Phonological changes from Classical Latin to Proto-Romance

Last updated

An approximate summary of the sound changes from Classical Latin to Proto-Romance is provided below. Their precise order is uncertain.

Contents

General changes

Sporadic changes

See also

Notes

  1. Note that the result is an open-mid /ɛː/, distinct from the close-mid /eː/ that results from the earlier 'rural' monophthongization.
  2. Etymologically dis- + placet, with the unstressed /a/ modified to /i/ in Old Latin. In the unprefixed form placet, the /a/ remained unchanged since it was stressed.

Related Research Articles

Latin phonology is the system of sounds used in various kinds of Latin. This article largely deals with what features can be deduced for Classical Latin as it was spoken by the educated from the late Roman Republic to the early Empire. Evidence comes in the form of comments from Roman grammarians, common spelling mistakes, transcriptions into other languages, and the outcomes of various sounds in the Romance languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romance languages</span> Direct descendants of Vulgar Latin

The Romance languages, also known as the Latin or Neo-Latin languages, are the languages that are directly descended from Vulgar Latin. They are the only extant subgroup of the Italic branch of the Indo-European language family.

The Catalan phonology has a certain degree of dialectal variation. Although there are two standard varieties, one based on Central Eastern dialect and another one based on South-Western or Valencian, this article deals with features of all or most dialects, as well as regional pronunciation differences.

The Portuguese language developed in the Western Iberian Peninsula from Latin spoken by Roman soldiers and colonists starting in the 3rd century BC. Old Galician, also known as Medieval Portuguese, began to diverge from other Romance languages after the fall of the Western Roman Empire and the Germanic invasions, also known as barbarian invasions, in the 5th century, and started appearing in written documents around the 9th century. By the 13th century, Old Portuguese had its own literature and began to split into two languages. However, the debate of whether Galician and Portuguese are nowadays varieties of the same language, much like American English or British English, is still present. In all aspects—phonology, morphology, lexicon and syntax—Portuguese is essentially the result of an organic evolution of Vulgar Latin with some influences from other languages, namely the native Gallaecian and Lusitanian languages spoken prior to the Roman domination.

The phonology of Italian describes the sound system—the phonology and phonetics—of standard Italian and its geographical variants.

In phonetics, vowel reduction is any of various changes in the acoustic quality of vowels as a result of changes in stress, sonority, duration, loudness, articulation, or position in the word, and which are perceived as "weakening". It most often makes the vowels shorter as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Italian</span> Romance varieties spoken in Central Italy

Central Italian refers to a family of indigenous varieties of Italo-Romance spoken in much of Central Italy.

French is a Romance language that specifically is classified under the Gallo-Romance languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Portuguese orthography</span> Alphabet and spelling

Portuguese orthography is based on the Latin alphabet and makes use of the acute accent, the circumflex accent, the grave accent, the tilde, and the cedilla to denote stress, vowel height, nasalization, and other sound changes. The diaeresis was abolished by the last Orthography Agreement. Accented letters and digraphs are not counted as separate characters for collation purposes.

The traditional English pronunciation of Latin, and Classical Greek words borrowed through Latin, is the way the Latin language was traditionally pronounced by speakers of English until the early 20th century. Although this pronunciation is no longer taught in Latin classes, it is still broadly used in the fields of biology, law, and medicine.

This article describes the phonology of the Occitan language.

Luchazi is a Bantu language of Angola and Zambia. Luchazi is the principal language of the Ngangela Group. Ngangela is a term coined by the Vimbundu traders and missionaries in 18th century to describe the tribes occupying the area of eastern-central Angola.

Proto-Sámi is the hypothetical, reconstructed common ancestor of the Sámi languages. It is a descendant of the Proto-Uralic language.

French exhibits perhaps the most extensive phonetic changes of any of the Romance languages. Similar changes are seen in some of the northern Italian regional languages, such as Lombard or Ligurian. Most other Romance languages are significantly more conservative phonetically, with Spanish, Italian, and especially Sardinian showing the most conservatism, and Portuguese, Romanian, Catalan, and Occitan showing moderate conservatism.

This article is about the phonology and phonetics of standard Slovene.

