Economic history of Italy

Last updated
Part of a series on the
History of Italy
1839 Monin Map of Ancienne Italy Atlas Universel de Geographie Ancienne and Moderne.jpg

Timeline

Flag of Italy.svg Italyportal

This is a history of the economy of Italy. For more information on historical, cultural, demographic and sociological developments in Italy, see the chronological era articles in the template to the right. For more information on specific political and governmental regimes in Italy, see the Kingdom and Fascist regime articles.

Contents

Until the end of the 16th century, Italy was prosperous relative to other parts of Europe. From the end of the 16th century, Italy stagnated relative to other parts of Europe. [1] By the end of the 19th century, the Italian economy was less advanced than those in Western and Central Europe. [1]

Renaissance

The Italian Renaissance was remarkable in economic development. Venice and Genoa were the trade pioneers, first as maritime republics and then as regional states, followed by Milan, Florence, and the rest of northern Italy. Reasons for their early development are for example the relative military safety of Venetian lagoons, the high population density and the institutional structure which inspired entrepreneurs. [2] The Republic of Venice was the first real international financial center, which slowly emerged from the 9th century to its peak in the 14th century. [3] Tradeable bonds as a commonly used type of security, were invented by the Italian city-states (such as Venice and Genoa) of the late medieval and early Renaissance periods.

17th–middle 19th century

Between 17th and middle 19th century, Italy experienced a decline in relative economic standing. Military conflicts, political fractionalization, limited fiscal capacity and the shift of world trade to north-western Europe and the Americas are factors which slowed down Italian development. [4]

1861–1918

Terni steel mills in 1912. Terni - le Acciaierie 1912.jpg
Terni steel mills in 1912.
Little Italy, Manhattan, New York, ca.1900. Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u edit.jpg
Little Italy, Manhattan, New York, ca.1900.

The economic history of Italy after 1861 can be divided in three main phases: [5] an initial period of struggle after the unification of the country, characterised by high emigration and stagnant growth; a central period of robust catch-up from the 1890s to the 1980s, interrupted by the Great Depression of the 1930s and the two world wars; and a final period of sluggish growth that has been exacerbated by a double-deep recession following the 2008 global financial crush, and from which the country is slowly reemerging only in recent years.

Age of Industrialisation

Prior to unification, the economy of the many Italian statelets was overwhelmingly agrarian; however, the agricultural surplus produced what historians call a "pre-industrial" transformation in North-western Italy starting from the 1820s, [6] that led to a diffuse, if mostly artisanal, concentration of manufacturing activities, especially in Piedmont-Sardinia under the liberal rule of the Count of Cavour. [7]

After the birth of the unified Kingdom of Italy in 1861, there was a deep consciousness in the ruling class of the new country's backwardness, given that the per capita GDP expressed in PPS terms was roughly half of that of Britain and about 25% less than that of France and Germany. [5] During the 1860s and 1870s, the manufacturing activity was backward and small-scale, while the oversized agrarian sector was the backbone of the national economy. The country lacked large coal and iron deposits [8] and the population was largely illiterate. In the 1880s, a severe farm crisis led to the introduction of more modern farming techniques in the Po valley, [9] while from 1878 to 1887 protectionist policies were introduced with the aim to establish a heavy industry base. [10] Some large steel and iron works soon clustered around areas of high hydropower potential, notably the Alpine foothills and Umbria in central Italy, while Turin and Milan led a textile, chemical, engineering and banking boom and Genoa captured civil and military shipbuilding. [11]

However, the diffusion of industrialisation that characterised the northwestern area of the country largely excluded Venetia and, especially, the South. The resulting Italian diaspora involved 29 million Italians (10.2 million of whom returned) between 1860-1985 and 9 million permanently left of 14 million who emigrated between 1876–1914 two thirds of whom were men; by many scholars it is considered the biggest mass migration of contemporary times. [12] During the Great War, the still frail Italian state successfully fought a modern war, being able of arming and training some 5 million recruits. [13] But this result came at a terrible cost: by the end of the war, Italy had lost 700,000 soldiers and had a ballooning sovereign debt amounting to billions of lira.

