Monster of Aramberri

Last updated

Life restoration of the "Monster of Aramberri" Monster of Aramberri.jpg
Life restoration of the "Monster of Aramberri"

The "Monster of Aramberri", also nicknamed in the scientific literature as the Aramberri pliosaur or the Aramberri specimen, is an informal name given to UANL-FCT-R2, a fossil skeleton of a very large pliosaur of which the first remains were discovered during the 1980s near the town of Aramberri, in Nuevo León, Mexico. During the decade of its discovery, the specimen was first interpreted as a dinosaur, before later inspections re-identified it as a marine reptile belonging the family Pliosauridae. Initially, only two concretions containing the animal's fossils were discovered, with one of the two (containing the fossils of a rostrum and teeth) later noted as lost in the first re-identification of the specimen in 2003. During the early 2000s, a new excavation campaign unearthed several additional fossils of the animal, in which some of them were subsequently sent to Karlsruhe State Museum of Natural History, Germany, to be prepared, before returning them in 2012 to the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, where they are mainly stored. Another significant portion of the fossils are currently stored in the Desert Museum of Saltillo.

Contents

The measurements of the fossils make the "monster of Aramberri" one of the largest pliosaurs ever discovered, but estimates of its size have dropped considerably over the years. Initial estimates set a length of around 15 m (49 ft), with maximum proposals going up to 18 m (59 ft) or even 20 m (66 ft) according to some media. The size of the fossils, its former interpretation as a juvenile and its incorrect attribution with Liopleurodon would likely have been one the cause of its size over-exaggeration in the 1999 BBC documentary series Walking with Dinosaurs . However, the most recent estimates put the size of the specimen at around 10 and 11 m (33 and 36 ft). The Aramberri specimen would have had an approximately 3 m (9.8 ft) long mandible and the large teeth since lost would have had possesed two sharp edges. The gastralia (abdominal ribs) of the Aramberri pliosaur possess traits that could be diagnostic for a distinct pliosaurid lineage that may soon be described. Based on various comparisons and descriptions, the "monster of Aramberri" is most likely a representative of the Thalassophonea, a derived clade of pliosaurids characterized by a short neck and a large, elongated skull. In the trunk, the Aramberri pliosaur preserves fossils of what appears to be an ichthyosaur, suggesting that this was its last prey consumed before its death. Two known cranial fragments of the animal also preserve bite marks that would have been made by another, more imposing pliosaur. The La Caja Formation, where the "monster of Aramberri" was discovered, contains abundant fossils of other contemporary marine reptiles dating from the Kimmeridgian stage of the Late Jurassic.

Research history

Overview of the Sierra Madre Oriental, the Mexican mountain range in which the "Monster of Aramberri" was discovered Cerros Sierra Madre Oriental.jpg
Overview of the Sierra Madre Oriental, the Mexican mountain range in which the "Monster of Aramberri" was discovered

During an excursion conducted in the fall of 1985 [lower-alpha 1] In the Mexican state of Nuevo León, the geology student Walter Hähnel discovered a large concretion of fossils in the Sierra Madre Oriental, in the town of Linares, near the municipality of Aramberri. Stratigraphically, the discovery took place within the La Caja Formation, a geological formation containing numerous fossils dating from the Upper Jurassic, and more precisely from the Upper Kimmeridgian stage. [3] [4] During the exhumation, a second, equally large concretion was discovered by paleontologists. [3] Subsequently, the two large concretions were sent to the Faculty of Earth Sciences of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, where the fossils concerned are all cataloged under the code name UANL-FCT-R2. [5] [6] The fossils were first described in the scientific literature in 1988 by Hähnel, who identified them as coming from a carnivorous dinosaur. [7] As the hemipelagic sediments surrounding the region and the anatomy of the specimen contradict this initial interpretation, [8] followed by a first re-examination led by Marie-Céline Buchy and her colleagues in 2003. [5] The first concretion contains numerous postcranial elements which include, among other things, seven pectoral vertebrae (transitional vertebrae between the cervical and thoracic regions), fragments of coracoids and a left scapula, ribs as well as gastralia (abdominal ribs). The second concretion which included a rostrum with teeth was however lost and noted as such in 2003, [9] although it was briefly described by Hähnel in 1988. [7]

