Yetzer hara

Last updated

In Judaism, yetzer hara (Hebrew : יֵצֶר הַרַע, romanized: yēṣer haraʿ) is a term for humankind's congenital inclination to do evil. The term is drawn from the phrase "the inclination of the heart of man is evil" (Biblical Hebrew : יֵצֶר לֵב הָאָדָם רַע, romanized: yetzer lev-ha-adam ra), which occurs twice at the beginning of the Torah (Genesis 6:5 and Genesis 8:21).

Contents

The Hebrew word yetzer having appeared twice in Genesis occurs again at the end of the Torah: "I knew their devisings that they do". [1] Thus from beginning to end the heart's yetzer (plan) is continually bent on evil. However, the Torah which began with blessing [2] anticipates future blessing [3] which will come as a result of God circumcising the heart in the latter days. [4]

In traditional Judaism, yetzer hara is not a demonic force; despite this, Samael is considered the source of the yetzer hara, through man's misuse of things the physical body needs to survive. Thus, the need for food becomes gluttony due to the yetzer hara. The need for procreation becomes promiscuity, and so on.

The Jewish concept of the yetzer hara is similar to the Christian notion of "fallenness" or a corrupted human nature, known in the Augustinian tradition as concupiscence, humanity's alienation from God and the image of God in oneself and others, resulting in spiritual ignorance and rebellion, the progressive loss of divine likeness, and a tendency to entertain evil thoughts and commit evil acts. However, the genesis of concupiscence is original or ancestral sin, whereas the yetzer hara is a natural aspect of God's creation.

According to the Talmudic tractate Avot de-Rabbi Natan, a boy's evil inclination is greater than his good inclination until he turns 13 (bar mitzvah), at which point the good inclination is "born" and able to control his behavior. [5] Moreover, the rabbis have stated: "The greater the man, the greater his [evil] inclination." [6]

Free will, and the choice between evil and good inclinations

The underlying principle in Jewish thought states that each person—Jew and gentile alike—is born with both a good and an evil inclination. [7] Possessing an evil inclination is considered neither bad nor abnormal. The problem, however, arises when one makes a willful choice to "cross over the line," and seeks to gratify their evil inclination, based on the prototypical models of right and wrong in the Hebrew Bible. [8] This notion is succinctly worded in the Babylonian Talmud: "Everything is determined by heaven, except one's fear of heaven," [9] meaning, everything in a person's life is predetermined by God—except that person's choice to be either righteous or wicked, which is left to their free will.

The Bible states that every person on some occasion succumbs to their evil inclination: "For there is not a righteous man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not." [10] The Talmud speaks of the difficulty in overcoming the evil inclination: "To what is it like, the evil inclination in man? It is like a father who takes his small son, bathes him, douses him with perfume, combs his hair, dresses him up in his finest accoutrements, feeds him, gives him drink, places a bag of money around his neck, and then goes off and puts his son at the front door of a brothel. What can the boy do that he not sin?" [11] In recognition of this difficulty, repentance (and in some cases, affliction) is said to atone for most sins, while the preponderance of good works keeps one within the general class of good people. [12]

Maimonides gave instructions for how to view the evil inclination and ensuing hardships on that account:

...Therefore, let a man prepare his own mind and request from God that anything that should ever happen to him in this world, whether of the things that are by God's providence good, or of the things that are by Him evil, that the reason [for their occurrence] is so that he might attain true happiness. Now this was stated with regard to the Good Inclination [in man] and with regard to [his] Evil Inclination, that is to say, that he might lay to his heart the love of God and his [continued] faith in Him, even at an hour of rebellion or of wrath or of displeasure, seeing that all of this revolves around [man's] evil inclination, just as they have said: 'In all your ways acknowledge Him', [13] [meaning], even in a matter involving transgression. [14]

Moshe Chaim Luzzatto wrote in Derech Hashem that "Man is the creature created for the purpose of being drawn close to God. He is placed between perfection and deficiency, with the power to earn perfection. Man must earn this perfection, however, through his own free will... Man's inclinations are therefore balanced between good (Yetzer HaTov) and evil (Yetzer HaRa), and he is not compelled toward either of them. He has the power of choice and is able to choose either side knowingly and willingly". [15]

