Noken system

Last updated

The noken system, or ikat system, is a voting practice used in parts of Indonesia's Western New Guinea (Papua) that deviates from standard national electoral practices. The name refers to noken bags, which are widely used in the region and hold cultural value. In areas that use the noken system, voting is carried out by communities, either through public agreement on vote allocation or through the delegation of votes to a tribal leader. There is no law establishing noken voting, but its use has been approved by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia as an expression of customary practices.

Contents

It is unclear when noken voting was first used, but it was established as a formal practice following the approval of the Constitutional Court in 2009. There is no standard process for noken voting. Each polling station establishes a voting process in cooperation with local tribal chiefs and political parties. Broadly, there are two forms of noken voting, namely a "big man" form where a tribal chief votes for all members of their community, and a "hanging noken" system where votes are counted using noken bags that represent different candidates. In all cases, votes are effectively public, and this contrasts with the standard Indonesian electoral practice where individuals mark their candidate choice on a ballot paper.

The use of the noken system is considered to empower voters in the regencies using the system, as they may otherwise be unable to vote due to reasons of literacy, or due to the geographic remoteness of polling stations. The stated cultural justification is that the voting system reflects a tradition of selecting leaders through community consensus or acclamation. However, the system is criticised for its lack of a secret ballot, and for reducing individual choice due to the large influence of tribal chiefs. Noken voting is used in national elections alongside other areas using standard voting, creating strange quirks such as 100% turnout and 100% support for candidates. Areas using the noken system elect fewer women than other areas, and disputes over the results from the system have resulted in court cases and violence.

Name

Noken bags are strongly associated with local cultures in Western New Guinea Noken.jpg
Noken bags are strongly associated with local cultures in Western New Guinea

The voting system is named after traditional noken bags, which are weaved from bark and play an important role in the lives of Papuan communities. [1] [2] The system is also referred to as the ikat system. [3] The term does not refer to a specific practice, instead vaguely encompassing any voting method linked to traditional customs. [4] :4 The importance of noken bags to West Papuan people means they are an effective symbol for the electoral system, reflecting a statement of cultural values, [5] :48–49 even if the actual use of noken bags is tangential. [6]

System

The noken system refers to voting practices that differ from the standard practice used in Indonesian elections. [6] There are no laws or regulations establishing the noken system. [7] Tribal chiefs may cast votes on behalf of their entire communities. In some cases the community votes as one, while in other cases the community agrees on how to divide their votes. [1] The system where votes are delivered by a single tribal chief is known as the bungkus or 'big man' system. [8] [9] :67 In the noken gantung (hanging bag) system, [10] noken bags are directly used as substitute ballot boxes. However, unlike standard ballot boxes, these are public rather than private. Votes are generally placed inside bags representing different candidates as a substitute for marking ballot papers. [2] In some polling stations, votes are taken by headcount rather than by ballots. [11] :80 The noken bags representing candidates are sometimes hung directly around people's necks. [6] The bags are often accompanied by names and pictures of their associated candidates. [11] :80 Sometimes ballots are submitted to electoral officials in a noken bag. [1]

Electoral authorities work with tribal chiefs and political parties to ensure the system functions. [1] Agreements for the use of a particular system are made by agreement at each polling station. [3] While specific practices are diverse, in all variations the system reflects the significant influence of tribal chiefs and lacks a secret ballot. [4] :6Noken bags give the process cultural meaning, and votes are considered collective rather than individual. [5] :51 In many cases, communities will meet prior to the election to discuss the vote, with tribal chiefs responsible for explaining candidate choices. [3]

Usage

Regencies in which the noken system was used in 2019 and prior to 2019 (pink) Papua noken system.svg
Regencies in which the noken system was used in 2019 and prior to 2019 (pink)
Regencies in which the noken system was used in 2024 (grey hatched) 2024 Indonesian presidential election results map by city and regency (alternate colour scheme).svg
Regencies in which the noken system was used in 2024 (grey hatched)

