Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis

Last updated
Anvil cloud over the Tiwi Islands, Australia Hector cloud from Gunn Point.jpg
Anvil cloud over the Tiwi Islands, Australia

Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis is a physical hypothesis that describes the response of cloud radiative properties to rising surface temperatures. It presumes that the temperature at which radiation is emitted by anvil clouds is constrained by radiative processes and thus does not change in response to surface warming. Since the amount of radiation emitted by clouds is a function of their temperature, it implies that it does not increase with surface warming and thus a warmer surface does not increase radiation emissions (and thus cooling) by cloud tops. The mechanism has been identified both in climate models and observations of cloud behaviour, it affects how much the world heats up for each extra tonne of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. However, some evidence suggests that it may be more correctly formulated as decreased anvil warming rather than no anvil warming.

Contents

Background and hypothesis

In the tropics, the radiative cooling of the troposphere is balanced by the release of latent heat through condensation of water vapour lofted to high altitudes by convection. The radiative cooling is mostly a consequence of emissions by water vapour and thus becomes ineffective above the 200 hPa pressure level. Congruently, it is at this elevation that thick clouds and anvil clouds – the topmost convective clouds – concentrate. [1]

The "fixed anvil temperature hypothesis" stipulates that owing to energetic and thermodynamic constraints imposed by the Clausius-Clapeyron relationship, the temperature and thus radiative cooling of anvil clouds does not change much with surface temperature. [1] Specifically, cooling decreases below −73 °C (200 K) as the ineffective radiative cooling by CO
2 becomes dominant below that temperature. [2] Instead, the elevation of high clouds rises with surface temperatures. [3]

A related hypothesis is that tropopause temperatures are insensitive to surface warming; however it appears to have distinct mechanisms from the fixed anvil temperature process. [4] They have been related to each other in several studies, [5] which sometimes find a fixed tropopause temperature a more reasonable theory than fixed anvil temperature. [6]

Evidence

The fixed anvil temperature hypothesis has been widely accepted and even extended to the non-tropical atmosphere. Its strength relies in part on its reliance on simple physical arguments. [7]

Models

The fixed anvil temperature hypothesis was initially formulated by Hartmann and Larson 2002 in the context of the NCAR/PSU MM5 climate model [8] but the stability of top cloud temperatures was already observed in a one-dimensional model by Hansen et al. 1981. [9] It has also been recovered, with limitations, in climate models [10] and in numerous general circulation models. [11] However, some have recovered a dependence on cloud size [12] and on relative humidity [13] or that the fixed anvil temperature is more properly expressed as anvil temperature changing more slowly than surface temperature. [14] Climate models also simulate an increase in cloud top height [15] and some radiative-convective models apply it to the outflow of tropical cyclones. [16]

The fixed anvil temperature hypothesis has also been obtained in simulations of exoplanet climates. [17] At very high CO
2 concentrations approaching a runaway greenhouse however, other physical effects pertaining to cloud opacity may take over and dominate the fixed anvil temperature as surface temperatures reach extreme levels. [18]

Observations

The fixed anvil temperature hypothesis has been backed by observational studies [19] for large clouds. Smaller clouds however have no stable temperature and there are temperature fluctuations of about 5 °C (9 °F) [20] which may relate to processes involving the Brewer-Dobson circulation. [13] Xu et al. 2007 found that cloud temperatures are more stable for clouds with sizes exceeding 150 kilometres (93 mi). [21] The ascent of cloud top height with warming is also supported by observations. [15] Analyses of convection changes during the El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycle support the hypothesis, stipulating that a moister middle troposphere offsets the effects of less favourable thermodynamics during El Niño. [22]

Implications

Clouds are the second biggest uncertainty in future climate change after human actions, as their effects are complicated and not properly understood. [23] The fixed anvil temperature hypothesis has effects on global climate sensitivity, since anvil clouds are the most important source of outgoing radiation linked to tropical convection [24] and their temperature being stable would render the outgoing radiation non-responsive to surface temperature changes. [25] This creates a positive feedback component of cloud feedback. [26] The fixed anvil temperature hypothesis has also been used to argue that climate modelling should use temperature rather than pressure to model the height of high clouds. [27]