The power within man to overcome sin

While God has created mankind with both good and evil inclinations, the two powers or tendencies that pull one in opposite directions, God commands each person to choose the good and right path over the evil. In the narrative of Cain and Abel, God tells Cain: "Isn't it true that if you do good, you shall be forgiven? However, if you will not do good, it is because sin crouches at the entrance [of your heart], and to you shall be its longing, although you have the ability to subdue it." [16] Medieval commentator Rashi explains: "and to you shall be its longing," meaning, the longing of sini.e., the evil inclinationwhich constantly longs and lusts to cause one to stumble, "although you have the ability to subdue it," meaning, if a person wishes, they will overpower it. [17]

The implication is that each person is capable of overcoming sin if they really wish to do so. This may or may not be difficult, and may require some reconditioning, but it is still possible.

Although there are many vices, the Sages of Israel have said that most people are drawn to "stealing" what does not belong to them (גזל), while fewer people are inclined to "uncover the nakedness" of others (גלוי עריות), a euphemism for lechery. [18] On lust, Shalom Shabazi (1619 – c.1720) calls it "a phenomenon of the soul," and lays out ways in which a person tempted by lust can overcome the urge, without being swept into its clutches. [19] [lower-alpha 1]

Idolatry

In rabbinic literature, the yetzer hara is seen as a fundamental force driving humans toward sin, particularly idolatry. This inclination is viewed as an inherent aspect of human nature, leading people away from divine worship and towards the veneration of false gods.

According to a well-known legend from the Talmud, the rabbis at the beginning of the Second Temple period recognized the destructive power of the yetzer hara for idolatry and decided to eliminate it. They engaged in intense prayer and fasting, asking God to remove this inclination from the world. In response, God granted their request, and the rabbis were able to capture the evil inclination for idolatry.

However, the aftermath of this act showed the complexity of their decision; the absence of the yetzer hara also diminished the human drive for other essential aspects of life, such as procreation (see below). How exactly this reality shift played out and continues to be manifest, has been discussed by many scholars including such thinkers as Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak Kook, Rabbi Zadok HaKohen of Lublin, and others. [21]

Positive role of the evil inclination

Rabbinic sources also describe the yetzer hara (when properly channeled) as necessary for the continuation of society, as sexual lust motivates the formation of families, and greed motivates work:

Rabbi Nahman bar Samuel bar Nachman said in the name of Rabbi Samuel bar Nachman: [...] "And behold it was very good" (Genesis 1:31)—this refers to the yetzer hara. But is the yetzer hara indeed very good?!—Were it not for the yetzer hara, a man would not build a home, or marry a woman, or have children, or engage in business. [22]

The Mishnah interprets the Biblical command to love God "with all your heart" [23] to mean "with your two inclinations—good inclination and evil inclination". [24] The latter half of this interpretation has been interpreted in various ways. According to some, it indicates that physical pleasures such as eating and drinking can be a form of service to God, if one's intention is to thereby strengthen the body in order to better serve God. [25]

The yetzer hara is also seen positively in that its existence allows for free will, which in turn allows for reward for those who choose good deeds. [26]

Personification of evil

Although certain ancient groups of Jews appear to have believed in the existence of supernatural evil, in particular fallen angels (as in the Dead Sea scrolls), [27] [28] [29] the yetzer hara in non-apocryphal sources is presented as a personification of evil distinct from the supernatural Devil of traditional Christianity and Islam. This tendency to demythologize Satan is found in the Babylonian Talmud [30] and other rabbinical works, e.g.: "Resh Laqish said: Satan, the evil inclination, and the Angel of Death are all one." [31] Notably, however, this and other passages of the Talmud do not deny the external existence of Satan, but create a synthesis between external and internal forces of evil. [32] [33] [34] Similar tendencies can also be found in some Enlightenment Christian writers, such as in the religious writings of Isaac Newton. [35] [ clarification needed ]

Countering the effects of yetzer hara

Many of the enactments made by the rabbis throughout the centuries are actual "safeguards" to distance a person from their natural inclination and make it harder for them to sin. David's prohibition against yichud (the decree which forbids a man to be secluded in a room with a woman unrelated to him), and the rules outlining the conduct of Jews when entering a public bath house, are a just a few examples.

