City of London | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1298–1885 | |
Seats | four |
1885–1950 | |
Seats | two |
Replaced by | Cities of London and Westminster (to form north-eastern part of) |
The City of London was a United Kingdom parliamentary constituency. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1950.
This borough constituency (or 'parliamentary borough/burgh') consisted of the City of London, which is at the very centre of Greater London. The only change by the Parliamentary Boundaries Act 1832 was to include The Temple. [1]
Bounded south by the Thames, the City adjoins Westminster westward, enfranchised in 1545. [2] In other directions a web of tiny liberties and parishes of diverse size adjoined from medieval times until the 20th century. Most of the population of Middlesex was beyond the city's boundaries. From the 17th century three of four new 'divisions' of Ossulstone Hundred adjoined the city reflecting their relative density – Holborn division and Finsbury division to the north and Tower division to the north-east and the east, all enfranchised in 1832.
London is first known to have been enfranchised and represented in Parliament in 1298. Because it was the most important city in England it received four seats in Parliament instead of the normal two for a constituency. Previous to 1298 from the middle of that century, the intermittent first parliaments, the area's households, officially, could turn to their Middlesex "two knights of the shire" – two members of the Commons – as to their interests in Parliament as the City formed part of the geographic county yet from early times wielded independent administration, its corporation.
The city was represented by four MPs until 1885, when this was cut to two, and in 1950 the constituency was abolished.
The City of London was originally a densely populated area. Before the Reform Act 1832 the composition of the City electorate was not as democratic as that of some other borough constituencies, such as neighbouring Westminster. The right of election was held by members of the Livery Companies. However the size and wealth of the community meant that it had more voters than most other borough constituencies. Namier and Brooke estimated the size of the City electorate, in the latter part of the 18th century, at about 7,000. Only Westminster had a larger size of electorate.
During the 19th and 20th centuries the metropolitan area of London expanded greatly. The resident population of the City fell. People moved to the new definitively urban expansion and suburbs; businesses moved in. However the City authorities did not want to extend their jurisdiction beyond the traditional "square mile" so the constituency was left unchanged as its resident population fell. By 1900 almost all electors in the City qualified through Livery Company membership and lived outside of the city. The business voters were a type of plural voter which when abolished by the Representation of the People Act 1948 meant the City became immediately under-sized in electorate, akin to the least-worst examples of pre-1832 "rotten and pocket boroughs".
In 1950 the area was merged for parliamentary purposes with the eldest parts of the neighbouring City of Westminster, to form the seat Cities of London and Westminster. The pre-1900 heavily subdivided city became simplified for the period 1907 and 1965 into one civil parish, before in that year this level of local government complication was taken away. Statutory protection applied between 1986 and 2011 to prevent division of the City between seats:
There shall continue to be a constituency which shall include the whole of the City of London and the name of which shall refer to the City of London"
— Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 Sch.2 Rule 3 (repealed, 2011) [3]
See City of London (elections to the Parliament of England) for citizens known to have represented the City in Parliament before 1707
From | To | Name | Born | Died | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1707 | 1715 | Sir William Withers (T) | c. 1654 | 31 January 1721 | |
1708 | 1710 | John Ward (W) | c. 1650 | 12 March 1726 | |
1710 | 1715 | Sir Richard Hoare (T) | 8 September 1649 | 6 January 1719 | |
1710 | 1714 | Sir George Newland (T) | c. 1646 | 26 March 1714 | |
1710 | 1715 | Sir John Cass (T) | 28 February 1661 | 5 July 1718 | |
1715 | 1722 | Robert Heysham (W) | 16 August 1663 | 25 February 1723 | |
1715 | 1722 | Sir John Ward (W) | c. 1650 | 12 March 1726 | |
