectories: An Exact Result".
*Physical Review Letters*.**103**(5): 050403. arXiv: 0907.1615 . Bibcode:2009PhRvL.103e0403B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.050403. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 19792469. - 1 2 Smirne, Andrea; Vacchini, Bassano; Bassi, Angelo (2014). "Dissipative extension of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber model".
*Physical Review A*.**90**(6): 062135. arXiv: 1408.6115 . Bibcode:2014PhRvA..90f2135S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.062135. ISSN 1050-2947. - 1 2 Smirne, Andrea; Bassi, Angelo (2015). "Dissipative Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model".
*Scientific Reports*.**5**(1): 12518. arXiv: 1408.6446 . Bibcode:2015NatSR...512518S. doi:10.1038/srep12518. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 4525142 . PMID 26243034. - 1 2 Bassi, Angelo; Ippoliti, Emiliano; Vacchini, Bassano (2005). "On the energy increase in space-collapse models".
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General*.**38**(37): 8017–8038. arXiv: quant-ph/0506083 . Bibcode:2005JPhA...38.8017B. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/37/007. ISSN 0305-4470. - ↑ Ferialdi, Luca; Bassi, Angelo (2012). "Dissipative collapse models with nonwhite noises".
*Physical Review A*.**86**(2): 022108. arXiv: 1112.5065 . Bibcode:2012PhRvA..86b2108F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022108. ISSN 1050-2947. - ↑ Ferialdi, Luca; Bassi, Angelo (2012). "Exact Solution for a Non-Markovian Dissipative Quantum Dynamics".
*Physical Review Letters*.**108**(17): 170404. arXiv: 1204.4348 . Bibcode:2012PhRvL.108q0404F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.170404. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 22680843. - ↑ Ghirardi, G. C.; Grassi, R.; Pearle, P. (1990). "Relativistic dynamical reduction models: General framework and examples".
*Foundations of Physics*.**20**(11): 1271–1316. Bibcode:1990FoPh...20.1271G. doi:10.1007/BF01883487. ISSN 0015-9018. - ↑ Tumulka, Roderich (2006). "A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Model".
*Journal of Statistical Physics*.**125**(4): 821–840. arXiv: quant-ph/0406094 . Bibcode:2006JSP...125..821T. doi:10.1007/s10955-006-9227-3. ISSN 0022-4715. - ↑ Lewis, Peter J. (1997). "Quantum Mechanics, Orthogonality, and Counting".
*The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*.**48**(3): 313–328. doi:10.1093/bjps/48.3.313. ISSN 0007-0882. - ↑ Clifton, R.; Monton, B. (1999). "Discussion. Losing your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories".
*The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*.**50**(4): 697–717. doi:10.1093/bjps/50.4.697. ISSN 0007-0882. - ↑ Ghirardi, G. C.; Bassi, A. (1999). "Do dynamical reduction models imply that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects?".
*The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*.**50**(1): 49–64. arXiv: quant-ph/9810041 . doi:10.1093/bjps/50.1.49. ISSN 0007-0882. - ↑ Bassi, A.; Ghirardi, G.-C. (1999). "Discussion. More about dynamical reduction and the enumeration principle".
*The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*.**50**(4): 719–734. doi:10.1093/bjps/50.4.719. ISSN 0007-0882.

- Giancarlo Ghirardi, Collapse Theories, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (First published Thu Mar 7, 2002; substantive revision Tue Nov 8, 2011)

**Wave–particle duality** is the concept in quantum mechanics that every particle or quantum entity may be described as either a particle or a wave. It expresses the inability of the classical concepts "particle" or "wave" to fully describe the behaviour of quantum-scale objects. As Albert Einstein wrote:

It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.

The **quantum Zeno effect** is a feature of quantum-mechanical systems allowing a particle's time evolution to be arrested by measuring it frequently enough with respect to some chosen measurement setting.

In quantum mechanics, the **measurement problem** considers how, or whether, wave function collapse occurs. The inability to observe such a collapse directly has given rise to different interpretations of quantum mechanics and poses a key set of questions that each interpretation must answer.

The **black hole information paradox** is a puzzle resulting from the combination of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Calculations suggest that physical information could permanently disappear in a black hole, allowing many physical states to devolve into the same state. This is controversial because it violates a core precept of modern physics—that, *in principle,* the value of a wave function of a physical system at one point in time should determine its value at any other time. A fundamental postulate of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is that complete information about a system is encoded in its wave function up to when the wave function collapses. The evolution of the wave function is determined by a unitary operator, and unitarity implies that information is conserved in the quantum sense.

The **Alternative models to the Standard Higgs Model** are models which are considered by many particle physicists to solve some of the Higgs boson's existing problems. Two of the most currently researched models are quantum triviality, and Higgs hierarchy problem.

**Quantum metrology** is the study of making high-resolution and highly sensitive measurements of physical parameters using quantum theory to describe the physical systems, particularly exploiting quantum entanglement and quantum squeezing. This field promises to develop measurement techniques that give better precision than the same measurement performed in a classical framework. Together with quantum hypothesis testing, it represents an important theoretical model at the basis of quantum sensing.

