![]() | The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline .(March 2013) |
Part of a series on |
![]() |
---|
Esperanto and Novial are two different constructed international auxiliary languages. Their main difference is that while Esperanto is a schematic language, with an unvarying grammar, Novial is a naturalistic language, whose grammar and vocabulary varies to try to retain a "natural" sound. Demographically, Esperanto has thousands of times more speakers than Novial.
Both Esperanto and Novial are written using versions of the Latin alphabet. The Esperanto alphabet has 28 letters: 22 without diacritics and 6 with diacritics unique to Esperanto: ĉ, ĝ, ĥ, ĵ, ŝ and ŭ. Novial uses the standard 26 letters of the Latin alphabet with no diacritics.
Esperanto | IPA | Novial |
---|---|---|
A, a | [ a ] | A, a |
B, b | [ b ] | B, b |
C, c | [ ts ] | Ts, ts; S, s |
Ĉ, ĉ | [ tʃ ] | Ch, ch; Sh, sh |
D, d | [ d ] | D, d |
E, e | [ e ] or [ ɛ ] | E, e |
F, f | [ f ] | F, f |
G, g | [ ɡ ] | G, g |
Ĝ, ĝ | [ dʒ ] | J, j |
H, h | [ h ] | H, h |
Ĥ, ĥ | [ x ] | K, k |
I, i | [ i ] | I, i |
J, j | [ j ] | Y, y |
Ĵ, ĵ | [ ʒ ] | J, j |
K, k | [ k ] | K, k |
L, l | [ l ] | L, l |
M, m | [ m ] | M, m |
N, n | [ n ] | N, n |
O, o | [ o ] or [ ɔ ] | O, o |
P, p | [ p ] | P, p |
Kv kv | [kv] | Qu, qu |
R, r | [ r ] | R, r |
S, s | [ s ] | S, s; Z, z |
Ŝ, ŝ | [ ʃ ] | Sh, sh; Ch, ch |
T, t | [ t ] | T, t |
U, u | [ u ] | U, u |
Ŭ, ŭ | [u̯] | U, u (after a vowel) |
V, v | [ v ] | V, v; W, w |
Ks, ks; kz | [ks],[ɡz] | X, x |
Z, z | [ z ] | Z, z; S, s |
In Esperanto one letter corresponds to one phoneme and one phoneme to one letter: there are no digraphs. Novial has 3 digraphs: ch, sh and qu; c and q are unique to these digraphs (except in foreign proper nouns) and permit no ambiguity; when s and h are separate phonemes this is indicated by separating with a hyphen: s-h. Novial permits some 2-vowel combinations to be pronounced either as 2 separate vowels or as diphthongs; for example, au, eu and oi may be pronounced as a + w, e + w and o + y, respectively, and ie, io and ia as y + e, y + o and y + a, respectively.
In handwriting neither Esperanto nor Novial presents any problem. However, the diacritics of Esperanto require special methods for typing and printing. The original method was a set of digraphs now known as the "h-system", but with the rise of computer word processing a so-called "x-system" has become equally popular. These systems are described in the article Esperanto orthography. However, with the advent of Unicode, the need for such work-arounds has lessened.
The personal pronouns of Esperanto all end in i and some may be difficult to distinguish in a noisy environment (especially mi and ni). The personal pronouns of Novial use various vowels making them more distinct, although some differ only in the initial consonant (e.g. nus, vus and lus). A later form of nus – nos, more distinct from vus – has sometimes been used. Novial does not distinguish familiar and polite forms of “you” (e.g. French tu and vous). Novial's inventor argued that such a distinction has no place in a language intended solely for international use. The distinction is available in Esperanto [ citation needed ] but is little used in practice.
singular | plural | indef. | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | |||||||||
familiar | formal | m. | f. | n. | pan-gender | m. | f. | n. | pan-gender | |||||
English | I | thou¹ | you¹ | he | she | it | they/it | we | you | they | one | |||
Esperanto | mi | ci¹ | vi¹ | li | ŝi | ĝi | -/ri²/ĝi²/gi | ni | vi | iŝi³ | iĝi³ | ili/iri³ | oni | |
Novial | me | vu | vu | lo | la | lu | le | nus | vus | los | las | lus | les | on |
² tiu, "that person", is usually used in this circumstance, because many people find it unnatural to use "it" referring to humans.
