History of artificial neural networks

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are models created using machine learning to perform a number of tasks. Their creation was inspired by biological neural circuitry. ^{[1] [a]} While some of the computational implementations ANNs relate to earlier discoveries in mathematics, the first implementation of ANNs was by psychologist Frank Rosenblatt, who developed the perceptron. ^[1] Little research was conducted on ANNs in the 1970s and 1980s, with the AAAI calling this period an "AI winter". ^[2]

Later, advances in hardware and the development of the backpropagation algorithm, as well as recurrent neural networks and convolutional neural networks, renewed interest in ANNs. The 2010s saw the development of a deep neural network (i.e., one with many layers) called AlexNet. ^[3] It greatly outperformed other image recognition models, and is thought to have launched the ongoing AI spring, and further increasing interest in deep learning. ^[4] The transformer architecture was first described in 2017 as a method to teach ANNs grammatical dependencies in language, ^[5] and is the predominant architecture used by large language models such as GPT-4. Diffusion models were first described in 2015, and became the basis of image generation models such as DALL-E in the 2020s.^{[ citation needed ]}

Perceptrons and other early neural networks

Main article: Perceptron

The simplest feedforward network consists of a single weight layer without activation functions. It would be just a linear map, and training it would be linear regression. Linear regression by least squares method was used by Adrien-Marie Legendre (1805) and Carl Friedrich Gauss (1795) for the prediction of planetary movement. ^{[6] [7] [8] [9]}

A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity (Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts, 1943) studied several abstract models for neural networks using symbolic logic of Rudolf Carnap and Principia Mathematica . The paper argued that several abstract models of neural networks (some learning, some not learning) have the same computational power as Turing machines. ^[10] This model paved the way for research to split into two approaches. One approach focused on biological processes while the other focused on the application of neural networks to artificial intelligence. This work led to work on nerve networks and their link to finite automata. ^[11]

In the early 1940s, D. O. Hebb ^[12] created a learning hypothesis based on the mechanism of neural plasticity that became known as Hebbian learning. Hebbian learning is unsupervised learning. This evolved into models for long-term potentiation. Researchers started applying these ideas to computational models in 1948 with Turing's B-type machines. B. Farley and Wesley A. Clark ^[13] (1954) first used computational machines, then called "calculators", to simulate a Hebbian network. Other neural network computational machines were created by Rochester, Holland, Habit and Duda (1956). ^[14]

Frank Rosenblatt ^[1] (1958) created the perceptron, an algorithm for pattern recognition. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) comprised 3 layers: an input layer, a hidden layer with randomized weights that did not learn, and an output layer. With mathematical notation, Rosenblatt described circuitry not in the basic perceptron, such as the exclusive-or circuit that could not be processed by neural networks at the time. In 1959, a biological model proposed by Nobel laureates Hubel and Wiesel was based on their discovery of two types of cells in the primary visual cortex: simple cells and complex cells. ^[15] He later published a 1962 book also introduced variants and computer experiments, including a version with four-layer perceptrons where the last two layers have learned weights (and thus a proper multilayer perceptron). ^{[16] : section 16} Some consider that the 1962 book developed and explored all of the basic ingredients of the deep learning systems of today. ^[17]

Some say that research stagnated following Marvin Minsky and Papert Perceptrons (1969). ^[18]

Group method of data handling, a method to train arbitrarily deep neural networks was published by Alexey Ivakhnenko and Lapa in 1967, which they regarded as a form of polynomial regression, ^[19] or a generalization of Rosenblatt's perceptron. ^[20] A 1971 paper described a deep network with eight layers trained by this method. ^[21]

The first deep learning multilayer perceptron trained by stochastic gradient descent ^[22] was published in 1967 by Shun'ichi Amari. ^[23] In computer experiments conducted by Amari's student Saito, a five layer MLP with two modifiable layers learned internal representations to classify non-linearily separable pattern classes. ^[24] Subsequent developments in hardware and hyperparameter tunings have made end-to-end stochastic gradient descent the currently dominant training technique.

Backpropagation

Main article: Backpropagation

Backpropagation is an efficient application of the chain rule derived by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in 1673 ^[25] to networks of differentiable nodes. The terminology "back-propagating errors" was actually introduced in 1962 by Rosenblatt, ^[16] but he did not know how to implement this, although Henry J. Kelley had a continuous precursor of backpropagation in 1960 in the context of control theory. ^[26] The modern form of backpropagation was developed multiple times in early 1970s. The earliest published instance was Seppo Linnainmaa's master thesis (1970). ^{[27] [28]} Paul Werbos developed it independently in 1971, ^[29] but had difficulty publishing it until 1982. ^[30] In 1986, David E. Rumelhart et al. popularized backpropagation. ^[31]

Recurrent network architectures

Main article: Recurrent neural network

One origin of RNN was statistical mechanics. The Ising model was developed by Wilhelm Lenz ^[32] and Ernst Ising ^[33] in the 1920s ^[34] as a simple statistical mechanical model of magnets at equilibrium. Glauber in 1963 studied the Ising model evolving in time, as a process towards equilibrium (Glauber dynamics), adding in the component of time. ^[35] Shun'ichi Amari in 1972 proposed to modify the weights of an Ising model by Hebbian learning rule as a model of associative memory, adding in the component of learning. ^[36] This was popularized as the Hopfield network (1982). ^[37]

Another origin of RNN was neuroscience. The word "recurrent" is used to describe loop-like structures in anatomy. In 1901, Cajal observed "recurrent semicircles" in the cerebellar cortex. ^[38] In 1933, Lorente de Nó discovered "recurrent, reciprocal connections" by Golgi's method, and proposed that excitatory loops explain certain aspects of the vestibulo-ocular reflex. ^{[39] [40]} Hebb considered "reverberating circuit" as an explanation for short-term memory. ^[41] ( McCulloch & Pitts 1943 ) considered neural networks that contains cycles, and noted that the current activity of such networks can be affected by activity indefinitely far in the past.

Two early influential works were the Jordan network (1986) and the Elman network (1990), which applied RNN to study cognitive psychology. In 1993, a neural history compressor system solved a "Very Deep Learning" task that required more than 1000 subsequent layers in an RNN unfolded in time. ^[42]

LSTM

Sepp Hochreiter's diploma thesis (1991) ^[43] proposed the neural history compressor, and identified and analyzed the vanishing gradient problem. ^{[43] [44]} In 1993, a neural history compressor system solved a "Very Deep Learning" task that required more than 1000 subsequent layers in an RNN unfolded in time. ^{[45] [42]} Hochreiter proposed recurrent residual connections to solve the vanishing gradient problem. This led to the long short-term memory (LSTM), published in 1995. ^[46] LSTM can learn "very deep learning" tasks ^[47] with long credit assignment paths that require memories of events that happened thousands of discrete time steps before. That LSTM was not yet the modern architecture, which required a "forget gate", introduced in 1999, ^[48] which became the standard RNN architecture.

Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks were invented by Hochreiter and Schmidhuber in 1995 and set accuracy records in multiple applications domains. ^{[46] [49]} It became the default choice for RNN architecture.