Although the animal had never previously received a scientific name, the large size of the discovered fossils attracted international media attention and the specimen was quickly referred to by the informal nickname "Monster of Aramberri" as well as the from journalists and scientists alike. [10] [8] New expeditions carried out from 2001 to 2007 within the type locality by Mexican, French and German paleontologists helped by residents of the city, made it possible to exhume the caudal part of the specimen, and two thirds of the skeleton. Cranial fragments have also been discovered although most of them are unidentifiable. Field data even suggests that the fossil specimen would have been technically complete before the erosion of the skull and its exhumation for phosphorite. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] In 2003, in order to help paleontologists, the newly elected mayor of Nuevo León sent a helicopter to transport a fossil block weighing a total of 450 kg (990 lb). During his campaign the following year, the mayor approved and even completed the construction of a road leading to the excavation site. Once exhumed, most of the fossils were transferred to the Natural History Museum in Karlsruhe, Germany, for preparation. [12] The Karlsruhe Museum could not accommodate more fossils due to the size of the animal, so the remaining material was transferred to the Desert Museum in Saltillo, Coahuila. When the material kept in Karlsruhe had the preparation finalized, they were returned to the Faculty of Earth Sciences of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León in November 2012, where they have since been stored. However, some of the fossils are on display at the Mexican History Museum in Mexico City. [16] The newly discovered and prepared fossils consist of nine cervical vertebrae preserved on three blocks, additional dorsal vertebrae, ribs and gastralia, a femoral joint head as well as an almost complete pelvic girdle. The cranial elements identified include a pterygoid, a jugal and part of a maxilla preserving a dental alveolus. The new fossils are still being prepared and should receive much more detailed descriptions for future work. [17] [11] [12] [18] [19]

Description

The Aramberri specimen is one of the largest pliosaurs whose fossils discovered are at least well preserved. [20] Although the entire skeleton of the animal has not received detailed descriptions at present, authors have nevertheless described certain parts of the animal. [5] [21] [22] The various genera of pliosaurids that are regularly compared with the "Monster of Aramberri" are today classified in the Thalassophonea clade, which are characterized by an elongated skull connected to a short neck, unlike many other plesiosaurs, which have a long neck and a small head. Like all plesiosaurs, however, short tail, a massive trunk and two pairs of large flippers. [23] [24]

Size

The "Monster of Aramberri", as its nickname suggests, is also one of the largest pliosaurs identified to date, but estimates of its size have declined considerably over the years. During the 2000s, most media put the size of the Aramberri pliosaurus at between 19 and 20 m (62 and 66 ft) long with a body mass of 50 t (49 long tons; 55 short tons), [25] [26] a weight which has also been fixed by certain researchers who have described the fossils of the animal. [27] Initial, more precise estimates put the size at around 15 m long at least, [28] [29] [30] [14] although a maximum estimate of up to 18 m (59 ft) was also proposed. [31] [29] In 2008, Adam S. Smith and Gareth J. Dyke, citing the source of Buchy et al. (2003), give a maximum length of 17 m (56 ft). [32] In his thesis published a year later, in 2009, Australian paleontologist Colin McHenry criticizes this interpretation, which he finds very exaggerated. Comparing the Aramberri specimen with the fossil material attributed to Kronosaurus , he reduced its size to between 11.7 and 12.2 m (38 and 40 ft) for a body mass of between 14.9 and 17.8 t (14.7 and 17.5 long tons; 16.4 and 19.6 short tons). [33] In 2014, German paleontologists Eberhard Frey and Wolfgang Stinnesbeck increased the length of the specimen slightly to between 12 and 14 m (39 and 46 ft) [lower-alpha 2] . In 2021, Frederik Spindler and Martin Mattes further reduced the size of this specimen to between 10 and 11 m (33 and 36 ft) long. [35] In 2024, Ruizhe Jackevan Zhao does not give a precise estimate of the measurements of the specimen. He suggests instead, based on vertebral dimensions, that it would have been similar in size to Pliosaurus funkei , which according to his model was approximately 9.8 m (32 ft) long with a body mass of 12 t (12 long tons; 13 short tons). [36]

