Ithkuil

Last updated
Ithkuil
Iţkuîl
Ithkuil-name-v4.svg
Ithkuil-name.svg
Ithkuil in Ithkuil I.svg
Iţkuîl written in the Ithkuil writing systems
Pronunciation/ɪθˈkʊ.il/
Created byJohn Quijada
Date1978–2023
2023–present (as New Ithkuil)
UsersNone
Purpose
Morphophonemic
Language codes
ISO 639-3 None (mis)
Glottolog None
IETF art-x-ithkuil
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Ithkuil is an experimental constructed language created by John Quijada. [1] It is designed to express more profound levels of human cognition briefly yet overtly and clearly, particularly about human categorization. It is a cross between an a priori philosophical and a logical language. It tries to minimize the vagueness and semantic ambiguity in natural human languages. [2] Ithkuil is notable for its grammatical complexity and extensive phoneme inventory, the latter being simplified in an upcoming redesign. The name "Ithkuil" is an anglicized form of Iţkuîl, which in the original form roughly meant "hypothetical representation of a language." [2] Quijada states he did not create Ithkuil to be auxiliary or used in everyday conversations. Instead, he wanted the language for more elaborate and profound fields where more insightful thoughts are expected, such as philosophy, arts, science, and politics. [3]

Contents

Meaningful phrases or sentences can usually be expressed in Ithkuil with fewer linguistic units than natural languages. [2] For example, the two-word Ithkuil sentence "Tram-mļöi hhâsmařpţuktôx" can be translated into English as "On the contrary, I think it may turn out that this rugged mountain range trails off at some point." [2] Quijada deems his creation as too complex to have developed naturally, seeing it as an exercise in exploring how languages could function. Nevertheless, it was featured in the Language Creation Conference's 6th Conlang Relay.

Four versions of the language have been publicized: the initial version in 2004, a simplified version called Ilaksh in 2007, a third version in 2011, and the current version (as of February 2023), called New Ithkuil. [4] [5] [6] [7] In 2004 [8] —and again in 2009 [9] with Ilaksh—Ithkuil was featured in the Russian-language popular science and IT magazine Computerra . In 2008, David J. Peterson awarded it the Smiley Award. [10] In 2013, Bartłomiej Kamiński codified the language to parse complicated sentences quickly. [11] Julien Tavernier and anonymous others have since followed suit. [12] Since July 2015, Quijada has released several Ithkuil songs in a prog-rock style as part of the album Kaduatán, which translates to "Wayfarers." [13] Recently, online communities have developed in English, Russian, Mandarin, and Japanese.

Etymology

Versions of Ithkuil are generally numbered with Roman numerals, e.g. Ithkuil I, Ithkuil II. Despite this, Ithkuil has other names attached to it, either officially-named or was named by the Ithkuil-enthusiast community: Ithkuil I version was named as "Iţkuîl" (anglicised: Ithkuil; /ɪθˈkʊ.il/) which became the origin of the name "Ithkuil", Ithkuil II as "ilákš" (anglicised: ilaksh; /iˈlǎkʃ/), Ithkuil III as "Elartkha" or "elartkʰa" (/εˈlârtkʰa/), and Ithkuil IV which is commonly referred to as TNIL or "The New Ithuilic Language" or also known as "Malëuţřait" by the community. [14]

Ithkuil in Ithkuil I.svg
Ilaksh in Ithkuil II.svg
Ithkuil-name.svg
Ithkuil-name-v4.svg
The names of each version of Ithkuil in their respective writing systems. From top to bottom: "Iţkuîl" in the Ithkuil I writing system, "Ilákš" in the Ithkuil II artistic writing system, and "Iţkuil" (as a proper name, not a native word) in the Ithkuil III and IV writing systems

Ithkuil

(based entirely on the original Ithkuil grammar book)

The word iţkuîl was a formative derived from the rootk-l (broadly concerning "speech", "voice", or even "interpretation") through the addition of several morphological determinants:

kul was the holistic variety of the Stem 2 of the three other possible stems from k-l. Translating roughly as "a meaningful unit of speech", i.e. "a word", it gave no emphasis on the meaning or the vocal rendering of the word.
Secondarymode, as opposed to primarymode, meant that the word kuîl is not to refer to a real-life phenomenon, but rather to a mental representation, or projection, of that phenomenon; to an imaginary or hypothetical object. Thus translating as, "a made-up word".
The configuration of the term was composite. Roughly corresponding to the plurality concept in Indo-European languages, it also implies the objects in question (words, kuîl) to be diverse, while forming a "coherent emergent entity" (rather than just a collection or an array of different words), thus meaning "a vocabulary" or "lexicon".
The extension was delimitive, perceiving "vocabulary" as entire, with clearly distinguished boundaries, as opposed to it being just a local manifestation such as slang or a dialect of a broader lexicon (-ţkuîl).
The affiliation of the set of objects in question was coalescent. This indicates that the individual members of the set act together toward a higher purpose by coordinating their complementary functions. Thus, "a vocabulary/lexicon" becomes "a language".
The perspective of the noun is monadic, seeing "the language" as a single and specific entity, rather than a collection of many languages existing separately, the general phenomenon ("human languages") or the abstract idea of language.

Thus, the approximate translation of iţkuîl was "an idea/fantasy of a complete purposeful system of complementary speech elements", or simply "an imaginary language".

History

John Quijada's youth

John Quijada  [ id ] was born around 1959 in Los Angeles, United States to a Mexican-American immigrant couple. He is a native English speaker and can speak French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian. He also claims to be able to read in Catalan and Interlingua; however, he cannot converse in these languages. [15]

Quijada's interest in conlanging began when he was introduced to the utopian politics of the Esperanto group as well as some books from a record store near his home.[ dubious discuss ] In addition, during the 1970s, he discovered an album by the French band Magma, a progressive rock-genre group band which made songs in Kobaïan, a constructed language they created. He created his first constructed language at the age of 15 he called Mbozo. It was a combination of Romance-Germanic languages with vocabulary and phonology derived from African languages. Later on, he also created the Pskeoj, a language which was generated from "random typing on a typewriter". [16]

John Quijada pursued a linguistics degree at the Califonia State University, Fullerton with the ambition to become an anthropologist in the field of linguistics. However, he was unable to complete his undergraduate studies due to financial problems. [15] [16] [17] He was then worked at the United States Department of Motor Vehicles with the hope of continuing his studies when he had enough money. [17] In the meantime, he continued his studies in linguistics by himself. He "spent hours in the library" reading books on the elements of a language that is fairly exotic compared to many other languages in the world. In addition, Quijada also made annual visits to Cody's Books, a legendary bookstore in Berkeley, California to find new reads. From his reading, Quijada found "unique and exotic" features some languages have and had the desire to unify all of those into one language. [16] [17]

