Phonological changes from Classical Latin to Proto-Romance

Last updated

As Classical Latin developed into Proto-Romance it experienced various sound changes. An approximate summary of changes on the phonemic level is provided below. Their precise order is uncertain.

Contents

General changes

Sporadic changes

See also

Notes

  1. Note that the result is an open-mid /ɛː/, distinct from the close-mid /eː/ resulting from the earlier 'rural' monophthongization.
  2. Etymologically dis- + placet, with the unstressed /a/ modified to /i/ in Archaic Latin. In the unprefixed form placet, the /a/ remained unchanged, since it was stressed.

Related Research Articles

Latin phonology is the system of sounds used in various kinds of Latin. This article largely deals with what features can be deduced for Classical Latin as it was spoken by the educated from the late Roman Republic to the early Empire. Evidence comes in the form of comments from Roman grammarians, common spelling mistakes, transcriptions into other languages, and the outcomes of various sounds in Romance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romance languages</span> Direct descendants of Vulgar Latin

The Romance languages, also known as the Latin or Neo-Latin languages, are the languages that are directly descended from Vulgar Latin. They are the only extant subgroup of the Italic branch of the Indo-European language family.

Italian orthography uses 21 letters of the 26-letter Latin alphabet to write the Italian language. This article focuses on the writing of Standard Italian, based historically on the Florentine dialect, and not the other Italian dialects.

The phonology of Catalan, a Romance language, has a certain degree of dialectal variation. Although there are two standard varieties, one based on Central Eastern dialect and another one based on South-Western or Valencian dialect, this article deals with features of all or most dialects, as well as regional pronunciation differences.

The phonology of Italian describes the sound system—the phonology and phonetics—of Standard Italian and its geographical variants.

In phonetics, vowel reduction is any of various changes in the acoustic quality of vowels as a result of changes in stress, sonority, duration, loudness, articulation, or position in the word, and which are perceived as "weakening". It most often makes the vowels shorter as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Italian</span> Romance varieties spoken in Central Italy

Central Italian refers to the dialects of Italo-Romance spoken in the so-called Area Mediana, which covers a swathe of the central Italian peninsula. Area Mediana is also used in a narrower sense to describe the southern part, in which case the northern one may be referred to as the Area Perimediana, a distinction that will be made throughout this article. The two areas are split along a line running approximately from Rome in the southwest to Ancona in the northeast.

French is a Romance language that specifically is classified under the Gallo-Romance languages.

The Portuguese language began to be used regularly in documents and poetry around the 12th century. Unlike neighboring Romance languages that adopted formal orthographies by the 18th century, the Portuguese language did not have a uniform spelling standard until the 20th century. The formation of the Portuguese Republic in 1911 was motivation for the establishment of orthographic reform in Portugal and its overseas territories and colonies. Brazil would adopt an orthographic standard based on, but not identical to, the Portuguese standard a few decades later.

Taos is a Tanoan language spoken by several hundred people in New Mexico, in the United States. The main description of its phonology was contributed by George L. Trager in a (pre-generative) structuralist framework. Earlier considerations of the phonetics-phonology were by John P. Harrington and Jaime de Angulo. Trager's first account was in Trager (1946) based on fieldwork 1935-1937, which was then substantially revised in Trager (1948). The description below takes Trager (1946) as the main point of departure and notes where this differs from the analysis of Trager (1948). Harrington's description is more similar to Trager (1946). Certain comments from a generative perspective are noted in a comparative work Hale (1967).

The traditional English pronunciation of Latin, and Classical Greek words borrowed through Latin, is the way the Latin language was traditionally pronounced by speakers of English until the early 20th century. Although this pronunciation is no longer taught in Latin classes, it is still broadly used in the fields of biology, law, and medicine.

The phonology of the Zuni language as spoken in the southwestern United States is described here. Phonology is a branch of linguistics that studies how languages or dialects systematically organize their sounds.

This article describes the phonology of the Occitan language.

The Reichenau Glossary is a collection of Latin glosses likely compiled in the 8th century in northern France to assist local clergy in understanding certain words or expressions found in the Vulgate Bible.