1715 | 1724 | Peter Godfrey (T) | 1665 | 10 November 1724 | |
1715 | 1722 | Sir Thomas Scawen (W) | c. 1650 | 22 September 1730 | |
1722 | 1727 | Richard Lockwood (T) | 1676 | 30 August 1756 | |
1722 | 1761 | Sir John Barnard (W) | c. 1685 | 29 August 1764 | |
1722 | 1727 | Francis Child (T) | c. 1684 | 20 April 1740 | |
1724 | 1727 | Sir Richard Hopkins | ... | 2 January 1746 | |
1727 | 1734 | Sir John Eyles, Bt (W) | 1683 | 11 March 1745 | |
1727 | 1741 | Micajah Perry (W) | ... | 22 January 1753 | |
1727 | 1741 | Humphry Parsons (T) | c. 1676 | 21 March 1741 | |
1734 | 1741 | Robert Willimot (T) | ... | 19 December 1746 | |
1741 | 1747 | George Heathcote (T) | 7 December 1700 | 7 June 1768 | |
1741 | 1747 | Sir Daniel Lambert (T) | 7 September 1685 | 13 May 1750 | |
1741 | 1742 | Sir Robert Godschall (T) | c. 1692 | 26 June 1742 | |
1742 | 1754 | Sir William Calvert (W) | c. 1703 | 3 May 1761 | |
1747 | 1758 | Slingsby Bethell (W) | 16 March 1695 | 1 November 1758 | |
1747 | 1754 | Stephen Janssen (W) | ... | 1777 | |
1754 | 1773 | Sir Robert Ladbroke (T) | c. 1713 | 31 October 1773 | |
1754 | 1770 | William Beckford (T) | 19 December 1709 | 21 June 1770 | |
1758 | 1768 | Sir Richard Glyn (T) | 13 June 1711 | 1 January 1773 | |
1761 | 1774 | Hon. Thomas Harley (T) | 24 August 1730 | 1 December 1804 | |
1768 | 1774 | Barlow Trecothick (RW) | c. 1718 | 28 May 1775 | |
1770 | 1780 | Richard Oliver | 7 January 1735 | 16 April 1784 | |
1773 | 1784 | Frederick Bull (R) | c. 1714 | 10 January 1784 | |
1774 | 1780 | John Sawbridge (R) | 1732 | 21 February 1795 | |
1774 | 1781 | George Hayley (R) | ... | 30 August 1781 | |
1780 | 1780 | John Kirkman | 1741 | 19 September 1780 | |
1780 | 1790 | Nathaniel Newnham | c. 1741 | 26 December 1809 | |
1780 | 1795 | John Sawbridge | 1732 | 21 February 1795 | |
1781 | 1796 | Sir Watkin Lewes | c. 1740 | 13 July 1821 | |
1784 | 1793 | Brook Watson | 11 February 1735 | 2 October 1807 | |
1790 | 1800 | Sir William Curtis | 25 January 1752 | 18 January 1829 | |
1793 | 1800 | Sir John Anderson, Bt | c. 1735 | 21 May 1813 | |
1795 | 1800 | William Lushington | 18 January 1747 | 11 September 1823 | |
1796 | 1800 | Harvey Christian Combe | 1752 | 4 July 1818 |
Note:-
In multi-member elections the bloc voting system was used. Voters could cast a vote for one to four (or up to two in two-member elections 1885–1950) candidates, as they chose. The leading candidates with the largest number of votes were elected. In 1868 the limited vote was introduced, which restricted an individual elector to using one, two or three votes, in elections to fill four seats.
In by-elections, to fill a single-seat, the first past the post system applied.
After 1832, when registration of voters was introduced, a turnout figure is given for contested elections. In multi-member elections, when the exact number of participating voters is unknown, this is calculated by dividing the number of votes by four (to 1868), three (1868–1885) and two thereafter. To the extent that electors did not use all their votes this will be an underestimate of turnout.
Where a party had more than one candidate in one or both of a pair of successive elections change is calculated for each individual candidate, otherwise change is based on the party vote.
Candidates for whom no party has been identified are classified as non-partisan. The candidate might have been associated with a party or faction in Parliament or consider himself to belong to a particular political tradition. Political parties before the 19th century were not as cohesive or organised as they later became. Contemporary commentators (even the reputed leaders of parties or factions) in the 18th century did not necessarily agree who the party supporters were. The traditional parties, which had arisen in the late 17th century, became increasingly irrelevant to politics in the 18th century (particularly after 1760), although for some contests in some constituencies party labels were still used. It was only towards the end of the century that party labels began to acquire some meaning again, although this process was by no means complete for several more generations.
Sources: The results are based on the History of Parliament Trust's volumes on the House of Commons in various periods from 1715 to 1820, Stooks Smith from 1820 until 1832 and Craig from 1832. Where Stooks Smith gives additional information this is indicated in a note. See references below for further details of these sources.
