Rally 'round the flag effect

Last updated
United States President George W. Bush approval rating from 2001 to 2006. Spikes in approval coincide with the September 11 attacks, the invasion of Iraq, and the capture of Saddam Hussein. George W Bush approval ratings with events.svg
United States President George W. Bush approval rating from 2001 to 2006. Spikes in approval coincide with the September 11 attacks, the invasion of Iraq, and the capture of Saddam Hussein.

The rally 'round the flag effect (or syndrome) is a concept used in political science and international relations to explain increased short-run popular support of a country's government or political leaders during periods of international crisis or war. [1] Because the effect can reduce criticism of governmental policies, it can be seen as a factor of diversionary foreign policy. [1]

Contents

Mueller's definition

Political scientist John Mueller suggested the effect in 1970, in a paper called "Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson". He defined it as coming from an event with three qualities: [2]

  1. "Is international"
  2. "Involves the United States and particularly the President directly"
  3. "Specific, dramatic, and sharply focused"

It is worth noting that quality 2, as well as other aspects, are redundant as this phenomenon is seen beyond America, such as the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel temporarily uniting a Benjamin Netanyahu led coalition government.

In addition, Mueller created five categories of rallies. Mueller's five categories are:

  1. Sudden US military intervention (e.g., Korean War, Bay of Pigs Invasion)
  2. Major diplomatic actions (e.g., Truman Doctrine)
  3. Dramatic technological developments (e.g., Sputnik)
  4. US-Soviet summit meetings (e.g., Potsdam Conference)
  5. Major military developments in ongoing wars (e.g., Tet Offensive)

These categories are considered dated by modern political scientists, as they rely heavily on Cold War events. [3]

Causes and duration

Since Mueller's original theories, two schools of thought have emerged to explain the causes of the effect. The first, "The Patriotism School of Thought" holds that in times of crisis, the American public sees the President as the embodiment of national unity. The second, "The Opinion Leadership School" believes that the rally emerges from a lack of criticism from members of the opposition party, most often in the United States Congress. If opposition party members appear to support the president, the media has no conflict to report, thus it appears to the public that all is well with the performance of the president. [4] The two theories have both been criticized, but it is generally accepted that the Patriotism School of thought is better to explain causes of rallies, while the Opinion Leadership School of thought is better to explain duration of rallies. [3] It is also believed that the lower the presidential approval rating before the crisis, the larger the increase will be in terms of percentage points because it leaves the president more room for improvement. For example, Franklin D. Roosevelt only had a 12pp increase in approval from 72% to 84% following the Attack on Pearl Harbor, whereas George W. Bush had a 39pp increase from 51% to 90% following the September 11 attacks. [5]

Another theory about the cause of the effect is believed to be embedded in the US Constitution. Unlike in other countries, the constitution makes the President both head of government and head of state. Because of this, the president receives a temporary boost in popularity because his Head of State role gives him symbolic importance to the American people. However, as time goes on his duties as Head of Government require partisan decisions that polarize opposition parties and diminish popularity. This theory falls in line more with the Opinion Leadership School.

Due to the highly statistical nature of presidential polls, University of Alabama political scientist John O'Neal has approached the study of rally 'round the flag using mathematics. O'Neal has postulated that the Opinion Leadership School is the more accurate of the two using mathematical equations. These equations are based on quantified factors such as the number of headlines from The New York Times about the crisis, the presence of bipartisan support or hostility, and prior popularity of the president. [6]

Political Scientist from The University of California Los Angeles, Matthew A. Baum found that the source of a rally 'round the flag effect is from independents and members of the opposition party shifting their support behind the President after the rallying effect. Baum also found that when the country is more divided or in a worse economic state then the rally effect is larger. This is because more people who are against the president before the rallying event switch to support him afterwards. When the country is divided before the rallying event there is a higher potential increase in support for the President after the rallying event. [7]

