In three-dimensional space, a stellation extends facets of a polyhedron to form a new figure. Usually, this is achieved by extending faces or edges and planes of a polyhedron, until they generate new vertices that bound a newly formed figure.
This article mainly lists various stellations belonging to uniform polyhedra, such as those of the regular Platonic solids and the semiregular Archimidean solids. It also lists stellations featuring unbounded vertices.
Experimentation with star polygons and star polyhedra since the fourteenth century AD led the way to formal theories for stellating polyhedra:
It was in 1619 that the first mathematical description of a stellation was given, by Johannes Kepler in his landmark book, Harmonices Mundi : the process of extending the edges (or faces) of a figure until new vertices are formed, which collectively form a new figure. [11] [12] [b] Using this method, Kepler was able to discover the small stellated dodecahedron and the great stellated dodecahedron [13] [14] [15] (the latter, a solid Jamnitzer previously studied). [8] In 1809, Louis Poinsot rediscovered Kepler's figures by putting together star pentagons around each vertex. He also assembled convex polygons around star vertices, leading him to discover two more regular stars, the great icosahedron and great dodecahedron. [16] Three years later, Augustin-Louis Cauchy proved, using concepts of symmetry, that these four stellations are the only regular star-polyhedra, [17] [18] eventually termed the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra.
Coxeter et al. (1938) details, for the first time, all stellations of the regular icosahedron with specific rules proposed by J. C. P. Miller. [19] Generalizing these (Miller's rules) for stellating any uniform polyhedron yields the following: [20]
These rules are ideal for stellating smaller uniform solids, such as the regular polyhedra; however, when assessing stellations of other larger uniform polyhedra, this method can quickly become overwhelming. (For example, there are a total of 358,833,072 stellations to the rhombic triacontahedron using this set of rules.) [21] To address this, Pawley (1973) proposed a set of rules that restrict the number of stellations to a more manageable set of fully supported stellations that are radially convex, [22] [23] such that an outward ray from the center of the original polyhedron (in any direction) crosses the stellation surface only once [24] (that is to say, all visible parts of a face are seen from the same side). [c]
H. S. M. Coxeter was the first to describe the stellation process as the reciprocal action to faceting , in his 1948 first edition of Regular Polytopes . [26] He further specifies the construction of a star polyhedron as a stellation of its core (with congruent face-planes), or by faceting its case — the former requires the addition of solid pieces that generate new vertices, while the latter involves the removal of solid pieces, without forming any new vertices. [27] [d]
Lists for polyhedral stellations contain non-convex polyhedra; some of the most notable examples include: [e]
Examples of stellations that topologically do not fit into standard definitions of uniform polyhedra are listed further down (i.e. stellations of hemipolyhedra). [29]
Image | Name | Stellation core | Refs. | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Great dodecahedron | Regular dodecahedron | W21 | *, ¶ |
![]() | Great stellated dodecahedron | W22 | ||
![]() | Small stellated dodecahedron | W20 | * | |
![]() | Great icosahedron | Regular icosahedron | W41,C7 | |
![]() | Stellated octahedron | Regular octahedron | W19 | †, ‡, ¶ |
![]() | Compound of five tetrahedra | Regular icosahedron | W24,C47 | † |
![]() | Compound of five octahedra | W2,C3 | ||
![]() | Compound of ten tetrahedra | W25,C22 | ||
![]() | Compound of five cubes | Rhombic triacontahedron | ||
![]() | Compound of great dodecahedron and small stellated dodecahedron | ‡ | ||
![]() | Compound of dodecahedron and icosahedron | Icosidodecahedron | W47 | |
![]() | Compound of great icosahedron and great stellated dodecahedron | W61 | ||
![]() | Compound of cube and octahedron | Cuboctahedron | W43 | |
![]() | Small triambic icosahedron | Regular icosahedron | W1,C2 | ¶ |
![]() | Final stellation of the icosahedron | W13,C8 | ||
![]() | First stellation of the rhombic dodecahedron | Rhombic dodecahedron |
* Kepler-Poinsot polyhedron
† Regular compound polyhedron
‡ Compound of Platonic or Kepler-Poinsot dual polyhedra
¶ First and/or outermost stellation
"Refs." (references) such as indexes found in Coxeter et al. (1999) using the Crennells' illustration notation (C), and Wenninger (1989) (W).
"Stellation core" describes a stellated regular (Platonic), semi-regular (Archimedean), or dual to a semi-regular (Catalan) figure.
