Feminism in Chile

Last updated
Chilean women protest against the Pinochet regime. Feministas en lucha anti Pinochet (de Kena Lorenzini).jpg
Chilean women protest against the Pinochet regime.

Feminism in Chile has its own liberation language and activist strategies for rights that is shaped by the political, economic, and social system of Chile. Beginning in the 19th century, Chilean women have been organizing with aspirations of asserting their political rights. [1] These aspirations have had to work against the reality that Chile is one of the most socially conservative countries in Latin America. [2] The Círculo de Estudios de la Mujer (Women's Studies Circle) is one example of a pioneering women's organization during the Pinochet dictatorship (1973–1989) which redefined women's responsibilities and rights, linking “mothers’ rights” to women's rights and women's civil liberties. [3] The founding members of the Círculo de Estudios de La Mujer consisted of a small group of Santiago feminists who were from the Academia de Humanismo Cristiano. These women gathered "to discuss the situation of women in Chile," their first meeting drew a crowd of over 300 participants and from there challenged the authoritarian life in Santiago. These women helped shape the rights for women in Chile. [4]

Contents

Early history of feminism in Chile

With the strong influence of Catholicism in Chile, some of the first feminist movements ironically came from socially conservative women. In 1912, upper-class women began to advocate for working-class women in a way that was favorable to conservative groups of the time. [5] The first female organizations that came to be in Chile started around 1915, but unlike many other countries and their groups, these women were most likely to be in the upper middle class. [6] As such, they were largely able to put together these groups where exploration of the interest in feminism came to be by shedding particular light on the issues that middle to upper-class feminists found to be the most important. One of the earliest examples of this in Chilean history occurred on June 17, 1915, when a young university student, and later a diplomat and suffragist, named Amanda Labarca decided to start a group called the Círculo de Lectura, where she was able to promote Chilean culture towards women. [7] With this, she was able to bring together positivity and change within the women in her community because she strived to ensure that all women could be given a chance to have their voices heard, through education, regardless of their affiliations and social status. [8] Early feminism in Chile also took notes on the international feminist mobilizations, while catering to Chile's specific culture. For example, feminists such as Amanda Labarca promoted a domestic form of feminism which was sensitive to the socially and politically conservative governmental powers of the time. [9] Generally speaking, this was what was seen as the beginning of first-wave feminism amongst Chilean women. [10]

History

The most compactly organized feminist movement in South America in the early 20th century was in Chile.[ citation needed ] There were three large organizations which represented three different classes of people: the Club de Señoras of Santiago represented the more prosperous women; the Consejo Nacional de Mujeres represented the working class, such as schoolteachers; other laboring women organized another active society for the improvement of general educational and social conditions. [11] The Circulo de Lectura de Señoras was founded in 1915 in Santiago Chile by Delia Matte de Izquierdo. [12] Only one month later, the Club de Señoras was created and founded by Amanda Labarca. [13] Women such as Amanda Labarca were particularly successful in their feminist efforts mainly due to some of their international contacts and experiences resulting from studying abroad. [9]

While Chile was very conservative socially and ecclesiastically during this time, its educational institutions were opened to women since around the 1870s. When Sarmiento as an exile was living in Santiago, he recommended the liberal treatment of women and their entrance into the university. This latter privilege was granted while Miguel Luis Amunategui was minister of education. In 1859, when a former minister of education opened a contest for the best paper on popular education, Amunategui received the prize. Among the things which he advocated in that paper was the permitting of women to enter the university, an idea which he had received from Sarmiento. The development of women's education was greatly delayed by the war between Chile, Peru, and Bolivia. President Balmaceda was a great friend of popular education. Under him, the first national high school, or "liceo," for girls was opened, about 1890. This first wave of feminism began in about 1884. [14] Chile was one of the first Latin American countries to admit women to institutions of higher education as well as to send women abroad to study. [9] By the 1920s, there were 49 national "liceos" for girls, all directed by women. Besides these, there were two professional schools for young women in Santiago and one in each Province. [11]