Dates of general and by-elections from 1660 to 1715 (excluding general elections at which no new MP was returned)
|
|
1710s – 1720s – 1730s – 1740s – 1750s – 1760s – 1770s – 1780s – 1790s |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Richard Hoare | 3,842 | 12.84 | N/A | |
Tory | George Newland | 3,826 | 12.78 | N/A | |
Tory | John Cass | 3,802 | 12.70 | N/A | |
Tory | William Withers | 3,763 | 12.57 | N/A | |
Whig | John Ward | 3,730 | 12.46 | N/A | |
Whig | Robert Heysham | 3,688 | 12.32 | N/A | |
Whig | Peter Godfrey | 3,657 | 12.22 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Scawen | 3,625 | 12.11 | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Robert Heysham | 3,499 | 13.86 | N/A | |
Whig | John Ward | 3,475 | 13.76 | N/A | |
Tory | Peter Godfrey | 3,471 | 13.75 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Scawen | 3,439 | 13.62 | N/A | |
Tory | John Cass | 2,884 | 11.42 | N/A | |
Tory | William Withers | 2,879 | 11.40 | N/A | |
Tory | William Stewart | 2,828 | 11.20 | N/A | |
Tory | George Mertinns | 2,774 | 10.99 | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Richard Lockwood | 4,235 | 18.40 | +18.40 | |
Whig | John Barnard | 3,980 | 17.29 | +17.29 | |
Tory | Peter Godfrey | 3,852 | 16.74 | +2.99 | |
Tory | Francis Child | 3,784 | 16.44 | +16.44 | |
Tory | Humphrey Parsons | 3,593 | 15.61 | +15.61 | |
Whig | Robert Heysham | 3,573 | 15.52 | +1.66 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Richard Hopkins | 3,332 | 53.37 | +53.37 | |
Nonpartisan | Charles Goodfellow | 2,911 | 46.63 | +46.63 | |
Majority | 421 | 6.74 | N/A | ||
Nonpartisan gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Eyles | 3,643 | 13.71 | +13.71 | |
Whig | John Barnard | 3,620 | 13.62 | -3.67 | |
Whig | Micajah Perry | 3,494 | 13.15 | +13.15 | |
Tory | Humphry Parsons | 3,370 | 12.68 | -2.93 | |
Nonpartisan | John Thompson | 3,340 | 12.57 | +12.57 | |
Tory | Richard Lockwood | 3,086 | 11.61 | -6.79 | |
Nonpartisan | John Williams | 3,017 | 11.35 | +11.35 | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Hopkins | 3,010 | 11.32 | +11.32 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Humphrey Parsons | 3,932 | 21.92 | +9.24 | |
Whig | John Barnard | 3,841 | 21.41 | +7.79 | |
Whig | Micajah Perry | 3,725 | 20.76 | +7.61 | |
Tory | Robert Willimot | 2,984 | 16.63 | +16.63 | |
Tory | John Barber | 2,381 | 13.27 | +13.27 | |
Tory | Robert Godschall | 1,078 | 6.01 | +6.01 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Barnard | 3,769 | 21.35 | -0.06 | |
Tory | George Heathcote | 3,322 | 18.82 | +18.82 | |
Tory | Daniel Lambert | 3,217 | 18.23 | +18.23 | |
Tory | Robert Godschall | 3,143 | 17.81 | +11.80 | |
Whig | Micajah Perry | 1,713 | 9.71 | -11.05 | |
Nonpartisan | Edward Bellamy | 1,312 | 7.43 | +7.43 | |
Nonpartisan | Edward Vernon | 1,175 | 6.66 | +6.66 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Calvert | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Calvert | 3,806 | 20.85 | +20.85 | |
Whig | John Barnard | 3,781 | 20.71 | -0.64 | |
Whig | Slingsby Bethell | 3,146 | 17.23 | +17.23 | |
Whig | Stephen Janssen | 3,008 | 16.48 | +16.48 | |
Tory | Daniel Lambert | 2,530 | 13.86 | -4.37 | |
Tory | Robert Ladbroke | 1,986 | 10.88 | +10.88 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Barnard | 3,553 | 18.96 | -1.75 | |
Whig | Slingsby Bethell | 3,547 | 18.93 | +1.70 | |
Tory | Robert Ladbroke | 3,390 | 18.09 | +7.21 | |
Tory | William Beckford | 2,941 | 15.70 | +15.70 | |
Tory | Richard Glyn | 2,655 | 14.17 | +14.17 | |
Whig | William Calvert | 2,650 | 14.14 | -6.71 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Richard Glyn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Robert Ladbroke | 4,306 | 23.36 | +5.27 | |
Tory | Thomas Harley | 3,983 | 21.61 | +21.61 | |
Tory | William Beckford | 3,663 | 19.87 | +4.17 | |
Tory | Richard Glyn | 3,285 | 17.83 | +3.66 | |
Whig | Samuel Fludyer | 3,193 | 17.32 | +17.32 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pro-Government | Thomas Harley | 3,729 | 19.02 | -2.59 | |
Independent Opposition | Robert Ladbroke | 3,678 | 18.76 | -4.60 | |
Nonpartisan | William Beckford | 3,402 | 17.35 | -2.52 | |
Rockingham Whigs | Barlow Trecothick | 2,957 | 15.08 | +15.08 | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Glyn | 2,823 | 14.40 | -3.43 | |
Nonpartisan | John Paterson | 1,769 | 9.02 | +9.02 | |
Radical | John Wilkes | 1,247 | 6.36 | +6.36 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Richard Oliver | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Frederick Bull | 2,695 | 52.07 | New | |
Nonpartisan | John Roberts | 2,481 | 47.93 | New | |
Majority | 214 | 4.14 | N/A | ||
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | John Sawbridge | 3,456 | 17.8 | New | |
Radical | George Hayley | 3,390 | 17.5 | New | |
Independent Radical/Opposition | Richard Oliver | 3,354 | 17.3 | New | |
Radical | Frederick Bull | 3,096 | 15.9 | New | |
Nonpartisan | William Baker | 2,802 | 14.4 | New | |
Nonpartisan | Brass Crosby | 1,913 | 9.9 | New | |