Skull

Relatively few of the animal's cranial bones have been discovered, and some of them have even been lost regarding the rostrum and teeth. [37] [14] [38] However, using the photographs and the description carried out in 1988 by Hähnel, Buchy and colleagues gave some comments in their first re-examination of the specimen in 2003. According to the descriptions, the rostrum would measure 60 cm (24 in) long and contain three broken teeth. The teeth are described as massive, reaching about 5.5 cm (2.2 in) in diameter and being bicarinate (possessing two sharp edges). According to a photo taken of this rostrum, the latter would also contain an additional tooth probably coming from an opposite jaw. Therefore, it is uncertain whether the rostrum would come from a dentary (one bone of the mandible), a maxilla or premaxilla (two bones of the upper jaw). [37] Based on a mandible of a large pliosaur preserved at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History in England, the authors estimate that the "Monster of Aramberri" should have a mandible up to 3 m (9.8 ft) long. [39] [14]

Postcranial skeleton

Currently, the majority of the postcranial material of the Aramberri pliosaur has not yet been described due to the fact that preparations are not currently finalized. However, much of the material initially discovered and some fossils exhumed and subsequently prepared have been described. [5] [21] [22] The front and back parts of the centra are slightly convex. The latter are pulley-shaped and vary in length from 9 to 10.5 cm (3.5 to 4.1 in). The neural spines of the vertebrae are quadrangular in shape in lateral view, reaching 20 cm (7.9 in) high with a length ranging from 5 to 8 cm (2.0 to 3.1 in). The neural tubes are visibly oval in shape, reaching 8 to 10 cm (3.1 to 3.9 in) high and 2 to 3 cm (0.79 to 1.18 in) wide. The preserved proximal parts of the ribs measure up to 20 cm (7.9 in), but their state of preservation prevents us from saying more about their morphology. The rare ribs associated with the vertebrae have a curved dorsal margin. [37] The femoral head of the "Monster of Aramberri monster" measures 45 cm (18 in) wide; for comparison, a specimen of Liopleurodon measuring 5 m (16 ft) long has a femoral head which only reaches 14 cm (5.5 in). [13] [21] The gastralia have deep, almost circular grooves that are irregularly spaced. As these characteristics cannot be assimilated to a bite, these may prove to be a distinctive feature that could prove diagnostic of the animal for future studies. [31]

Classification

The "Monster of Aramberri" was initially described as a large carnivorous dinosaur in 1988, [7] before paleontologists discovered that it was actually a pliosaur from the family Pliosauridae in the early 2000s. [1] [40] [5] According to Buchy et al. (2003), its affiliation is based on the presence of multiple vertebral characteristics unique to this group. These characteristics are the foramens which are present on the ventral side of each vertebrae as well as the articulations of the ribs with the latter which are quite particular. [41] The specimen was incorrectly assigned to the species Liopleurodon ferox by the media during the 2000s, [25] [26] but lack of proper cranial diagnosis and remaining undescribed fossils prevent it from being assigned to any European pliosaurid taxon. In 2014, Frey and Stinnesbeck provided a brief description of the Aramberri pliosaur and commented on its hypothetical affinities within the pliosaurid family. The small size of the flippers relative to the body of the animal indicates that the specimen would be a close relative of the Australian pliosaurid Kronosaurus . [19] The group that currently includes Kronosaurus, known as Brachaucheninae, only includes representatives that lived during the Cretaceous, [42] the Aramberri specimen being dated to the Upper Jurassic. In 2009, based on its vertebral morphology, McHenry did not consider the Aramberri specimen to be close to Kronosaurus, casting doubt on the classification later proposed by Frey and Stinnesbeck. [43] Nevertheless, both authors note that the notable anatomy of the gastralia could be diagnostic for the specimen and therefore establish it within a distinct taxon for future studies. [19]

Paleobiology

Ontogenety

In their 2003 study, Buchy and his colleagues noted that the seventh neural arch is not fused with the vertebrae, the other neural arches being incomplete to allow similar observations. Plesiosaur specimens with neural arches not fused to the vertebrae are generally seen as juveniles, and the authors therefore consider the Aramberri specimen to be one as well. [28] However, Buchy questioned this interpretation in 2007, citing that very few pliosaur fossils have been found with neural arches fused to the vertebrae, and that these were most likely juvenile traits carried over into adulthood. [44] McHenry shares identical conclusions in his 2009 thesis. [45] Based on these observations, Frey and Stinnesbeck then interpreted the specimen as being a subadult. [34] In 2024, Jackevan Zhao, sharing the same observations, considers the specimen as an adult due to its rather imposing size. [46]

