Henricosbornia

Last updated

Henricosbornia
Temporal range: Late Paleocene-Middle Eocene (Peligran
~58–45  Ma
Henricosbornia.png
Henricosbornia
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Notoungulata
Family: Henricosborniidae
Genus: Henricosbornia
Ameghino 1901
Type species
Henricosbornia lophodonta
Ameghino, 1901
Species
  • H. amplaSimpson 1948
  • H. lophodontaAmeghino 1901
  • H. minutaRoth 1904
Synonyms
Genus synonymy
  • HemistylopsAmeghino 1904
  • MicrostylopsAmeghino 1901
  • MonolophodonRoth 1903
  • PantostylopsAmeghino 1901
  • PolystylopsAmeghino 1904
  • ProhyracotheriumAmeghino 1902
  • SelenoconusAmeghino 1901
Species synonymy
  • Hemistylops paucicuspidatusAmeghino 1904
  • Hemistylops trigonostyloidesAmeghino 1904
  • Henricosbornia alouatinaAmeghino 1904
  • Henricosbornia subconicaAmeghino 1904
  • Henricosbornia waitehorSimpson 1935
  • Microstylops clarusAmeghino 1901
  • Microstylops monoconusAmeghino 1904
  • Pantostylops completusAmeghino 1902
  • Pantostylops incompletusAmeghino 1901
  • Peripantostylops orehorSimpson 1935
  • Polystylops progediensAmeghino 1904
  • Prohyracotherium matunitumAmeghino 1902
  • Prohyracotherium patagonicumAmeghino 1902
  • Selenoconus centralisAmeghino 1901
  • Selenoconus senexAmeghino 1901
  • Selenoconus spiculatusAmeghino 1902

Henricosbornia is an extinct genus of henricosborniid notoungulate that lived from the Late Paleocene to the Middle Eocene of what is now Argentina and Brazil.

Contents

Description

This animal is mostly known from its fossilized teeth, and any reconstruction of it is therefore only hypothetical. The dentition of Henricosbornia was primitive in that it had no diastema, and the molars and premolars were low-crowned (brachydont). All the upper molars were triangular in section, and devoid of hypoconus. The crest of the trigonid was oblique, and the metaconid was higher than the protoconid. The entoconid was posterior, and took the form of a transversal crest. The species Henricosbornia lophodonta exhibits a large intraspecific variability in the metaloph morphology.

Classification

The genus Henricosbornia was first described in 1901 by Florentino Ameghino, based on fossil remains found in terrains dating from the Early Eocene of Argentina, in the Chubut Province. In a few years, Ameghino described numerous remains of teeth from the same area and considered them as belonging to various species of notoungulates, which he named Hericosbornia lophodonta (the type species), Hemistylops paucicuspidatus, Hemistylops trigonostyloides, Pantostylops completus, Microstylops monoconus, Prohyracotherium patagonicum, Microstylops clarus, Selenoconus spiculatus, Prohyracotherium matutinum. The generic name is derived from the famous paleontologist Henry Fairfield Osborn. All these species were later identified as Henricosbornia lophodonta by George Gaylord Simpson, who identified the numerous dental remains as intraspecific variations. [1]

Several other species were attributed to the genus, some of them still considered valid; Henricosbornia ampla, the youngest species, was found in deposits dating to the Middle Eocene as well as H. minuta. One of the species described by Ameghino in 1901, Pantostylops typus, may have been a distinct species of Henricosbornia. Fossils attributed to the genus were also discovered in slightly more ancient, Late Paleocene terrains of Argentina. [2]

Given its archaic characteristics, Henricosbornia is considered to be one of the most basal notoungulates. It is the eponymous genus of Henricosborniidae, a family including the most basal notoungulates, and classically associated with the Notostylopidae within the probably paraphyletic suborder Notioprogonia. It is related to Nanolophodon .

References

  1. G. G. Simpson. 1948. The beginning of the age of mammals in South America. Part I. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 91:1-232
    • E. V. Oliveira and F. J. Goin. 2011. A reassessment of bunodont metatherians from the Paleogene of Itaboraí (Brazil): Systematics and the age of the Itaborian SALMA. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 14(2):105-136