The agrarian crisis and the Italian diaspora

The unification of Italy in 1861–70 broke down the feudal land system that had survived in the south since the Middle Ages, especially where land had been the inalienable property of aristocrats, religious bodies, or the king. The breakdown of feudalism, however, and redistribution of land did not necessarily lead to small farmers in the south winding up with land of their own or land they could work and profit from. Many remained landless, and plots grew smaller and smaller and thus more and more unproductive as land was subdivided among heirs. [14] The Italian diaspora did not affect all regions of the nation equally, principally low income agricultural areas with a high proportion of small peasant land holdings. In the second phase of emigration (1900 to World War I) most emigrants were from the south and most of them were from rural areas, driven off the land by inefficient land management policies. Robert Foerster, in Italian Emigration of our Times (1919) says, " [Emigration has been]…well nigh expulsion; it has been exodus, in the sense of depopulation; it has been characteristically permanent. [15] ".

Mezzadria , a form of sharefarming where tenant families obtained a plot to work on from an owner and kept a reasonable share of the profits, was more prevalent in central Italy, which is one of the reasons why there was less emigration from that part of Italy. Although owning land was the basic yardstick of wealth, farming in the south was socially despised. People did not invest in agricultural equipment but in such things as low-risk state bonds. [14]

Fascist Italy

Benito Mussolini giving a speech at the Fiat Lingotto factory in Turin, 1932. Mussolini visiting Fiat, 1932.jpg
Benito Mussolini giving a speech at the Fiat Lingotto factory in Turin, 1932.

Italy had emerged from World War I in a poor and weakened condition. The National Fascist Party of Benito Mussolini came to power in Italy in 1922, at the end of a period of social unrest. During the first four years of the new regime, from 1922 to 1925, the Fascist had a generally laissez-faire economic policy: they initially reduced taxes, regulations and trade restrictions on the whole. [16] However, "once Mussolini acquired a firmer hold of power... laissez-faire was progressively abandoned in favour of government intervention, free trade was replaced by protectionism and economic objectives were increasingly couched in exhortations and military terminology." [17] Italy reached a balanced budget in 1924–25 and was only partially hit by the 1929 crisis. The Fascist government nationalized the holdings of large banks which had accrued significant industrial securities, [18] and a number of mixed entities were formed, whose purpose was to bring together representatives of the government and major businesses. These representatives discussed economic policy and manipulated prices and wages to satisfy both the wishes of the government and the wishes of business. This economic model based on a partnership between government and business was soon extended to the political sphere, in what came to be known as corporatism.

Throughout the 1930s, the Italian economy maintained the corporatist and autarchic model that had been established during the Great Depression. At the same time, however, Mussolini had growing ambitions of extending Italy's foreign influence through both diplomacy and military intervention. After the invasion of Ethiopia, Italy began supplying troops and equipment to the Spanish nationalists under General Francisco Franco, who were fighting in the Spanish Civil War against a leftist government. These foreign interventions required increased military spending, and the Italian economy became increasingly subordinated to the needs of its armed forces. By 1939, Italy had the highest percentage of state-owned enterprises after the Soviet Union. [19] [20] [21]

Finally, Italy's involvement in World War II as a member of the Axis powers required the establishment of a war economy. This put severe strain on the corporatist model, since the war quickly started going badly for Italy and it became difficult for the government to persuade business leaders to finance what they saw as a military disaster. The Allied invasion of Italy in 1943 caused the Italian political structure—and the economy—to rapidly collapse. The Allies, on the one hand, and the Germans on the other, took over the administration of the areas of Italy under their control. By the end of the war the Italian economy had been destroyed.[ citation needed ]

Post-World War II economic miracle

Main: Post-World War II economic growth and increased industrial production in Italy

The Italian economy has had very variable growth. In the 1950s and early 1960s, the Italian economy was booming, with record high growth rates, including 6.4% in 1959, 5.8% in 1960, 6.8% in 1961, and 6.1% in 1962. This rapid and sustained growth was due to the ambitions of several Italian businesspeople, the opening of new industries (helped by the discovery of hydrocarbons, made for iron and steel, in the Po valley), re-construction and modernisation of most Italian cities, such as Milan, Rome and Turin, and the aid given to the country after World War II (notably the Marshall Plan).