Influences

An example of vertical boustrophedonic Ithkuil text (2004). Translation: "As our vehicle leaves the ground and plunges over the edge of the cliff toward the valley floor, I ponder whether it is possible that one might allege I am guilty of an act of moral failure, having failed to maintain a proper course along the roadway." Romanized: Pull uiqisx ma'walg eryaufenien- patwic auxe'yalt xne'wilta'sui tua kit olla yaqazmuiv li'yirziska' p'amm ailo'wecca su'yehtas

.mw-parser-output .IPA-label-small{font-size:85%}.mw-parser-output .references .IPA-label-small,.mw-parser-output .infobox .IPA-label-small,.mw-parser-output .navbox .IPA-label-small{font-size:100%}
IPA: ['pUl.l U'IqISx 'ma?walg eRjaUfu'nIen 'paethwWc aU'xu?jalt xne?wWl'ta?sUI 'tUa kIt oel:'a ja'qazmUIv lI?jWr'zIska? p'am.'m a.Ilo'wutS:a SU?'jehtas] Ithkuil pull uiqisx.png
An example of vertical boustrophedonic Ithkuil text (2004). Translation: "As our vehicle leaves the ground and plunges over the edge of the cliff toward the valley floor, I ponder whether it is possible that one might allege I am guilty of an act of moral failure, having failed to maintain a proper course along the roadway." Romanized: Pull̀ uíqišx ma’wałg eřyaufënienˉ päţwïç auxë’yaļt xne’wïļta’şui tua kit öllá yaqazmuiv li’yïrzişka’ p’amḿ aìlo’wëčča šu’yehtaş
IPA: [ˈpʊl꜔꜖.l̩ʊˈɪ꜔꜖qɪʃxˈma꜔꜖ʔwaɫɡɛʁjaʊfɤˈnɪ˥ɛnˈpæθ꜔꜖wɯçaʊˈxɤ꜔꜖ʔjaɬtxnɛʔwɯɬˈtaʔ꜔꜖ʂʊɪˈtʊ꜔꜖akɪt꜔꜖œlːˈa꜔꜖jaˈqaz꜔꜖mʊɪvlɪʔjɯɾˈzɪʂ꜔꜖kaʔp’am.ˈm̩꜔꜖a.ɪlɔˈwɤ꜔꜖tʃːaʃʊʔˈjɛh꜔꜖taʂ]

Ithkuil evolved over 45 years as a linguistic experiment beyond Western Indo-European languages in response to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and Charles J. Fillmore’s case grammar into "a complex, intricate array of interwoven grammatical concepts" with "ideas inspired by countless hours studying texts in theoretical linguistics, cognitive grammar, psycholinguistics, language acquisition, linguistic relativity, semantics, semiotics, philosophy, fuzzy set theory, and even quantum physics." Ithkuil was heavily inspired by cognitive linguists including George Lakoff, Ronald Langacker, Gilles Fauconnier, and Len Talmy.

For his influences, Quijada cites the obscure "morphophonology of Abkhaz verb complexes, the moods of verbs of certain American Indian languages, the aspectual system of Niger–Kordofanian languages, the nominal case systems of Basque and Dagestanian languages, the enclitic system of the Wakashan languages, the positional orientation systems of Tzeltal and Guugu Yimithirr, the Semitic triliteral root morphology, and the hearsay and possessive categories of Suzette Elgin's Láadan language". The writing system's logical design borrows principles from Ethiopic and Brahmi scripts, but employs a unique morphophonemic principle. [2] The script used throughout the Ithkuil grammar bears a superficial resemblance to Hebrew square script and the various Klingon fonts. Furthermore, Ilaksh had a "cartouche script" and a cursive format (the former of which had been an upcoming aesthetic project of the designer's).

Ilaksh (2007)

The initial publication of Ithkuil in 2004 had an extensive phonology of 65 consonants and 17 vowels. After a mention of Ithkuil in the Russian magazine Computerra, [8] several speakers of Russian contacted Quijada and expressed enthusiasm to learn Ithkuil for its application to psychonetics, with several complaining about its difficulty in pronunciation. Quijada remade Ithkuil's morphophonology with 30 consonants and 10 vowels (and the addition of tones) and published the revision on 10 June 2007 as Ilaksh. [2] The language featured other amendments to grammar, including some additional Levels and a change of Cases. It was redesigned to be easier to speak and included an additional writing system. [18] [19] [20] The initial sequential "informal" system suitable for handwriting or compact typesetting, and a "formal" logographic system with artistic possibilities resembling Maya scripts.

In the "informal" writing system, several parallel sets of lines are shaped to correspond sequentially to the different parallel sets of lexemes and inflections. It is directly pronounceable. The author designed it with reserve for convenient handwriting. The overall design would permit compact, clear, black-and-white rendering.

In the colorful "formal" script, a single complex glyph represented an entire sentence. Diversely shaped, shaded and superimposed cartouches represent the syntactic relations of the verb and noun phrases of a sentence. The edges of the cartouches had particular shapes that indicate one set of inflections, the colors indicate another set of inflections, and the textures yet another one. On the cartouches, letters of hexagonal outline would spell out the forms of particular lexemes. The cartouches formed phrases, with primary phrases overlapping subordinate phrases. The coloring system utilized different color densities and texturing for different colors in order to be usable by colorblind people. These density conventions also allowed the formal system to be inexpensively printed in black-and-white, or inscribed or imprinted on stone or other materials. [21]

Ithkuil (2011)

Ilaksh was superseded by a morphologically similar language also termed Ithkuil because of its ties to the initial publication. The script uses a unique morphophonemic principle that allows sentences representing grammatical categories to be pronounced in multiple ways as the speaker sees fit. It was deemed the final version of the language, which grew attention to conlangers on social media. One blog translates "I am sleepy because those damn cats were fighting all night and I couldn’t sleep well!" as ur-rn aičnattîbi tei n-nrai’dáčnuitîb ti wëqam-msukšš hwaičúitôkçuxh rrolp żü’âluss. [22]

In 2014 the category of register was introduced and in 2015 a mathematical and measurement-based sublanguage was published. Dozens on the community Reddit forum have proposed revisions to make the language more learnable. Quijada plans to adopt the cartouche script "for use as an alternative, 'ornamental' writing system for artistic purposes" to Ithkuil in a future update of the language.

