Sisyphus Shelter

Last updated

Sisyphus Shelter is an archaeological site that was uncovered in Colorado when the Colorado Department of Highways was working on I-70. The excavation of this site became a joint project between the Colorado Department of Highways and the Bureau of Land Management. Fieldwork on the site was completed in 1980. Archaeologists John Gooding and Wm. Lane Shields as well as many others completed the excavation and prepared a comprehensive site report. Over the course of the fieldwork on Sisyphus Shelter, twenty-six features of human origin were discovered as well as numerous stone artifacts and two perishable items. The artifacts appeared to be all Late Archaic in origin. Dating indicated a range of occupations from modern times to 4400 B.P. being the oldest sample. Gooding and Shields (1985) suggest that the occupations of the shelter were not consistent and affected by seasonal changes. [1]

Contents

Location

Sisyphus Shelter was found because the purposed realignment of westbound I-70 put the interstate directly through the site. Sisyphus Shelter is a rock shelter made up of two individual shelters with a natural enclosure of fallen rocks. It is located in Garfield County, Colorado, in the Grand Valley about halfway between Rifle and Grand Junction. [2] Gooding and Shields (1985) note that a reference point was used to measure an elevation of 1570.3 m (5151.9 ft) above sea level. [3] Two of the nearby dominant features are Battlement Mesa and the Colorado River. Battlement Mesa is approximately 11.2 km (approximately 7 miles) to the southeast of the site and the Colorado River is about 1.5 km (approximately .9 mile) to the southeast. Gooding and Shields used two nearby archaeological sites for comparison. These were the DeBeque Rockshelter, another rockshelter like Sisyphus Shelter, and Kewclaw Site, an excavated open pit-house. [4]

Environment

The area surrounding Sisyphus Shelter is composed of a low elevation pinyon-juniper woodland community. This consists mainly of Utah Juniper, Pinyon Pine, big sagebrush and Mormon Tea. [5] Close by is a cottonwood forest community, along the Colorado River, and a low elevation big sagebrush community, north of the site along gentle slopes. [6] The cottonwood area is composed of broadleaf cottonwood, rabbitbrush, skunkbrush, and big sagebrush.

The geology of the area is mainly composed of tan sandstone with imbedded gray shales. [7] Gooding and Shields note that in this type of area, outcroppings form slopes and lead to a badlands form of topography. [8] According to these archaeologists, rockshelters, such as DeBeque Rockshelter and Sisyphus Shelter, are commonly formed in this type of terrain. [9] Sisyphus Shelter itself is formed of sandstone that is gray to tan. Below this is green mudstone. [10]

The shelter’s proximity to the Colorado River affords moisture for the plants and animals in the area. Rainfall is extremely variable due to the semi-arid climate of this section of Colorado. Temperatures in the area have an average range of between 20°C in July and -6°C to -8°C in January. [11] Gooding and Shields point out that the actual temperatures in the shelter would have been higher because it faces south. Several test core samples were taken from various points in the site before excavation was started in order to determine dates and gather other paleo-environmental data. [12] From these samples, pollen was extracted as well as any other elements that could be carbon dated.

Artifacts and features

The artifacts found at Sisyphus shelter can be classified as stone tools, projectile points (arrowheads and spearheads) and two perishable items. 99% of all the artifacts found were made of stone. [13] These artifacts were found within various levels of excavation ranging from level I at the deepest to level X just under the surface. The features discovered consist of hearths, two pits, one alignment of post holes in a tripod configuration and one habitation. All artifacts and samples from the site are located at the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History. [14]

The stone tools and projectile points were made from materials such as chalcedony, chert, quartzite, metasediment and sandstone. [15] All but two of the 23 projectile points are made from chert or chalcedony, with two quartzite projectile points also found. Out of the group of stone tools, only a few biface (shaped edges on both sides) knives were found and these were made from chert or chalcedony. [16]

The categories of stone artifacts found include cutting tools, scraping tools, incising tools, striking tools, and many flakes that were used for various purposes. The cutting tools were most numerous having 131 specimens. These included 23 projectile points, 37 knives, 13 multi-functional tools, 20 blades, 3 backed blades, 2 drills and 33 biface fragments. The scraping tools consisted of 31 specimens, which varied in their purpose and the location of the scraping edge. The incising tools were least numerous with 22 specimens.