1964–1991

After 1964, Italy maintained for a while a constant growth rate of above 8% every year. [22] Later on, due to political, economical and social problems in the country during the late-1960s and most of the 1970s, [23] the economy went stagnant and in 1975, entered its first recession after that of the late-1940s. The problems included an increasingly high inflation rate, high energy prices (Italy is highly dependent on foreign oil and natural gas resources). This economic recession went on into the early-1980s until a reduction of public costs and spendings, tighter budgets and deficits, a steady economic growth, and a lowered inflation rate resulted in Italy left recession by 1983 as a result of this recovery plan. [23] This plan led to an increasing GDP growth, lower inflation, and increased industrial/agricultural/commercial produce, exports and output, yet made the unemployment rate rise. [23] A decrease in energy prices and lowered value of the dollar led to foreign exchange being liberalised and the economy to re-grow rapidly. [23] As a matter of fact, in 1987, Italy had a period when it surpassed the British economy, becoming the sixth in the world.

The 1970s and 1980s was also the period of investment and rapid economic growth in the South, unlike Northern and Central Italy which mainly grew in the 1950s and early 1960s. The "Vanoni Plan" ensured that a new programme to help growth in the South called "Cassa per il Mezzogiorno" (Funds for the "Mezzogiorno" - the latter being an unofficial term for Southern Italy, literally meaning "midday") was put in place. Investment was worth billions of US dollars: from 1951–1978, the funds spent in the South was $11.5 billion for infrastructure, [23] $13 billion for low-cost loans, [23] and outrighted grants were worth $3.2 billion. [23]

On 15 May 1991, Italy became the fourth worldwide economic power, overcoming France, [24] called the "secondo sorpasso" with a GDP of US$1.268 trillion, compared to France's GDP of US$1.209 trillion and Britain's of US$1.087 trillion. Despite the alleged 1987 GDP growth of 18% according to the Economist's [25] [26] Italy was then re-overtaken by all countries due to currency value change.

1990s

By the 1990s, the Italian government was fighting to lower the internal and external debt, liberalise the economy, reduce governmental spending, selling business and enterprises owned by the state, and trying to stop tax evasion; [23] the liberalisation of the economy meant that Italy was able to enter the EMU (European Monetary Union) and it later, in 1999, qualified to enter the eurozone. However, the main problem which plagued the 1990s, and still plagues the economy today, was tax evasion and underground "black market" business, whose value is an estimated 25% of the country's gross domestic product. [23] Despite social and political attempts to reduce the difference in wealth between the North and South, and Southern Italy's modernisation, the economic gap remained still pretty wide. [23]

In the 1990s, and still today, Italy's strength was not the big enterprises or corporation, but small to middle-sized family owned businesses and industries, which mainly operated in the North-Western "economic/industrial triangle" (Milan-Turin-Genoa). Italy's companies are comparatively smaller than those of similar countries in size or of the EU, and rather than the common trend of less, yet bigger businesses, Italy concentrated on more, yet smaller enterprises. This can be seen in the fact, that the average workers per company in the country is of 3.6 employees (8.7 for industrial/manufacturing-orientated businesses), compared to the Western European Union average of 15 workers. [23]

In the recent decades, however, Italy's economic growth has been particularly stagnant, with an average of 1.23% compared to an EU average of 2.28%. Previously, Italy's economy had accelerated from 0.7% growth in 1996 to 1.4% in 1999 and continued to rise to about 2.90% in 2000, which was closer to the EU projected growth rate of 3.10%.

In a 2017 paper, economists Bruno Pellegrino and Luigi Zingales attribute the decline in Italian labor productivity since the mid-1990s to familyism and cronyism: [27]

 We find no evidence that this slowdown is due to trade dynamics, Italy’s inefficient governmental apparatus, or excessively protective labor regulations. By contrast, the data suggest that Italy’s slowdown was more likely caused by the failure of its firms to take full advantage of the ICT revolution. While many institutional features can account for this failure, a prominent one is the lack of meritocracy in the selection and rewarding of managers. Familyism and cronyism are the ultimate causes of the Italian disease.

21st century

A graph showing Italy's GDP growth from 2000 to 2012 (including predictions of 2013) compared with EU's growth. PIL Italia 2000-2011.jpg
A graph showing Italy's GDP growth from 2000 to 2012 (including predictions of 2013) compared with EU's growth.