New Ithkuil (2023)

Owing to complaints about the difficult patterns in the language morphology, on 30 October 2017 Quijada published a tentative outline for a new version of the language, addressing learners' desires for a more agglutinative morphophonology, including a restructured formative outline, and extended use of Adjuncts for shortened expression of the grammar to further create phonaesthetics. Quijada has considered mandating verbal categories expressed in formatives to be redundantly spoken aloud in adjuncts to be more naturalistic. Despite the complexity of the language, intended only as an experiment without concern for the constraints of human learnability, he has published several updates for a new language predicated off the original grammar, most recently in November 2019. [23] [24] The new language is intended to feature an expanded lexicon and writing system that can be handwritten.

In February 2023, Quijada published the fourth iteration of the language, titled New Ithkuil, and announced that the previous version would remain online for archival purposes. [25]

Outline

Phonology

The phonology consists of 31 consonants and 9 vowels. The consonants are as follows:

Labial Dental Alveolar Alveolar~Retroflex Post-
alveolar
Palatal Velar Uvular Glottal
central lateral
Nasal m

() hm

n

(n̪̥) hn

ŋ ň/ņ
Stop/

Affricate

voiced b d d͡z d͡ʒ j ɡ
voiceless p t t͡s c t͡ʃ č k ʔ
aspirated (pʰ) ph(t̪ʰ) th(t͡sʰ) ch(t͡ʃʰ) čh(kʰ) kh
Fricative voiced v ð z ʒ ž
voiceless f θ ţ s ɬ ļ ʃ š ç x ~χ h
Trill (r) rr(ʀ) řř
Flap ɾ~ ɽ r (ɾ̥) hr
Approximant w l(ɹ) r j y( w ) ʁ̞ ř

The consonants c’,č’, k’, p’, q, , q’, t’, and xh are eliminated, x is pronounced [x]~[ χ ], ň will be written as n before k, g, or x, and dh is now written as (or optionally đ or ). The clusters with h are disyllabic in word-medial positions, but usually form allophones when found at the beginning of words. For example, word-medially kh would be pronounced [kh] as in the English word "backhanded", but kh is pronounced [kʰ] in the New Ithkuil word "khala". The forms hl, hr, hm, and hn can be pronounced either as [ɬ], [ɾ̥], [m̥], and [n̥] respectively, or as separate consonants. Combinations of a voiced consonant plus following -h- are always dissyllabic. r is pronounced as a tap [ɾ], but becomes a trill [r] when geminated. Following another consonant, a non-geminated r may optionally be pronounced as an apico-alveolar-retroflex approximant [ɹ]. When ř is geminated it is either [ʁ:] or can be strengthened to a uvular trill [ʀ].

The vowels are as follows:

Front Central Back
Close i~ɪ i ʉ ~y ü u ~ʊ u
Close-mid e ~ɛ e ø ~œ ö ə ~ʌ ë o ~ɔ o
Open æ ä a ~ɑ a

The vowels ê, î, ô, and û are removed from Ithkuil III to allow for easier memorization. The letter ä, pronounced [æ], is introduced. a is pronounced [a]~[ɑ], e is pronounced [e]~[ɛ], i is pronounced [i]~[ɪ], o is pronounced [o]~[ɔ], u is pronounced [u]~[ʊ], ë is pronounced [ə]~[ʌ], ü is pronounced as [ʉ]~[y], and ö is pronounced as [ø]~[œ]. Rules for external junction between words have been described for speakers to be able to clearly parse word boundaries.

Stress is marked with an acute diacritic on letters without diacritics and the circumflex on letters with a diaeresis. The letters i and u are marked with a grave diacritic when they are unstressed and the first of more than one vowel after a consonant to remind the reader that they are pronounced [iː] and [u] and not [j] nor [w], respectively.

Grammar

The grammar is largely the same as in Ithkuil III, but with a greater focus on the scope of grammatical categories to be more logical. Stem pattern has been replaced by stem specification, and Suffixes were renamed Affixes. The categories of Designation, Sanction, and Modality have been supplanted by affixual forms. Possessive cases are named Appositive; Associative cases split into Associative, Adverbial, Relational, and Affinitive; and Comparative cases are eliminated. The Ca complex is modular and various categories follow a 9-valued vowel sequence. Incorporated roots have been replaced by a system of concatenation. Formatives and personal reference categories now have the option to carry Effect, a category prescribing beneficial, detrimental, or neutral states to a referent.[ excessive detail? ]

Lexicon

The lexicon includes over 6000 roots and around 520 affixes.

Writing system

An example of Ithkuil's script meaning "Be careful, your fork is actually a fennec."
Handwritten form of the above text. Ithkuil IV example.svg
An example of Ithkuil's script meaning "Be careful, your fork is actually a fennec."
Handwritten form of the above text. Ithkuil IV example handwritten.svg
Handwritten form of the above text.

Ithkuil's writing system is unique to the language and is not similar to any natural writing systems. The writing system is morpho-phonetic, meaning two types of graphemes are used: one to represent different grammatical concepts, such as case, number etc. and the other to represent roots and affixes. John Quijada provides an example, saying that an example of word in a morpho-phonemic writing system would be (pronounced went), where the root would be "go" and past tense would be indicated by diagonal bar through the vowel.

Possible advantages

The Sapir–Whorf hypothesis postulates that a person's language influences their perceptions and cognitive patterns. Stanislav Kozlovsky speculated [8] in the Russian popular-scientific magazine Computerra that a fluent speaker of Ithkuil, accordingly, would think "about five or six times as fast" as a speaker of a typical natural language. The Sapir–Whorf hypothesis would suggest that, Ithkuil being an extremely precise and synthetic language, its speakers would have a more discerning, deeper understanding both of everyday situations and of broader phenomena, and of abstract philosophical categories.

However, strong forms of the hypothesis, which postulate that language determines thought and not only influences it, have been rejected by mainstream linguistics. [26] Moreover, in line with this, Quijada has stated he does not believe a speaker would think necessarily any faster because even though Ithkuil is terse, a single word requires a lot more thought before it can be spoken than it would in a natural language. [15]

Kozlovsky also likened Ithkuil to the fictional Speedtalk from Robert A. Heinlein's novella Gulf , and contrasted both languages with the Newspeak of the communicationally restricted society of Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four . Ithkuil is by far the most complete language of the three, as the lexicon and grammar are described in far greater detail. John Quijada acknowledged the similarity of Ithkuil's design goals to those of Speedtalk, [3] remarking that,

[h]owever, Heinlein's Speedtalk appears to focus only on the morpho-phonological component of language[, whereas] Ithkuil has been designed with an equal focus on [morphology, lexico-morphology, or lexico-semantics]. Additionally, the apparent purpose of Heinlein's language is simple rapidity/brevity of speech and thought, while Ithkuil is focused on maximal communication in the most efficient manner, a somewhat different purpose, in which brevity per se is irrelevant.