Nonpartisan | John Roberts | 1,398 | 7.2 | New |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Hayley | 4,062 | 21.63 | +4.16 | |
Nonpartisan | John Kirkman | 3,804 | 20.26 | New | |
Nonpartisan | Frederick Bull | 3,150 | 16.77 | +0.83 | |
Nonpartisan | Nathaniel Newnham | 3,036 | 16.17 | New | |
Nonpartisan | John Sawbridge | 2,957 | 15.75 | -2.06 | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Clarke | 1,771 | 9.43 | New |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | John Sawbridge | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Watkin Lewes | 2,685 | 53.05 | New | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Clarke | 2,387 | 46.95 | +37.50 | |
Majority | 309 | 6.10 | N/A | ||
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Brook Watson | 2,097 | 66.78 | New | |
Nonpartisan | Brass Crosby | 1,043 | 33.22 | New | |
Majority | 1,054 | 33.56 | N/A | ||
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Brook Watson | 4,776 | 24.19 | New | |
Nonpartisan | Watkin Lewes | 4,541 | 23.00 | New | |
Nonpartisan | Nathaniel Newnham | 4,467 | 22.56 | +6.49 | |
Nonpartisan | John Sawbridge | 2,812 | 14.24 | -1.51 | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Atkinson | 2,803 | 14.20 | New | |
Nonpartisan | Samuel Smith | 286 | 1.50 | New | |
Nonpartisan | William Pitt | 56 | 0.31 | New |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Curtis | 4,346 | 22.16 | +22.16 | |
Nonpartisan | Brook Watson | 4,101 | 20.91 | -3.28 | |
Nonpartisan | Watkin Lewes | 3,747 | 19.10 | -3.90 | |
Nonpartisan | John Sawbridge | 3,686 | 18.79 | +4.55 | |
Nonpartisan | Nathaniel Newnham | 2,670 | 13.61 | -9.02 | |
Nonpartisan | William Pickett | 1,064 | 5.42 | +5.42 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | John Anderson | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Lushington | 2,334 | 59.94 | +59.94 | |
Nonpartisan | Harvey Christian Combe | 1,560 | 40.06 | +40.06 | |
Majority | 774 | 19.88 | N/A | ||
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Lushington | 4,379 | 20.97 | +20.97 | |
Nonpartisan | William Curtis | 4,313 | 20.66 | -1.50 | |
Nonpartisan | Harvey Christian Combe | 3,865 | 18.51 | +18.51 | |
Nonpartisan | John Anderson | 3,170 | 15.18 | +15.18 | |
Nonpartisan | William Pickett | 2,795 | 13.39 | +7.97 | |
Nonpartisan | Watkin Lewes | 2,356 | 11.28 | -7.82 |
1800s – 1810s – 1820s – 1830s – 1840s – 1850s – 1860s – 1870s – 1880s |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Harvey Christian Combe | 3,377 | 23.91 | +5.40 | |
Tory | Charles Price | 3,236 | 22.91 | +22.91 | |
Tory | William Curtis | 2,989 | 21.16 | +0.50 | |
Tory | John Anderson | 2,387 | 16.90 | +1.72 | |
Whig | Benjamin Travers | 1,371 | 9.71 | +9.71 | |
Nonpartisan | Watkin Lewes | 652 | 4.62 | -6.66 | |
Nonpartisan | William Lushington | 113 | 0.80 | -20.17 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Harvey Christian Combe | 2,294 | 24.11 | +0.20 | |
Tory | James Shaw | 2,275 | 23.91 | +23.91 | |
Tory | Charles Price | 2,254 | 23.69 | +0.78 | |
Tory | William Curtis | 2,213 | 23.26 | +2.10 | |
Tory | John Atkins | 314 | 3.30 | +3.30 | |
Whig | John Hankey | 164 | 1.72 | +1.72 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Price | 3,117 | 26.30 | +2.61 | |
Tory | William Curtis | 3,059 | 25.81 | +2.55 | |
Tory | James Shaw | 2,863 | 24.15 | +0.24 | |
Whig | Harvey Christian Combe | 2,588 | 21.83 | -2.28 | |
Whig | John Hankey | 226 | 1.91 | +0.19 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Harvey Christian Combe | 5,125 | 22.85 | +1.02 | |
Tory | William Curtis | 4,577 | 20.40 | -5.41 | |
Tory | James Shaw | 4,082 | 18.20 | -5.95 | |
Tory | John Atkins | 3,645 | 16.25 | +16.25 | |
Whig | Robert Waithman | 2,622 | 11.69 | +11.69 | |
Whig | Matthew Wood | 2,373 | 10.58 | +10.58 | |
Nonpartisan | Claudius Hunter | 8 | 0.04 | +0.04 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Wood | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Wood | 5,700 | 22.38 | +11.80 | |
Tory | Thomas Wilson | 4,829 | 18.96 | +18.96 | |
Whig | Robert Waithman | 4,693 | 18.43 | +6.74 | |
Whig | John Thorp | 4,335 | 17.02 | +17.02 | |
Tory | William Curtis | 4,224 | 16.58 | -3.82 | |
Tory | John Atkins | 1,688 | 6.63 | -9.62 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Wood | 5,370 | 19.22 | -3.16 | |
Tory | Thomas Wilson | 5,358 | 19.18 | +0.22 | |
Tory | William Curtis | 4,908 | 17.57 | +0.99 | |
Tory | George Bridges | 4,259 | 15.25 | +15.25 | |
Whig | Robert Waithman | 4,119 | 14.74 | -3.69 | |
Whig | John Thorp | 3,921 | 14.04 | -2.98 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Thompson | 6,483 | 24.71 | +24.71 | |
Whig | Robert Waithman | 5,042 | 19.21 | +4.47 | |
Tory | William Ward | 4,991 | 19.02 | +19.02 | |
Whig | Matthew Wood | 4,880 | 18.60 | -0.62 | |
Whig | William Venables | 4,514 | 17.20 | +17.20 | |
Whig | Alderman Garrett | 330 | 1.26 | +1.26 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Thompson | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Robert Waithman | Unopposed | |||