The Consejo Nacional de Mujeres maintained a home for girls attending the university in Santiago, and helped the women students in the capital city. There were nearly a 1,000 young women attending the University of Chile in the early 20th century. The conservative element of this club focused primarily on pursuing women's intellectual work, while later on, Consejo Nacional took more progressive ideas into account. Their members consisted of impressive middle class, aristocratic, woman who had a great deal of influence on their communities, including government and private sectors. [13] Labarca wrote several interesting volumes— such as, Actividades femeninas en Estados Unidos (1915), and ¿A dónde va la mujer? (1934). She was accompanied in her work by a circle of women, most, of whom were connected with educational work in Chile. Several women's periodicals were published in Chile during this period, one of note being El Pefleca, directed by Elvira Santa Cruz. [11] Labarca is perhaps considered one of Chile's most prominent feminist leaders.

In a 1922 address given before the Club de Señoras of Santiago, Chilean publisher Ricardo Salas Edwards stated the following: "There have been manifested during the last 25 years phenomena of importance that have bettered woman's general culture and the development of her independence. Among them were the spread of establishments for the primary and secondary education of women; the occupations that they have found themselves as the teachers of the present generation, which can no longer entertain a doubt of feminine intellectual capacity; the establishment of great factories and commercial houses, which have already given her lucrative employment, independent of the home; the organization of societies and clubs; and, finally, artistic and literary activities, or the catholic social action of the highest classes of women, which has been developed as a stimulus to the entire sex during recent years." [11]

Amanda Labarca initially thought that asking for suffrage in Chile was inappropriate. In 1914, she wrote, "I am not a militant feminist, nor am I a suffragist, for above all I am Chilean, and in Chile today the vote for women is out of order." [9] This sentiment began to change as the post-World War I economic crisis hit, and more and more women were pushed into the working class. In order to complement this new economic responsibility, women began to fight for political, legal, and economic rights. In 1919, Labarca transformed the Ladies Reading Circle into the National Women's Council, which was informed by international women's councils. [9] A new political body was formed in the early 1920s under the name of the Progressive Feminist Party with the purpose of gaining all the rights claimed by women. The platform was:

  1. The right to the municipal and parliamentary vote and to eligibility for office.
  2. The publishing of a list of women candidates of the party for public offices.
  3. The founding of a ministry of public welfare and education, headed by a woman executive, to protect women and children and to improve living conditions. [15]

The founders of the party (middle-class women) carried on a quiet and cautious campaign throughout the country. No distinction was made between the social positions of party adherents, the cooperation of all branches of feminine activity being sought to further the ends of the party. The press investigated public opinion regarding the new movement. Congress had already received favorably a bill to yield civil and legal rights to women. The greatest pressure was brought to bear to obtain the concession of legal rights to women to dispose of certain property, especially the product of their own work, and the transference to the mother, in the father's absence, of the power to administer the property of the child and the income therefrom until the minor's majority. It was understood that concession of these rights would elevate the authority of the mother and bring more general consideration for women, as well as benefits to family life and social welfare. [15]

One group that stands out in particular as a historical cornerstone of feminism in Chile[ according to whom? ] is the Movement for the Emancipation of Chilean Women (MEMCh). Founded in 1935 by influential feminists such as Marta Vergara, MEMCh fought for the legal, economic, and reproductive emancipation of women as well as their community involvement to improve social conditions. [9] MEMCh produced an inspiring monthly bulletin (La Mujer Nueva) that contextualized the work being done in Chile with international feminism. While feminism in Chile of a decade earlier had focused on more nationalistic and religious goals, MEMCh initiated a connectedness between South and North American women, in defense of democracy.

