Fountain Fire

Fountain Fire
A map of the Fountain Fire's final footprint
Date(s)	August 20 (20-08) – August 28, 1992 (1992-08-28) (9 days)
Location	Shasta County, Northern California, United States
Coordinates	40°45′22″N121°58′08″W / 40.756°N 121.969°W / 40.756; -121.969
Statistics [1] [2]
Burned area	63,960 acres (25,884 ha; 100 sq mi; 259 km2)
Land use	Private timberland
Impacts
Deaths	0
Non-fatal injuries	≥11
Evacuated	7,500
Structures destroyed	636 (330 residential)
Damage	~$127.6 million (equivalent to about $248.8 million in 2023)
Ignition
Cause	Probable arson
Map
Location of the Fountain Fire in Northern California

The 1992 Fountain Fire was a large and destructive wildfire in Shasta County, California. The fire ignited on August 20 in an act of probable but unattributed arson, and was quickly driven northeast by strong winds. It outpaced firefighters for two days, exhibiting extreme behavior such as long-range spot fires, crown fire runs, and pyrocumulonimbus clouds with dry lightning. The fire was contained after burning for nine days, though work to strengthen and repair fire lines continued for more than two months.

The Fountain Fire consumed 63,960 acres (25,880 ha) and destroyed hundreds of homes, primarily in Round Mountain and Montgomery Creek along the State Route 299 corridor. In 1992, it was the third most destructive wildfire in California's recorded history, though it no longer features among the 20 most destructive California wildfires. At a suppression cost of more than $22 million (~$43 million in 2023), it was also for a time the most expensive fire to contain in state history.

At the time, the Fountain Fire was recognized not just as a major disaster, but also as a 'fire of the future'. The devastation the fire left as it moved through private timberlands interspersed with rural communities made it emblematic of the challenges residents and firefighting personnel both face in the wildland-urban interface. The Fountain Fire was surpassed by later California wildfires in metrics for losses, but it remains notable for its speed, its widespread destruction in multiple communities, and the long-term alteration of the landscape within its footprint.

Background

The Fountain Fire burned in eastern Shasta County, part of the southern extent of the Cascade Range. The area was a secondary forest, having entirely regrown after logging in 1886–1923. ^[3] The forest contained mixed conifers, comprising incense cedar, Douglas fir, sugar pine, and ponderosa pine, among other species. Most of the forest that the Fountain Fire burned—65 percent—was owned and managed by timber companies, including Roseburg Forest Products, Sierra Pacific Industries, and Fruit Growers Supply. Only one percent of the forest was owned by the state or the federal government; the other 34 percent belonged to smaller private landowners. ^{[3] [4]}

Climate and weather

Both long-term climatic patterns and short-term weather conditions helped create an environment conducive to a large and uncontrollable wildfire in late August 1992. Between 1987 and 1992, California experienced a six-year drought of a duration and severity not seen in the state since the 1920s and 1930s. Four of these six years ranked in the driest 10 percent of years by runoff. ^{[5] : 53} The stress on forests led to widespread bark beetle infestations. ^{[5] : 57}

Several weeks of high temperatures—equal to or exceeding 100 °F (38 °C) for 22 days—also preceded the fire in Shasta County. ^{[6] [3] : 426} There were also fewer firefighting personnel and equipment available than normal due to an already-active fire season in California; ^[6] during the Fountain Fire's first day four thousand firefighters were deployed on the destructive Old Gulch Fire in Calaveras County. ^[7]

Lastly, a critical fire weather pattern developed in Northern California. The influence of an upper-level trough moving onshore in the Pacific Northwest and a strong upper-level jet situated over Northern California created strong flow out of the southwest and Foehn winds on the eastern slopes of the Cascade Range and the Sierra Nevada. ^[8] Those winds also brought dry air, a result of the dry slot ^[8] —a zone of clear, dry air which often accompanies low-pressure systems. ^[9] The Northern California Geographical Coordination Center identifies this as a typical critical fire weather setup in northeastern California and the southern Cascades: "Pre-frontal conditions occur when strong, southwesterly or westerly winds are generated by the dry, southern tail of a rapidly moving cold front." ^[10] In the Fountain Fire's vicinity on August 20, southwest winds were blowing at speeds of up to 25 miles per hour (40 km/h). ^{[3] : 426}

Progression

August 20

A map of air temperatures in °F at 5:00 p.m. PDT on August 20, the first day of the Fountain Fire, shows high temperatures across California

The Fountain Fire was first spotted by a fire lookout atop Hogback Mountain in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest at about 12:50 p.m. PDT on August 20. ^[6] The lookout reported a smoke column behind a ridge, near a historic drinking fountain along Highway 299 (which gave the incident its name). ^[11] They could not see the actual ignition point of the growing fire, which was confirmed by the Shasta Bear Mountain lookout's cross-check to be about two miles (3.2 km) from the fountain in dry grass off of Buzzard Roost Road, just west of Phillips Road and south of Highway 299. ^{[3] [11] [12] [13]} When a resident of Phillips Road spotted the fire shortly before 1:00 p.m., it was already 30 feet (9.1 m) across and it had climbed into the tree canopy. ^{[14] [15]}

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (then CDF, now Cal Fire) dispatched numerous resources over the next 10 minutes; an observation aircraft arrived overhead by 1:07 p.m., reporting that the fire had already spread to 2–3 acres (0.8–1 ha) and was moving north quickly. Ground personnel arrived at 1:19 p.m., 29 minutes after the first report. ^{[11] [13]} The first two fire engines on the scene were forced to defend an under-construction house that was at risk from blowing embers. ^[16] Firefighters saved multiple homes, but the fire still grew rapidly. ^[11] By 2:17 p.m. the Fountain Fire had burned 40–50 acres (16–20 ha) in its first 90 minutes, and Cal Fire officials later marked this as the point where the fire exceeded the ability of the resources on scene to control it. By 2:50 p.m. these resources included 25 fire engines, ten air tankers, and three helicopters. ^[13] At around 3:30 p.m., per a Roseburg Forest Industries brochure, fire activity intensified still further. ^[17]

Officials initially hoped to hold the fire at Highway 299 outside of Round Mountain, keeping it under 200 acres (81 ha). They were nearly successful, but the high winds drove the fire into brush beneath power lines, which arced, starting multiple spot fires. Firefighters were unable to keep the Fountain Fire from continuing towards the community of Round Mountain. ^[11] Round Mountain, Montgomery Creek, and the small subdivision of Moose Camp were all evacuated around 4:00 p.m. By 4:30 p.m., the fire had crossed Highway 299. ^[18] This was also the approximate time that a new wildfire, the Barker Fire, began in Trinity County and further stretched firefighting resources in Northern California. ^[13]

