These are lists of regions and countries by their estimated real gross domestic product (GDP) in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), the value of all final goods and services produced within a country/region in a given year. GDP dollar (international dollar) estimates here are derived from PPP estimates.
In the absence of sufficient data for nearly all economies until well into the 19th century, past GDP cannot be calculated, but at best only roughly estimated. In a first step, economic historians try to reconstruct the GDP per capita for a given political or geographical entity from the meagre evidence. This value is then multiplied by estimated population size, another determinant for which as a rule only little ancient data is available.
A key notion in the whole process is that of subsistence, the income level which is necessary for sustaining one's life. Since pre-modern societies, by modern standards, were characterized by a very low degree of urbanization and a large majority of people working in the agricultural sector, economic historians prefer to express income in cereal units. To achieve comparability over space and time, these numbers are then converted into monetary units such as International Dollars, a third step which leaves a relatively wide margin of interpretation.
The formula thus is: GDP (PPP) = GDP per capita (PPP) x population size
It should be stressed that, historically speaking, population size is the far more important multiplier in the equation. This is because, in contrast to industrial economies, the average income ceiling of premodern agrarian societies was quite low everywhere, possibly not higher than twice the subsistence level. [1] Therefore, the total GDP as given below primarily reflects the respective historical population size, and is much less indicative of contemporary living standards than, for example, estimations of past GDP per capita are.
According to the 20th-century macroeconomist Paul Bairoch, a pioneer in historical economic analysis,
it is obvious that by itself the volume of total GNP has no important significance, and that the volume of GNP is not by itself the expression of the economic strength of a nation.
Rather, Bairoch advocates a formula combining GNP per capita and total GNP to give a better measure of the economic performance of national economies. [2]
In his 1995 book Economics and World History, economic historian Paul Bairoch gave the following estimates in terms of 1960 US dollars, for GNP from 1750 to 1990, comparing what are today the Third World (Asia, Africa, Latin America) and the First World (Western Europe, Northern America, Japan) [3]
Year | 1960 dollars | 1990 dollars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Third World [A] | First World [B] | Third World [A] | First World [B] | |
1750 | 112 | 35 | 495 | 155 |
1800 | 137 | 47 | 605 | 208 |
1830 | 150 | 67 | 662 | 296 |
1860 | 159 | 118 | 702 | 521 |
1900 | 184 | 297 | 813 | 1,312 |
1913 | 217 | 430 | 958 | 1,899 |
1928 | 252 | 568 | 1,113 | 2,508 |
1938 | 293 | 678 | 1,294 | 2,994 |
1950 | 338 | 889 | 1,493 | 3,926 |
1970 | 810 | 2,450 | 3,577 | 10,820 |
1980 | 1,280 | 3,400 | 5,653 | 15,015 |
1990 | 1,730 | 4,350 | 7,640 | 19,210 |
A ^ Third World refers to Asia (excluding Japan), Africa, and Latin America.
B ^ First World refers to Europe, Russia, the United States, Canada, and Japan.
The following estimates are taken exclusively from the 2007 monograph Contours of the World Economy, 1–2030 AD by the British economist Angus Maddison. [4]
When graphed, one can see that India was the world's largest economy from year 1 to year 1500, when it lost the position to China, who subsequently lost the position around 1890. China is reasserting its position as the world's largest economy, which it had lost. [5] There was little difference in GDP per capita based on level of development in earlier eras, so in 1500, China was the largest economy in the world, followed closely by India. [5]