Alternative views

A hypothesis which would have the opposite effect on climate is the iris hypothesis, according to which the coverage of anvil clouds declines with warming, thus allowing more radiation to escape into space and resulting in slower warming. [28] The proportionate anvil warming hypothesis by Zelinka and Hartmann 2010 was formulated on the basis of general circulation models and envisages a small increase of anvil temperature with high warming. [29] The latter hypothesis was intended as a modification to the fixed anvil temperature hypothesis [20] and includes considerations of atmospheric stability and appears to reflect actual climate conditions more closely. [27] Finally, there is a view that cloud top temperatures could actually decrease with surface warming [30] as convection height rises. This may constitute a non-equilibrium response. [31]

Research

As of 2020 further research is needed to properly understand the physics of some cloud feedbacks, [32] as they differ between models, [33] and progress on properly modelling clouds globally is very slow. [23]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate model</span> Quantitative methods used to simulate climate

Numerical climate models are mathematical models that can simulate the interactions of important drivers of climate. These drivers are the atmosphere, oceans, land surface and ice. Scientists use climate models to study the dynamics of the climate system and to make projections of future climate and of climate change. Climate models can also be qualitative models and contain narratives, largely descriptive, of possible futures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloud feedback</span> Type of climate change feedback mechanism

Cloud feedback is a type of climate change feedback, where the overall cloud frequency, height, and the relative fraction of the different types of clouds are altered due to climate change, and these changes then affect the Earth's energy balance. On their own, clouds are already an important part of the climate system, as they consist of water vapor, which acts as a greenhouse gas and so contributes to warming; at the same time, they are bright and reflective of the Sun, which causes cooling. Clouds at low altitudes have a stronger cooling effect, and those at high altitudes have a stronger warming effect. Altogether, clouds make the Earth cooler than it would have been without them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tropopause</span> The boundary of the atmosphere between the troposphere and stratosphere

The tropopause is the atmospheric boundary that demarcates the troposphere from the stratosphere, which are the lowest two of the five layers of the atmosphere of Earth. The tropopause is a thermodynamic gradient-stratification layer that marks the end of the troposphere, and is approximately 17 kilometres (11 mi) above the equatorial regions, and approximately 9 kilometres (5.6 mi) above the polar regions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lapse rate</span> Vertical rate of change of temperature in atmosphere

The lapse rate is the rate at which an atmospheric variable, normally temperature in Earth's atmosphere, falls with altitude. Lapse rate arises from the word lapse. In dry air, the adiabatic lapse rate is 9.8 °C/km. The saturated adiabatic lapse rate (SALR), or moist adiabatic lapse rate (MALR), is the decrease in temperature of a parcel of water-saturated air that rises in the atmosphere. It varies with the temperature and pressure of the parcel and is often in the range 3.6 to 9.2 °C/km, as obtained from the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The environmental lapse rate is the decrease in temperature of air with altitude for a specific time and place. It can be highly variable between circumstances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global dimming</span> Reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching Earths surface

Global dimming is a decline in the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface. It is caused by atmospheric particulate matter, predominantly sulfate aerosols, which are components of air pollution. Global dimming was observed soon after the first systematic measurements of solar irradiance began in the 1950s. This weakening of visible sunlight proceeded at the rate of 4–5% per decade until the 1980s. During these years, air pollution increased due to post-war industrialization. Solar activity did not vary more than the usual during this period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiative forcing</span> Concept for changes to the energy flows through a planetary atmosphere

Radiative forcing is a concept used to quantify a change to the balance of energy flowing through a planetary atmosphere. Various factors contribute to this change in energy balance, such as concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols, and changes in surface albedo and solar irradiance. In more technical terms, it is defined as "the change in the net, downward minus upward, radiative flux due to a change in an external driver of climate change." These external drivers are distinguished from feedbacks and variability that are internal to the climate system, and that further influence the direction and magnitude of imbalance. Radiative forcing on Earth is meaningfully evaluated at the tropopause and at the top of the stratosphere. It is quantified in units of watts per square meter, and often summarized as an average over the total surface area of the globe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloud condensation nuclei</span> Small particles on which water vapor condenses

Cloud condensation nuclei (CCNs), also known as cloud seeds, are small particles typically 0.2 μm, or one hundredth the size of a cloud droplet. CCNs are a unique subset of aerosols in the atmosphere on which water vapour condenses. This can affect the radiative properties of clouds and the overall atmosphere. Water vapour requires a non-gaseous surface to make the transition to a liquid; this process is called condensation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earth's energy budget</span> Concept for energy flows to and from Earth

