This article is about agriculture in Ukraine .
Agriculture is one of the most important sectors of the economy of Ukraine. Although typically known as the industrial base of the former Soviet Union, Ukraine is one of the world's largest agricultural producers and exporters and is known as the "breadbasket of Europe". [1] It encompasses about 30 to 40 millions of hectares of agricultural land, similar to Germany and France combined. [2] In addition to providing the country's population with a stable supply of high-quality, safe and affordable food, Ukraine's agriculture sector is capable of making a significant contribution to solving the global problem of hunger. Its production potential significantly exceeds the needs of the domestic market. [3] As such, Ukraine is an important supplier of food (and livestock feed) to North Africa, Asia, and Western Europe.
Abou 60% of Ukraine's soil used for agriculture consists of chornozem ("black earth"), a humus-rich soil type that is very fertile. [2] Winter wheat, summer barley, and maize are the main cereal crops, while sunflowers and sugar beet are the main crops grown for industrial processing. The country has long been one of the world's largest agricultural exporters. For wheat, sugar beet, rapeseed, cucumber, rye, barley and walnuts, it was among the top 10 agricultural exporting countries in 2020, and for potatoes, buckwheat, cabbage, maize, pumpkin, carrots and sunflower oil, it was even among the top 5. [4]
Agriculture underwent several major changes in the 20th and 21st centuries. The collectivisation of agriculture in the 1930s and privatisation at the end of the 20th century had particularly significant consequences. The Russo-Ukrainian War since 2014, and especially the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine since 24 February 2022, also had a major impact, as production in parts of the country was greatly reduced. As of May 2024, about 30% of the total potential of the agricultural sector was destroyed, and almost 20% of agricultural land was occupied as a direct result of Russia's war against Ukraine. [5] On the other hand, by 2024, Ukraine's agricultural exports had recovered to pre-war levels. [6]
Agricultural land covers 42 million hectares, or 70% of the country's total land area. 78.9% of agricultural land is arable land and perennial plantations, 13.0% is pastures, 8.4% is hayfields. The highest proportion of arable land is in the Ukrainian regions of the Pontic–Caspian steppe (70–80%) and the East European forest steppe zones. Pastures are concentrated mainly in the Carpathian Mountains, Polissia and the south-eastern steppe regions, while hayfields are located in the river valleys of the Central European mixed forests and East European forest steppe zones.[ citation needed ]
Farms use various crop rotation schemes, sometimes with two, sometimes with four or more crops. An example of such a rotation scheme is fallow, winter wheat, winter wheat, sunflowers, spring barley and maize. Fallow is used to maintain moisture levels. Sometimes the same crop is grown for several years in a row, particularly alfalfa (lucerne).[ citation needed ]
The main crops in agriculture are cereals: winter and spring wheat, rye, winter and spring barley, maize, oats, buckwheat, millet and rice. Grain farming plays an important role in Ukraine's agricultural sector, ensuring a stable supply of bread and bakery products to the population, as well as raw materials for industrial processing.[ citation needed ] The production, processing and export of grain in Ukraine generates significant cash flows to the budget and is an important area of employment for the country's population. In addition, the country's grain industry has significant development potential, primarily due to the availability of abundant land resources and a sufficient amount of skilled labour.[ citation needed ]
According to the 2024 report by the Center for Food and Land Use Research of the Kyiv School of Economics (KSE), [7] Ukraine produced more cabbages and cucumbers in total in 2021 than any of the top 9 vegetable-producing EU countries (Spain, Poland, the Netherlands, Italy, Germany, France, Greece, Romania, and Portugal). [7] : 8–9 Amongst the other three major vegetable crops – tomatoes, onions, and carrots – Ukrainian production volumes were also above the median values of these 9 top EU producer countries in 2021. [7] : 8–9
Nevertheless, the top EU producers had a higher yield per hectare (and thus higher productivity/effiency) for all five vegetables except cabbage (for which Ukrainian yields per hectage were very close to Italian yields). [7] : 9 The gap in yields is highest in tomatoes and cucumbers, which might be explained by the fact that Ukraine has a much larger percentage of these plants grown in the open field rather than in protected greenhouses or polytunnels, as is common in the EU's top-producing countries such as the Netherlands. [7] : 9