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Midrash</i> Traditional Jewish exegesis of Biblical texts

Midrash is expansive Jewish Biblical exegesis using a rabbinic mode of interpretation prominent in the Talmud. The word itself means "textual interpretation", "study", or "exegesis", derived from the root verb darash (דָּרַשׁ‎), which means "resort to, seek, seek with care, enquire, require".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jewish principles of faith</span>

Judaism does not centralize authority in any single individual or group. The formulation of principles of faith that are universally recognized by all branches of Judaism remains undefined. There is no central authority in Judaism in existence today - although the Sanhedrin, the supreme Jewish religious court, would fulfill this role if it were re-established. Instead, Judaism's principles of faith remain debated by the rabbis based on their understanding of the sacred writings, laws, and traditions, which collectively shape its theological and ethical framework. The most accepted version in extent is the opinion of Maimonides.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jewish ethics</span> Moral philosophy of the Jewish religion or Jewish people

Jewish ethics are the ethics of the Jewish religion or the Jewish people. A type of normative ethics, Jewish ethics may involve issues in Jewish law as well as non-legal issues, and may involve the convergence of Judaism and the Western philosophical tradition of ethics.

Sons of God is a phrase used in the Tanakh or Old Testament and in Christian Apocrypha. The phrase is also used in Kabbalah where bene elohim are part of different Jewish angelic hierarchies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bereshit (parashah)</span> First weekly Torah portion

Bereshit, Bereishit, Bereshis, Bereishis, or B'reshith is the first weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading. The parashah consists of Genesis 1:1–6:8.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Noach</span> 2nd weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading

Noach is the second weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading. It constitutes Genesis 6:9–11:32. The parashah tells the stories of the Flood and Noah's Ark, of Noah's subsequent drunkenness and cursing of Canaan, and of the Tower of Babel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yitro</span> Seventeenth portion in the annual Jewish cycle of weekly Torah reading

Yitro, Yithro, Yisroi, Yisrau, or Yisro is the seventeenth weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading and the fifth in the Book of Exodus. The parashah tells of Jethro's organizational counsel to Moses and God's revelation of the Ten Commandments to the Israelites at Mount Sinai.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tazria</span> 27th weekly Torah portion

Tazria, Thazria, Thazri'a, Sazria, or Ki Tazria' is the 27th weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading and the fourth in the Book of Leviticus. The parashah deals with ritual impurity. It constitutes Leviticus 12:1–13:59. The parashah is made up of 3,667 Hebrew letters, 1,010 Hebrew words, 67 verses, and 128 lines in a Torah Scroll.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acharei Mot</span> Portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading

Acharei Mot is the 29th weekly Torah portion in the annual cycle of Torah reading in Judaism. It is the sixth parashah or weekly portion (פָּרָשָׁה) in the Book of Leviticus, containing Leviticus 16:1–18:30. It is named after the fifth and sixth Hebrew words of the parashah, its first distinctive words.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shlach</span> Annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading

Shlach, Shelach, Sh'lah, Shlach Lecha, or Sh'lah L'kha is the 37th weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading and the fourth in the Book of Numbers. Its name comes from the first distinctive words in the parashah, in Numbers 13:2. Shelach is the sixth and lecha is the seventh word in the parashah. The parashah tells the story of the twelve spies sent to assess the promised land, commandments about offerings, the story of the Sabbath violator, and the commandment of the fringes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eikev</span> Portion of the Torah

Eikev, Ekev, Ekeb, Aikev, or ʿEqeb is the 46th weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading and the third in the Book of Deuteronomy. It comprises Deuteronomy 7:12–11:25. The parashah tells of the blessings of obedience to God, the dangers of forgetting God, and directions for taking the Land of Israel. Moses recalls the making and re-making of the Tablets of Stone, the incident of the Golden Calf, Aaron's death, the Levites' duties, and exhortations to serve God.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nitzavim</span> Term in Jewish religious reading