Bite marks

Certain cranial fragments of the Aramberri pliosaur, namely the jugal and the pterygoid, show bite marks showing that the specimen would have been attacked at the back of the head. The bite mark present on the pterygoid shows that it would have been made by a tooth whose crown is estimated according to sources at between 4 and 7 cm (1.6 and 2.8 in), suggesting a total length of the tooth of approximately 30 cm (12 in). Despite the significant injury, the pterygoid shows the presence of a callus, suggesting that the animal may have survived the incident. Conversely, the jugal would have been perforated by a tooth which would have reached two-thirds of that which had touched the pterygoid, but which would have probably been fatal. The animal that would have injured or even killed the Aramberri pliosaur would probably have been larger, but the authors did not give estimates of its size in order to avoid speculations. [12] [14] [47]

Stomac contents

At the trunk level, the Aramberri specimen shows what appear to be poorly preserved bones with etching traces from a possible ichthyosaur. The ichthyosaur in question would likely have been the specimen's last meal before its death, but further studies are needed to confirm this. [31]

Life-sized restoration of the "monster of Aramberri" in the Papalote Museo del Nino, in Mexico City Monstruo de Aramberri en Papalote 1.jpg
Life-sized restoration of the "monster of Aramberri" in the Papalote Museo del Niño, in Mexico City

As mentioned previously, the Aramberri specimen was for a time attributed to Liopleurodon. [25] [26] As the specimen was formerly interpreted as a juvenile (therefore suggesting that the supposed adult specimens would have been larger), it is likely that this specimen would have been one of the possible causes of the over-exaggeration of the measurements of Liopleurodon in the 1999 BBC documentary series Walking with Dinosaurs , where it is depicted as reaching 25 m (82 ft) in length and weighing 150 t (150 long tons; 170 short tons). [17] [11] [48] However, the largest specimens of Liopleurodon would have visibly reached 8 m (26 ft) in length with a body mass of 7.8 t (7.7 long tons; 8.6 short tons), [49] and it is very unlikely that the Aramberri specimen is a representative of this genus. [17] [11] [19] In 2009, McHenry humorously referred this tendency to over-exaggerate the size of Liopleurodon and the Aramberri specimen as "godzillaisation". [17] [50]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ For an unclear reason, some sources place the year of discovery of the fossil specimen as 1984. [1] [2]
  2. ↑ Earlier in the work, the same paleontologists set the size of this specimen at 15 m (49 ft) long like the majority of previous estimates. [34]

Related Research Articles

<i>Kronosaurus</i> Pliosaur genus from the Early Cretaceous period of Australia

Kronosaurus is an extinct genus of large short-necked pliosaur that lived during the Aptian to Albian stages of the Early Cretaceous in what is now Australia. The first known specimen was received in 1899 and consists of a partially preserved mandibular symphysis, which was first thought to come from an ichthyosaur according to Charles De Vis. However, it was 1924 that Albert Heber Longman formally described this specimen as the holotype of an imposing pliosaurid, to which he gave the scientific name K. queenslandicus, which is still the only recognized species nowadays. The genus name, meaning "lizard of Kronos", refers to its large size and possible ferocity reminiscent of the Titan of the Greek mythology, while the species name alludes to Queensland, the Australian state of its discovery. In the early 1930s, the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology sent an organized expedition to Australia that recovered two specimens historically attributed to the taxon, including a well known skeleton that is now massively restored in plaster. Several attributed fossils were subsequently discovered, including two large, more or less preserved skeletons. As the holotype specimen does not present diagnostics to concretely distinguish Kronosaurus from other pliosaurids, these same two skeletons are proposed as potential neotypes for future redescriptions. Two additional species were proposed, but these are now seen as unlikely or belonging to another genus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pliosauroidea</span> Extinct clade of reptiles

Pliosauroidea is an extinct clade of plesiosaurs, known from the earliest Jurassic to early Late Cretaceous. They are best known for the subclade Thalassophonea, which contained crocodile-like short-necked forms with large heads and massive toothed jaws, commonly known as pliosaurs. More primitive non-thalassophonean pliosauroids resembled plesiosaurs in possessing relatively long necks and smaller heads. They originally included only members of the family Pliosauridae, of the order Plesiosauria, but several other genera and families are now also included, the number and details of which vary according to the classification used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plesiosaur</span> Order of reptiles (fossil)

The Plesiosauria or plesiosaurs are an order or clade of extinct Mesozoic marine reptiles, belonging to the Sauropterygia.