As a member of the dialect continuum of Romance languages, Catalan displays linguistic features similar to those of its closest neighbors. The following features represent in some cases unique changes in the evolution of Catalan from Vulgar Latin; other features are common in other Romance-speaking areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sardinian phonology</span> Phonology of the Sardinian language

Sardinian is conventionally divided, mainly on phonological criteria, into three main varieties: Campidanese, Logudorese, and Nuorese. The last of these has a notably conservative phonology, compared not only to the other two varieties, but also to other Romance languages as well.

The Cornish language separated from the southwestern dialect of Common Brittonic at some point between 600 and 1000 AD. The phonological similarity of the Cornish, Welsh, and Breton languages during this period is reflected in their writing systems, and in some cases it is not possible to distinguish these languages orthographically. However, by the time it had ceased to be spoken as a community language around 1800 the Cornish language had undergone significant phonological changes, resulting in a number of unique features which distinguish it from the other neo-Brittonic languages.

Proto-Romance is the result of applying the comparative method to reconstruct the latest common ancestor of the Romance languages. To what extent, if any, such a reconstruction reflects a real état de langue is controversial. The closest real-life counterpart would have been (vernacular) Late Latin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lausberg area</span>

The Lausberg area is a part of southern Italy, covering much of Basilicata and the northern edge of Calabria, where Southern Italian dialects are spoken that show vowel developments atypical of Italo-Romance. The area is named after Heinrich Lausberg, who brought it to the attention of scholarship in 1939.

References

  1. Grandgent 1907 :§§249–250; Pope 1934 :§155.1
  2. Lausberg 1970 :§251
  3. Pope 1934 :§205
  4. ()Lausberg 1970 :§530; Hall 1976 :180
  5. Pope 1934 :§214.2; Lausberg 1970 :§149.1
  6. Grandgent 1907 :§134
  7. Allen 1965 :27–29
  8. Grandgent 1907 :§31; Jensen 1972 :74
  9. Grandgent 1907 :§227
  10. Allen 1965 :60–62; Lloyd 1987 :105–107. This citation covers the following bullet-point as well.
  11. Pope 1934 :§§186, 333; Gouvert 2016 :48
  12. Grandgent 1907 :§324; Pope 1934 :§163.7
  13. Pope 1934 :§188
  14. Grandgent 1907 :§224; Lausberg 1970 :§251
  15. Grandgent 1907 :§§136–137; Lausberg 1970 :§149.2
  16. Lausberg 1970 :§251
  17. Grandgent 1907 :§226; Pope 1934 :§187.b.
  18. Grandgent 1907 :§225; Lausberg 1970 :§251
  19. Lausberg 1970 :§479
  20. Lausberg 1970 :§187.2
  21. Grandgent 1907 :§268; Pope 1934 :§156.3
  22. Grandgent 1907 :§255. This citation covers the following bullet point as well.
  23. Lloyd 1987 :148–150; Hall 1976 :128
  24. Sampson 2010 :56
  25. Sampson 2010 :60, 61
  26. Sampson 2010 :78
  27. Lausberg 1970 :§356
  28. Lausberg 1970 :§204
  29. Grandgent 1907 :§139; Lausberg 1970 :§149.6. This citation covers the following two bullet points as well.
  30. Lausberg 1970 :§189
  31. Loporcaro 2015; Leppänen & Alho 2018
  32. Ferguson 1976 :78; Gouvert 2015 :73–76
  33. Lausberg 1970 :§§192–196 apud Gouvert 2015 :78–79
  34. Lausberg 1970 :§§451–466; Gouvert 2015 :83
  35. Lloyd 1987 :113–114; Penny 2002 :59
  36. Grandgent 1907 :§229; Lausberg 1970 :§265
  37. Grandgent 1907 , §318, §325
  38. Lausberg 1970 :§245
  39. Grandgent 1907 , §234; Pope 1934 , §156.5
  40. Grandgent 1907 :§163; Lausberg 1970 :218
  41. Grandgent 1907 :§166
  42. Grandgent 1907 :§172
  43. Grandgent 1907 :§229; Lausberg 1970 :§§257–258
  44. Grandgent 1907 :§217; Lausberg 1970 :§238
  45. Grandgent 1907 :§229.1; Lausberg 1970 :§259
  46. Grandgent 1907 :§291; Lausberg 1970 :§410. This citation covers the following bullet-point as well.
  47. Grandgent 1907 :§257; Pope 1934 :§202
  48. Lausberg 1970 :§321
  49. Elcock 1960 :33
  50. Politzer 1953 :34–35, 50
  51. Grandgent 1907 :§292

Bibliography