Country / Region | 1 | 1000 | 1500 | 1600 | 1700 | 1820 | 1870 | 1913 | 1950 | 1973 | 1989 | 2008 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Austria | 213 | 298 | 1,414 | 2,093 | 2,483 | 4,104 | 8,419 | 23,451 | 25,702 | 85,227 | 124,791 | 198,004 |
Belgium | 135 | 170 | 1,225 | 1,561 | 2,288 | 4,529 | 13,716 | 32,347 | 47,190 | 118,516 | 166,396 | 246,103 |
Denmark | 72 | 144 | 443 | 569 | 727 | 1,471 | 3,782 | 11,670 | 29,654 | 70,032 | 93,728 | 135,037 |
Finland | 8 | 16 | 136 | 215 | 255 | 913 | 1,999 | 6,389 | 17,051 | 51,724 | 84,092 | 127,676 |
France | 2,366 | 2,763 | 10,912 | 15,559 | 19,539 | 35,468 | 72,100 | 144,489 | 220,492 | 683,965 | 1,000,286 | 1,423,562 |
Germany | 1,225 | 1,435 | 8,256 | 12,656 | 13,650 | 26,819 | 72,149 | 237,332 | 265,354 | 944,755 | 1,302,212 | 1,713,405 |
Italy | 6,475 | 2,250 | 11,550 | 14,410 | 14,630 | 22,535 | 41,814 | 95,487 | 164,957 | 582,713 | 906,053 | 1,157,636 |
Netherlands | 85 | 128 | 723 | 2,072 | 4,047 | 4,288 | 9,952 | 24,955 | 60,642 | 175,791 | 247,906 | 411,055 |
Norway | 40 | 80 | 183 | 266 | 361 | 777 | 2,360 | 5,988 | 17,728 | 44,852 | 76,733 | 132,365 |
Sweden | 80 | 160 | 382 | 626 | 1,231 | 3,098 | 6,927 | 17,403 | 47,269 | 109,794 | 149,415 | 193,352 |
Switzerland | 128 | 123 | 411 | 750 | 1,068 | 2,165 | 5,581 | 16,483 | 42,545 | 117,251 | 141,599 | 190,328 |
UK | 320 | 800 | 2,815 | 6,007 | 10,709 | 36,232 | 100,180 | 224,618 | 347,850 | 675,941 | 940,908 | 1,446,959 |
12 country total | 11,146 | 8,366 | 38,450 | 56,784 | 70,988 | 142,399 | 338,979 | 840,612 | 1,286,434 | 3,660,561 | 5,235,115 | 7,402,911 |
Portugal | 180 | 255 | 606 | 814 | 1,638 | 3,043 | 4,219 | 7,467 | 17,615 | 63,397 | 102,922 | 154,132 |
Spain | 1,867 | 1,800 | 4,495 | 7,029 | 7,481 | 12,299 | 19,556 | 41,653 | 61,429 | 266,896 | 454,166 | 797,927 |
Other | 1,240 | 504 | 632 | 975 | 1,106 | 2,110 | 4,712 | 12,478 | 30,600 | 105,910 | 169,648 | 343,059 |
Total Western Europe | 14,433 | 10,925 | 44,183 | 65,602 | 81,213 | 159,851 | 367,466 | 902,210 | 1,396,078 | 4,096,764 | 5,961,851 | 8,698,029 |
Eastern Europe | 1,956 | 2,600 | 6,696 | 9,289 | 11,393 | 24,906 | 50,163 | 134,793 | 185,023 | 550,756 | 718,039 | 1,030,628 |
Former USSR | 1,560 | 2,840 | 8,458 | 11,426 | 16,196 | 37,678 | 83,646 | 232,351 | 510,243 | 1,513,070 | 2,037,253 | 2,242,206 |
United States | 272 | 520 | 800 | 600 | 527 | 12,548 | 98,374 | 517,383 | 1,455,916 | 3,536,622 | 5,703,521 | 9,485,136 |
Other Western offshoots | 176 | 228 | 320 | 320 | 306 | 951 | 13,119 | 65,558 | 179,574 | 521,667 | 856,847 | 1,448,542 |
Total Western offshoots | 448 | 748 | 1,120 | 920 | 833 | 13,499 | 111,493 | 582,941 | 1,635,490 | 4,058,289 | 6,560,368 | 10,933,678 |
Mexico | 880 | 1,800 | 3,188 | 1,134 | 2,558 | 5,000 | 6,214 | 25,921 | 67,368 | 279,302 | 491,767 | 877,312 |
Other Latin America | 1,360 | 2,760 | 4,100 | 2,629 | 3,788 | 9,921 | 21,097 | 94,875 | 347,960 | 1,110,158 | 1,735,919 | 3,168,621 |
Total Latin America | 2,240 | 4,560 | 7,288 | 3,763 | 6,346 | 14,921 | 27,311 | 120,796 | 415,328 | 1,389,460 | 2,227,686 | 4,045,933 |
Japan | 1,200 | 3,188 | 7,700 | 9,620 | 15,390 | 20,739 | 25,393 | 71,653 | 160,966 | 1,242,932 | 2,208,858 | 2,904,141 |
China | 26,820 | 26,550 | 61,800 | 96,000 | 82,800 | 228,600 | 189,740 | 241,431 | 244,985 | 739,414 | 2,051,813 | 8,908,894 |
India [A] | 33,750 | 33,750 | 60,500 | 74,250 | 90,750 | 111,417 | 134,882 | 204,242 | 222,222 | 494,832 | 1,043,912 | 3,415,183 |
Other east Asia | 4,845 | 8,968 | 20,822 | 24,582 | 28,440 | 36,451 | 53,155 | 122,874 | 256,938 | 829,023 | 2,021,528 | 5,154,979 |
West Asia | 10,120 | 12,415 | 10,495 | 12,637 | 12,291 | 15,270 | 22,468 | 40,588 | 106,283 | 548,120 | 855,130 | 1,905,346 |