The noken system is used within the two provinces of Western New Guinea in Indonesia, Central Papua and Highland Papua. This region is very mountainous, with difficult terrain separating remote communities. Many residents of these areas are Melanesian and have distinct ethnic and cultural identities. [1] Running elections is further complicated by low literacy rates, which makes even finding poll workers difficult. The number of registered voters often does not match census records, with 2013 electoral rolls in some regencies exceeding 150% of the 2010 census population. [6]

The system is an alternative to direct voting, which usually in Indonesia is expressed through the "coblos" system where ballots are punched to indicate the individual voted for. The coblos system is used in some parts of regencies using the noken system, in particular the urban areas. [1] [3] According to the Constitutional Court, only areas that have previously used the noken system may be allowed to continue to use it, although it has not ruled on which areas qualify. [9] :78

Impacts and implications

The noken system allows votes to be cast even when direct participation in an election would be challenged by literacy or geography. It is sometimes viewed as a transparent system due to votes being open to the local community, as contrasted with opaque ballot boxes. It is defended as an expression of culture [1] that creates a link between tribal governance and electoral politics. [4] :7

However, the system also results in the public individual votes being influenced, especially those of women. [1] Women are less likely to be elected, with noken votes usually controlled by male tribal chiefs. While political parties are required to run a list including female candidates, women in areas using the noken system may not even be able to vote for themselves. [12] Tribal and customary borders may not align with formal administrative borders, creating uncertainty over who a tribal chief represents. [9] :73

The reliance on unmarked ballots opens the system up to potential electoral fraud. [2] Tribal chiefs may not accurately reflect their communities. [9] :79 Even when votes are individual, unused votes might be appropriated by tribal chiefs. [13] Candidates have disputed the results at times, and the areas involved are more prone to electoral violence than elsewhere in the country, with 71 electoral violence-related deaths recorded from 2009 to 2017. It is thought the noken system contributes to electoral disputes. [3] [9] :68

Candidates can make agreements as to the number of votes they will receive through noken votes, facilitating block voting. In 2012, each subdistrict in Nduga Regency was provided the same number of ballot papers under a local agreement to ensure each had an equal impact on the electoral result, regardless of the actual number of people within each subdistrict. [6] Leaders from different villages may meet to discuss what the eventual electoral results will be. A supported candidate may receive 100% of the votes, while if there is no popular candidate, the votes might be split evenly. [14] Agreements on how to divide votes have been disputed, with miscommunications leading to violence. [5] :49–50

The noken system produces odd electoral results, such as turnouts reaching 100% and candidates receiving 100% of votes. [9] :80 [15] :4 [4] :5 This provides a structural advantage to areas using the noken system, and thus to candidates with support in those areas. [13]

History

It is unclear what the historical basis of the noken system is, when it was first used, or in what form. [5] :50–51 While it is possible that there may be precedents for the noken system dating back to the 1969 Act of Free Choice, it also may have only really emerged in 2004, [1] when Indonesia began to hold local elections. [9] :66

Democratisation following the fall of the Suharto regime included the creation of special autonomy for the provinces of Indonesian Western New Guinea in 2001. This territory is extremely diverse ethnically and linguistically, with many remote areas in difficult terrain. Tribes in Western New Guinea continue to follow customary law. [4] :2

In 2009 the noken system was used in parts of Paniai Regency, Puncak Jaya Regency, and Yahukimo Regency. [2] Results in the Yahukimo Regency were disputed, reaching the Constitutional Court of Indonesia in a case brought by Elion Numberi  [ id ]. [4] :8–9 The court rulted that the noken system was a valid method of electoral choice that would reflect customary practices ( adat ) and decrease conflict, [3] allowing for voting by agreement or acclamation. [15] :1 Customary practices are protected under the constitution of Indonesia, [9] :73 and the court felt imposing national standards on these areas might prove detrimental. [4] :2