The Fountain Fire's northeastern push developed into an intense crown fire, with flame lengths of up to 300 feet (91 m) that kept ground crews from safely engaging. ^[11] The wind helped embers ignite spot fires at least one mile (1.6 km) ahead of the main fire. ^[19] The pyrocumulonimbus plume generated by the Fountain Fire reached at least 25,000 feet (7,600 m) in altitude, as detected by weather radars in Medford, Oregon, and generated numerous lightning strikes. The 50–70-mile-per-hour (80–113 km/h) jet stream blowing out of the west created a chimney effect when it met the billowing smoke plume, ventilating the fire and increasing fire behavior. ^[20]

A closer view of the fire's footprint and the Highway 299 corridor

A Forest Service meteorologist speculated that, based on witness reports and debris, intense fire-generated vortices developed in the Fountain Fire. ^[21] A National Weather Service meteorologist in Redding assigned to the incident concurred, noting that investigators found pine trees two to three feet (0.61 to 0.91 m) in diameter snapped in half by possible "fire tornadoes". ^{[16] [20]} Such vortices have been recorded in other Northern California wildfires, including the 2014 Eiler Fire near Hat Creek and the 2018 Carr Fire on the outskirts of the city of Redding. ^{[21] [22]}

As the fire swept through the community of Round Mountain, it burned at temperatures of up to 2,000 °F (1,090 °C), melting a cast-iron bathtub, stainless steel knives, chrome car bumpers, glass bottles, and even cooking potatoes growing underground. ^{[23] [24]} No one was killed or severely injured when the fire front pushed through the town, but multiple people drove out through the flames or left their properties just before the fire reached them. ^[17]

By 5:00 p.m., fifteen people were trapped in an 80-acre (32 ha) meadow at the end of Frisby Road after flames blocked the way out to Highway 299. The McMillan family, ranchers and owners of the meadow property, had planned to go there in case of a fire and were able to wet the area down with water trucks and flood it by blocking irrigation ditches. The group remained there as the fire moved through with 200-foot (61 m) flame lengths, blowing the roofs off of nearby barns with the force of its passage. Two men put out spot fires with a bulldozer. A helicopter looking for people who had not evacuated eventually discovered the group, surrounded by flames. It was able to land and extricate two women and a two-year-old child, but could not return. Firefighters could not safely reach the remaining people and evacuate them until 10:00 p.m., five hours after they had taken refuge in the meadow. ^[24]

Meanwhile, the fire continued moving north and east: by midnight, the fire had pushed further along the Highway 299 corridor and was south of Montgomery Creek. By then it had burned approximately 12,000 acres (4,900 ha) and forced 1,000–2,000 people to evacuate. ^[18]

August 21

The following day marked the single largest day of growth for the Fountain Fire as similar weather conditions continued to fuel extreme fire behavior. At one point the fire burned 80 acres (32 ha) every minute and spread at a rate of six miles per hour (9.7 km/h). ^{[6] [16]} This growth was enabled by more long-range spotting, as wind-borne embers started spot fires between one-quarter mile (0.40 km) and two miles (3.2 km) ahead of the main body of the fire. ^[25]

In the morning, fire crews focused on protecting Montgomery Creek by attempting to stop one branch of the fire's advance at Fenders Ferry Road off of Highway 299, south of the community and north of Round Mountain. While firefighters were able to protect many structures along the road, they were unable to prevent the winds (a combination of continuing gusts from the southwest and inflow winds towards the Fountain Fire's massive plume to the east) from pushing the flames across the road. ^[26] This happened shortly after noon, and the fire then pressed towards Montgomery Creek. The fire entered the center of the community along Highway 299 by 3:00 p.m. Multiple homes were destroyed, but firefighters protected the local school, post office, and other major structures with assistance from aircraft. ^[27]

Meanwhile, the larger head of the fire to the east continued advancing, forcing the communities of Big Bend, Hillcrest, and Moose Camp to be evacuated. ^[27] The fire burned through Moose Camp—a community of 60 summer cabins and several permanent homes—later that day, leaving about 20 cabins standing. ^[28] By 6:00 p.m. on August 21, the larger town of Burney was placed under a voluntary evacuation advisory. California Highway Patrol officers used bullhorns to warn residents, and the Red Cross shelter that had been established there was also forced to move. ^[29]

The fire moved so quickly and fiercely that firefighters did not expect to be able to stop it short of where the conifer forests gave way to old lava beds east of Burney. ^[12] By dusk, the fire had advanced all the way to Hatchet Mountain and Hatchet Mountain Pass, damaging radio equipment on the mountain's summit. Flames were visible from Burney. ^[27] By 10:00 p.m., the fire front was within 1.5 miles (2.4 km) of the town, and had set a log deck on fire at Sierra Pacific Industries' mill on its western outskirts. ^[29] However, once the Fountain Fire crested the hills west of Burney, it was no longer in alignment with the wind and up-slope terrain that had driven it along the Highway 299 corridor for the previous 36 hours. ^[20] By midnight, the fire had burned more than 35,000 acres (14,000 ha) in total. ^[27]

August 22 onwards

The Fountain Fire's behavior and growth over its first two days were sobering to firefighters. On August 22, the third day of the fire, Cal Fire deputy incident commander Bill Clayton predicted that the fire would grow to 100,000 acres (40,000 ha). ^[30] A memo posted for crews read: "The fire has moved 7 miles in 6.5 hours the first day, faster the second day (Friday). Prepare for more of the same today. It is critically dry, fueled with variable winds, has produced rapid fire runs and heavy spotting which have ran out crews many times." ^[25]

However, August 22 ended up bringing much more moderate weather conditions and fire behavior. Cooler temperatures and lighter winds allowed firefighters to gain ground. That morning, firefighters lit backfires off Highway 299 near Hatchet Mountain to prepare and strengthen control lines. ^[31] This tactic was repeated in the afternoon as the fire closed to within one mile (1.6 km) of Burney. By the end of the day, it was clear that the head of the fire was progressing to the northeast of Burney and not towards it, ^[25] and the Forest Service was calling the fire 30 percent contained. ^[32]

During the 22nd and 23rd, the flanks of the fire remained problematic: the fire moved both northeast towards the Pit River and southwest towards Oak Run and other communities. ^{[33] [34] [35]} Stopping the Fountain Fire from crossing the Pit River was a high priority, as officials cited the steepness of the terrain beyond it, dense fuels, and the high resource values (such as old-growth forests and endangered spotted owl habitat) that would be at risk if it crossed. ^{[28] [31] [36]} In that case, officials feared a "whole new ball game" with "uncontrollable" fire conditions. ^[31] Crews were aided on that side by strong winds from the north, though the same winds made containing the southern flank more difficult. ^[28] Residents of Round Mountain and Montgomery Creek were briefly allowed to return to their properties. ^[31]