Total Asia (excl. Japan) | 75,535 | 81,683 | 153,617 | 207,469 | 214,281 | 391,738 | 400,245 | 609,135 | 830,428 | 2,621,624 | 5,972,383 | 19,384,402 |
Africa | 8,030 | 13,835 | 19,383 | 23,473 | 25,776 | 31,266 | 45,234 | 79,486 | 203,131 | 549,993 | 889,922 | 1,734,918 |
World | 105,402 | 120,379 | 248,445 | 331,562 | 371,428 | 694,598 | 1,110,951 | 2,733,365 | 5,331,689 | 16,022,888 | 26,576,359 | 50,973,935 |
Country / Region | 1 | 1000 | 1500 | 1600 | 1700 | 1820 | 1870 | 1913 | 1950 | 1973 | 1989 | 2008 |
A ^ From 1 AD to 1913 AD, India includes modern Pakistan and Bangladesh. From 1950 onwards, India refers only to the modern Republic of India.
Maddison' assumptions have been both admired and criticized by academics and journalists. By Bryan Haig, who has characterized Maddison's figures for 19th century Australia as "inaccurate and irrelevant", [6] by W. W. Rostow, according to whom "this excessive macroeconomic bias also causes him (Maddison) to mis-date, in my view, the beginning of what he calls the capitalist era at 1820 rather than, say, the mid-1780s." [7]
W. J. MacPherson has described Maddison's work on early medieval India of using "dubious comparative data." [8] Maddison's estimates have also been critically reviewed and revised by the Italian economists Giovanni Federico [9] and Elio Lo Cascio/Paolo Malanima (see below). [10]
However, economist and journalist Evan Davis has praised Maddison's research by citing it as a "fantastic publication" and that it was "based on the detailed scholarship of the world expert on historical economic data Angus Maddison." He also added that "One shouldn't read the book in the belief the statistics are accurate to 12 decimal places." [11]
The following estimates were made by the economic historian Paul Bairoch. [12] Contrary to most other estimates on this page, the GNP (at market prices) is given here in 1960 US dollars. Unlike Maddison, Bairoch allows for the fluctuation of borders, basing his estimates mostly on the historical boundaries at the given points in time. [13]
Country / Region | 1830 | 1840 | 1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890 | 1900 | 1910 | 1913 | 1925 | 1938 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Austria | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4,314 | 4,320 |
Austria-Hungary | 7,210 | 8,315 | 9,190 | 9,996 | 11,380 | 12,297 | 15,380 | 19,400 | 23,970 | 26,050 | – | – |
Baltic countries | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2,298 | 2,760 |
Belgium | 1,098 | 1,397 | 1,809 | 2,302 | 2,882 | 3,256 | 3,804 | 4,800 | 6,308 | 6,794 | 7,658 | 8,501 |
Bulgaria | – | – | – | 588 | 616 | 611 | 808 | 970 | 1,165 | 1,260 | 1,613 | 2,628 |
Czechoslovakia | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,822 | 8,050 |
Denmark | 256 | 292 | 361 | 476 | 612 | 788 | 1,095 | 1,544 | 2,031 | 2,421 | 2,893 | 2,893 |
Finland | 256 | 295 | 370 | 420 | 550 | 670 | 860 | 1,110 | 1,395 | 1,670 | 1,910 | 3,339 |
France | 8,582 | 10,335 | 11,870 | 13,326 | 16,800 | 17,381 | 19,758 | 23,500 | 26,869 | 27,401 | 36,262 | 39,284 |
Germany | 7,235 | 8,320 | 10,395 | 12,771 | 16,697 | 19,993 | 26,454 | 35,800 | 45,523 | 49,760 | 45,002 | 77,178 |
Greece | – | 200 | 220 | 250 | 365 | 440 | 640 | 780 | 910 | 1,540 | 2,340 | 4,200 |
Hungary | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3,025 | 4,137 |
Ireland | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,862 | 1,907 |
Italy | 7,570 | 8,951 | 8,666 | 10,466 | 11,273 | 11,745 | 12,435 | 14,820 | 15,598 | 17,624 | 19,510 | 24,701 |
Netherlands | 913 | 1,105 | 1,318 | 1,502 | 1,823 | 2,188 | 2,660 | 3,164 | 4,150 | 4,660 | 6,696 | 7,987 |
Norway | 316 | 378 | 490 | 642 | 728 | 886 | 1,041 | 1,286 | 1,601 | 1,834 | 2,370 | 3,812 |
Poland | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7,325 | 12,885 |
