Emigration of Christians from Israel and Palestine refers to the long-term migration of Palestinian Christian communities originating from historic Palestine, particularly from cities such as Bethlehem, Jerusalem, Nazareth, Beit Jala, and Beit Sahour.
Scholars characterize this emigration as a structurally driven phenomenon linked to political conflict, economic pressures, and migration networks, rather than religious persecution. The topic has been misrepresented in propaganda relating to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The phenomenon is part of the wider trend of Palestinian emigration, which has been higher among Christians due to historical circumstances, [1] and part of a wider trend of emigration among Arab Christians. [2] It is considered to be of particular significance because Christianity began in Palestine, and the Palestinian Christian community are considered to be descendants of the first Christians.
Contrary to some politicized claims, the emigration phenomenon is not primarily driven by Muslim-Christian relations. [3]
In a 2020 study, similar factors were noted for emigration of Christian communities in Gaza. [4]
Debates over the causes of Christian emigration from Palestine have become a recurring feature in media coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, in efforts to influence opinion of Christian communities in the West. [5]
In 2006, a draft bill was introduced by Representatives Michael McCaul and Joseph Crowley, drafted by their staffers Ari Stein and Gregg Sheiowitz, [6] which attributed the decline of the Christian population primarily to alleged failures by the Palestinian Authority. [7] According to Professor Daphne Tsimhoni of the Israel Institute of Technology “almost all the bill’s assertions are either exaggerations, misrepresentations or sheer fabrications.” [6] Representatives of churches in Palestine submitted a letter to the U.S. House Committee on International Relations stating that the resolution misrepresented the causes of Christian emigration by emphasizing internal religious or political factors while omitting the impact of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, including movement restrictions and economic constraints. Critics noted that the resolution had been drafted without consultation with Palestinian Christian institutions and risked reinforcing politicized narratives about Christian–Muslim relations in the region. The resolution was quietly withdrawn following the criticism. [8]
In 2012, the CBS News program 60 Minutes aired a report titled “Christians of the Holy Land”, presented by correspondent Bob Simon, examining the decline of Christian communities in Bethlehem, Jerusalem, and surrounding areas. [9] The segment linked emigration to conditions associated with the broader Israeli–Palestinian conflict, including restrictions on movement and economic pressures. Michael Oren, then Israeli ambassador to the United States, attempted to influence CBS to withdraw it prior to publication, arguing that it placed disproportionate blame on Israel. Simon responded by defending the reporting both on air and in subsequent interviews, stating that the segment reflected the testimony of local Christian residents and clergy and was consistent with available historical and empirical research. [10]
The Gazan Christians in this study articulated several primary factors that influenced their motives for migration. The most significant motives involved the negative push factors drawing them away from the Strip and centered on the overwhelming precarity of their experience. This precarity was temporal and spatial in that Gazans were subject to a strict blockade; it was economic in that finding work and providing for families became exceptionally chal-lenging; it was political because they could only envision a stalemate between contending political parties, and it was religious because they were concerned about deteriorating Muslim-Christian relations under Hamas' authority. Gazan Christians were also pulled to the West Bank by the precarity of personal factors. They desired stronger social connections with family and friends outside Gaza, and they needed to address the practical problem of finding marriage partners for young people among a dwindling population. The dominant constellation of Christian interviewees' motives for escaping Gaza included the blockade, the economic collapse, the destructions of wars, the lack of consistent electricity and clean drinking water, and the pervasive sense of despair. Every interviewee explained that these factors played a decisive role in the decision to escape.
The response had an effect: By the end of summer, Crowley and McCaul quietly withdrew the resolution.