Capacitance

Last updated

Common symbols C farad μF, nF, pF F = A2 s4 kg−1 m−2 C = charge / voltage M−1L−2T4I2

Capacitance is the capability of a material object or device to store electric charge. It is measured by the change in charge in response to a difference in electric potential, expressed as the ratio of those quantities. Commonly recognized are two closely related notions of capacitance: self capacitance and mutual capacitance. [1] :237–238 An object that can be electrically charged exhibits self capacitance, for which the electric potential is measured between the object and ground. Mutual capacitance is measured between two components, and is particularly important in the operation of the capacitor, an elementary linear electronic component designed to add capacitance to an electric circuit.

Contents

The capacitance between two conductors is a function only of the geometry; the opposing surface area of the conductors and the distance between them, and the permittivity of any dielectric material between them. For many dielectric materials, the permittivity, and thus the capacitance, is independent of the potential difference between the conductors and the total charge on them.

The SI unit of capacitance is the farad (symbol: F), named after the English physicist Michael Faraday. A 1 farad capacitor, when charged with 1 coulomb of electrical charge, has a potential difference of 1 volt between its plates. [2] The reciprocal of capacitance is called elastance.

Self capacitance

In discussing electrical circuits, the term capacitance is usually a shorthand for the mutual capacitance between two adjacent conductors, such as the two plates of a capacitor. However, every isolated conductor also exhibits capacitance, here called self capacitance. It is measured by the amount of electric charge that must be added to an isolated conductor to raise its electric potential by one unit of measurement, e.g., one volt. [3] The reference point for this potential is a theoretical hollow conducting sphere, of infinite radius, with the conductor centered inside this sphere.

Self capacitance of a conductor is defined by the ratio of charge and electric potential:

${\displaystyle C={\frac {q}{V}},}$

where

• ${\textstyle q}$ is the charge held,
• ${\textstyle V={\frac {1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}}\int {\frac {\sigma }{r}}\,dS}$ is the electric potential,
• ${\textstyle \sigma }$ is the surface charge density,
• ${\textstyle dS}$ is an infinitesimal element of area on the surface of the conductor,
• ${\textstyle r}$ is the length from ${\textstyle dS}$ to a fixed point M on the conductor,
• ${\displaystyle \varepsilon _{0}}$ is the vacuum permittivity.

Using this method, the self capacitance of a conducting sphere of radius ${\textstyle R}$ is: [4]

${\displaystyle C=4\pi \varepsilon _{0}R}$

Example values of self capacitance are:

The inter-winding capacitance of a coil is sometimes called self capacitance, [6] but this is a different phenomenon. It is actually mutual capacitance between the individual turns of the coil and is a form of stray or parasitic capacitance. This self capacitance is an important consideration at high frequencies: it changes the impedance of the coil and gives rise to parallel resonance. In many applications this is an undesirable effect and sets an upper frequency limit for the correct operation of the circuit.[ citation needed ]

Mutual capacitance

A common form is a parallel-plate capacitor, which consists of two conductive plates insulated from each other, usually sandwiching a dielectric material. In a parallel plate capacitor, capacitance is very nearly proportional to the surface area of the conductor plates and inversely proportional to the separation distance between the plates.

If the charges on the plates are ${\textstyle +q}$ and ${\textstyle -q}$, and ${\textstyle V}$ gives the voltage between the plates, then the capacitance ${\textstyle C}$ is given by

${\displaystyle C={\frac {q}{V}},}$

which gives the voltage/current relationship

${\displaystyle i(t)=C{\frac {\mathrm {d} v(t)}{\mathrm {d} t}},}$

where ${\textstyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} v(t)}{\mathrm {d} t}}}$ is the instantaneous rate of change of voltage.

The energy stored in a capacitor is found by integrating the work ${\textstyle W}$:

${\displaystyle W_{\text{charging}}={\frac {1}{2}}CV^{2}}$

Capacitance matrix

The discussion above is limited to the case of two conducting plates, although of arbitrary size and shape. The definition ${\displaystyle C=Q/V}$ does not apply when there are more than two charged plates, or when the net charge on the two plates is non-zero. To handle this case, Maxwell introduced his coefficients of potential . If three (nearly ideal) conductors are given charges ${\displaystyle Q_{1},Q_{2},Q_{3}}$, then the voltage at conductor 1 is given by

${\displaystyle V_{1}=P_{11}Q_{1}+P_{12}Q_{2}+P_{13}Q_{3},}$

and similarly for the other voltages. Hermann von Helmholtz and Sir William Thomson showed that the coefficients of potential are symmetric, so that ${\displaystyle P_{12}=P_{21}}$, etc. Thus the system can be described by a collection of coefficients known as the elastance matrix or reciprocal capacitance matrix, which is defined as:

${\displaystyle P_{ij}={\frac {\partial V_{i}}{\partial Q_{j}}}}$

From this, the mutual capacitance ${\displaystyle C_{m}}$ between two objects can be defined [7] by solving for the total charge ${\textstyle Q}$ and using ${\displaystyle C_{m}=Q/V}$.