Italy's economy in the 21st century has been mixed, experiencing both relative economic growth and stagnation, recession and stability. In the late 2000s recession, Italy was one of a few countries whose economy did not contract dramatically, and kept a relatively stable economic growth, although figures for economic growth in 2009 and 2010 averaged in the negatives, ranging from around -1% to -5%. [28] The late-first decade of the 21st century recession has also gripped Italy; car sales in Italy have fallen by almost 20 percent over each of the past two months. Italy's car workers' union said; "The situation is evidently more serious than had been understood." [29] On 10 July 2008 economic think tank ISAE lowered its growth forecast for Italy to 0.4 percent from 0.5 percent and cut the 2009 outlook to 0.7 percent from 1.2 percent. [30] Analysts have predicted Italy had entered a recession in the second quarter or would enter one by the end of the year with business confidence at its lowest levels since the September 11 attacks. [31] Italy's economy contracted by 0.3 percent in the second quarter of 2008. [32]

In the 4 quarters of 2006, Italy's growth rates were approximately these: +0.6% in the Q1, +0.6% in the Q2, +0.65% in the Q3, and +1% in the Q4. [33]

Similarly, in 2007's 4 quarters, these were the figures: +0.25% in the Q1, +0.1% in the Q2, +0.2% in the Q3, and -0.5% in the Q4. [33]

In the 4 of 2008's quarters, the results, mainly negative, were these: +0.5% in the Q1, -0.6% in the Q2, -0.65% in the Q3 and -2.2% in the Q4. [33]

In the Q1 (1st quarter) of 2009, Italy's economy contracted by 4.9%, a greater contraction than the predictions of the Italian government, which believed that it would be of at most 4.8%. [33] The Q2 (2nd quarter) saw a smaller decrease in GDP, more or less that of -1%, and by the Q3 (3rd quarter), the economy began to re-grow slightly, with GDP increase rates of about +0.2% to +0.6%. Yet, in the Q4 (4th quarter) of the year 2009, Italy's GDP growth was of -0.2%. [33]

ISTAT predicts that Italy's falling economic growth rate is due to a general decrease in the country's industrial production and exports. [33] However, the Government of Italy believes that 2010 and beyond will bring higher growth rates: anything from circa +0.7% – +1.1%. [33]

GDP (PPP) growth

A table showing the growth of Italy's GDP (PPP) growth from 2000 to 2008

200020012002200320042005200620072008
1,191,056.71,248,648.11,295,225.71,335,353.71,390,539.01,423,048.01,475,403.01,534,561.01,814,557.0

GDP (PPP) per capita growth

A table showing Italy's GDP per capita (PPP) growth from 2000 to 2008. [34]

200020012002200320042005200620072008
20,917.021,914.922,660.723,181.323,902.624,281.225,031.625,921.426,276.40

GDP sector composition

A table showing the different compositions of the Italian economy:

Macro-economic activityGDP activity
Primary (agriculture, farming, fishing)€27,193.33
Secondary (industry, manufacturing, petrochemicals, processing)€270,000.59
Constructions€79,775.99
Tertiary (commerce, restoration, hotels and restaurants, tourism, transport, communications)€303,091.10
Financial activities and real estate€356,600.45
Other activities (e.g. R&D)€279,924.50
VAT and other forms of taxes€158,817.00
GDP (PPP) of Italy€1,475,402.97

Other statistics

[28]

Notes

Related Research Articles

Economy of Chad economy of the country

The economy of Chad suffers from the landlocked country's geographic remoteness, drought, lack of infrastructure, and political turmoil. About 85% of the population depends on agriculture, including the herding of livestock. Of Africa's Francophone countries, Chad benefited least from the 50% devaluation of their currencies in January 1994. Financial aid from the World Bank, the African Development Bank, and other sources is directed largely at the improvement of agriculture, especially livestock production. Because of lack of financing, the development of oil fields near Doba, originally due to finish in 2000, was delayed until 2003. It was finally developed and is now operated by Exxon Mobil Corporation.

Economy of Croatia economy of the country

The economy of Croatia is a developing high-income service based economy with the tertiary sector accounting for 60% of total gross domestic product (GDP). After the collapse of socialism, Croatia went through a process of transition to a market-based economy in the 1990s, but its economy suffered badly during the Croatian War of Independence. After the war the economy began to improve, before the financial crisis of 2007–08 the Croatian economy grew at 4-5% annually, incomes doubled, and economic and social opportunities dramatically improved.