Earth's energy budget is the balance between the energy that Earth receives from the Sun and the energy the Earth loses back into outer space. Smaller energy sources, such as Earth's internal heat, are taken into consideration, but make a tiny contribution compared to solar energy. The energy budget also takes into account how energy moves through the climate system. The Sun heats the equatorial tropics more than the polar regions. Therefore, the amount of solar irradiance received by a certain region is unevenly distributed. As the energy seeks equilibrium across the planet, it drives interactions in Earth's climate system, i.e., Earth's water, ice, atmosphere, rocky crust, and all living things. The result is Earth's climate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate sensitivity</span> Concept in climate science

Climate sensitivity is a key measure in climate science and describes how much Earth's surface will warm for a doubling in the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration. Its formal definition is: "The change in the surface temperature in response to a change in the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration or other radiative forcing." This concept helps scientists understand the extent and magnitude of the effects of climate change.

The faint young Sun paradox or faint young Sun problem describes the apparent contradiction between observations of liquid water early in Earth's history and the astrophysical expectation that the Sun's output would be only 70 percent as intense during that epoch as it is during the modern epoch. The paradox is this: with the young Sun's output at only 70 percent of its current output, early Earth would be expected to be completely frozen, but early Earth seems to have had liquid water and supported life.

The iris hypothesis was a hypothesis proposed by Richard Lindzen and colleagues in 2001 that suggested increased sea surface temperature in the tropics would result in reduced cirrus clouds and thus more infrared radiation leakage from Earth's atmosphere. His study of observed changes in cloud coverage and modeled effects on infrared radiation released to space as a result seemed to support the hypothesis. This suggested infrared radiation leakage was hypothesized to be a negative feedback in which an initial warming would result in an overall cooling of the surface.

A runaway greenhouse effect will occur when a planet's atmosphere contains greenhouse gas in an amount sufficient to block thermal radiation from leaving the planet, preventing the planet from cooling and from having liquid water on its surface. A runaway version of the greenhouse effect can be defined by a limit on a planet's outgoing longwave radiation which is asymptotically reached due to higher surface temperatures evaporating water into the atmosphere, increasing its optical depth. This positive feedback means the planet cannot cool down through longwave radiation and continues to heat up until it can radiate outside of the absorption bands of the water vapour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outgoing longwave radiation</span> Energy transfer mechanism which enables planetary cooling

In climate science, longwave radiation (LWR) is electromagnetic thermal radiation emitted by Earth's surface, atmosphere, and clouds. It may also be referred to as terrestrial radiation. This radiation is in the infrared portion of the spectrum, but is distinct from the shortwave (SW) near-infrared radiation found in sunlight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hadley cell</span> Tropical atmospheric circulation feature

The Hadley cell, also known as the Hadley circulation, is a global-scale tropical atmospheric circulation that features air rising near the equator, flowing poleward near the tropopause at a height of 12–15 km (7.5–9.3 mi) above the Earth's surface, cooling and descending in the subtropics at around 25 degrees latitude, and then returning equatorward near the surface. It is a thermally direct circulation within the troposphere that emerges due to differences in insolation and heating between the tropics and the subtropics. On a yearly average, the circulation is characterized by a circulation cell on each side of the equator. The Southern Hemisphere Hadley cell is slightly stronger on average than its northern counterpart, extending slightly beyond the equator into the Northern Hemisphere. During the summer and winter months, the Hadley circulation is dominated by a single, cross-equatorial cell with air rising in the summer hemisphere and sinking in the winter hemisphere. Analogous circulations may occur in extraterrestrial atmospheres, such as on Venus and Mars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atlantic multidecadal oscillation</span> Climate cycle that affects the surface temperature of the North Atlantic

The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), also known as Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV), is the theorized variability of the sea surface temperature (SST) of the North Atlantic Ocean on the timescale of several decades.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atmosphere of Triton</span> Layer of gasses surrounding the moon Triton

The atmosphere of Triton is the layer of gases surrounding Triton. Like the atmospheres of Titan and Pluto, Triton's atmosphere is composed primarily of nitrogen, with smaller amounts of methane and carbon monoxide. It hosts a layer of organic haze extending up to 30 kilometers above its surface and a deck of thin bright clouds at about 4 kilometers in altitude. Due to Triton's low gravity, its atmosphere is loosely bound, extending over 800 kilometers from its surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solar activity and climate</span> Field of scientific study