A **charge density wave** (CDW) is an ordered quantum fluid of electrons in a linear chain compound or layered crystal. The electrons within a CDW form a standing wave pattern and sometimes collectively carry an electric current. The electrons in such a CDW, like those in a superconductor, can flow through a linear chain compound en masse, in a highly correlated fashion. Unlike a superconductor, however, the electric CDW current often flows in a jerky fashion, much like water dripping from a faucet due to its electrostatic properties. In a CDW, the combined effects of pinning and electrostatic interactions likely play critical roles in the CDW current's jerky behavior, as discussed in sections 4 & 5 below.

The **Landau–Zener formula** is an analytic solution to the equations of motion governing the transition dynamics of a two-state quantum system, with a time-dependent Hamiltonian varying such that the energy separation of the two states is a linear function of time. The formula, giving the probability of a diabatic transition between the two energy states, was published separately by Lev Landau, Clarence Zener, Ernst Stueckelberg, and Ettore Majorana, in 1932.

The **Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theory** (**GRW**) is a spontaneous collapse theory in quantum mechanics, proposed in 1986 by Giancarlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini, and Tullio Weber.

The **light-front quantization** of quantum field theories provides a useful alternative to ordinary equal-time quantization. In particular, it can lead to a relativistic description of bound systems in terms of quantum-mechanical wave functions. The quantization is based on the choice of light-front coordinates, where plays the role of time and the corresponding spatial coordinate is . Here, is the ordinary time, is one Cartesian coordinate, and is the speed of light. The other two Cartesian coordinates, and , are untouched and often called transverse or perpendicular, denoted by symbols of the type . The choice of the frame of reference where the time and -axis are defined can be left unspecified in an exactly soluble relativistic theory, but in practical calculations some choices may be more suitable than others.

**Subir Sachdev** is Herchel Smith Professor of Physics at Harvard University specializing in condensed matter. He was elected to the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in 2014, and received the Lars Onsager Prize from the American Physical Society and the Dirac Medal from the ICTP in 2018.

The ** SP formula** for the dephasing rate of a particle that moves in a fluctuating environment unifies various results that have been obtained, notably in condensed matter physics, with regard to the motion of electrons in a metal. The general case requires to take into account not only the temporal correlations but also the spatial correlations of the environmental fluctuations. These can be characterized by the spectral form factor , while the motion of the particle is characterized by its power spectrum . Consequently, at finite temperature the expression for the dephasing rate takes the following form that involves

In theoretical physics, the **logarithmic Schrödinger equation** is one of the nonlinear modifications of Schrödinger's equation. It is a classical wave equation with applications to extensions of quantum mechanics, quantum optics, nuclear physics, transport and diffusion phenomena, open quantum systems and information theory, effective quantum gravity and physical vacuum models and theory of superfluidity and Bose–Einstein condensation. Its relativistic version was first proposed by Gerald Rosen. It is an example of an integrable model.

A **dynamical reduction** theory (DRT) is an extension of quantum mechanics (QM) that attempts to account for the collapse of the wave function. It is necessary because QM does not account for the specific measurements of observable quantities or events, in the familiar realm of Newtonian or classical physics, that we make in QM experiments.

The **Vicsek model** is a mathematical model used to describe active matter. One motivation of the study of active matter by physicists is the rich phenomenology associated to this field. Collective motion and swarming are among the most studied phenomena. Within the huge number of models that have been developed to catch such behavior from a microscopic description, the most famous is the model introduced by Tamás Vicsek et al. in 1995.

**Giancarlo Ghirardi** was an Italian physicist and emeritus professor of theoretical physics at the University of Trieste.

The light front quantization of quantum field theories provides a useful alternative to ordinary equal-time quantization. In particular, it can lead to a relativistic description of bound systems in terms of quantum-mechanical wave functions. The quantization is based on the choice of light-front coordinates, where plays the role of time and the corresponding spatial coordinate is . Here, is the ordinary time, is one Cartesian coordinate, and is the speed of light. The other two Cartesian coordinates, and , are untouched and often called transverse or perpendicular, denoted by symbols of the type . The choice of the frame of reference where the time and -axis are defined can be left unspecified in an exactly soluble relativistic theory, but in practical calculations some choices may be more suitable than others. The basic formalism is discussed elsewhere.

**Bernstein–Greene–Kruskal modes** are nonlinear electrostatic waves that propagate in an unmagnetized, collisionless plasma. They are nonlinear solutions to the Vlasov–Poisson equation in plasma physics, and are named after physicists Ira B. Bernstein, John M. Greene, and Martin D. Kruskal, who solved and published the exact solution for the one-dimensional case in 1957.

The **continuous spontaneous localization** (**CSL**) model is a spontaneous collapse model in quantum mechanics, proposed in 1989 by Philip Pearle. and finalized in 1990 Gian Carlo Ghirardi, Philip Pearle and Alberto Rimini.

The **Diósi–Penrose model** was introduced as a possible solution to the measurement problem, where the wave function collapse is related to gravity. The model was first suggested by Lajos Diósi when studying how possible gravitational fluctuations may affect the dynamics of quantum systems. Later, following a different line of reasoning, R. Penrose arrived at an estimation for the collapse time of a superposition due to gravitational effects, which is the same as that found by Diósi, hence the name Diósi–Penrose model. However, it should be pointed out that while Diósi gave a precise dynamical equation for the collapse, Penrose took a more conservative approach, estimating only the collapse time of a superposition.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.