Apart from Ĝiism and Giism, Hiism and Riism as proposed reforms replace "Fundamento"-pronouns (ri instead of "li, ŝi, ĝi"; or "li" as utrum and hi instead of Fundamento "li"). Other proposals are variations of those four.
³iŝi, iĝi and by extension iri are proposed neologisms
The Novial system displays a systematic correspondence between singular and corresponding plural forms (i.e. vu, vus; lo, los; la, las; lu, lus; le, les). Strictly speaking "we" is not the plural of "I", because "many I’s" is nonsensical. Jespersen suggested that nu, the singular of nus, could be used as a "royal we". The optional marking of sex in Novial, especially in the third person plural, permits greater flexibility than in Esperanto, at least in this case. Exactly the same system is applied to other pronouns and to nouns with natural sex differences.
The system of sex marking for Esperanto nouns is frequently criticised for being asymmetric and male biased. In contrast Novial has one symmetric, unbiased system for both nouns and pronouns which marks either male, female, epicene or inanimate.
The grammars of Novial and Esperanto differ greatly in the way that the various tenses, moods and voices of verbs are expressed. Both use a combination of auxiliary verbs and verb endings. However, Novial uses many more auxiliary verbs and few endings, while Esperanto uses only one auxiliary verb and a greater number of verb endings.
In Novial all verb forms are independent of person (1st, 2nd or 3rd persons) and number (singular or plural). In Esperanto verb forms are independent of the person but compound tenses, with participles, require the participle (which is an adjective) to agree with the subject of the verb in number (singular or plural).
The continuous tenses are less common in both Esperanto and Novial than in English.
In the following table endings are separated from stems by hyphens. Alternative forms with the same meaning are in brackets. In the Esperanto forms (j) indicates agreement when the subject of the verb is plural.
English | Esperanto | Novial | |
---|---|---|---|
Infinitive | (to) love | am-i | ama |
Simple present | love(s) | am-as | ama |
Future | will (shall) love | am-os | sal ama |
Simple past | loved | am-is | did ama (ama-d) |
Present perfect | have (has) loved | est-as am-int-a(j) | ha ama |
Pluperfect | had loved | est-is am-int-a(j) | ha-d ama |
Future perfect | will (shall) have loved | est-os am-int-a(j) | sal ha ama |
Future in the past | was going to (would, should) love | est-is am-ont-a(j) | sal-ed ama |
Conditional | would (should) love | am-us | vud ama |
Conditional perfect | would (should) have loved | est-us am-int-a(j) | vud ha ama |
First imperative | let us love! | ni am-u! | let nus ama! |
Second imperative | love! | am-u! | ama! |
Third imperative | let him love! | li am-u! | let lo ama! |
Present continuous | is (am, are) loving | est-as am-ant-a(j) | es ama-nt |
Future continuous | shall (will) be loving | est-os am-ant-a(j) | sal es ama-nt |
Past continuous | was (were) loving | est-is am-ant-a(j) | did es (es-ed) ama-nt |
The difference between the passive of becoming and the passive of being is not always immediately obvious to English speakers because their forms can often be the same. However, in English the passive of becoming is often expressed with the verb get in the sense of become as well as with the verb be.
Esperanto uses an appropriate form of the auxiliary verb esti (to be) followed by a passive participle (present, past or future according to sense). With many verbs Esperanto may, instead of the passive voice, use the suffix -iĝ- to form an intransitive verb of becoming, which is conjugated in the active voice (see table below).
Novial uses the auxiliary verb bli (to get, become, be from the equivalent auxiliary verb bli in Scandinavian languages) followed by the root form of the verb. The various tenses and moods are expressed regularly using the other auxiliary verbs ha, had, sal, saled and vud, the word order corresponding to the English.
