Carsharing

Last updated

Opel Corsa owned and operated in Singapore. BlueSG Corsa-e left 2023.jpg
Opel Corsa owned and operated in Singapore.

Carsharing or car sharing (AU, NZ, CA, TH, & US) or car clubs (UK) refers to several models of car rental or car use, where people rent cars for short periods of time, often by the hour. It differs from traditional car rental in the process of collecting and returning the vehicle, often self-service in nature through an app and without entering an office or agency. It also often differs in the length of hire and the cost structure. In some models a commercial company owns the fleet and offers it for member use, while in others the owners are private individuals organised as a cooperative or ad hoc grouping, or that they list their vehicles as part of a car sharing facilitator, who is a separate entity, distinct from the car owner. Car sharing is part of a larger trend of shared mobility.

Contents

History

1940s–1970s: The European Cooperative Origin

Car sharing began with early European cooperative models aimed at community resource sharing rather than commercial profit. The first documented instance was the Selbstfahrergemeinschaft (aka Sefage) cooperative in Zurich, Switzerland, established in 1948. [1] It was largely motivated by economic reasons, enabling individuals who could not afford to purchase cars to share access to one vehicle. [2] The operating model, centered around a small user group, was an early form of the Station-Based/Round-Trip service, where a vehicle was reserved and returned to its original location. [3] The 1970s saw more ambitious, though ultimately short-lived, experiments, including the coin-operated Procotip system in Montpelier, France (1971-1973) and the notable electric-vehicle-based Witkar in Amsterdam (1974-1988). [1] These early programs struggled due to small scale and planning issues, demonstrating that convenience and high vehicle utilization were key to the model's eventual success. [3] Many other shared car experiments were attempted but were unable to grow large enough to sustain, among them: Green Cars (UK, 1977-1984), Bilpoolen (Lund, Sweden, 1976-1979), and Bilkooperativ (Gothenburg, 1985-1990). [4]

1980s–1990s: Cooperative growth and North American introduction

Car sharing saw a resurgence around the 1980s and 1990s with organised, membership-based car sharing programs, particularly in the US and Europe. These were mostly smaller non-profit, cooperative organizations, like StattAuto in Germany, which established viable operational models. [5] similar to initiatives in the Netherlands and in Sweden. [1] In the U.S., early programs like Mobility Enterprise (1983-1986) and the Short-Term Auto Rental (STAR) program in San Francisco (1983-1985) were similarly short-lived. [4] North America had a restart of in their carsharing movement in the 1990s, when Communauto was founded in Quebec City, Canada in 1994, followed shortly thereafter by the first official U.S. operator, CarSharing Portland, in Oregon in 1998, which started with one vehicle and a few neighbors. [6]

Early 2000s: Growth, commercialisation and technological disruption

The growth of car sharing began in the early 2000s, driven by technological advances in communication and reservation systems, as well as rising urbanisation and environmental concerns. The 2000s also marked the commercialisation of car sharing with the launch of major, venture-backed companies. [7]

Carsharing growth in the United States. Actual and Predicted Growth of Carsharing in the United States.png
Carsharing growth in the United States.
Zipcar vehicle in London. Zipcar vehicle in Lewisham, London.jpg
Zipcar vehicle in London.

Founded in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in January 2000, Zipcar quickly established the commercial Station-Based model in the United States. The subsequent decade brought profound technological disruption via smartphones and GPS. This led to the introduction of the highly flexible Free-Floating (One-Way) model around 2008/2009 (pioneered by services like Car2go), allowing users to pick up and drop off vehicles anywhere within a defined service zone. At the same time, the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) model emerged, pioneered by platforms like Turo and Getaround, which expanded the accessible fleet by allowing private car owners to rent out their personal vehicles . Several car rental companies launched their own car sharing services beginning in 2008, including Avis on Location by Avis, Hertz on Demand (formerly known as Connect by Hertz [8] ), operating in the U.S. and Europe; Uhaul Car Share owned by U-Haul, and WeCar by Enterprise Rent-A-Car. [9] In 2010 Zipcar accounted for 80% of the U.S. car sharing market [9] [10] and half of all car-sharers worldwide. [11]