Economy of Italy National economy

The economy of Italy is the 3rd-largest national economy in the European Union, the 8th-largest by nominal GDP in the world, and the 12th-largest by GDP (PPP). Italy has a major advanced economy and is a founding member of the European Union, the Eurozone, the OECD, the G7 and the G20. Italy is the eighth largest exporter in the world with $514 billion exported in 2016. Its closest trade ties are with the other countries of the European Union, with whom it conducts about 59% of its total trade. The largest trading partners, in order of market share, are Germany (12.6%), France (11.1%), the United States (6.8%), Switzerland (5.7%), the United Kingdom (4.7%) and Spain (4.4%).

Economy of the Republic of the Congo economy of the country

The economy of the Republic of the Congo is a mixture of subsistence hunting and agriculture, an industrial sector based largely on petroleum extraction and support services, and a government spending, characterized by budget problems and overstaffing. Petroleum has supplanted forestry as the mainstay of the economy, providing a major share of government revenues and exports. Nowadays the Republic of the Congo is increasingly converting natural gas to electricity rather than burning it, greatly improving energy prospects.

Economy of Senegal economy of the country

Predominantly rural, and with limited natural resources, the economy of Senegal gains most of its foreign exchange from fish, phosphates, groundnuts, tourism, and services. As one of the dominate parts of the economy, the agricultural sector of Senegal is highly vulnerable to environmental conditions, such as variations in rainfall and climate change, and changes in world commodity prices.

Economy of Seychelles Economy of the country

The economy of Seychelles is based on fishing, tourism, processing of coconuts and vanilla, coir rope, boat building, printing, furniture and beverages. Agricultural products include cinnamon, sweet potatoes, cassava (tapioca), bananas, poultry and tuna.

Economy of Switzerland National economy

The economy of Switzerland is one of the world's most advanced free market economies. The service sector has come to play a significant economic role, particularly the Swiss banking industry and tourism. The economy of Switzerland ranks first in the world in the 2015 Global Innovation Index and the 2017 Global Competitiveness Report. According to United Nations data for 2016, Switzerland is the third richest landlocked country in the world after Liechtenstein and Luxembourg, and together with the latter and Norway the only three countries in the world with a GDP per capita above US$70,000 that are neither island nations nor ministates.

Economy of Thailand National economy

The economy of Thailand is dependent on exports, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Thailand itself is a newly industrialized country, with a GDP of 16.316 trillion baht (US$505 billion) in 2018, the 8th largest economy of Asia, according to the World Bank. As of 2018, Thailand has an average inflation of 1.06% and an account surplus of 7.5% of the country's GDP. The Thai economy is expected to post 3.8% growth in 2019. Its currency, the Thai Baht, ranked as the tenth most frequently used world payment currency in 2017.

Economy of the United Kingdom National economy

The economy of the United Kingdom is a highly developed social market and market-orientated economy. It is the sixth-largest national economy in the world measured by nominal gross domestic product (GDP), ninth-largest by purchasing power parity (PPP), and twenty second-largest by GDP per capita, comprising 3.3% of world GDP.

Economy of the United States National economy

The economy of the United States is highly developed and mixed. It is the world's largest economy by nominal GDP and net wealth and the second-largest by purchasing power parity (PPP). It also has the world's eighth-highest per capita GDP (nominal) and the tenth-highest per capita GDP (PPP) in 2019. The U.S. has the most technologically powerful economy in the world and its firms are at or near the forefront in technological advances; especially in computers, pharmaceuticals, and medical, aerospace, and military equipment. The U.S. dollar is the currency most used in international transactions and is the world's foremost reserve currency, backed by its economy, its military, the petrodollar system and its linked eurodollar and large U.S. treasuries market. Several countries use it as their official currency, and in many others, it is the de facto currency. The largest U.S. trading partners are China, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Germany, South Korea, United Kingdom, France, India, and Taiwan. The U.S. is the world's largest importer and the second-largest exporter. It has free trade agreements with several nations, including NAFTA, Australia, South Korea, Israel, and few others which are in effect or currently under negotiation.