Past versions

Ithkuil (2004)

The original version of Ithkuil had a significantly more complicated morphophonology.

Phonology

At the left of each cell in the table below is the phoneme, and at the right its transliterated representation. The original 65 consonants were as follows:

Labial Dental Alveolar Retroflex Post-
alveolar
Palatal Velar Uvular Pharyngeal Glottal
central lateral
Nasal m n ŋ ņ
Plosive voiced b d ɟ ǰ ɡ ɢ ġ
voiceless p t c ķ k q ʔ
aspirated t̪ʰ ķʰ
ejective t̪ʼ ķʼ
Affricate voiced d͡z ƶ ɖ͡ʐ ż d͡ʒ j
voiceless t͡s c ʈ͡ʂ ċ t͡ʃ č
aspiratedt͡sʰ cʎ̥˔ʰ ʈ͡ʂʰ ċʰt͡ʃʰ čʰ
ejective t͡sʼ c’ ʈ͡ʂʼ ċʼ t͡ʃʼ č’c͡çʼ çʼk͡xʼ q͡χʼ x̧ʼ
Fricative voiced v ð z ʐ ʒ ž ʝ ɣ ǧ
voiceless f θ ţ s ɬ ļ ʂ ş ʃ š ç x χ ħ h
Liquid flap ɽ r
non-flap l ɻ ŗ
Approximant w ɫ̪ ł j y ʁ̞ ř

/wɫ̪/ were velarized and /mŋlɫɻ/ could be syllabic. h was [ɸ] when preceded by a vowel and followed by another consonant. [cʎ̥˔ʰ] was in free variation with [cʎ̥˔ʼ], the latter being more common at the beginning of a word (both spelled ). All consonants except y and w could be geminated; when geminated, h was a bidental fricative ([h̪͆]) and r was an alveolar trill ([r]).

At the left of each cell in the table below is the phoneme, and at the right its transliterated representation. The original 17 vowels are as follows:

Front Central Back
Close i î y ÿ ʉ ü ɯ ï u û
Near-close ɪ i ʊ u
Close-mid e ê ø ɤ ë o ô
Open-mid ɛ e œ ö ɔ o
Open æ ä a ɑ â

The diphthongs were /ai̯/, /æi̯/, /ei̯/, /ɤi̯/, /øi̯/, /oi̯/, /ʊi̯/, /au̯/, /æu̯/, /eu̯/, /ɤu̯/, /ɪu̯/, /ou̯/, /øu̯/, /aɯ̯/, /eɯ̯/, /ɤɯ̯/, /ʊɯ̯/, /oɯ̯/, /ɪɯ̯/, /æɯ̯/, /øɯ̯/, /ʉɯ̯/, /ae̯/. All other sequences of vowels were pronounced as separate syllables.

Grammar

The lexicon of the original Ithkuil consisted of the same patterns as the 2011 form of the language. However, each root consisted of 2 consonantal radicals, and could derive thousands of lexemes through the use of Ithkuil's complex rules of morphophonology, which involved both consonantal and vocal mutation, shifts in syllabic stress and tone, and affixation.

Ithkuil words can be divided into just two parts of speech, formatives and adjuncts. Formatives functioned both as nouns and as verbs, depending on the morphosemantic context. Formatives were inflected for the current grammatical categories, plus 2 foci, and 81 cases; they could also have taken on some of the 153 affixes, which further qualified into one of 9 degrees. Verbal formatives were additionally inflected for 7 conflations.

Verbal adjuncts similarly worked in conjunction with adjacent formatives to provide additional grammatical information. Two types of verbal adjuncts were inflected to indicate 14 valencies, 6 versions, 8 formats, 37 derivations, 30 modalities, 4 levels, 9 validations, 9 phases, 9 sanctions, 32 aspects, 8 moods, and 24 biases.

Ilaksh (2007)

In an effort to make the language more speakable, Quijada created a revision called Ilaksh that relied on tone to reduce the phonemic inventory.

The phonological system of Ilaksh was revised to consist of only 30 consonants and 10 vowels. The consonants are the same as those of Ithkuil IV with the omission of the voiceless alveolar lateral fricative ɬ . /m ŋ l ɽ/ could be syllabic. All consonants except /j w ʔ/ could be geminated; when geminated, h was a bidental fricative or a voiceless pharyngeal fricative, and ɽ was an alveolar trill. The clusters /n̪j/, /tj/, /dj/, and /lj/ could be pronounced as such or as the palatals [ɲ], [c], [ɟ], and [ʎ]. The orthography used ⟨đ ŧ ż⟩ instead of ⟨ḑ ţ ẓ⟩.

The vowels were the same as those of Ithkuil IV, but with an additional vowel pronounced as /ɨ/ or /ɯ/. The 14 diphthongs of Ilaksh were /ai̯/, /æi̯/, /ei̯/, /əi̯/, /oi̯/, /øi̯/, /ui̯/, /au̯/, /æu̯/, /eu̯/, /əu̯/, /iu̯/, /ou̯/, and /øu̯/. All other sequences of vowels were pronounced as separate syllables.

Ithkuil (2011)

Phonology

Ithkuil has 45 consonants and 13 vowels. At the left of each cell in the table below is the phoneme, and at the right its transliterated representation if it is not written the same in IPA as in romanized Ithkuil. The consonants are as follows: [27]

Labial Dental Alveolar Retroflex Post-
alveolar
Palatal Velar Uvular Glottal
central lateral
Nasal m n ŋ ň
Plosive/

Affricate

voiced b d d͡z ż d͡ʒ j ɡ
voiceless p t t͡s c t͡ʃ č k q ʔ
aspirated t̪ʰ t͡sʰ t͡ʃʰ čʰ
ejective t̪ʼ t͡sʼ c’ t͡ʃʼ č’
Fricative voiced v ð dh z ʒ ž
voiceless f θ ţ s ɬ ļ ʃ š ç x χ xh h
Flap ɽ r
Approximant l j y w ʁ̞ ř

/mŋlɽ/ can be syllabic. All consonants except /jwʔ/ can be geminated; when geminated, /h/ is a bidental fricative or a voiceless pharyngeal fricative ([ ħ ]), and /ɽ/ is an alveolar trill.

The 13 vowels of Ithkuil are as follows: [27]

Front Central Back
Close î ʉ ~ y ü û
Near-close ɪ i ʊ u
Close-mid ê ô
Mid œ ~ ø ö ə <ë>
Open-mid ɛ e ɔ o
Open ä a ɑ â

/ ɪ ʊ / are pronounced as / i u / when they precede another vowel, and at the end of a word. / ɛ ɔ / are pronounced / e o / when they precede another vowel, except / ɪ ʊ /.