French exhibits perhaps the most extensive phonetic changes of any of the Romance languages. Similar changes are seen in some of the northern Italian regional languages, such as Lombard or Ligurian. Most other Romance languages are significantly more conservative phonetically, with Spanish, Italian, and especially Sardinian showing the most conservatism, and Portuguese, Occitan, Catalan, and Romanian showing moderate conservatism.

This article is about the phonology and phonetics of standard Slovene.

As a member of the dialect continuum of Romance languages, Catalan displays linguistic features similar to those of its closest neighbors. The following features represent in some cases unique changes in the evolution of Catalan from Vulgar Latin; other features are common in other Romance-speaking areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sardinian phonology</span> Phonology of the Sardinian language

Sardinian is conventionally divided, mainly on phonological criteria, into three main varieties: Campidanese, Logudorese, and Nuorese. The last of these has a notably conservative phonology, compared not only to the other two varieties, but also to other Romance languages as well.

Proto-Romance is the comparatively reconstructed ancestor of the Romance languages. It is effectively Late Latin viewed retrospectively through its descendants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lausberg area</span>

The Lausberg area is a part of southern Italy that covers much of Basilicata and the northern edge of Calabria, where Southern Italian dialects characterized by atypical Italo-Romance vowel developments are spoken. It is named after the German philologist Heinrich Lausberg, who brought the area to the attention of mainstream scholarship in 1939.

References

  1. Grandgent 1907 :§§249–250; Pope 1934 :§155.1
  2. Lausberg 1970 :§251
  3. Pope 1934 :§205
  4. Lausberg 1970 :§530; Hall 1976 :180
  5. Pope 1934 :§214.2; Lausberg 1970 :§149.1
  6. Grandgent 1907 :§134
  7. Allen 1965 :27–29
  8. Grandgent 1907 :§31; Jensen 1972 :74
  9. Grandgent 1907 :§227
  10. Allen 1965 :60–62; Lloyd 1987 :105–107. This citation covers the following bullet-point as well.
  11. Pope 1934 :§§186, 333; Gouvert 2016 :48
  12. Grandgent 1907 :§324; Pope 1934 :§163.7
  13. Pope 1934 :§188
  14. Grandgent 1907 :§224; Lausberg 1970 :§251
  15. Grandgent 1907 :§§136–137; Lausberg 1970 :§149.2
  16. Lausberg 1970 :§251
  17. Grandgent 1907 :§226; Pope 1934 :§187.b.
  18. Grandgent 1907 :§225; Lausberg 1970 :§251
  19. Lausberg 1970 :§479
  20. Lausberg 1970 :§187.2
  21. Grandgent 1907 :§268; Pope 1934 :§156.3
  22. Grandgent 1907 :§255. This citation covers the following bullet-point as well.
  23. Lloyd 1987 :148–150; Hall 1976 :128
  24. Lausberg 1970 :§356
  25. Lausberg 1970 :§204
  26. Grandgent 1907 :§139; Lausberg 1970 :§149.6. This citation covers the following two bullet-points as well.
  27. Lausberg 1970 :§189
  28. Loporcaro 2015; Leppänen & Alho 2018
  29. Ferguson 1976 :78; Gouvert 2015 :73–76
  30. Lausberg 1970 :§§192–196 apud Gouvert 2015 :78–79
  31. Lausberg 1970 :§§451–466; Gouvert 2015 :83
  32. Lloyd 1987 :113–114; Penny 2002 :59
  33. Grandgent 1907 :§229; Lausberg 1970 :§265
  34. Grandgent 1907 :§325; Lausberg 1970 :§245
  35. Grandgent 1907 :§234; Pope 1934 :§156.5
  36. Grandgent 1907 :§163; Lausberg 1970 :218
  37. Grandgent 1907 :§166
  38. Grandgent 1907 :§172
  39. Grandgent 1907 :§229; Lausberg 1970 :§§257–258
  40. Grandgent 1907 :§217; Lausberg 1970 :§238
  41. Grandgent 1907 :§229.1; Lausberg 1970 :§259
  42. Grandgent 1907 :§291; Lausberg 1970 :§410. This citation covers the following bullet-point as well.
  43. Grandgent 1907 :§257; Pope 1934 :§202
  44. Lausberg 1970 :§321
  45. Elcock 1960 :33
  46. Politzer 1953 :34–35, 50
  47. Grandgent 1907 :§292

Bibliography