Peloroplites

Last updated

Peloroplites
Temporal range: Late Cretaceous, 98.2–93  Ma
Peloroplites price 1.jpg
Peloroplites skeletal reconstruction on display at the USU Eastern Prehistoric Museum, Price, Utah
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Ornithischia
Clade: Thyreophora
Clade: Ankylosauria
Family: Nodosauridae
Subfamily: Polacanthinae
Genus: Peloroplites
Carpenter et al., 2008
Species:
P. cedrimontanus
Binomial name
Peloroplites cedrimontanus
Carpenter et al., 2008

Peloroplites (meaning "monstrous heavy one") is a monospecific genus of nodosaurid dinosaur from Utah that lived during the Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian to lower Turonian stage, 98.2 to 93 Ma) in what is now the Mussentuchit Member of the Cedar Mountain Formation. The type and only species, Peloroplites cedrimontanus, is known from a partial skull and postcranial skeleton. It was named in 2008 by Kenneth Carpenter and colleagues. Peloroplites was 6 metres (20 feet) long and weighed 2 tonnes (4,410 lbs), making it one of the largest known nodosaurids, and came from a time when ankylosaurids and nodosaurids were attaining large sizes. [1] [2]

Contents

Discovery and Naming

Outcrops of the Cedar Mountain Formation in Utah Cedar mountain.jpg
Outcrops of the Cedar Mountain Formation in Utah

In 2001, a skeleton of a large nodosaurid from the Cedar Mountain Formation in Emery County, Utah was mentioned by Burge and Bird in a publication about the faunal composition of the Price River II quarry. More material was obtained and was subsequently described in 2008 by Kenneth Carpenter, Jeff Bartlett, John Bird and Reese Barrick. The Price River II quarry was previously reported as occurring in the Ruby Ranch Member by Burge and Bird (2001) but was later reported as occurring in the base of the Mussentuchit Member due to the dark, carbonaceous nature of mudstones of the strata. The Price River II quarry has also produced specimens pertaining to four individuals of a new brachiosaurid, an iguanodontid, associated cranial and postcranial material of Cedarpelta , a turtle and a pterosaur. The holotype specimen, CEUM 26331, consists of a partial skull. Additional specimens were assigned to Peloroplites that consist of cervical vertebrae, dorsal vertebrae, synsacrums, caudal vertebrae, chevron, scapula-coracoids, humeri, radii, ulnae, ilia, pubis, ischium, femora, tibiae, fibulae, metacarpals, metatarsal, metapodials, phalanges, unguals, osteoderms and various bone fragments. The holotype and assigned specimens are currently housed at the College of Eastern Utah, Prehistoric Museum, Utah. [1]

The generic name, Peloroplites, is derived from the Greek words "peloros" (monstrous, gigantic) and "hoplites" (heavily armed), and as a subjunctive, a heavily armed soldier. The specific name, cedrimontanus, is derived from the Latin words "cedrus" (Cedar) and "mont-" (mountain), in reference to the Cedar Mountain Formation. [1]

Carpenter et al. (2008) suggested that some of the large nodosaurid material from the Ruby Ranch Member of the Cedar Mountain Formation that has been questionably identified as Sauropelta may actually belong to Peloroplites. If the material does belong to Peloroplites, then it would extend the stratigraphic range based on a specimen described by Warren and Carpenter (2004). However, one specimen tentatively referred to Sauropelta cannot be assigned to either that genus or to Peloroplites. The specimen was obtained from the Poison Strip Sandstone Member of the Cedar Mountain Formation and assigned to Hoplitosaurus by Bodily (1969) based on the morphology of the spines. The compressed, triangular spines of the specimen are characteristic of polacanthines, which also includes Hoplitosaurus. Carpenter et al. (2008) considered that the specimen probably represents an unnamed large polacanthine. [1]

Description

Size and distinguishing traits

Reconstructed skeletal mount Peloroplites display medium-shot.webp
Reconstructed skeletal mount

Carpenter et al. (2008) originally gave Peloroplites an estimated length of 5-5.5 metres (16-18 feet). [1] However, Gregory S. Paul in 2016 gave a higher estimate of 6 metres (20 feet) and a weight of 2 tonnes (4,410 lbs). [2]