In the mid-2010s, car-sharing was becoming an international transportation trend, especially in metropolitan areas. [12] Car sharing also spread to other nations, including Brazil, Mexico, Turkey (Algita, Mobilizm, and YoYo), China, and India. Zarcar, founded in Rio de Janeiro in 2009, was the first car-sharing system in South America. [13] According to Moscow's authority, the number of carsharing journeys in the city averaged 30,000 a day between January and September 2018. [14]

The main factors driving the growth of carsharing were the rising levels of congestion faced by city dwellers, shifting generational mindsets about car ownership, the increasing costs of personal vehicle ownership and a convergence of business models. [15] [16]

2020s and future projections: Global scale and electric integration

Today car sharing operates on a large global scale, driven by rising traffic congestion, digital technologies, and a shift away from individual car ownership. All commercial models of car sharing - Station-Based, Free-Floating, P2P - coexist and are rapidly integrating technology like AI for fleet management. The global market size for car sharing, valued at approximately US$7.3 billion in 2024, is projected to reach over $11 billion by 2032, with the Asia-Pacific region (particularly China) holding the largest market share (40% in 2024). Furthermore, a major industry trend is the increasing adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs), supported by governments and consumer demand for sustainable transportation. [17]

One report predicts global car sharing membership to grow to 138.3 million by the end of 2029 and a total car sharing fleet of about 755,000 cars. The corporate carsharing market is forecasted to reach about 270,000 vehicles in 2029. [18]

Types of car sharing

Car sharing programs can either be commercial business-to-consumer (B2C) or peer-to-peer (P2P). Within commercial car sharing schemes (also known as car clubs), the most prominent models are Station-Based (round-trip) and Free-Floating (one way, A-to-B).

Business-to-consumer

Traffic signs for car sharing and charging parking for e-cars in Germany. Verkehrszeichen Car-Sharing und Ladeparkplatz 20220516 160434.jpg
Traffic signs for car sharing and charging parking for e-cars in Germany.

Station-based car sharing

With station-based (or round-trip) car sharing, the cars are permanently stationed at designated stations, typically reserved parking spaces. Members pick up the vehicle at the station, and must return it there. The car must usually be reserved for a specific amount of time in advance, and must be returned before that time ends. Payment is usually both by the hour, and by the distance driven. In exchange, a vehicle can be reserved days or weeks in advance, and it is often possible to reserve a specific type of vehicle, such as one with more seats or greater cargo capacity.

One-way/free-floating car sharing

Enjoy car sharing vehicles parked at an Enjoy Point station in Italy. Foto Enjoy 2024.jpg
Enjoy car sharing vehicles parked at an Enjoy Point station in Italy.
Evo car sharing in Canada. Evo Car Sharing (48118258733).jpg
Evo car sharing in Canada.

One-way car sharing enables users to begin and end their trip at different locations through free floating zones or station-based models with designated parking locations. [19] As of 2017, free-floating car sharing is available in 55 cities and 20 countries worldwide, with 40,000 vehicles and serving 5.6 million users, with Europe and North America representing the majority of the market. In Europe, free floating services took up more than 65 percent in car sharing membership. [20]

The service is expected to reach 14.3 million users with more than 100,000 vehicles by the end of 2022. [21]

Corporate car sharing

In corporate car sharing, the company shares the vehicles and allows multiple employees (rather than just one) to make use of a company car, at times when they actually need it. The vehicles are made available from a corporate car sharing pool, and shared for a fixed or flexible period of time. [22] One shared car could replace up to 8 non-shared cars. However, car-sharing does involves an additional processing and associated costs. [23] Still, it reduces fleet-related costs over the long term and allow employees to save not only on costs but also on time. [24] [ clarification needed ]

Peer-to-peer car sharing

POD cars in Hebden Bridge, UK. POD is a community-owned car club run by local volunteers. 2 of POD's shared transport club cars in Bridge Lanes car park.png
POD cars in Hebden Bridge, UK. POD is a community-owned car club run by local volunteers.