Tory | William Ward | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Matthew Wood | Unopposed | |||
Tory hold | |||||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Thompson | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Robert Waithman | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Matthew Wood | Unopposed | |||
Whig | William Venables | Unopposed | |||
Tory hold | |||||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig gain from Tory |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | George Grote | 8,412 | 23.9 | New | |
Whig | Matthew Wood | 7,488 | 21.3 | N/A | |
Whig | Robert Waithman | 7,452 | 21.2 | N/A | |
Whig | John Key | 6,136 | 17.4 | N/A | |
Tory | George Lyall | 5,112 | 14.5 | N/A | |
Radical | Michael Scales (politician) | 569 | 1.6 | New | |
Turnout | 11,500 | 61.9 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 18,584 | ||||
Majority | 924 | 2.6 | N/A | ||
Radical gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 1,024 | 2.9 | N/A | ||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | George Lyall | 5,569 | 55.2 | +40.7 | |
Whig | William Venables | 4,527 | 44.8 | −15.1 | |
Majority | 1,042 | 10.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 10,096 | 54.3 | −7.6 | ||
Registered electors | 18,584 | ||||
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | +27.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Crawford | 4,041 | 66.8 | +6.9 | |
Tory | Francis Kemble | 2,004 | 33.2 | +18.7 | |
Majority | 2,037 | 33.6 | +30.7 | ||
Turnout | 6,045 | 32.5 | −29.4 | ||
Registered electors | 18,584 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | −5.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Wood | 6,418 | 16.9 | −4.4 | |
Whig | James Pattison | 6,050 | 15.9 | −5.3 | |
Whig | William Crawford | 5,961 | 15.7 | −1.7 | |
Radical | George Grote | 5,955 | 15.6 | −8.3 | |
Conservative | George Lyall | 4,599 | 12.1 | +7.3 | |
Conservative | William Ward | 4,560 | 12.0 | +7.2 | |
Conservative | Thomas Wilson | 4,514 | 11.9 | +7.1 | |
Turnout | 11,456 | 62.6 | −0.7 | ||
Registered electors | 18,288 | ||||
Majority | 6 | 0.1 | −2.8 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −4.9 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | −5.4 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | −3.6 | |||
Majority | 1,356 | 3.5 | +0.9 | ||
Radical hold | Swing | −6.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Wood | 6,517 | 21.4 | +4.5 | |
Whig | William Crawford | 6,071 | 20.0 | +4.3 | |
Whig | James Pattison | 6,070 | 20.0 | +4.1 | |
Radical | George Grote | 5,879 | 19.3 | +3.7 | |
Conservative | John Hinde Palmer | 5,873 | 19.3 | −16.7 | |
Turnout | 11,932 | 60.6 | −2.0 | ||
Registered electors | 19,678 | ||||
Majority | 191 | 0.7 | +0.6 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | +4.3 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | +4.2 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | +4.1 | |||
Majority | 6 | 0.0 | −3.6 | ||
Radical hold | Swing | +3.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Masterman | 6,339 | 12.8 | +8.0 | |
Whig | Matthew Wood | 6,315 | 12.8 | −8.6 | |
Conservative | George Lyall | 6,290 | 12.7 | +7.9 | |
Whig | John Russell | 6,221 | 12.6 | New | |
Conservative | Matthias Wolverley Attwood | 6,212 | 12.5 | +7.7 | |
Whig | James Pattison | 6,070 | 12.3 | −7.7 | |
Whig | William Crawford | 6,065 | 12.2 | −7.8 | |
Conservative | John Pirie | 6,017 | 12.1 | +7.3 | |
Turnout | 12,383 (est) | 64.9 (est) | +4.3 | ||
Registered electors | 19,068 | ||||
Majority | 24 | 0.0 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 25 | 0.0 | -0.7 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −8.2 | |||
Majority | 69 | 0.0 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +8.0 | |||
Majority | 9 | 0.1 | -0.6 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | James Pattison | 6,532 | 50.6 | +0.7 | |
Conservative | Thomas Charles Baring | 6,367 | 49.4 | −0.7 | |
Majority | 165 | 1.2 | +1.2 | ||
Turnout | 12,899 | 64.4 | −0.5 | ||
Registered electors | 20,030 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +0.7 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Russell | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Russell | 7,137 | 14.3 | +1.7 | |
Whig | James Pattison | 7,030 | 14.1 | +1.8 | |
Whig | Lionel de Rothschild | 6,792 | 13.6 | +0.8 | |
Conservative | John Masterman | 6,722 | 13.5 | +0.7 | |
Whig | George Larpent [16] | 6,719 | 13.5 | +1.3 | |
Conservative | Robert Cooper Lee Bevan [17] | 5,268 | 10.5 | −2.2 | |
Conservative | John Johnson (London candidate) | 5,069 | 10.1 | −2.4 | |
Conservative | James William Freshfield | 4,704 | 9.4 | −2.7 | |
Radical | William Payne [18] | 513 | 1.0 | New | |
Turnout | 13,437 | 67.0 | +2.1 | ||
Registered electors | 20,057 | ||||
Majority | 70 | 0.1 | +0.1 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | +1.7 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | +1.7 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +1.2 | |||