Before dawn on August 24, low humidity and winds of up to 25 miles per hour (40 km/h) prompted a red flag warning for much of Northern California and also caused the fire to briefly become more active, jumping the fire line into the drainage of Cow Creek. ^[37] Some evacuation orders were re-issued, including for Oak Run and Mill Creek, but the fire did not burn any more structures and by that afternoon it was 40 percent contained in all. ^[35]

The winds failed to re-materialize on the 25th, though the weather remained hot and dry. Firefighters constructed firebreaks by hand in the Pit River canyon, in terrain so rugged that bulldozers could not operate and described by a Shasta-Trinity National Forest spokesperson as "steeper than a cow's face." ^{[36] [38]} Big Bend, Moose Camp, and Hillcrest alone remained under mandatory evacuation orders. ^[14] Firefighter reported re-burning and flare-ups of activity near unburned islands (ranging from 30–400 acres (12–162 ha)) of vegetation and structures within the fire. ^{[39] : 61} By midday on August 26 the fire was 75 percent contained. ^[36] On August 27 it remained hot and dry but with calm winds. ^{[39] : 63}

On August 28, the Fountain Fire was declared 100 percent contained, having burned a total area just shy of 64,000 acres (26,000 ha). ^[40] Firefighters continued to monitor 12,000 acres (4,900 ha) of unburned vegetation within the perimeter that risked reigniting, primarily on Hatchet Mountain and Lookout Mountain. ^[41] The fire was officially declared controlled on November 1. ^{[42] [lower-alpha 1]} Other fire suppression operations continued until mid-November. ^[44]

Firefighting effort

Further information: 1992 California budget crisis

A deadlock between the Democratic California state legislature and Republican governor Pete Wilson meant that the state was without a budget between July 1 and September 3 in 1992, and consequently forced to pay many state employees or contractors in official IOUs during that period. ^{[45] [46]} These included Cal Fire firefighters on the Fountain Fire, many of whom bought and wore T-shirts that displayed the names of major fires, a "beleaguered firefighter", and the words "All this for an IOU?" ^[47]

On August 23 the Fountain Fire was reported to be short of 105 wildland firefighters (equivalent to seven handcrews) primarily because of resources taken up by the Old Gulch Fire in Calaveras County. There were also fewer replacements in part because the budget stalemate meant that fire departments throughout the state were in some cases unwilling to send their idle units, worried about potential budget cuts and the need to maintain their own operations in the face of uncertain funding and reimbursement. ^[48]

At the peak of the suppression effort, around 4,464 personnel—of whom at least 600 were California Conservation Camp Program prison inmates paid one dollar per day—worked to fight the fire. ^{[17] [23]} Firefighters worked shifts as long as 24 hours. ^[28] The Shasta County fairgrounds in the town of Anderson, south of Redding, served as the main base camp for firefighters. ^[49] On Sunday, August 23 alone, air tankers dropped 212,000 gallons of fire retardant, a then-record for the Forest Service air attack base in Redding. ^[50] Aircraft, including Grumman S2Fs and Lockheed P-3 Orions, dropped over 740,000 gallons of fire retardant in total and were joined by at least 15 water-dropping helicopters and more than 470 ground vehicles. ^{[17] [51]} A Cal Fire official described the air attack fleet as "larger than the Peruvian Air Force." ^[51] When suppression was complete the Fountain Fire had become the then-most expensive wildfire to contain in recorded California history, at a total cost of more than $22 million (equivalent to about $43 million in 2023). ^{[44] [16] [52]}

Criticism and response

Many residents who lost their homes in the Fountain Fire afterwards expressed criticisms of the firefighting effort. ^[53] They argued that the firefighters should have cut more and larger fire lines between the flames and Montgomery Creek, and that crews did not defend structures that could have been saved. They also contended that many resources stood idle without orders for too long before engaging the fire or refused to engage at all. ^{[26] [54]} Multiple residents believed their homes were destroyed in backfires set by firefighters to slow the main fire. ^[55] A Cal Fire battalion chief was assaulted during the fire by a man who reportedly disagreed with the way it was being fought. ^[54] Eventually, in November, more than 200 residents attended a meeting to air their disagreements over Cal Fire's efforts. Representatives for area politicians, including for U.S. House Representative Wally Herger, attended. ^[55]

Fire officials pushed back on these criticisms, asserting primarily that fire behavior was so intense that losses were unavoidable: many structures lay at the end of long driveways adjacent to heavy vegetation and could not have been safely protected. ^[53] They also argued that without the context of internal communications, firefighters running out of water and leaving to get more was likely misinterpreted as abandoning structure defense. Finally, they pointed to at least 228 buildings that had been saved as evidence of their success in the face of the adverse conditions. ^[26] One firefighter noted the challenges posed by the Fountain Fire burning largely in privately-owned forests: firefighters could have built fire lines and conduct firing operations wherever they chose in national forests, but not on land under private ownership and with power line. ^[25]

The Rural Fire Protection in America Steering Committee interviewed fire officials, though not local residents, and produced a report analyzing Cal Fire's initial mobilization for the Fountain Fire. The report was favorable, though it noted that during the fire's early stages radio frequencies were overloaded and firefighters generally lacked good information on which homes were or were not defensible. ^{[56] [57]}

In March 1993, about 400 people attended a hearing on the fire held in Redding by the California State Senate Committee for Natural Resources and Wildlife. ^[58] In the same month, Cal Fire also released its own internal report on the Fountain Fire. Issued by a four-member committee of Northern California fire chiefs and officers, it relied on interviews with 24 different fire officials (but no victims). ^{[13] [59]} The Cal Fire report was again mostly favorable to the agency, but listed several areas for improvement. It concluded that during the first 48 hours of the fire there were too few managers for the amount of equipment (the result of budget reductions and fires elsewhere), as well as serious communications issues. ^[13] During the fire, 72 amateur ham radio operators had coordinated closely with Cal Fire and other agencies in the absence of telephone access. ^[60] The report also criticized private firefighting equipment operators who showed up to the fire in hopes of being hired on the spot, causing confusion among officials who did not want responsibility for potentially unqualified operators. On the other hand, the committee report noted that 60 percent of the homes in the area of the Fountain Fire fell short of state standards for wildfire safety, including construction, brush clearance, and water access. The fire could not have been stopped given the windy conditions, most of the homes destroyed were indefensible, and the area was "a disaster waiting to happen", the report concluded. ^[13]

