Indian Knoll

Last updated

Indian Knoll
USA Kentucky location map.svg
Red pog.svg
Usa edcp location map.svg
Red pog.svg
Nearest city Paradise, Muhlenberg County, Kentucky
Area290 acres (120 ha)
NRHP reference No. 66000362 [1]
Added to NRHPOctober 15, 1966

Indian Knoll is an archaeological site near the Green River in Ohio County, Kentucky that was declared to be a U.S. National Historic Landmark. [1]

Contents

Excavations of Indian Knoll during the Great Depression, [2] : 115  were conducted by archaeologists from the University of Kentucky as part of WPA economic recovery efforts. [3] Research of the remains and artifacts in the 1960s-1970s demonstrated that its builders were greatly atypical of inhabitants of Archaic sites. [4] : 672  Archaic peoples were typically egalitarian, [4] : 658  but burials at this knoll revealed that the inhabitants were divided into two social groups, irrespective of age or sex, and social class seems the most likely reason for this division. [4] : 672 

Background

The Indian Knoll site, designated 15OH2, is located in the Ohio Valley of west central Kentucky near Green River. This area is known as the "shell mound region" because of the large shell middens, or deposits of shell that were disposed of by the indigenous people that lived there. [2] : 115  Though there is evidence of earlier settlement, this area was most heavily occupied from approximately 3000–2000 BC, [5] : 396  when the climate and vegetation were nearing modern conditions. This floodplain provided a stable environment, which eventually led to agricultural development early in the late Holocene era. [5] : 412  In the early 20th century Clarence Bloomfield Moore was the first to explore a small portion of the land not being used for agricultural purposes. After the farm that occupied the site was destroyed by a flood, the land was opened for further excavation by William Snyder Webb in 1939. [2] : 115  The study of this site has contributed towards an understanding of the social complexity of the southeastern cultures of the mid-late Holocene era.

Excavations

The original excavation in 1915 was led by C.B. Moore and his crew of eight men. He was the first to report on the bannerstone at Indian Knoll and recover 298 individuals, 66 of which were well preserved and sent to the United States National Museum. [2] : 127  After the flood in 1937, Webb and his team began a second excavation, leading to the discovery of 880 more burials. [2] : 115  The Indian Knoll skeletal population was inadequately evaluated by Moore, so in 1960, the remains were reassessed by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow. From the skeletal fragments, they estimated there to be at least 1,234 individuals, rather than 1,178 reported between Moore and Webb. [6] : 237  Johnston and Snow concluded that Indian Knoll had a high infant mortality rate, mostly only under one year, but also many under four. [6] : 240  The average life span was about 18.5 years old, with slightly more male burials than female. [6] : 241 

Initial excavation

The 1939 excavations included trenches paralleling the Green River, [2] : 125  which contained over 1000 burials, and evidence of ancient dwellings with burned clay flooring [7] , six hearths, [2] : 129  and what Webb noted as kitchen fireside tools, or artifacts such as hammerstones, grooved axes, pitted stones, mortars and pestles. [2] : 129–130  There were also some 67,000 artifacts uncovered at Indian Knoll, some of which were carbon dated, and thought to be an average of about 5,300 years old. [2] : 127  These dwellings are considered to be permanent occupations. [2] : 130  The hearths were probably used for heating during the winter as well as cooking. The shell middens nearby contain not only the remains of the gastropod shells, but debris of animal bone and fire-cracked rock such as sandstone and river pebbles, probably used for cooking, boiling water, and processing walnuts, hickory nuts, and acorns. [2] : 129 