The election of Lukas Enembe as governor of Papua in 2013 relied heavily on votes originating from the noken system Lukas Enembe Official Portrait as Governor of Papua Province.jpg
The election of Lukas Enembe as governor of Papua in 2013 relied heavily on votes originating from the noken system

To create a consistent system, in 2013 the General Elections Commission of Papua province issued guidelines for the use of noken at polling stations, under which electoral workers would be responsible for marking ballot papers according to the noken bag they were deposited in. The system was used in parts of 10 regencies during the 2013 Papua gubernatorial election. [16] This saw Lukas Enembe elected as governor of Papua due to turnouts of 100% in nine highland districts, while turnout in urban areas was around 60%. [6] Enembe was an advocate of the noken system. Rules for the use of the system were only agreed two weeks before the vote, and electoral observers reported there being no consistency in its implementation. The results were disputed by all other candidates, however the constitutional court ruled that the evidence of electoral fraud was not “structured, systematic and massive”. [13]

Despite some guidelines being put in place, jurisdictional disputes have arisen between national, provincial, and district general elections commissions over responsibility for running noken elections. [9] :73 Disputes arose over the implementation of the noken system in 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014. [9] :73 [17] During the 2014 Indonesian presidential election, the noken system was used in 16 regencies. [18] Losing candidate Prabowo Subianto claimed the use of the noken system did not provide for an actual election. In all cases, the court determined that the system was legal and in keeping with the constitution. [4] :7–8

The Constitutional Court declared itself unable to rule on local election disputes in 2014, although the national legislature restored this power in 2016. [9] :81 Disputes reached the court again in 2017. [9] :82 The General Election Supervisory Agency called the noken system undemocratic in 2016, calling for it to be abolished. [4] :7 However, it still arranged for the system's use in the 2017 Indonesian local elections. [7] In this election, a dispute arose in Dogiyai Regency over the planned use of the noken system, with the local Dogiyai election committee rejecting the decision of the provincial Papua election committee to use noken in the regency, stating that the practice had no history of use in Dogiyai. [19]

In 2019, the noken system was used by 12 regencies for the 2019 Indonesian general election. [lower-alpha 1] In some regencies the standard voting system was used in some districts or villages (Dekai in Yahukimo, 3 villages in Jayawijaya, two villages in Central Mamberamo, five districts and more villages in Lanny Jaya, and 3 villages in Tolikara). [20] A dispute over results on 25 April 2019 led to arrows being exchanged. Electoral irregularities were identified in some districts. [3]

In 2020 the chairman of the Papuan People's Assembly  [ id ] gave a statement in support of ending the noken system in light of its discriminatory impact on women. [21] In 2024 the General Election Supervisory Agency again stated that the system was undemocratic, and should be abolished, leading to discussions on its future over the coming decades. [1] Nonetheless, it was used in parts of the same 12 regencies as 2019, now part of Highland Papua and Central Papua, during the 2024 Indonesian general election. In the six Highland Papua regencies (Central Mamberamo Regency, Jayawijaya Regency, Lanny Jaya Regency, Nduga Regency, Tolikara Regency, and Yahukimo Regency) specific districts and villages were excluded from the system, except for Nduga Regency where it was available at all polling stations. In the Central Papua regencies (Deiyai Regency, Dogiyai Regency, Intan Jaya Regency, Paniai Regency, Puncak Regency, and Puncak Jaya Regency) the noken system was available at all polling stations. [3] [22] In an additional two regencies of Highland Papua (Yalimo Regency and Bintang Mountains Regency) noken were available, but only to store ballots that had been regularly marked through the normal system. [3]