${\displaystyle C_{m}={\frac {1}{(P_{11}+P_{22})-(P_{12}+P_{21})}}}$

Since no actual device holds perfectly equal and opposite charges on each of the two "plates", it is the mutual capacitance that is reported on capacitors.

The collection of coefficients ${\displaystyle C_{ij}={\frac {\partial Q_{i}}{\partial V_{j}}}}$ is known as the capacitance matrix, [8] [9] [10] and is the inverse of the elastance matrix.

Capacitors

The capacitance of the majority of capacitors used in electronic circuits is generally several orders of magnitude smaller than the farad. The most common subunits of capacitance in use today are the microfarad (µF), nanofarad (nF), picofarad (pF), and, in microcircuits, femtofarad (fF). However, specially made supercapacitors can be much larger (as much as hundreds of farads), and parasitic capacitive elements can be less than a femtofarad. In the past, alternate subunits were used in old historical texts; "mf" and "mfd" for microfarad (µF); "mmf", "mmfd", "pfd", "µµF" for picofarad (pF); but are now considered obsolete. [11] [12]

Capacitance can be calculated if the geometry of the conductors and the dielectric properties of the insulator between the conductors are known. A qualitative explanation for this can be given as follows. Once a positive charge is put unto a conductor, this charge creates an electrical field, repelling any other positive charge to be moved onto the conductor; i.e., increasing the necessary voltage. But if nearby there is another conductor with a negative charge on it, the electrical field of the positive conductor repelling the second positive charge is weakened (the second positive charge also feels the attracting force of the negative charge). So due to the second conductor with a negative charge, it becomes easier to put a positive charge on the already positive charged first conductor, and vice versa; i.e., the necessary voltage is lowered.

As a quantitative example consider the capacitance of a capacitor constructed of two parallel plates both of area ${\textstyle A}$ separated by a distance ${\textstyle d}$. If ${\textstyle d}$ is sufficiently small with respect to the smallest chord of ${\textstyle A}$, there holds, to a high level of accuracy:

${\displaystyle \ C=\varepsilon {\frac {A}{d}}}$

note that

${\displaystyle \varepsilon =\varepsilon _{0}\varepsilon _{r}}$

where

• ${\textstyle C}$ is the capacitance, in farads;
• ${\textstyle A}$ is the area of overlap of the two plates, in square meters;
• ${\textstyle \varepsilon _{0}}$ is the electric constant (${\textstyle \varepsilon _{0}\sim 8.854\times 10^{-12}F.m^{-1}}$);
• ${\textstyle \varepsilon _{r}}$ is the relative permittivity (also dielectric constant) of the material in between the plates (${\textstyle \varepsilon _{r}=1}$ for air); and
• ${\textstyle d}$ is the separation between the plates, in meters.

Capacitance is proportional to the area of overlap and inversely proportional to the separation between conducting sheets. The closer the sheets are to each other, the greater the capacitance. The equation is a good approximation if d is small compared to the other dimensions of the plates so that the electric field in the capacitor area is uniform, and the so-called fringing field around the periphery provides only a small contribution to the capacitance.

Combining the equation for capacitance with the above equation for the energy stored in a capacitance, for a flat-plate capacitor the energy stored is:

${\displaystyle W_{\text{stored}}={\frac {1}{2}}CV^{2}={\frac {1}{2}}\varepsilon {\frac {A}{d}}V^{2}.}$

where ${\textstyle W}$ is the energy, in joules; ${\textstyle C}$ is the capacitance, in farads; and ${\textstyle V}$ is the voltage, in volts.

Stray capacitance

Any two adjacent conductors can function as a capacitor, though the capacitance is small unless the conductors are close together for long distances or over a large area. This (often unwanted) capacitance is called parasitic or stray capacitance. Stray capacitance can allow signals to leak between otherwise isolated circuits (an effect called crosstalk), and it can be a limiting factor for proper functioning of circuits at high frequency.