The perishable artifacts found at Sisyphus Shelter consisted of a fragment of basketry and an arrow shaft with a nock. Gooding and Shield note that these appeared to originate from the last occupation of the site about 580-520 B.P. [17] The archaeologists were unable to determine the material the arrow shaft fragment was composed of; however, a reinforced collar around the nock was found to be made of yucca. The basketry fragment was also composed of yucca. [18]

Most of the hearths found, along with the tripod, were associated with the habitation structure, which was the largest feature of the site. [19] The tripod that was discovered was not related to any of the hearths so the archeologists speculate that instead of being used for cooking this was used as a type of backrest like those used by historic aboriginal populations. [20] The two pits discovered were not thought to be used for fire. One appeared to be a storage pit and the other an ash pit. 18 hearths were found on many different levels showing different occupations of humans. The hearths consisted of surface hearths and basin hearths, basin hearths being the most common and also the most sophisticated. [21]

Interpretations and conclusions

The chronology of Sisyphus Shelter is determined to have been between 4400 B.P. and 500 B.P.. [22] The archaeologists interpreted that Sisyphus Shelter was mainly used as a winter shelter. This was determined by the fact that the site is south-facing and located on sandstone benches above the river basin. Because of this it is not open to direct exposure during the winter, being blocked from wind and storms. [23] Another consideration is that during summer months Sisyphus Shelter did not offer shade from the sun while the shelter form and hearth placement allowed for a heat shield in the winter so that activities could go on protected from much of the cold. [24] Gooding and Shields also note that the area of the Grand Valley in which Sisyphus Shelter is located is an established winter range for deer. [25] From a broader climatic perspective, the site was more intensely used during periods of warm, dry climate and less during wetter and possibly colder climates. [26]

The archaeologists point out seven defined occupational periods using dates from Sisyphus Shelter in correlation with dates at the nearby sites of DeBeque Rockshelter and the Kewclaw Site, as well as other Colorado archaeological sites in further surrounding areas. The earliest occupation at Sisyphus Shelter (4400-4100 B.P.) was predated by occupations at other sites in the area. [27] The second occupation (3700-3600 B.P.) was much less intense than others with only one hearth built, however the artifacts from these dates show little change from the first occupation. [28] The third occupation (3400-3200 B.P.) relates to dates from many other rockshelter sites suggesting that at this point in time, rockshelters were desirable sites across the Colorado Plateau. [29]

Between the first three occupations of this site and the remaining occupations there is a gap occurring between 3200 and 2400 years ago. [30] This is significant because all the dates from the Kewclaw archaeological site fall within this range, suggesting a shift from rockshelter habitation to living in basin houses located in open areas. [31] This break in habitation at Sisyphus Shelter also occurred during a time of climate shift from wetter and possibly cooler conditions during the third occupation to a very warm and dry climate during the fourth occupation. [32]

The habitation structure was built during the fourth occupation of Sisyphus Shelter between 2410 B.P. and 2400 B.P., which suggests the introduction of more complex cultural elements. [33] This slab-lined dwelling is unique to the cultural record of the area though there appears to have been a habitation structure at the Kewclaw site as well. [34]

The fifth occupation (2100-1850 B.P.), in comparison, illustrated a return to rockshelter habitations with fewer types of stone used for tools than was seen in the fourth occupation. [35] The sixth (1210-1010 B.P.) and seventh (580-520 B.P.) occupations correlate with large numbers of dates from the surrounding four counties and have the most animal remains, showing a wide range of mammals used by the inhabitants. [36]

Sisyphus Shelter is late Archaic falling into the Uncompahgre Technocomplex which can be understood as a kind of sub-alpine, desert archaic. [37] The artifacts found support this by the nature of having a retouch flake technology. [38] This inclusion into the Uncompahgre Technocomplex illustrates the level of cultural development of the inhabitants of this and other sites within this specific geographical area.

Related Research Articles

Meadowcroft Rockshelter United States historic place

Meadowcroft Rockshelter is an archaeological site located near Avella in Jefferson Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania, United States. The site is a rock shelter in a bluff overlooking Cross Creek, and contains evidence that the area may have been continually inhabited for more than 19,000 years. If accurately dated, it would be one of the earliest known sites with evidence of a human presence and continuous human occupation in the New World.

Stanfield-Worley Bluff Shelter

The Stanfield-Worley Bluff Shelter, located on private property in Colbert County in northwestern Alabama, United States, is one of the most important prehistoric sites excavated in the state due to the archeological evidence deposited by the Paleo-Indians who once occupied the rock shelter. Lying in Sanderson Cove along a tributary of Cane Creek approximately seven miles (11 km) south of the Tennessee Valley, the shelter and the high bluffs of the surrounding valley provided a well-protected environment for the Native American occupants.

