Sprouts of capitalism

As China's feudal society had developed a commodity economy, and so carried within itself the seeds of capitalism, China would of herself have developed slowly into a capitalist society even without the impact of foreign capitalism.

— The Chinese Revolution and the Chinese Communist Party ^[2]

Similar ideas had been explored by Chinese Marxists in the 1920s and 1930s, and provided a way of reconciling Chinese history with Karl Marx's five stages of modes of production: primitive, slavery, feudal, capitalist and socialist. ^{[3] [4]}

Shang Yue and other Chinese historians sought to justify Mao's hypothesis in the 1950s, producing a series of papers collected in two volumes entitled Essays on the debate on the sprouts of capitalism in China published in 1957 and 1960. ^{[1] [5]} They identified a number of developments in the Chinese economy between the 16th and 18th centuries, including improved farming and handicraft technologies, improvement and expansion of markets, and changes in wage labor relationships. These developments were compared to earlier changes in European economies, and held to constitute a new proto-capitalist phase of Chinese economic history. ^{[6] [7]} Some versions of the theory held that indigenous development of industrial capitalism was forestalled by the 17th-century Manchu invasion or 19th-century conflicts with European powers such as the Opium War, ^[8] while others believed that the sprouts were always weak and had withered by the 19th century. ^[9]

Later history of the idea

These ideas were also explored by Japanese historians of China in the 1950s, though they concluded that a decisive transformation was unlikely. In 1980 the late-Ming historian Mori Masao said this work "failed to produce satisfactory theoretical results, though it uncovered a wealth of historical facts which had hitherto been unknown". ^[10] Western economic historians have tended to dismiss the suggestion that these developments presaged a capitalist transformation. ^{[5] [11]}

In China, Shang Yue and the "sprouts" theories were denounced in the Anti-rightist Movement and Cultural Revolution for their emphasis on capitalism, and for contradicting Mao's emphasis on Chinese reaction to Western imperialism in the 19th century. ^{[12] [13]} The fall of the Gang of Four in 1976 and the resurgence of the Chinese economy in the 1980s led to renewed Chinese interest in these ideas. ^{[14] [15]} A notable contribution was the 3-volume A History of the Development of Capitalism in China, by Wu Chengming and colleagues in 1985, with the second volume dealing with the sprouts of capitalism. ^{[16] [17]} There have been few publications in the area since the early 1990s. ^[18] Wu Chengming himself abandoned the idea in the late 1990s. ^[19] Many Chinese historians now accept that the "sprouts" did not amount to a decisive new phase of economic development. ^[9]

Economists such as Philip Huang and Li Bozhong have attacked "sprouts" research and other approaches measuring Chinese economic history against developments in Western Europe. They challenge the underlying assumption of a single path of development reflected by the European experience, and argue that focusing on similarities with Europe distorts the study of Chinese history. ^{[20] [21] [22]}

Parallels identified in the sprouts literature

Workers in the porcelain and silk industries (early 18th century)

The sprouts researchers tended to identify the expansion of markets with capitalism. ^[23] In an influential study in 1957, Fu Yiling placed the origin of the sprouts in a 16th-century "commercial revolution". ^[24] Chinese exports to the West generated an inflow of silver from the Americas which expanded the money supply, driving the monetization of markets and taxation. ^{[25] [23]} The following centuries saw increased regional specialization and the integration of rural markets. ^[23]

Researchers have pointed to the rise of wage labour in late Ming and early Qing workshops in textile, paper and other industries. ^{[26] [27]} However, they lacked the production accounting methods found in European factories, achieving large-scale production by using many small workshops, each with a small team of workers under a master craftsman. ^[28]

The organization of silk weaving in 18th-century Chinese cities was compared with the putting-out system used in European textile industries between the 13th and 18th centuries. As the interregional silk trade grew, merchant houses began to organize manufacture to guarantee their supplies, providing silk to households for weaving as piece work. ^[29] In contrast to Europe, where putting-out aimed to harness rural labour to bypass the urban guild system, the Chinese system was a mechanism of spreading risk. In addition, although putting-out began much earlier in continental Europe, it was only in the English cotton industry that it led to industrialization. ^[30]

Korean historiography

Korean nationalist historians advanced a "sprouts" theory as a counter to the claim that Korean industrialization was the "offspring" of Japanese industrialization. ^[31] According to this theory, farmers responded to the 17th-century labour shortage caused by foreign invasions by adopting more efficient farming methods, leading to greater commercialization and proto-industrialization, which was curtailed by the Japanese interference from the late 19th century. ^[32] It became the orthodox theory in school textbooks in both North and South Korea. ^[33] However, since the 1980s South Korean historians have largely discredited the theory. ^[34]