Stray capacitance between the input and output in amplifier circuits can be troublesome because it can form a path for feedback, which can cause instability and parasitic oscillation in the amplifier. It is often convenient for analytical purposes to replace this capacitance with a combination of one input-to-ground capacitance and one output-to-ground capacitance; the original configuration – including the input-to-output capacitance – is often referred to as a pi-configuration. Miller's theorem can be used to effect this replacement: it states that, if the gain ratio of two nodes is 1/K, then an impedance of Z connecting the two nodes can be replaced with a Z/1  K impedance between the first node and ground and a KZ/K  1 impedance between the second node and ground. Since impedance varies inversely with capacitance, the internode capacitance, C, is replaced by a capacitance of KC from input to ground and a capacitance of (K  1)C/K from output to ground. When the input-to-output gain is very large, the equivalent input-to-ground impedance is very small while the output-to-ground impedance is essentially equal to the original (input-to-output) impedance.

Capacitance of conductors with simple shapes

Calculating the capacitance of a system amounts to solving the Laplace equation ${\textstyle \nabla ^{2}\varphi =0}$ with a constant potential ${\textstyle \varphi }$ on the 2-dimensional surface of the conductors embedded in 3-space. This is simplified by symmetries. There is no solution in terms of elementary functions in more complicated cases.

For plane situations, analytic functions may be used to map different geometries to each other. See also Schwarz–Christoffel mapping.

Capacitance of simple systems
TypeCapacitanceComment
Parallel-plate capacitor${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}={\frac {\ \varepsilon A\ }{d}}\ }$
• ${\textstyle \varepsilon }$: Permittivity
Concentric cylinders${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}={\frac {2\pi \varepsilon \ell }{\ \ln \left(R_{2}/R_{1}\right)\ }}\ }$
• ${\textstyle \varepsilon }$: Permittivity
Eccentric cylinders [13] ${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}={\frac {2\pi \varepsilon \ell }{\ \operatorname {arcosh} \left({\frac {R_{1}^{2}+R_{2}^{2}-d^{2}}{2R_{1}R_{2}}}\right)\ }}\ }$
• ${\textstyle \varepsilon }$: Permittivity
• ${\textstyle R_{1}}$: Outer radius
• ${\textstyle R_{2}}$: Inner radius
• ${\textstyle d}$: Distance between center
• ${\textstyle \ell }$: Wire length
Pair of parallel wires [14] ${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}={\frac {\pi \varepsilon \ell }{\ \operatorname {arcosh} \left({\frac {d}{2a}}\right)\ }}={\frac {\pi \varepsilon \ell }{\ \ln \left({\frac {d}{\ 2a\ }}+{\sqrt {{\frac {d^{2}}{\ 4a^{2}\ }}-1\ }}\right)\ }}\ }$
Wire parallel to wall [14] ${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}={\frac {2\pi \varepsilon \ell }{\ \operatorname {arcosh} \left({\frac {d}{a}}\right)\ }}={\frac {2\pi \varepsilon \ell }{\ \ln \left({\frac {\ d\ }{a}}+{\sqrt {{\frac {\ d^{2}\ }{a^{2}}}-1\ }}\right)\ }}\ }$
• ${\textstyle a}$: Wire radius
• ${\textstyle d}$: Distance, ${\textstyle d>a}$
• ${\textstyle \ell }$: Wire length
Two parallel
coplanar strips [15]
${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}=\varepsilon \ell \ {\frac {\ K\left({\sqrt {1-k^{2}\ }}\right)\ }{K\left(k\right)}}\ }$
• ${\textstyle d}$: Distance
• ${\textstyle \ell }$: Length
• ${\textstyle w_{1},w_{2}}$: Strip width
• ${\textstyle \ k_{1}=\left({\tfrac {\ 2w_{1}\ }{d}}+1\right)^{-1}\ }$
${\displaystyle \ k_{2}=\left({\tfrac {\ 2w_{2}\ }{d}}+1\right)^{-1}\ }$${\displaystyle \ k={\sqrt {k_{1}\ k_{2}\ }}\ }$
• ${\textstyle K}$: Complete elliptic integral of the first kind
Concentric spheres${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}={\frac {4\pi \varepsilon }{\ {\frac {1}{R_{1}}}-{\frac {1}{R_{2}}}\ }}\ }$
• ${\textstyle \varepsilon }$: Permittivity
Two spheres,
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\ {\mathcal {C}}\ =&\ {}2\pi \varepsilon a\ \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\sinh \left(\ln \left(D+{\sqrt {D^{2}-1}}\right)\right)}{\sinh \left(n\ln \left(D+{\sqrt {D^{2}-1}}\right)\right)}}\\={}&{}2\pi \varepsilon a\left[1+{\frac {1}{2D}}+{\frac {1}{4D^{2}}}+{\frac {1}{8D^{3}}}+{\frac {1}{8D^{4}}}+{\frac {3}{32D^{5}}}+{\mathcal {O}}\left({\frac {1}{D^{6}}}\right)\right]\\={}&{}2\pi \varepsilon a\left[\ln 2+\gamma -{\frac {1}{2}}\ln \left(2D-2\right)+{\mathcal {O}}\left(2D-2\right)\right]\\={}&{}2\pi \varepsilon a\,{\frac {\sqrt {D^{2}-1}}{\log(q)}}\left[\psi _{q}\left(1+{\frac {i\pi }{\log(q)}}\right)-i\pi -\psi _{q}(1)\right]\end{aligned}}\ }
• ${\textstyle a}$: Radius
• ${\textstyle d}$: Distance, ${\textstyle d>2a}$
• ${\textstyle D=d/2a,D>1}$
• ${\textstyle \gamma }$: Euler's constant
• ${\displaystyle q=D+{\sqrt {D^{2}-1}}}$
• ${\displaystyle \psi _{q}(z)={\frac {\partial _{z}\Gamma _{q}(z)}{\Gamma _{q}(z)}}}$: the q-digamma function
• ${\displaystyle \Gamma _{q}(z)}$: the q-Gamma function [18]