English | Esperanto | Novial | |
---|---|---|---|
Infinitive | (to) get absorbed | est-i absorb-at-a(j) (absorb-iĝ-i) | bli absorba |
Simple present | get(s) absorbed | est-as absorb-at-a(j) (absorb-iĝ-as) | bli absorba |
Future | will (shall) get absorbed | est-os absorb-at-a(j) (absorb-iĝ-os) | sal bli absorba |
Simple past | got absorbed | est-is absorb-at-a(j) (absorb-iĝ-is) | bli-d absorba |
Past perfect | have (has) got absorbed | est-as absorb-it-a(j) (est-as absorb-iĝ-ant-a(j)) | ha bli absorba |
Pluperfect | had got absorbed | est-is absorb-it-a(j) (est-is absorb-iĝ-ant-a(j)) | ha-d bli absorba |
Future perfect | will (shall) have got absorbed | est-os absorb-it-a(j) (est-os absorb-iĝ-ant-a(j)) | sal ha bli absorba |
Future in the past | was going to (would, should) get absorbed | est-is absorb-ot-a(j) (est-is absorb-iĝ-ont-a(j)) | sal-ed bli absorba |
Conditional | would (should) get absorbed | est-us absorb-at-a(j) (absorb-iĝ-us) | vud bli absorba |
Conditional perfect | would (should) have got absorbed | est-us absorb-it-a(j) (est-us absorb-iĝ-ant-a(j)) | vud ha bli absorba |
First imperative | let us get absorbed! | ni est-u absorb-ataj! (ni absorb-iĝ-u!) | let nus bli absorba! |
Second imperative | get absorbed! | est-u absorb-at-a(j)! (absorb-iĝ-u!) | bli absorba! |
Third imperative | let him get absorbed! | li est-u absorb-at-a! (li absorb-iĝ-u) | let lo bli absorba! |
Present continuous | is (am, are) getting absorbed | est-as absorb-at-a(j) (est-as absorb-iĝ-ant-a(j)) | es bli-nt absorba |
Future continuous | shall (will) be getting absorbed | est-os absorb-at-a(j) (est-os absorb-iĝ-ant-a(j)) | sal es bli-nt absorba |
Past continuous | was (were) getting absorbed | est-is absorb-at-a(j) (est-is absorb-iĝ-ant-a(j)) | did es (es-ed) bli-nt absorba |
The passive voice of being is generally expressed in English with an appropriate form of the verb to be followed by the past participle. It is formed in the same way in Esperanto and Novial. Note that in contrast to the passive of becoming, in the Novial passive of being the auxiliary verb is followed by the past participle, which ends in -t.
English | Esperanto | Novial | |
---|---|---|---|
Infinitive | (to) be absorbed | est-i absorb-at-a(j) | es absorba-t |
Simple present | is (am, are) absorbed | est-as absorb-at-a(j) | es absorba-t |
Future | will (shall) be absorbed | est-os absorb-at-a(j) | sal es absorba-t |
Simple past | was absorbed | est-is absorb-at-a(j) | did es (es-ed) absorba-t |
Past perfect | have (has) been absorbed | est-as absorb-it-a(j) | ha es absorba-t |
Pluperfect | had been absorbed | est-is absorb-it-a(j) | ha-d es absorba-t |
Future perfect | will (shall) have been absorbed | est-os absorb-it-a(j) | sal ha es absorba-t |
Future in the past | was going to (would, should) be absorbed | est-is absorb-ot-a(j) | sal-ed es absorba-t |
Conditional | would (should) be absorbed | est-us absorb-at-a(j) | vud es absorba-t |
Conditional perfect | would (should) have been absorbed | est-us absorb-it-a(j) | vud ha es absorba-t |
First imperative | let us be absorbed! | ni est-u absorb-ataj! | let nus es absorba-t! |
Second imperative | be absorbed! | est-u absorb-at-a(j)! | es absorba-t! |
Third imperative | let him be absorbed! | li est-u absorb-at-a! | let lo es absorba-t! |
In Esperanto, most words are created from a set number of roots, endings, and affixes. This allows for a comparatively low number of words to be extended to a described vocabulary, resulting in easy learning. However, some[ who? ] argue that results in heavy reliance on common affixes. For example, Esperanto notoriously[ according to whom? ] relies heavily on the prefix mal- to form the opposite of an adjective or verb. The equivalent prefix in Novial, des-, is used to a much lesser degree.
Here is the Lord's Prayer in both languages:
Esperanto version:
| Novial version:
|
Esperanto is the most widely used constructed language intended for international communication; it was designed with highly regular grammatical rules, and as such is considered an easy language to learn.
Ido is a constructed language derived from Reformed Esperanto, and similarly designed with the goal of being a universal second language for people of diverse backgrounds. To function as an effective international auxiliary language, Ido was specifically designed to be grammatically, orthographically, and lexicographically regular. It is the most successful of the many Esperanto derivatives, called Esperantidoj.
Novial is a constructed international auxiliary language (IAL) for universal human communication between speakers of different native languages. It was devised by Otto Jespersen, a Danish linguist who had been involved in the Ido movement that evolved from Esperanto at the beginning of the 20th century, and participated later in the development of Interlingua. The name means 'new' + 'international auxiliary language'.
