Italian public administration

Last updated

The Italian public administration (in acronym IPA, in italian PA), in the Italian legal system, indicates the set of public bodies belonging to the public administration of the Italian Republic.

Contents

History

With the proclamation of the Kingdom of Italy and the simultaneous adoption of the Albertine Statute, the ownership of the organizing function belonged to the same organization that provided it through acts of self-regulation. Apart from the extreme case of military organization, which gave rise to relations of special supremacy, the organizing function was the responsibility of the government.

After the public administration on the model of the Kingdom of Sardinia for decades had been headed by a new unitary state with centralized management powers (which in fact also conditioned the exercise of the management powers of the few other existing territorial bodies), [1] the Giolitti II Cabinet - with the start of the nationalization of the Italian railways - had adopted the model of the autonomous company, voted to introduce elements of economy in the traditional approach of the public function of French ancestry. [2] The rejection of this model by fascism [3] produced a phenomenon that has remained essentially Italian: "the choice of the alternative model of the public body and the consequent" flight from the administration "that derives from it represent the solution to the contradiction between the demands for a more "efficient" and "industrial" state and the requirements of legality and organizational uniformity: the autonomous company, placed under the direct control of the minister, constitutes only a partial response to this order of problems; entity with its own legal personality already represents a more drastic step towards the establishment of that "parallel bureaucracy" that fascism will increasingly place alongside traditional administration, [4] sanctioning the birth of the autarchic body, and subsequently of the public body cheap.

With the birth of the Italian Republic and the entry into force of the Constitution, articles 97 and 98 of the Charter accepted the opposite solution, attributing the ownership of the organizing function to the Parliament of the Italian Republic, which exercises it through acts of heteronormation, thus sanctioning the absolute primacy of the principle of legality. From the point of view of the organization of the administrative bodies of the State, the Constitution sanctioned the transition from a centralized organization, where the administrative functions were attributed to the central organs of the State, to a decentralized organization, where instead the functions administrative activities are carried out by local authorities at the local level.

The perimeter of the Italian public sector has been redefined several times over time by organic reforms starting after the Second World War, in parallel with the administrative decentralization in Italy in implementation of Articles 5, 114 and 118 of the constitutional charter: among the various norms, the law 16 May 1970, n. 281, and the law 22 July 1975, n. 382 which as a consequence transferred various competences to the municipalities and regions of Italy, the establishment of the general accounting of the State (law 5 August 1978, no. 468), the Provincial Single Treasury Service (law 29 October 1984, no. 720 ), the administrative procedure and access to documents (law 7 August 1990, no. 241), and from the contractualization of public employment in Italy implemented since the 1990s (law 29 March 1983, no. 93 and Legislative Decree February 3, 1993, n. 29) [5] - which introduced the possibility for employees to join trade unions - reforming the entire activity on the basis of various criteria as required by the Bassanini laws. The discipline of the employment relationship was then collected in d. lgs. March 30, 2001, n. 165; finally, the Brunetta reform of 2009 introduced the principle of result-based remuneration, linked to the activity of employees.

Constitutional principles

The principle of legality

Article 97 provides that public offices are organized according to the provisions of the law. Purposes, rights and obligations, powers, limits and instruments of the Italian public administration are defined by the primary rules and by Community law. Its foundation is found directly in art. 113 of the Constitution, which establishes the judicial protection of those having the right or legitimate interest to act against any administrative act.

The Regional Administrative Court can annul an act for violation of the principle of legality, where there is no specific rule that attributes the power exercised through it to the public authority.

The principle of legality has limited the power of ministers vis-à-vis the public administration enshrined in art. 95, in particular for matters subject to legal reserve, with respect to which therefore the administration cannot proceed in the absence of a primary rule. The power of ministers is also subordinate to the principle of legality.

The principle of typicality

Authoritarian powers can only be exercised if, by whom, when and as required by law. The Constitution provides for a specific legal reserve for measures that affect people's freedoms (art. 41, c. 3) and citizens' assets (art. 23).