Majority | 3 | 0.0 | — | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −0.4 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Lionel de Rothschild | 6,017 | 68.1 | +12.6 | |
Conservative | John Manners | 2,814 | 31.9 | −11.6 | |
Majority | 3,203 | 36.2 | +36.1 | ||
Turnout | 8,831 | 41.5 | −25.5 | ||
Registered electors | 21,270 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +12.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | James Duke | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Masterman | 6,195 | 24.3 | −19.2 | |
Whig | John Russell | 5,537 | 21.7 | +7.4 | |
Whig | James Duke | 5,270 | 20.7 | +6.6 | |
Whig | Lionel de Rothschild | 4,748 | 18.6 | +5.0 | |
Whig | Robert Wigram Crawford | 3,765 | 14.8 | +1.3 | |
Majority | 658 | 2.6 | +2.6 | ||
Turnout | 11,025 (est) | 53.2 (est) | −13.8 | ||
Registered electors | 20,728 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −19.8 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | +6.1 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | +5.7 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | +4.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Russell | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Russell | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Russell | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | James Duke | 6,664 | 22.4 | +1.7 | |
Whig | Lionel de Rothschild | 6,398 | 21.5 | +2.9 | |
Whig | John Russell | 6,308 | 21.2 | −0.5 | |
Whig | Robert Wigram Crawford | 5,808 | 19.6 | +4.8 | |
Whig | Raikes Currie | 4,519 | 15.2 | N/A | |
Majority | 1,289 | 4.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,424 (est) | 38.8 (est) | −14.4 | ||
Registered electors | 19,115 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Lionel de Rothschild | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | James Duke | Unopposed | |||
Liberal | Lionel de Rothschild | Unopposed | |||
Liberal | John Russell | Unopposed | |||
Liberal | Robert Wigram Crawford | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 19,026 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Russell | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Western Wood | 5,747 | 52.3 | N/A | |
Conservative | William Cubitt | 5,241 | 47.7 | New | |
Majority | 506 | 4.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 10,988 | 59.2 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 18,562 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Goschen | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Goschen | 7,102 | 19.9 | N/A | |
Liberal | Robert Wigram Crawford | 7,086 | 19.9 | N/A | |
Liberal | William Lawrence | 6,637 | 18.6 | N/A | |
Liberal | Lionel de Rothschild | 6,525 | 18.3 | N/A | |
Conservative | George Lyall | 4,197 | 11.8 | New | |
Conservative | Robert Fowler | 4,086 | 11.5 | New | |
Majority | 2,328 | 6.5 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 10,529 (est) | 67.8 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 15,534 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Goschen | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Goschen | 6,520 | 15.1 | −4.8 | |
Liberal | Robert Wigram Crawford | 6,258 | 14.5 | −5.4 | |
Liberal | William Lawrence | 6,215 | 14.4 | −4.2 | |
Conservative | Charles Bell | 6,130 | 14.2 | +2.4 | |
Conservative | Philip Twells | 6,099 | 14.1 | +2.6 | |
Conservative | Sills John Gibbons | 6,013 | 13.9 | New | |
Liberal | Lionel de Rothschild | 5,995 | 13.9 | −4.4 | |
Turnout | 12,328 (est) | 61.1 (est) | −6.7 | ||
Registered electors | 20,185 | ||||
Majority | 85 | 0.2 | −6.3 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −3.7 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −4.0 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −4.6 | |||
Majority | 135 | 0.3 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +2.5 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Goschen | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Lionel de Rothschild | Unopposed | |||
Liberal gain from Conservative |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Cotton | 8,397 | 18.7 | +4.5 | |
Conservative | Philip Twells | 8,330 | 18.6 | +4.5 | |
Conservative | John Hubbard | 8,210 | 18.3 | +4.4 | |
Liberal | George Goschen | 6,787 | 15.1 | 0.0 | |
Liberal | William Lawrence | 6,654 | 14.8 | +0.4 | |
Liberal | Lionel de Rothschild | 6,490 | 14.5 | +0.6 | |
Majority | 1,423 | 3.2 | +2.9 | ||
Turnout | 14,956 (est) | 66.1 (est) | +5.0 | ||
Registered electors | 22,626 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +2.0 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −2.2 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Cotton | 10,326 | 21.3 | +2.6 | |
Conservative | Robert Fowler | 10,274 | 21.2 | +2.6 | |
Conservative | John Hubbard | 10,256 | 21.2 | +2.9 | |
Liberal | William Lawrence | 5,950 | 12.3 | −2.5 | |
Liberal | Richard Martin | 5,837 | 12.1 | −3.0 | |
Liberal | Walter Morrison | 5,743 | 11.9 | −2.6 | |
Majority | 4,306 | 8.9 | +5.7 | ||
Turnout | 16,129 (est) | 67.1 (est) | +1.0 | ||