In a study by Political Scientist Terrence L. Chapman and Dan Reiter, rallies in Presidential approval ratings were found to be bigger when there was U.N. Security Council supported Militarized interstate disputes (MIDs). Having U.N. Security Council support was found to increase the rally effect in presidential approval by 8 to 9 points compared to when there was not U.N. Security Council support. [5]

According to a 2019 study of ten countries in the period 1990–2014, there is evidence of a rally-around-the-flag effect early on in an intervention with military casualties (in at least the first year) but voters begin to punish the governing parties after 4.5 years. [8] A 2021 study found weak effects for the rally-around-the-flag effect. [9] A 2023 study found that militarized interstate disputes, on average, decrease public support for national leaders rather than increase it. [10]

A 2022 study applies the same logic of rally effects to crisis termination instead of just onset. Using all available public presidential polling and crisis data from 1953 to 2016, the researchers found that a president received a three point increase to their approval rating, on average, when terminating an international crisis. They suggest that the surge in approvals is as much related to a proof of a president's foreign affairs competency, as it is related to a mutual camaraderie in defense of the nation. [11] Additionally, the suggestion that a president can achieve approval boosts via ending conflict instead of initiating conflict makes less cynical assumptions about the options within a president's toolkit and provide an additional avenue for inquiry into diversionary war theories.

Historical examples

United States

The effect has been examined within the context of nearly every major foreign policy crisis since World War II. Some notable examples:

Others

In a pandemic

The incumbent Conservative Party's popularity spiked in the weeks following the COVID-19 outbreak in the United Kingdom. Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election after 2019 (LOESS).svg
The incumbent Conservative Party's popularity spiked in the weeks following the COVID-19 outbreak in the United Kingdom.

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 briefly resulted in popularity spikes for several world leaders. President Donald Trump's approval rating saw a slight increase during the outbreak in early 2020. [29] In addition to Trump, other heads of government in Europe also gained in popularity. [30] French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson became "very popular" in the weeks following the pandemic hitting their respective nations. [30] Johnson, in particular, who "became seriously ill himself" from COVID-19, led his government to become "the most popular in decades." [30] [31] It was uncertain how long their increase in the approval polls would last, but former NATO secretary general George Robertson opined, "People do rally around, but it evaporates fast." [30]

Controversy and fears of misuse

There are fears that the president will misuse the rally 'round the flag effect. These fears come from the "diversionary theory of war" in which the President creates an international crisis in order to distract from domestic affairs and to increase their approval ratings through a rally 'round the flag effect. The fear associated with this theory is that a President can create international crises to avoid dealing with serious domestic issues or to increase their approval rating when it begins to drop. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1968 United States presidential election</span> 46th quadrennial U.S. presidential election

The 1968 United States presidential election was the 46th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 5, 1968. The Republican nominee, former vice president Richard Nixon, defeated both the Democratic nominee, incumbent vice president Hubert Humphrey, and the American Independent Party nominee, former Alabama governor George Wallace. This was the last election until 1988 in which the incumbent president was not on the ballot. This was also the last election where a third-party candidate received an electoral vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1980 United States presidential election</span> 49th quadrennial U.S. presidential election

The 1980 United States presidential election was the 49th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 4, 1980. The Republican ticket of Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush defeated incumbent Democratic president Jimmy Carter and incumbent vice president Walter Mondale in a landslide victory.

The bandwagon effect is the tendency for people to adopt certain behaviors, styles, or attitudes simply because others are doing so. More specifically, it is a cognitive bias by which public opinion or behaviours can alter due to particular actions and beliefs rallying amongst the public. It is a psychological phenomenon whereby the rate of uptake of beliefs, ideas, fads and trends increases with respect to the proportion of others who have already done so. As more people come to believe in something, others also "hop on the bandwagon" regardless of the underlying evidence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public opinion in the United States on the invasion of Iraq</span>

The United States public's opinion on the invasion of Iraq has changed significantly since the years preceding the incursion. For various reasons, mostly related to the unexpected consequences of the invasion, as well as misinformation provided by US authorities, the US public's perspective on its government's choice to initiate an offensive is increasingly negative. Before the invasion in March 2003, polls showed 47–60% of the US public supported an invasion, dependent on U.N. approval. According to the same poll retaken in April 2007, 58% of the participants stated that the initial attack was a mistake. In May 2007, the New York Times and CBS News released similar results of a poll in which 61% of participants believed the U.S. "should have stayed out" of Iraq.