Portugal | 860 | 945 | 985 | 1,100 | 1,175 | 1,270 | 1,360 | 1,550 | 1,710 | 1,800 | 2,046 | 2,634 |
Romania | – | – | 760 | 836 | 950 | 1,100 | 1,350 | 1,700 | 2,125 | 2,450 | 5,123 | 6,780 |
Russia/USSR | 10,550 | 11,200 | 12,700 | 14,400 | 22,920 | 23,250 | 21,180 | 32,000 | 43,830 | 52,420 | 32,600 | 75,964 |
Serbia | – | – | – | 320 | 345 | 382 | 432 | 560 | 700 | 725 | – | – |
Spain | 3,600 | 4,150 | 4,700 | 5,400 | 5,300 | 5,400 | 5,675 | 6,500 | 7,333 | 7,450 | 9,498 | 8,511 |
Sweden | 557 | 617 | 729 | 860 | 1,025 | 1,385 | 1,700 | 2,358 | 3,261 | 3,824 | 4,627 | 6,908 |
Switzerland | 580 | 700 | 930 | 1,200 | 1,460 | 1,920 | 2,100 | 2,599 | 3,355 | 3,700 | 4,300 | 5,063 |
United Kingdom | 8,245 | 10,431 | 12,591 | 16,072 | 19,628 | 23,551 | 29,441 | 36,273 | 40,623 | 44,074 | 43,700 | 56,103 |
Yugoslavia | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3,870 | 5,221 |
Europe | 58,152 | 66,997 | 77,937 | 91,073 | 114,966 | 126,975 | 146,723 | 188,534 | 231,550 | 256,845 | 257,434 | 376,947 |
Western Europe [13] | 38,910 | – | – | 63,670 | – | – | – | 126,900 | - | 163,780 | 179,830 | 231,560 |
Eastern Europe [13] | 19,240 | – | – | 27,400 | – | – | – | 61,640 | – | 93,060 | 77,600 | 145,390 |
Country / Region | 1830 | 1840 | 1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890 | 1900 | 1910 | 1913 | 1925 | 1938 |
The following estimates are taken from a revision of Angus Maddison's numbers for the whole of Europe by the Italian economists Elio Lo Cascio and Paolo Malanima. [14] According to their calculations, the basic level of European GDP (PPP) was historically higher, but its increase was less pronounced.
Year | GDP (PPP) in millions of 1990 International Dollars |
---|---|
1500 | 111,680 |
1600 | 133,760 |
1700 | 159,440 |
1750 | 205,530 |
1800 | 253,900 |
1870 | 619,970 |
Angus Maddison's below GDP estimates for Indian subcontinent (including modern Pakistan and Bangladesh) refer to the following empires: [4]
^ At year 1, year 1000, year 1500 and till the start of British colonisation in India in 17th century, India's GDP always varied between ~22 - 33% world's total GDP and was the largest economy in the world from year 1 until year 1500, [4] which dropped to 2% by Independence of India in 1947. [15] At the same time, the Britain's share of the world economy rose from 2.9% in 1700 up to 9% in 1870 alone. [16] [17] [18]
Year | Indian subcontinent | Per Capita | Avg GDP growth rate | GDP (% World) | Population | Population (% World) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 33,750,000,000 | 450 | – | 32.0 | 70,000,000 | 32.5 |
1000 | 33,750,000,000 | 450 | 0.0% | 28.0 | 72,500,000 | 28 |
1500 | 60,500,000,000 | 550 | 0.117% | 24.4 | 79,000,000 | 25.1 |
1600 | 74,250,000,000 | 550 | 0.205% | 22.4 | 100,000,000 | 24.3 |
1700 | 90,750,000,000 | 550 | 0.201% | 24.4 | 165,000,000 | 27.36 |
1820 | 111,417,000,000 | 533 | 0.171% | 16 | 209,000,000 | 20.1 |
1870 | 134,882,000,000 | 533 | 0.975% | 12.1 | 253,000,000 | 19.9 |
1913 | 204,242,000,000 | 599 | 0.965% | 7.5 | 303,700,000 | 17 |
1950 | 30,600,000,000 | 619 | 0.23% | 4.2 | 359,000,000 | 14.2 |
Angus Maddison's below GDP estimates for China refer to the following empires: [4]
Year | Chinese region | per capita | Avg GDP growth rate | GDP (% World) | Population | Population (% World) | Period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600 | 96,000,000,000 | 600 | 0.44% | 28.95 | 160,000,000 | 28.77 | Ming dynasty |
1700 | 82,800,000,000 | 600 | -0.15% | 22.29 | 138,000,000 | 22.87 | Qing dynasty |
1820 | 228,600,000,000 | 600 | 0.85% | 32.91 | 381,000,000 | 36.57 | |
1870 | 189,740,000,000 | 530 | -0.37% | 17.08 | 358,000,000 | 28.06 | |
1913 | 241,431,000,000 | 552 | 0.56% | 8.83 | 437,140,000 | 24.38 | Republic of China |