Nitzavim, Nitsavim, Nitzabim, Netzavim, Nisavim, or Nesabim is the 51st weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading and the eighth in the Book of Deuteronomy. It comprises Deuteronomy 29:9–30:20. In the parashah, Moses told the Israelites that all the people stood before God to enter into the covenant, violation of which would bring on curses, but if they returned to God and heeded God's commandments, then God would take them back in love and bring them together again from the ends of the world. Moses taught that this Instruction was not beyond reach, and Moses put before the Israelites life and death, blessing and curse, and exhorted them to choose life by loving God and heeding the commandments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Job in rabbinic literature</span>

Allusions in rabbinic literature to the Biblical character Job, the object of sufferings and tribulations in the Book of Job, contain various expansions, elaborations and inferences beyond what is presented in the text of the Bible itself.

Shituf is a term used in Jewish sources for the worship of God in a manner which Judaism does not deem to be purely monotheistic. The term connotes a theology that is not outright polytheistic, but also should not be seen as purely monotheistic. The term is primarily used in reference to the Christian Trinity by Jewish legal authorities who wish to distinguish Christianity from full-blown polytheism. Though a Jew would be forbidden from maintaining a shituf theology, non-Jews would, in some form, be permitted such a theology without being regarded as idolaters by Jews. That said, whether Christianity is shituf or formal polytheism remains a debate in Jewish philosophy.

The Hebrew term kareth, or extirpation, is a form of punishment for sin, mentioned in the Hebrew Bible and later Jewish writings. The typical Biblical phrase used is "that soul shall be cut off from its people" or a slight variation of this. Several different suggestions have been made for the understanding of this punishment in the Bible and in rabbinic thought.

Judaism regards the violation of any of the 613 commandments as a sin. Judaism teaches that to sin is a part of life, since there is no perfect human and everyone has an inclination to do evil "from youth", though people are born sinless. Sin has many classifications and degrees.

Jewish traditions across different eras and regions devote considerable attention to sexuality. Sexuality is the subject of many narratives and laws in the Tanakh and rabbinic literature.

The Tzoah Rotachat in the Talmud and the Zohar is a location in Gehenna where the souls of Jews who committed certain sins are sent for punishment.

In kabbalah, the divine soul is the source of good inclination, or yetzer tov, and Godly desires.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anger in Judaism</span>

Anger in Judaism is treated as a negative trait to be avoided whenever possible. The subject of anger is treated in a range of Jewish sources, from the Hebrew Bible and Talmud to the rabbinical law, Kabbalah, Hasidism, and contemporary Jewish sources.