Fort Rock Cave United States historic place

Fort Rock Cave was the site of the earliest evidence of human habitation in the US state of Oregon before the excavation of Paisley Caves. Fort Rock Cave featured numerous well-preserved sagebrush sandals, ranging from 9,000 to 13,000 years old. The cave is located approximately 1.5 miles (2.4 km) west of Fort Rock near Fort Rock State Natural Area in Lake County. Fort Rock Cave was declared a National Historic Landmark in 1961, and added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1966.

Lindenmeier Site United States historic place

The Lindenmeier Site is a stratified multi-component archaeological site most famous for its Folsom component. The former Lindenmeier Ranch is in the Soapstone Prairie Natural Area, in northeastern Larimer County, Colorado, United States. The site contains the most extensive Folsom culture campsite yet found with a radiocarbon date of 10,600 to 10,720 B.P. Artifacts were also found from subsequent Archaic and Late pre-historic periods.

Lehner Mammoth-Kill Site United States historic place

The Lehner Mammoth-Kill Site is a location in southern Arizona that is significant for its association with evidence that mammoths were killed here by Paleo-Indians 9000 years BCE.

Gatecliff Rockshelter United States historic place

Gatecliff Rockshelter (26NY301) is a major archaeological site in the Great Basin area of the western United States that provides remarkable stratigraphy; it has been called the "deepest archaeological rock shelter in the Americas". Located in Mill Canyon of the Toquima Range in the Monitor Valley of central Nevada, Gatecliff Rockshelter has an elevation of 7,750 feet (2,360 m). David Hurst Thomas discovered Gatecliff Rockshelter in 1970 and began excavations in 1971. Full scale excavations occurred at Gatecliff Rockshelter for about seven field seasons in which nearly 33 feet (10 m) of sediments were exposed for a well-defined stratigraphic sequence. The well-preserved artifacts and undisturbed sediments at Gatecliff Rockshelter provides data and information have been applied to a range of research topics. Based on the analysis of the artifacts at Gatecliff Rockshelter, it can be determined that it was most likely a short-term field camp throughout prehistory. The latest evidence for human usage at Gatecliff occurs between ca. 5500 B.P. to 1250 B.P.

Eva Site Prehistoric Native American site in Benton County, Tennessee

The Eva site (40BN12) is a prehistoric Native American site in Benton County, Tennessee, in the Southeastern United States. Located along an ancient channel of the Tennessee River, the Eva site saw extensive periods of occupation during the Middle and Late Archaic period. The site's well-defined midden layers helped investigators identify three distinct Archaic cultures, the oldest of which was first identified at Eva and is still known as the "Eva culture" or the "Eva phase."

LoDaisKa Site United States historic place

The LoDaisKa Site is a prominent archaeological site in the U.S. state of Colorado, located within a rockshelter near Morrison. The rockshelter was first inhabited by people of the Archaic through the Middle Ceramic period, generally spanning 3000 BC to 1000 AD.

Franktown Cave United States historic place

Franktown Cave is located 25 miles south of Denver, Colorado on the north edge of the Palmer Divide. It is the largest rock shelter documented on the Palmer Divide, which contains artifacts from many prehistoric cultures. Prehistoric hunter-gatherers occupied Franktown Cave intermittently for 8000 years beginning about 6400 B.C. The site held remarkable lithic and ceramic artifacts, but it is better known for its perishable artifacts, including animal hides, wood, fiber and corn. Material goods were produced for their comfort, task-simplification and religious celebration. There is evidence of the site being a campsite or dwelling as recent as AD 1725.

The Trinchera Cave Archeological District (5LA9555) is an archaeological site in Las Animas County, Colorado with artifacts primarily dating from 1000 BC to AD 1749, although there were some Archaic period artifacts found. The site was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 2001 and is located on State Trust Lands.

Archaic–Early Basketmaker Era Ancient culture of the southwest United States

The Archaic–Early Basketmaker Era was an Archaic cultural period of ancestors to the Ancient Pueblo People. They were distinguished from other Archaic people of the Southwest by their basketry which was used to gather and store food. They became reliant on wild seeds, grasses, nuts, and fruit for food and changed their movement patterns and lifestyle by maximizing the edible wild food and small game within a geographical region. Manos and metates began to be used to process seeds and nuts. With the extinction of megafauna, hunters adapted their tools, using spears with smaller projectile points and then atlatl and darts. Simple dwellings made of wood, brush and earth provided shelter.

The Cherry Creek Rockshelter is an archaeological site in central Colorado, located within modern-day Castlewood Canyon State Park near Franktown, Colorado. Current research indicates that it was used by Native American inhabitants beginning in the Archaic period. The site is situated on the Palmer Divide, which allowed for a unique prehistoric environment that contributed to an abundance of food and water sources, as well as lithic materials for tool-making. These factors, combined with the structure and situation of the shelter itself, made the site a particularly attractive environment for prehistoric peoples to settle in. Archaeological study of the site began in 1955, with the most current original research concluding in 2002.