In December 1948, the Chilean Congress had approved a bill granting full political rights to the women of Chile. [9]

During Pinochet's dictatorship throughout the late 1970s and early 1980s, coalitions and federations of women's groups—not all of which necessarily designated themselves in name as feminists—gathered in kitchens, living rooms, and other non-political arenas to devise strategies of bringing down the dictator's rule. During his presidency, the second wave of feminism was occurring. [14] Because political movements, mostly male-dominated, were oppressed nearly out of existence during the dictatorship, women gathered in a political manner outside of what was traditionally male. Through this they created grassroots organizations such as Moviemento pro emancipación de la Mujer that is credited with directly influencing the downfall of Pinochet. [16] Pinochet's rule also involved mass exile—an estimation of over 200,000 by 1980. While Chilean women were living in exile in Vancouver, Canada, a feminist magazine created by Latinas, called Aquelarre began to circulate widely. [17]

There were a variety of reasons that women sought to gain more freedom. One of the reasons consisted on the fact that Chilean women were trying to mirror the independence that women had in North America during the Industrial era. Women were eager to work, and make money. However, there was a very large belief that if women worked, then households would fall apart. Some of the strategic preferences that allowed for women's rights was autonomy, double militancy, and integration.

Even within the feminist community in Chile, there is an overall disagreement as to how feminism has been affected by democracy post dictatorship. Even though more feminist policies were put in place during the 1990s, feminists paradoxically largely lost their voices politically. This reconfiguration of the feminist movement post dictatorship has posed certain challenges to the advancement of feminist ideals. There has been a general trend towards disregarding this moment in the history of feminism in Chile even though there were significant organizations who continued to work towards liberation. [18] In the 1990s, there was often a dichotomy between groups that worked within institutions to instill change, and those who wanted to distance their motives as far away from the patriarchy as possible. While the privileged professors of newly established gender and women's studies programs in universities were given more of a say, the average citizens found that their voices were often muffled and restrained by institutionalized feminism. [19]

Chile made marital rape illegal in 1999. [20]

More recently, the Chilean women's movements continue to advocate for their rights and participation in all levels of the democratic society and through non-governmental organizations. Similarly, a large political barrier for women was broken when Michelle Bachelet became Chile's first female president. Laura Albornoz was also delegated as Minister of Women's Affairs during Bachelet's first term as president. This position's duties includes running the Servicio Nacional de la Mujer or the National Women's Service. Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (SERNAM) - protects women's legal rights in the public sector. In the beginning of its creation, some opinions were that SERNAM organization was said to have weakened the women's rights agenda due because it wasn't successful at policy influence. The organization was later found to be successful at creating programs and legislation that promoted the protection of women's rights at work, school and worked to criminalize domestic violence and protection. [21] The success of this organization is debated, but it has made substantial moves to publicize the issues women face across Chile.

Motherhood has also been an important aspect of the feminist movement in Chile. Due to the vast influence of Catholicism in the country, the first (1940s) women's centers for mothering began with religious motives. Most of these centers, however, were catered to upper-class women, leaving the poorest women the least supported. The CEMA Chile  [ es ] (Center for Mothers) was created in 1954, to "provide spiritual and material well-being to the Chilean women". [22] CEMA worked, more so than other women's centers, to provide services for underprivileged women in Chile. [23] Through motherhood, the Chilean woman has been politicized- not only is she ridiculed for overpopulating a country while given minimal means of reproductive support, but she is also taken as a passive object of governance. [24]

The parity promoted by Bachelet did not survive her. Half of the ministries in her first government were occupied by women; in her successor's team, Sebastián Piñera, they barely reached 18%. [25]

Women's access to voting in Chile

Chile has been considered one of the most socially conservative countries in Latin America.[ by whom? ] This has been exemplified by women's struggle to gain freedom in terms of voting. The Chilean government esteems Catholicism, which puts women in a patriarchal, domesticated setting, and has been used as reasoning for restricting women's rights. Even though the first woman (Domitila Silva Y Lepe) voted in 1875, voting was still considered a barrier well into the 1900s to women's rights in Chile. [26] By 1922, Graciela Mandujano and other women founded the Partido Cívico Femenino (Women's Civic Party) which focused on women getting the right to vote.[ citation needed ] Women formally gained the right to vote in 1949. [27] During that time, women and men voted in separate polling stations due to an effort to provide women with less influence on their preferences. [27] Women also tended to vote more conservatively than men, demonstrating the influence of religion on voting preferences. [27] Although most organizations dissolved after suffrage was granted, Partido Femenino Chileno (Chilean Women's Party), founded by María de la Cruz in 1946, continued to grow and work for more women's rights throughout the years. [28] Chilean women's influence on politics has been demonstrated through multiple occasions during presidential elections - for example, had women not voted in the 1958 election, Salvador Allende would have won. [29] During Chile's dictatorship (1973-1990), developments in regards to women's rights stalled comparatively. This did not stop some feminist groups from speaking out, however, as exemplified by the women's march of 1971 against Salvador Allende. This march had long-lasting effects, particularly by establishing women's role in politics, and turning the day of the march into National Women's Day. [30] Post dictatorship, women paradoxically also seemed to lose their voice politically. [19] With a more recent surge in feminism in Chile, the first female leader, Michelle Bachelet, became the 34th president in 2006–2010. While not immediately re-electable for the next election, she was appointed the first executive director of United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women). On March 11, 2014, she became the 36th president, beginning her second term.