Carpenter et al. (2008) diagnosed Peloroplites based on the lack of premaxillary teeth, occiput sloping forwards and towards the back, the absence of a prominent lateral temporal notch towards the back as in Sauropelta , small and blunt squamosal horns, paroccipital process projecting from the sides, a vertical quadrate that isn’t anteriorly bowed or sloped on the underside of the front, a very short odontoid, a short axis centrum which is as long as it is tall, and similar coracoid to scapula proportions to Animantarx and Edmontonia . [1]

Cranium

Skull of Peloroplites in anterodorsal view Peloroplites skull price.jpg
Skull of Peloroplites in anterodorsal view

The skull of Peloroplites has an estimated length of 56 cm and a maximum width of 35.5 cm between the dorsal orbital rims, which is about the same width as Sauropelta . The snout tapers towards the front and ends at a relatively broad premaxillary beak, as compared to Silvisaurus . The premaxillae are fused along their mid-line and are dorsoventrally thick, unlike Gastonia whereas they are thin. Although the side of the left premaxilla is damaged, the width of the premaxillary beak is estimated to be 18 cm. The upper side of the premaxillae is rugose for the keratinous beak and arched in front view. In addition, the beak has a broad, inverted U-shaped notch. A groove is present near the lower margins of the beak in front view and continues to the palatal side, defining the side edge of the tomial ridge. Both the prefrontals and lachrymals are fused and the presence of the lachrymals is inferred from the lachrymal foramen seen within the front orbital wall. Both sets of prefrontal-lachrymals are triangular in upper and side view and have rugose sculpturing external surfaces that are composed of irregular pits which is especially prominent over the orbits. The front of the orbit has a faint, shallow groove which extends onto the upper surface of the prefrontal and probably outline the margins between adjoining keratinous scales, a feature also similarly seen in other nodosaurids such as Edmontonia . The prefrontal-lachrymals are divided by the front orbital wall towards the middle, which separates the orbit from the nasal cavity. The orbit has a concave upper surface. The postorbital, squamosal, jugal, quadratojugal, and quadrate are coossified on both sides of the skull. The postorbital horncores are conical structures that are very low that project dorsolaterally, which are much less prominent than those of Pawpawsaurus , Sauropelta and Gastonia. The jugal-quadratojugal horncores appear as low, localized thickening of bone as they are not prominent on the skull unlike Gastonia and Animantarx . The jugal probably composes the ventral rim of the orbit and forms a medial-lateral narrow floor to the orbit. As in other dinosaurs, the posterior rim of the orbit is composed of the postorbital and jugal. The orbit is widely separated from the lateral temporal fenestra on the sides of the skull, as in Edmontonia and Pawpawsaurus. The squamosal is fused to the head of the quadrate and the quadrates are slightly bowed towards the front. The frontoparietal region is slightly domed and is moderately arched towards the sides in posterior view. The paroccipital process faces obliquely downwards, similar to Edmontonia and Animantarx. As in other nodosaurids, the supraoccipital crest is weakly developed. The proatlas has a facet that is seen on the right side, although it is partially damaged. The exoccipital is also damaged on the left side while the exoccipital-basioccipital suture of the right side is fused. The occipital condyle has the typical shape of nodosaurids, and the condyle neck has an upper surface that is slightly concave. The basioccipital-basisphenoid suture is fused on the underside and the basioccipital is twice as long as the basisphenoid. The posterior pterygoid plate is present anterior to the parasphenoid and is concave as in Edmontonia. A tooth from a maxillary fragment is similar to some teeth referred to Priconodon and has an extensive wear facet that extends the entire face of the crown as seen in ankylosaurids. [1]

Skull of Peloroplites in lateral view Peloroplites head.webp
Skull of Peloroplites in lateral view

Only the rear portions of the left and right mandibles are preserved and include the articular, angular, surangular and prearticular. The posterior surface is remodelled on the sides and gives the appearance of a coossified osteoderm. However, the internal surface of the mandible is revealed by a crack on the right portion and does not support such interpretation. The adductor fossa is large and lateral-medially and is separated from the articular by a wall, both are features that are not seen in Edmontonia or Animantarx. The articular cotyle is deeper relative to the size of the bone and may correspond to the deeper and thicker retroarticular as well. The large size of the adductor fossa, along with the large teeth, suggest a strong correlation that might relate to a diet of tougher forage. [1]

Postcrania

Reconstructed skeleton in anterior view Peloroplites price 5.jpg
Reconstructed skeleton in anterior view