Around 2006, LSTM started to revolutionize speech recognition, outperforming traditional models in certain speech applications. ^{[50] [51]} LSTM also improved large-vocabulary speech recognition ^{[52] [53]} and text-to-speech synthesis ^[54] and was used in Google voice search, and dictation on Android devices. ^[55]

LSTM broke records for improved machine translation, ^[56] language modeling ^[57] and Multilingual Language Processing. ^[58] LSTM combined with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) improved automatic image captioning. ^[59]

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs)

Main article: Convolutional neural network

The origin of the CNN architecture is the "neocognitron" ^[60] introduced by Kunihiko Fukushima in 1980. ^{[61] [62]} It was inspired by work of Hubel and Wiesel in the 1950s and 1960s which showed that cat visual cortices contain neurons that individually respond to small regions of the visual field. The neocognitron introduced the two basic types of layers in CNNs: convolutional layers, and downsampling layers. A convolutional layer contains units whose receptive fields cover a patch of the previous layer. The weight vector (the set of adaptive parameters) of such a unit is often called a filter. Units can share filters. Downsampling layers contain units whose receptive fields cover patches of previous convolutional layers. Such a unit typically computes the average of the activations of the units in its patch. This downsampling helps to correctly classify objects in visual scenes even when the objects are shifted.

In 1969, Kunihiko Fukushima also introduced the ReLU (rectified linear unit) activation function. ^{[63] [64]} The rectifier has become the most popular activation function for CNNs and deep neural networks in general. ^[65]

The time delay neural network (TDNN) was introduced in 1987 by Alex Waibel and was one of the first CNNs, as it achieved shift invariance. ^[66] It did so by utilizing weight sharing in combination with backpropagation training. ^[67] Thus, while also using a pyramidal structure as in the neocognitron, it performed a global optimization of the weights instead of a local one. ^[66]

In 1988, Wei Zhang et al. applied backpropagation to a CNN (a simplified Neocognitron with convolutional interconnections between the image feature layers and the last fully connected layer) for alphabet recognition. They also proposed an implementation of the CNN with an optical computing system. ^{[68] [69]}

Kunihiko Fukushima published the neocognitron in 1980. ^[70] Max pooling appears in a 1982 publication on the neocognitron. ^[71] In 1989, Yann LeCun et al. trained a CNN with the purpose of recognizing handwritten ZIP codes on mail. While the algorithm worked, training required 3 days. ^{[72] [73]} It used max pooling. Learning was fully automatic, performed better than manual coefficient design, and was suited to a broader range of image recognition problems and image types. Subsequently, Wei Zhang, et al. modified their model by removing the last fully connected layer and applied it for medical image object segmentation in 1991 ^[74] and breast cancer detection in mammograms in 1994. ^[75]

In a variant of the neocognitron called the cresceptron, instead of using Fukushima's spatial averaging, J. Weng et al. also used max-pooling where a downsampling unit computes the maximum of the activations of the units in its patch. ^{[76] [77] [78] [79]}

LeNet-5, a 7-level CNN by Yann LeCun et al. in 1998, ^[80] that classifies digits, was applied by several banks to recognize hand-written numbers on checks (British English : cheques) digitized in 32x32 pixel images. The ability to process higher-resolution images requires larger and more layers of CNNs, so this technique is constrained by the availability of computing resources.

In 2010, Backpropagation training through max-pooling was accelerated by GPUs and shown to perform better than other pooling variants. ^[81] Behnke (2003) relied only on the sign of the gradient (Rprop) ^[82] on problems such as image reconstruction and face localization. Rprop is a first-order optimization algorithm created by Martin Riedmiller and Heinrich Braun in 1992. ^[83]

Deep learning

The deep learning revolution started around CNN- and GPU-based computer vision.

Although CNNs trained by backpropagation had been around for decades and GPU implementations of NNs for years, ^[84] including CNNs, ^[85] faster implementations of CNNs on GPUs were needed to progress on computer vision. Later, as deep learning becomes widespread, specialized hardware and algorithm optimizations were developed specifically for deep learning. ^[86]

A key advance for the deep learning revolution was hardware advances, especially GPU. Some early work dated back to 2004. ^{[84] [85]} In 2009, Raina, Madhavan, and Andrew Ng reported a 100M deep belief network trained on 30 Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 GPUs, an early demonstration of GPU-based deep learning. They reported up to 70 times faster training. ^[87]

In 2011, a CNN named DanNet ^{[88] [89]} by Dan Ciresan, Ueli Meier, Jonathan Masci, Luca Maria Gambardella, and Jürgen Schmidhuber achieved for the first time superhuman performance in a visual pattern recognition contest, outperforming traditional methods by a factor of 3. ^[47] It then won more contests. ^{[90] [91]} They also showed how max-pooling CNNs on GPU improved performance significantly. ^[92]

Many discoveries were empirical and focused on engineering. For example, in 2011, Xavier Glorot, Antoine Bordes and Yoshua Bengio found that the ReLU ^[63] worked better than widely used activation functions prior to 2011.

In October 2012, AlexNet by Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey Hinton ^[93] won the large-scale ImageNet competition by a significant margin over shallow machine learning methods. Further incremental improvements included the VGG-16 network by Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman ^[94] and Google's Inceptionv3. ^[95]

The success in image classification was then extended to the more challenging task of generating descriptions (captions) for images, often as a combination of CNNs and LSTMs. ^{[96] [97] [98]}

In 2014, the state of the art was training “very deep neural network” with 20 to 30 layers. ^[99] Stacking too many layers led to a steep reduction in training accuracy, ^[100] known as the "degradation" problem. ^[101] In 2015, two techniques were developed concurrently to train very deep networks: highway network ^[102] and residual neural network (ResNet). ^[103] The ResNet research team attempted to train deeper ones by empirically testing various tricks for training deeper networks until they discovered the deep residual network architecture. ^[104]

Generative adversarial networks

Main article: Generative adversarial network

In 1991, Juergen Schmidhuber published "artificial curiosity", neural networks in a zero-sum game. ^[105] The first network is a generative model that models a probability distribution over output patterns. The second network learns by gradient descent to predict the reactions of the environment to these patterns. GANs can be regarded as a case where the environmental reaction is 1 or 0 depending on whether the first network's output is in a given set. ^[106] It was extended to "predictability minimization" to create disentangled representations of input patterns. ^{[107] [108]}

Other people had similar ideas but did not develop them similarly. An idea involving adversarial networks was published in a 2010 blog post by Olli Niemitalo. ^[109] This idea was never implemented and did not involve stochasticity in the generator and thus was not a generative model. It is now known as a conditional GAN or cGAN. ^[110] An idea similar to GANs was used to model animal behavior by Li, Gauci and Gross in 2013. ^[111]

Another inspiration for GANs was noise-contrastive estimation, ^[112] which uses the same loss function as GANs and which Goodfellow studied during his PhD in 2010–2014.