References

  1. Deuteronomy 31:21
  2. Genesis 1:1–2:3
  3. Deuteronomy 33
  4. Deuteronomy 30:6
  5. Avot deRabbi Natan 16
  6. Babylonian Talmud (Sukkah 52a)
  7. Yalkut Shimoni , Genesis (chapter 2)
  8. Moses Mielziner, Introduction to the Talmud (3rd ed.), New York 1925, pp. 269–270.
  9. Niddah 16b; compare to Pirke Avot 3:18: "All things are foreseen [by God], yet the choice is given [to man], and the world is judged on [its] merits."
  10. Ecclesiastes 7:20 (Jewish Publication Society translation)
  11. Berakhot 32a
  12. Pirkei Avot 3:18 [17]
  13. Proverbs 3:6
  14. Maimonides, Commentary to Mishnah, Brachot 9:5
  15. Way of God, Moshe Ḥayyim Luzzatto, 1998. "He has the power of choice, and is able to choose either side, knowingly and willingly, and possess whichever one he wishes. Man was therefore created with both a Good Urge (Yetzer HaTov) and an Evil Urge (Yetzer HaRa)."
  16. Genesis 4:7
  17. See also Sifrei on Deuteronomy, P. Ekev 45, Kidd. 30b
  18. Babylonian Talmud (Baba Bathra 165a)
  19. Tobi, Yosef [in Hebrew] (1989–1990). "Medical Books of Yemenite Jewry". Jerusalem Studies in Jewish Folklore (in Hebrew). 11/12: 114 (note 46). JSTOR   23356313., citing Shabazi's work, Sefer ha-Margalith, now at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, Ms. 2672, pp. 168a–173a.
  20. Shalom Shabazi, Sefer ha-Margalith (Concerning the illness of lust)
  21. See Klein, Reuven Chaim (2018). "The End of an Age: Idolatry as an Obsolete Superstition". God versus Gods: Judasim in the Age of Idolatry. Mosaica Press. pp. 244–276. ISBN   978-1946351463. OL   27322748M.
  22. Genesis Rabbah 9:7; see also Yoma 69b
  23. Deuteronomy 6:5
  24. Mishna Brachot 9:5
  25. Tiferet Yisrael and Kehati to Mishna Brachot 9:5
  26. אנציקלופדיה יהודית דעת – בחירה חופשית
  27. Dorothy M. Peters Noah traditions in the Dead Sea scrolls 2008 "Devorah Dimant, "'The Fallen Angels' in the Dead Sea Scrolls and in the Apocryphal and Pseudepigraphic Books Related to Them" (English summary of Ph.D diss., Hebrew University, 1974), 4–7.
  28. Collins J Apocalypticism in the Dead Sea Scrolls 1997 "In the Book of the Watchers, the judgment on the fallen angels provides the occasion for Enoch's ascent to heaven. This is the oldest Jewish account that we have of a 'round-trip' journey to heaven, where the visionary ascends to heaven".
  29. Bohak G. Ancient Jewish magic: a history 2008 "Magic in 1 Enoch, Jubilees, and the Dead Sea Scrolls [...] which may be dated in the third century bce, tells the story of the Fallen Angels, those "sons of God" who lusted..."
  30. Baba Batra 16a
  31. The Jewish Religion: A Companion. p. 443. Louis Jacobs, 1995. "Very revealing of the demythologizing tendency in Rabbinic thought is the saying (Bava Batra 16a) that Satan, the yetzer hara ('evil inclination', see yetzer ha tov and yetzer hara) and the Angel of Death are one and the same."
  32. The same folio Baba Bathra 16a cites a Tanna making a statement which illuminates the three functions of satan (accuser), evil inclination and angel of death in a way that makes it clear that a personal being is in view: "[Satan] comes down to earth and seduces, then ascends to heaven and awakens wrath; permission is granted to him and he takes away the soul."
  33. Reeg, G. (2013). The devil in rabbinic literature. In I. Fröhlich & E. Koskenniemi (Eds.), Evil and the Devil (pp. 71–83). Bloomsbury T&T Clark, makes the following comment on b. Berakhoth 19a (in which Satan disguises himself as a woman): "He visualizes carnal desire and can therefore be equated with the evil inclination. One difference, however, cannot be ignored: Satan is an independent figure, while the evil inclination is part of a human being" (p. 79).
  34. Dahms, J.V. (1974). Lead us not into temptation. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 17(4), 223–230, comments that two rabbinic texts (b. Sanhedrin 107a and Ex. Rabbah 19.2) seem to imply "that temptation is by the permission of God, that the evil yetzer is its internal possibility and that Satan is the external power responsible for its onset" (p. 228).
  35. Newton and Newtonianism: new studies 174 James E. Force, Sarah Hutton, 2004 "Newton's later expressions about the nature of Satan are for practical purposes indistinguishable from the Jewish 'evil yetzer'."

Notes

  1. Concerning lust and overt sensual desire, Shabazi wrote that he knows of no prescribed formula or antidote for those possessed by such traits, and that only God can heal such persons. He goes on to say that it is best for him to purge from his heart such thoughts, and to distance the matter so that it will not become an obsession with him. This, he says, is possible by replacing it with happiness, such as that which comes about by listening to song and other things that bring on happiness, and to accustom one's self to look upon nature (such as water, and green foliage and pleasant faces). [20]

Further reading