Burials and grave goods

The earlier graves at Indian Knoll were found down to five feet into the sand, with the more recent burials inside the shell midden. The deepest were better preserved as a result of the moist sand, even some of the bony tissues and infant skeletons remained intact. [2] : 132  The grave structure was usually small, round, and filled in with black midden debris. The burials inside the midden showed no sign of formal walls, thus it is likely that individuals were placed in shallow depressions and filled in with the surrounding shell midden. [2] : 134  Many of the skeletons placed in shallow graves, especially the skulls, were crushed and shown signs of disturbance. [2] : 132  Most of the skeletons were found in tight coiled positions, which indicates the bodies may have been wrapped, [2] : 135  though there are a few instances of being placed sitting up, with even less fully extended . [2] : 145–147  The large number of burials caused graves to intrude into others accidentally, [2] : 137–138  though multiple burials were common practice [2] : 140  during the time the shell midden formed between the years 5500 and 2000 BC. [1] Multiple burials were also typically circular, but larger and lacked grave goods except for single projectile points near the chest cavities, which suggest violence near time of death. [2] : 140  Many skeletons were found dismembered, either unintentionally or as an act of mutilation. If a grave happened to be dug intruding another, the original body may have become dismembered, but normally the bones would have been piled up and reburied. [2] : 152  Occasionally pieces, such as skulls or limbs, were not recovered, which Robert Mensforth considered evidence for warfare and trophy taking. [8] : 114  Grave goods were found within 187 burials, [2] : 201  though shell beads, used for personal adornments or sewed on garments, were not counted as a deliberate grave goods in one study.[23] The artifacts commonly associated with graves include pestles, hammerstones, grooved axes, projectile points with a few cases of copper and stone vessels. There were 43 atlatl weights, also known as bannerstones for spear-thowers, associated with burials at Indian Knoll, and Webb's research focus when excavating this site to get more information on this particular grave good. [2] : 159 

Dog burials

During the excavations, 21 dog burials were found. [9] : 341 The graves of dogs were given the same attention as human graves, with nine examples of dogs buried with humans at Indian Knoll. [2] : 155  The dogs within human burials were associated with women and children, as much as with men. These dogs were apparently killed at the time of their owner's death and placed on top, below their feet, or at their side. [2] : 156  According to Cheryl Claassen, at least six out of the ten dogs with humans show possible evidence of a violent death. The position of the human skeleton in these cases was usually face down and devoid of artifacts. The only double dog and face down human burial occurs with a female child about the age of five, suggesting that the child’s death may have been related to ritual. [10] : 5  Claassen also suggest that these dogs were not only beloved pets, but had symbolic and ritual significance. [10] : 7  A similar belief about the healing nature of dogs is seen across Native American myths. [10] : 8  Some interpretations held by the Cherokee are that dogs are spiritual guides and judges, that symbolized morality and were considered sacred. [10] : 9  Another possible meaning considered by Claassen is that dogs were used to represent warriors whose bodies were never retrieved from war. This has been speculated because there were male dogs in single burials. [10] : 8 

Social complexity

There are several indicators of long-distance contact with other Late Archaic groups present at the Indian Knoll site including exotic materials and signs of warfare. The social organization of Archaic cultures has been broadly stereotyped as being small band or tribal communities of hunter-gatherers, with few possessions and lacking permanent villages, food production, and pottery. These cultures typically determined social statuses by age, sex, and personal achievement, because there were little differences in wealth or possessions. [4] : 658  Analysis of these artifacts and remains provide a better understanding of social organization during the late Archaic. [4] : 666  Grave goods or tools were mainly associated men, but in this community women and children were with one or many artifacts. This suggests status was not restricted by age or sex, according to N. A. Rothschild. [4] : 671  Some labor division is apparent, given the different types of artifacts commonly found among the two sexes. For example, men were buried with axes, stone and woodworking tools, fish hooks, and awls in contrast to the shells, bone beads and nut cracking stones usually found with females. [5] : 413  The most abundant material found in graves were several types of shell, manufactured into a variety of forms, such as beads and buttons worn as personal adornments. Some of these species were not local, which could indicate wealth and status, and also shows evidence of long distant exchange networks with other Archaic cultures. The Busycon, Marginella, and Olivella shell species were imported from the Gulf of Mexico or Atlantic coast, and were found at this site but rarely in burials which suggest they were probably considered valuable. A couple pieces of copper, another foreign material found at Indian Knoll, shows trade extending as far north as Lake Superior. [11] : 257 