State audit

In 1994, Cal Fire Director Richard A. Wilson ordered a series of audits of the agency's spending on wildfires, prompted by that year's expensive fire season. The first audit focused on the Fountain Fire. ^[61] Some news articles seized on purchases made during the fire deemed extravagant, such as an order for more than 1,800 pounds (820 kg) of honey, as well as large bills for coffee, hotel rooms for firefighters, paperwork, and other goods and services. ^[44] More systematically, the audit criticized the use of large and expensive helicopters and air tankers, and the disparity in compensation between very low-paid inmate firefighters (who did much of the difficult and dangerous physical labor on the fire line) and their correctional officers/supervisors. ^[61]

Cause

Investigators pinpointed the precise spot where the fire started, using forensic techniques that even included examining the "pattern of charring on cow patties". ^[36] They used satellite data to confirm that there had been no recent lightning strikes nearby, and traffic patterns to rule out a sparks from a vehicle's exhaust or a hot catalytic converter. No downed power lines were found at the site; ^[36] nor indeed was any ignition source found at the fire's origin location, including matches, cigarette butts, or a "trace of exhaust carbon from machinery". ^[62]

These methods led investigators to announce on August 25 that the cause of the Fountain Fire was probable arson. ^[12] A Cal Fire spokesperson declared that "the probability is that someone used a match or cigarette lighter to ignite the fire and took it with them." ^[62] Secret Witness, a non-profit organization, offered a $10,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the responsible party. ^[63] Cal Fire investigators followed about 50 leads, with none leading to an arrest. The statute of limitations for prosecuting the presumed act of arson expired three years later in 1995, though Cal Fire said then that it would continue investigating, with a spokesperson noting that "If a person has ignited one fire, they may have lit them before or they may light them later." A new California arson statute with harsher penalties and a longer statute of limitations was enacted in 1994 but did not apply retroactively. ^[62]

No precise motive or perpetrator was ever determined, though one federal prosecutor told The Sacramento Bee in 1994 that he believed it was economic arson committed by someone intending to make money from the fire suppression effort. This was a motive linked to several other fires in Northern California at the time, some of which resulted in indictments. ^[64]

Effects

Casualties

No deaths were directly caused by the fire. However, three loggers—Melvin Bentley, Donald Hendrickson, and Steve Horton Tyler—were killed in separate incidents during salvage logging operations in the burn area; they are commemorated on a Fountain Fire historical marker. ^[65] On October 15, Bentley was killed when he was struck by a partially-burned limb that fell from a tree as he took a break beneath it. On November 2, Hendrickson, a skidder operator, was hit by a falling snag and died after being airlifted to a Redding hospital. ^[66] Tyler died almost a year later, on July 15, 1993, after being run over by a tractor he was operating. ^[67] At least two other workers were seriously injured during Fountain Fire salvage logging, both of them struck in the head by trees that snapped back after being pinned down by other falling trees. ^[66]

There were also at least 11 firefighter injuries during the fire itself. ^[68] One firefighter was struck by a falling branch, and another broke an ankle. ^{[69] [12]} At least three state prison inmates were also injured, including one who suffered a broken leg. ^[38] One firefighter was forced to deploy their fire shelter when overcome by flames while trying to protect a house. ^[12] There were also substantial livestock losses, with entire herds of swine and cattle killed. ^[70]

Closures and evacuations

The fire caused Highway 299 to close from Oak Run in the west to Four Corners in the east, and Highway 89 to close from Highway 44 in the south to Interstate 5 in the north. ^[36] Highway 299 reopened on August 29, following the removal of hazardous trees and the replacement of around 300 burned guard rail posts. ^[71] McArthur-Burney Falls Memorial State Park, home to Burney Falls, was closed when the evacuation warning for Burney was issued and thereafter used as a camp for firefighters. ^[72] In total, about 7,500 people were forced to evacuate because of the Fountain Fire. ^[73] The majority of these evacuees were able to return to their homes on August 22, leaving 2,000–3,000 still displaced from Moose Camp, Montgomery Creek, Hillcrest, and Round Mountain. ^[32] Some residents of burned areas were able to access their properties on August 23 and 24. By August 25, Big Bend, Moose Camp, and Hillcrest were the only communities still under mandatory evacuation orders, ^[14] and almost all evacuees were able to return by August 28. ^[40] At least two Shasta County residents were convicted of burglary for looting an evacuated home in Oak Run. ^[74]

Damage

The Fountain Fire destroyed 636 structures. ^[1] Homes accounted for 330 of them, with the remainder being commercial structures or outbuildings such as barns or sheds. Another 78 homes were damaged. ^[2] The fire burned part of the elementary school in Round Mountain, including its auditorium and library. ^[23] The Hill Country Community Clinic also burned down, leaving the nearest physician 30 miles away in Redding. ^[75] The California Office of Emergency Services preliminarily estimated the cost of the Fountain Fire's damage to private property at $105.6 million (equivalent to about $205.9 million in 2023). This estimate—made the day the fire was contained—included almost $18 million in residential losses, almost $2 million in commercial losses, and $86 million in timber losses. ^[2] At the time, the Fountain Fire was the third most destructive wildfire in recorded California history (after the Oakland firestorm of 1991 and the 1990 Painted Cave Fire in Santa Barbara), ^{[1] [17]} though it no longer ranks among the top 20 most destructive California wildfires. ^[76]

The communities affected were economically vulnerable before the fire; as much as 90 percent of the populations of Round Mountain, Montgomery Creek, and nearby areas relied on some sort of public assistance. Jobs were often seasonal or dependent on tourism. The Red Cross estimated that 3/4ths of all those who lost their homes in the fire lacked insurance. ^[77]

The fire also damaged much of rural Shasta County's basic infrastructure. All of eastern Shasta County lost power when the Fountain Fire burned the Cedar Creek PG&E substation in Round Mountain. More than 150,000 feet (46,000 m) of telephone cable operated by Citizens Utilities was burned. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) was forced to replace 45,000 feet (14,000 m) feet of electrical distribution lines, repair 150 miles (240 km) of transmission lines, and replace approximately 300 wooden power line poles that had burned. ^[78]

At the time, fire officials highlighted the Fountain Fire as a "fire of the future", connecting the destruction of the wildfire to California's growing population, particularly in the wildland-urban interface. ^{[79] [80]} A Cal Fire spokesperson called fires like it "the price we pay for living where we choose to live". ^[80] By 1992, more than 1,000 building permits were being issued every year outside of cities and towns in Shasta County. ^[16] Firefighters recalled the first two fire engines on the scene being forced to defend a structure in the path of the Fountain Fire instead of suppressing the fire directly, ^[80] and emphasized the lack of sufficient vegetation clearance around most structures. ^[26]