The total vertebral count of Peloroplites is unknown and the atlas has not been found. The axis is nearly complete but lacks the neural spine and postzygapophyses. The fragment of neural spine is more recumbent than in Sauropelta and the centrum is almost as tall as it is long, unlike Sauropelta. Additionally, the sides of the centrum are concave, and the odontoid is short rather than long as in Sauropelta. The prezygapophysis is seen on the right side of the atlas, near the neural canal. The diapophysis is short and located at the end of the midline on the centrum which is contrast to Sauropelta as it occurs on the neural arch instead. The post-atlas cervical vertebrae consist mostly of centra except for one nearly complete anterior cervical. The centrum of this vertebra is short and slopes to the point where the posterior articular face is lower than the anterior face, a feature seen in Edmontonia but not Sauropelta or Cedarpelta . Unlike Cedarpelta, Sauropelta and Edmontonia, the articular face of Peloroplites is circular, rather than heart-shaped, hexagonal or horizontally ellipsoid. The neural spine of the anterior cervical was anteroposteriorly narrow and the anterior margin of the spine extends down between the prezygapophyses as a ridge. The neural arch is anteroposteriorly short, tall and erect which results in the postzygapophyses not reaching the level of the posterior face of the centrum. The prezygapophysis is short and angled upwards while the diapophysis is long and steeply angled towards the ventral and posterior sides. The dorsal vertebrae are represented by several vertebrae. The centra are amphiplatyan, lack nodochordal projections and are shorter than tall, specifically in the centra of the anterior dorsal vertebrae. The centrum of Peloroplites is strongly concave in the ventral margin and the prezygapophyses are steeply angled. The transverse processes are angled upwards and end in subtriangular diapophyses. In addition, a ridge extends along the transverse process ventrally to the parapophysis located on a short neural arch. As typical for other ankylosaurs, the ribs are coossified with the vertebrae. The synsacrum of Peloroplites consists of six coossified vertebrae, as in Silvisaurus. The vertebrae consist of three probably true sacrals, a dorsal and two caudal vertebrae. All the synsacral vertebrae are missing neural spines and most of the neural arches which may have been lost prior to burial. The sacral ribs are damaged with the exception for the right second rib which retains a portion of the acetabular facet. The caudal vertebrae are represented by different parts of the tail. The anterior caudal has a centrum that is wider than tall and is proportionally longer relative to height. The caudal ribs are fused to the centrum and project laterally unlike Edmontonia or Sauropelta. The distal ends of the ribs are expanded and lack a developed dorsal process. The caudal ribs also project laterally and ventrally. The caudal neural spines were expanded towards the sides. The neural arch encloses a subcircular neural canal. The centrum of the distal caudal vertebrae elongated relative to its height. [1]

Tibia, vertebra and scutes of the closely related Polacanthus Polacanthus Hulke.jpg
Tibia, vertebra and scutes of the closely related Polacanthus

The right scapula and coracoid are coossified and are almost complete. The scapula has a damaged acromion process, which appear to be pathological due to avulsion of the deltoideus clavicularis. The remains of the acromion process indicates that it had a similar position on scapula as Edmontonia. The scapular blade is intermediate in shape between curved and straight. The posterior margin of the scapula is rounded and, like most ankylosaurs, is large and deep. The coracoid almost as long as the scapula and is pierced by the coracoid foramen. Parts of the humeri are known and enough of the crest remains to show that the humeral shaft is elongated in a similar condition to Sauropelta, Edmontonia, Animantarx, and Gastonia. The radial and ulnar condyles are widely separated. The radius more closely resembles that of Edmontonia as the radius lacks the extreme expanded ends seen in Sauropelta. The ulna is long and straight unlike the bowed ulna of Sauropelta or the short and massive of Cedarpelta and Gastonia. The olecranon process partially overhangs the humeral notch. The carpals are unknown and a partial manus was found in loose association with some of the forelimb material. The manus has a complete set of metacarpals. The metacarpals have proximal ends that are faceted and fit close against one another. Metacarpal I is sub-rectangular and has a subtriangular proximal end, a condition similar to that of ceratopsians. In addition, metacarpal I is the largest in the manus and no distal condyles. The rest of the metacarpals are hourglass shaped and have expanded proximal and distal ends. Metacarpal II has a subtriangular proximal end and weakly separated distal condyles. As in other ankylosaurs, metacarpal III is the most robust and longest metacarpal in the manus. The distal condyles of metacarpal III are separate unlike Sauropelta and Nodosaurus . Metacarpal IV is roughly the same length as metacarpal I and is subpentagonal. The distal condyles of metacarpal IV form a single surface rather than being separate. The smallest metacarpal in the series is metacarpal V, although it is slightly more robust than metacarpal IV. Metacarpal V has a rounded distal end, with no development of condyles that are separated. All the phalanges are anteroposteriorly short, have very shallow proximal articular surfaces and lack distal condyles. Due to the shortness of the phalanges, the lateral collateral ligament pits are absent. Phalanx I-1 is the largest and the longest of the phalanxes. The distal unguals are disc-shapes as they are wider than long and rounded. [1]