Ukraine also produces some wine, mostly in the southwestern regions, such as in Odesa Oblast, Zakarpattia Oblast, and Crimea.[ citation needed ]
Livestock breeding in Ukraine has the place of a kind of ‘processing’ industry that transforms crop products into foodstuffs and technical raw materials. Livestock farming accounts for over 38% of gross agricultural output. Its main branches are cattle breeding, pig breeding, sheep breeding, and poultry farming. Livestock farming also includes aquaculture , beekeeping, and silk farming. In general, the objectives of animal husbandry are to produce high-quality food products and valuable raw materials for the food industry and light industry. The production process in animal husbandry is more mechanised and contributes to the transition of the industry to an industrial basis.[ citation needed ]
Production of certain types of livestock products: [8]
Geography has long influenced the economy of the Ukrainian lands. Rich fertile soils (such as chornozem areas) made the area a "breadbasket": for ancient Greece, [9] as well as for early modern Europe, [10] later the Soviet Union, [11] and again Europe in the 21st century. [2]
The oldest evidence of large-scale agriculture on the modern territory of Ukraine (as well as Moldova and Romania) comes from the Cucuteni–Trypillia culture (abbreviated CT), a Neolithic–Chalcolithic archaeological culture (c. 5050 to 2950 BCE). There is still much uncertainty and disagreement amongst scholars of this CT group, ranging from questions about the relative size of these settlements (the standard view being that these may have been home to thousands of people, with maximalists claiming tens of thousands, and minimalists only small-sized villages), their permanence versus their seasonality, and their degree of urbanisation versus agrarian rurality. [13]
Ancient Greek colonies located on the Crimean Peninsula such as Chersonesus, or elsewhere along the northern Black Sea coast such as Pontic Olbia and the Bosporan Kingdom, were net exporters of grain, and to a lesser degree wine. [14] By contrast to southern mainland Greece, there was no cultivation of olive trees on the northern Black Sea shore. [14] Around 550 BCE, more than a century before the traditional foundation date of Chersonesos in 422/1 BCE, the Tauri people already must have engaged in trade with the Greek world, due to the discovery of "Ionian pottery, some rare fragments of Boeotian black figured ware, and Chiot amphorae" in its oldest layers in the 1990s. [15] A large-scale expansion and transformation of agriculture aimed at winemaking in Crimea developed in Chersonesos after 350 BCE. [16] Paleobotanist Zosia Yanushevich and colleagues demonstrated in 1985 that wine production in ancient Chersonesus involved a domesticated variant of the wild grape Vitis vinifera sylvestris . [16] Earlier studies from Yanushevich and Nikolaenko (1979) demonstrated that the Tarkhankut Peninsula in western Crimea was also well-suited for wheat crops, and that Chersonesos dominated the grain trade with western Crimean settlements like Belyaus, Kalos Limen, and Bolshoy/Velykyj Kastel'. [17]
The main cereal grain crops in Kievan Rus' were rye in the north, millet in the south, supplemented by barley, wheat, buckwheat, and oats. [18] Peas, lentils, flax, and hemp were also grown. [18]
The lands of Kievan Rus' were primarily located in two climatic zones: the Eurasian Steppe (including parts of the East European forest steppe and Ponto-Caspian steppe) with the highly fertile black soils south and west of Kiev [19] (encompassing most of present-day Ukraine), and the forest zone [19] in the northwest (including the Novgorod Republic and present-day Belarus) and the northeast (including the region known as Zalesye, or "area beyond the forest", which became the core of Vladimir-Suzdal). Unlike the forest-steppes in the southwest, the northern forestlands (covered with cedar and birch trees, and more to the south oak trees) were generally well-watered, with adequate precipitation and extensive river systems to sustain agriculture. [19] However, the lands north of the 50th parallel (above Kiev) had short growing seasons, and lacked the highly fertile black soils of the southwest. [19]
The northern climate always made agriculture precarious, never allowed for abundant production, and sometimes the farming system broke down. [20] Several famines have been recorded in written sources, such as the 1024 famine in Suzdalia caused by a drought, prompting the inhabitants to buy grain from Volga Bulgaria. [20] Another famine took place in the Rostov region and Yaroslavl in 1071. [20] Throughout the year 1092, there was a drought in southern Kievan Rus', after which a late frost destroyed young crops and ruined the harvest, causing another famine. [20]