Liopleurodon is an extinct genus of carnivorous pliosaurs that lived from the Callovian stage of the Middle Jurassic to the Kimmeridgian stage of the Late Jurassic period. The taxonomic history of the animal is quite complex. The type species L. ferox, which is probably the only valid species, was erected in 1873 by Henri Émile Sauvage from a single tooth discovered near the French commune of Boulogne-sur-Mer, in Pas-de-Calais. Rather, in 1869 Harry Govier Seeley erected a species of Pliosaurus, Pliosaurus pachydeirus, based on a series of cervical vertebrae that had been discovered near the civil parish of Great Gransden, Cambridgeshire, England. In 1960, Lambert Beverly Tarlo moved this species within the genus Liopleurodon. However, its validity as a distinct species has been questioned since the beginning of the 21st century, in particular because its supposed distinctive characteristics would be in fact individual variations, suggesting that it is a probable junior synonym of L .ferox. However, identification of a neotype specimen of L. ferox is necessary to confirm whether this observation is true. Numerous fossil specimens attributed to Liopleurodon, even including numerous skeletons, have been discovered in Europe, Russia and Mexico. Other additional species were even proposed, but these are currently seen as coming from other pliosaurid genera.

Peloneustes is a genus of pliosaurid plesiosaur from the Middle Jurassic of England. Its remains are known from the Peterborough Member of the Oxford Clay Formation, which is Callovian in age. It was originally described as a species of Plesiosaurus by palaeontologist Harry Govier Seeley in 1869, before being given its own genus by naturalist Richard Lydekker in 1889. While many species have been assigned to Peloneustes, P. philarchus is currently the only one still considered valid, with the others moved to different genera, considered nomina dubia, or synonymised with P. philarchus. Some of the material formerly assigned to P. evansi have since been reassigned to "Pliosaurus" andrewsi. Peloneustes is known from many specimens, including some very complete material.

<i>Pliosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Pliosaurus is an extinct genus of thalassophonean pliosaurid known from the Late Jurassic of Europe and South America. Most European species of Pliosaurus measured around 8 metres (26 ft) long and weighed about 5 metric tons, but P. rossicus and P. funkei would have been one of the largest plesiosaurs of all time, exceeding 10 metres (33 ft) in length. This genus has contained many species in the past but recent reviews found only six to be valid, while the validity of two additional species awaits a petition to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Currently, P. brachyspondylus and P. macromerus are considered dubious, while P. portentificus is considered undiagnostic. Species of this genus are differentiated from other pliosaurids based on seven autapomorphies, including teeth that are triangular in cross section. Their diet would have included fish, cephalopods, and marine reptiles.

<i>Brachauchenius</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Brachauchenius is an extinct genus of pliosaurid that lived in North America and Morocco during the Late Cretaceous.

<i>Megalneusaurus</i> Extinct genus of marines reptiles

Megalneusaurus is an extinct genus of large pliosaurs that lived during the Oxfordian and Kimmeridgian stages of the Late Jurassic in what is now North America. It was provisionally described as a species of Cimoliosaurus by the geologist Wilbur Clinton Knight in 1895, before being given its own genus by the same author in 1898. The only species identified to date is M. rex, known from several specimens identified in the Redwater Shale Member, within the Sundance Formation, Wyoming, United States. A specimen discovered in the Naknek Formation in southern Alaska was referred to the genus in 1994. In Ancient Greek, the generic name literally translates to "large swimming lizard", due to the measurement of the fossils of the holotype specimen.

<i>Simolestes</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Simolestes is an extinct pliosaurid genus that lived in the Middle to Late Jurassic. The type specimen, NHMUK PV R 3319 is an almost complete but crushed skeleton diagnostic to Simolestes vorax, dating back to the Callovian of the Oxford Clay formation, England. The genus might also be known from the Tithonian Bhuj Formation of India (S.indicus), however the referral of this species to Simolestes is dubious. S.keileni from France was moved to the new genus Lorrainosaurus in 2023.

<i>Polyptychodon</i> Genus of pliosaurid plesiosaur from the Cretaceous period

Polyptychodon is a genus of pliosaurid found in Middle-Late Cretaceous marine deposits in southern England, France and Argentina. It has been considered a nomen dubium in a 2016 review.