Femur of the closely related Hoplitosaurus Hoplitosaurus femur.jpg
Femur of the closely related Hoplitosaurus

A 2011 study by Philip J. Senter suggested that the metacarpal configuration of Peloroplites and other ankylosaurs were positioned in a vertical semi-tube configuration, similar to that of sauropods, as the metacarpals are wedge-shaped in proximal view which fit tightly in such position without gaps between the proximal gaps and proximal surfaces. [3] A right ilium and left pubis represent the only material of the pelvis. The preacetabular process of the pelvis diverges 55° unlike Sauropelta where it diverges 39° and 28° in Edmontonia. However, the degree of divergence might possibly be an artefact of not having a complete medial surface. The postacetabular process is broad and short. Additionally, the lateral surface is almost straight rather than concave. The pubis is robust and has a lateral face that forms the anterior wall of the acetabulum. The preacetabular process is short, straight and thick, while the postpubic process is short and angled posteroventrally. Both the left and right femora are complete and are relatively straight shafted. The head of the femora are set at a slight upward angle. The left femur preserves an oblique transverse ridge that is present below the greater trochanter but is damaged and better seen on the right femur. The cnemial crest of the tibia is short and rounded in profile. The tibial shaft is thick throughout its length and astragalus is not fused to the distal end of the tibia. Only a right metatarsal and ungual are known of the hindfoot. The metatarsal is proportionally shorter and more robust than the metacarpals of the manus. As in Sauropelta, the proximal end of the metatarsal is sloped laterally in anterior view and the distal condyles are well developed. The ungual is broad throughout its length. [1]

Phylogeny

Carpenter et al. (2008) originally placed Peloroplites within Nodosauridae but did not conduct a phylogenetic analysis to determine its exact relationships within the clade. [1] Thompson et al. (2012) recovered Peloroplites as sister taxon to Polacanthus , a position also recovered by Chen et al. (2013). [4] [5] However, Yang et al. (2013) found Peloroplites to be sister taxon to both Taohelong and Polacanthus, while Zheng et al. (2018) found it to be sister taxon to Taohelong and a large clade containing more nested taxa such as Nodosaurus , Edmontonia , Struthiosaurus and Europelta . [6] Rivera-Sylva et al. (2018) placed Peloroplites as sister taxon to Sauropelta , Taohelong and a clade containing more nested taxa. [7]

A phylogenetic analysis conducted by Rivera-Sylva et al. (2018) and modified by Madzia et al. (2021) is reproduced below. [7] [8]

Nodosauridae

The results of an earlier analysis by Thompson et al. (2012) are reproduced below. [4]

Nodosauridae

Paleobiology

Animantarx, another ankylosaur from the Cedar Mountain Formation Animantarx.jpg
Animantarx, another ankylosaur from the Cedar Mountain Formation

Peloroplites is known from the uppermost part of the Cedar Mountain Formation, a layer known as the Mussentuchit Member. The layer was originally interpreted as being of Aptian to Albian age (~109–116 Ma) using radiometric dating. [1] However, other radioistopic datings places the Mussentuchit Member in the Cenomanian to early Turonian age (98.2 ± 0.6 to 93 Ma). [9] The Mussentuchit Member has been interpreted as a either a wet, lacustrine environment or a fluvial environment like a distal delta system at the western margin of the Western Interior Seaway. [9]