Sphere in front of wall [16] ${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}=4\pi \varepsilon a\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\sinh \left(\ln \left(D+{\sqrt {D^{2}-1}}\right)\right)}{\sinh \left(n\ln \left(D+{\sqrt {D^{2}-1}}\right)\right)}}\ }$
• ${\displaystyle \ a\ }$: Radius
• ${\displaystyle \ d\ }$: Distance, ${\displaystyle d>a}$
• ${\displaystyle D=d/a}$
Sphere${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}=4\pi \varepsilon a\ }$
• ${\displaystyle a}$: Radius
Circular disc [19] ${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}=8\varepsilon a\ }$
• ${\displaystyle a}$: Radius
Thin straight wire,
finite length [20] [21] [22]
${\displaystyle \ {\mathcal {C}}={\frac {2\pi \varepsilon \ell }{\Lambda }}\left[1+{\frac {1}{\Lambda }}\left(1-\ln 2\right)+{\frac {1}{\Lambda ^{2}}}\left(1+\left(1-\ln 2\right)^{2}-{\frac {\pi ^{2}}{12}}\right)+{\mathcal {O}}\left({\frac {1}{\Lambda ^{3}}}\right)\right]\ }$
• ${\displaystyle a}$: Wire radius
• ${\displaystyle \ell }$: Length
• ${\displaystyle \ \Lambda =\ln \left(\ell /a\right)\ }$

Energy storage

The energy (measured in joules) stored in a capacitor is equal to the work required to push the charges into the capacitor, i.e. to charge it. Consider a capacitor of capacitance C, holding a charge +q on one plate and −q on the other. Moving a small element of charge dq from one plate to the other against the potential difference V = q/C requires the work dW:

${\displaystyle \mathrm {d} W={\frac {q}{C}}\,\mathrm {d} q}$

where W is the work measured in joules, q is the charge measured in coulombs and C is the capacitance, measured in farads.

The energy stored in a capacitor is found by integrating this equation. Starting with an uncharged capacitance (q = 0) and moving charge from one plate to the other until the plates have charge +Q and −Q requires the work W:

${\displaystyle W_{\text{charging}}=\int _{0}^{Q}{\frac {q}{C}}\,\mathrm {d} q={\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {Q^{2}}{C}}={\frac {1}{2}}QV={\frac {1}{2}}CV^{2}=W_{\text{stored}}.}$

Nanoscale systems

The capacitance of nanoscale dielectric capacitors such as quantum dots may differ from conventional formulations of larger capacitors. In particular, the electrostatic potential difference experienced by electrons in conventional capacitors is spatially well-defined and fixed by the shape and size of metallic electrodes in addition to the statistically large number of electrons present in conventional capacitors. In nanoscale capacitors, however, the electrostatic potentials experienced by electrons are determined by the number and locations of all electrons that contribute to the electronic properties of the device. In such devices, the number of electrons may be very small, so the resulting spatial distribution of equipotential surfaces within the device is exceedingly complex.