<i>Tatenectes</i> Genus of extinct plesiosaur from the upper Jurassic

Tatenectes is a genus of cryptoclidid plesiosaur known from the Upper Jurassic of Wyoming. Its remains were recovered from the Redwater Shale Member of the Sundance Formation, and initially described as a new species of Cimoliosaurus by Wilbur Clinton Knight in 1900. It was reassigned to Tricleidus by Maurice G. Mehl in 1912 before being given its own genus by O'Keefe and Wahl in 2003. Tatenectes laramiensis is the type and only species of Tatenectes. While the original specimen was lost, subsequent discoveries have revealed that Tatenectes was a very unusual plesiosaur. Its torso had a flattened, boxy cross-section and its gastralia exhibit pachyostosis (thickening). The total length of Tatenectes has been estimated at 2–3 meters (6.6–9.8 ft).

<i>Pachycostasaurus</i> Extinct species of reptile

Pachycostasaurus is an extinct Pliosauroid from the Oxford Clay formation of Peterborough, England.

<i>Gallardosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Gallardosaurus is a genus of pliosaurid plesiosaur from the Caribbean seaway. It contains the single species Gallardosaurus iturraldei. Gallardosaurus was found in middle-late Oxfordian-age rocks of the Jagua Formation of western Cuba. Gallardosaurus is believed to be evolutionarily connected to Peloneustes, a pliosaurid commonly found in the Oxfordian-aged sediment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of plesiosaur research</span>

This timeline of plesiosaur research is a chronologically ordered list of important fossil discoveries, controversies of interpretation, taxonomic revisions, and cultural portrayals of plesiosaurs, an order of marine reptiles that flourished during the Mesozoic Era. The first scientifically documented plesiosaur fossils were discovered during the early 19th century by Mary Anning. Plesiosaurs were actually discovered and described before dinosaurs. They were also among the first animals to be featured in artistic reconstructions of the ancient world, and therefore among the earliest prehistoric creatures to attract the attention of the lay public. Plesiosaurs were originally thought to be a kind of primitive transitional form between marine life and terrestrial reptiles. However, now plesiosaurs are recognized as highly derived marine reptiles descended from terrestrial ancestors.

<i>Megacephalosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Megacephalosaurus is an extinct genus of short-necked pliosaur that inhabited the Western Interior Seaway of North America about 94 to 93 million years ago during the Turonian stage of the Late Cretaceous, containing the single species M. eulerti. It is named after its large head, which is the largest of any plesiosaur in the continent and measures up to 1.75 meters (5.7 ft) in length. Megacephalosaurus was one of the largest marine reptiles of its time with an estimated length of 6–9 meters (20–30 ft). Its long snout and consistently sized teeth suggest that it preferred a diet of smaller-sized prey.

The La Caja Formation is a geologic formation in Mexico. It preserves fossils dating from the Kimmeridgian to the lower Berriasian. La Caja Formation is widespread in northeastern and central Mexico and known for their abundant and diverse well-preserved ammonites. It was deposited in hemipelagic conditions, and predominantly consists of siliclastic sediments, including marl, with limestone. It is laterally equivalent to the La Casita Formation, which represent more proximal facies. The ichthyosaurs Ophthalmosaurus icenicus and Parrassaurus yacahuitztli, metriorhynchid Cricosaurus saltillensis and the giant pliosaur "Monster of Aramberri" are known from the formation.

<i>Mauriciosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Mauriciosaurus is a genus of polycotylid plesiosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Mexico. It contains a single species, M. fernandezi, described in 2017 by Eberhard Frey and colleagues from a single well-preserved juvenile specimen about 1.9 metres long. Morphologically, it is overall most similar to the polycotyline polycotylids Trinacromerum and Dolichorhynchops. However, several features separate Mauriciosaurus from all other polycotylids, warranting the naming of a new genus. These include the sophisticated pattern of ridges on the bottom of the parasphenoid bone on its palate; the narrow openings in the palate bordered by the pterygoid bones; the lack of perforations in the surface of the coracoid; and the highly unusual arrangement of gastralia, or belly ribs, which is only otherwise seen in the non-polycotylid Cryptoclidus.