An opinion poll, often simply referred to as a survey or a poll, is a human research survey of public opinion from a particular sample. Opinion polls are usually designed to represent the opinions of a population by conducting a series of questions and then extrapolating generalities in ratio or within confidence intervals. A person who conducts polls is referred to as a pollster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ernesto Zedillo</span> President of Mexico from 1994 to 2000

Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de León is a Mexican economist and politician. He was the 61st president of Mexico from 1994 to 2000, as the last of the uninterrupted 71-year line of Mexican presidents from the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI).

"Read my lips: no new taxes" is a phrase spoken by American presidential candidate George H. W. Bush at the 1988 Republican National Convention as he accepted the nomination on August 18. Written by speechwriter Peggy Noonan, the line was the most prominent sound bite from the speech. The pledge not to tax the American people further had been a consistent part of Bush's 1988 election platform, and its prominent inclusion in his speech cemented it in the public consciousness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Historical rankings of presidents of the United States</span> Topic of American history and political science

In political studies, surveys have been conducted in order to construct historical rankings of the success of the presidents of the United States. Ranking systems are usually based on surveys of academic historians and political scientists or popular opinion. The scholarly rankings focus on presidential achievements, leadership qualities, failures and faults. Popular-opinion polls typically focus on recent or well-known presidents.

In the United States, presidential job approval ratings were first conducted by George Gallup to gauge public support for the president of the United States during their term. An approval rating is a percentage determined by polling which indicates the percentage of respondents to an opinion poll who approve of a particular person or program. Typically, an approval rating is given to a politician based on responses to a poll in which a sample of people are asked whether they approve or disapprove of that particular political figure. A question might ask: "Do you approve or disapprove of the way that the current president is handling their job as president?"

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George W. Bush</span> President of the United States from 2001 to 2009

George Walker Bush is an American politician and businessman who served as the 43rd president of the United States from 2001 to 2009. A member of the Republican Party, he previously served as the 46th governor of Texas from 1995 to 2000.

Rasmussen Reports is an American polling company founded in 2003. The company engages in political commentary and the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. Rasmussen Reports conducts nightly tracking, at national and state levels, of elections, politics, current events, consumer confidence, business topics, and the United States president's job approval ratings. Surveys by the company are conducted using a combination of automated public opinion polling involving pre-recorded telephone inquiries and an online survey. The company generates revenue by selling advertising and subscriptions to its polling survey data.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public image of George W. Bush</span> Public image of the 21st-century US president

George W. Bush, the 43rd president of the United States, has elicited a variety of public perceptions regarding his policies, personality and performance as a head of state. In the United States and elsewhere, journalists, polling organizations and others have documented the expression of an evolving array of opinions of President Bush. Time magazine named George W. Bush as its Person of the Year for 2000 and 2004, citing him as the most influential person during these two years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1980 Democratic Party presidential primaries</span> Selection of the Democratic Party nominee

From January 21 to June 3, 1980, voters of the Democratic Party chose its nominee for president in the 1980 United States presidential election. Incumbent President Jimmy Carter was again selected as the nominee through a series of primary elections and caucuses, culminating in the 1980 Democratic National Convention, held from August 11 to August 14, 1980, in New York City.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1952 Republican Party presidential primaries</span> Selection of Republican US presidential candidate

From March 11 to June 3, 1952, delegates were elected to the 1952 Republican National Convention.