Volapük is a constructed language created between 1879 and 1880 by Johann Martin Schleyer, a Catholic priest in Baden, Germany, who believed that God had told him in a dream to create an international language. Notable as the first major constructed international auxiliary language, the grammar comes from European languages and the vocabulary mostly from English. However, the roots are often distorted beyond recognition.
The Finnish language is spoken by the majority of the population in Finland and by ethnic Finns elsewhere. Unlike the languages spoken in neighbouring countries, such as Swedish and Norwegian, which are North Germanic languages, or Russian, which is a Slavic language, Finnish is a Uralic language of the Finnic languages group. Typologically, Finnish is agglutinative. As in some other Uralic languages, Finnish has vowel harmony, and like other Finnic languages, it has consonant gradation.
Verbs constitute one of the main parts of speech in the English language. Like other types of words in the language, English verbs are not heavily inflected. Most combinations of tense, aspect, mood and voice are expressed periphrastically, using constructions with auxiliary verbs.
Southern or South Sámi is the southwesternmost of the Sámi languages, and is spoken in Norway and Sweden. It is an endangered language; the strongholds of this language are the municipalities of Snåsa, Røyrvik, Røros and Hattfjelldal in Norway. Of the approximately 2000 Southern Sami, only about 500 still speak fluent Southern Sami. This language belongs to the Saamic group within the Uralic language family.
Idiom Neutral is an international auxiliary language, published in 1902 by the International Academy of the Universal Language under the leadership of Waldemar Rosenberger, a St. Petersburg engineer.
An Esperantido is a constructed language derived from Esperanto. Esperantido originally referred to the language which is now known as Ido. The word Esperantido contains the affix (-ido), which means a "child, young or offspring". Hence, Esperantido literally means an 'offspring or descendant of Esperanto'.
Adjuvilo is a constructed language created in 1910 by Claudius Colas under the pseudonym of "Profesoro V. Esperema". Although it was a full language, it may not have been created to be spoken. Many believe that as an Esperantist, Colas created Adjuvilo to help create dissent in the then-growing Ido movement. Colas himself called his language simplified Ido and proposed several reforms to Ido.
Yiddish grammar is the system of principles which govern the structure of the Yiddish language. This article describes the standard form laid out by YIVO while noting differences in significant dialects such as that of many contemporary Hasidim. As a Germanic language descended from Middle High German, Yiddish grammar is fairly similar to that of German, though it also has numerous linguistic innovations as well as grammatical features influenced by or borrowed from Hebrew, Aramaic, and various Slavic languages.
Esperanto and Ido are constructed international auxiliary languages, with Ido being an Esperantido derived from Esperanto and Reformed Esperanto. The number of speakers is estimated at 100 thousand to 2 million for Esperanto, whereas Ido is much fewer at 100 to 1 thousand.
Novial was created as an international auxiliary language by Danish linguist Otto Jespersen, who introduced it to the world in 1928. Jespersen had previously been a co-author of Ido, which started to take form around 1907. Both languages base their vocabularies primarily on prominent Germanic and Romance languages, but differ grammatically in several important respects. Novial is more analytic in its grammar than Ido, and, in Jespersen's view, more natural.
Icelandic is an inflected language. Icelandic nouns can have one of three grammatical genders: masculine, feminine or neuter. Nouns, adjectives and pronouns are declined in four cases and two numbers, singular and plural.
In linguistic morphology, inflection is a process of word formation in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, mood, animacy, and definiteness. The inflection of verbs is called conjugation, and one can refer to the inflection of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, determiners, participles, prepositions and postpositions, numerals, articles, etc., as declension.
This article deals with the grammar of the Udmurt language.
This article deals with the grammar of the Komi language of the northeastern European part of Russia
Intal is an international auxiliary language, published in 1956 by the German linguist Erich Weferling. Its name is an acronym for INTernational Auxiliary Language. Intal was conceived to unite the most important features of existing international auxiliary languages, like Esperanto, Ido, Occidental-Interlingue, Neo, Novial and Interlingua, into a compromise system.
This article concerns the morphology of the Albanian language, including the declension of nouns and adjectives, and the conjugation of verbs. It refers to the Tosk-based Albanian standard regulated by the Academy of Sciences of Albania.
Lingwa de planeta is a constructed international auxiliary language based on widely spoken languages of the world, including Arabic, Mandarin, English, French, German, Hindi, Persian, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish.