Jita is a Bantu language of Tanzania, spoken on the southeastern shore of Lake Victoria/Nyanza and on the island of Ukerewe.
Jita | |
---|---|
Ecijita | |
Native to | Tanzania |
Region | Mara Region |
Ethnicity | Jita people |
Native speakers | 210,000 (2005) [1] |
Niger–Congo?
| |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | jit |
Glottolog | jita1239 |
JE.25 [2] |
Guthrie (1967) classifies Jita in Bantu Zone E, Group 20 because, like other languages in this zone, it has double prefixes (preprefixes or augments [3] ) on nouns, an “unparalleled wealth” of verb tenses and true negative tenses with a distinctive negative prefix. More recent work (Bastin 2003, Maho 2009) classifies Jita as part of an Interlacustrine Bantu group (Zone J). More specifically, Jita is a member of the Suguti Bantu group, with the Guthrie code JE.25.
Kwaya (KYA, JE.251); Kara (REG), Regi/Leki (both JE.252); and Ruri/Rori (JE.253) are closely related to Jita. While Glottolog considers Ruri a dialect of Kwaya, [4] Massamba's (1977) comparative study of Jita, Ruri and Kwaya suggests that Ruri is quite similar to Jita, while both Jita and Ruri show a number of differences from Kwaya.
Jita has the five vowel system - plus length contrasts - illustrated in the table below.
Front | Central | Back | |
Close | i iː | u uː | |
Mid | e eː | o oː | |
Open | a aː |
As in many Bantu languages, vowel height harmony (VHH) affects the quality of vowels in verbal suffixes, so that only the root-initial vowel of verbs contrasts for vowel quality. Vowel length is neutralized following consonant-glide sequences and preceding NC sequences, where only long vowels are found due to a process known in the Bantu literature as compensatory lengthening. (See Downing 1990, 1996 and the Jita Orthography Statement [5] for illustrations of these processes from Jita; see Hyman 1999 and Odden 2015 [6] for general discussions of these phonological processes.)
Jita has the following IPA consonant phonemes.
Labial | Labio-velar | Alveolar | Alveo-palatal | Velar | Guttural | |||
Plosive | voiceless | p | t | k | ||||
voiced | d | g | ||||||
Fricative | voiceless | f | s | ʃ | h | |||
voiced | β | v | z | |||||
Affricate | voiceless | ʧ | ||||||
voiced | ʤ | |||||||
Nasal | m | n | ɲ | ŋ | ||||
Liquid | l/r | |||||||
Trill | ||||||||
Approximant | w | j |
The Jita Orthography Statement [5] notes that [p] and [d] are mostly found in borrowed words. There seems to be considerable variation in the realization of the liquid phoneme. Downing (1990, 1996) says that the liquid is variably realized as [l] or [r] and chooses [l] as the phoneme, since it seems to be the variant most consistently attested in root (morpheme) initial position. Van der Weken (2002) notes variation between [l] and a retroflex lateral [ɭ], rather than a trill [r]. The Jita Orthography Statement [5] lists [r] as the phoneme and doesn't mention variation in its realization.
Like most Bantu languages, Jita is tonal. A detailed analysis of the Jita tone system has been made by Downing (1990), (1996), and (2014), as well as Rolle (2018). [7] Work like Downing (2011), Kisseberth & Odden (2003), Marlo (2013) and Philippson (1991) put Jita tonal processes in a wider Bantu perspective.
Nouns in Jita, which also include infinitives, have the following morphological structure: Preprefix (PP) - Class Agreement Prefix (CP) - Stem. Below is a chart of nominal agreement prefixes. Note that the IPA alphabet is used in all chart in this article; see the Jita Orthography Statement [5] for Jita orthography equivalents. Note that N indicates a nasal that assimilates in place to a following consonant:
Class | PP | CP | Example | Gloss |
1 | o | mu | omu nu | person |
2 | a | βa | aβa nu | people |
3 | o | mu | omu fuko | bag |
4 | e | mi | emi fuko | bags |
5 | (e) | li | li naʤi | coconut palm |
6 | a | ma | ama naʤi | coconut palms |
7 | e | ʧi | eʧi nu | thing |
8 | e | βi | eβi nu | things |
9 | i:(N) | i:m beʤo | adze | |
10 | ji:(N) | ji:m beʤo | adzes | |
11 | o | lu | olu góje | eyelash (Cl. 10 plural) |
12 | a | ka | aka góje | string |
13 | o | tu | otu góje | strings |
14 | o | βu | oβu néne | bigness (no pl.) |
15 | o | ku | oku té:ka | to cook (no pl.) |
15a | o | ku | oku βóko | arm (Cl. 6 plural) |
In Class 5, the preprefix only occurs with some vowel-initial or monosyllabic roots. In all other classes, the preprefix occurs with all nouns. Nominal modifiers follow the noun. The preprefix and class agreement prefixes also occur on adjectives. Non-adjectival modifiers take a different set of agreement prefixes, which lack preprefixes:
Class | CP2 |
1 | u |
2 | βa |
3 | gu |
4 | ʤi |
5 | li |
6 | ga |
7 | ʧi |
8 | βi |
9 | i |
10 | ʤi |
11 | lu |
12 | ka |
13 | tu |
14 | βu |
15, 15a | ku |
The morphological structure for verbs is:
Subject Prefix (SP) - (Negative Prefix-) Tense/ Aspect Marker (TAM) - ( Object Prefixes (OP)-) Root - (Derivational Suffixes-) (Tense Marker (TAM)-) Final Vowel.
The Root plus following suffixes comprises the Stem; this grouping plus object prefixes comprises the Macro-Stem. Jita is one of the Bantu languages which allow two object prefixes to occur before the Stem.
Subject and object prefixes for verbs are identical to the CP2 prefixes listed above, except for Class 1. The first, second and third (Classes 1 and 2) person singular and plural subject and object agreement prefixes for verbs are as follows:
SP / OP (singular) | SP / OP (plural) | |||
I | ni ~ N / N | we | ʧi / ʧi | |
you | u / ku | you pl. | mu / βa | |
s/he (Cl.1) | a / mu | they (Cl.2) | βa / βa | |
-self (reflexive OP, singular and plural) | i |
Derivational suffixes in Jita, as in other Bantu languages, change the argument structure of the verb to express grammatical notions such as causative, benefactive, locative, reciprocal, reversive and passive. Below are listed some common derivational verbal suffixes (extensions) in Jita. Note that some extensions have two contextually determined forms due to vowel height harmony, mentioned above.
-(is)j- / -(es)j- | causative |
-ir- / -er- | Benefactive; locative |
-an- | reciprocal |
-urur- / -oror- | reversive |
The extended form of some Jita Infinitives is found in the table below (oku- is the infinitive prefix; an acute accent on a vowel indicates High tone):
oku-má:m-a | to sleep; lie down |
oku-ma:m-ír-a | to sleep somewhere (applied) |
oku-má:m-j-a | to make lie down (causative) |
oku-βwí:r-a | to tell |
oku-βwi:r-án-a | to tell each other (reciprocal) |
oku-ʤí:ng-a | to wind |
oku-ʤi:ng-úrur-a | to unwind (reversive) |
As noted by Guthrie (1967), Jita has a "wealth" of verb tense/aspect/mood (TAM) paradigms. Downing (1990, 1996, 2014) and Odom & Robinson (2016) provide comprehensive lists of the paradigms. Note, however, that Odom & Robinson (2016) do not mark tone, even though the melodic tone patterns assigned to each pattern are a crucial part of the expression of TAM. (See Odden & Bickmore 2014 for an overview of the properties of Bantu melodic tone.) Below is the Appendix from Downing (2014), providing an overview of the melodic tone patterns assigned to frequently used TAMs in Jita. Note that not only the TAM but also the negative prefix, as well as relative verb forms, can determine the melodic tone pattern:
Inflection | Tone pattern |
Infinitive | non-melodic |
Distant Past I | melodic – penult H |