Generative adversarial network (GAN) by (Ian Goodfellow et al., 2014) ^[113] became state of the art in generative modeling during 2014-2018 period. Excellent image quality is achieved by Nvidia's StyleGAN (2018) ^[114] based on the Progressive GAN by Tero Karras et al. ^[115] Here the GAN generator is grown from small to large scale in a pyramidal fashion. Image generation by GAN reached popular success, and provoked discussions concerning deepfakes. ^[116] Diffusion models (2015) ^[117] eclipsed GANs in generative modeling since then, with systems such as DALL·E 2 (2022) and Stable Diffusion (2022).

Attention mechanism and Transformer

Main articles: Attention (machine learning) and Transformer (deep learning architecture)

The human selective attention had been studied in neuroscience and cognitive psychology. ^[118] Selective attention of audition was studied in the cocktail party effect (Colin Cherry, 1953). ^[119] (Donald Broadbent, 1958) proposed the filter model of attention. ^[120] Selective attention of vision was studied in the 1960s by George Sperling's partial report paradigm. It was also noticed that saccade control is modulated by cognitive processes, in that the eye moves preferentially towards areas of high salience. As the fovea of the eye is small, the eye cannot sharply resolve all of the visual field at once. The use of saccade control allows the eye to quickly scan important features of a scene. ^[121]

These researches inspired algorithms, such as a variant of the Neocognitron. ^{[122] [123]} Conversely, developments in neural networks had inspired circuit models of biological visual attention. ^{[124] [125]}

A key aspect of attention mechanism is the use of multiplicative operations, which had been studied under the names of higher-order neural networks , ^[126] multiplication units, ^[127] sigma-pi units, ^[128] fast weight controllers, ^[129] and hyper-networks. ^[130]

Recurrent attention

During the deep learning era, attention mechanism was developed solve similar problems in encoding-decoding. ^[131]

The idea of encoder-decoder sequence transduction had been developed in the early 2010s. The papers most commonly cited as the originators that produced seq2seq are two papers from 2014. ^{[132] [133]} A seq2seq architecture employs two RNN, typically LSTM, an "encoder" and a "decoder", for sequence transduction, such as machine translation. They became state of the art in machine translation, and was instrumental in the development of attention mechanism and Transformer.

An image captioning model was proposed in 2015, citing inspiration from the seq2seq model. ^[134] that would encode an input image into a fixed-length vector. (Xu et al. 2015), ^[135] citing (Bahdanau et al. 2014), ^[136] applied the attention mechanism as used in the seq2seq model to image captioning.

Transformer

One problem with seq2seq models was their use of recurrent neural networks, which are not parallelizable as both the encoder and the decoder processes the sequence token-by-token. The decomposable attention attempted to solve this problem by processing the input sequence in parallel, before computing a "soft alignment matrix" ("alignment" is the terminology used by (Bahdanau et al. 2014) ^[136] ). This allowed parallel processing.

The idea of using attention mechanism for self-attention, instead of in an encoder-decoder (cross-attention), was also proposed during this period, such as in differentiable neural computers and neural Turing machines. ^[137] It was termed intra-attention ^[138] where an LSTM is augmented with a memory network as it encodes an input sequence.

These strands of development were combined in the Transformer architecture, published in Attention Is All You Need (2017). Subsequently, attention mechanisms were extended within the framework of Transformer architecture.

Seq2seq models with attention still suffered from the same issue with recurrent networks, which is that they are hard to parallelize, which prevented them to be accelerated on GPUs. In 2016, decomposable attention applied attention mechanism to the feedforward network, which are easy to parallelize. ^[139] One of its authors, Jakob Uszkoreit, suspected that attention without recurrence is sufficient for language translation, thus the title "attention is all you need". ^[140]

In 2017, the original (100M-sized) encoder-decoder transformer model was proposed in the "Attention is all you need" paper. At the time, the focus of the research was on improving seq2seq for machine translation, by removing its recurrence to processes all tokens in parallel, but preserving its dot-product attention mechanism to keep its text processing performance. ^[141] Its parallelizability was an important factor to its widespread use in large neural networks. ^[142]

Unsupervised and self-supervised learning

Self-organizing maps

Main article: Self-organizing map

Self-organizing maps (SOMs) were described by Teuvo Kohonen in 1982. ^{[143] [144]} SOMs are neurophysiologically inspired ^[145] artificial neural networks that learn low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional data while preserving the topological structure of the data. They are trained using competitive learning.

SOMs create internal representations reminiscent of the cortical homunculus, a distorted representation of the human body, based on a neurological "map" of the areas and proportions of the human brain dedicated to processing sensory functions, for different parts of the body.

Boltzmann machines

During 1985–1995, inspired by statistical mechanics, several architectures and methods were developed by Terry Sejnowski, Peter Dayan, Geoffrey Hinton, etc., including the Boltzmann machine, ^[146] restricted Boltzmann machine, ^[147] Helmholtz machine, ^[148] and the wake-sleep algorithm. ^[149] These were designed for unsupervised learning of deep generative models. However, those were more computationally expensive compared to backpropagation. Boltzmann machine learning algorithm, published in 1985, was briefly popular before being eclipsed by the backpropagation algorithm in 1986. (p. 112 ^[150] ).

Geoffrey Hinton et al. (2006) proposed learning a high-level internal representation using successive layers of binary or real-valued latent variables with a restricted Boltzmann machine ^[151] to model each layer. This RBM is a generative stochastic feedforward neural network that can learn a probability distribution over its set of inputs. Once sufficiently many layers have been learned, the deep architecture may be used as a generative model by reproducing the data when sampling down the model (an "ancestral pass") from the top level feature activations. ^{[152] [153]}

Deep learning

In 2012, Andrew Ng and Jeff Dean created an FNN that learned to recognize higher-level concepts, such as cats, only from watching unlabeled images taken from YouTube videos. ^[154]

Other aspects

Knowledge distillation

Knowledge distillation or model distillation is the process of transferring knowledge from a large model to a smaller one. The idea of using the output of one neural network to train another neural network was studied as the teacher-student network configuration. ^[155] In 1992, several papers studied the statistical mechanics of teacher-student network configuration, where both networks are committee machines ^{[156] [157]} or both are parity machines. ^[158]

Another early example of network distillation was also published in 1992, in the field of recurrent neural networks (RNNs). The problem was sequence prediction. It was solved by two RNNs. One of them ("atomizer") predicted the sequence, and another ("chunker") predicted the errors of the atomizer. Simultaneously, the atomizer predicted the internal states of the chunker. After the atomizer manages to predict the chunker's internal states well, it would start fixing the errors, and soon the chunker is obsoleted, leaving just one RNN in the end. ^[159]

A related methodology was model compression or pruning, where a trained network is reduced in size. It was inspired by neurobiological studies showing that the human brain is resistant to damage, and was studied in the 1980s, via methods such as Biased Weight Decay ^[160] and Optimal Brain Damage. ^[161]

Hardware-based designs

The development of metal–oxide–semiconductor (MOS) very-large-scale integration (VLSI), combining millions or billions of MOS transistors onto a single chip in the form of complementary MOS (CMOS) technology, enabled the development of practical artificial neural networks in the 1980s. ^[162]

Computational devices were created in CMOS, for both biophysical simulation and neuromorphic computing inspired by the structure and function of the human brain. Nanodevices ^[163] for very large scale principal components analyses and convolution may create a new class of neural computing because they are fundamentally analog rather than digital (even though the first implementations may use digital devices). ^[164]

Notes

1. Neurons generate an action potential—the release of neurotransmitters that are chemical inputs to other neurons—based on the sum of its incoming chemical inputs.