Single-electron devices

The capacitance of a connected, or "closed", single-electron device is twice the capacitance of an unconnected, or "open", single-electron device. [23] This fact may be traced more fundamentally to the energy stored in the single-electron device whose "direct polarization" interaction energy may be equally divided into the interaction of the electron with the polarized charge on the device itself due to the presence of the electron and the amount of potential energy required to form the polarized charge on the device (the interaction of charges in the device's dielectric material with the potential due to the electron). [24]

Few-electron devices

The derivation of a "quantum capacitance" of a few-electron device involves the thermodynamic chemical potential of an N-particle system given by

${\displaystyle \mu (N)=U(N)-U(N-1)}$

whose energy terms may be obtained as solutions of the Schrödinger equation. The definition of capacitance,

${\displaystyle {1 \over C}\equiv {\Delta V \over \Delta Q},}$

with the potential difference

${\displaystyle \Delta V={\Delta \mu \, \over e}={\mu (N+\Delta N)-\mu (N) \over e}}$

may be applied to the device with the addition or removal of individual electrons,

${\displaystyle \Delta N=1}$

and

${\displaystyle \Delta Q=e.}$

The "quantum capacitance" of the device is then [25]

${\displaystyle C_{Q}(N)={\frac {e^{2}}{\mu (N+1)-\mu (N)}}={\frac {e^{2}}{E(N)}}.}$

This expression of "quantum capacitance" may be written as

${\displaystyle C_{Q}(N)={e^{2} \over U(N)}}$

which differs from the conventional expression described in the introduction where ${\displaystyle W_{\text{stored}}=U}$, the stored electrostatic potential energy,

${\displaystyle C={Q^{2} \over 2U}}$

by a factor of 1/2 with ${\displaystyle Q=Ne}$.

However, within the framework of purely classical electrostatic interactions, the appearance of the factor of 1/2 is the result of integration in the conventional formulation involving the work done when charging a capacitor,

${\displaystyle W_{\text{charging}}=U=\int _{0}^{Q}{\frac {q}{C}}\,\mathrm {d} q}$

which is appropriate since ${\displaystyle \mathrm {d} q=0}$ for systems involving either many electrons or metallic electrodes, but in few-electron systems, ${\displaystyle \mathrm {d} q\to \Delta \,Q=e}$. The integral generally becomes a summation. One may trivially combine the expressions of capacitance

${\displaystyle Q=CV}$

and electrostatic interaction energy,

${\displaystyle U=QV,}$

to obtain

${\displaystyle C=Q{1 \over V}=Q{Q \over U}={Q^{2} \over U}}$

which is similar to the quantum capacitance. A more rigorous derivation is reported in the literature. [26] In particular, to circumvent the mathematical challenges of spatially complex equipotential surfaces within the device, an average electrostatic potential experienced by each electron is utilized in the derivation.

Apparent mathematical differences may be understood more fundamentally. The potential energy, ${\displaystyle U(N)}$, of an isolated device (self-capacitance) is twice that stored in a "connected" device in the lower limit N=1. As N grows large, ${\displaystyle U(N)\to U}$. [24] Thus, the general expression of capacitance is

${\displaystyle C(N)={(Ne)^{2} \over U(N)}.}$

In nanoscale devices such as quantum dots, the "capacitor" is often an isolated or partially isolated component within the device. The primary differences between nanoscale capacitors and macroscopic (conventional) capacitors are the number of excess electrons (charge carriers, or electrons, that contribute to the device's electronic behavior) and the shape and size of metallic electrodes. In nanoscale devices, nanowires consisting of metal atoms typically do not exhibit the same conductive properties as their macroscopic, or bulk material, counterparts.

Capacitance in electronic and semiconductor devices

In electronic and semiconductor devices, transient or frequency-dependent current between terminals contains both conduction and displacement components. Conduction current is related to moving charge carriers (electrons, holes, ions, etc.), while displacement current is caused by a time-varying electric field. Carrier transport is affected by electric fields and by a number of physical phenomena - such as carrier drift and diffusion, trapping, injection, contact-related effects, impact ionization, etc. As a result, device admittance is frequency-dependent, and a simple electrostatic formula for capacitance ${\displaystyle C=q/V,}$ is not applicable. A more general definition of capacitance, encompassing electrostatic formula, is: [27]

${\displaystyle C={\frac {\operatorname {Im} (Y(\omega ))}{\omega }},}$

where ${\displaystyle Y(\omega )}$ is the device admittance, and ${\displaystyle \omega }$ is the angular frequency.