Archaic trade networks took the form of what Claassen calls "down-the-line-transfer," [11] : 257  or resources and gifts were passed from village to village, rather than at large trade fairs. [5] : 415  This informal exchange network seems more likely because it involved fewer individuals and had less influence over cultural traditions. [11] : 257  By 2000 BC, regional variation in style of tools was visible, such as the variations in design and function of atlatl weights, or bannerstones used primarily to center the weight of a throwing stick. By this time, communities had well established control over territory and resources, causing an increase in tension and warfare. Relationships between neighbors are assumed to have had greater importance with the increases in exchange systems, and hunting or war parties. [5] : 414  By 1000 BC status differentiation is noticeable in the grave goods. [5] : 416  The degree of violence in the region is notable and many individuals showed signs of fatal injuries such as one scalping, [8] : 118  a slit throat, [8] : 120  and a skull smashed in. [8] : 122  Also many had multiple puncture marks and fractured or missing bones, serving as evidence of warfare and trophy taking. [8] : 110  Many of the dismembered bodies were missing skulls and limbs and were never recovered, indicating trophy taking. However, one trophy in the form of a human mandible was recovered from Indian Knoll. But, controversially, archaeologist Cheryl Claassen theorizes that the deaths were not due to inter-group violence, but rather because of a potential form of ritualization [12] . In all, it is estimated that the 12 incomplete skeletons may have presented as many as 34 human bone trophies to the opposing members. [8] : 119  Most of the injuries reported are caused from blunt force trauma, but were usually not fatal, suggesting well-defined rules to reduce death tolls for these organized war parties, rather than sporadic feuds. [8] : 124–125 

Pottery

Technological developments such as crude ceramics were developed by Archaic societies early during the late Holocene. [5] : 422  A total of 792 shards of pottery were found at Indian Knoll. All of which were shell or grit tempered, [2] : 356  mainly found within the first foot and a half of the mound, and closely relate to the later Mississippian culture's pottery. [2] : 360  Most vessels had wide mouths and curved or flat bases, which were handmade by building up coils of clay. [5] : 421  Pottery contributed to the exploitation and manipulation of wild plants, and more efficiency in food processing and water storage. [5] : 422  The most common type of ceramics were shell tempered, representing 78.5% of the total pottery shards found at Indian Knoll, with only 171 grit tempered shards of bowls or jars discovered. [2] : 356  Heavy grit tempered pottery appeared in different regions of the Eastern Woodlands, including Ohio Valley, between 2000 and 500 BC. [5] : 421  The grit tempered ceramics that were found show plain and cord marked ware, as well as simple stamped grooved patterns. [2] : 356–361  Several different finishes on shell tempered ceramics were also noted. Nine shards found in one were also cord marked, or tapped with a twisted fibers wrapped paddle, and three shards show signs of roughening, which were individually created by a rectangular object. [2] : 360  Other shards show signs of net impressions caused by mesh fabrics, which is common in much of western Kentucky. [2] : 359 

Agriculture

The inhabitants of the Ohio Valley were complex hunter-gatherer societies who relied on food rich resources of the deciduous forest and floodplain, including both marine and terrestrial animals and plants. A constant crop of hickory nuts, acorns, roots, and seeds were utilized by the foragers of the area, as well as later domestication of squash in the Green River Region reveals an evident trend toward subsistence agriculture, though this has not been confirmed at Indian Knoll. [5] : 412  This site was never fully excavated because of what Webb called, "difficulties arising from a shortage in the Works Progress Administration labor quota of the county," but little area was left unexplored. [2] : 125  In 1966 Indian Knoll was designated a National Historic Landmark, and today the site lies within 290 acres of private agricultural fields. [1]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaic period (North America)</span> Period from c. 8000 to 1000 BC in North America

In the classification of the archaeological cultures of North America, the Archaic period in North America, taken to last from around 8000 to 1000 BC in the sequence of North American pre-Columbian cultural stages, is a period defined by the archaic stage of cultural development. The Archaic stage is characterized by subsistence economies supported through the exploitation of nuts, seeds, and shellfish. As its ending is defined by the adoption of sedentary farming, this date can vary significantly across the Americas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wickliffe Mounds</span> Archaeological site in Kentucky, US

Wickliffe Mounds is a prehistoric, Mississippian culture archaeological site located in Ballard County, Kentucky, just outside the town of Wickliffe, about 3 miles (4.8 km) from the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Archaeological investigations have linked the site with others along the Ohio River in Illinois and Kentucky as part of the Angel phase of Mississippian culture. Wickliffe Mounds is controlled by the State Parks Service, which operates a museum at the site for interpretation of the ancient community. Listed on the National Register of Historic Places, it is also a Kentucky Archeological Landmark and State Historic Site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adena culture</span> Pre-Columbian Native American culture

The Adena culture was a Pre-Columbian Native American culture that existed from 500 BCE to 100 CE, in a time known as the Early Woodland period. The Adena culture refers to what were probably a number of related Native American societies sharing a burial complex and ceremonial system. The Adena culture was centered on the location of the modern state of Ohio, but also extended into contiguous areas of northern Kentucky, eastern Indiana, West Virginia, and parts of extreme western Pennsylvania.