Goedele De Keersmaeker estimated the GDP of the British Empire using Angus Maddison's data. Keersmaeker estimated that the British Empire's share of world GDP was 24.28% in 1870 and 19.7% in 1913. The empire's largest economy in 1870 was British India with a 12.15% share of world GDP, followed by the United Kingdom with a 9.03% share. The empire's largest economy in 1913 was the United Kingdom with an 8.22% share of world GDP, followed by British India with a 7.47% share. [20]
Much work in estimating past GDP has been done in the study of the Roman economy, following the pioneering studies by Keith Hopkins (1980) and Raymond Goldsmith (1984). [21] The estimates by Peter Temin, Angus Maddison, Branko Milanović and Peter Fibiger Bang follow the basic method established by Goldsmith, varying mainly only in their set of initial numbers; these are then stepped up to estimations of the expenditure checked by those on the income side. Walter Scheidel/Steven Friesen determine GDP on the relationship between certain significant economic indicators which were historically found to be plausible; two independent control assumptions provide the upper and lower limit of the probable size of the Roman GDP. [22]
B ^ Decimal fractions rounded to the nearest tenth. Italic numbers not directly given by the authors; they are obtained by multiplying the respective value of GDP per capita by estimated population size.
The GDP per capita of the Byzantine Empire, the continuation of the Roman Empire in the east, has been estimated by the World Bank economist Branko Milanović to range between $680 and 770 (in 1990 International Dollars) at its peak around 1000 AD, that is the reign of Basil II. [23] The Byzantine population size at the time is estimated to have been 12 to 18 million. [24] This would yield a total GDP somewhere between $8,160 and 13,860 million.
Year | Roman/Byzantine Empire | per capita | GDP (% World) | Population | Population (% World) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 25,100,000,000 | 570 | 24 | 44,000,000 | 20 |
1000 | 8,160,000,000 | 680 | 6.8 | 12,000,000 | 4.5 |
The gross national income (GNI), previously known as gross national product (GNP), is the total domestic and foreign output claimed by residents of a country, consisting of gross domestic product (GDP), plus factor incomes earned by foreign residents, minus income earned in the domestic economy by nonresidents.
Around 500 BC, the Mahajanapadas minted punch-marked silver coins. The period was marked by intensive trade activity and urban development. By 300 BC, the Maurya Empire had united most of the Indian subcontinent including Tamilakam, which was ruled by Three Crowned Kings. The resulting political unity and military security allowed for a common economic system and enhanced trade and commerce, with increased agricultural productivity.
The study of the economies of the ancient city-state of Rome and its empire during the Republican and Imperial periods remains highly speculative. There are no surviving records of business and government accounts, such as detailed reports of tax revenues, and few literary sources regarding economic activity. Instead, the study of this ancient economy is today mainly based on the surviving archeological and literary evidence that allow researchers to form conjectures based on comparisons with other more recent pre-industrial economies.
This is the Economic history of the Indian subcontinent. It includes the economic timeline of the region, from the ancient era to the present, and briefly summarizes the data presented in the Economic history of India and List of regions by past GDP (PPP) articles.
The World Economy: Historical Statistics is a landmark book by Angus Maddison. Published in 2004 by the OECD Development Centre, it studies the growth of populations and economies across the centuries: not just the world economy as it is now, but how it was in the past.