The diphthongs in Ithkuil are /äɪ̯/, /ɛɪ̯/, /əɪ̯/, /ɔɪ̯/, /ø̞ɪ̯/, /ʊɪ̯/, /äʊ̯/, /ɛʊ̯/, /əʊ̯/, /ɪʊ̯/, /ɔʊ̯/, /ø̞ʊ̯/. All other sequences of vowels are pronounced as separate syllables. The grave accent is used to indicate the vowel sequence is not a diphthong. The grave and acute accents are used for stress. In a future revision of the language, circumflex accents will be used for stress, but grave accents will not be used for stress, and will only be used to indicate the vowel sequence is not a diphthong so that the rules for marking stress are simplified.

Morphophonology

Ithkuil words can be divided into just two parts of speech, Formatives and Adjuncts. Formatives can function both as nouns and as verbs, derived from the root and depending on the morphosemantic context. They can be expanded through various ‘suffixes’. [28] Adjuncts serve two roles, either indicating personal referents like pronouns, or specifying additional verbal information such as grammatical bias. In a future version of the language, adjuncts will be able to convey suffix (or rather, affix) information.

Formatives

Roots are Ithkuil's most basic semantic units. All Ithkuil formatives are derived from a limited number of roots. Each root consists of a cluster of 1–4 consonants (five-consonant clusters are also available, but remain without an assigned meaning). [28] The current lexicon of Ithkuil can potentially consist of approximately 3,600 word roots, just over 1000 of which have been assigned definitions. [28] [29] From the root, word stems are formed by affixing the vocalic affix that indicates stem pattern, stem type, function for the stem, and by stressing a particular syllable to indicate informal or formal designation. [28]

There are three stems associated with each root. Each stem comes in three patterns, one holistic and two complementary ones. Holistic stem 1 typically refers to the most general manifestation of a root, whereas holistic stems 2 and 3 typically refer to more specific manifestations associated with the root. Each holistic stem has two complementary stems associated with it, which refer to the complementary concepts related to the holistic stem. [28] The specific meaning of complementary stems depends somewhat on the root. These are derived from the word roots by prefixing a vowel or diphthong that also indicates the grammatical category function. [28] Two examples are given in the tables below:

Holistic stem 1Holistic stem 2Holistic stem 3
nuclear family member
(a)mm-
male nuclear family member
emm-
female nuclear family member
umm-
Complementary stemsComplementary stemsComplementary stems
parent
omm-
child
âmm-
father
ömm-
son
êmm-
mother
îmm-/ûmm
daughter
ômm-
Holistic stem 1Holistic stem 2Holistic stem 3
higher-order animal lifeform
(a)q-
human being
eq-
non-human higher-order animal lifeform
uq-
Complementary stemsComplementary stemsComplementary stems
male higher-order animal lifeform
oq-
female higher-order animal lifeform
âq-
male human being
öq-
female human being
êq-
male non-human higher-order animal lifeform
îq- / ûq-
female non-human higher-order animal lifeform
ôq-
Basic morphology

All Ithkuil formatives, whether functioning as nouns or verbs, inflect for various grammatical categories that are quite dissimilar from any of those in natural languages. [30] Quantization is more or less covered by the grammatical categories of Configuration, Affiliation, and Perspective, even though these do not technically refer to number per se. [30]

Configuration

The nine configurations (Uniplex, Duplex, Discrete, Aggregative, Segmentative, Componential, Coherent, Composite, Multiform) describe the physical similarity and relationship between the members of a set, e.g. trees may occur in a collection of the same species, of different species, or even in a patternless collection with plants that are not trees.

Affiliation

The four affiliations (Consolidative, Associative, Variative, Coalescent) describe the subjective purpose or function of members of a set, e.g. a group of trees may occur naturally and have no purpose, they may have the same purpose, complementary purposes, or different purposes.

Perspective

The four perspectives (Monadic, Unbounded, Nomic, Abstract) describe the boundedness of a set, i.e. if it is viewed as a single unit, multiple disconnected units, viewed generically, or its characteristics considered abstractly.

Extension

The six extensions (Delimitive, Proximal, Inceptive, Terminative, Graduative, Depletive) describe the referred part of a set, e.g. its beginning or its end.

Essence

The two essences (Normal, Representative) describe whether the referred set is in the real world or exists solely psychologically.

Context

The four contexts (Existential, Functional, Representational, Amalgamate) describe the psychological relevance of the set, e.g. merely its existence or the set as symbolic for something else.

Designation

The two designations (Informal, Formal) describe the authority or permanence of a set.

Version

The six versions (Processual, Completive, Ineffectual, Incompletive, Positive, Effective) describe whether the action is goal-oriented or not, and whether the action is successfully completed.

Register

The five registers (Narrative, Discursive, Parenthetical, Cogitant, Impressionistic) describe the mode of personal communication (narration, personal cogitation, subjective impression, direct speech, parenthetical “aside”).

Cases

There are 96 grammatical cases in Ithkuil, one special case being the vocative, used for direct address. Verbal formatives inflect for case under Frame constructions (i.e., dependent clauses). The grammatical cases of Ithkuil can be divided into several distinct groups: [31]

CategoryIdentifiesAmount
Transrelativethe participants to the verb11
Possessivepossessive relationships between nouns7
Associativenon-possessive relationships between nouns and adverbial relationships with verbs32
Temporaltemporal relationships15
Spatialspatial relationships; this does not cover spatial relationships such as 'to be inside of', which are covered by separate formatives6
Comparisoncomparisons to other nouns, used in conjunction with Level24
Verbal morphology

Several distinct grammatical categories apply only to verbal formatives. These are listed below: [32]

Function

The four functions describe the general relationship that the verbal formative has with its nominal participants (state, action, description). Ithkuil nominal formatives also carry a function, but cannot be inflected for them, always remaining in the "stative". [32]

Mood

The eight moods describe attitudes or perspectives on the act or the degree of factuality.

Illocution

The six illocutions describe the general purpose of the speech act (assertion, question, warning, demand, etc.).

Relation

The two relations describe whether the verbal formative is part of a subordinate clause.

Phase

The nine phases describe the temporal pattern of the act or occurrence.

Sanction

The nine sanctions describe the sort of truthfulness the listener should ascribe to it (assertion, allegation, counterargument, refutation, etc.).

Valence

The fourteen valences describe the manner of participation of two separate entities to the verbal formative.

Validation

The six validations describe the evidence supporting the statement.

Aspect

The 32 aspects describe the temporal relationship of the verbal formative in its context.

Bias

The 24 biases describe the speaker's emotional attitude towards the action.

Suffixes

Ithkuil uses a variety of affixes, termed suffixes, to further delineate what is described by the formative. They come in three types and often correlate with adverbs.