References

1. Rosenblatt, F. (1958). "The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model For Information Storage And Organization In The Brain". Psychological Review. 65 (6): 386–408. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.588.3775 . doi:10.1037/h0042519. PMID   13602029. S2CID   12781225.
2. Crevier, Daniel (1993). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, NY: BasicBooks. ISBN   0-465-02997-3.
3. Krizhevsky, Alex; Sutskever, Ilya; Hinton, Geoffrey E. (2017-05-24). "ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks" (PDF). Communications of the ACM. 60 (6): 84–90. doi: 10.1145/3065386 . ISSN   0001-0782. S2CID   195908774.
4. Gershgorn, Dave (26 July 2017). "The data that transformed AI research—and possibly the world". Quartz.
5. Vaswani, Ashish; Shazeer, Noam; Parmar, Niki; Uszkoreit, Jakob; Jones, Llion; Gomez, Aidan N; Kaiser, Łukasz; Polosukhin, Illia (2017). "Attention is All you Need" (PDF). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
6. Merriman, Mansfield. A List of Writings Relating to the Method of Least Squares: With Historical and Critical Notes. Vol. 4. Academy, 1877.
7. Stigler, Stephen M. (1981). "Gauss and the Invention of Least Squares". Ann. Stat. 9 (3): 465–474. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176345451 .
8. Bretscher, Otto (1995). Linear Algebra With Applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Stigler, Stephen M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900 . Cambridge: Harvard. ISBN   0-674-40340-1.
10. McCulloch, Warren; Pitts, Walter (1943). "A Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity". Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 5 (4): 115–133. doi:10.1007/BF02478259.
11. Kleene, S. C. (1956-12-31), Shannon, C. E.; McCarthy, J. (eds.), "Representation of Events in Nerve Nets and Finite Automata", Automata Studies. (AM-34), Princeton University Press, pp. 3–42, doi:10.1515/9781400882618-002, ISBN   978-1-4008-8261-8 , retrieved 2024-10-14
12. Hebb, Donald (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley. ISBN   978-1-135-63190-1.
13. Farley, B.G.; W.A. Clark (1954). "Simulation of Self-Organizing Systems by Digital Computer". IRE Transactions on Information Theory. 4 (4): 76–84. doi:10.1109/TIT.1954.1057468.
14. Rochester, N.; J.H. Holland; L.H. Habit; W.L. Duda (1956). "Tests on a cell assembly theory of the action of the brain, using a large digital computer". IRE Transactions on Information Theory. 2 (3): 80–93. doi:10.1109/TIT.1956.1056810.
15. David H. Hubel and Torsten N. Wiesel (2005). Brain and visual perception: the story of a 25-year collaboration. Oxford University Press US. p. 106. ISBN   978-0-19-517618-6.
16. Rosenblatt, Frank (1962). Principles of Neurodynamics. Spartan, New York.
17. Tappert, Charles C. (2019). "Who Is the Father of Deep Learning?". 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). IEEE. pp. 343–348. doi:10.1109/CSCI49370.2019.00067. ISBN   978-1-7281-5584-5. S2CID   216043128 . Retrieved 31 May 2021.
18. Minsky, Marvin; Papert, Seymour (1969). Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. MIT Press. ISBN   978-0-262-63022-1.
19. Ivakhnenko, A. G.; Lapa, V. G. (1967). Cybernetics and Forecasting Techniques. American Elsevier Publishing Co. ISBN   978-0-444-00020-0.
20. Ivakhnenko, A.G. (March 1970). "Heuristic self-organization in problems of engineering cybernetics". Automatica. 6 (2): 207–219. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(70)90092-0.
21. Ivakhnenko, Alexey (1971). "Polynomial theory of complex systems" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. SMC-1 (4): 364–378. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1971.4308320. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-29. Retrieved 2019-11-05.
22. Robbins, H.; Monro, S. (1951). "A Stochastic Approximation Method". The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 22 (3): 400. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729586 .
23. Amari, Shun'ichi (1967). "A theory of adaptive pattern classifier". IEEE Transactions. EC (16): 279–307.
24. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (2022). "Annotated History of Modern AI and Deep Learning". arXiv: 2212.11279 [cs.NE].
25. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von (1920). The Early Mathematical Manuscripts of Leibniz: Translated from the Latin Texts Published by Carl Immanuel Gerhardt with Critical and Historical Notes (Leibniz published the chain rule in a 1676 memoir). Open court publishing Company. ISBN   9780598818461.
26. Kelley, Henry J. (1960). "Gradient theory of optimal flight paths". ARS Journal. 30 (10): 947–954. doi:10.2514/8.5282.
27. Linnainmaa, Seppo (1970). The representation of the cumulative rounding error of an algorithm as a Taylor expansion of the local rounding errors (Masters) (in Finnish). University of Helsinki. p. 6–7.
28. Linnainmaa, Seppo (1976). "Taylor expansion of the accumulated rounding error". BIT Numerical Mathematics. 16 (2): 146–160. doi:10.1007/bf01931367. S2CID   122357351.
29. Anderson, James A.; Rosenfeld, Edward, eds. (2000). Talking Nets: An Oral History of Neural Networks. The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/6626.003.0016. ISBN   978-0-262-26715-1.
30. Werbos, Paul (1982). "Applications of advances in nonlinear sensitivity analysis" (PDF). System modeling and optimization. Springer. pp. 762–770. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 April 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
31. Rumelhart, David E.; Hinton, Geoffrey E.; Williams, Ronald J. (October 1986). "Learning representations by back-propagating errors". Nature. 323 (6088): 533–536. Bibcode:1986Natur.323..533R. doi:10.1038/323533a0. ISSN   1476-4687.
32. Lenz, W. (1920), "Beiträge zum Verständnis der magnetischen Eigenschaften in festen Körpern", Physikalische Zeitschrift, 21: 613–615.
33. Ising, E. (1925), "Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus", Z. Phys., 31 (1): 253–258, Bibcode:1925ZPhy...31..253I, doi:10.1007/BF02980577, S2CID   122157319
34. Brush, Stephen G. (1967). "History of the Lenz-Ising Model". Reviews of Modern Physics. 39 (4): 883–893. Bibcode:1967RvMP...39..883B. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.39.883.
35. Glauber, Roy J. (February 1963). "Roy J. Glauber "Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model"". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 4 (2): 294–307. doi:10.1063/1.1703954 . Retrieved 2021-03-21.
36. Amari, S.-I. (November 1972). "Learning Patterns and Pattern Sequences by Self-Organizing Nets of Threshold Elements". IEEE Transactions on Computers. C-21 (11): 1197–1206. doi:10.1109/T-C.1972.223477. ISSN   0018-9340.
37. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). "Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 79 (8): 2554–2558. Bibcode:1982PNAS...79.2554H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 . PMC   346238 . PMID   6953413.