An article ran in the Paradise Post two weeks after the Fountain Fire, noting that the city of Paradise, California was susceptible to a similar wildfire, with its comparable geography, fuels, and climate. ^[81] In 2018 most of Paradise burned to the ground in an urban firestorm when the wind-driven Camp Fire blew through, killing 85 people and destroying more than 18,000 structures to become California's deadliest and most destructive wildfire. ^[82]

Environmental impacts

The smoke plume from the Fountain Fire gradually drifted southwest over the Bay Area and California coast, including Sonoma, Mendocino, Lake, and Napa counties; it prompted hundreds of calls to fire departments in Santa Cruz, Scotts Valley, and elsewhere on August 22 and 23 from people who thought the smoke came from a local fire. ^{[83] [84]}

Various local flora and fauna were threatened by the fire. The fire approached critical habitats for the endangered and protected northern spotted owl and California spotted owl. ^[85] The fire also threatened the only known populations of the Shasta snow-wreath, a rare deciduous shrub only recognized as an undiscovered species by botanists in May 1992, just months before the Fountain Fire—but the plants survived. ^[86] A biologist for the California Department of Fish and Game predicted potential major impacts on local fish populations. ^[87]

In a report for the Forest Foundation that advocated for thinning forests and post-fire replanting, retired forestry professor Thomas Bonnicksen used a Forest Carbons and Emissions Model (FCEM) to calculate that more than 13 million tons of carbon dioxide were released through combustion and decay in the Fountain Fire—equivalent to more than 17 percent of annual passenger vehicle emissions in California in 2005. ^[88] However, the report received pushback: it was never peer-reviewed, and California Air Resources Board and Forest Service officials critiqued it as probably overestimating the amount of emissions. Other critics noted Bonnicksen's alignment with the timber industry. ^[89]

Political response

Shasta County Sheriff Jim Pope declared a local emergency on August 21, the day after the fire had begun and burned through Round Mountain. ^[18] On the same day, Governor Wilson declared a state of emergency in Shasta County. ^[90] On August 22, U.S. House Representative Wally Herger toured the disaster area and called for a federal disaster declaration from President George H. W. Bush. ^[31] President Bush then authorized federal relief for Shasta County on August 29. ^{[91] [92]} Shasta County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) agreed to drop all fees for fire victims seeking to rebuild their homes, and FEMA funded an additional building inspector for rebuilding efforts in the fire area for 18 months. ^[93] Democratic Party U.S. Senate candidate Dianne Feinstein visited Redding on September 1 for her campaign, receiving a briefing at the incident command post in Anderson and a tour of the fire's footprint via helicopter. ^[94]

Post-fire landscape

A 1992 false-color Landsat/USGS image shows part of Northern California, with the burn scar visible in the upper right-hand corner

Before the Fountain Fire the predominant forest cover type in the area was Sierra Nevada mixed conifer, with Pacific Ponderosa pine cover at lower elevations. Tree species included ponderosa pine, sugar pine, Douglas fir, white fir, incense cedar, and California black oak, while the understory was dominated by manzanita and Ceanothus species. ^[3] The fire largely burned at a high severity, and killed much of the vegetation within its footprint. ^{[16] [95]}

In the weeks after the fire, Cal Fire conducted reseeding operations via helicopter, spreading 42 tons of native grass seeds over more than 5,000 acres (2,000 ha) judged prone to erosion. ^[96] Timber companies built stream buffers and check dams in vulnerable waterways. ^[3] Erosion concerns were borne out when a large autumn storm at the end of October brought rockslides and debris down onto Highway 299 in the burn area, temporarily blocking it. ^[97] The following spring, rain on the hydrophobic soil (ash leaving it unable to absorb water) carved deep gullies, carried off topsoil, and washed roads out across the county. ^[98]

Salvage logging

A NASA Terra satellite image from 2001 shows the salvage-logged burn scar from the Fountain Fire

The vast majority of the area burned by the Fountain Fire was privately owned. Of the nearly 64,000 acres (26,000 ha) burned, 41 percent (more than 25,000 acres (10,000 ha)) belonged to Roseburg Forest Products, 15 percent (more than 9,000 acres (3,600 ha)) to Sierra Pacific Industries, and nine percent to Fruit Growers Supply. Thirty-four percent belonged to small private landowners, and one percent belonged to the state or federal government. In total, 41,300 acres (16,700 ha) of the burn area were under industrial ownership. ^[3]

California's Forest Practices Act permits timber companies to quickly harvest burned trees without first submitting thorough timber harvest plans to the state, in a practice called salvage logging. ^[99] Salvage logging is an environmentally controversial but profitable enterprise for timber companies. ^[100] After the Fountain Fire, Roseburg was able to keep multiple sawmills in Northern California open to process the salvaged wood, temporarily saving hundreds of jobs and prolonging the mills' lives by months when they had previously been slated to close over new environmental restrictions on logging public lands. ^[99] By the end of the salvage logging effort in 1993, 600 million board feet of timber had been harvested from the burned trees, as well as 913,000 tons of wood chips for biomass power plant fuel. ^[101]

In 1977, 10 families belonging to the Pit River Tribe of Native Americans had occupied Smith Camp (a defunct logging camp), claiming ancestral rights to the surrounding land. Roseburg Forest Products, which acquired the land in 1979 from another logging company, left the group undisturbed in the hopes that they would eventually leave. When the Fountain Fire burned through the area, it also destroyed the structures at Smith Camp, and Roseburg refused to authorize FEMA to place trailers there for the Native group to live in while they rebuilt. Roseburg also sought to conduct salvage logging operations on the land, and was resisted. The Native Americans demanded the legal title to the Smith Camp property, supported by the Pit River Tribal Council. ^{[102] [103]}

Herbicide application and replanting

Roseburg and the other timber companies sprayed the land slated for replanting with herbicides, such as hexazinone, intended to suppress brush growth that might compete with replanted conifer saplings. ^{[104] [105]} Local residents organized a rally at a creek in the proposed spraying area with more than 100 attendees, worried about potential environmental contamination and side effects from the herbicides. Company officials dismissed concerns, arguing that the chemicals were known to be safe. ^[106]