The Angel phase describes a 300–400-year cultural manifestation of the Mississippian culture of the central portions of the United States of America, as defined in the discipline of archaeology. Angel phase archaeological sites date from c. 1050 - 1350 CE and are located on the northern and southern sides of the Ohio River in southern Indiana, such as National Historic Landmark Angel Mounds near present-day Evansville; northwestern Kentucky, with Wickliffe Mounds and the Tolu Site; and Kincaid Mounds State Historic Site in Illinois. Additional sites range from the mouth of Anderson River in Perry County, Indiana, west to the mouth of the Wabash in Posey County, Indiana.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bannerstone</span> Stone weight of debated purpose associated with atlatls

Bannerstones are artifacts usually found in the Eastern United States that are characterized by a centered hole in a symmetrically shaped carved or ground stone. The holes are typically 1⁄4" to 3⁄4" in diameter and extend through a raised portion centered in the stone. They usually are bored all the way through but some have been found with holes that extend only part of the way through. Many are made from banded slate or other colored hard stone. They often have a geometric "wing nut" or "butterfly" shape but are not limited to these. More than just functional artifacts, bannerstones are a form of art that appear in varying shapes, designs, and colors, symbolizing their ceremonial and spiritual importance.

The Green River Shell Middens Archeological District is a historic district composed of archaeological sites in the U.S. state of Kentucky. All of the district's sites are shell middens along the banks of the Green River that date from the later portion of the Archaic period. Studies of this assemblage of sites were critical in the development of knowledge of the Archaic period in the eastern United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leary Site</span> Archaeological site in Nebraska, US

Leary Site, also known as 25-RH-1 or Leary-Kelly Site is an archaeological site near Rulo, Nebraska and the Big Nemaha River. The site now lies entirely on the reservation of the Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska. The area was once a village and burial site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Register of Historic Places listings in Ohio County, Kentucky</span>

This is a list of the National Register of Historic Places listings in Ohio County, Kentucky.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marshall Site</span> Archaeological site in Kentucky, US

The Marshall Site (15CE27) is an Early Mississippian culture archaeological site located near Bardwell in Carlisle County, Kentucky, on a bluff spur overlooking the Mississippi River floodplain. The site was occupied from about 900 to about 1300 CE during the James Bayou Phase of the local chronology and was abandoned sometime during the succeeding Dorena Phase. Its inhabitants may have moved to the Turk Site, which is located on the nearest adjacent bluff spur to the south, and which was founded about this time. It is several miles south of the Wickliffe Mounds Site.

Stone box graves were a method of burial used by Native Americans of the Mississippian culture in the Midwestern United States and the Southeastern United States. Their construction was especially common in the Cumberland River Basin, in settlements found around present-day Nashville, Tennessee.

The Sixtoe Mound site (9MU100) is an archaeological site in Murray County, Georgia excavated by Arthur Randolph Kelly from 1962-1965 as a part of the Carters Dam project conducted for the National Park Service by the University of Georgia. The site consisted of a low platform mound and an associated village. The majority of the mound was excavated, while the village received little excavation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prather Site</span>

The Prather Site (12CL4) is a Middle Mississippian culture archaeological site located in the Falls of the Ohio region in Clark County, Indiana. It was the principal ceremonial center of the Prather Complex, the northeasternmost regional variant of the Mississippian cultures. It also bordered on several Upper Mississippian cultures, including the Fort Ancient peoples of Southern Indiana, Southern Ohio and Northeastern Kentucky.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freel Farm Mound Site</span>

The Freel Farm Mound Site (40AN22) is an archaeological site and burial mound of the Late Woodland period located on the Oak Ridge Reservation in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The site was excavated in 1934 as part of the Norris Basin Survey by the Tennessee Valley Authority using labor from the Civil Works Administration under the supervision of T.M.N. Lewis. Important finds of the excavation include 17 burials and a few artifacts. The artifacts and records from the fieldwork are held by the McClung Museum in Knoxville, Tennessee.

The Freel Farm Mound Site (40AN22) is an archaeological site and burial mound of the Woodland cultural period located on the Oak Ridge Reservation in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The site was excavated in 1934 as part of the Norris Basin Survey by the Tennessee Valley Authority using labor from the Civil Works Administration under the supervision of T.M.N. Lewis. Important finds of the excavation include 17 burials and a few artifacts. The artifacts and records from the fieldwork are held by the McClung Museum in Knoxville, Tennessee.