In the forest-steppe zone, the steam farming system with two- and three-land crop rotations was used, in the forest zone the slash-and-burn agriculture system [19] and shifting cultivation (long fallowing) system. [21] Woods were cut down and burnt, thus freeing up arable land and fertilising the soil at the same time. In forest-steppe and steppe regions, the most common farming system was fallowing (crop rotation), in which the fertility of the land was restored naturally. [22]
High labour productivity made it possible to produce more grain than was necessary to meet the biological needs of the population. This, as well as the availability of excellent pastures and hayfields, allowed feudal households to keep large numbers of livestock. For tilling the soil and growing crops, the most advanced tools of the time were used: scythes (for mowing hay), [18] sickles (for reaping), [18] hoes, spades, ards, ploughs, sokhas , [18] harrows, mattocks, [18] and others for digging or ploughing, which were sophisticated enough to ensure high yields – on average, slightly less than 8 centners of grain per hectare. A flail was used to thresh the grain. [22] [23] Sometimes peasants formed collectives to share equipment and help each other with farm work. [23] ![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2025) |
As the Cossack Hetmanate emerged out of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, agriculture remained the main branch of the economy. One of the main causes of the Khmelnytsky Uprising was the anti-feudal struggle of the domestic peasantry. Therefore, immediately after the formation of their own state, all the property of the old Polish magnate nobility was expropriated by the people. Magnates, nobility, and tenants were driven out, and their lands, livestock, and property were transferred to Cossacks, peasants, burghers, and the state administration. The legislation of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth lost its force and the peasants became free. The temporary partial return to the old feudal norms after the defeat in the Battle of Berestechko and the Treaty of Bila Tserkva only strengthened the resistance of the peasantry to the "hereditary lords". Finally, on the territory of the Ukrainian state, the folwark (Ukrainian: filvarka) manor system of management, the land ownership of the crown land, Polish and Ukrainian magnates and nobility, and the Catholic Church were eliminated after the victory in the Battle of Batih (1652).[ citation needed ]
The main part of the liberated territories (and it was a significant land fund: the kingdom owned about 150 cities and towns, magnates and nobles owned about 1,500, and the Catholic Church – 50 estates), as well as uninhabited lands, passed to the state fund, which was owned by the Military Treasury is a component of the apparatus of the Hetman-Starshyna administration. The supreme administrator of the land was the hetman, locally it was managed by colonels and centurions. The lands of Orthodox monasteries and the higher clergy, small nobility, Cossacks and burghers remained in private ownership.[ citation needed ]
Personally, free peasants had to pay a tax to the Military Treasury in the form of a monetary rent. Peasants of free military villages considered the land they cultivated to be their property. In the second half of the 17th – at the beginning of the 18th century, it was freely inherited, given, sold, bought. In privately owned, temporary-conditional possessions, the peasants' right to use the land was limited, and when buying and selling land, only the right to its possession was transferred with existing coercions in favor of the land owners.[ citation needed ]
After the Khmelnytsky Uprising, 80-90% of peasants owned land. According to the materials of the Russian general Rumyantsev's description of "Little Russia", the peasants of the Starshyna, monastery, and government were divided into those who owned land and those who were landless. Allotment owners bequeathed land, leased it, bought and sold it, organized farms. The number of wealthy peasants, who concentrated a large part of allotment land and livestock, increased. The landless commoners either engaged in agriculture on senior, monastic, state land allocated to them for temporary use, or lived off the sale of labor. [24] Some landless peasants kept a lot of cattle, beehives, were engaged in crafts and trades. Some of them had up to 30 to 40 heads of cattle, 20 to 30 pigs, 30 to 40 horses, and up to 300 sheep. Some peasants, the so-called servants, did not have any farms and constantly lived in the foreman's estates either "for subsistence" or for an annual fee (2 to 10 karbovanets).[ citation needed ]
In the 1930s, under pressure from Joseph Stalin, agriculture became collective in nature, despite resistance from Ukrainian farmers. [2] This reform led to the creation of large state farms and collective farms.
