Latgalian phonology

Last updated

Latgalian language is considered a Latvian language dialect by the Latvian government, others argue that it is an independent language.

Contents

Vowels

Vowel phonemes of Latgalian [1]
Front Central Back
short long shortlongshortlong
Close i i ī( ɨ ) y u u ū
Mid ɛ e( ɛː ) ē ɔ o( ɔː ) ō
Open æ e æː ē a a ā
Diphthongs  

Consonants

Consonant phonemes of Latgalian [5]
Labial [a] Dental/
Alveolar
Postalveolar/
Palatal
Velar
hardsofthardsofthardsoft [b] hardsoft
Nasal m n
Stop voiceless p t k
voiced b d ɡ ɡʲ
Affricate voiceless t͡s t͡sʲ t͡ʃ ( t͡ɕ )
voiced d͡z d͡zʲ d͡ʒ ( d͡ʑ )
Fricative voiceless( f ) [c] s ʃ ( ɕ )( x ) [d]
voiced v [e] [e] z ʒ ( ʑ )
Approximant l ɪ̯() [f] ʊ̯ [g] () [g] [f]
Trill r ()
  1. /m,mʲ,p,pʲ,b,bʲ/ are bilabial, whereas /f,v,vʲ/ are labiodental.
  2. The alveolo-palatals occur only in some non-standard dialects, with the fricatives /ɕ,ʑ/ being more common than the affricates /t͡ɕ,d͡ʑ/. [6]
  3. /f/ occurs only in some loanwords, such as ortografejatransl.orthography. In other loanwords, it is replaced by /p/, as in kopejstransl.coffee. [7]
  4. /x/ occurs only in some loanwords, such as tehnologejatransl.technology. In other loanwords, it is replaced by /k/, as in kokejstransl.hockey. [7]
  5. 1 2 /v,vʲ/ are traditionally classified as approximants [ʋ,ʋʲ] which phonetically may be fricatives [v,vʲ]. [7]
  6. 1 2 For the approximants /ɪ̯/ and /ʊ̯/ the contrast between their hard and soft versions is phonetically realized as a contrast between retraction and advancement. The "soft" counterparts of /ɪ̯/ and /ʊ̯/ are /i̯/ and /u̯/. [8] [9] Brejdak (2006, p. 198-199) considers those to have phonemic status and argues that the contrast between them and the plain /ɪ̯/ and /ʊ̯/ corresponds to the soft/hard contrast. However, Nau (2011, p. 13) considers the phonemic status of /u̯/ and especially /i̯/ (which he transcribes with a non-IPA symbol ) as questionable. If the difference is considered to be allophonic, the resulting single palatal approximant can be transcribed with j and the corresponding labio-velar with w. In this article, the difference is assumed to be phonemic.
  7. 1 2 /ʊ̯,u̯/ are labial-velar. [9]

Accent

Stress

The stress is most often on the first syllable. [9]

Tonal accents

There are two phonemic tonal accents in Latgalian, which appear only on long syllables, i.e. those with a long vowel, a diphthong, or a sequence of a short vowel and a sonorant. These are falling (also called level) and broken (also called sharp). However, there are only a handful of minimal (or near-minimal) pairs, such as [rɛ̀ɪ̯tʲ] 'swallow' and [rɛ̂ɪ̯t] 'tomorrow', both written reit. [9]

Phonetically, both of the tonal accents are falling; the falling accent is realized as an even decrease in intensity and pitch, whereas the broken accent is realized as a sudden decrease in intensity and pitch. [9]

Related Research Articles

A diphthong, also known as a gliding vowel or a vowel glide, is a combination of two adjacent vowel sounds within the same syllable. Technically, a diphthong is a vowel with two different targets: that is, the tongue moves during the pronunciation of the vowel. In most varieties of English, the phrase "no highway cowboy" has five distinct diphthongs, one in every syllable.

Upper Sorbian, occasionally referred to as Wendish, is a minority language spoken by Sorbs, in the historical province of Upper Lusatia, which is today part of Saxony, Germany. It is grouped in the West Slavic language branch, together with Lower Sorbian, Czech, Polish, Silesian, Slovak, and Kashubian.

