Biochar carbon removal

Last updated
Biochar applied to the soil in research trials in Namibia Biochar Application.jpg
Biochar applied to the soil in research trials in Namibia

Biochar carbon removal (also called pyrogenic carbon capture and storage ) is a negative emissions technology. It involves the production of biochar through pyrolysis of residual biomass and the subsequent application of the biochar in soils or durable materials (e.g. cement, tar). Biochar locks carbon from biomass into a stable, charcoal-like form that can persist in soils for centuries to millennia, instead of returning to the atmosphere as CO2.

Contents

Multi-pool modelling [1] [2] of biochar soil amendments indicates a centennial – millennial turnover rate, depending on factors like feedstocks used, production conditions, application rates and the characteristics of depositional sites. [3] Additionally, biochar and related residues (i.e. pyrogenic carbon) have been demonstrated to have the potential for wider carbon cycling effects such as suppressing greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes from amended soils [4] and benefitting vegetation growth. [5]

In some cases amendment studies and meta-analyses have pointed to undesired effects of biochar soil amendments, such as sub-centennial biochar turnover [6] , increased GHG fluxes [4] and degradation of non-biochar soil carbon stocks. [7] Biochar carbon removal can thus be deployed as a targeted strategy, for example with appropriate application rates, feedstocks and production conditions for the intended application site. [8]

Definition

Charged and inoculated biochar ready for soil application Charged and inoculated biochar ready for soil application.jpg
Charged and inoculated biochar ready for soil application

The term refers to the practice of producing biochar from sustainably sourced biomass and ensuring that it is stored for a long period of time. The concept makes use of the photosynthesis process, through which plants remove CO2 from the atmosphere during their growth. This carbon dioxide is stabilised within the biochar during the production process and can subsequently be stored potentially for several hundreds or thousands of years. [9]

Biochar Carbon Removal falls into the category of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. [10] [11] It is considered to be a rapidly implemented and, relatively speaking, capital-efficient negative emissions technology ideal for smaller scale installations such as farmers, and also to help rural diversification in developing countries. [12] [13] [14] [15] This is, amongst others, reflected in the guidance documents of the Science Based Targets initiative. [16] [17]

Scientifically, this process is often referred to as Pyrogenic Carbon Capture and Storage (PyCCS). [18] [19] The term biochar carbon removal was introduced by the European Biochar Industry Consortium in 2023 [20] and has since been adopted by various institutions and experts.

Biochar Carbon Removal can also be categorised as a form of Biomass Carbon Removal and Storage (BiCRS). [21]

Beyond carbon sequestration, biochar application has various other potential benefits, such as increased yield and root biomass, water use efficiency and microbial activity. [22]

Biochar production

Biochar is produced through the pyrolysis process. Biomass (e.g. residual plant material from landscaping or agricultural processes) is reduced to smaller pieces is heated to 350–900 °C (662–1,652 °F) under oxygen-deficient conditions. This results in solid biochar and by-products (bio-oil, pyrogas). [23] [19] In order to maximise the carbon storage potential, typically those biochar technologies are used that minimise combustion and avoid the loss of pyrogas into the atmosphere. [18]

In low-oxygen conditions, the thermal-chemical conversion of organic materials (including biomass) produces both volatiles, termed pyrolytic gases (pyrogases), as well as solid carbonaceous co-products, termed biochar. While the pyrogases mostly condense into liquid bio-oil, which may be used as an energy source, biochar has been proposed as a tool for sequestering carbon in soil. [24]

The global biochar market is expected to reach US$368.85 million by 2028. [25]

Internationally there are several voluntary standards that regulate the biochar production process and product quality. These include the following (non-exhaustive list):

Carbon removal potential

Global scope

Three main carbonaceous products are generated during pyrolysis, which can be stored subsequently in different ways to produce negative emissions: a solid biochar for various applications, a pyrolytic liquid (bio-oil) pumped into depleted fossil oil repositories, and permanent-pyrogas (dominated by the combustible gases CO, H2 and CH4) that may be transferred as CO2 to geological storage after combustion. [10]