Patterns of solar irradiance and solar variation have been a main driver of climate change over the millions to billions of years of the geologic time scale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cold pool</span>

In atmospheric science, a cold pool (CP) is a cold pocket of dense air that forms when rain evaporates during intense precipitation e.g. underneath a thunderstorm cloud or a precipitating shallow cloud. Typically, cold pools spread at 10 m/s and last 2–3 hours. Cold pools are ubiquitous both over land and ocean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convective self-aggregation</span> Atmospheric phenomenon that occurs in idealised simulations

Convective self-aggregation is an atmospheric phenomenon that occurs under idealised homogeneous conditions without external forcing. An unorganized atmosphere with scattered convection spontaneously transitions into a state with a very dry and cloud-free region, and a region with heavy rain and thunderstorms. The aggregated state appears in simulations after 15-100 days and has a length scale of multiple thousand kilometres. In contrast to forced convective organization, self-aggregation is induced by positive feedbacks from the convection itself. Known feedbacks come from radiation, cloud entrainment, cold pools, waves or surface fluxes. These feedbacks facilitate cloud forming near existing clouds and hamper cloud forming distant to clouds. Convective self-aggregation affects the formation of tropical cyclones, rainfall intensity, and the radiative budget through changes in the mean thermodynamic properties. In nature, convective self-aggregation is hard to isolate from forced aggregation and is hence studied mainly in numerical simulations.

"Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a Given Distribution of Relative Humidity" is a scientific article published by Syukuro Manabe and Richard Wetherald in 1967 in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences and dedicated to climate modelling. It is often considered to be the most influential paper in history of climate change science: the climate model that it describes is indeed the first one to address the main physical mechanisms that determine the influence of carbon dioxide on Earth surface temperature through greenhouse effect.