The phonology of Portuguese varies among dialects, in extreme cases leading to some difficulties in mutual intelligibility. This article on phonology focuses on the pronunciations that are generally regarded as standard. Since Portuguese is a pluricentric language, and differences between European Portuguese (EP), Brazilian Portuguese (BP), and Angolan Portuguese (AP) can be considerable, varieties are distinguished whenever necessary.

English phonology is the system of speech sounds used in spoken English. Like many other languages, English has wide variation in pronunciation, both historically and from dialect to dialect. In general, however, the regional dialects of English share a largely similar phonological system. Among other things, most dialects have vowel reduction in unstressed syllables and a complex set of phonological features that distinguish fortis and lenis consonants.

Most dialects of modern English have two close back vowels: the near-close near-back rounded vowel found in words like foot, and the close back rounded vowel found in words like goose. The STRUT vowel, which historically was back, is often central as well. This article discusses the history of these vowels in various dialects of English, focusing in particular on phonemic splits and mergers involving these sounds.

Bernese German, like other High Alemannic varieties, has a two-way contrast in plosives and fricatives that is not based on voicing, but on length. The absence of voice in plosives and fricatives is typical for all High German varieties, but many of them have no two-way contrast due to general lenition.

The phonology of the Persian language varies between regional dialects, standard varieties, and even from older varieties of Persian. Persian is a pluricentric language and countries that have Persian as an official language have separate standard varieties, namely: Standard Dari (Afghanistan), Standard Iranian Persian (Iran) and Standard Tajik (Tajikistan). The most significant differences between standard varieties of Persian are their vowel systems. Standard varieties of Persian have anywhere from 6 to 8 vowel distinctions, and similar vowels may be pronounced differently between standards. However, there are not many notable differences when comparing consonants, as all standard varieties have a similar number of consonant sounds. Though, colloquial varieties generally have more differences than their standard counterparts. Most dialects feature contrastive stress and syllable-final consonant clusters. Linguists tend to focus on Iranian Persian, so this article may contain less adequate information regarding other varieties.

There is significant phonological variation among the various Yiddish dialects. The description that follows is of a modern Standard Yiddish that was devised during the early 20th century and is frequently encountered in pedagogical contexts.

Dutch phonology is similar to that of other West Germanic languages, especially Afrikaans and West Frisian.

The phonological system of the Hawaiian language is based on documentation from those who developed the Hawaiian alphabet during the 1820s as well as scholarly research conducted by lexicographers and linguists from 1949 to present.

The phonology of Bengali, like that of its neighbouring Eastern Indo-Aryan languages, is characterised by a wide variety of diphthongs and inherent back vowels.

Unlike many languages, Icelandic has only very minor dialectal differences in sounds. The language has both monophthongs and diphthongs, and many consonants can be voiced or unvoiced.

Lithuanian has 11 vowels and 45 consonants, including 22 pairs of consonants distinguished by the presence or absence of palatalization. Most vowels come in pairs which are differentiated through length and degree of centralization.

This article is about the phonology of Latvian. It deals with synchronic phonology as well as phonetics.

This article is about the phonology and phonetics of the Slovak language.

Afrikaans has a similar phonology to other West Germanic languages, especially Dutch.

This article aims to describe the phonology and phonetics of central Luxembourgish, which is regarded as the emerging standard.

This article covers the phonology of the Orsmaal-Gussenhoven dialect, a variety of Getelands spoken in Orsmaal-Gussenhoven, a village in the Linter municipality.

This article covers the phonology of the Kerkrade dialect, a West Ripuarian language variety spoken in parts of the Kerkrade municipality in the Netherlands and Herzogenrath in Germany.

The phonology of the Maastrichtian dialect, especially with regards to vowels is quite extensive due to the dialect's tonal nature.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Nau (2011), p. 9.
  2. Nau (2011), pp. 9–10.
  3. Nau (2011), p. 10.
  4. Nau (2011), pp. 9–11.
  5. Nau (2011), pp. 11–13.
  6. Nau (2011), p. 11.
  7. 1 2 3 Nau (2011), p. 12.
  8. Brejdak (2006), p. 198-199.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Nau (2011), p. 13.

Bibliography