The art. 113 provides that the compliance of administrative acts with the law must be able to be verified by a judge (so-called "justiciability"). However, the law provides for contingent and urgent ordinances for which the law indicates the conditions and competent bodies, but not the effects of the law (for example the provisions of the mayors in terms of health, construction, hygiene and local police regulations).

The principle of proportionality

It is a principle inherent in the legal system and made explicit by community jurisprudence, for example in the EC Treaty (art. 86, paragraph 2). It affirms that the measures must be preordained, necessary and sufficient for a lawful and legitimate purpose without affecting subjective positions to a greater extent than is objectively indispensable in relation to that purpose.

The principle of subsidiarity

The principle of administrative decentralization was already enshrined in art. 5, in the part of the fundamental principles. The art. 114 established the autonomy principle of decentralized local authorities. The reform of Title V of the Constitution of the Italian Republic attributed to the Municipalities the competence of the administration as a general principle, without prejudice to the principle of adequacy, reflecting those of impartiality and good performance, which legitimized the centralization of certain functions and services at a higher level of administration than the municipal one.

The 2001 reform redistributed legislative power in Italy between the state and the regions and introduced the principle of subsidiarity in the administration. In the intentions of the legislator, it should have started a process of reorganizing the entire public presence in the territory, to strengthen local autonomies, however this has often given rise to conflicts between local administrations and the central State. [6]

Impartiality and "good performance"

In the Republican age, the evolution of the model of public administration carried out by a public body other than the territorial body produced - under the validity of Article 97 of the Constitution [7] - a "pursuit" of public guarantees in the management of human resources, [8] instrumental and financial. [9] It is based on the concept of the administration of results [10] and has as its purpose the full realization of the principles of efficiency and effectiveness, corollaries of the principle of good performance pursuant to art. 97 of the Constitution. [11]

Among the main tools for the pursuit of constitutional purposes there are also the administrative and accounting jurisdiction: the affirmation of the latter also towards companies deriving from the transformation of public economic entities into joint stock companies (as long as the participation remains majority of the State or other public authorities to the share capital) was sanctioned by the Constitutional Court with the sentence of 28 December 1993, n. 466, delivered following a conflict of powers raised by the Court of Auditors. [12]

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

Administrative law is a division of law governing the activities of executive branch agencies of government. Administrative law includes executive branch rule making, adjudication, and the enforcement of laws. Administrative law is considered a branch of public law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Provinces of Italy</span> Second-level administrative divisions of the Italian Republic

The provinces of Italy are the second-level administrative divisions of the Italian Republic, on an intermediate level between a municipality and a region. Since 2015, provinces have been classified as "institutional bodies of second level".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of Defence (Italy)</span> Italian government agency

The Ministry of Defence is the government body of the Italian Republic responsible for military and civil defence matters and managing the Italian Armed Forces. It is led by the Italian Minister of Defence, a position occupied by Guido Crosetto since October 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sabino Cassese</span> Italian professor and former judge (born 1935)

Sabino Cassese is an Italian jurist, former minister for the public function in the Ciampi government (1993–1994), and judge of the Constitutional Court of Italy (2005–2014).

Global administrative law is an emerging field that is based upon a dual insight: that much of what is usually termed “global governance” can be accurately characterized as administrative action; and that increasingly such action is itself being regulated by administrative law-type principles, rules and mechanisms – in particular those relating to participation, transparency, accountability and review. GAL, then, refers to the structures, procedures and normative standards for regulatory decision-making including transparency, participation, and review, and the rule-governed mechanisms for implementing these standards, that are applicable to formal intergovernmental regulatory bodies; to informal intergovernmental regulatory networks; to regulatory decisions of national governments where these are part of or constrained by an international intergovernmental regime; and to hybrid public-private or private transnational bodies. The focus of this field is not the specific content of substantive rules, but rather the operation of existing or possible principles, procedural rules and reviewing and other mechanisms relating to accountability, transparency, participation, and assurance of legality in global governance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maria Rita Saulle</span> Italian judge