Adjuncts

There are two types of adjuncts in Ithkuil: personal-reference adjuncts and verbal adjuncts. [28] All adjuncts are highly synthetic.

Personal reference adjuncts are akin to pronouns in English. There are two types of personal-reference adjuncts in Ithkuil: Single-referent and dual-referent. [33]

Verbal adjuncts are adjuncts that work in conjunction with verbal formatives to provide information about the latter's Valence, Level, Phase, Sanction, Illocution, Modality, Aspect, and Bias. [28] Of these, Modality and Level can only be indicated using verbal adjuncts, whereas the others can also be expressed on the verbal formative. [34]

Numerical system

Ithkuil uses a base 100 numeral system with roots for the numbers 1 to 10, and a stem-specific derivative suffix used with a number root to add a multiple of 10, providing the numerals up to 99. Ithkuil did not originally use the concept of zero. Numbers greater than 100 are expressed through multiple formatives, and a special numerical script has logograms for the numbers 1 to 100 and exponential powers of 100. On 27 March 2015, Quijada released a mathematical sublanguage using a dozenal number system which uses the circle constant tau. [35]

Writing system

"Tram-mloi hhasmarptuktox" written in the Ithkuil script. English translation: "On the contrary, I think it may turn out that this rugged mountain range trails off at some point" Ithkuil-ex001.jpg
"Tram-mļöi hhâsmařpţuktôx" written in the Ithkuil script. English translation: "On the contrary, I think it may turn out that this rugged mountain range trails off at some point"

Ithkuil uses a morphophonemic script because characters convey both phonetic and morphological information. (Notably, it has no alphabet as such.) Its use is closely tied to Ithkuil's grammatical system, which allows much of the phonological aspect of words to be morpho-syntactically inferred. Those parts of an Ithkuil word whose pronunciation is predictable are not written, whereas the characters used to indicate the pronunciation of the unpredictable parts of a word also convey the grammatical information necessary to reconstruct the implicit phonetics. Words are thus written in a highly abbreviated manner, particularly useful for the highly inflected, occasionally elongated words of the Ithkuil language. The script is also used alphabetically for transliterating foreign words and mathematical expressions. [21]

Ithkuil II (2007)

Ithkuil Ornamental example 2a.jpg
Ithkuil Ornamental monochrome example 2a.svg
Illustration of an alternative artistic writing system for the Ilaksh language. The glyph in this image reads: "En-nà ççwačotëērbïkç ukšëěuh çéitëpš äirei’wuŧ a’läçewöóřzah žie." (English: If only the troupe of clowns had gotten together and destroyed their musical instruments just after performing that lovely recital for us.) [36] [37] The top image shows the colored version of the initial cartouche coloring system design: white, gray, shaded or striped, and black.

The revision of the obsolete Ithkuil language, Ilaksh, was originally going to be written using an experimental writing system in the form of a colored cartouche-like face with a hexagon glyph used as an abstract morphological "map" for Ilaksh sentences. Although the Ilaksh writing system holds the same morpho-phonological principles as its sister languages, it is the most distinctive because it has minimal phonologycal information, making it an almost pure morpholography writing system. [37] [38] Although the Ilaksh language eventually became obsolete and was discarded, this writing system was still wanted to be adapted into Ithkuil by its creators to be used as an alternative artistic writing system. [39] [36] In addition, Ilaksh also has a secondary writing system in the form of cursive (e.g. handwriting forme) which is derived from the main writing system itself. This cursive system is usually written in a top-down direction. There is also a variant with a horizontal direction which is usually used to write short sentences or couplets that can be written in one line only. [37]

Cartouche-like face

Ilaksh word roots are symbolized by cartouche shapes which will be the foundation of the glyph-like symbol placed above them. In addition, the type of the root can also be determined from the color and shape of the side of the cartouche itself. The formative of the root is determined by the direction of the cartouche itself (e.g., when a root is written using a horizontal direction, it has a nominal formative). [37]

There are 30 sisian shapes used in the cartouche-cartouche with the shoot direction facing left (upper table) and right (lower table). The left-facing shoot is considered the "default" shape for each side. [37]

Leftside-cartouche-edges.jpg
Cartouche with left-facing edge
Rightside-cartouche-edges.jpg
Cartouche with right-facing edge

The cartouche in the Ilaksh writing system consists of four different colors (black, white, gray, shaded or striped) and each of them contains 30 side shapes. There are total of 120 glyph combination available, denoting CR consonantal structure. The 30 form of edge derived from the combination of 5 VR vowel phoneme and 6 tone. [37] [40] To distinguish between the phonological elements represented by the sisian shapes, consonantal elements have left-facing (or top) tops, while vowel and tone elements have right-facing (or bottom) tops. [37]

List of 120 CR consonantal combination
Edge
Color
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
Whiteptkbdgfŧxvđsšzžmnňrlcčżjpytykybydygy
Grayfyŧyvyđymynyrylyřçppftfkfbvdvgvpsksbzgzsfšfšŧ
Shadedpltlklbldlglflŧlxlvlđlslšlzlžlmlnlsxšxçtprtrkrbrdrgrfrŧrxrvr
Blackđrsršrzržrmrnrpmpnçkspstskšpštšksmšmsnšntmtnkmkn
Combination of VR – tone
Tone
VR
LowHighFallingRisingFall-risingRise-falling
a1611162126
e2712172227
i3813182328
o4914192429
u51015202530
Case function

The basic shape (hexagon) of the glyph undergoes a shape change when it represents a case of Ilaksh. The forms are divided into 96 modified forms that represent 96 grammatical cases in the morphological structure of Ilaksh, so that one form represents only one grammatical case. [37] [41] Case modification only occurs on the left half of the first glyph in a cartouche face. [37] The following are the 96 left hemisphere modified forms of the first glyph in the cartouche. The number written above each glyph is the description of the case element it represents.