Leaders of the feminist movement in Chile

Julieta Kirkwood, born in 1937, was considered[ by whom? ] the founder of the feminist movement of the 1980s and an instigator of the organization of gender studies at universities in Chile. After studying at the University of Chile, she was influenced by the 1968 revolution in France. At the core of her ideologies was the mantra, ‘There is no democracy without feminism”. [31] Influenced by the ideologies of sociologist Enzo Faletto  [ es; pt ], she contributed to FLACSO’s theoretical framework of rebellious practices in the name of feminism. Kirkwood not only theorized, but also practiced a life full of activism – being a part of MEMCh 83 as well as the Center for Women's Studies. She also wrote opinionated pieces in a magazine called Furia . Her book, Ser política en Chile, framed how academia has contributed to the social movements of the 1980s. [1] She argued for equal access to scientific knowledge for women, as well as advocating for a more just educational system.

Amanda Labarca was one of the pioneering feminists in Chile and paved the way for what feminism is today.[ citation needed ]

2018 feminist wave

The Ni una menos and Me Too movements generated Chilean marches in November 2016, March 2017 and October 2017 to protest violence against women. Following Sebastián Piñera's assumption of the Presidency in March 2018, women's marches and university occupations were expanded from April to June 2018 to protest against machismo, domestic violence and sexual harassment and sexist behaviour in universities and schools, and for abortion rights. [32] [33]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Chile</span> Overview of the status of women in Chile

The lives, roles, and rights of women in Chile have gone through many changes over time. Chilean women's societal roles have historically been impacted by traditional gender roles and a patriarchal culture, but throughout the twentieth century, women increasingly involved themselves in politics and protest, resulting in provisions to the constitution to uphold equality between men and women and prohibit sex discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amanda Labarca</span>

Amanda Labarca Hubertson, was a Chilean diplomat, educator, writer and feminist. Her work was directed mainly at improving the situation of Latin American women and women's suffrage in Chile.

Olga Poblete de Espinosa was a long-time women's rights activist and feminist in Chile. She was a recipient of the Lenin Peace Prize in 1962. Poblete and Elena Caffarena were later honored as "founding matriarchs" by the Movimiento Pro-Emancipación de las Mujeres de Chile of '83 or MEMCH '83. This relates to them being important members of the original MEMCH that existed in the 1940s. Along with women's rights, she was concerned with individual development and welfare issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elena Caffarena</span> Chilean lawyer, jurist and politician

Elena Caffarena Morice was a Chilean lawyer, jurist and politician. Contemporary historians and humanists consider her to be one of the most important 20th-century public figures in Chile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Graciela Mandujano</span> Chilean politician and feminist

Graciela Mandujano (1902–1984) was a Chilean politician and feminist. She was the Chilean official delegate to the Pan-American Conference of Women (1922).