Negative | melodic – penult H |
Relative | melodic – penult H |
Distant Past II | melodic – final H |
Negative | melodic – final H |
Relative | melodic – final H |
Perfective | non-melodic |
Yesterday Past | non-melodic |
Negative | non-melodic |
Relative | non-melodic |
Today Past | non-melodic |
Negative | non-melodic |
Relative | melodic – final H |
Present Continuous | melodic – ‘chaotic’ |
Negative | non-melodic |
Distant Future | melodic – final H |
Negative | non-melodic |
Relative | melodic – final H |
Imperative | melodic – ‘chaotic’ |
Subjunctive | melodic – ‘chaotic’ |
When no consistent melodic tone pattern could be determined for a paradigm, Downing labeled the pattern "chaotic." Rolle (2018) develops an analysis of Jita melodic tone which finds a pattern even in the "chaotic" paradigms
Ganda or Luganda is a Bantu language spoken in the African Great Lakes region. It is one of the major languages in Uganda and is spoken by more than 5.56 million Baganda and other people principally in central Uganda, including the capital Kampala of Uganda. Typologically, it is an agglutinative, tonal language with subject–verb–object word order and nominative–accusative morphosyntactic alignment.
The Cheyenne language, is the Native American language spoken by the Cheyenne people, predominantly in present-day Montana and Oklahoma, in the United States. It is part of the Algonquian language family. Like all other Algonquian languages, it has complex agglutinative polysynthetic morphology. This language is considered endangered, at different levels, in both states.
Kinyarwanda, Rwandan or Rwanda, officially known as Ikinyarwanda, is a Bantu language and the national language of Rwanda. It is a dialect of the Rwanda-Rundi language that is also spoken in Burundi and adjacent parts of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda and Tanzania. Kinyarwanda is universal among the native population of Rwanda and is mutually intelligible with Kirundi, the national language of neighbouring Burundi. Kinyabwishya and Kinyamulenge are mutually intelligible dialects spoken in the North Kivu and South Kivu provinces of neighbouring DR Congo.
KhweKWAY is a dialect continuum of the Khoe family of Namibia, Angola, Botswana, South Africa, and parts of Zambia, with some 8,000 speakers.
Bench is a Northern Omotic language of the "Gimojan" subgroup, spoken by about 174,000 people in the Bench Maji Zone of the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region, in southern Ethiopia, around the towns of Mizan Teferi and Shewa Gimira. In a 2006 dissertation, Christian Rapold described three varieties of Bench as "...mutually intelligible...varieties of one and the same language". Bench is the ancestral language of the Bench people.
Keres, also Keresan, is a Native American language, spoken by the Keres Pueblo people in New Mexico. Depending on the analysis, Keres is considered a small language family or a language isolate with several dialects. The varieties of each of the seven Keres pueblos are mutually intelligible with its closest neighbors. There are significant differences between the Western and Eastern groups, which are sometimes counted as separate languages.
Phuthi (Síphùthì) is a Nguni Bantu language spoken in southern Lesotho and areas in South Africa adjacent to the same border. The closest substantial living relative of Phuthi is Swati, spoken in Eswatini and the Mpumalanga province of South Africa. Although there is no contemporary sociocultural or political contact, Phuthi is linguistically part of a historic dialect continuum with Swati. Phuthi is heavily influenced by the surrounding Sesotho and Xhosa languages, but retains a distinct core of lexicon and grammar not found in either Xhosa or Sesotho, and found only partly in Swati to the north.
Tooro or Rutooro is a Bantu language spoken mainly by the Tooro people (Abatooro) from the Tooro Kingdom in western Uganda. There are three main areas where Tooro as a language is mainly used: Kabarole District, Kyenjojo District and Kyegegwa District. Tooro is unique among Bantu languages as it lacks lexical tone. It is most closely related to Runyoro.