Ilaksh first righthand glif.svg
LabelGlyphCase
OBL1Oblique
IND2Indusive
ABS3Absolutive
ERG4Ergative
EFF5Effectuative
AFF6Affective
DAT7Dative
INS8Instrumental
ACT9Active
DER10Derivative
SIT11Situative
POS12Possessive
PRP13Proprietive
GEN14Genitive
ATT15Atributive
PDC16Produktive
ITP17Interpretive
OGN18Originative
PAR19Partitive
CRS20Kontrastive
CPS21Compositive
PRD22Predikative
MED23Mediative
APL24Applicative
LabelGlyphCase
PUR25Purposive
CSD26Considerative
ESS27Essive
ASI28Assimilative
FUN29Functive
TFM30Transformative
REF31Referential
CLA32Classificative
CNV33Conductive
IDP34Interdependent
BEN35Benefactive
TSP36Transpositive
CMM37Commutative
COM38Commitative
CNJ39Conjunctive
UTL40Utilitative
ABE41Abesive
CVS42Conversive
COR43Correlative
DEP44Dependent
PVS45Provisional
PTL46Postulative
DFR47Deferential
CON48Concecive
LabelGlyphKasus
EXC49Exceptive
AVR50Aversive
CMP51Comparative
SML52Simultanitive
ASS53Assesive
CNR54Concursive
ACS55Accessive
DFF56Diffusive
PER57Periodical
PRO58Prolapsive
PCV59Precursive
PCR60Postcursive
ELP61Elapsive
ALP62Alapsive
INP63Interpolative
EPS64Episodic
PRL65Prolimitive
LIM66Limitative
LOC67Locative
ORI68Orientative
PSV69Procursive
ALL70Alatid
ABL71Ablative
NAV72Navigative
LabelCaseGlyph
CMP1AComparative 1A73
CMP2AComparative 2A74
CMP3AComparative 3A75
CMP4AComparative 4A76
CMP5AComparative 5A77
CMP6AComparative 6A78
CMP7AComparative 7A79
CMP8AComparative 8A80
CMP1BComparative 1B81
CMP2BComparative 2B82
CMP3bComparative 3B83
CMP4BComparative 4B84
CMP5BComparative 5B85
CMP6BComparative 6B86
CMP7BComparative 7B87
CMP8BComparative 8B88
CMP1CComparative 1C89
CMP2CComparative 2C90
CMP3CComparative 3C91
CMP4CComparative 4C92
CMP5CComparative 5C93
CMP6CComparative 6C94
CMP7CKomparatif 7C95
CMP8CComparative 8C96

Related Research Articles

Sandhi is any of a wide variety of sound changes that occur at morpheme or word boundaries. Examples include fusion of sounds across word boundaries and the alteration of one sound depending on nearby sounds or the grammatical function of the adjacent words. Sandhi belongs to morphophonology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Madí language</span> Arawan language spoken in Brazil

Madí—also known as Jamamadí after one of its dialects, and also Kapaná or Kanamanti (Canamanti)—is an Arawan language spoken by about 1,000 Jamamadi, Banawá, and Jarawara people scattered over Amazonas, Brazil.

Morphological typology is a way of classifying the languages of the world that groups languages according to their common morphological structures. The field organizes languages on the basis of how those languages form words by combining morphemes. Analytic languages contain very little inflection, instead relying on features like word order and auxiliary words to convey meaning. Synthetic languages, ones that are not analytic, are divided into two categories: agglutinative and fusional languages. Agglutinative languages rely primarily on discrete particles for inflection, while fusional languages "fuse" inflectional categories together, often allowing one word ending to contain several categories, such that the original root can be difficult to extract. A further subcategory of agglutinative languages are polysynthetic languages, which take agglutination to a higher level by constructing entire sentences, including nouns, as one word.

In phonetics and phonology, gemination, or consonant lengthening, is an articulation of a consonant for a longer period of time than that of a singleton consonant. It is distinct from stress. Gemination is represented in many writing systems by a doubled letter and is often perceived as a doubling of the consonant. Some phonological theories use 'doubling' as a synonym for gemination, while others describe two distinct phenomena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iñupiaq language</span> Group of dialects of the Inuit language

Iñupiaq or Inupiaq, also known as Iñupiat, Inupiat, Iñupiatun or Alaskan Inuit, is an Inuit language, or perhaps group of languages, spoken by the Iñupiat people in northern and northwestern Alaska, as well as a small adjacent part of the Northwest Territories of Canada. The Iñupiat language is a member of the Inuit-Yupik-Unangan language family, and is closely related and, to varying degrees, mutually intelligible with other Inuit languages of Canada and Greenland. There are roughly 2,000 speakers. Iñupiaq is considered to be a threatened language, with most speakers at or above the age of 40. Iñupiaq is an official language of the State of Alaska, along with several other indigenous languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Choctaw language</span> Muskogean language spoken in US

The Choctaw language, spoken by the Choctaw, an Indigenous people of the Southeastern Woodlands, US, is a member of the Muskogean language family. Chickasaw is a separate but closely related language to Choctaw.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tzeltal language</span> Mayan language of Mexico

Tzeltal or Tseltal is a Mayan language spoken in the Mexican state of Chiapas, mostly in the municipalities of Ocosingo, Altamirano, Huixtán, Tenejapa, Yajalón, Chanal, Sitalá, Amatenango del Valle, Socoltenango, Las Rosas, Chilón, San Juan Cancuc, San Cristóbal de las Casas and Oxchuc. Tzeltal is one of many Mayan languages spoken near this eastern region of Chiapas, including Tzotzil, Chʼol, and Tojolabʼal, among others. There is also a small Tzeltal diaspora in other parts of Mexico and the United States, primarily as a result of unfavorable economic conditions in Chiapas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tzotzil language</span> Mayan language spoken in Mexico

Tzotzil is a Maya language spoken by the Indigenous Tzotzil Maya people in the Mexican state of Chiapas. Some speakers may be somewhat bilingual in Spanish, but many are monolingual Tzotzil speakers. In Central Chiapas, some primary schools and a secondary school are taught in Tzotzil. Tzeltal is the most closely related language to Tzotzil and together they form a Tzeltalan sub-branch of the Mayan language family. Tzeltal, Tzotzil and Chʼol are the most widely spoken languages in Chiapas besides Spanish.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Word</span> Basic element of language

A word is a basic element of language that carries meaning, can be used on its own, and is uninterruptible. Despite the fact that language speakers often have an intuitive grasp of what a word is, there is no consensus among linguists on its definition and numerous attempts to find specific criteria of the concept remain controversial. Different standards have been proposed, depending on the theoretical background and descriptive context; these do not converge on a single definition. Some specific definitions of the term "word" are employed to convey its different meanings at different levels of description, for example based on phonological, grammatical or orthographic basis. Others suggest that the concept is simply a convention used in everyday situations.

Old Irish, also called Old Gaelic, is the oldest form of the Goidelic/Gaelic language for which there are extensive written texts. It was used from c. 600 to c. 900. The main contemporary texts are dated c. 700–850; by 900 the language had already transitioned into early Middle Irish. Some Old Irish texts date from the 10th century, although these are presumably copies of texts written at an earlier time. Old Irish is thus forebear to Modern Irish, Manx and Scottish Gaelic.

In linguistics, apophony is an alternation of vowel (quality) within a word that indicates grammatical information.