The responsibility for administering the system fell to the Kelompok Penyelenggara Pemungutan Suara  [ id ] (KPPS). [22] The KPPS is tasked with providing noken bags, although communities may also submit their own noken. They also verify the identity of voting tribal chiefs. Once processed, the KPPS translate votes into a normal count that aligns with the standard Indonesian system. [3] Following the 2024 elections, female candidates in Nduga Regency issued a joint statement in opposition to the bungkus method of voting, which led to female candidates receiving very few votes. [8] An electoral dispute following a candidate receiving zero votes in parts of Central Papua reached the constitutional court in April 2024. [23]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dani people</span> Ethnic group of Western New Guinea

The Dani are an ethnic group from the Central Highlands of Western New Guinea in Baliem Valley, Highland Papua, Indonesia. Around 100,000 people live in the Baliem Valley, consisting of representatives of the Dani tribes in the lower and upper parts of the valley each 20,000 and 50,000 in the middle part. The areas west of the Baliem Valley are inhabited by approx 180,000, representatives of the Lani people, incorrectly called "Western Dani". All inhabitants of Baliem Valley and the surrounding areas are often called Dani hence they are also sometimes conflated with other highland tribes such as Lani in the west; Walak in the north; Nduga, Mek, and Yali in the south and east.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Election Commission of Pakistan</span> Constitutional body in Pakistan

The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) is an independent, autonomous, permanent and constitutionally established federal body responsible for organizing and conducting elections to the national parliament, provincial legislatures, local governments, and the office of president of Pakistan, as well as the delimitation of constituencies and preparation of electoral rolls. As per the principles outlined in the Constitution of Pakistan, the Commission makes such arrangements as needed to ensure that the election is conducted honestly, justly, fairly and in accordance with law, and guard against corrupt practices. The Election Commission was formed on 23 March 1956.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Papua conflict</span> 1962–present separatist conflict in Indonesian New Guinea

The Papua conflict is an ongoing conflict in Western New Guinea (Papua) between Indonesia and the Free Papua Movement. Subsequent to the withdrawal of the Dutch administration from the Netherlands New Guinea in 1962 and implementation of Indonesian administration in 1963, the Free Papua Movement has conducted a low-intensity guerrilla war against Indonesia by targeting its military and police, along with ordinary Indonesian citizens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yali people</span> Ethnic group of the Highland Papua, Indonesia

Yali are a major tribal group in Highland Papua, Indonesia, and live to the east of the Baliem Valley, mainly in Yalimo Regency, Yahukimo Regency, and the surrounding regions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jayawijaya Regency</span> Regency in Papua, Indonesia

Jayawijaya Regency is one of the regencies (kabupaten) in the Indonesian province of Highland Papua. It occupies an area of 13,925.31 km2 in the Baliem Valley, situated in the central highlands of the province. It had a population of 196,085 at the 2010 Census, and 269,553 at the 2020 Census; the official estimate as of mid-2023 was 282,497. Its regency seat is the town of Wamena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 Indonesian legislative election</span>

Legislative elections were held in Indonesia on 9 April 2014 to elect 136 members of the Regional Representative Council (DPD), 560 members of the People's Representative Council (DPR) and members of regional assemblies at the provincial and regency/municipality level. For eligible voters residing outside Indonesia, elections were held on 5 or 6 April 2014 based on the decision of the electoral commission of each different countries. The 2014 Lampung gubernatorial election was held concurrently.

<i>Noken</i> Knotted or woven bag native to Indonesia

Noken is a traditional Papuan multifunctional knotted or woven bag native to the Western New Guinea region, Indonesia. Its distinctive usage, which involves being hung from the head, is traditionally used to carry various goods, and also children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 Indonesian general election</span>

General elections were held in Indonesia on 17 April 2019. For the first time in the country's history, the president, the vice president, members of the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR), and members of local legislative bodies were elected on the same day with over 190 million eligible voters. Sixteen parties participated in the elections nationally, including four new parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 Indonesian general election</span>