In 2022/2023, biochar carbon removal accounted for 87–92% of all delivered carbon removals. [28]

The potential extent of carbon removal with biochar is the subject of ongoing research. Using current waste from the farming and forestry industry worldwide, an estimated 6% of global emissions, equivalent to 3 billion tonnes of CO2, could be removed annually over a 100-year time frame. [29] More broadly, the potential is quantified to be between 0.3 and 4.9 billion tonnes of CO2 per year (GtCO2 / yr). [30]

Permanence

Permanence in carbon products is a good indicator of the quality or durability of the material. It also describes the amount of time that carbon can be stored in a material. Biochar is produced by rapidly carbonizing organic matter into maceral. [31] There is evidence that biochar, produced at pyrolysis temperature over 600 °C (1,112 °F), resembles inertinite and thus highly stable. [32] [33] [34] Research suggests that the permanance and therewith removal potential of biochar is generally underestimated due to oversimplified methodologies. [35]

The level to which carbon dioxide is fixed and stored, depends both on the biochar production process and the subsequent application. If produced under certain conditions, 97% of the total organic carbon in biochar is highly refractory carbon, i.e. carbon that has near infinite stability. This implies that biochar can have a very high permanence in terms of carbon dioxide storage. Achieving effective pyrolisis is therefore an important requirement for high permanence. [36]

Applications

There are several applications that are considered to store CO2 for long periods of time:

Biochar-based carbon credits

Biochar Carbon Removal is increasingly seen as a promising negative emissions technology suitable for offsetting and carbon markets. Due to significant carbon abatement cost levels of biochar carbon removal, biochar carbon credits trade at prices an order of magnitude higher than carbon credits based on conventional mitigation methods such as emission reductions and nature-based solutions. Biochar Carbon credits are considered by some to be the best type of Carbon credit as they increase economic viability of the companies claiming them, and biochar stays in soil for hundreds if not thousands of years, ensuring that carbon is locked away from the atmosphere. [44]

Market size

Demand for biochar credits is increasing but trade in biochar carbon removal credits is still limited to a small number of suppliers and credit off-takers. [45] In 2024, biochar projects made up the majority of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) purchases, representing 86% of the total volume bought. [46]

Standards

For the purpose of generating carbon credits, there are several internationally recognised voluntary biochar standards and methodologies. These include the following (non-exhaustive list): [47] [48]

Several biochar production and carbon credit standards define criteria for permissible biomass feedstocks for biochar carbon removal. For example, the European Biochar Certificate (EBC) features a positive list of permissible biomasses for the production of biochar. This list includes agricultural residues, cultivated biomass, residues from forestry operations and sawmills, residues from landscaping activities, recycled feedstock, kitchen waste, food processing residues, textiles, anaerobic digestion, sludges from wastewater treatment, and animal by-products. [49] In order for a credit to be certified suppliers must be carbon net-negative which indicates that they sequester more carbon then they use in the creation and distribution of biochar. [50]

See also

References

  1. Kuzyakov, Yakov; Bogomolova, Irina; Glaser, Bruno (March 2014). "Biochar stability in soil: Decomposition during eight years and transformation as assessed by compound-specific 14C analysis". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 70: 229–236. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.021. ISSN   0038-0717.
  2. Singh, B.P., Cowie, A., Gilkes, R. and Prakongkep, N., 2010, August. The mean turnover time of biochar in soil varies depending on biomass source and pyrolysis temperature. In 19th world congress of soil science, soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane (pp. 1-6).
  3. Wang, Jinyang; Xiong, Zhengqin; Kuzyakov, Yakov (2015-06-19). "Biochar stability in soil: meta‐analysis of decomposition and priming effects". GCB Bioenergy. 8 (3): 512–523. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12266. ISSN   1757-1693.
  4. 1 2 Jeffery, Simon; Verheijen, Frank G.A.; Kammann, Claudia; Abalos, Diego (August 2016). "Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: A meta-analysis". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 101: 251–258. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.021.
  5. Gale, Nigel V.; Thomas, Sean C. (2021). "Spatial heterogeneity in soil pyrogenic carbon mediates tree growth and physiology following wildfire". Journal of Ecology. 109 (3): 1479–1490. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13571. ISSN   1365-2745.
  6. Zimmermann, Michael; Bird, Michael I.; Wurster, Christopher; Saiz, Gustavo; Goodrick, Iain; Barta, Jiri; Capek, Petr; Santruckova, Hana; Smernik, Ronald (2012). "Rapid degradation of pyrogenic carbon". Global Change Biology. 18 (11): 3306–3316. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02796.x. ISSN   1365-2486.
  7. Ding, Fan; Van Zwieten, Lukas; Zhang, Weidong; Weng, Zhe; Shi, Shengwei; Wang, Jingkuan; Meng, Jun (April 2018). "A meta-analysis and critical evaluation of influencing factors on soil carbon priming following biochar amendment". Journal of Soils and Sediments. 18 (4): 1507–1517. doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1899-6. ISSN   1439-0108.
  8. "Biochar for environmental management: an introduction", Biochar for Environmental Management, Routledge, pp. 33–46, 2015-02-20, ISBN   978-0-203-76226-4 , retrieved 2025-09-15
  9. Woolf, Dominic; Amonette, James E.; Street-Perrott, F. Alayne; Lehmann, Johannes; Joseph, Stephen (2010-08-10). "Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change". Nature Communications. 1 (1): 56. doi:10.1038/ncomms1053. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   2964457 . PMID   20975722.
  10. 1 2 Constanze Werner et al. (2018): Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 044036. doi : 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e
  11. N McGlashan; M Workman; B Caldecott; N Shah (October 2012). "Negative Emissions Technologies" (PDF). Grantham Institute for Climate Change. Imperial College London. p. 15. Retrieved 13 June 2023.
  12. Medium.com (2023-03-31). "How biochar emerged as an unexpected champion in the fight against the climate crisis". CEEZER. Retrieved 2023-04-03.
  13. M.A, Aparna (2023-05-16). "Biochar: The Miracle Material For a Sustainable World". Earth.Org. Retrieved 2023-10-21.
  14. Wang, Liuwei; Deng, Jiayu; Yang, Xiaodong; Hou, Renjie; Hou, Deyi (2023-01-16). "Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality". Carbon Research. 2 (1): 2. Bibcode:2023CarRe...2....2W. doi: 10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 . ISSN   2731-6696.
  15. Moya, Berta (2023-11-23). "Biochar is carbon removal's jack of all trades. Here's why". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2024-10-21.
  16. "Forest, Land and Agriculture (FLAG) Guidance". Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi). Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  17. Luckhurst, Karen (2022-10-05). "Biochar: the 'black gold' for soils that is getting big bets on offset markets". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  18. 1 2 Schmidt, Hans-Peter; Anca-Couce, Andrés; Hagemann, Nikolas; Werner, Constanze; Gerten, Dieter; Lucht, Wolfgang; Kammann, Claudia (April 2019). "Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage". GCB Bioenergy. 11 (4): 573–591. Bibcode:2019GCBBi..11..573S. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12553 .
  19. 1 2 Werner, C; Schmidt, H-P; Gerten, D; Lucht, W; Kammann, C (2018-04-01). "Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C". Environmental Research Letters. 13 (4): 044036. Bibcode:2018ERL....13d4036W. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e . ISSN   1748-9326.
  20. "European Biochar Industry Consortium on LinkedIn". www.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  21. Early, Catherine (15 November 2023). "Analysis: why biomass removals credits like biochar are luring investors" . Retrieved 2024-11-08.
  22. Schmidt, Hans-Peter; Kammann, Claudia; Hagemann, Nikolas; Leifeld, Jens; Bucheli, Thomas D.; Sánchez Monedero, Miguel Angel; Cayuela, Maria Luz (November 2021). "Biochar in agriculture – A systematic review of 26 global meta-analyses". GCB Bioenergy. 13 (11): 1708–1730. Bibcode:2021GCBBi..13.1708S. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12889. hdl: 10261/263150 . ISSN   1757-1693.
  23. Gabhane, Jagdish W.; Bhange, Vivek P.; Patil, Pravin D.; Bankar, Sneha T.; Kumar, Sachin (2020-06-30). "Recent trends in biochar production methods and its application as a soil health conditioner: a review". SN Applied Sciences. 2 (7): 1307. doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-3121-5 . ISSN   2523-3971.
  24. 1 2 3 Criscuoli, Irene; Alberti, Giorgio; Baronti, Silvia; Favilli, Filippo; Martinez, Cristina; Calzolari, Costanza; Pusceddu, Emanuela; Rumpel, Cornelia; Viola, Roberto (2014-03-10). "Carbon Sequestration and Fertility after Centennial Time Scale Incorporation of Charcoal into Soil". PLOS ONE. 9 (3): e91114. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...991114C. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091114 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3948733 . PMID   24614647.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  25. 1 2 Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono; Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan; Liang, Xue; Goh, Hui Hwang; Gikas, Petros; Chong, Kok-Keong; Chew, Kit Wayne (April 2023). "Challenges and opportunities for biochar to promote circular economy and carbon neutrality" . Journal of Environmental Management. 332 117429. Bibcode:2023JEnvM.33217429K. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117429. PMID   36773474.
  26. "EBC and WBC guidelines & documents". www.european-biochar.org. Retrieved 2023-09-26.
  27. "Biochar Standards". International Biochar Initiative. Retrieved 2024-11-12.
  28. "cdr.fyi". www.cdr.fyi. Retrieved 2023-12-10.
  29. Lefebvre, David; Fawzy, Samer; Aquije, Camila A.; Osman, Ahmed I.; Draper, Kathleen T.; Trabold, Thomas A. (2023-10-11). "Biomass residue to carbon dioxide removal: quantifying the global impact of biochar". Biochar. 5 (1): 65. Bibcode:2023Bioch...5...65L. doi: 10.1007/s42773-023-00258-2 . ISSN   2524-7867.
  30. Roe, Stephanie; Streck, Charlotte; Obersteiner, Michael; Frank, Stefan; Griscom, Bronson; Drouet, Laurent; Fricko, Oliver; Gusti, Mykola; Harris, Nancy; Hasegawa, Tomoko; Hausfather, Zeke; Havlík, Petr; House, Jo; Nabuurs, Gert-Jan; Popp, Alexander (November 2019). "Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world". Nature Climate Change. 9 (11): 817–828. Bibcode:2019NatCC...9..817R. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9. hdl: 2164/14119 . ISSN   1758-6798.
  31. Sanei, Hamed; Rudra, Arka; Przyswitt, Zia Møller Moltesen; Kousted, Sofie; Sindlev, Marco Benkhettab; Zheng, Xiaowei; Nielsen, Søren Bom; Petersen, Henrik Ingermann (2024-01-05). "Assessing biochar's permanence: An inertinite benchmark". International Journal of Coal Geology. 281 104409. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2023.104409. ISSN   0166-5162.
  32. Sanei, Hamed; Rudra, Arka; Przyswitt, Zia Møller Moltesen; Kousted, Sofie; Sindlev, Marco Benkhettab; Zheng, Xiaowei; Nielsen, Søren Bom; Petersen, Henrik Ingermann (2023-12-09). "Assessing biochar's permanence: An inertinite benchmark". International Journal of Coal Geology. 281 104409. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2023.104409 . ISSN   0166-5162.
  33. Sanei, Hamed; Petersen, Henrik Ingermann (2023-02-22). Carbon permanence of biochar; a lesson learned from the geologically preserved charcoal in carbonaceous rocks (Report). Copernicus Meetings.
  34. Chiaramonti, David; Lotti, Giulia; Vaccari, Francesco Primo; Sanei, Hamed (2024-12-01). "Assessment of long-lived Carbon permanence in agricultural soil: Unearthing 15 years-old biochar from long-term field experiment in vineyard". Biomass and Bioenergy. 191 107484. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107484 . ISSN   0961-9534.
  35. Ringsby, A J; Maher, K (2025-03-01). "Do oversimplified durability metrics undervalue biochar carbon dioxide removal?". Environmental Research Letters. 20 (3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/adac7b . ISSN   1748-9326.
  36. Petersen, H. I.; Lassen, L.; Rudra, A.; Nguyen, L. X.; Do, P. T. M.; Sanei, H. (2023-04-04). "Carbon stability and morphotype composition of biochars from feedstocks in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam". International Journal of Coal Geology. 271 104233. Bibcode:2023IJCG..27104233P. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2023.104233 . ISSN   0166-5162.
  37. Zimmerman, Andrew; Gao, Bin (2013-02-21), "The Stability of Biochar in the Environment", Biochar and Soil Biota, CRC Press, pp. 1–40, doi:10.1201/b14585-2 (inactive 11 July 2025), ISBN   9781466576483 {{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link)
  38. Schmidt, Hans-Peter; Anca-Couce, Andrés; Hagemann, Nikolas; Werner, Constanze; Gerten, Dieter; Lucht, Wolfgang; Kammann, Claudia (2018). "Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage". GCB Bioenergy. 11 (4): 573–591. Bibcode:2019GCBBi..11..573S. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12553 . ISSN   1757-1707.
  39. 1 2 "Web of Science". www.webofscience.com. Retrieved 2024-10-28.
  40. Gan, Xinli; Zhang, Wenli (February 25, 2016). "Application of biochar from crop straw in asphalt modification". PLOS ONE. 16 (2): e0247390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247390 . PMC   7906466 . PMID   33630886.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  41. Adeniyi, Adewale George; Iwuozor, Kingsley O; Emenike, Ebuka Chizitere; Amoloye, Mubarak A; Aransiola, Emmanuel S; Motolani, Fawaz O; Kayode, Sodiq H (2023-03-01). "Prospects and problems in the development of biochar-filled plastic composites: a review". Functional Composites and Structures. 5 (1): 012002. Bibcode:2023FCS.....5a2002A. doi: 10.1088/2631-6331/acb19b . ISSN   2631-6331.
  42. Kane, Seth; Van Roijen, Elisabeth; Ryan, Cecily; Miller, Sabbie (2022-07-01). "Reducing the environmental impacts of plastics while increasing strength: Biochar fillers in biodegradable, recycled, and fossil-fuel derived plastics". Composites Part C. 8 100253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100253 . ISSN   2666-6820.
  43. Al-Rumaihi, Aisha; Alherbawi, Mohammad; Mckay, Gordon; Mackey, Hamish; Parthasarathy, Prakash; Al-Ansari, Tareq (2023-07-05). "Assessing plastic and biomass-based biochar's potential for carbon sequestration: an energy-water-environment approach". Frontiers in Sustainability. 4. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2023.1200094 . ISSN   2673-4524.
  44. "Biochar carbon credits - Removing carbon from the atmosphere | GECA". GECA Environnement. Retrieved 2024-11-12.
  45. Soria, Santiago Canel; Iyer, Anirudh (3 June 2025). "Biochar carbon removal credits mature amid tightening of global supply". S&P Global. Retrieved 15 September 2025.
  46. You, Shou-Hwei Michelle. "The new renewable revolution: Why carbon dioxide removal will transform the carbon market". World Economic Forum. Archived from the original on 2025-06-12. Retrieved 2025-09-15.
  47. "How biochar emerged as an unexpected champion in the fight against the climate crisis". www.ceezer.earth. Retrieved 2023-09-26.
  48. Salma, Alaa; Fryda, Lydia; Djelal, Hayet (February 2024). "Biochar: A Key Player in Carbon Credits and Climate Mitigation". Resources. 13 (2): 31. doi: 10.3390/resources13020031 . ISSN   2079-9276.
  49. EBC (2023) Positive list of permissible biomasses for the production of biochar. production of biochar. https://www.european-biochar.org/media/doc/2/positive-list_en_v10_3.pdf.
  50. "Understanding Biochar Carbon Credits". Wakefield BioChar. Retrieved 2024-11-12.

Videos