Chaha or Cheha is a Sebat bet Gurage dialect spoken in central Ethiopia, mainly within the Gurage Zone in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region. It is also spoken by Gurage settlers in Ethiopian cities, especially Addis Ababa. Chaha is known to many phonologists and morphologists for its very complex morphophonology.

Tübatulabal is an Uto-Aztecan language, traditionally spoken in Kern County, California, United States. It is the traditional language of the Tübatulabal, who still speak the traditional language in addition to English. The language originally had three main dialects: Bakalanchi, Pakanapul and Palegawan.

The grammar of the Sanskrit language has a complex verbal system, rich nominal declension, and extensive use of compound nouns. It was studied and codified by Sanskrit grammarians from the later Vedic period, culminating in the Pāṇinian grammar of the 4th century BCE.

The Awngi language, in older publications also called Awiya, is a endangered indigenous Central Cushitic language spoken by the Awi people, traditionally living in Central Gojjam in northwestern Ethiopia.

Central Alaskan Yupʼik is one of the languages of the Yupik family, in turn a member of the Eskimo–Aleut language group, spoken in western and southwestern Alaska. Both in ethnic population and in number of speakers, the Central Alaskan Yupik people form the largest group among Alaska Natives. As of 2010 Yupʼik was, after Navajo, the second most spoken aboriginal language in the United States. Yupʼik should not be confused with the related language Central Siberian Yupik spoken in Chukotka and St. Lawrence Island, nor Naukan Yupik likewise spoken in Chukotka.

This article presents a brief overview of the grammar of the Sesotho and provides links to more detailed articles.

Derived stems are a morphological feature of verbs common to the Semitic languages. These derived verb stems are sometimes called augmentations or forms of the verb, or are identified by their Hebrew name binyan, and sometimes correspond with additional semantic meaning such as passive or causative action.

Consonant gradation is the term used for a systematic set of alternations which are widespread in Finnish grammar. These alternations are a form of synchronic lenition. They occur also in other Finnic and Uralic languages; see consonant gradation for a more general overview.

This article discusses the phonological system of the Greenlandic language.

References

  1. Foer, Joshua (December 16, 2012). "Utopian for Beginners: An amateur linguist loses control of the language he invented.". The New Yorker . Retrieved February 27, 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quijada, John (2004–2019). "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Introduction". ithkuil.net. Retrieved February 27, 2022.
  3. 1 2 Quijada, John (2004–2019). "Ithkuil FAQs". ithkuil.net. Retrieved February 27, 2022.
  4. Quijada, John (June 26, 2019). "Newest Update" (PDF). Ithkuil.net. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-09-03.
  5. Quijada, John (October 3, 2020). "Morphophonology Version 0.15" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 27, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021.
  6. Quijada, John (March 4, 2021). "Morphophonology Version 0.15.8.1" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 27, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021.
  7. Quijada, John (2023). "A GRAMMAR OF NEW ITHKUIL". Archived from the original on 21 February 2023. Retrieved 24 February 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 Козловский, Станислав (29 July 2004). "Скорость мысли". Компьютерра (in Russian). Archived from the original on 13 May 2016. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
  9. Mikhail Gertelman (2009). "Ithkuil and its philosophical design" (PDF). Computerra (in Russian). Vol. 17, no. 781. p. 12.
  10. Peterson, David J. (August 3, 2018). "The 2008 Smiley Award Winner: Ithkuil". The Smiley Award. Retrieved February 27, 2022.
  11. ebvalaim (January 14, 2016). "Making fun with Ithkuil easier". ebvalaim.log. Retrieved October 27, 2023.
  12. "Transcription of Ithkuil". laethiel.fr. n.d. Retrieved February 27, 2022.
  13. "John Quijada". YouTube . Retrieved February 27, 2022.
  14. "Ithkuil — Why the hell are there four Ithkuils?!". ithkuil.place. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
  15. 1 2 3 "FAQs". www.ithkuil.net.
  16. 1 2 3 Foer, Joshua (16 December 2012). "Utopian for beginners". The New Yorker. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
  17. 1 2 3 Prouillac, Nicolas (15 September 2015). "Peut-on tout dire avec la langue la plus concise du monde ?". www.ulyes.co (in French). Retrieved 27 April 2023.
  18. "Ilaksh script diagram (indicates what the various parts of an Ilaksh logogram indicate)". Archived from the original on June 5, 2011.
  19. "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 11: The Writing System". ithkuil.net.
  20. "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 11: The Script". 2009-05-22. Archived from the original on 2009-05-22. Retrieved 2018-08-10.
  21. 1 2 "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 11: The Writing System". www.ithkuil.net.
  22. "Ithkuil for Beginners. A Hypothetical Lesson • Aitôxhalin Açnalüpç". Aitôxhalin Açnalüpç on Svbtle. 19 August 2014.
  23. "r/Ithkuil - A (LONG) MESSAGE FROM JOHN Q ABOUT A FUTURE REFORM OF ITHKUIL". reddit. 22 August 2016. Retrieved 2019-05-03.
  24. "Ithkuil Update". ithkuil.net. Archived from the original on 2019-10-29. Retrieved 2019-05-03.
  25. "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Introduction".
  26. Ahearn, Laura (6 May 2011), Living language: an introduction to linguistic anthropology (1. publ. ed.), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 69, ISBN   9781405124416
  27. 1 2 "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 1: Phonology". www.ithkuil.net.
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 2: Morpho-Phonology". ithkuil.net.
  29. "Lexicon". www.ithkuil.net.
  30. 1 2 "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 3: Basic Morphology". www.ithkuil.net.
  31. "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 4: Case Morphology". www.ithkuil.net.
  32. 1 2 "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 5: Verb Morphology". www.ithkuil.net.
  33. "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 8: Adjuncts". www.ithkuil.net.
  34. "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 6: More Verb Morphology". www.ithkuil.net.
  35. "Expressing mathematics and measurement in Ithkuil" (PDF).
  36. 1 2 John Quijada (10 June 2007). "Conlang: Introducing Ilaksh (the revision of Ithkuil) (John Quijada, Jun 10 '07, 1:31)". archives.conlang.info. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
  37. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Ilaksh: A Philosophical Design for a Hypothetical Language – The writting system". ithkuil.place. Retrieved 20 March 2023.
  38. "Ilaksh: A Philosophical Design for a Hypothetical Language – Introduction". Ithkuil.place. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  39. John Quijada. "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language - Chapter 11: The Writing System". ithkuil.net. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  40. "Ilaksh: A Philosophical Design for a Hypothetical Language – Morphophonology". ithkuil.place. Retrieved 21 March 2023.
  41. "Ilaksh: A Philosophical Design for a Hypothetical Language – Case Morphology". ithkuil.place. Retrieved 27 March 2023.