Maria Rita Saulle was a professor of law and a judge in the Italian Constitutional Court from November 2005 until her death on 7 July 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Italy</span> Overview of Italian judiciary

The judiciary of Italy is composed of courts responsible for interpreting and applying the law in the Italian Republic. Magistracy is a public office, accessible only to Italian citizens who hold an Italian Juris Doctor and have successfully participated in the relevant competitive public examination organised by the Ministry of justice. The judicial power is independent and there is no internal hierarchy within. Italian magistrates are either judges or public prosecutors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ENIT</span> Italian governmental agency

ENIT—Agenzia nazionale del turismo, known in English as The Italian Government Tourist Board, formerly the Ente Nazionale Italiano per il Turismo is the Italian national tourism board. The national Tourist Board is situated in Rome.

The Ministry of the Interior is a government agency of Italy, headquartered in Rome. It is a cabinet-level ministry of the Italian Republic. As of October 2022, Matteo Piantedosi, former Prefect of Rome, is the minister.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of Economy and Finance (Italy)</span> Italian ministry for economy and finances

The Ministry of Economy and Finance, also known by the acronym MEF, is a ministry of the Italian government. Its responsibilities include overseeing economic policy, public investments and spending. The Ministry's headquarters are located in Rome's historic Palazzo delle Finanze. The current minister in the Meloni Cabinet is Giancarlo Giorgetti.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pietro Ichino</span> Italian politician and academic (born 1949)

Pietro Ichino is an Italian politician and professor of labor law at the University of Milan. From 1979 to 1983, he was an independent left-wing MP belonging to the ranks of the Italian Communist Party. In 2008, he was elected senator for the Democratic Party in the district of Lombardy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Italy</span> Legal system of Italy

The law of Italy is the system of law across the Italian Republic. The Italian legal system has a plurality of sources of production. These are arranged in a hierarchical scale, under which the rule of a lower source cannot conflict with the rule of an upper source.

The Direzione Investigativa Antimafia (DIA), also known as the Anti-Mafia Investigation Division, is an Italian multi-force investigation body under the Department of Public Security of the Ministry of the Interior. Its main task is the fight against the mafia-related organized crime in Italy.

Teleadministration is based on the concept that documents in electronic format have legal value. Administrative informatics is not new, but for many years it was merely Information Technology applied to legal documents, that is, the reproduction of paper-based legal documents into electronic file systems. Instead, Teleadministration turns this approach into its head. It is based on research conducted in 1978, the year when, at a conference promoted by the Court of Cassation, Giovanni Duni launched the then-futuristic idea that an electronic document could have legal value. 1978 was also the year in which the first research on digital signatures (RSA) was published in the United States, yet it would take more than twenty-five years for jurists and mathematicians to start working together.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massimo Severo Giannini</span> Italian politician and jurist

Massimo Severo Giannini (1915–2000) was an Italian politician and jurist. He was Minister from 1979 to 1980. He also was a member of the Accademia dei Lincei and vice president of the Higher Council for Cultural Heritage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Audit (Italy)</span> Italian supreme audit institution

The Court of Audit is an Italian Court of Audit, an institution of constitutional importance, established by Articles 100 & 103 of the Constitution of Italy, which is among the supplementary institutions of the government. The Court of Audit has consultative, review, and jurisdictional functions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gelmini reform</span> Italian educational reform

The Gelmini reform refers to the set of acts of the Italian Republic – issued during the Berlusconi IV Cabinet – concerning the education sector in Italy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of the Republic of Italy</span>

A Ministry of the Republic of Italy is an administrative organ of the Republic of Italy, placed at the top of Italian public administration and is characterised by one or more specific competencies, with an organised structure, often varying over time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Office Against Racial Discrimination</span> Italian state body established in 2003