Books

• Zhōngguó zīběn zhǔyì méngyá wèntí tǎolùn jí中國資本主义萌芽問題討論集[Essays on the debate on the sprouts of capitalism in China], Beijing: People's University of China, 1957.
• Zhōngguó zīběn zhǔyì méngyá wèntí tǎolùn jí: xù biān中國資本主义萌芽問題討論集 : 續編[Essays on the debate on the sprouts of capitalism in China, continued], Beijing: People's University of China, 1960.
• Xu, Dixin; Wu, Chengming (1985), Zhōngguó zīběn zhǔyì de méngyá中国资本主义的萌芽[Sprouts of Capitalism in China], Zhōngguó zīběn zhǔyì fāzhǎn shǐ 《中国资本主义发展史》 [A History of the Development of Capitalism in China], vol. 2, Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.
• Xu, Dixin; Wu, Chengming; Curwen, Peter (translator) (2000), Chinese capitalism, 1522–1840, Macmillan, ISBN   978-0-312-21729-7 {{citation}}: |given3= has generic name (help), revised and abridged translation of the three volumes of Xu & Wu (1985).

See also

• Asiatic mode of production
• Economic history of China before 1912
• Great Divergence
• Proto-industrialization

References

1. Feuerwerker (1961), p. 327.
2. Conners (2009), p. 117.
3. Feuerwerker (1961), pp. 327–328.
4. Dirlik (1982), p. 106.
5. Brook (2002), p. 150.
6. Myers & Wang (2002), pp. 643–644.
7. Faure (2006), pp. 16–17.
8. Pomeranz (2000), p. 206.
9. Myers & Wang (2002), p. 644.
10. Brook (2002), pp. 151–152.
11. Pomeranz (2000), p. 217.
12. Feuerwerker (1961), p. 329.
13. Dirlik (1982), p. 111.
14. Dirlik (1982), pp. 105–106.
15. Brook (2002), pp. 152–153.
16. Kwan (1998), pp. 54–55.
17. Faure (2006), p. 102.
18. Zhong (2003).
19. Li (2008), p. 60, n. 22.
20. Huang (1991), pp. 313–314.
21. Li (1998), pp. 161–163.
22. Ma (2004), p. 261.
23. Von Glahn (1996), p. 2.
24. Von Glahn (1996), p. 261.
25. Myers & Wang (2002), pp. 589–590.
26. Faure (2006), p. 17.
27. Rowe (2002), p. 526.
28. Faure (2006), p. 18.
29. Li (1981), pp. 50–52.
30. Li (1981), pp. 57–61.
31. Eckert (1996), p. 2.
32. Cha (2004), pp. 279–280.
33. Cha (2004), p. 278.
34. Cha (2004), pp. 278, 288–289.