Logging companies began to replant in the spring of 1993, about seven months after the fire, ^[3] and those efforts continued for five years. ^[4] Roseburg planted "a combination of ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir, and white fir with 10-foot spacing." ^[3] The scale of the replanting was significant: Roseburg Forest Industries planted 10 million seedlings, Sierra Pacific Industries planted three million, and Fruit Growers Supply Co. and W.M. Beaty and Associates planted the remaining four million, ^[107] for a total of 17 million seedlings replanted in the burn area. ^{[4] [107]} The replanted trees are estimated to reach maturity at 100 feet (30 m) in height by 2065, ^[108] although the growing forest is less varied than the second-growth forest that burned in the fire. ^[4]

Fountain Wind Project

Wildfire concerns in the Fountain Fire's footprint also helped sink a contentious large wind farm project proposed for timberland property west of Burney and north of Highway 299. Known as the Fountain Wind project and proposed by energy firm ConnectGEN LLC, the project would have included up to 71 wind turbines, 679 feet (207 m) tall, with the capacity to generate 216 megawatts of electricity. ^[109] The project's location within a high wildfire hazard zone, as evidenced by the Fountain Fire, was cited by opposing residents as a reason to deny approval to the project. They argued that the turbines could ignite fires (either by malfunctioning or by attracting lightning), would require significant vegetation clearance, and would make aerial firefighting more difficult. Officials with the Fountain Wind project argued that it would serve as a large-scale fuel break between the communities along Highway 299. ^[110] A report by Shasta County's fire chief noted that the turbines would present an obstacle to aerial firefighting operations, but would not totally prevent them. It also described the help that the access roads cleared of vegetation would provide to crews. ^[109] In 2021, the Shasta County Planning Commission voted unanimously to reject the project's use permit, followed by an appeal to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors that was denied in a 4–1 vote to deny the appeal. Wildfire risks and firefighting challenges, among other issues, were given as a primary reason for the rejection. ^[111]

See also

Other notable arson-caused and/or destructive wildfires in Shasta County:

• Ponderosa Fire (2012)
• Clover Fire (2013)
• Salt Fire (2021)
• Fawn Fire (2021)

References

Notes

1. 'Containment' and 'control' of a wildfire are technical terms used by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire). A wildfire is contained when it is completely encircled by control lines (including fire breaks, burned-out areas, and natural features). A wildfire is controlled when it is contained and has been extinguished such that it no longer threatens to spread any further. ^[43]