Peloroplites was contemporaneous with the basal hadrosauromorph Eolambia , [10] the brachiosaurid sauropod Abydosaurus , [11] the tyrannosauroid Moros, [12] the carcharodontosaurian Siats , the indeterminate coelurosaur Richardoestesia , [13] the ankylosaurs Animantarx and Cedarpelta, [14] [1] the thescelosaurid cf. Zephyrosaurus , [15] an indeterminate neoceratopsian, [15] an indeterminate pachycephalosaurid, [15] an indeterminate velociraptorine [15] and an indeterminate dromaeosaurine. [15] Non-dinosaur taxa contemporaneous with Peloroplites include the crocodylomorphs Dakotasuchus , [16] cf. Bernissartia [15] and Machimosaurus , [15] the lizards Bicuspidon , Dimekodontosaurus, cf. Pseudosaurillus , Bothriagenys, Harmodontosaurus, Dicothodon and Primaderma, [17] the snake Coniophis , [17] the amphibian Albanerpeton , [15] the turtles Glyptops and Naomichelys , [15] the mammals Astroconodon , Spalacotherium , Symmetrodontoides, Paracimexomys and Kokopellia, [15] the batoids Ischyrhiza and cf. Baibisha, [15] the hybodonts Polyacrodus, Lissodus and Hybodus , [15] and the lungfish Ceratodus . [15]

Related Research Articles

<i>Animantarx</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Animantarx is a genus of nodosaurid ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Early and Late Cretaceous of western North America. Like other nodosaurs, it would have been a slow-moving quadrupedal herbivore covered in heavy armor scutes, but without a tail club. The skull measures approximately 25 cm in length, suggesting the animal as a whole was no more than 3 meters long.

<i>Hypselosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Hypselosaurus is a dubious genus of titanosaurian sauropod that lived in southern France during the Late Cretaceous, approximately 70 million years ago in the early Maastrichtian. Hypselosaurus was first described in 1846, but was not formally named until 1869, when Phillip Matheron named it under the binomial Hypselosaurus priscus. The holotype specimen includes a partial hindlimb and a pair of caudal vertebrae, and two eggshell fragments were found alongside these bones. Because of the proximity of these eggshells to the fossil remains, many later authors, including Matheron and Paul Gervais, have assigned several eggs from the same region of France all to Hypselosaurus, although the variation and differences between these eggs suggest that they do not all belong to the same taxon. Hypselosaurus has been found in the same formation as the dromaeosaurids Variraptor and Pyroraptor, the ornithopod Rhabdodon, and the ankylosaurian Rhodanosaurus, as well as indeterminate bones from other groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ankylosauridae</span> Extinct family of dinosaurs

Ankylosauridae is a family of armored dinosaurs within Ankylosauria, and is the sister group to Nodosauridae. The oldest known ankylosaurids date to around 122 million years ago and went extinct 66 million years ago during the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. These animals were mainly herbivorous and were obligate quadrupeds, with leaf-shaped teeth and robust, scute-covered bodies. Ankylosaurids possess a distinctly domed and short snout, wedge-shaped osteoderms on their skull, scutes along their torso, and a tail club.

<i>Andesaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Andesaurus is a genus of basal titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur which existed during the middle of the Cretaceous Period in South America. Like most sauropods, belonging to one of the largest animals ever to walk the Earth, it would have had a small head on the end of a long neck and an equally long tail.

<i>Sauropelta</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Sauropelta is a genus of nodosaurid dinosaur that existed in the Early Cretaceous Period of North America. One species has been named. Anatomically, Sauropelta is one of the most well-understood nodosaurids, with fossilized remains recovered in the U.S. states of Wyoming, Montana, and possibly Utah. It is also the earliest known genus of nodosaurinae; most of its remains are found in a section of the Cloverly Formation dated to 108.5 million years ago.

<i>Texasetes</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Texasetes is a genus of ankylosaurian dinosaurs from the late Lower Cretaceous of North America. This poorly known genus has been recovered from the Paw Paw Formation near Haslet, Tarrant County, Texas, which has also produced the nodosaurid ankylosaur Pawpawsaurus.

<i>Cedarpelta</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Cedarpelta is an extinct genus of basal ankylosaurid dinosaur from Utah that lived during the Late Cretaceous period in what is now the Mussentuchit Member of the Cedar Mountain Formation. The type and only species, Cedarpelta bilbeyhallorum, is known from multiple specimens including partial skulls and postcranial material. It was named in 2001 by Kenneth Carpenter, James Kirkland, Don Burge, and John Bird. Cedarpelta has an estimated length of 7 metres and weight of 5 tonnes (11,023 lbs). The skull of Cedarpelta lacks extensive cranial ornamentation and is one of the only known ankylosaurs with individual skull bones that are not completely fused together.