Otomi is an Oto-Pamean language spoken by approximately 240,000 indigenous Otomi people in the central altiplano region of Mexico. Otomi consists of several closely related languages, many of which are not mutually intelligible. The word Hñähñu has been proposed as an endonym, but since it represents the usage of a single dialect, it has not gained wide currency. Linguists have classified the modern dialects into three dialect areas: the Northwestern dialects are spoken in Querétaro, Hidalgo and Guanajuato; the Southwestern dialects are spoken in the State of Mexico; and the Eastern dialects are spoken in the highlands of Veracruz, Puebla, and eastern Hidalgo and villages in Tlaxcala and Mexico states.
Sesotho verbs are words in the language that signify the action or state of a substantive, and are brought into agreement with it using the subjectival concord. This definition excludes imperatives and infinitives, which are respectively interjectives and class 14 nouns.
The phonology of Sesotho and those of the other Sotho–Tswana languages are radically different from those of "older" or more "stereotypical" Bantu languages. Modern Sesotho in particular has very mixed origins inheriting many words and idioms from non-Sotho–Tswana languages.
This article presents a brief overview of the grammar of the Sesotho and provides links to more detailed articles.
The orthography of the Sotho language is fairly recent and is based on the Latin script, but, like most languages written using the Latin alphabet, it does not use all the letters; as well, several digraphs and trigraphs are used to represent single sounds.
Yao is a Bantu language in Africa with approximately two million speakers in Malawi, and half a million each in Tanzania and Mozambique. There are also some speakers in Zambia. In Malawi, the main dialect is Mangochi, mostly spoken around Lake Malawi. In Mozambique, the main dialects are Makale and Massaninga. The language has also gone by several other names in English, including chiYao or ciYao, Achawa, Adsawa, Adsoa, Ajawa, Ayawa, Ayo, Ayao, Djao, Haiao, Hiao, Hyao, Jao, Veiao, and waJao.
Sukuma is a Bantu language of Tanzania, spoken in an area southeast of Lake Victoria between Mwanza, Shinyanga, and Lake Eyasi.
Fuliiru, or Kifuliiru, is a Great Lakes Bantu language spoken by the Fuliiru people (Bafuliiru), also known as the Fuliru, who live north and west of the town of Uvira in Uvira Territory, South Kivu Province in the far eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). It is closely related to Kinyindu.
Moro is a Kordofanian language spoken in the Nuba Mountains of South Kordofan, Sudan. It is part of the Western group of West Central Heiban Kordofonian languages and belongs to the Niger-Congo phylum. In 1982 there were an estimated 30,000 Moro-speakers. This was before the second Sudan civil war and therefore the recent number of speakers might differ. There can be noted an influence of Arabic and it is suspected that today approximately a fourth of all Moro vocabulary has a relation or an origin in the Arabic language.
Belanda Bor, or just Bor, is a Luo language of South Sudan. Most speakers also use Belanda Viri, which is a Ubangian language and not at all related.
Mixtepec Mixtec is a Mixtec language that is spoken in the lower Mixteca region. Mixtec language is largely spoken in the area of San Juan Mixtepec, district of Juxtlahuaca, state of Oaxaca. However, the language is also spoken in other areas including Tlaxiaco, San Quintín Baja California, Santa María California, and Oregon. In 2004, it was reported that approximately 12,000 people spoke the Mixtepec Mixtec language. While most speakers of the language refer to it as 'sa'an ntavi' meaning 'language of the poor' or 'poor people's language,' others refer to it as 'sa'an save' which means 'rain language.' It is not closely related to other varieties of Mixtec.
Proto-Bantu is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Bantu languages, a subgroup of the Southern Bantoid languages. It is thought to have originally been spoken in West/Central Africa in the area of what is now Cameroon. About 6,000 years ago, it split off from Proto-Southern Bantoid when the Bantu expansion began to the south and east. Two theories have been put forward about the way the languages expanded: one is that the Bantu-speaking people moved first to the Congo region and then a branch split off and moved to East Africa; the other is that the two groups split from the beginning, one moving to the Congo region, and the other to East Africa.