Citations

1. "20 Largest California Wildland Fires (By Structures Lost)". California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2001. Archived from the original on October 31, 2001. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
2. Jenkins, Don (August 29, 1992). "Fire damage estimated at $105 million". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
3. Zhang, Jianwei; Webster, Jeff; Powers, Robert F.; Mills, John (2008). "Reforestation after the Fountain Fire in northern California: an untold success story" (PDF). Journal of Forestry . 106 (8): 425–430. doi:10.1093/jof/106.8.425. ISSN   0022-1201. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023– via United States Forest Service.
4. Darling, Dylan (August 20, 2007). "Forest a different mix since blaze destroyed flora". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 3. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 14, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
5. California's Most Significant Droughts: Comparing Historical and Recent Conditions (PDF) (Report). California Department of Water Resources. February 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2022. Retrieved February 24, 2024– via California Water Library.
6. Darling, Dylan (August 20, 2007). "Embers to ashes: Fountain Fire's 15th anniversary recalls destruction". Redding Record Searchlight . Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
7. "Northern California fires force 16,000 from homes". The Washington Post. August 21, 1992. Archived from the original on October 11, 2023. Retrieved October 11, 2023.
8. "GACC: Northern California Critical Fire Weather Patterns". Program for Climate, Ecosystem and Fire Applications (CEFA). Desert Research Institute. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
9. "NOAA's National Weather Service – Glossary: Dry Slot". forecast.weather.gov. NOAA, National Weather Service. Archived from the original on January 14, 2024. Retrieved February 24, 2024. A zone of dry (and relatively cloud-free) air which wraps east- or northeastward into the southern and eastern parts of a synoptic scale or mesoscale low pressure system. A dry slot generally is seen best on satellite photographs.
10. "Northern California Fire Behavior Assessment" (PDF). Northern California Geographic Coordination Center. National Interagency Fire Center. July 7, 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2017.
11. Breitler, Alex (August 18, 2002). "Rising from the ashes: Mountain communities heal after vicious blaze". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 6. Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
12. Lemos, Judi (August 26, 1992). "Arsonist blamed for fire". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 8. Archived from the original on November 3, 2022. Retrieved November 3, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
13. Jenkins, Don (March 10, 1993). "Report supports CDF fire effort". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
14. Lemos, Judi (August 25, 1992). "Firefighters get a break from winds". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 8. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 26, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
15. Jenkins, Don (August 27, 1992). "Fire still a threat to jump Pit River". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 3, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
16. Sugg, Diana (August 25, 1992). "Drought made summer's fires fiercer, officials say". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  16, 19. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
17. Jennings, Ralph (August 17, 1997). "The Fountain Fire". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 4. Archived from the original on November 1, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
18. Ward, Robert; Lemos, Judi (August 21, 1992). "Homes lost to raging fire: Small town mostly ashes after inferno". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 8. Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
19. "One Fire Is Tamed; Another Burns Town". The New York Times . Reuters. August 22, 1992. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
20. Holquist, Robert C. (June 1, 1993). "Mixture of wind, fuel can whip up firestorm". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 6. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 25, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
21. Benda, David (August 23, 2018). "Destructive and deadly, yes. But unprecedented? Trying to understand the Carr fire twister". Redding Record Searchlight . Archived from the original on December 5, 2022. Retrieved October 25, 2022.
22. Lareau, Neil P.; Nauslar, Nicholas J.; Bentley, Evan; Roberts, Matthew; Emmerson, Samuel; Brong, Brian; Mehle, Matthew; Wallman, James (May 14, 2022). "Fire-Generated Tornadic Vortices". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society . 103 (5): E1296–E1320. Bibcode:2022BAMS..103E1296L. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0199.1 . ISSN   0003-0007.
23. Paddock, Richard C.; McMillan, Penelope (August 24, 1992). "Shasta Residents Return; Fire Threat Easing". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
24. Winship, George (November 26, 1992). "Safety zone: Lucky survivors recall the terror of Fountain Fire". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 16. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 26, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
25. Hardy, Charles C.; Lucas, Charlotte-Anne; Brazil, Eric (August 23, 1992). "Fire crews pushed to limit". The San Francisco Examiner . Contributions by Elizabeth Fernandez. pp.  1, 13. Archived from the original on November 3, 2022. Retrieved November 3, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
26. Jenkins, Don (September 22, 1992). "Some say fire losses were preventable". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 25. Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
27. Jenkins, Don; Holquist, Robert C. (August 22, 1992). "Fire nears Burney". Redding Record Searchlight . Bobby Calvan and George Winship contributed. pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on November 6, 2022. Retrieved November 6, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
28. Hayward, Brad; Vogel, Nancy (August 24, 1992). "Fires continue rampage in Shasta, Trinity counties". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 3, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
29. Camposeco, Maria E.; Breton, Marcos (August 22, 1992). "7,500 flee as blaze ravages Shasta". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  1, 20. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 30, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
30. Furillo, Andy; Camposeco, Maria E. (August 23, 1992). "Dozer crews building huge line around fire". The Press Democrat . McClatchy News Service. pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
31. Lemos, Judi; Ward, Robert (August 23, 1992). "Burney OK, but blaze grows". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
32. Paddock, Richard C.; Lichtblau, Eric (August 23, 1992). "Thousands Flee Wildfire in Drought-Stricken Shasta County". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on July 17, 2024. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
33. "Rain and Reinforcements Help Idaho Firefighters". The New York Times . Associated Press. August 24, 1992. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
34. "Rain, Snow Aids Idaho Firefighters, Calif. Fires Rage On". The Associated Press . August 23, 1992. Archived from the original on October 12, 2022. Retrieved November 10, 2022.
35. "Winds Breathe New Life Into 64,000-Acre Wildfire". Los Angeles Times . August 25, 1992. p. 24. Archived from the original on November 1, 2022. Retrieved November 1, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
36. Dougan, Michael; Hatfield, Larry D. (August 26, 1992). "Firefighters gain upper hand". The San Francisco Examiner . Contributions by John Flinn. p. 5. Archived from the original on November 1, 2022. Retrieved November 1, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
37. Hayward, Brad; Vogel, Nancy (August 25, 1992). "Stubborn Shasta fire jumps lines". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  1, 8. Archived from the original on November 8, 2022. Retrieved November 8, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
38. Bowman, Chris; Hayward, Brad (August 26, 1992). "Arson suspected in Shasta County blaze". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  13, 16. Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
39. "Fire Management Situation Reports, August 1992" (PDF). National Interagency Coordination Center – Incident Management Situation Report Archives. National Interagency Fire Center. August 1992. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 7, 2022. Retrieved November 8, 2022.
40. "Firefighters have a good day in the West". United Press International . August 28, 1992. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
41. "Fountain Fire refuses to die: Islands of unburned vegetation still a worry". Redding Record Searchlight . September 1, 1992. p. 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 9, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
42. Jenkins, Don (August 20, 1993). "Aftermath: Returning to life". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 8. Archived from the original on November 17, 2022. Retrieved November 17, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
43. Hassan, Adeel (July 28, 2022). "Wildfire Terms Defined: What It Means When a Blaze Is 30 Percent Contained". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 30, 2023. Retrieved October 11, 2023.
44. Philp, Tom (November 29, 1994). "From hotels to honey, it all adds up". The Sacramento Bee . p. 16. Archived from the original on November 8, 2022. Retrieved November 8, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
45. Reinhold, Robert (July 2, 1992). "California Forced to Turn to I.O.U.'S". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 26, 2022.
46. Reinhold, Robert (September 3, 1992). "63 Days After Its Cash Ran Out, California Passes Austere Budget". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 26, 2022.
47. "Fire crews are hot about state's IOUs". Redding Record Searchlight . August 27, 1992. p. 10. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 25, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
48. Tom, Dara (August 23, 1992). "Budget uncertainties leave some fires dangerously understaffed". The Lompoc Record . Associated Press. p. 2. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
49. Lucas, Charlotte-Anne (August 30, 1992). "Fighting fire with fire sale". The San Francisco Examiner . pp.  49, 53. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
50. Scarborough, Stasia (August 25, 1992). "Air tankers hit blaze at record pace". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 27. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 26, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
51. Dougan, Michael (August 26, 1992). "Off they go, into the wild brown yonder". The San Francisco Examiner . p. 5. Archived from the original on November 1, 2022. Retrieved November 1, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
52. Camposeco, Maria E. (August 15, 1993). "Shasta battling back from blaze". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  1, 16. Archived from the original on November 1, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
53. "Fountain Fire zone residents want investigation". Redding Record Searchlight . McClatchy News Service. November 5, 1922. pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 10, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
54. Anderson, Lorena (November 7, 1992). "Fire victims burned up with CDF". Paradise Post . pp.  1, 7. Archived from the original on November 8, 2022. Retrieved November 8, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