Economy of Australia National economy

The economy of Australia is a highly developed market economy. Its GDP was estimated at A$1.89 trillion as of 2019. In 2018 Australia became the country with the largest median wealth per adult, but slipped back to second highest after Switzerland in 2019. Australia's total wealth was AUD$10.9 trillion as of September 2019. In 2017, Australia was the 13th-largest national economy by nominal GDP, 20th-largest by PPP-adjusted GDP, and was the 25th-largest goods exporter and 20th-largest goods importer. Australia took the record for the longest run of uninterrupted GDP growth in the developed world with the March 2017 financial quarter, the 103rd quarter and marked 26 years since the country had a technical recession.

The world economy or global economy is the economy of all humans of the world, considered as the international exchange of goods and services that is expressed in monetary units of account. In some contexts, the two terms are distinct "international" or "global economy" being measured separately and distinguished from national economies while the "world economy" is simply an aggregate of the separate countries' measurements. Beyond the minimum standard concerning value in production, use and exchange the definitions, representations, models and valuations of the world economy vary widely. It is inseparable from the geography and ecology of Earth.

The economic policy of the George W. Bush administration was characterized by significant income tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, the implementation of Medicare Part D in 2003, increased military spending for two wars, a housing bubble that contributed to the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007–2008, and the Great Recession that followed. Economic performance during the period was adversely affected by two recessions, in 2001 and 2007–2009.

Economy of the Republic of Ireland Survey of knowledge, services and agriculture-led economy

The economy of the Republic of Ireland is primarily a knowledge economy, focused on services into high-tech, life sciences, financial services and agribusiness including agrifood. Ireland is an open economy, and ranks first for high-value foreign direct investment (FDI) flows. In the global GDP per capita tables, Ireland ranks 5th of 187 in the IMF table and 6th of 175 in the World Bank ranking.

Great Recession Early 21st-century global economic decline

The Great Recession was a period of marked general decline (recession) observed in national economies globally during the late 2000s. The scale and timing of the recession varied from country to country. At the time, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded that it was the most severe economic and financial meltdown since the Great Depression.

The European recession is part of the Great Recession, which began inside the United States. The crisis spread to Europe rapidly and affected much of the region with several countries already in recession as of February 2009, and most others suffering marked economic setbacks. The global recession was first seen in Europe, as Ireland was the first country to fall in a recession from Q2-Q3 2007 – followed by temporary growth in Q4 2007 – and then a two-year-long recession.

While beginning in the United States, the Great Recession spread to Asia rapidly and has affected much of the region.

The Great Recession in the United States was a severe financial crisis combined with a deep recession. While the recession officially lasted from December 2007 to June 2009, it took many years for the economy to recover to pre-crisis levels of employment and output. This slow recovery was due in part to households and financial institutions paying off debts accumulated in the years preceding the crisis along with restrained government spending following initial stimulus efforts. It followed the bursting of the housing bubble, the housing market correction and subprime mortgage crisis.

Political debates about the United States federal budget discusses some of the more significant U.S. budgetary debates of the 21st century. These include the causes of debt increases, the impact of tax cuts, specific events such as the United States fiscal cliff, the effectiveness of stimulus, and the impact of the Great Recession, among others. The article explains how to analyze the U.S. budget as well as the competing economic schools of thought that support the budgetary positions of the major parties.

Abenomics economic policies in Japan named after Shinzo Abe

Abenomics refers to the economic policies advocated by Shinzō Abe since the December 2012 general election, which elected Abe to his second term as Prime Minister of Japan. Abenomics is based upon "three arrows" of monetary easing, fiscal stimulus and structural reforms. The Economist characterized the program as a "mix of reflation, government spending and a growth strategy designed to jolt the economy out of suspended animation that has gripped it for more than two decades".