38. Espinosa-Sanchez, Juan Manuel; Gomez-Marin, Alex; de Castro, Fernando (2023-07-05). "The Importance of Cajal's and Lorente de Nó's Neuroscience to the Birth of Cybernetics". The Neuroscientist. doi:10.1177/10738584231179932. hdl: 10261/348372 . ISSN   1073-8584. PMID   37403768.
39. de NÓ, R. Lorente (1933-08-01). "Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Arc". Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry. 30 (2): 245. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1933.02240140009001. ISSN   0096-6754.
40. Larriva-Sahd, Jorge A. (2014-12-03). "Some predictions of Rafael Lorente de Nó 80 years later". Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 8: 147. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00147 . ISSN   1662-5129. PMC   4253658 . PMID   25520630.
41. "reverberating circuit". Oxford Reference. Retrieved 2024-07-27.
42. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (1993). Habilitation thesis: System modeling and optimization (PDF).^{[ permanent dead link ‍]} Page 150 ff demonstrates credit assignment across the equivalent of 1,200 layers in an unfolded RNN.
43. S. Hochreiter., "Untersuchungen zu dynamischen neuronalen Netzen". Archived 2015-03-06 at the Wayback Machine . Diploma thesis. Institut f. Informatik, Technische Univ. Munich. Advisor: J. Schmidhuber, 1991.
44. Hochreiter, S.; et al. (15 January 2001). "Gradient flow in recurrent nets: the difficulty of learning long-term dependencies". In Kolen, John F.; Kremer, Stefan C. (eds.). A Field Guide to Dynamical Recurrent Networks. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-7803-5369-5.
45. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (1992). "Learning complex, extended sequences using the principle of history compression (based on TR FKI-148, 1991)" (PDF). Neural Computation. 4 (2): 234–242. doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.2.234. S2CID   18271205.^{[ permanent dead link ‍]}
46. Sepp Hochreiter; Jürgen Schmidhuber (21 August 1995), Long Short Term Memory, Wikidata   Q98967430
47. Schmidhuber, J. (2015). "Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview". Neural Networks. 61: 85–117. arXiv: 1404.7828 . doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003. PMID   25462637. S2CID   11715509.
48. Gers, Felix; Schmidhuber, Jürgen; Cummins, Fred (1999). "Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM". 9th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks: ICANN '99. Vol. 1999. pp. 850–855. doi:10.1049/cp:19991218. ISBN   0-85296-721-7.
49. Hochreiter, Sepp; Schmidhuber, Jürgen (1997-11-01). "Long Short-Term Memory". Neural Computation. 9 (8): 1735–1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. PMID   9377276. S2CID   1915014.
50. Graves, Alex; Schmidhuber, Jürgen (2005-07-01). "Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures". Neural Networks. IJCNN 2005. 18 (5): 602–610. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.331.5800 . doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.042. PMID   16112549. S2CID   1856462.
51. Fernández, Santiago; Graves, Alex; Schmidhuber, Jürgen (2007). "An Application of Recurrent Neural Networks to Discriminative Keyword Spotting". Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. ICANN'07. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 220–229. ISBN   978-3-540-74693-5.
52. Sak, Haşim; Senior, Andrew; Beaufays, Françoise (2014). "Long Short-Term Memory recurrent neural network architectures for large scale acoustic modeling" (PDF). Google Research.
53. Li, Xiangang; Wu, Xihong (2014-10-15). "Constructing Long Short-Term Memory based Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition". arXiv: 1410.4281 [cs.CL].
54. Fan, Bo; Wang, Lijuan; Soong, Frank K.; Xie, Lei (2015). "Photo-Real Talking Head with Deep Bidirectional LSTM". Proceedings of ICASSP 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. pp. 4884–8. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178899. ISBN   978-1-4673-6997-8.
55. Sak, Haşim; Senior, Andrew; Rao, Kanishka; Beaufays, Françoise; Schalkwyk, Johan (September 2015). "Google voice search: faster and more accurate".
56. Sutskever, Ilya; Vinyals, Oriol; Le, Quoc V. (2014). "Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks" (PDF). Electronic Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference. 27: 5346. arXiv: 1409.3215 . Bibcode:2014arXiv1409.3215S.
57. Jozefowicz, Rafal; Vinyals, Oriol; Schuster, Mike; Shazeer, Noam; Wu, Yonghui (2016-02-07). "Exploring the Limits of Language Modeling". arXiv: 1602.02410 [cs.CL].
58. Gillick, Dan; Brunk, Cliff; Vinyals, Oriol; Subramanya, Amarnag (2015-11-30). "Multilingual Language Processing From Bytes". arXiv: 1512.00103 [cs.CL].
59. Vinyals, Oriol; Toshev, Alexander; Bengio, Samy; Erhan, Dumitru (2014-11-17). "Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generator". arXiv: 1411.4555 [cs.CV].
60. Fukushima, K. (2007). "Neocognitron". Scholarpedia. 2 (1): 1717. Bibcode:2007SchpJ...2.1717F. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.1717 .
61. Fukushima, Kunihiko (1980). "Neocognitron: A Self-organizing Neural Network Model for a Mechanism of Pattern Recognition Unaffected by Shift in Position" (PDF). Biological Cybernetics. 36 (4): 193–202. doi:10.1007/BF00344251. PMID   7370364. S2CID   206775608 . Retrieved 16 November 2013.
62. LeCun, Yann; Bengio, Yoshua; Hinton, Geoffrey (2015). "Deep learning" (PDF). Nature. 521 (7553): 436–444. Bibcode:2015Natur.521..436L. doi:10.1038/nature14539. PMID   26017442. S2CID   3074096.
63. Fukushima, K. (1969). "Visual feature extraction by a multilayered network of analog threshold elements". IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics. 5 (4): 322–333. doi:10.1109/TSSC.1969.300225.
64. Schmidhuber, Juergen (2022). "Annotated History of Modern AI and Deep Learning". arXiv: 2212.11279 [cs.NE].
65. Ramachandran, Prajit; Barret, Zoph; Quoc, V. Le (October 16, 2017). "Searching for Activation Functions". arXiv: 1710.05941 [cs.NE].
66. Waibel, Alex (December 1987). Phoneme Recognition Using Time-Delay Neural Networks. Meeting of the Institute of Electrical, Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE). Tokyo, Japan.
67. Alexander Waibel et al., Phoneme Recognition Using Time-Delay Neural Networks IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Volume 37, No. 3, pp. 328. – 339 March 1989.
68. Zhang, Wei (1988). "Shift-invariant pattern recognition neural network and its optical architecture". Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Japan Society of Applied Physics.
69. Zhang, Wei (1990). "Parallel distributed processing model with local space-invariant interconnections and its optical architecture". Applied Optics. 29 (32): 4790–7. Bibcode:1990ApOpt..29.4790Z. doi:10.1364/AO.29.004790. PMID   20577468.
70. Fukushima, Kunihiko (1980). "Neocognitron: A Self-organizing Neural Network Model for a Mechanism of Pattern Recognition Unaffected by Shift in Position" (PDF). Biological Cybernetics. 36 (4): 193–202. doi:10.1007/BF00344251. PMID   7370364. S2CID   206775608. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 June 2014. Retrieved 16 November 2013.