Peer-to-peer car sharing, sometimes referred to as P2P or Personal Vehicle Sharing, [19] operates similarly to round-trip car sharing in trip and payment type. However, the vehicles themselves are typically privately owned or leased with the sharing system operated by a third-party.

Fractional ownership

Fractional ownership allows users to co-own a vehicle and share its costs and use. [25] Neighborhood fractional ownership car sharing is often promoted as an alternative to owning a car where public transit, walking, and cycling can be used most of the time and a car is only necessary for out-of-town trips, moving large items, or special occasions. It can also be an alternative to owning multiple cars for households with more than one driver. [26]

Technology

The operation of a modern carsharing service is entirely dependent on technology that connects the vehicles to a central software platform and the user. While early systems used manual logbooks and key boxes, current services are almost entirely automated through fleet digitalization. [27] The core components of the technology are:

The in-vehicle device also collects telemetry data, such as the distance traveled and the duration of the trip, which is automatically sent back to the central server for billing purposes, completing the self-service process.

Environmental and social impacts

Traffic in Delhi, India. Car sharing can help reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality. Trafficjamdelhi.jpg
Traffic in Delhi, India. Car sharing can help reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality.

Transport is one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions. To meet climate targets, car use needs to decline significantly, meaning fewer vehicles on the road and less driving overall (UNFCCC, 2021). [29] Car sharing, often organised through car clubs, has emerged as an alternative to private car ownership and a way to reduce car dependency.

Most studies suggest that car sharing results in a range of benefits including traffic congestion, air quality improvements and reductions in carbon footprints. [30] The primary mechanisms are that fewer cars are needed to service demand (lowering production emissions) and that, once people give up owning a car, they use other forms of transport more with the carshare vehicle used occasionally. The existence and size of any gains depend on the design of the system (Station-based performs better than One way) and the travel behaviour of the participants before and after. [31] If people have already significantly reduced their car miles driven before giving up their car then the gains are smaller. Similarly, some people can access cars who previously would not have done so.

Car clubs specifically have been shown to lower car ownership and usage since their introduction in Europe and North America in the late 1980s. [31] Early studies found that many members sold their cars or delayed buying one after joining. [32] [33] [34] [35] A major review of 25 studies estimated that 20% of members gave up a car and 40% avoided buying a new one, with each shared car replacing about five private vehicles. [36] Later research suggests even greater impact: 9–13 cars per shared vehicle in North America [37] and 14–32 in the UK. [38] Car clubs often replace second household cars and encourage members to drive less and use public transport more. [39] [40] [41] Unlike carpooling or peer-to-peer sharing, car clubs operate fleets that are centrally managed by commercial providers. Thanks to newer vehicles and reduced driving, car clubs can cut carbon emissions by up to 18%. [42] [39] Members typically report driving 40–60% fewer miles, with over a quarter reducing annual mileage by more than half. [43] [36]

Difference from traditional car rentals

Blue Car-sharing street markings in Bremen, Germany. Car-sharing station on Woltmershauserstrasse in Bremen, Germany.jpg
Blue Car-sharing street markings in Bremen, Germany.

Car sharing differs from traditional car rentals in the following ways:

Yandex.Drive, the largest car sharing operator in Russia, uses mobile fuel trucks to refuel its vehicle fleet. Zapravka Iandeks.Draiv v Kotel'nikakh.jpg
Yandex.Drive, the largest car sharing operator in Russia, uses mobile fuel trucks to refuel its vehicle fleet.

With car sharing, individuals have access to private cars without having costs and responsibilities associated with car ownership (except for fractional ownerships). [45] Some car share operations (CSOs) cooperate with local car rental firms, in particular in situations wherein classic rental may be the cheaper option.