A diversionary foreign policy, or a diversionary war, is an international relations term that identifies a war instigated by a country's leader in order to distract its population from their own domestic strife. The concept stems from the Diversionary War Theory, which states that leaders who are threatened by domestic turmoil may initiate an international conflict in order to improve their standing. There are two primary mechanisms behind diversionary war: a manipulation of the rally 'round the flag effect, causing an increase of national fervor from the general public, and "gambling on resurrection", whereby a leader in a perilous domestic situation takes high-risk foreign policy decisions with small chance of success but with a high reward if successful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polling for United States presidential elections</span>

Gallup was the first polling organization to conduct accurate opinion polling for United States presidential elections. Gallup polling has often been accurate in predicting the outcome of presidential elections and the margin of victory for the winner. However, it missed some close elections: 1948, 1976 and 2004, the popular vote in 2000, and the likely-voter numbers in 2012. The month section in the tables represents the month in which the opinion poll was conducted. D represents the Democratic Party, and R represents the Republican Party. Third parties, such as the Dixiecrats and the Reform Party, were included in some polls.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Socialist Party (France)</span> French political party (1969–present)

The Socialist Party is a French centre-left and social-democratic political party. It holds pro-European views. The PS was for decades the largest party of the "French Left" and used to be one of the two major political parties in the French Fifth Republic, along with The Republicans. It replaced the earlier French Section of the Workers' International in 1969 and is currently led by First Secretary Olivier Faure. The PS is a member of the Party of European Socialists, Progressive Alliance and Socialist International.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronald Reagan 1984 presidential campaign</span>

President Ronald Reagan authorized the formation of his 1984 reelection campaign committee, Reagan-Bush '84, on October 17, 1983. He made the formal announcement of his candidacy for re-election on January 29, 1984. On August 23, 1984, he secured the nomination of the Republican Party at its convention in Dallas, Texas. The convention nominated Vice President George H. W. Bush as his running mate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign</span> 1992 presidential campaign of President George H. W. Bush

The 1992 presidential campaign of George H. W. Bush was an unsuccessful re-election campaign for 1992 United States presidential election by incumbent president George H. W. Bush, who had taken office on January 20, 1989. The primary reason that Bush lost to Clinton was the independent candidacy of Ross Perot. Bush and incumbent vice president Dan Quayle were defeated by Democratic presidential nominee Bill Clinton and vice presidential nominee Al Gore. Bush, a Republican president and former vice president under Ronald Reagan, launched his presidential bid on October 11, 1991 and secured nomination for his re-election on August 20, 1992. He was challenged in the Republican primaries by former White House Communications Director Pat Buchanan, who received less than one percent of the delegates in the Convention.

Since 1981, there has been opinion polling on the Ronald Reagan administration to gather and analyze public opinion on the performance and policies of the Ronald Reagan administration.