<i>Huabeisaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Huabeisaurus was a genus of dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous. It was a sauropod which lived in what is present-day northern China. The type species, Huabeisaurus allocotus, was first described by Pang Qiqing and Cheng Zhengwu in 2000. Huabeisaurus is known from numerous remains found in the 1990s, which include teeth, partial limbs and vertebrae. Due to its relative completeness, Huabeisaurus represents a significant taxon for understanding sauropod evolution in Asia. Huabeisaurus comes from Kangdailiang and Houyu, Zhaojiagou Town, Tianzhen County, Shanxi province, China. The holotype was found in the unnamed upper member of the Huiquanpu Formation, which is Late Cretaceous (?Cenomanian–?Campanian) in age based on ostracods, charophytes, and fission-track dating.

<i>Mymoorapelta</i> Extinct genus of ornithischian dinosaur

Mymoorapelta is a nodosaurid ankylosaur from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation of western Colorado and central Utah, USA. The animal is known from a single species, Mymoorapelta maysi, and few specimens are known. The most complete specimen is the holotype individual from the Mygatt-Moore Quarry, which includes osteoderms, a partial skull, vertebrae, and other bones. It was initially described by James Kirkland and Kenneth Carpenter in 1994. Along with Gargoyleosaurus, it is one of the earliest known nodosaurids.

<i>Tianzhenosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Tianzhenosaurus is a genus of ankylosaurid dinosaurs known from the Late Cretaceous Huiquanpu Formation of Shanxi Province, China. The genus contains two species, T. youngi and T. chengi. Some researchers have suggested that Tianzhenosaurus may represent a junior synonym of Saichania, an ankylosaurine from the Barun Goyot and Nemegt formations.

Venenosaurus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur that lived in what is now Utah during the Early Cretaceous. Its type and only species is Venenosaurus dicrocei. Fossils of Venenosaurus were first discovered in 1998, by Denver Museum of Natural History volunteer Anthony DiCroce, and described as a new genus and species in 2001 by Virginia Tidwell and colleagues, who named the species for DiCroce. Venenosaurus was a relatively small sauropod, and was similar to Cedarosaurus, another sauropod from the Early Cretaceous of Utah.

<i>Panoplosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Panoplosaurus is a genus of armoured dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada. Few specimens of the genus are known, all from the middle Campanian of the Dinosaur Park Formation, roughly 76 to 75 million years ago. It was first discovered in 1917, and named in 1919 by Lawrence Lambe, named for its extensive armour, meaning "well-armoured lizard". Panoplosaurus has at times been considered the proper name for material otherwise referred to as Edmontonia, complicating its phylogenetic and ecological interpretations, at one point being considered to have existed across Alberta, New Mexico and Texas, with specimens in institutions from Canada and the United States. The skull and skeleton of Panoplosaurus are similar to its relatives, but have a few significant differences, such as the lumpy form of the skull osteoderms, a completely fused shoulder blade, and regularly shaped plates on its neck and body lacking prominent spines. It was a quadrupedal animal, roughly 5 m (16 ft) long and 1,600 kg (3,500 lb) in weight. The skull has a short snout, with a very domed surface, and bony plates directly covering the cheek. The neck had circular groups of plates arranged around the top surface, both the forelimb and hindlimb were about the same length, and the hand may have only included three fingers. Almost the entire surface of the body was covered in plates, osteoderms and scutes of varying sizes, ranging from large elements along the skull and neck, to smaller, round bones underneath the chin and body, to small ossicles that filled in the spaces between other, larger osteoderms.

<i>Antarctopelta</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Antarctopelta is a genus of ankylosaurian dinosaur, a group of large, quadrupedal herbivores, that lived during the Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous period on what is now James Ross Island, Antarctica. Antarctopelta is the only known ankylosaur from Antarctica and a member of Parankylosauria. The only described specimen was found in 1986, the first dinosaur to be found on the continent, by Argentine geologists Eduardo Olivero and Robert Scasso. The fossils were later described in 2006 by paleontologists Leonardo Salgado and Zulma Gasparini, who named the type species A. oliveroi after Olivero.

<i>Ahshislepelta</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Ahshislepelta is a monospecific genus of ankylosaur dinosaur from New Mexico that lived during the Late Cretaceous in what is now the Hunter Wash Member of the Kirtland Formation. The type and only species, Ahshislepelta minor, is known only from an incomplete postcranial skeleton of a small subadult or adult individual. It was named in 2011 by Michael Burns and Robert M. Sullivan. Based on the size of the humerus, Ahshislepelta is larger than Pinacosaurus mephistocephalus but smaller than Talarurus and Pinacosaurus grangeri.