The insurance policies on carsharing greatly varies among companies, but all car sharing firms provide insurance that at least meets the legal minimum requirements for the given region of operation.[ citation needed ] Rob Lieber of The New York Times has criticized car sharing firms such as Zipcar for the paltry coverage afforded car sharing drivers. [46]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 Shaheen, Susan A.; Sperling, Daniel; Wagner, Conrad (1 September 1999). "A Short History of Carsharing in the 90's". Journal of World Transport Policy & Practice. 5 (3): 18–40.
  2. Shaheen, Susan; Sperling, Daniel; Wagner, Conrad (2001). "Carsharing in Europe and North American: Past, Present, and Future". UC Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center.
  3. 1 2 Van Audenhove, F.J; Tauvel, M; Chow, D; Wu, F; Phillips, S; Batzner, A (5 February 2024). "Sharing in success: How car sharing can deliver on its potential in an ecosystem play". www.adlittle.com. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
  4. 1 2 Shaheen, Susan A.; Cohen, Adam P. (January 2008). "Growth in Worldwide Carsharing: An International Comparison". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1992 (1): 81–89. doi:10.3141/1992-10. ISSN   0361-1981.
  5. Janes, Danielle; Bryant, Greg (1994). "The early days of car-sharing". www.rainmagazine.com (15-1 ed.). RAIN. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
  6. Shaheen, Susan A.; Cohen, Adam; Chung, Melissa (2009). "North American Carsharing: A Ten-Year Retrospective". Transportation Research Record. 2010: 35–44.
  7. "Car-sharing startup Getaround raises $300 million in funding led by SoftBank". Reuters.com. 21 August 2018. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
  8. Loveday, Eric (20 July 2011). "Hertz on Demand is a bit like ZipCar without membership fees". Autoblog Green. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  9. 1 2 Belson, Ken (10 September 2010). "Car Sharing: Ownership by the Hour". New York Times. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  10. "Wheels when you need them". The Economist. 2 September 2010. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  11. "The connected car". The Economist. 4 June 2009. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  12. Prieto, Marc; Baltas, George; Stan, Valentina (1 July 2017). "Car sharing adoption intention in urban areas: What are the key sociodemographic drivers?". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 101: 218–227. Bibcode:2017TRPA..101..218P. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.012. ISSN   0965-8564.
  13. Dhingra, Chhavi; Stanich, Rebecca (28 May 2013). "Car-Sharing Picking Up Speed in the Developing World". Sustainable Cities Collective. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  14. "Moscow Residents Turn to Car-Sharing After Parking Crackdown". Themoscowtimes.com. 10 December 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  15. Martin, Richard (22 August 2013). "Carsharing Services Will Surpass 12 Million Members Worldwide by 2020". Navigant Consulting. Archived from the original on 10 February 2016. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  16. Navigant Research (22 August 2013). "Navigant forecasts global carsharing services to grow to $6.2B by 2020". Green Car Congress. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  17. "Carsharing Market Size & Share Analysis - Trends, Drivers, Competitive Landscape, and Forecasts (2025 - 2032)". P&S Intelligence. 2024. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
  18. Wood, Laura (19 June 2025). "Carsharing Telematics Market Report 2025: Global Carsharing Fleet Forecasted to Hit 755,000 by 2029, Carsharing Membership to Surge to 138 Million by 2029 - ResearchAndMarkets.com". Bussiness Wire. Retrieved 17 December 2025.
  19. 1 2 Shaheen, Susan; Chan, Nelson; Bansal, Apaar; Cohen, Adam (November 2015). "Shared Mobility: Definitions, Industry Developments, and Early Understanding" (PDF). Innovative Mobility Research.
  20. "BMW–Daimler tie-up to bring 'largest free-floating car sharing provider'". Fleet World. 4 March 2019. Retrieved 1 April 2019.
  21. "Berg Insight: Carsharing service membership reached 23.8 million worldwide in 2017 | the internet of things". www.theinternetofthings.eu. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 1 April 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  22. Corporate car sharing
  23. Corporate car sharing requires a change of attitude