The Carlston Annis Shell Mound is a prominent archaeological site in the western part of the U.S. state of Kentucky. Located along the Green River in Butler County, this shell midden has been declared a historic site because of its archaeological value.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hidden Valley Rockshelter</span> Archaeological site in Virginia, United States

The Hidden Valley Rockshelter (44-BA-31) is a significant archaeological site located near the community of Warm Springs in Bath County, Virginia, United States. A large rockshelter located near the Jackson River, it has been occupied by humans for thousands of years, and it has been named a historic site.

Dewil Valley, located in the northernmost part of Palawan, an island province of the Philippines that is located in the Mimaropa region, is an archaeological site composed of thousands of artifacts and features. According to the University of the Philippines Archaeological Studies Program, or UP-ASP, the closest settlement can be found in New Ibajay, which is covered by the town capital of El Nido, which is located around 9 km (5.6 mi) south-east of Dewil Valley. Physically it measures around 7 km (4.3 mi) long, and 4 km (2.5 mi) wide. It is in this place which the Ille Cave, one of the main archaeological sites, can be found. It is actually a network of 3 cave mouths located at its base. It has been discovered that this site in particular has been used and occupied by humans over multiple time periods.

There are many sites within the Midwestern United States. Some of the better known sites are the Koster Site in Illinois, the Green River Valley in Kentucky, Hendricks Cave in Ohio, Indian Knolls and Dravo Gravel.

The Fisher Mound Group is a group of burial mounds with an associated village site located on the DesPlaines River near its convergence with the Kankakee River where they combine to form the Illinois River, in Will County, Illinois, about 60 miles southwest of Chicago. It is a multi-component stratified site representing several Prehistoric Upper Mississippian occupations as well as minor Late Woodland and Early Historic components.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kadero (archaeological site)</span> Archaeological site in Central Sudan

Kadero is an African archaeological site located in Central Sudan, northeast of Khartoum, Sudan and east of the Nile River. The site consists of burial grounds and two sand mounds around 1.5 meters in elevation, altogether encompassing around three hectares. Excavations at the site were led by Lech Krzyżaniak at the University of Warsaw. Kadero was occupied during the Neolithic period, dating to the years 5960 through 5030 B.P specifically, by pastoralists. The inhabitants of Kadero left behind evidence of intensive pastoralism, which is the earliest evidence of such phenomena in the area. Analysis of ceramics and stone artifacts have led archaeologists to consider the site as comparable to other early Neolithic sites in central Sudan, such as Ghaba and R12, placing the site in the early Khartoum culture.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places . National Park Service. July 9, 2010.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Webb, William (1974). Indian Knoll . The University of Tennessee Press Knoxville. pp.  116–340.
  3. ↑ "Indian Knoll - Discover Kentucky Archaeology". archaeology.ky.gov. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rothschild, Nan A. "Mortuary Behavior and Social Organization at Indian Knoll and Dickson Mounds". American Antiquity 44.4 (1979): 658–675.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Fagan, Brian (2005). Ancient North America. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd. pp. 410–417.
  6. 1 2 3 Johnston, Francis; Snow, Charles (September 1961). "The Reassessment of the Age and Sex of the Indian Knoll Skeletal Populations: Demographical and Methodological Aspects". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 19 (3): 237–244. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330190304.
  7. ↑ "Indian Knoll - Discover Kentucky Archaeology". archaeology.ky.gov. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mensforth, Robert (2001). Warfare and Trophy Taking in the Archaic Period. Kent State University Press: Archaic Transitions in Ohio and Kentucky Prehistory. pp. 110–134.
  9. ↑ Webb, William Snyder (1974). Indian Knoll. Internet Archive. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. p. 341. ISBN   978-0-87049-150-4.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Claassen, Cheryl. "Archaic Rituals: Rebalancing with Dogs". Academia. Retrieved November 16, 2012.
  11. 1 2 3 Claassen, Cheryl (1996). A Consideration of the Social Organization of the Shell Mound Archaic. University Press of Florida: Archaeology of the mid-Holocene southeast. pp. 235–258.
  12. ↑ Pauketat and Sassaman 2022 p 244

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.