At the onset of Soviet Ukraine, having largely inherited conditions from the Tsarist Empire, one of the biggest exporters of wheat in the world, the Ukrainian economy was still centered around agriculture, with over 90% of the workforce being peasants. [28]
In the 1920s, Soviet policy in Ukraine attached importance to developing the economy. The initial agenda, War Communism, had prescribed total communisation and appropriation per quota of food from the people by force [29] - further economic damage and a 1921–1923 famine in Ukraine claiming up to one million lives ensued. With the New Economic Policy and the partial introduction of free markets, an economic recovery followed. After the death of Lenin and the consolidation of his power, Stalin was determined to industrialisation and reversed policy again. As heavy industry and wheat exports boomed, common people in rural areas were bearing a cost. Gradually escalating measures, from raised taxes, dispossession of property, and forced deportations into Siberia culminated in extremely high grain delivery quotas. Even though there is no evidence that agricultural yield could not feed the population at the time, four million Ukrainians were starved to death during the 1932–1933 Holodomor, while Moscow exported over a million tonnes of grain to the West, [30] decimating the population. [31]
Within a decade, Ukraine's industrial production had quintupled, mainly from facilities in the Donets Basin and central Ukrainian cities such as Mykolaiv.[ citation needed ]In 1945, agricultural production stood at only 40 percent of the 1940 level, even though the republic's territorial expansion had "increased the amount of arable land". [32] In contrast to the remarkable growth in the industrial sector, [33] agriculture continued in Ukraine, as in the rest of the Soviet Union, to function as the economy's Achilles heel. Despite the human toll of collectivisation of agriculture in the Soviet Union, especially in Ukraine,[ citation needed ] Soviet planners still believed in the effectiveness of collective farming. The old system was reestablished; the numbers of collective farms in Ukraine increased from 28 thousand in 1940 to 33 thousand in 1949, comprising 45 million hectares; the numbers of state farms barely increased, standing at 935 in 1950, comprising 12.1 million hectares. By the end of the Fourth Five-Year Plan (in 1950) and the Fifth Five-Year Plan (in 1955), agricultural output still stood far lower than the 1940 level. The slow changes in agriculture can be explained by the low productivity in collective farms, and by bad weather-conditions, which the Soviet planning system could not effectively respond to. Grain for human consumption in the post-war years decreased, this in turn led to frequent and severe food shortages. [34]
The increase of Soviet agricultural production was tremendous, however, the Soviet-Ukrainians still experienced food shortages due to the inefficiencies of a highly centralised economy. During the peak of Soviet-Ukrainian agriculture output in the 1950s and early-to-mid-1960s, human consumption in Ukraine, and in the rest of the Soviet Union, actually experienced short intervals of decrease. There are many reasons for this inefficiency, but its origins can be traced back to the single-purchaser and -producer market system set up by Joseph Stalin. [35] [ need quotation to verify ] Khrushchev tried to improve the agricultural situation in the Soviet Union by expanding the total crop size – for instance, in the Ukrainian SSR alone "the amount of land planted with corn grew by 600 percent". At the height of this policy, between 1959 and 1963, one-third of Ukrainian arable land grew this crop. This policy decreased the total production of wheat and rye; Khrushchev had anticipated this, and the production of wheat and rye moved to Soviet Central Asia [ when? ] as part of the Virgin Lands Campaign. Khrushchev's agricultural policy failed, and in 1963 the Soviet Union had to import food from abroad. The total level of agricultural productivity in Ukraine decreased sharply during this period, but recovered in the 1970s and 1980s during Leonid Brezhnev's rule. [36]At the end of the 1990s, a modernisation process took place. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the independence of Ukraine in 1991, former kolkhoz (kolhosp) farming collectives were abolished, and every Ukrainian citizen was granted 2 hectares of resellable land according to the Constitution of Ukraine. [2] To prevent speculators and mafia-like businessmen from snapping up the land at a bargain price – as had happened with heavy industry – a moratorium was imposed (2002): a ban on sales of former kolhosp farmlands. [2] As a result, agricultural lands ended up divided among 7 million Ukrainians, resulting in highly fragmented ownership. [2] However, much of the land remained in the hands of the state. The Ukrainians mostly leased the land to new private agricultural organisations. With the loss of state support for private farmers, agriculture faced declining production figures. The already shrinking livestock population declined further, the area of agricultural land decreased and grain production fell by 50%. There was no money to invest in modern machinery. Only the cultivation of sunflowers remained stable. At the same time, farmers began to grow other crops and efficiency was increased in certain sectors.[ citation needed ]