Classical demography refers to the study of human demography in the Classical period. It often focuses on the absolute number of people who were alive in civilizations around the Mediterranean Sea between the Bronze Age and the fall of the Western Roman Empire, but in recent decades historians have been more interested in trying to analyse demographic processes such as the birth and death rates or the sex ratio of ancient populations. The period was characterized by an explosion in population with the rise of the Greek and Roman civilizations followed by a steep decline caused by economic and social disruption, migrations, and a return to primarily subsistence agriculture. Demographic questions play an important role in determining the size and structure of the economy of Ancient Greece and the Roman economy.
The Great Divergence or European miracle is the socioeconomic shift in which the Western world overcame pre-modern growth constraints and emerged during the 19th century as the most powerful and wealthy world civilizations, eclipsing previously dominant or comparable civilizations from the Middle East and Asia such as Qing China, Mughal India, the Ottoman Empire, Safavid Iran, and Tokugawa Japan, among others.
Angus Maddison was a distinguished British economist specialising in quantitative macro economic history, including the measurement and analysis of economic growth and development.
Raymond W. Goldsmith was an American economist specialising in historical data on national income, saving, financial intermediation, and financial assets and liabilities.
Demographic history is the reconstructed record of human population in the past. Given the lack of population records prior to the 1950s, there are many gaps in our record of demographic history. Historical demographers must make do with estimates, models and extrapolations. For the demographic methodology, see historical demography.
Income in India discusses the financial state in India. With rising economic growth and prosperity, India's income is also rising rapidly. As an overview, India's per capita net national income or NNI was around Rs. 98,374 in 2022-23. The per-capita income is a crude indicator of the prosperity of a country. In contrast, the gross national income at constant prices stood at over 128 trillion rupees. The same year, GRI growth rate at constant prices was around 6.6 percent. While GNI and NNI are both indicators for a country's economic performance and welfare, the GNI is related to the GDP or the Gross Domestic Product plus the net receipts from abroad, including wages and salaries, property income, net taxes and subsidies receivable from abroad. On the other hand, the NNI of a country is equal to its GNI net of depreciation.
The role and scale of British imperial policy during the British Raj on India's relative decline in global GDP remains a topic of debate among economists, historians, and politicians. Some commentators argue that the effect of British rule was negative, and that Britain engaged in a policy of deindustrialisation in India for the benefit of British exporters, which left Indians relatively poorer than before British rule. Others argue that Britain's impact on India was either broadly neutral or positive, and that India's declining share of global GDP was due to other factors, such as new mass production technologies or internal ethnic conflict.
The economic history of the world encompasses the development of human economic activity throughout time. It has been estimated that throughout prehistory, the world average GDP per capita was about $158 per annum, and did not rise much until the Industrial Revolution. Cattle were probably the first object or physical thing specifically used in a way similar enough to the modern definition of money, that is, as a medium for exchange.
Papyrus evidence from Roman Egypt suggests like other more recent and thus better documented pre-modern societies, the Roman Empire experienced high infant mortality, a low marriage age, and high fertility within marriage. Perhaps half of the Roman subjects died by the age of 10. Of those still alive at age 10, half would die by the age of 50.
Elio Lo Cascio is an Italian historian and teacher of Roman history at the Sapienza University of Rome. Lo Cascio's main research interests are the institutional, administrative, social and economic history of Ancient Rome from the Republic to the Late Empire, and Roman population history.
Paolo Malanima is an Italian economic historian, Professor Emeritus of Economic History at the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, and former director of the Institute of Studies on Mediterranean Societies in Naples. Malanima's main research interests are long-term developments in economic history, particularly the performance of the Italian economy since Classical antiquity, history of energy and global history.
The Maddison Project, also known as the Maddison Historical Statistics Project, is a project to collate historical economic statistics, such as GDP, GDP per capita, and labor productivity.
In conclusion, the fact that the average incomes in the most developed agricultural economies like Augustan Rome and Basil's Byzantium were about twice or less than the subsistence minimum might indicate that the pre-industrial societies were unlikely to ever exceed that ceiling. This in turn has implications for our assessment of the average standard of living in other, non-Western, pre-industrial economies like those of China, India, pre-Columbian Americas, and Africa....A further implication of these calculations is that a realistic maximum income that could be envisaged for the pre-industrial societies might be a bit more than twice the subsistence minimum, or around $PPP 1000 (at 1990 international prices).