<i>Europelta</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Europelta is a monospecific genus of nodosaurid dinosaur from Spain that lived during the Early Cretaceous in what is now the lower Escucha Formation of the Teruel Province. The type and only species, Europelta carbonensis, is known from two associated partial skeletons, and represents the most complete ankylosaur known from Europe. Europelta was named in 2013 by James I. Kirkland and colleagues. Europelta has an estimated length of 5 metres and weight of 1.3 tonnes, making it the largest member of the clade Struthiosaurini.

<i>Chuanqilong</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Chuanqilong is a monospecific genus of basal ankylosaurid dinosaur from the Liaoning Province, China that lived during the Early Cretaceous in what is now the Jiufotang Formation. The type and only species, Chuanqilong chaoyangensis, is known from a nearly complete skeleton with a skull of a juvenile individual. It was described in 2014 by Fenglu Han, Wenjie Zheng, Dongyu Hu, Xing Xu, and Paul M. Barrett. Chuanqilong shows many similarities with Liaoningosaurus and may represent a later ontogenetic stage of the taxon.

<i>Zhongjianosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Zhongjianosaurus is a genus of dromaeosaurid belonging to the Microraptoria. Believed to hail from the Yixian Formation, specifically the middle of the Jehol Biota, it is the smallest known microraptorine thus far discovered and one of the smallest non-avian theropod dinosaurs.

<i>Akainacephalus</i> Ankylosaurid dinosaur genus from Late Cretaceous Utah

Akainacephalus is a monospecific genus of ankylosaurid dinosaur from southern Utah that lived during the Late Cretaceous in what is now the Horse Mountain Gryposaur Quarry of the Kaiparowits Formation. The type and only species, Akainacephalus johnsoni, is known from the most complete ankylosaur specimen ever discovered from southern Laramidia, including a complete skull, tail club, a number of osteoderms, limb elements and part of its pelvis, among other remains. It was described in 2018 by Jelle P. Wiersma and Randall B. Irmis. It is closely related and shares similar cranial anatomy to Nodocephalosaurus.

<i>Invictarx</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Invictarx is a monospecific genus of nodosaurid dinosaur from New Mexico that lived during the Late Cretaceous in what is now the upper Allison Member of the Menefee Formation. The type and only species, Invictarx zephyri, is known from three isolated, incomplete postcranial skeletons. It was named in 2018 by Andrew T. McDonald and Douglas G. Wolfe. Invictarx shares similarities with Glyptodontopelta from the Naashoibito member of the Ojo Alamo Formation, New Mexico.