After 2000, land reform in Ukraine was initiated. Due to undesirable effects of the first agricultural reform after the collapse of the Soviet Union, a moratorium on the sale of agricultural land was imposed in 2002 to put a stop to the large-scale purchase of agricultural land by oligarchs. Since at least 2011, farmland was remaining as the only major asset in Ukraine that was not privatised. [37]
An October 2013 report by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine identified the following problems in the agricultural sector, that were to be addressed in the 2013–2020 period: [38]
In March 2020, the Ukrainian parliament lifted a ban on the sale of farmland. [39] [40] The land market was fully opened for the first time since independence on 1 July 2021. [41] [1] In 2020, partly under pressure from the IMF, which would only provide funding if agriculture was reformed, it became possible again to sell agricultural land, albeit temporarily (until 1 January 2024) and subject to conditions such as a maximum size of 100 hectares. However, the 2020 reform is controversial. [42] Meanwhile, the production of grains and oilseeds has increasingly come under the control of large agricultural companies established after 2000. The transition to a more market-oriented environment seems to have been relatively successful, but many smaller companies have disappeared or are projected to disappear. Existing smaller companies often face financial problems, which are frequently resolved by attracting an investor with market knowledge and capital. The general effect has been that farmers lost control over their businesses. [2]
According to some researchers, by 2024 approximately 28% of agricultural land was managed by foreign investors such as NCH Capital, Vanguard Group, Kopernik Global Investors, BNP Asset Management Holding, NN Investment Partners Holdings (subsidiary of Goldman Sachs), and Norges Bank Investment Management. [43]
Since 2014, agricultural activities in Ukraine have been severely disrupted by the illegal Russian annexation of Crimea, and the subsequent outbreak of the War in Donbas, starting the Russo-Ukrainian War. Large-scale Russian theft of Ukrainian grain and other products has taken place in the Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine, while many civilians and businesses were displaced or relocated from them and areas close to the frontlines. [44]
Around the same time, in May 2014, the Colorado potato beetle was becoming something of a plague for farmers in eastern Ukraine. During the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine, the word kolorady, from the Ukrainian and Russian term for Colorado beetle (Ukrainian : жук колорадський, Russian : колорадский жук), gained popularity among Ukrainians as a derogatory term to describe pro-Russian separatists in the Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts (provinces) of Eastern Ukraine. The nickname reflects the similarity of black and orange stripes on St. George's ribbons worn by many of the separatists. [45]
Due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the production, processing and export of agricultural crops has declined significantly. It is estimated that maize and wheat production is approximately 20% lower than in the last year before the war, but the area that cannot be used for agricultural production varies by region. [46] In addition to production, the storage and transport of agricultural products have also been affected by the war.
In 2008, agriculture accounted for 8.29% of Ukraine's GDP and by 2012 had grown to 10.43% of the GDP. Agriculture accounted for $13.98 billion of value added to the economy of Ukraine in 2012. Despite being a top 10 world producer of several crops such as wheat and corn Ukraine still only ranks 24 out of 112 nations measured in terms of overall agricultural production. [47] [48]
Professionalised, scientific breeding of barley began in 1910 and as of 2003 supplied improved cultivars to the country. [49] : 34
In 2011, Ukraine was the world's largest producer of sunflower oil, [50] a major global producer of grain and sugar, and a potential global player on meat and dairy markets. It was one of the largest producers of nuts. Ukraine produced more natural honey [51] than any other European country and was one of the world's largest honey producers. An estimated 1.5% of its population was involved in honey production, therefore Ukraine had the highest honey per capita production rate in the world. [52] Because Ukraine possesses 30% of the world's richest black soil, makes its agricultural industry have huge potential.