71. Fukushima, Kunihiko; Miyake, Sei (1982-01-01). "Neocognitron: A new algorithm for pattern recognition tolerant of deformations and shifts in position". Pattern Recognition. 15 (6): 455–469. Bibcode:1982PatRe..15..455F. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(82)90024-3. ISSN   0031-3203.
72. LeCun et al., "Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition," Neural Computation, 1, pp. 541–551, 1989.
73. LeCun, Yann; Boser, Bernhard; Denker, John; Henderson, Donnie; Howard, R.; Hubbard, Wayne; Jackel, Lawrence (1989). "Handwritten Digit Recognition with a Back-Propagation Network". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2. Morgan-Kaufmann.
74. Zhang, Wei (1991). "Image processing of human corneal endothelium based on a learning network". Applied Optics. 30 (29): 4211–7. Bibcode:1991ApOpt..30.4211Z. doi:10.1364/AO.30.004211. PMID   20706526.
75. Zhang, Wei (1994). "Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network". Medical Physics. 21 (4): 517–24. Bibcode:1994MedPh..21..517Z. doi:10.1118/1.597177. PMID   8058017.
76. J. Weng, N. Ahuja and T. S. Huang, "Cresceptron: a self-organizing neural network which grows adaptively," Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Baltimore, Maryland, vol I, pp. 576–581, June, 1992.
77. J. Weng, N. Ahuja and T. S. Huang, "Learning recognition and segmentation of 3-D objects from 2-D images," Proc. 4th International Conf. Computer Vision, Berlin, Germany, pp. 121–128, May, 1993.
78. J. Weng, N. Ahuja and T. S. Huang, "Learning recognition and segmentation using the Cresceptron," International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 105–139, Nov. 1997.
79. Weng, J; Ahuja, N; Huang, TS (1993). "Learning recognition and segmentation of 3-D objects from 2-D images". 1993 (4th) International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 121–128. doi:10.1109/ICCV.1993.378228. ISBN   0-8186-3870-2. S2CID   8619176.
80. LeCun, Yann; Léon Bottou; Yoshua Bengio; Patrick Haffner (1998). "Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition" (PDF). Proceedings of the IEEE. 86 (11): 2278–2324. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.32.9552 . doi:10.1109/5.726791. S2CID   14542261 . Retrieved October 7, 2016.
81. Dominik Scherer, Andreas C. Müller, and Sven Behnke: "Evaluation of Pooling Operations in Convolutional Architectures for Object Recognition," In 20th International Conference Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN), pp. 92–101, 2010. doi : 10.1007/978-3-642-15825-4_10.
82. Sven Behnke (2003). Hierarchical Neural Networks for Image Interpretation (PDF). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2766. Springer.
83. Martin Riedmiller und Heinrich Braun: Rprop – A Fast Adaptive Learning Algorithm. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer and Information Science VII, 1992
84. Oh, K.-S.; Jung, K. (2004). "GPU implementation of neural networks". Pattern Recognition. 37 (6): 1311–1314. Bibcode:2004PatRe..37.1311O. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2004.01.013.
85. Chellapilla, Kumar; Puri, Sidd; Simard, Patrice (2006), High performance convolutional neural networks for document processing, archived from the original on 2020-05-18, retrieved 2021-02-14
86. Sze, Vivienne; Chen, Yu-Hsin; Yang, Tien-Ju; Emer, Joel (2017). "Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks: A Tutorial and Survey". arXiv: 1703.09039 [cs.CV].
87. Raina, Rajat; Madhavan, Anand; Ng, Andrew Y. (2009-06-14). "Large-scale deep unsupervised learning using graphics processors". Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML '09. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 873–880. doi:10.1145/1553374.1553486. ISBN   978-1-60558-516-1.
88. Cireşan, Dan Claudiu; Meier, Ueli; Gambardella, Luca Maria; Schmidhuber, Jürgen (21 September 2010). "Deep, Big, Simple Neural Nets for Handwritten Digit Recognition". Neural Computation. 22 (12): 3207–3220. arXiv: 1003.0358 . doi:10.1162/neco_a_00052. ISSN   0899-7667. PMID   20858131. S2CID   1918673.
89. Ciresan, D. C.; Meier, U.; Masci, J.; Gambardella, L.M.; Schmidhuber, J. (2011). "Flexible, High Performance Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification" (PDF). International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. doi:10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-210. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-09-29. Retrieved 2017-06-13.
90. Ciresan, Dan; Giusti, Alessandro; Gambardella, Luca M.; Schmidhuber, Jürgen (2012). Pereira, F.; Burges, C. J. C.; Bottou, L.; Weinberger, K. Q. (eds.). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (PDF). Curran Associates, Inc. pp. 2843–2851. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2017-06-13.
91. Ciresan, D.; Giusti, A.; Gambardella, L.M.; Schmidhuber, J. (2013). "Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images with Deep Neural Networks". Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 7908. pp. 411–418. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_51. ISBN   978-3-642-38708-1. PMID   24579167.
92. Ciresan, D.; Meier, U.; Schmidhuber, J. (2012). "Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification". 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3642–3649. arXiv: 1202.2745 . doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248110. ISBN   978-1-4673-1228-8. S2CID   2161592.
93. Krizhevsky, Alex; Sutskever, Ilya; Hinton, Geoffrey (2012). "ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks" (PDF). NIPS 2012: Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, Nevada. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-10. Retrieved 2017-05-24.
94. Simonyan, Karen; Andrew, Zisserman (2014). "Very Deep Convolution Networks for Large Scale Image Recognition". arXiv: 1409.1556 [cs.CV].
95. Szegedy, Christian (2015). "Going deeper with convolutions" (PDF). Cvpr2015. arXiv: 1409.4842 .
96. Vinyals, Oriol; Toshev, Alexander; Bengio, Samy; Erhan, Dumitru (2014). "Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generator". arXiv: 1411.4555 [cs.CV]..
97. Fang, Hao; Gupta, Saurabh; Iandola, Forrest; Srivastava, Rupesh; Deng, Li; Dollár, Piotr; Gao, Jianfeng; He, Xiaodong; Mitchell, Margaret; Platt, John C; Lawrence Zitnick, C; Zweig, Geoffrey (2014). "From Captions to Visual Concepts and Back". arXiv: 1411.4952 [cs.CV]..
98. Kiros, Ryan; Salakhutdinov, Ruslan; Zemel, Richard S (2014). "Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models". arXiv: 1411.2539 [cs.LG]..
99. Simonyan, Karen; Zisserman, Andrew (2015-04-10), Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, arXiv: 1409.1556
100. He, Kaiming; Zhang, Xiangyu; Ren, Shaoqing; Sun, Jian (2016). "Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification". arXiv: 1502.01852 [cs.CV].
101. He, Kaiming; Zhang, Xiangyu; Ren, Shaoqing; Sun, Jian (10 Dec 2015). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv: 1512.03385 .