Archeological Site No. AU-154 United States historic place

Site AU-154 is an archaeological site in Shenandoah National Park, in Augusta County, Virginia, United States.

Paine Run Rockshelter United States historic place

The Paine Run Rockshelter (44-AU-158) is an archaeological site in Shenandoah National Park, in Augusta County, Virginia, United States.

Hidden Valley Rockshelter United States historic place

The Hidden Valley Rockshelter (44-BA-31) is a significant archaeological site located near the community of Warm Springs in Bath County, Virginia, United States. A large rockshelter located near the Jackson River, it has been occupied by humans for thousands of years, and it has been named a historic site.

Tham Lod Rockshelter, first researched by Rasmi Shoocongdej from Silpakorn University, funded by the Thai Research Fund, was a prehistoric cemetery and a workshop located in Northern Thailand known to have human inhabitants from the late Pleistocene to the late Holocene period Additionally, Tham Lod is near Ban Rai, another rock shelter and is in the vicinity of two well known caves, Spirit Cave and Tham Lot cave. Recent researches and carbon dating suggested that Homo sapiens have occupied the area. These researches provide more detail on the activities by the humans in the area which includes burials, living habits, gathering, and tool making, and social interactions.

East Lake Abert Archeological District United States historic place

The East Lake Abert Archeological District is an area in Lake County, Oregon, United States, that features numerous prehistoric camp sites and petroglyphs. It is located along the eastern shore of Lake Abert on land administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the Oregon Department of Transportation. The site includes stone-walled house pits and prehistoric rock art made by ancient Native Americans who occupied the site for approximately 11,000 years. Because of its unique archaeological and cultural significance, the East Lake Abert Archaeological District was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1978.

Melkhoutboom Cave is an archaeological site dating to the Later Stone Age, located in the Zuurberg Mountains, Cape Folded Mountain Belt, Sarah Baartman District Municipality in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.

Dry Creek Rockshelter near Boise, Idaho, is an archaeological site showing periodic use over approximately 3000 years. The site is located under a sandstone overhang, roughly 21 metres (69 ft) wide by 4 metres (13 ft) deep. The rockshelter is unique in that no other local sandstone outcrops are large enough for human habitation. The site was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1991, and the site address is listed as restricted.

Mochena Borago

Mochena Borago is a rockshelter and archaeological site situated on the western slope of Mount Damota, nearest to the town of Wolaita Sodo in Ethiopia, located in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region. The site is well-dated, with 59 radiocarbon dates, which gives it one of the most secure chronologies among Late Pleistocene sites in the Horn of Africa and Eastern Africa. It is one of only a few African sites found with intact deposits dating to Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 3 outside of South Africa, and was potentially a refugium for hunter-gatherering peoples during the cold and arid period of MIS 4. This makes it an important research site for testing the "refugium theory," which states that over the past 70,000 years, during cold, arid conditions, like those of the Last Glacial Maximum and MIS 4, humans sought refuge in the mountains of the southwest Ethiopian Highlands, which received higher rainfall, making them more habitable than the surrounding areas. Research at Mochena Borago is helping to reconstruct human behavior during the Late Pleistocene, and the paleoenvironment that Homosapiens would have inhabited at this time in the Horn of Africa.

References

  1. ↑ “Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.iv
  2. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.3
  3. ↑ “Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.3
  4. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.3
  5. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.9
  6. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp. 9,10
  7. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985). “Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 3
  8. ↑ (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.6
  9. ↑ (1985)“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.3
  10. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 31
  11. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.9
  12. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985). “Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp. 27,28
  13. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.3
  14. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.1
  15. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 66
  16. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 71
  17. ↑ (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp.38, 118
  18. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.118
  19. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.56
  20. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 54
  21. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.49
  22. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985). “Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 129
  23. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985). “Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.129
  24. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 129
  25. ↑ (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.129
  26. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.132
  27. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp. 38, 130
  28. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp.38, 130
  29. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp.38, 130
  30. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.130
  31. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 130,131
  32. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.132
  33. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp.38, 131
  34. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p.139
  35. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. pp.38, 131
  36. ↑ Gooding and Shields, 1985, pp.38,131
  37. ↑ Gooding and Shields(1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 140
  38. ↑ Gooding and Shields (1985).“Sisyphus Shelter”. Cultural Resources Series Number 18. Bureau of Land Management. p. 139

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.