Feminism in Argentina is a set of movements aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights and equal opportunities for women in Argentina. Although some women have been considered precursors—among them Juana Manso and Juana Manuela Gorriti—feminism was introduced to the country as a result of the great European immigration wave that took place in the late 19th and early 20th century. The first feminists did not form a unified movement, but included anarchist and socialist activists, who incorporated women's issues into their revolutionary program, and prestigious freethinker women, who initially fought for access to higher education and, later, legal equality with men. The early 20th century was also full of women fighting for their freedom and rights in the workplace. Despite the efforts of the first-wave feminists, Argentine women did not acquire the right to vote until 1947, during Juan Perón's first government. His highly popular wife, Eva, championed women's suffrage and founded and ran the nation's first large-scale female political party, the Female Peronist Party. Although she refused to identify herself as a feminist, Eva Perón is valued for having redefined the role of women in politics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminism in Latin America</span> Social movement for womens rights

Latin American feminism is a collection of movements aimed at defining, establishing, and achieving equal political, economic, cultural, personal, and social rights for Latin American women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. People who practice feminism by advocating or supporting the rights and equality of women are feminists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">María Rivera Urquieta</span> Chilean professor and feminist

María Rivera Urquieta was a Chilean professor and feminist. She was one of the founding members of the Pro-Emancipation Movement of Chilean Women. She was a lecturer for the Chilean Federation of Feminine Institutions and led one of the conference meetings at the Primer Congreso Interamericano de Mujeres held in Guatemala City, Guatemala in 1947.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aída Parada</span> Chilean educator and feminist

Aída Parada Hernández was a Chilean educator, feminist, founding member of Movimiento Pro-Emancipación de las Mujeres de Chile and the first Chilean delegate to the Inter-American Commission of Women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julieta Kirkwood</span> Chilean sociologist, political scientist, university professor and feminist activist

María Julieta Kirkwood Bañados was a Chilean sociologist, political scientist, university professor and feminist activist. She is considered one of the founders and impellers of the Chilean feminist movement in the 1980s. She is considered the forerunner of Gender studies in Chile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marta Vergara</span>

Marta Vergara Varas was a Chilean author, editor, journalist and women's rights activist. Introduced to international feminism in 1930, she became instrumental in the development of the Inter-American Commission of Women (CIM) helping gather documentation on laws which effected women's nationality. She pushed Doris Stevens to broaden the scope of international feminism to include working women's issues in the quest for equality. A founding member of the Pro-Emancipation Movement of Chilean Women, she was editor of its monthly bulletin La Mujer Nueva. When she was ousted from the Communist Party she moved to Europe and worked as a journalist during the war. At war's end, she returned to Washington, D.C., and worked at the CIM continuing to press for women's suffrage and equality, before returning to Chile, where she resumed her writing career.

Pro-Emancipation Movement of Chilean Women was both a historic women's rights organization, which pressed for equality between 1935 and 1953 and a current umbrella organization reorganized in 1983 to organize other women's organizations to provide unity in the struggle for the country to return to democracy. Once the dictatorship was overturned the NGO turned their focus to uniting organizations which pursue a broad spectrum of issues pertaining to women's rights and development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ximena Morla Lynch</span> Chilean feminist writer and painter

Ximena Morla Lynch (1891–1987), also known as Ximena Morla de Subercaseaux, was a Chilean feminist writer and painter. The daughter of writer Luisa Lynch and conservative politician Carlos Morla Vicuña, she had five siblings, including Carlos, a diplomat, and Carmen, a writer. Her granddaughter is the novelist Elizabeth Subercaseaux.

The Círculo de Estudios de la Mujer, or the Women’s Study Circle, was a Chilean feminist organization that existed from 1979 to 1983. It was formed during the Pinochet dictatorship in Chile as a response to the regime’s oppressive actions against citizens and women. For the Círculo women, the struggle for democracy and for women’s rights went hand-in-hand, and they also aimed to reframe feminism by prioritizing women as individuals, rather than their maternal identities. The Círculo de Estudios de la Mujer was part of a larger women’s movement which worked towards the end of the dictatorship, but they disbanded and formed two splinter groups in 1983.

Judith Astelarra Bonomi is an Argentine sociologist based in Spain where she has specialized in gender studies. In Chile, she contributed to work on agricultural reform in collaboration with the Inter-American Institute of Agricultural Sciences. In 1977, she was appointed Professor of Sociology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona where from 1992, as founder and coordinator of the Seminario de Estudios de la Mujer, she introduced gender studies in Spain. She later served at the university as Dean of the Faculty of Political Science and Sociology. Since the late 1970s, she has published widely on gender studies and feminism.