55. Jenkins, Don (November 19, 1992). "Residents of Fountain Fire want CDF probed". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 10, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
56. Jenkins, Don (January 16, 1993). "Report lauds beleaguered CDF in Fountain Fire actions". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 8. Retrieved November 8, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
57. Fountain Fire – a Multi-agency Review of the Fire Services Response to the August 1992 Fire in the Round Mountain Area of Northern California. Rural Fire Protection in America Steering Committee. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2022.
58. Jenkins, Don (March 13, 1993). "Fountain Fire concerns aired". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on November 10, 2022. Retrieved November 10, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
59. The Fountain Fire, Shasta County, August 1992. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 1993. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 7, 2022.
60. Schultz, Jim (September 14, 1997). "Ham hobbyists have fun, but also help out in emergencies". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  9, 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
61. Philp, Tom (November 29, 1994). "Hole burns in public's wallet". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  1, 16, 17. Archived from the original on November 14, 2022. Retrieved November 14, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
62. Brown, Candace L. (August 20, 1995). "Statute of limitations expires on Fountain Fire". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 8. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
63. "$10,000 reward awaits tipster for conviction in Fountain Fire". Redding Record Searchlight . September 15, 1992. p. 16. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
64. Philp, Tom (October 9, 1994). "Fountain Fire called money-motivated crime". Redding Record Searchlight . McClatchy News Service. pp.  1, 14. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
65. "Fountain Fire Vista Point". Historical Marker Database . November 22, 2008. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 25, 2022.
66. Jenkins, Don (November 3, 1992). "2nd logger killed in fire zone work". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
67. Jenkins, Don (July 16, 1993). "Third area logger killed in Fountain Fire cleanup". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
68. Jenkins, Don (August 30, 1992). "Bush OKs funds for victims of Shasta fire". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 14. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 9, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
69. Cassidy, Mike (August 26, 1992). "Arson likely in massive Shasta fire". The Modesto Bee . Knight-Ridder Newspapers. pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
70. Jenkins, Don; Lemos, Judi (August 28, 1992). "Containment line rings fire". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on November 9, 2022. Retrieved November 9, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
71. Jenkins, Don (September 9, 1992). "Links to valley hastily restored". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 25. Archived from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
72. "Fire danger closes Burney Falls park". Redding Record Searchlight . August 25, 1992. p. 27. Archived from the original on November 3, 2022. Retrieved November 3, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
73. McKinley, Clark (August 26, 1992). "Arson possible in major California wildfire". United Press International . Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
74. "Fountain Fire looting results in convictions". Redding Record Searchlight . November 25, 1992. p. 7. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 28, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
75. Brazil, Eric (August 24, 1992). "Round Mountain to spring up from the ashes". The San Francisco Examiner . p. 5. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
76. "Top 20 Most Destructive California Wildfires" (PDF). California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire). March 27, 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 27, 2024. Retrieved April 27, 2024.
77. Calvan, Bobby (August 30, 1992). "Community spirit shining through in fire aftermath". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 14. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 9, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
78. Scarborough, Stasia (August 27, 1992). "Utilities work to restore service to fire-damaged areas". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 23. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 28, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
79. Wood, Daniel B. (August 31, 1992). "Drought Triggers California Fires". Christian Science Monitor . Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
80. Lapin, Lisa (September 4, 1992). "Wildfires, memories smoldering". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  1, 24. Archived from the original on November 9, 2022. Retrieved November 9, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
81. Anderson, Lorena (September 10, 1992). "It could happen here: Fire on the ridge would be deadly". Paradise Post . pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
82. St. John, Paige; Serna, Joseph; Lin II, Rong-Gong (December 30, 2018). "Must Reads: Here's how Paradise ignored warnings and became a deathtrap". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2022.
83. "Shasta smoke hangs over area". The Press Democrat . August 23, 1992. p. 1. Archived from the original on October 31, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
84. Kimura, Donna (August 24, 1992). "Smoke alarms local residents". Santa Cruz Sentinel . pp.  1, 12. Archived from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
85. Lucas, Charlotte-Anne (August 24, 1992). "Spotted owl gets little sympathy". The San Francisco Examiner . p. 5. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
86. Holquist, Robert C. (September 29, 1992). "Botanists discover unknown plant". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 29. Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
87. Camposeco, Maria E. (August 15, 1993). "Nature struggles to regain its foothold on scorched landscape". The Sacramento Bee . p. 16. Archived from the original on November 1, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
88. Bonnicksen, Thomas M. (March 12, 2008). Greenhouse gas emissions from four California wildfires: Opportunities to prevent and reverse environmental and climate impacts (PDF) (Report). Forest Carbon and Emissions Model. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 15, 2022. Retrieved July 29, 2024– via Oregon Websites & Watersheds Project, Inc.
89. Knudson, Tom (March 12, 2008). "'Green' storage in forests may be going up in smoke". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  3, 4. Archived from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
90. Brazil, Eric; Lucas, Charlotte-Anne (August 22, 1992). "'Everything's gone': Blaze rages in Shasta County". The San Francisco Examiner . Contributions by Associated Press. pp.  1, 14. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 7, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
91. "Bush OKs relief for state fire victims". The Sacramento Bee . Associated Press. August 30, 1992. p. 26. Archived from the original on October 31, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
92. "California Old Gulch, Fountain Fires (DR-958-CA)". Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved November 1, 2022.
93. "Fees dropped for victims of Fountain Fire". Redding Record Searchlight . September 15, 1992. p. 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
94. Scarborough, Stasia (September 1, 1992). "Candidate Feinstein visits Redding". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
95. Hanson, Chad T.; Odion, Dennis C. (September 10, 2013). "Is fire severity increasing in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA?". International Journal of Wildland Fire. 23 (1). CSIRO Publishing: 1–8. doi: 10.1071/WF13016 . ISSN   1448-5516. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved November 8, 2022.
96. Holquist, Robert C. (October 6, 1992). "Helicopters help reseed ground scorched by fire". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 25. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
97. Winship, George; Scarborough, Stasia (October 30, 1992). "Rain pounds a parched north state". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 8. Archived from the original on November 19, 2022. Retrieved November 19, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
98. Winship, George (May 6, 1993). "Runoff caused erosion damage in Fountain Fire area". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 18. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 19, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
99. Holquist, Robert C.; Calvan, Bobby (August 27, 1992). "Roseburg keeps 2 mills open". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 10. Archived from the original on November 18, 2022. Retrieved November 18, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
100. Sorvino, Chloe (May 14, 2018). "A Billion-Dollar Fortune From Timber and Fire". Forbes . Archived from the original on November 18, 2022. Retrieved November 18, 2022.
101. Holquist, Robert C. (August 20, 1993). "Loggers hustle to salvage dead timber". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 8. Archived from the original on November 10, 2022. Retrieved November 10, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
102. Holquist, Robert C.; Winship, George (February 2, 1993). "Indians' protest halts salvage logging". Redding Record Searchlight . p. 1. Archived from the original on November 11, 2022. Retrieved November 11, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
103. Vogel, Nancy (September 27, 1992). "Peace turns to ashes". The Sacramento Bee . pp.  29, 34. Archived from the original on November 13, 2022. Retrieved November 13, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
104. DiTomaso, J.; Healy, E.; Marcum, D.; Kyser, G.; Rasmussen, M. (January 1, 1997). "Post-fire herbicide sprays enhance native plant diversity". California Agriculture . 51 (1): 6–11. doi: 10.3733/ca.v051n01p6 . ISSN   0008-0845. Archived from the original on October 13, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
105. Holquist, Robert C. (June 7, 1993). "Worry in the woods: Roseburg's spray plans spur concern". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 5. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 21, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
106. Franks, Jonathan (May 18, 1993). "Shasta residents seek to douse timber firm's spraying plan". The Sacramento Bee . p. B1. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 14, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
107. Vovakes, Christine (August 21, 2002). "Fountain fire's effect still felt 10 years later". The Sacramento Bee . p. B3. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 14, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
108. Jennings, Ralph (August 17, 1997). "Fountain Fire brought grief; recovery slow". Redding Record Searchlight . pp.  1, 4. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 21, 2022– via Newspapers.com.
109. Benda, David (June 23, 2021). "Shasta County panel considers big Fountain Wind farm project at Tuesday hearing". Redding Record Searchlight . Archived from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022.
110. Arthur, Damon (June 17, 2021). "Here's what happens when you submit a 135-page letter on the Fountain Wind project". Redding Record Searchlight . Archived from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022.
111. Benda, David (October 27, 2021). "Controversial wind farm rejected after Shasta supervisors back commission, cite fire risks". Redding Record Searchlight . Archived from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022.