References

  1. 1 2 Goldstein, Joshua S.; Pevehouse, Jon C. (2008). International Relations: Eighth Edition. New York: Pearson Longman.
  2. Mueller, John (1970). "Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson". American Political Science Review. 64 (1): 18–34. doi:10.2307/1955610. JSTOR   1955610. S2CID   144178825.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Hetherington, Marc J.; Nelson, Michael (2003). "Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism". PS: Political Science and Politics. 36 (1): 37–42. doi:10.1017/S1049096503001665. JSTOR   3649343. S2CID   154505157.
  4. Baker, William D.; Oneal, John R. (2001). "Patriotism or Opinion Leadership?: The Nature and Origins of the 'Rally 'Round the Flag' Effect". The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 45 (5): 661–687. doi:10.1177/0022002701045005006. JSTOR   3176318. S2CID   154579943.
  5. 1 2 Chapman, Terrence L.; Reiter, Dan (2004). "The United Nations Security Council and the Rally 'Round the Flag Effect". The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 48 (6): 886–909. doi:10.1177/0022002704269353. JSTOR   4149799. S2CID   154622646.
  6. Lian, Bradley; O'Neal, John R. (1993). "Presidents, the Use of Military Force, and Public Opinion". Journal of Conflict Resolution. 37 (2): 277–300. doi:10.1177/0022002793037002003. JSTOR   174524. S2CID   154815976..
  7. Baum, Matthew A. (2002-06-01). "The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon". International Studies Quarterly. 46 (2): 263–298. doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.00232 . ISSN   1468-2478.
  8. Kuijpers, Dieuwertje (2019). "Rally around All the Flags: The Effect of Military Casualties on Incumbent Popularity in Ten Countries 1990–2014". Foreign Policy Analysis. 15 (3): 392–412. doi: 10.1093/fpa/orz014 .
  9. Myrick, Rachel (2021). "Do External Threats Unite or Divide? Security Crises, Rivalries, and Polarization in American Foreign Policy". International Organization. 75 (4): 921–958. doi: 10.1017/S0020818321000175 . ISSN   0020-8183.
  10. Seo, TaeJun; Horiuchi, Yusaku (2023). "Natural Experiments of the Rally 'Round the Flag Effects Using Worldwide Surveys". Journal of Conflict Resolution. doi:10.1177/00220027231171310. ISSN   0022-0027.
  11. Chávez, Kerry; Wright, James (2022). "International Crisis Termination and Presidential Approval". Foreign Policy Analysis. 18 (3). doi:10.1093/fpa/orac005.
  12. Smith, Tom W. (2003). "Trends: The Cuban Missile Crisis and U.S. Public Opinion". The Public Opinion Quarterly. 67 (2): 265–293. doi:10.1086/374575. JSTOR   3521635.
  13. Callaghan, Karen J.; Virtanen, Simo (1993). "Revised Models of the 'Rally Phenomenon': The Case of the Carter Presidency". The Journal of Politics. 55 (3): 756–764. doi:10.2307/2131999. JSTOR   2131999. S2CID   154739682..
  14. "Bush Job Approval Reflects Record 'Rally' Effect". Gallup.com. Retrieved 2017-10-27.
  15. Curran, Margaret Ann; Schubert, James N.; Stewart, Patrick A. (2002). "A Defining Presidential Moment: 9/11 and the Rally Effect". Political Psychology. 23 (3): 559–583. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00298. JSTOR   3792592.
  16. "Obama Approval Rallies Six Points to 52% After Bin Laden Death". Gallup.com. Retrieved 2017-10-23.
  17. "The Rise and Fall of the Second International". jacobin.com. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Robson, Stuart (2007). The First World War (1 ed.). Harrow, England: Pearson Longman. p. 25. ISBN   978-1-4058-2471-2 via Archive Foundation.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  19. "Social Democratic Party | History, Policies, Platform, Leader, & Structure | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  20. Gilbert, Felix (1984). The End of the European Era, 1890 to the Present (3 ed.). New York: W.W. Norton. pp. 126–140. ISBN   0-393-95440-4. OCLC   11091162.
  21. Gilbert 1984, pp. 66–67.
  22. Gilbert 1984, pp. 47–57.
  23. Thorpe, Andrew (2008). A History of the British Labour Party (3 ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 117–119. ISBN   978-0-230-50010-5. OCLC   222250341.
  24. "How Churchill Led Britain To Victory In The Second World War". Imperial War Museums. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  25. "Winston Churchill - Leadership during World War II | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  26. Arutunyan, Anna. "Putin's move on Crimea bolsters popularity back home". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  27. "Putin's public approval soared as Russia prepared to attack Ukraine. History shows it's unlikely to last". PBS NewsHour. 2022-02-24. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  28. "Zelensky versus Putin: the Personality Factor in Russia's War on Ukraine | Wilson Center". www.wilsoncenter.org. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  29. "Trump's Reelection May Hinge On The Economy — And Coronavirus". fivethirtyeight.com. Retrieved 2020-03-31.
  30. 1 2 3 4 Erlanger, Steven (April 16, 2020). "Popular support Lifts Leaders Everywhere. It May Not Last". The New York Times. p. A6.
  31. "Patient number one; Missing Boris: The illness of a man who once divided the nation has united it". The Economist. April 11–17, 2020. pp. 34–36.
  32. Tir, Jaroslav (2010). "Territorial Diversion: Diversionary Theory of War and Territorial Conflict". The Journal of Politics. 72 (2): 413–425. doi:10.1017/s0022381609990879. JSTOR   10.1017/s0022381609990879. S2CID   154480017.