Luskhan is an extinct genus of brachauchenine pliosaur from the Cretaceous of Russia. The type and only species is Luskhan itilensis, named by Valentin Fischer and colleagues in 2017 from a well-preserved and nearly complete skeleton. As an early-diverging brachauchenine, Luskhan consequently exhibits an intermediate combination of traits seen in more basal and more derived pliosaurs. However, Luskhan departs significantly from other pliosaurs in that it exhibits a lack of adaptations in its skull to feeding on large prey; its slender snout, small teeth, and short tooth rows instead indicate a skull adapted for feeding on small, soft prey. With these features, it is the pliosaur that approaches closest to the distantly-related piscivorous polycotylids, having convergently evolved these traits more than 10 million years apart.

<i>Monquirasaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Monquirasaurus is an extinct genus of giant short-necked pliosaurs who lived during the Early Cretaceous (Aptian) in what is now Colombia. One species is known, M. boyacensis, described in 2021 from an almost complete fossil skeleton, discovered in 1977 in the town of Villa de Leyva, located in Boyacá. Published descriptions of the holotype specimen estimate that it should reach a total size approaching 8 m (26 ft) in length, making Monquirasaurus a large representative of the pliosaurids.

Eardasaurus is a genus of thalassophonean pliosaurid from the middle Jurassic Oxford Clay Formation. The animal would have measured over 4.7 m (15 ft) long and possessed a high amount of teeth relative to other pliosaurs. Its teeth show distinct ridges formed by the tooth enamel, some of which are very pronounced and similar to carinae, giving the teeth a cutting edge.

References

  1. 1 2 Frey, Buchy & Stinnesbeck 2001, p. 30.
  2. ↑ Ellis 2003, p. 181.
  3. 1 2 Buchy et al. 2003, p. 271-272.
  4. ↑ Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 9, 84-85.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Buchy et al. 2003, p. 271-278.
  6. ↑ Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 85-86.
  7. 1 2 3 Hähnel 1988, p. 245-250.
  8. 1 2 Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 85.
  9. ↑ Buchy et al. 2003, p. 271, 275.
  10. ↑ Frey, Stinnesbeck & Buchy 2006, p. 4.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Forrest 2006b.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Frey, Stinnesbeck & Buchy 2006, p. 7.
  13. 1 2 Buchy et al. 2006, p. 9.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Buchy 2007, p. 28.
  15. ↑ Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 86.
  16. ↑ El Mañana 2022.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Forrest 2006a.
  18. ↑ Buchy et al. 2006, p. 8-9.
  19. 1 2 3 4 Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 87-88.
  20. ↑ Buchy 2007, p. 30.
  21. 1 2 3 Buchy 2007, p. 28-31.
  22. 1 2 Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 84-88.
  23. ↑ McHenry 2009, p. 3.
  24. ↑ Jackevan Zhao 2024, p. 3.
  25. 1 2 3 BBC 2002.
  26. 1 2 3 Ellis 2003, p. 182.
  27. ↑ Frey, Stinnesbeck & Buchy 2006, p. 6.
  28. 1 2 Buchy et al. 2003, p. 271, 276.
  29. 1 2 Frey, Stinnesbeck & Buchy 2006, p. 4 6-7.
  30. ↑ Buchy et al. 2006, p. 9, 13.
  31. 1 2 3 Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 87.
  32. ↑ Smith & Dyke 2008, p. 975.
  33. ↑ McHenry 2009, p. 471, 433.
  34. 1 2 Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 17.
  35. ↑ Spindler & Mattes 2021, p. 56.
  36. ↑ Jackevan Zhao 2024, p. 36-37.
  37. 1 2 3 Buchy et al. 2003, p. 275.
  38. ↑ Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 86-87.
  39. ↑ Buchy et al. 2006, p. 14.
  40. ↑ Ellis 2003, p. 181-182.
  41. ↑ Buchy et al. 2003, p. 275-276.
  42. ↑ Jackevan Zhao 2024, p. 35, 39-40.
  43. ↑ McHenry 2009, p. 433.
  44. ↑ Buchy 2007, p. 30-31.
  45. ↑ McHenry 2009, p. 434, 445.
  46. ↑ Jackevan Zhao 2024, p. 21.
  47. ↑ Rivera-Sylva, Carpenter & Frey 2014, p. 87–88.
  48. ↑ McHenry 2009, p. 360.
  49. ↑ Jackevan Zhao 2024, p. 39.
  50. ↑ McHenry 2009, p. 33, 445.

Bibliography

Web sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.