Women's suffrage in Chile was introduced on the communal level in 1935, and on national level on 8 January 1949. It was the product of a long period of activism, tracing back to 1877, when women were allowed to attend university, a reform which stimulated the formation of a women's movement. The women's suffrage was a reform which was actively promoted since the 1920s by the organizations Consejo Nacional de Mujeres de Chile Comité Nacional pro Derechos de la Mujer, Pro-Emancipation Movement of Chilean Women and Federación Chilena de Instituciones Femeninas (FECHIF).

Federación Chilena de Instituciones Femeninas (FECHIF), was a women's rights organization based in Chile and founded in 1944.

National Council of Women was a women's organization in Chile, founded in 1919. It was one of the first women's organizations in Chile.

Virginia Guzmán Barcos is a Chilean psychologist and sociologist, who was a co-founder of the Flora Tristán Peruvian Women's Center. After completing studies at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile and École pratique des hautes études at the Sorbonne, she went into exile in Peru because of the military dictatorship in Chile. Continuing her studies, she earned a master's degree in Peru and a PhD in Spain. From 1978, she became interested in women's studies and began researching in the area of women and public policy. After twenty years working at the Flora Tristán Peruvian Women's Center, she returned to Chile. Since 2002, she has been the deputy director of the Centro de Estudios de la Mujer in Santiago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporación de Desarrollo de la Mujer La Morada</span> Chilean non-governmental organization

Corporación de Desarrollo de la Mujer La Morada, also known as Casa de la Mujer La Morada, or simply La Morada, is a Chilean non-profit, non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Santiago, that works to expand women's rights through political participation, education, culture and efforts to eradicate violence.