Works cited

• Brook, Timothy (2002), "Capitalism and the writing of modern history in China", in Brook, Timothy; Blue, Gregory (eds.), China and Historical Capitalism: Genealogies of Sinological Knowledge, Studies in Modern Capitalism, Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–157, ISBN   978-0-521-52591-6.
• Cha, Myung Soo (2004), "Facts and Myths about Korea's Economic Past" (PDF), Australian Economic History Review, 44 (3): 278–293, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8446.2004.00122.x .
• Conners, Shawn, ed. (2009), Collected Writings of Chairman Mao – Politics and Tactics, Special Edition Books, ISBN   978-1-934255-25-4.
• Dirlik, Arif (1982), "Chinese Historians and the Marxist Concept of Capitalism: A Critical Examination", Modern China, 8 (1): 105–132, doi:10.1177/009770048200800103, JSTOR   188834, S2CID   143571079.
• Eckert, Carter J. (1996), Offspring of empire: the Koch'ang Kims and the colonial origins of Korean capitalism, 1876–1945, Korean studies of the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington Press, ISBN   978-0-295-97533-7.
• Faure, David (2006), China and capitalism: a history of business enterprise in modern China, Understanding China: New Viewpoints on History And Culture, Hong Kong University Press, ISBN   978-962-209-784-1.
• Feuerwerker, Albert (1961), "China's History in Marxian Dress", The American Historical Review, 66 (2): 323–353, doi:10.2307/1844030, JSTOR   1844030.
• Huang, Philip C. C. (1991), "The Paradigmatic Crisis in Chinese Studies: Paradoxes in Social and Economic History", Modern China, 17 (3): 299–341, doi:10.1177/009770049101700301, JSTOR   189244, S2CID   143999125.
• Kwan, Man Bun (1998), "Chinese Business History in the People's Republic of China", in Gardella, Robert; Leonard, Jane Kate; McElderry, Andrea Lee (eds.), Chinese Business History: Interpretive Trends and Priorities for the Future, M.E. Sharpe, pp. 35–64, ISBN   978-0-7656-0346-3.
• Li, Bozhong (1998), Agricultural Development in Jiangnan, 1620–1850, New York: St. Martin's Press, ISBN   978-0-312-17529-0.
• ——— (2008), "Retrospect and Prospect: The Rise of Economic History in China", The Chinese Historical Review, 15 (1): 50–64, doi:10.1179/tcr.2008.15.1.50, S2CID   144240946.
• Li, Lillian M. (1981), China's silk trade: traditional industry in the modern world, 1842–1937, Harvard East Asian monographs, vol. 97, Harvard Univ Asia Center, ISBN   978-0-674-11962-8.
• Ma, Debin (2004), "Growth, institutions and knowledge: a review and reflection on the historiography of 18th–20th century China", Australian Economic History Review, 44 (3): 259–277, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8446.2004.00121.x.
• Myers, H. Ramon; Wang, Yeh-Chien (2002), "Economic developments, 1644–1800", in Peterson, Willard (ed.), The Ch'ing Empire to 1800, The Cambridge History of China, vol. 9, Cambridge University Press, pp. 563–647, ISBN   978-0-521-24334-6.
• Pomeranz, Kenneth (2000), The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton University Press, ISBN   978-0-691-09010-8.
• Rowe, William T. (2002), "Social stability and social change", in Peterson, Willard (ed.), The Ch'ing Empire to 1800, The Cambridge History of China, vol. 9, Cambridge University Press, pp. 473–562, ISBN   978-0-521-24334-6.
• Von Glahn, Richard (1996), Fountain of fortune: money and monetary policy in China, 1000–1700, University of California Press, ISBN   978-0-520-20408-9.
• Zhong, Weimin (2003), "Zīběnzhǔyì méngyá wèntí yánjiū de xuéshù shǐ huígù yǔ fǎnsī" 资本主义萌芽问题研究的学术史回顾与反思 [Review and Reflection on the Academic History of the Research on the Germination of Capitalism], Xuéshù jiè学术界[Academia] (4): 223–240.

Sprouts of capitalism
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese	資本主義萌芽
Simplified Chinese	资本主义萌芽
Transcriptions Standard Mandarin Hanyu Pinyin zīběnzhǔyì méngyá