In general, capacitance is a function of frequency. At high frequencies, capacitance approaches a constant value, equal to "geometric" capacitance, determined by the terminals' geometry and dielectric content in the device. A paper by Steven Laux [27] presents a review of numerical techniques for capacitance calculation. In particular, capacitance can be calculated by a Fourier transform of a transient current in response to a step-like voltage excitation:

${\displaystyle C(\omega )={\frac {1}{\Delta V}}\int _{0}^{\infty }[i(t)-i(\infty )]\cos(\omega t)dt.}$

Negative capacitance in semiconductor devices

Usually, capacitance in semiconductor devices is positive. However, in some devices and under certain conditions (temperature, applied voltages, frequency, etc.), capacitance can become negative. Non-monotonic behavior of the transient current in response to a step-like excitation has been proposed as the mechanism of negative capacitance. [28] Negative capacitance has been demonstrated and explored in many different types of semiconductor devices. [29]

Measuring capacitance

A capacitance meter is a piece of electronic test equipment used to measure capacitance, mainly of discrete capacitors. For most purposes and in most cases the capacitor must be disconnected from circuit.

Many DVMs (digital volt meters) have a capacitance-measuring function. These usually operate by charging and discharging the capacitor under test with a known current and measuring the rate of rise of the resulting voltage; the slower the rate of rise, the larger the capacitance. DVMs can usually measure capacitance from nanofarads to a few hundred microfarads, but wider ranges are not unusual. It is also possible to measure capacitance by passing a known high-frequency alternating current through the device under test and measuring the resulting voltage across it (does not work for polarised capacitors).

More sophisticated instruments use other techniques such as inserting the capacitor-under-test into a bridge circuit. By varying the values of the other legs in the bridge (so as to bring the bridge into balance), the value of the unknown capacitor is determined. This method of indirect use of measuring capacitance ensures greater precision. Through the use of Kelvin connections and other careful design techniques, these instruments can usually measure capacitors over a range from picofarads to farads.

Related Research Articles

In electromagnetism, a dielectric is an electrical insulator that can be polarised by an applied electric field. When a dielectric material is placed in an electric field, electric charges do not flow through the material as they do in an electrical conductor, because they have no loosely bound, or free, electrons that may drift through the material, but instead they shift, only slightly, from their average equilibrium positions, causing dielectric polarisation. Because of dielectric polarisation, positive charges are displaced in the direction of the field and negative charges shift in the direction opposite to the field. This creates an internal electric field that reduces the overall field within the dielectric itself. If a dielectric is composed of weakly bonded molecules, those molecules not only become polarised, but also reorient so that their symmetry axes align to the field.

In electromagnetism, the absolute permittivity, often simply called permittivity and denoted by the Greek letter ε (epsilon), is a measure of the electric polarizability of a dielectric. A material with high permittivity polarizes more in response to an applied electric field than a material with low permittivity, thereby storing more energy in the material. In electrostatics, the permittivity plays an important role in determining the capacitance of a capacitor.

The Fermi level of a solid-state body is the thermodynamic work required to add one electron to the body. It is a thermodynamic quantity usually denoted by µ or EF for brevity. The Fermi level does not include the work required to remove the electron from wherever it came from. A precise understanding of the Fermi level—how it relates to electronic band structure in determining electronic properties, how it relates to the voltage and flow of charge in an electronic circuit—is essential to an understanding of solid-state physics.

Electrostatics is a branch of physics that studies electric charges at rest.

In physics, the dissipation factor (DF) is a measure of loss-rate of energy of a mode of oscillation in a dissipative system. It is the reciprocal of quality factor, which represents the "quality" or durability of oscillation.

In physics, the electric displacement field or electric induction is a vector field that appears in Maxwell's equations. It accounts for the effects of free and bound charge within materials. "D" stands for "displacement", as in the related concept of displacement current in dielectrics. In free space, the electric displacement field is equivalent to flux density, a concept that lends understanding of Gauss's law. In the International System of Units (SI), it is expressed in units of coulomb per meter square (C⋅m−2).

In semiconductor physics, the depletion region, also called depletion layer, depletion zone, junction region, space charge region or space charge layer, is an insulating region within a conductive, doped semiconductor material where the mobile charge carriers have been diffused away, or have been forced away by an electric field. The only elements left in the depletion region are ionized donor or acceptor impurities.

Electric potential energy is a potential energy that results from conservative Coulomb forces and is associated with the configuration of a particular set of point charges within a defined system. An object may be said to have electric potential energy by virtue of either its own electric charge or its relative position to other electrically charged objects.

Comb-drives are microelectromechanical actuators, often used as linear actuators, which utilize electrostatic forces that act between two electrically conductive combs. Comb drive actuators typically operate at the micro- or nanometer scale and are generally manufactured by bulk micromachining or surface micromachining a silicon wafer substrate.