References

  1. 1 2 Malanima, Paolo (2020). "The Italian Economy Before Unification, 1300–1861". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.001.0001/acrefore-9780190625979-e-536 . Retrieved 2020-05-13.
  2. Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 44. ISBN   9781107507180.
  3. Coispeau, Olivier (2016-08-10). Finance Masters: A Brief History of International Financial Centers in the Last Millennium. World Scientific. ISBN   9789813108844.
  4. Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 45. ISBN   9781107507180.
  5. 1 2 Toniolo, edited by Gianni (2013). The Oxford handbook of the Italian economy since unification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199936694.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  6. Riall, Lucy (1999). The Italian risorgimento : state, society, and national unification (Repr. ed.). London [u.a.]: Routledge. p. 53. ISBN   978-0415057752.
  7. Killinger, Charles L. (2002). The history of Italy ([Online-Ausg.] ed.). Westport, Conn. [u.a.]: Greenwood Press. p.  112. ISBN   978-0313314834.
  8. Hildebrand, George Herbert (1965). Growth and Structure in the Economy of Modern Italy . Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp.  307–309.
  9. Zamagni, Vera (1993). The economic history of Italy, 1860-1990 : from the periphery to the centre (Repr. ed.). [New York]: Clarendon Press. p. 64. ISBN   978-0198287735.
  10. Kemp, Tom (1985). Industrialization in nineteenth-century Europe (2nd ed.). London: Longman. ISBN   978-0582493841.
  11. Ciccarelli, Carlo; Fenoaltea, Stefano (July 2010). "Through the Magnifying Glass: Provincial Aspects of Industrial Growth in Post-Unification Italy" (PDF). Banca d'Italia. p. 4.
  12. Cohen, Robin (1995). The Cambridge Survey of World Migration . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.  114. ISBN   0-521-44405-5 . Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  13. Clark, Martin (1984). Modern Italy, 1871-1982. New York: Longman. p. 186. ISBN   0-582-48361-1 . Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  14. 1 2 McDonald, J.S. (October 1958). "Some Socio-Economic Emigration Differentials in Rural Italy, 1902-1913". Economic Development and Cultural Change. 7 (1): 55–72. doi:10.1086/449779. ISSN   0013-0079.
  15. Cited in Abbott, Edith; Foerster, Robert F. (August 1920). "Review of: Italian Emigration of our Times by Robert Foerster (1919)". The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association. 14 (3): 523–524. doi:10.2307/1946285. ISSN   0003-0554. JSTOR   1946285.
  16. Sheldon Richman, "Fascism".
  17. Knight, Patricia (2003). Mussolini and Fascism. Routledge. p. 64.
  18. Gaetano Salvemini, "Italian Fascism". London: Victor Gollancz Ltd., 1938.
  19. Patricia Knight, Mussolini and Fascism, Routledge (UK), ISBN   0-415-27921-6, p. 65
  20. Mattesini, Fabrizio; Quintieri, Beniamino (1997). "Italy and the Great Depression: An analysis of the Italian economy, 1929–1936". Explorations in Economic History. 34 (3): 265–294. doi:10.1006/exeh.1997.0672.
  21. Mattesini, Fabrizio; Quintieri, Beniamino (2006). "Does a reduction in the length of the working week reduce unemployment? Some evidence from the Italian economy during the Great Depression". Explorations in Economic History. 43 (3): 413–437. doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2005.04.001.
  22. "Italy - Facts, Geography, & History".
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Economic development - Italy - tax, problem, average, growth, system, infrastructure, policy, sector". www.nationsencyclopedia.com.
  24. "- la Repubblica.it".
  25. "L'Italia supera Gran Bretagna in classifica Pil pro-capite".
  26. Brignolo, Massimo (27 March 2009). "Il sorpasso che non ti aspetti: l'Italia supera la Gran Bretagna". vistidalontano.blogosfere.it. Blogo.it Srl. Archived from the original on 10 October 2013. Retrieved 8 August 2016.
  27. Pellegrino, Bruno; Zingales, Luigi (October 2017). "Diagnosing the Italian Disease". NBER Working Paper No. 23964. doi: 10.3386/w23964 .
  28. 1 2 "The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency". www.cia.gov.
  29. Evans-Pritchard, Ambrose (2008-07-11). "Recession warnings ruffle Europe as Germany and Italy stall". Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 2008-07-19.
  30. "German finance ministry writes off Q2 GDP". Guardian. London. 2008-07-21. Retrieved 2008-07-22.[ dead link ]
  31. "Italy business morale hits 7-year low, recession seen". Guardian. London. 2008-07-24. Retrieved 2008-07-25.[ dead link ]
  32. "Italy's Economy Unexpectedly Shrinks; Nears Recession". Bloomberg. 2008-08-08. Retrieved 2008-08-11.
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Italian Economy Watch". italyeconomicinfo.blogspot.com.
  34. "Rapporto Svimez" (PDF). Retrieved 6 August 2009.[ permanent dead link ]

Further reading