References

  1. 1 2 Hartmann & Larson 2002, p. 1.
  2. ↑ Hartmann & Larson 2002, p. 3.
  3. ↑ Albern, Nicole; Voigt, Aiko; Pinto, Joaquim G. (2019). "Cloud-Radiative Impact on the Regional Responses of the Midlatitude Jet Streams and Storm Tracks to Global Warming". Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 11 (7): 1949. Bibcode:2019JAMES..11.1940A. doi: 10.1029/2018MS001592 . ISSN   1942-2466. S2CID   182771431.
  4. ↑ Hu, Shineng; Vallis, Geoffrey K. (2019). "Meridional structure and future changes of tropopause height and temperature". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 145 (723): 2709. arXiv: 1902.08230 . Bibcode:2019QJRMS.145.2698H. doi:10.1002/qj.3587. ISSN   1477-870X. S2CID   118967908.
  5. ↑ Sullivan, Sylvia C.; Schiro, Kathleen A.; Stubenrauch, Claudia; Gentine, Pierre (2019). "The Response of Tropical Organized Convection to El Niño Warming". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 124 (15): 8490. Bibcode:2019JGRD..124.8481S. doi: 10.1029/2019JD031026 . ISSN   2169-8996.
  6. ↑ Seeley, Jeevanjee & Romps 2019, p. 1849.
  7. ↑ Seeley, Jeevanjee & Romps 2019, p. 1842.
  8. ↑ Hartmann & Larson 2002, p. 2.
  9. ↑ Del Genio 2016, p. 107.
  10. ↑ Igel, Drager & van den Heever 2014, p. 10516.
  11. ↑ Maher, Penelope; Gerber, Edwin P.; Medeiros, Brian; Merlis, Timothy M.; Sherwood, Steven; Sheshadri, Aditi; Sobel, Adam H.; Vallis, Geoffrey K.; Voigt, Aiko; Zurita-Gotor, Pablo (2019). "Model Hierarchies for Understanding Atmospheric Circulation". Reviews of Geophysics. 57 (2): 267. Bibcode:2019RvGeo..57..250M. doi:10.1029/2018RG000607. hdl: 10871/36644 . ISSN   1944-9208. S2CID   146704580.
  12. ↑ Noda et al. 2016, p. 2313.
  13. 1 2 Chae, Jung Hyo; Sherwood, Steven C. (1 January 2010). "Insights into Cloud-Top Height and Dynamics from the Seasonal Cycle of Cloud-Top Heights Observed by MISR in the West Pacific Region". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 67 (1): 259. Bibcode:2010JAtS...67..248C. doi: 10.1175/2009JAS3099.1 . ISSN   0022-4928.
  14. ↑ Seeley, Jeevanjee & Romps 2019, p. 1848.
  15. 1 2 Li, R. L.; Storelvmo, T.; Fedorov, A. V.; Choi, Y.-S. (15 August 2019). "A Positive Iris Feedback: Insights from Climate Simulations with Temperature-Sensitive Cloud–Rain Conversion". Journal of Climate. 32 (16): 5306. Bibcode:2019JCli...32.5305L. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0845.1. hdl: 10852/83101 . ISSN   0894-8755. S2CID   198420050.
  16. ↑ Shi, Xiaoming; Bretherton, Christopher S. (September 2014). "Large-scale character of an atmosphere in rotating radiative-convective equilibrium". Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 6 (3): 616. Bibcode:2014JAMES...6..616S. doi: 10.1002/2014MS000342 .
  17. ↑ Yang, Jun; Leconte, Jérémy; Wolf, Eric T.; Merlis, Timothy; Koll, Daniel D. B.; Forget, François; Abbot, Dorian S. (April 2019). "Simulations of Water Vapor and Clouds on Rapidly Rotating and Tidally Locked Planets: A 3D Model Intercomparison". The Astrophysical Journal. 875 (1): 11. arXiv: 1912.11329 . Bibcode:2019ApJ...875...46Y. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab09f1 . ISSN   0004-637X. S2CID   146053272.
  18. ↑ Ramirez, Ramses M.; Kopparapu, Ravi Kumar; Lindner, Valerie; Kasting, James F. (August 2014). "Can Increased Atmospheric CO2 Levels Trigger a Runaway Greenhouse?". Astrobiology. 14 (8): 723. Bibcode:2014AsBio..14..714R. doi:10.1089/ast.2014.1153. ISSN   1531-1074. PMID   25061956.
  19. ↑ Asrar, Ghassem R.; Hurrell, James W., eds. (2013). Climate Science for Serving Society. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. p. 406. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1. ISBN   978-94-007-6691-4. S2CID   131478611.
  20. 1 2 Noda et al. 2016, p. 2307.
  21. ↑ Noda et al. 2016, p. 2312.
  22. ↑ Takahashi et al. 2024, p. 8.
  23. 1 2 Irfan, Umair (2021-05-19). "Scientists aren't sure what will happen to clouds as the planet warms". Vox. Retrieved 2021-07-05.
  24. ↑ Hartmann & Larson 2002, pp. 1–2.
  25. ↑ Hartmann & Larson 2002, p. 4.
  26. ↑ Del Genio 2016, p. 116.
  27. 1 2 Kluft, Lukas; Dacie, Sally; Buehler, Stefan A.; Schmidt, Hauke; Stevens, Bjorn (1 December 2019). "Re-Examining the First Climate Models: Climate Sensitivity of a Modern Radiative–Convective Equilibrium Model". Journal of Climate. 32 (23): 8121. Bibcode:2019JCli...32.8111K. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0774.1. hdl: 21.11116/0000-0002-A35E-D . ISSN   0894-8755. S2CID   135038760.
  28. ↑ Seeley, Jacob T.; Jeevanjee, Nadir; Langhans, Wolfgang; Romps, David M. (2019). "Formation of Tropical Anvil Clouds by Slow Evaporation". Geophysical Research Letters. 46 (1): 492. Bibcode:2019GeoRL..46..492S. doi: 10.1029/2018GL080747 . ISSN   1944-8007. S2CID   134486980.
  29. ↑ Zelinka, Mark D.; Hartmann, Dennis L. (16 December 2011). "The observed sensitivity of high clouds to mean surface temperature anomalies in the tropics: Temperature Sensitivity of High Clouds". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 116 (D23): 1. doi:10.1029/2011JD016459.
  30. ↑ Igel, Drager & van den Heever 2014, p. 10530.
  31. ↑ Igel, Drager & van den Heever 2014, p. 10531.
  32. ↑ "Cooling effect of clouds 'underestimated' by climate models, says new study". World Economic Forum. 10 June 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-05.
  33. ↑ Yoshimori, Masakazu; Lambert, F. Hugo; Webb, Mark J.; Andrews, Timothy (2020-04-01). "Fixed Anvil Temperature Feedback: Positive, Zero, or Negative?". Journal of Climate. 33 (7): 2719–2739. Bibcode:2020JCli...33.2719Y. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0108.1 . hdl: 10871/121112 . ISSN   0894-8755.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.