In mesoscopic physics, a Coulomb blockade (CB), named after Charles-Augustin de Coulomb's electrical force, is the decrease in electrical conductance at small bias voltages of a small electronic device comprising at least one low-capacitance tunnel junction. Because of the CB, the conductance of a device may not be constant at low bias voltages, but disappear for biases under a certain threshold, i.e. no current flows.

Vacuum permittivity, commonly denoted ε0, is the value of the absolute dielectric permittivity of classical vacuum. It may also be referred to as the permittivity of free space, the electric constant, or the distributed capacitance of the vacuum. It is an ideal (baseline) physical constant. Its CODATA value is:

Capacitors are manufactured in many styles, forms, dimensions, and from a large variety of materials. They all contain at least two electrical conductors, called plates, separated by an insulating layer (dielectric). Capacitors are widely used as parts of electrical circuits in many common electrical devices.

A capacitor is a device that stores electrical energy in an electric field by virtue of accumulating electric charges on two close surfaces insulated from each other. It is a passive electronic component with two terminals.

In electrical engineering, dielectric loss quantifies a dielectric material's inherent dissipation of electromagnetic energy. It can be parameterized in terms of either the loss angleδ or the corresponding loss tangenttan(δ). Both refer to the phasor in the complex plane whose real and imaginary parts are the resistive (lossy) component of an electromagnetic field and its reactive (lossless) counterpart.

In solid-state physics, the Poole–Frenkel effect is a model describing the mechanism of trap-assisted electron transport in an electrical insulator. It is named after Yakov Frenkel, who published on it in 1938, extending the theory previously developed by H. H. Poole.

Quantum capacitance, also called chemical capacitance and electrochemical capacitance, is a quantity first introduced by Serge Luryi (1988), and is defined as the variation of electrical charge with respect to the variation of electrochemical potential , i.e., .

This article provides a more detailed explanation of p–n diode behavior than is found in the articles p–n junction or diode.

Double-layer capacitance is the important characteristic of the electrical double layer which appears, for example, at the interface between a conductive electrode and an adjacent liquid electrolyte. At this boundary two layers of charge with opposing polarity form, one at the surface of the electrode, and one in the electrolyte. These two layers, electrons on the electrode and ions in the electrolyte, are typically separated by a single layer of solvent molecules that adhere to the surface of the electrode and act like a dielectric in a conventional capacitor. The amount of electric charge stored in double-layer capacitor depends on the applied voltage. The unit of capacitance is the farad.

In semiconductor electrochemistry, a Mott–Schottky plot describes the reciprocal of the square of capacitance versus the potential difference between bulk semiconductor and bulk electrolyte. In many theories, and in many experimental measurements, the plot is linear. The use of Mott–Schottky plots to determine system properties is termed Mott–Schottky analysis.

Electromagnetism is one of the fundamental forces of nature. Early on, electricity and magnetism were studied separately and regarded as separate phenomena. Hans Christian Ørsted discovered that the two were related – electric currents give rise to magnetism. Michael Faraday discovered the converse, that magnetism could induce electric currents, and James Clerk Maxwell put the whole thing together in a unified theory of electromagnetism. Maxwell's equations further indicated that electromagnetic waves existed, and the experiments of Heinrich Hertz confirmed this, making radio possible. Maxwell also postulated, correctly, that light was a form of electromagnetic wave, thus making all of optics a branch of electromagnetism. Radio waves differ from light only in that the wavelength of the former is much longer than the latter. Albert Einstein showed that the magnetic field arises through the relativistic motion of the electric field and thus magnetism is merely a side effect of electricity. The modern theoretical treatment of electromagnetism is as a quantum field in quantum electrodynamics.