<i>Dynamoterror</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Dynamoterror is a monospecific genus of tyrannosaurid dinosaur from New Mexico that lived during the Late Cretaceous in what is now the upper Allison Member of the Menefee Formation. The type and only species, Dynamoterror dynastes, is known from a subadult or adult individual about 9 metres long with an incomplete associated skeleton. It was named in 2018 by Andrew T. McDonald, Douglas G. Wolfe and Alton C. Dooley, Jr. Dynamoterror was closely related to Teratophoneus and Lythronax.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Carpenter, Kenneth; Bartlett, Jeff; Bird, John; Barrick, Reese (2008). "Ankylosaurs from the Price River Quarries, Cedar Mountain Formation (Lower Cretaceous), east-central Utah". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 28 (4): 1089–1101. Bibcode:2008JVPal..28.1089C. doi:10.1671/0272-4634-28.4.1089. S2CID   129480044.
  2. 1 2 Paul, G.S., 2016, The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs 2nd Edition, Princeton University Press
  3. Senter, Phil (2011). "Evidence for a Sauropod-Like Metacarpal Configuration in Ankylosaurian Dinosaurs". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 56 (1): 221–224. doi: 10.4202/app.2010.0041 . S2CID   198121272.
  4. 1 2 Richard S. Thompson, Jolyon C. Parish, Susannah C. R. Maidment and Paul M. Barrett, 2012, "Phylogeny of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs (Ornithischia: Thyreophora)", Journal of Systematic Palaeontology10(2): 301–312
  5. Rongjun Chen; Wenjie Zheng; Yoichi Azuma; Masateru Shibata; Tianliang Lou; Qiang Jin; Xingsheng Jin (2013). "A New Nodosaurid Ankylosaur from the Chaochuan Formation of Dongyang, Zhejiang Province, China". Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition). 87 (3): 658–671. Bibcode:2013AcGlS..87..658C. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.12077. S2CID   128421549.
  6. Yang J.-T.; You H.-L.; Li D.-Q.; Kong D.-L. (2013). "First discovery of polacanthine ankylosaur dinosaur in Asia" (PDF). Vertebrata PalAsiatica (in Chinese and English). 51 (4): 265–277.
  7. 1 2 Rivera-Sylva, H.E.; Frey, E.; Stinnesbeck, W.; Carbot-Chanona, G.; Sanchez-Uribe, I.E.; Guzmán-Gutiérrez, J.R. (2018). "Paleodiversity of Late Cretaceous Ankylosauria from Mexico and their phylogenetic significance". Swiss Journal of Palaeontology . 137 (1): 83–93. Bibcode:2018SwJP..137...83R. doi: 10.1007/s13358-018-0153-1 . ISSN   1664-2376. S2CID   134924657.
  8. Madzia, D.; Arbour, V.M.; Boyd, C.A.; Farke, A.A.; CruzadoCaballero, P.; Evans, D.C. (2021). "The phylogenetic nomenclature of ornithischian dinosaurs". PeerJ. 9: e12362. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12362 . PMC   8667728 . PMID   34966571. S2CID   245111393.
  9. 1 2 Haviv M. Avrahami; Terry A. Gates; Andrew B. Heckert; Peter J. Makovicky; Lindsay E. Zanno (2018). "A new microvertebrate assemblage from the Mussentuchit Member, Cedar Mountain Formation: insights into the paleobiodiversity and paleobiogeography of early Late Cretaceous ecosystems in western North America". PeerJ. 6: e5883. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5883 . PMC   6241397 . PMID   30479889.
  10. Kirkland, J.I.; Burge, D. (1994). A large primitive hadrosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Utah. Fifty-Fourth Annual Meeting, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. Vol. 14, no. 3. p. 32A. JSTOR   i406457.
  11. Chure, D.; Britt, B.; Whitlock, J.A.; Wilson, J.A. (2010). "First complete sauropod dinosaur skull from the Cretaceous of the Americas and the evolution of sauropod dentition". Naturwissenschaften . 97 (4): 379–391. Bibcode:2010NW.....97..379C. doi:10.1007/s00114-010-0650-6. PMC   2841758 . PMID   20179896.
  12. Zanno, Lindsay E.; Tucker, Ryan T.; Canoville, Aurore; Avrahami, Haviv M.; Gates, Terry A.; Makovicky, Peter J. (February 2019). "Diminutive fleet-footed tyrannosauroid narrows the 70-million-year gap in the North American fossil record". Communications Biology . 2 (1): 64. doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0308-7. ISSN   2399-3642. PMC   6385174 . PMID   30820466.
  13. Kirkland, Lucas and Estep, (1998). "Cretaceous dinosaurs of the Colorado Plateau." in Lucas, Kirkland and Estep (eds.). Lower and Middle Cretaceous Terrestrial Ecosystems. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 14, 79-89.
  14. Carpenter, K., Kirkland, J.I., Burge, D.L., & Bird, J. 1999. Ankylosaurs (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) of the Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, and their stratigraphic distribution. In: Gillette, D. (Ed.) Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah. Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 99-1. Pp. 243-251.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 L. Cifelli, Richard; L. Nydam, Randall; D. Gardener, James; Weil, Anne; G. Eaton, Jeffery; I. Kirkland, James; K. Madsen, Scott (1999). "Medial Cretaceous vertebrates from the Cedar Mountain Formation, Emery County, Utah: the Mussentuchit local fauna". In D. Gillette, David (ed.). Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah, Issue 1; Issue 99. Utah Geological Survey. pp. 219–242. ISBN   9781557916341 . Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  16. Frederickson, Joseph; Cohen, Joshua; Hunt, Tyler; Cifelli, Richard (2017). "A new occurrence of Dakotasuchus kingi from the Late Cretaceous of Utah, USA, and the diagnostic utility of postcranial characters in Crocodyliformes". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 62. doi: 10.4202/app.00338.2016 . ISSN   0567-7920. S2CID   44146129.
  17. 1 2 Nydam, Randall L. (2010). "Lizards of the Mussentuchit Local Fauna (Albian–Cenomanian boundary) and comments on the evolution of the Cretaceous lizard fauna of North America". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 22 (3): 645–660. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2002)022[0645:LOTMLF]2.0.CO;2. S2CID   131449530.