102. Srivastava, Rupesh Kumar; Greff, Klaus; Schmidhuber, Jürgen (2 May 2015). "Highway Networks". arXiv: 1505.00387 [cs.LG].
103. He, Kaiming; Zhang, Xiangyu; Ren, Shaoqing; Sun, Jian (2016). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE. pp. 770–778. arXiv: 1512.03385 . doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90. ISBN   978-1-4673-8851-1.
104. Linn, Allison (2015-12-10). "Microsoft researchers win ImageNet computer vision challenge". The AI Blog. Retrieved 2024-06-29.
105. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (1991). "A possibility for implementing curiosity and boredom in model-building neural controllers". Proc. SAB'1991. MIT Press/Bradford Books. pp. 222–227.
106. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (2020). "Generative Adversarial Networks are Special Cases of Artificial Curiosity (1990) and also Closely Related to Predictability Minimization (1991)". Neural Networks. 127: 58–66. arXiv: 1906.04493 . doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.04.008. PMID   32334341. S2CID   216056336.
107. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (November 1992). "Learning Factorial Codes by Predictability Minimization". Neural Computation. 4 (6): 863–879. doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.6.863. S2CID   42023620.
108. Schmidhuber, Jürgen; Eldracher, Martin; Foltin, Bernhard (1996). "Semilinear predictability minimzation produces well-known feature detectors". Neural Computation. 8 (4): 773–786. doi:10.1162/neco.1996.8.4.773. S2CID   16154391.
109. Niemitalo, Olli (February 24, 2010). "A method for training artificial neural networks to generate missing data within a variable context". Internet Archive (Wayback Machine). Archived from the original on March 12, 2012. Retrieved February 22, 2019.
110. "GANs were invented in 2010?". reddit r/MachineLearning. 2019. Retrieved 2019-05-28.
111. Li, Wei; Gauci, Melvin; Gross, Roderich (July 6, 2013). "Proceeding of the fifteenth annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation conference - GECCO '13". Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO 2013). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: ACM. pp. 223–230. doi:10.1145/2463372.2465801. ISBN   9781450319638.
112. Gutmann, Michael; Hyvärinen, Aapo. "Noise-Contrastive Estimation" (PDF). International Conference on AI and Statistics.
113. Goodfellow, Ian; Pouget-Abadie, Jean; Mirza, Mehdi; Xu, Bing; Warde-Farley, David; Ozair, Sherjil; Courville, Aaron; Bengio, Yoshua (2014). Generative Adversarial Networks (PDF). Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2014). pp. 2672–2680. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 November 2019. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
114. "GAN 2.0: NVIDIA's Hyperrealistic Face Generator". SyncedReview.com. December 14, 2018. Retrieved October 3, 2019.
115. Karras, T.; Aila, T.; Laine, S.; Lehtinen, J. (26 February 2018). "Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation". arXiv: 1710.10196 [cs.NE].
116. "Prepare, Don't Panic: Synthetic Media and Deepfakes". witness.org. Archived from the original on 2 December 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
117. Sohl-Dickstein, Jascha; Weiss, Eric; Maheswaranathan, Niru; Ganguli, Surya (2015-06-01). "Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics" (PDF). Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. 37. PMLR: 2256–2265. arXiv: 1503.03585 .
118. Kramer, Arthur F.; Wiegmann, Douglas A.; Kirlik, Alex (2006-12-28). "1 Attention: From History to Application". Attention: From Theory to Practice. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305722.003.0001. ISBN   978-0-19-530572-2.
119. Cherry EC (1953). "Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears" (PDF). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 25 (5): 975–79. Bibcode:1953ASAJ...25..975C. doi:10.1121/1.1907229. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-002A-F750-3 . ISSN   0001-4966.
120. Broadbent, D (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
121. Kowler, Eileen; Anderson, Eric; Dosher, Barbara; Blaser, Erik (1995-07-01). "The role of attention in the programming of saccades". Vision Research. 35 (13): 1897–1916. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-U. ISSN   0042-6989. PMID   7660596.
122. Fukushima, Kunihiko (1987-12-01). "Neural network model for selective attention in visual pattern recognition and associative recall". Applied Optics. 26 (23): 4985–4992. Bibcode:1987ApOpt..26.4985F. doi:10.1364/AO.26.004985. ISSN   0003-6935. PMID   20523477.
123. Ba, Jimmy; Mnih, Volodymyr; Kavukcuoglu, Koray (2015-04-23). "Multiple Object Recognition with Visual Attention". arXiv: 1412.7755 [cs.LG].
124. Koch, Christof; Ullman, Shimon (1987), Vaina, Lucia M. (ed.), "Shifts in Selective Visual Attention: Towards the Underlying Neural Circuitry", Matters of Intelligence: Conceptual Structures in Cognitive Neuroscience, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 115–141, doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3833-5_5, ISBN   978-94-009-3833-5 , retrieved 2024-08-06
125. Soydaner, Derya (August 2022). "Attention mechanism in neural networks: where it comes and where it goes". Neural Computing and Applications. 34 (16): 13371–13385. doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07366-3. ISSN   0941-0643.
126. Giles, C. Lee; Maxwell, Tom (1987-12-01). "Learning, invariance, and generalization in high-order neural networks". Applied Optics. 26 (23): 4972–4978. doi:10.1364/AO.26.004972. ISSN   0003-6935. PMID   20523475.
127. Feldman, J. A.; Ballard, D. H. (1982-07-01). "Connectionist models and their properties". Cognitive Science. 6 (3): 205–254. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80001-3. ISSN   0364-0213.
128. Rumelhart, David E.; Mcclelland, James L.; Group, PDP Research (1987-07-29). Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 1: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations, Chapter 2 (PDF). Cambridge, Mass: Bradford Books. ISBN   978-0-262-68053-0.{{cite book}}: |last3= has generic name (help)
129. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (January 1992). "Learning to Control Fast-Weight Memories: An Alternative to Dynamic Recurrent Networks". Neural Computation. 4 (1): 131–139. doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.131. ISSN   0899-7667.
130. Ha, David; Dai, Andrew; Le, Quoc V. (2016-12-01). "HyperNetworks". arXiv: 1609.09106 [cs.LG].
131. Niu, Zhaoyang; Zhong, Guoqiang; Yu, Hui (2021-09-10). "A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning". Neurocomputing. 452: 48–62. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091. ISSN   0925-2312.
132. Cho, Kyunghyun; van Merrienboer, Bart; Gulcehre, Caglar; Bahdanau, Dzmitry; Bougares, Fethi; Schwenk, Holger; Bengio, Yoshua (2014-06-03). "Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation". arXiv: 1406.1078 .{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