The stella octangula (or stellated octahedron), is the only stellation of the regular octahedron. [34] This stellation is made of self-dual tetrahedra, as the simplest regular polyhedral compound: [35]
Figure | Stellation |
---|---|
Stellated octahedron stella octangula | |
Different from the larger, regular self-dual polyhedral enantiomorphisms (such as in the compound of five cubes), the tetrahedron is the only Platonic solid to generate a stellation (and regular polyhedron compound) from a single intersecting copy of itself. [f] Like the cube, the regular tetrahedron does not generate stellations when extending its faces, since all are adjacent (this yields only one possible convex hull). [34]
Coxeter et al. (1938) details stellations of the regular icosahedron with (aformentioned) rules proposed by J. C. P. Miller. The following table lists all such stellations per the Crennells' indexing, as found in Coxeter et al. (1999). In this list, [g] the regular icosahedron (or snub octahedron) stellation core is indexed as "1" (press "show" to open the table):
Stellations of the regular icosahedron | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crennell | Cells | Faces | Figure | Face diagram | ||
1 | A | 0 | ![]() | |||
2 | B | 1 | ![]() | |||
3 | C | 2 | ![]() | |||
4 | D | 3 4 | ![]() | |||
5 | E | 5 6 7 | ![]() | |||
6 | F | 8 9 10 | ![]() | |||
7 | G | 11 12 | ![]() | |||
8 | H | 13 | ![]() | |||
9 | e1 | 3' 5 | ![]() | |||
10 | f1 | 5' 6' 9 10 | ![]() | |||
11 | g1 | 10' 12 | ![]() | |||
12 | e1f1 | 3' 6' 9 10 | ![]() | |||
13 | e1f1g1 | 3' 6' 9 12 | ![]() | |||
14 | f1g1 | 5' 6' 9 12 | ![]() | |||
15 | e2 | 4' 6 7 | ![]() | |||
16 | f2 | 7' 8 | ![]() | |||
17 | g2 | 8' 9'11 | ![]() | |||
18 | e2f2 | 4' 6 8 | ![]() | |||
19 | e2f2g2 | 4' 6 9' 11 | ![]() | |||
20 | f2g2 | 7' 9' 11 | ![]() | |||
21 | De1 | 4 5 | ![]() | |||
22 | Ef1 | 7 9 10 | ![]() | |||
23 | Fg1 | 8 9 12 | ![]() | |||
24 | De1f1 | 4 6' 9 10 | ![]() | |||
25 | De1f1g1 | 4 6' 9 12 | ![]() | |||
26 | Ef1g1 | 7 9 12 | ![]() | |||
27 | De2 | 3 6 7 | ![]() | |||
28 | Ef2 | 5 6 8 | ![]() | |||
29 | Fg2 | 10 11 | ![]() | |||
30 | De2f2 | 3 6 8 | ![]() | |||
31 | De2f2g2 | 3 6 9' 11 | ![]() | |||
32 | Ef2g2 | 5 6 9' 11 | ![]() | |||
33 | f1 | 5' 6' 9 10 | ![]() | |||
34 | e1f1 | 3' 5 6' 9 10 | ![]() | |||
35 | De1f1 | 4 5 6' 9 10 | ![]() | |||
36 | f1g1 | 5' 6' 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
37 | e1f1g1 | 3' 5 6' 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
38 | De1f1g1 | 4 5 6' 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
39 | f1g2 | 5' 6'8'9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
40 | e1f1g2 | 3' 5 6'8'9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
41 | De1f1g2 | 4 5 6'8'9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
42 | f1f2g2 | 5' 6'7'9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
43 | e1f1f2g2 | 3' 5 6'7'9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
44 | De1f1f2g2 | 4 5 6'7'9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
45 | e2f1 | 4'5' 6 7 9 10 | ![]() | |||
46 | De2f1 | 35' 6 7 9 10 | ![]() | |||
47 | Ef1 | 5 6 7 9 10 | ![]() | |||
48 | e2f1g1 | 4'5' 6 7 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
49 | De2f1g1 | 35' 6 7 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
50 | Ef1g1 | 5 6 7 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
51 | e2f1f2 | 4'5' 6 8 9 10 | ![]() | |||
52 | De2f1f2 | 35' 6 8 9 10 | ![]() | |||
53 | Ef1f2 | 5 6 8 9 10 | ![]() | |||
54 | e2f1f2g1 | 4'5' 6 8 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
55 | De2f1f2g1 | 35' 6 8 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
56 | Ef1f2g1 | 5 6 8 9 10'12 | ![]() | |||
57 | e2f1f2g2 | 4'5' 6 9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
58 | De2f1f2g2 | 35' 6 9' 10 11 | ![]() | |||
59 | Ef1f2g2 | 5 6 9' 10 11 | ![]() |
Wenninger (1989) includes a subset of these as formal stellations, primarily based on illustrative methods of construction of stellated polyhedral models (and extending to stellations of the icosidodecahedron). [36] While only one stellation of the icosahedron is a Kepler-Poinsot polyhedron, all stellations of the dodecahedron are Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra (the remaining).
The table below is adapted from research by Robert Webb, using his program Stella. [37] It enumerates fully supported stellations and stellations per Miller's process, of the regular Platonic solids as well as the semi-regular Archimedean solids and their Catalan duals. [h] In this list, the elongated square gyrobicupola and its dual polyhedron are not included (these are sometimes considered a fourteenth Archimedean and Catalan solid, respectively). The base polyhedron stellation core is included as a zeroth convex stellation (following the Crennells' indexing), with stellation totals the sum of chiral and reflexible stellations. [i]
"Cell types" are sets of symmetrically equivalent stellation cells, where "stellation cells" are the minimal 3D spaces enclosed on all sides by the original polyhedron's extended facial planes.
"?" denotes an unknown total number of stellations; however, the number of reflexible stellations are sometimes known for these (where chiral stellations are excluded).
In Wenninger (1983), a unique family of stellations with unbounded vertices are identified. [29] These originate from orthogonal edges of faces that pass through centers of their corresponding dual hemipolyhedra. The following is a list of these stellations; specifically, of non-convex, uniform hemipolyhedra (with coincidental figures in parentheses).
Image | Name | Stellation core |
---|---|---|
![]() | Tetrahemihexacron | Tetrahemihexahedron |
![]() | Hexahemioctacron (octahemioctacron) | Octahemioctahedron |
![]() | Small dodecahemidodecacron (small icosihemidodecacron) | Small icosihemidodecahedron |
![]() | Great icosihemidodecacron (great dodecahemidodecacron) | Great dodecahemidodecahedron |
![]() | Small dodecahemicosacron (great dodecahemicosacron) | Great dodecahemicosahedron |
This family of stellations does not strictly fulfill the definition of a polyhedron that is bound by vertices, and Wenninger notes that at the limit their facets can be interpreted as forming unbounded elongated pyramids, or equivalently, prisms (indistinguishably). [45] Of these, only the tetrahemihexahedron would produce a stellation without another coincidental figure, the tetrahemihexacron.
{{cite book}}
: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)