The National Office Against Racial Discrimination, also known by the acronym UNAR, is an Italian state body with the function of promoting equal treatment and the removal of discrimination based on race or ethnic origin. Active since 2003, it is established at the Presidency of the Council of Ministers. It operates in an autonomous and impartial manner and also deals with the different impact that discrimination can have on women and men, as well as the existence of forms of racism of a cultural and religious nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Santi Romano</span> Italian lawyer and judge (1875–1947)

Santi Romano was an Italian public lawyer, who taught administrative law, constitutional law, ecclesiastical law and international law in several Italian universities. He was President of the Council of State from 1928 to 1944 and Senator of the Kingdom from 1934, as well as member of the Lincean Academy.

References

  1. Audisio, Paolo (1986). "I Kateretidae e i Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) dell'Italia meridionale: distribuzione attuale e ipotesi sul popolamento". Biogeographia. 10. doi: 10.21426/b610110305 . ISSN   1594-7629.
  2. Bottino, Gabriele (2013-03-19). "Brevi considerazioni sulla funzione di verità nel diritto amministrativo". Sociologia del Diritto (1): 137–146. doi:10.3280/sd2013-001010. ISSN   0390-0851.
  3. "Disegno di legge n. 1978 Senato, approvato dalla Camera dei deputati il 18 giugno 2015, in un testo risultante dall'unificazione dei disegni di legge 784, 1343, 1874, 1901, 1983, 1989, 2321 e 2351". Minorigiustizia (4): 75–78. 2016-01-14. doi:10.3280/mg2015-004011. ISSN   1121-2845.
  4. de Grand, Alexander; Melis, Guido; Tranfaglia, Nicola (1991-06-10). "Due Modelli di Amministrazione tra Liberalismo e Fascismo: Burocrazie radixionali e Nuovi Apparati". The American Historical Review. 96 (3): 908. doi:10.2307/2162550. ISSN   0002-8762. JSTOR   2162550.
  5. "D.Lvo 29/93". www.edscuola.it. Retrieved 2021-01-28.
  6. Della Morte, Michele (2016-09-21). "Ragioni e condizioni per una revisione in senso progressista della Costituzione italiana". Democrazia e Diritto (2): 174–188. doi:10.3280/ded2016-002012. ISSN   0416-9565.
  7. Rutigliano, Enzo; Tosini, Domenico (2002-08-01). "Sulla crisi di orientamento della sociologia: alcune riflessioni". Quaderni di Sociologia (29): 91–112. doi: 10.4000/qds.1280 . ISSN   0033-4952.
  8. Muriel, Ramìrez Manuel (2014-07-18). "Il sistema ferroviario britannico nel secondo dopoguerra. La riforma Beeching del 1963". Memoria e Ricerca (45): 157–176. doi:10.3280/mer2014-045009. ISSN   1127-0195.
  9. Celotto, Alfonso (2002-12-01). "Parlamento e poteri legislativi del Governo in Italia: 1' abuso del decreto d'urgenza (decreto-legge)". Derecho PUCP (55): 55–73. doi: 10.18800/derechopucp.200201.003 . ISSN   2305-2546.
  10. Giaconi, Marta (2017-09-27). "Il lavoro nella pubblica amministrazione partecipata da privati". Giornale di Diritto del Lavoro e di Relazioni Industriali (155): 523–565. doi:10.3280/gdl2017-155005. ISSN   1720-4321.
  11. Salvadori, C.; Stergulc, F. (2009). "Indirizzi selvicolturali per il contenimento dei danni da bostrico nelle foreste delle Alpi orientali". Atti del Terzo Congresso Nazionale di Selvicoltura. Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali: 674–679. doi:10.4129/cns2008.093. ISBN   978-88-87553-16-1.
  12. Pennacchietti, Claudia (2014-04-08). "The day after. La sentenza della corte costituzionale sulla legge elettorale". PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro (1): 156–164. doi:10.3280/pri2014-001018. ISSN   0393-9049.