Registered electors | 24,042 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.6 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.8 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.8 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −2.6 | |||
1880s – |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Fowler | 12,827 | 38.8 | +17.6 | |
Conservative | John Hubbard | 8,802 | 26.7 | +5.5 | |
Liberal | Stephen Low | 5,817 | 17.6 | +5.3 | |
Ind. Conservative | William Cotton | 5,563 | 16.9 | −4.4 | |
Turnout | 33,009 | 68.6 | +1.5 (est) | ||
Majority | 2,985 | 9.1 | +7.2 | ||
Registered electors | 29,152 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +7.5 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.4 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Fowler | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Hubbard | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Fowler was elevated to the peerage, becoming Lord Addington, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Charles Baring | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Baring's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hucks Gibbs | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Fowler's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Reginald Hanson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Reginald Hanson | 10,556 | 44.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | Alban Gibbs | 9,258 | 38.5 | N/A | |
Ind. Conservative | James Ritchie (Conservative politician) | 4,207 | 17.5 | New | |
Majority | 5,051 | 21.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 13,490 (est) | 41.3 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 32,664 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alban Gibbs | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Reginald Hanson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alban Gibbs | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Joseph Dimsdale | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alban Gibbs | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Clarke | 16,019 | 38.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | Alban Gibbs | 15,619 | 37.2 | N/A | |
Liberal | Felix Schuster | 5,313 | 12.7 | New | |
Liberal | Joseph West Ridgeway | 5,064 | 12.1 | New | |
Majority | 10,306 | 24.5 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 44,015 | 68.7 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 31,030 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Balfour | 15,474 | 78.9 | +3.7 | |
Free Trader | Thomas Gibson Bowles | 4,134 | 21.1 | New | |
Majority | 11,340 | 57.8 | +33.3 | ||
Turnout | 19,608 | 63.2 | −5.5 | ||
Registered electors | 31,030 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Frederick Banbury | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Balfour | 17,907 | 45.0 | +7.0 | |
Conservative | Frederick Banbury | 17,302 | 43.4 | +6.2 | |
Liberal | Hugh Bell | 4,623 | 11.6 | −13.2 | |
Turnout | 39,832 | 74.7 | +6.0 | ||
Registered electors | 30,010 | ||||
Majority | 12,679 | 31.8 | +7.3 | ||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Balfour | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Banbury | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Arthur Balfour | Unopposed | ||
C | Unionist | Frederick Banbury | Unopposed | ||
Unionist hold | |||||
Unionist hold | |||||
Cindicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Edward Grenfell | 10,114 | 62.08 | N/A | |
Ind. Conservative | Vansittart Bowater | 6,178 | 37.92 | New | |
Majority | 3,936 | 24.16 | New | ||
Turnout | 44,083 | 36.96 | N/A | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Frederick Banbury | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist | Edward Grenfell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Frederick Banbury | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist | Edward Grenfell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Vansittart Bowater | 12,962 | 70.11 | N/A | |
Liberal | Henry Bell | 5,525 | 29.89 | New | |
Majority | 7,437 | 40.22 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 44,130 | 41.89 | N/A | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Vansittart Bowater | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist | Edward Grenfell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Vansittart Bowater | 16,149 | 43.9 | N/A | |
Unionist | Edward Grenfell | 16,092 | 43.7 | N/A | |
Liberal | Thomas Owen Jacobsen | 4,579 | 12.4 | New | |
Majority | 11,513 | 31.3 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 46,469 | 45.2 | N/A | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Vansittart Bowater | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Edward Grenfell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alan Anderson | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alan Anderson | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Vansittart Bowater | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Broadbridge | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National | Andrew Duncan | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
National gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National | Andrew Duncan | 5,332 | 39.48 | N/A | |
Conservative | George Broadbridge | 5,309 | 39.31 | N/A | |
Liberal | Andrew McFadyean | 1,487 | 11.01 | New | |
Independent | S. W. Alexander | 1,379 | 10.21 | New | |
Majority | 23 | 0.17 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 10,851 | 63.9 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Ralph Assheton | 4,506 | 74.99 | +74.99 | |
Liberal | Arthur Comyns Carr | 1,503 | 25.01 | +14.00 | |
Majority | 3,003 | 49.98 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 11,650 | 51.58 | -12.3 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
East Gloucestershire, formally the Eastern division of Gloucestershire and often referred to as Gloucestershire Eastern, was a parliamentary constituency in Gloucestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) using the bloc vote system.
Windsor (/ˈwɪnzə/) is a constituency in Berkshire represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2005 by Adam Afriyie of the Conservative Party. It was re-created for the 1997 general election after it was abolished following the 1970 general election and replaced by the Windsor and Maidenhead constituency.
Inverness Burghs was a district of burghs constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1708 to 1801 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP).
Cambridge University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950.
Oxford University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950. The last two members to represent Oxford University when it was abolished were A. P. Herbert and Arthur Salter.
Berkshire was a parliamentary constituency in England, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of England until 1707, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885. The county returned two knights of the shire until 1832 and three between 1832 and 1885.
Buckinghamshire is a former United Kingdom Parliamentary constituency. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885.
Cornwall is a former county constituency covering the county of Cornwall, in the South West of England. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of England then of the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented by two Knights of the Shire, elected by the bloc vote system.
Middlesex was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800, then of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until abolished in 1885. It returned two members per election by various voting systems including hustings.
Westminster was a parliamentary constituency in the Parliament of England to 1707, the Parliament of Great Britain 1707–1800 and the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801. It returned two members to 1885 and one thereafter.
Birmingham was a parliamentary constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom for the city of Birmingham, in what is now the West Midlands Metropolitan County, but at the time was Warwickshire.
Wallingford was a parliamentary constituency in England, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of England until 1707, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885.
Bristol was a two-member constituency, used to elect members to the House of Commons in the Parliaments of England, Great Britain (1707–1800), and the United Kingdom. The constituency existed until Bristol was divided into single member constituencies in 1885.
Surrey was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1832.
Portsmouth was a borough constituency based upon the borough of Portsmouth in Hampshire. It returned two members of parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, elected by the bloc vote system.
Liskeard was a parliamentary borough in Cornwall, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1295 until 1832, and then one member from 1832 until 1885. The constituency was abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885.
Oxfordshire was a county constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885. It was represented by two Members of Parliament. In 1832 this was increased to three Members of Parliament. The constituency was abolished in 1885, being split into three single member divisions.
Stamford was a constituency in the county of Lincolnshire of the House of Commons for the Parliament of England to 1706 then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1868 when this was reduced to one.
Norfolk was a County constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England from 1290 to 1707, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented by two Members of Parliament. In 1832 the county was divided for parliamentary purposes into two new two member divisions – East Norfolk and West Norfolk.
Flint Boroughs was a parliamentary constituency in north-east Wales which returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and its predecessors, from 1542 until it was abolished for the 1918 general election.