  24. Corporate car sharing
  25. Martin, Elliot; Shaheen, Susan (July 2016). "The Impacts of Car2go on Vehicle Ownership, Modal Shift, Vehicle Miles Traveled, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: An Analysis of Five North American Cities" (PDF). Innovative Mobility Research.
  26. Cervero, Robert; Golub, Aaron; Nee, Brendan (2007). "City CarShare: Longer-Term Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts". Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
  27. Cohen, B.; Kietzmann, J. (2014). "Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy". Organization & Environment. 27 (3): 279–296.
  28. Martin, E.; Shaheen, S. (2016). "The Impacts of Car2go on Vehicle Ownership, Modal Shift, Vehicle Miles Traveled, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions". Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 47: 279–296.
  29. UNFCCC (2021). Climate Action Pathway: Transport (PDF). UNFCC.
  30. Arbeláez Vélez, Ana María (3 May 2024). "Environmental impacts of shared mobility: a systematic literature review of life-cycle assessments focusing on car sharing, carpooling, bikesharing, scooters and moped sharing". Transport Reviews. 44 (3): 634–658. doi:10.1080/01441647.2023.2259104. ISSN   0144-1647. PMC   10962713 . PMID   38533448.
  31. 1 2 Becker, Henrik; Ciari, Francesco; Axhausen, Kay W. (March 2017). "Comparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 97: 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.004. ISSN   0965-8564.
  32. Walb, Carol; Loudon, William; United States; Cambridge Systematics (1986). Evaluation of the Short-Term Auto Rental (STAR) Service in San Francisco, CA. UMTA/TSC evaluation series. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration.
  33. Cervero, Robert (2003). "City CarShare: First-Year Travel Demand Impacts". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1839 (1): 159–166. doi:10.3141/1839-18. ISSN   0361-1981.
  34. Katzev, Richard (2003). "Car Sharing: A New Approach to Urban Transportation Problems". Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 3 (1): 65–86. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00015.x. ISSN   1529-7489.
  35. Lane, Clayton (2005). "PhillyCarShare: First-Year Social and Mobility Impacts of Carsharing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1927 (1): 158–166. doi:10.1177/0361198105192700118. ISSN   0361-1981.
  36. 1 2 Millard-Ball, A; Murray, G; ter Schure, J; Fox, J; Burkhardt, J (2005). Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board. ISBN   978-0-309-08838-1.
  37. Martin, Elliot; Shaheen, Susan A.; Lidicker, Jeffrey (2010). "Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2143 (1): 150–158. doi:10.3141/2143-19. ISSN   0361-1981.
  38. CoMoUK (2023). CoMoUK Annual Car Vlub Report: UK 2023. CoMoUK.
  39. 1 2 Nijland, Hans; van Meerkerk, Jordy (2022). "Mobility and environmental impacts of car sharing in the Netherlands". Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 23: 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.02.001. ISSN   2210-4224.
  40. Jain, Taru; Rose, Geoffrey; Johnson, Marilyn (2022). "Changes in private car ownership associated with car sharing: gauging differences by residential location and car share typology". Transportation. 49 (2): 503–527. doi:10.1007/s11116-021-10184-6. ISSN   0049-4488.
  41. Rodier, Caroline; Randall, Creighton; Garcia Sanchez, Juan Carlos; Harrison, Makenna; Francisco, Jerel; Tovar, Angelly (1 February 2022). "Challenges and Opportunities for Publicly Funded Electric Vehicle Carsharing". National Center for Sustainable Transportation. doi:10.7922/G29C6VRC.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  42. Cairns, S.; Harmer, C. (2 March 2012). The Emission Impacts of Car Clubs in London. Transport Research Laboratory.
  43. Litman, Todd (2000). "Evaluating Carsharing Benefits". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1702 (1): 31–35. doi:10.3141/1702-04. ISSN   0361-1981.
  44. Frolov, Andrey (8 August 2018). "Каршеринг "Яндекс.Драйв" договорился о поглощении стартапа мобильной заправки машин "Топливо в бак" – Транспорт на vc.ru". vc.ru.
  45. Shaheen, Susan; Sperling, Daniel; Wagner, Conrad (Summer 1998). "Carsharing in Europe and North America: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Transportation Quarterly. pp. 35–52. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  46. Lieber, Ron (22 April 2011). "Consider the Worst Case With Zipcar". The New York Times.