133. Sutskever, Ilya; Vinyals, Oriol; Le, Quoc Viet (14 Dec 2014). "Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks". arXiv: 1409.3215 [cs.CL].
134. Vinyals, Oriol; Toshev, Alexander; Bengio, Samy; Erhan, Dumitru (2015). "Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generator": 3156–3164. arXiv: 1411.4555 .{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
135. Xu, Kelvin; Ba, Jimmy; Kiros, Ryan; Cho, Kyunghyun; Courville, Aaron; Salakhudinov, Ruslan; Zemel, Rich; Bengio, Yoshua (2015-06-01). "Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention". Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR: 2048–2057. arXiv: 1502.03044 .
136. Bahdanau, Dzmitry; Cho, Kyunghyun; Bengio, Yoshua (2016-05-19). "Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate". arXiv: 1409.0473 [cs.CL].
137. Graves, Alex; Wayne, Greg; Danihelka, Ivo (2014-12-10). "Neural Turing Machines". arXiv: 1410.5401 [cs.NE].
138. Cheng, Jianpeng; Dong, Li; Lapata, Mirella (2016-09-20). "Long Short-Term Memory-Networks for Machine Reading". arXiv: 1601.06733 [cs.CL].
139. Parikh, Ankur P.; Täckström, Oscar; Das, Dipanjan; Uszkoreit, Jakob (2016-09-25). "A Decomposable Attention Model for Natural Language Inference". arXiv: 1606.01933 [cs.CL].
140. Levy, Steven. "8 Google Employees Invented Modern AI. Here's the Inside Story". Wired. ISSN   1059-1028. Archived from the original on 20 March 2024. Retrieved 2024-08-06.
141. Vaswani, Ashish; Shazeer, Noam; Parmar, Niki; Uszkoreit, Jakob; Jones, Llion; Gomez, Aidan N; Kaiser, Łukasz; Polosukhin, Illia (2017). "Attention is All you Need" (PDF). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
142. Peng, Bo; Alcaide, Eric; Anthony, Quentin; Albalak, Alon; Arcadinho, Samuel; Biderman, Stella; Cao, Huanqi; Cheng, Xin; Chung, Michael (2023-12-10). "RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Era". arXiv: 2305.13048 [cs.CL].
143. Kohonen, Teuvo; Honkela, Timo (2007). "Kohonen Network". Scholarpedia. 2 (1): 1568. Bibcode:2007SchpJ...2.1568K. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.1568 .
144. Kohonen, Teuvo (1982). "Self-Organized Formation of Topologically Correct Feature Maps". Biological Cybernetics. 43 (1): 59–69. doi:10.1007/bf00337288. S2CID   206775459.
145. Von der Malsburg, C (1973). "Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex". Kybernetik. 14 (2): 85–100. doi:10.1007/bf00288907. PMID   4786750. S2CID   3351573.
146. Ackley, David H.; Hinton, Geoffrey E.; Sejnowski, Terrence J. (1985-01-01). "A learning algorithm for boltzmann machines". Cognitive Science. 9 (1): 147–169. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(85)80012-4. ISSN   0364-0213.
147. Smolensky, Paul (1986). "Chapter 6: Information Processing in Dynamical Systems: Foundations of Harmony Theory" (PDF). In Rumelhart, David E.; McLelland, James L. (eds.). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 1: Foundations. MIT Press. pp.  194–281. ISBN   0-262-68053-X.
148. Peter, Dayan; Hinton, Geoffrey E.; Neal, Radford M.; Zemel, Richard S. (1995). "The Helmholtz machine". Neural Computation. 7 (5): 889–904. doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.889. hdl: 21.11116/0000-0002-D6D3-E . PMID   7584891. S2CID   1890561.
149. Hinton, Geoffrey E.; Dayan, Peter; Frey, Brendan J.; Neal, Radford (1995-05-26). "The wake-sleep algorithm for unsupervised neural networks". Science. 268 (5214): 1158–1161. Bibcode:1995Sci...268.1158H. doi:10.1126/science.7761831. PMID   7761831. S2CID   871473.
150. Sejnowski, Terrence J. (2018). The deep learning revolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. ISBN   978-0-262-03803-4.
151. Smolensky, P. (1986). "Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory.". In D. E. Rumelhart; J. L. McClelland; PDP Research Group (eds.). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 1. MIT Press. pp.  194–281. ISBN   9780262680530.
152. Hinton, G. E.; Osindero, S.; Teh, Y. (2006). "A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets" (PDF). Neural Computation . 18 (7): 1527–1554. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.76.1541 . doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527. PMID   16764513. S2CID   2309950.
153. Hinton, Geoffrey (2009-05-31). "Deep belief networks". Scholarpedia. 4 (5): 5947. Bibcode:2009SchpJ...4.5947H. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.5947 . ISSN   1941-6016.
154. Ng, Andrew; Dean, Jeff (2012). "Building High-level Features Using Large Scale Unsupervised Learning". arXiv: 1112.6209 [cs.LG].
155. Watkin, Timothy L. H.; Rau, Albrecht; Biehl, Michael (1993-04-01). "The statistical mechanics of learning a rule". Reviews of Modern Physics. 65 (2): 499–556. Bibcode:1993RvMP...65..499W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.499.
156. Schwarze, H; Hertz, J (1992-10-15). "Generalization in a Large Committee Machine". Europhysics Letters (EPL). 20 (4): 375–380. Bibcode:1992EL.....20..375S. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/20/4/015. ISSN   0295-5075.
157. Mato, G; Parga, N (1992-10-07). "Generalization properties of multilayered neural networks". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 25 (19): 5047–5054. Bibcode:1992JPhA...25.5047M. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/25/19/017. ISSN   0305-4470.
158. Hansel, D; Mato, G; Meunier, C (1992-11-01). "Memorization Without Generalization in a Multilayered Neural Network". Europhysics Letters (EPL). 20 (5): 471–476. Bibcode:1992EL.....20..471H. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/20/5/015. ISSN   0295-5075.
159. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (1992). "Learning complex, extended sequences using the principle of history compression" (PDF). Neural Computation. 4 (2): 234–242. doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.2.234. S2CID   18271205.^{[ permanent dead link ‍]}
160. Hanson, Stephen; Pratt, Lorien (1988). "Comparing Biases for Minimal Network Construction with Back-Propagation". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1. Morgan-Kaufmann.
161. LeCun, Yann; Denker, John; Solla, Sara (1989). "Optimal Brain Damage". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2. Morgan-Kaufmann.
162. Mead, Carver A.; Ismail, Mohammed (8 May 1989). Analog VLSI Implementation of Neural Systems (PDF). The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Vol. 80. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1639-8. ISBN   978-1-4613-1639-8.
163. Yang, J. J.; Pickett, M. D.; Li, X. M.; Ohlberg, D. A. A.; Stewart, D. R.; Williams, R. S. (2008). "Memristive switching mechanism for metal/oxide/metal nanodevices". Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 (7): 429–433. Bibcode:2008NatNa...3..429Y. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.160. PMID   18654568.
164. Strukov, D. B.; Snider, G. S.; Stewart, D. R.; Williams, R. S. (2008). "The missing memristor found". Nature. 453 (7191): 80–83. Bibcode:2008Natur.453...80S. doi:10.1038/nature06932. PMID   18451858. S2CID   4367148.

External links

• "Lecun 2019-7-11 ACM Tech Talk". Google Docs. Retrieved 2020-02-13.