General elections were held in Indonesia on 14 February 2024 to elect the president, vice president, and People's Consultative Assembly (MPR), which consists of the House of Representatives (DPR), the Regional Representative Council (DPD), and members of local legislative bodies (DPRD) at the provincial and city/regency levels. The newly elected members of the MPR will be sworn in on 1 October 2024, while the elected president and vice president will be sworn in on 20 October 2024. Incumbent President Joko Widodo was ineligible to run for a third term due to limitations established by the Indonesian constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alex Hesegem</span> Indonesian politician (1957–2021)

Alex Hesegem was an Indonesian politician. He was a member of parliament from 2001 until 2004 and the Vice Governor of Papua from 2006 until 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Papua National Liberation Army</span> Armed wing of the Free Papua Organization

The West Papua National Liberation Army, officially referred to in Indonesia as the Armed Criminal Group, and after 2021, Separatist Terrorist Group, is a Western New Guinean insurgent group in Indonesia. It is the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Papua</span> Province in Indonesia

Central Papua, officially the Central Papua Province is an Indonesian province located in the central region of Western New Guinea. It was formally established on 11 November 2022 from the former eight western regencies of the province of Papua. It covers an area of 61,072.91 km2 and had an officially estimated population of 1,452,810 in mid 2023. It is bordered by the Indonesian provinces of West Papua to the west, the province of Papua to the north and northeast, by Highland Papua to the east, and by South Papua to the southeast. The administrative capital is located in Wanggar District in Nabire Regency, although Timika is a larger town.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Highland Papua</span> Province with special status in Indonesia

Highland Papua is a province of Indonesia, which roughly follows the borders of Papuan customary region of Lano-Pago, shortened to La Pago. It covers an area of 51,213.33 km2 (19,773.58 sq mi) and had a population of 1,448,360 according to the official estimates as at mid 2023.

The following is the broad timeline for major events in the Papua conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nduga hostage crisis</span> 2023 incident in Highland Papua, Indonesia

The Nduga hostage crisis began on 7 February 2023 when Free Papua Movement insurgents attacked a plane and took its pilot and all five passengers hostage. While the passengers were soon released, New Zealander pilot Phillip Mark Mehrtens remained in captivity until 21 September 2024.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regional House of Representatives</span> Regional legislature in Indonesia

In Indonesia, a Regional House of Representatives is the unicameral legislative body of an Indonesian national subdivision, at either the provincial or at the regency/city level. They are based on the amended Constitution of Indonesia, which mandated the creation of such bodies for local governance. The legislatures are present in all Indonesian provinces, and all second-level subdivisions except for the constituent municipalities of Jakarta.

The 2024 Central Papua gubernatorial election will be held on 27 November 2024 as part of nationwide local elections to elect the governor of Central Papua for a five-year term. The election will be the first gubernatorial election for the province since its creation.

The 2024 Highland Papua gubernatorial election will be held on 27 November 2024 as part of nationwide local elections to elect the governor of Highland Papua for a five-year term. The election will be the first election for the province since its formation in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nduga people</span> Ethnic group