References

  1. 1 2 Miller Klubock, Thomas (2001). "Writing the History of Women and Gender in the Twentieth-Century Chile". Hispanic American Historical Review. 81 (3–4): 493–518. doi:10.1215/00182168-81-3-4-493. S2CID   144382150 via Duke University Press.
  2. Romero, Simon; Bonnefoy, Pascale (2013-12-15). "Chilean Voters Return a Former President to Power". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2018-03-15.
  3. Moone, Jadwiga E. Pieper; Campbell, Jean (March 2009). "Feminist Activism and Women's Rights Mobilization in the Chilean Círculo de Estudios de la Mujer : Beyond Maternalist Mobilization" (PDF). CENTER FOR THE EDUCATION OF WOMEN, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
  4. "Feminist Activism and Women's Rights Mobilization in the Chilean Círculo de Estudios de la Mujer: Beyond Maternalist Mobilization". Archived from the original on 2018-06-15. Retrieved 2016-12-06.
  5. Power, Margaret (2010). Right-Wing Women in Chile: Feminine Power and the Struggle Against Allende, 1964-1973. Pennsylvania State University Press. p. 49. ISBN   9780271046716.
  6. Lavrin, Asunción. Women, Feminism, and Social Change in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, 1890-1940. Lincoln, Neb.: U of Nebraska, 1995. Print.
  7. "Amanda Labarca". icarito.cl. December 1, 2009. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  8. "La Universidad de Chile y su registro en los sellos de Correos de Chile". uchile.cl. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pernet, Corinne A. (November 2000). "Chilean Feminists, the International Women's Movement, and Suffrage, 1915–1950 (Woman Suffrage: The View from the Pacific)". Pacific Historical Review. 69 (4): 663–688. doi:10.2307/3641229. JSTOR   3641229.
  10. Franceschet, Susan. "Explaining Social Movement Outcomes." Comparative Political Studies. Acadia University, 1 June 2004. Web. 5 December 2016.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Pan American Union (1922). Bulletin of the Pan American Union. Vol. 54 (Public domain ed.). The Union. pp. 355–.
  12. "Liberals, Radicals, and Women's Citizenship in Chile, 1872-1930".
  13. 1 2 Verba, Ericka Kim (2010-03-25). "The Círculo de Lectura de Señoras [Ladies' Reading Circle] and the Club de Señoras [Ladies' Club] of Santiago, Chile: Middle- and Upper-class Feminist Conversations (1915-1920)". Journal of Women's History. 7 (3): 6–33. doi:10.1353/jowh.2010.0453. ISSN   1527-2036. S2CID   142381124.
  14. 1 2 Franceschet, Susan (2004-06-01). "Explaining Social Movement Outcomes Collective Action Frames and Strategic Choices in First- and Second-Wave Feminism in Chile". Comparative Political Studies. 37 (5): 499–530. doi:10.1177/0010414004263662. ISSN   0010-4140. S2CID   145122438.
  15. 1 2 Pan American Union (1922), p. 632
  16. Shayne, Julie (2009). They Used To Call Us Witches: Chilean Exiles, Culture, and Feminism. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. p. 22. ISBN   978-0-7391-1849-8.
  17. Shayne, Julie (2014). Taking Risks: Feminist Activism And Research In The Americas. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. p. 62. ISBN   978-1-4384-5245-6.
  18. Tobar, Godoy, Guerrero, Marcela Ríos, Lorena, Elizabeth (2004). ¿Un nuevo silencio feminista? La transformación de un movimiento social en el Chile posdictadura (PDF). Santiago: Centro de Estudios de la Mujer. pp. 1–85.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. 1 2 Tobar, Marcela Ríos (2003). "Chilean Feminism(s) in the 1990s: Paradoxes of an Unfinished Transition". International Journal of Feminist Politics. 5 (2): 256–280. doi:10.1080/1461674032000080594. S2CID   144087061.
  20. "Concluding comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Chile" (PDF). Un.org. Retrieved 2016-07-16.
  21. Franceschet, Susan (2003-01-01). ""State Feminism" and Women's Movements: The Impact of Chile's Servicio Nacional de la Mujer on Women's Activism". Latin American Research Review. 38 (1): 9–40. doi:10.1353/lar.2003.0006. JSTOR   1555433. S2CID   143527153.
  22. Usuario, Super. "CEMA CHILE". www.cemachile.cl (in European Spanish). Archived from the original on 2017-11-13. Retrieved 2018-03-15.
  23. Pieper Mooney, Jadwiga E. (2009). Politics of Motherhood, The: Maternity and Women's Rights in Twentieth-Century Chile. University of Pittsburgh Press. ISBN   9780822973614.
  24. Peña, Alejandro (July 2012). "Ruling the Womb: The Sexual and Reproductive Struggle during the Bachelet Administration". Latin American Perspectives. 39 (4): 145–162. doi:10.1177/0094582X12439047. S2CID   145513465.
  25. "Lo que cambia para las mujeres".
  26. Power, M. (2010). Right-Wing Women in Chile: Feminine Power and the Struggle Against Allende, 1964-1973. Pennsylvania University Press. p. 49. ISBN   9780271046716.
  27. 1 2 3 Lewis, Paul H. (2004). "The 'Gender Gap' in Chile". Journal of Latin American Studies. 36 (4): 719–742. doi:10.1017/s0022216x04008144. JSTOR   3875537. S2CID   144819326.
  28. Nacional, Biblioteca del Congreso. "Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional | Historia Política". bcn.cl. Retrieved 2018-03-07.
  29. Aviel, JoAnn Fagot (1981). "Political Participation of Women in Latin America". The Western Political Quarterly. 34 (1): 156–173. doi:10.2307/447897. JSTOR   447897.
  30. Power, Margaret (2002). Right-wing women in Chile: feminine power and the struggle against Allende, 1964-1973. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. ISBN   978-0-271-02174-4.
  31. "Julieta Kirkwood y los saberes feministas (1937-1985) - Memoria Chilena".
  32. Dessi, Giulia (2018-06-25). "Occupying against the patriarchy". New Internationalist. Retrieved 2018-06-30.
  33. Vergara, Eva (2018-06-28). "A 'Me Too' movement shakes Chilean universities". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2018-06-30.

Sources