At the beginning of the 21st century, Ukraine's agricultural industry was highly profitable, generating profit margins of 40–60%. [37] Analysts indicated that the sector had the potential to increase its output by up to four times. [53] Ukraine was the world's 6th largest, 5th if not including the EU as a separate state, producer of corn in the world and the 3rd largest corn exporter in the world. In 2012, Ukraine signed a contract with China, the world's largest importer of corn, to supply China with 3 million tonnes of corn annually at market price. The deal included a $3 billion line of credit extension from China to Ukraine. [54] [55]
In 2014, Ukraine's total grain crop was estimated to be a record 64 million metric tons. In 2014, Ukraine lost control over portions of several regions to Russia, followed by the start of the war in Donbas and the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation, [nb 1] hence the actual available crop yield was closer to 60.5 million metric tons. Due to the decline of the metallurgy industry, which was previously Ukraine's top export category, agricultural products have become Ukraine's largest export category as a result of the war in Donbas. [57]
The Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine reported that in 2016, Ukraine harvested its largest grain crop since independence — 66 million tonnes. The 2015 figure was exceeded by almost 6 million tonnes. In 2016, record grain yields were also set: wheat — 42.1 centners per hectare, rye — 27.3 centners per hectare, maize — 66 centners per hectare, peas — 31.3 centners per hectare. [58]
In 2018:
in addition to smaller productions of other agricultural products. [59] According to government data, as of 2018, the agricultural sector accounts for almost 17% of Ukraine's GDP and generates almost 38% of foreign exchange earnings. [60] By compasiosn: in 2010, agriculture accounted for 8.2% of Ukraine's GDP, and agricultural products accounted for 14.5% of total exports. The agricultural sector employed 15.8% of all workers. [60]
As of 10 November 2023, 71.5 million tonnes of oilseeds and grains have already been harvested in Ukraine during the harvest campaign. [61]
Grain and legumes were harvested on an area of 9.84 million hectares with a yield of 52.1 centners per hectare, including: [61]
As indicated, oilseeds were harvested on an area of 8,096 thousand hectares, yielding 20.2 million tonnes, of which: [61]
10,098,700 tonnes of sugar beet were harvested, with a yield of 477.9 centners per hectare. [61] According to a report by the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine, as of the third week of December 2023, Ukraine had harvested 78.7 million tonnes of new crops, including 57 million tonnes of grain million 859 thousand tonnes of cereals and 20 million 759 thousand tonnes of oilseeds. [62]
As of the end of May 2024, according to a statement by the State Secretary of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine, as a result of full-scale war, about 30% of the total potential of the agricultural sector was destroyed, and almost 20% of agricultural land was occupied. [5] In general, in the two years since the start of the full-scale invasion, Ukraine's agricultural sector has suffered direct losses of more than US$10 billion. [63]
In 2024, Ukraine reached its pre-war export levels of $24.5 billion, which accounted for 59% of total exports, according to a January 2025 Ministry of Agrarian Policy report. [6] In total, Ukraine exported 78.3 million tonnes of agricultural products in 2024. [6] For comparison: in 2021, a historic record was set for agricultural exports, reaching $27.7 billion. [6]
Greece consisted of discrete enclaves on which agriculture was difficult and residents turned to the sea for their livelihood. [...] Athens could not have survived without grain from Ukraine, one reason that Athens feared Persian movements toward the Dardanelles, the Bosporus, and the Black Sea, and maybe the main reason Athens extended so many rights of participatory democracy to lower-class male citizens who served in its navy.
From the mid-1500s one saw the second historical period of European orientation as 'increasing demand for grain on the European markets [led to] Ukraine earning its reputation as the breadbasket of Europe'.