v t e Historiography
Historians list Historical method History historians historicity history theories of history
Historical sources	Types Primary sources Secondary sources Tertiary sources Sources Annals Archives Artifacts Archaeological site Chronicles Codices Deeds Facsimiles Features Hieroglyphs Historical documents Logbooks Manuscripts Oral tradition Papyri Religious texts Scrolls War diaries Service records
Fields of study	By scale Big History World history Human history Local history Microhistory By source Archival science  / Library and information science (template) Books  / Writing systems Chorography Chronology Diplomatics Encyclopaedistics Epigraphy Genealogy Heraldry Numismatics (Money) Onomastics Oral history preservation Phaleristics Philology Postage stamps Prosopography Sigillography Toponymy Vexillology By topic Anthropology  / Paleoanthropology Cultural Ecology  / Environment  / Geography Economic Business Capitalism Thought Intellectual Linguistics Medieval churches Military Political Constitutional Diplomatic Social Feminism Gender Indigenous Labour LGBT Rural Urban Women
Methodology	Case study Periodization Historical eras Tarikh Three-age system Approaches, schools Annales school History of mentalities Nouvelle histoire Historiometry  / Cliometrics Critical Feminist Great Man theory for inventions and discoveries Historical anthropology Historical determinism Historism Historical-critical method Humanistic Leninist Marxist Historical materialism Nationalist Nationalization of history People's history Subaltern Studies Pop history Quantitative history Revisionist Whig
Concepts	General Change and continuity Historic preservation Historic recurrence Historical significance Historicity Specific Black legend Coloniality and decolonization of knowledge Dark Ages Historical negationism Historian's fallacy  / Presentism Invented tradition Late Bronze Age collapse Sea Peoples Modernisation theory Paradigm shift Pax list Thirty-year rule Translatio imperii  / Translatio studii Vaticinium ex eventu Periodization of modern history Age of Discovery Age of Enlightenment European Civil War  / Second Thirty Years' War Long 18th  / 19th century Renaissance Continuity thesis
By country or region	Africa Ethiopia Rwanda Double genocide theory Americas Canada Residential schools Indigenous population history Latin America Argentina May Revolution  / Causes Colonial Spanish America Casta United States African-American history Nadir of American race relations Reconstruction era Consensus history Frontier thesis Political history Eras Progressive-era historians Eurasia Albania Balhae Bulgaria France French Revolution  / Causes Grand Siècle Georgia Aryan Kartli Hellenic Ages of Man India Iran 2,500-year celebration of the Persian Empire Iranian Revolution causes Ireland Great Famine "More Irish than the Irish themselves" Revolutionary period Italy Risorgimento Japan Korea Nationalist North Macedonia Philippines Early settlements Poland Partitions Serbia Soviet Union October Revolution Switzerland Turkey Kemalist Ottoman Empire Vietnam Nam tiến Trưng sisters Ancient Rome Catilinarian conspiracy Christianization Constantinian shift Expansion Fall of Western Rome Succession Byzantine succession Moscow, third Rome Ottoman claim Problem of two emperors China Archaeology Century of humiliation Conquest dynasty Golden ages Hua–Yi distinction Four Barbarians Self-Strengthening Movement Sprouts of capitalism Germany Alltagsgeschichte Borussian myth Historikerstreit Sonderweg Strukturgeschichte  [ de ] Vergangenheitsbewältigung Spain Black legend  / White legend Carlism in the Francoist era Convivencia Inquisition Reconquista United Kingdom British Empire Porter–MacKenzie debate Second colonial occupation Poor Laws Scotland Origins of the Kingdom of Alba Westminster Stone Storm over the gentry Suffragette Campaign Tudor myth Ricardians Winter of Discontent Oceania Colonial Australia
By war, conflict	1948 Arab–Israeli War Palestinian expulsion and flight Algerian War American Civil War Origins Burning of Smyrna Cold War Crusades Islamic views Eighty Years' War Origins Fall of Babylon Franco-Prussian War Causes Paris Commune Gallic Wars Great Game Indian Rebellion of 1857 Causes Napoleonic Wars Invasion of Russia Waterloo Paraguayan War Peloponnesian War Polish–Soviet War Causes Syrian revolution War in the Vendée War of 1812 Origins World War I Causes Fischer thesis Color books Late Ottoman genocides Armenian genocide Persian famine of 1917–1919 Schlieffen Plan Treaty of Versailles Reparations War guilt question Article 231 Reichstag inquiry World War II Causes "Blitzkrieg" concept Broad vs. narrow front German resistance to Nazism Nazi foreign policy debate Eastern Front Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact Soviet offensive plans Soviets and the Warsaw Uprising Volhynia massacres The Holocaust Auschwitz bombing debate Awareness in Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe Functionalism–intentionalism debate Pius Wars "Polish death camp" Responsibility Slovakia Uniqueness Pacific War Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki "Battle for Australia" Bengal famine Second Sino- Japanese War Nanjing Massacre Western Front Battle of France Guilty Men Résistancialisme
By person	Political leaders Adolf Hitler Alexander the Great Amin al-Husseini Aurangzeb Constantine the Great Horatio Nelson Hypatia José de San Martín Juan Manuel de Rosas Klemens von Metternich Leonid Brezhnev Louis Riel Muammar Gaddafi Napoleon Neville Chamberlain Pedro II of Brazil Thomas Jefferson Ulysses S. Grant Warren G. Harding Historical rankings Australia Canada Modern Germany Netherlands United Kingdom United States Others The Beatles Charles Darwin Friedrich Nietzsche H. P. Lovecraft Jane Austen Jesus J. R. R. Tolkien Madonna Robert Falcon Scott Socrates Søren Kierkegaard William Shakespeare
Other topics	Bears in antiquity Economics Great Recession Great Depression Feudalism Gunpowder and gun transmission Library of Alexandria The Lord of the Rings Nationalism in the Middle Ages Professionalization and institutionalization of history Religion Avestan geography Early Christianity Background Early Islam Salons Science Conflict thesis The Simpsons Western European colonialism and colonization
Organizations, institutes	Heritage registers Historical society list History institutes University of Tokyo
Related	Commemorative plaque Documentary film Hagiography Historical fiction Historical realism Historical geographic information system
Category Multimedia