References

1. Harrington, Roger F. (2003). Introduction to Electromagnetic Engineering (1st ed.). Dover Publications. p. 43. ISBN   0-486-43241-6.
3. William D. Greason (1992). Electrostatic discharge in electronics. Research Studies Press. p. 48. ISBN   978-0-86380-136-5.
4. "Lecture notes: Capacitance and Dieletrics" (PDF). University of New South Wales. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2009.
5. Tipler, Paul; Mosca, Gene (2004). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (5th ed.). Macmillan. p. 752. ISBN   978-0-7167-0810-0.
6. Massarini, A.; Kazimierczuk, M. K. (1997). "Self capacitance of inductors". IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 12 (4): 671–676. Bibcode:1997ITPE...12..671M. CiteSeerX  . doi:10.1109/63.602562: example of the use of the term 'self capacitance'.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
7. Jackson, John David (1999). Classical Electrodynamic (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 43. ISBN   978-0-471-30932-1.
8. Maxwell, James (1873). "3". A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Vol. 1. Clarendon Press. p. 88ff.
9. "Capacitance: Charge as a Function of Voltage". Av8n.com. Retrieved 20 September 2010.
10. Smolić, Ivica; Klajn, Bruno (2021). "Capacitance matrix revisited". Progress in Electromagnetics Research B. 92: 1–18. arXiv:. doi:. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
11. "Capacitor MF-MMFD Conversion Chart". Just Radios.
12. Fundamentals of Electronics. Vol. 1b – Basic Electricity – Alternating Current. Bureau of Naval Personnel. 1965. p.  197.
13. Dawes, Chester L. (1973). "Capacitance and potential gradients of eccentric cylindrical condensers". Physics. 4 (2): 81–85. doi:10.1063/1.1745162.
14. Jackson, J. D. (1975). Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley. p. 80.
15. Binns; Lawrenson (1973). Analysis and computation of electric and magnetic field problems. Pergamon Press. ISBN   978-0-08-016638-4.
16. Maxwell, J.;C. (1873). A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Dover. p. 266 ff. ISBN   978-0-486-60637-8.
17. Rawlins, A.D. (1985). "Note on the capacitance of two closely separated spheres". IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics. 34 (1): 119–120. doi:10.1093/imamat/34.1.119.
18. Gasper; Rahman (2004). Basic Hypergeometric Series. Cambridge University Press. p.20-22. ISBN   978-0-521-83357-8.
19. Jackson, J.D. (1975). Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley. p. 128, problem  3.3.
20. Maxwell, J. C. (1878). "On the electrical capacity of a long narrow cylinder and of a disk of sensible thickness". Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. IX: 94–101. doi:10.1112/plms/s1-9.1.94.
21. Vainshtein, L. A. (1962). "Static boundary problems for a hollow cylinder of finite length. III Approximate formulas". Zhurnal Tekhnicheskoi Fiziki . 32: 1165–1173.
22. Jackson, J. D. (2000). "Charge density on thin straight wire, revisited". American Journal of Physics. 68 (9): 789–799. Bibcode:2000AmJPh..68..789J. doi:10.1119/1.1302908.
23. Raphael Tsu (2011). Superlattice to Nanoelectronics. Elsevier. pp. 312–315. ISBN   978-0-08-096813-1.
24. T. LaFave Jr. (2011). "Discrete charge dielectric model of electrostatic energy". J. Electrostatics. 69 (6): 414–418. arXiv:. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2011.06.006. S2CID   94822190.
25. G. J. Iafrate; K. Hess; J. B. Krieger; M. Macucci (1995). "Capacitive nature of atomic-sized structures". Phys. Rev. B. 52 (15): 10737–10739. Bibcode:1995PhRvB..5210737I. doi:10.1103/physrevb.52.10737. PMID   9980157.
26. T. LaFave Jr; R. Tsu (March–April 2008). "Capacitance: A property of nanoscale materials based on spatial symmetry of discrete electrons" (PDF). Microelectronics Journal. 39 (3–4): 617–623. doi:10.1016/j.mejo.2007.07.105. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 12 February 2014.
27. Laux, S.E. (October 1985). "Techniques for small-signal analysis of semiconductor devices". IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems. 4 (4): 472–481. doi:10.1109/TCAD.1985.1270145. S2CID   13058472.
28. Jonscher, A.K. (1986). "The physical origin of negative capacitance". J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II. 82: 75–81. doi:10.1039/F29868200075.
29. Ershov, M.; Liu, H.C.; Li, L.; Buchanan, M.; Wasilewski, Z.R.; Jonscher, A.K. (October 1998). "Negative capacitance effect in semiconductor devices". IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 45 (10): 2196–2206. arXiv:. Bibcode:1998ITED...45.2196E. doi:10.1109/16.725254. S2CID   204925581.
• Tipler, Paul (1998). Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Vol. 2: Electricity and Magnetism, Light (4th ed.). W. H. Freeman. ISBN   1-57259-492-6
• Serway, Raymond; Jewett, John (2003). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (6th ed.). Brooks Cole. ISBN   0-534-40842-7
• Saslow, Wayne M.(2002). Electricity, Magnetism, and Light. Thomson Learning. ISBN   0-12-619455-6. See Chapter 8, and especially pp. 255–259 for coefficients of potential.