Nduga is an indigenous tribe in the Central Highlands region of southern Papua, particularly in the Nduga Regency and surrounding areas. The territory of the Nduga people borders the Dani and Lani to the north, the Asmat to the south, the Damal to the west, and the Ngalik to the east.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dandy Koswaraputra (8 February 2024). "In Indonesia, Papuans' unique 'noken' voting system faces an uncertain future". Benar News. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Nethy Dharma Somba (5 February 2009). "Papuans in remote areas prefer 'noken' to ballot box". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Nasrun Katingka; Iqbal Basyari (31 January 2024). "Ada "Noken" di Pemilu 2024". KOMPAS (in Indonesian). Retrieved 22 September 2024.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ignatius Yordan Nugraha (November 2021). "Legal Pluralism, Human Rights and the Right to Vote: The Case of the Noken System in Papua". Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law. 22 (2): 255–286. doi:10.1163/15718158-22020003. SSRN   3974582.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Birgit Bräuchler (January 2014). "Modes of Belonging in West Papua: Local Symbolism, National Politics and International Cultural Concepts". RIMA: Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs. 48: 35–66.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cillian Nolan (17 April 2014). "How Papua voted" . Retrieved 23 September 2024.
  7. 1 2 Herlambang P. Wiratraman; Dian A. H. Shah (2019). "Indonesia's Constitutional Responses to Plurality". In Jaclyn L. Neo; Ngoc Son Bui (eds.). Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 136. ISBN   9781509920471.
  8. 1 2 "Protes Caleg Perempuan Nduga: Sistem Noken Mendiskriminasi Hak Politik Kami". Papua60detik (in Indonesian). 20 February 2024. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tri Efriandi; Oscar Couwenberg; Ronald L. Holzhacker (2021). "The Noken System and the Challenge of Democratic Governance at the Periphery: An Analysis of Free and Fair Elections in Papua, Indonesia" (PDF). In R. L. Holzhacker; W. G. Z. Tan (eds.). Challenges of Governance: Development and Regional Integration in Southeast Asia and ASEAN. Development and Governance. Springer. pp. 65–85. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59054-3_4. ISBN   978-3-030-59053-6.
  10. Simon Butt (2015). The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. BRILL. p. 169. ISBN   9789004250598.
  11. 1 2 Vidhyandika Djati Perkasa (2016). "Democracy and Legitimacy 'from Below': Contextualizing Papua's Governance and Traditional Electoral System". In Azmi Sharom; Sriprapha Petcharamesree; Yanuar Sumarlan; Vachararutai Boonthinand; Joel Mark Baysa Barredo (eds.). Human Rights and Peace in Southeast Asia Series 4: Challenging the Norms (PDF). Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies (IHRP). ISBN   9786162798481.
  12. Jonathan Siborutorop (23 May 2024). "Women's representation in the noken system in Indonesian Papua". Australian National University. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
  13. 1 2 3 "Carving up Papua: More Districts, More Trouble" (PDF). Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict. 9 October 2013. pp. 11–14. Retrieved 23 September 2024.
  14. Tito Panggabean (18 August 2014). "Sistem Noken dan "Bigman"". KOMPAS (in Indonesian). Retrieved 23 September 2024.
  15. 1 2 Elias Hence Thesia (May 2023). "Studying the Fulfilment of Constitutional Rights by Implementing the Noken System in the General Elections in Papua". European Journal of Law and Political Science. 2 (3): 1–14. doi: 10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.3.86 . ISSN   2796-1176.
  16. Andi Hajramurni; Nethy Dharma Somba (22 January 2013). "S. Sulawesi set for vote; Papua rules on 'noken'". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
  17. "No Rule on Noken System, Act on Legislative Election to be Sued". Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. 1 April 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  18. Neles Tebay (21 August 2014). "Sistem Noken dan Demokrasi". KOMPAS (in Indonesian). Retrieved 23 September 2024.
  19. Nethy Dharma Somba (19 January 2017). "One Papuan regency opts out of 'noken' voting system". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  20. 1 2 Dhias Suwandi; Farid Assifa (15 April 2019). "Daerah-daerah di Papua yang Memakai Sistem Noken pada Pemilu 2019". KOMPAS (in Indonesian). Retrieved 23 September 2024.
  21. Roylinus Ratumakin (12 February 2020). "Sistem Noken Dinilai Mendiskriminasi Suara Perempuan". Medcom.id (in Indonesian). Retrieved 24 September 2024.
  22. 1 2 Vitorio Mantalean; Ihsanuddin (13 February 2024). "11 Kabupaten di Papua Tengah dan Pegunungan Pakai Sistem Noken pada Pemilu 2024". KOMPAS (in Indonesian). Retrieved 22 September 2024.
  23. Siti Rosmalina Nurhayati (29 April 2024). "PAN Questions Zero Votes in the Noken System in Central Papua". Constitional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved 22 September 2024.