Ornitholestes

Last updated

Ornitholestes
Temporal range: Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), 154  Ma
Ꞓ
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
↓
Ornitholestes Royal Tyrrell 2.jpg
Skeleton mount, Royal Tyrrell Museum
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Theropoda
Clade: Tyrannoraptora
Clade: Maniraptoromorpha
Genus:† Ornitholestes
Osborn, 1903
Type species
†Ornitholestes hermanni
Osborn, 1903

Ornitholestes (meaning "bird robber") is a small theropod dinosaur of the late Jurassic (Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation, middle Kimmeridgian age, about 154 million years ago [1] ) of Western Laurasia (the area that was to become North America).

Contents

To date, Ornitholestes is known only from a single partial skeleton with a badly crushed skull found at the Bone Cabin Quarry near Medicine Bow, Wyoming, in 1900. It was described by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1903. An incomplete hand was later attributed to Ornitholestes, although it now appears to belong to Tanycolagreus . The type (and only known) species is O. hermanni. The specific name honors the American Museum of Natural History preparator Adam Hermann.

Discovery and naming

Mounted holotype specimen Ornitholestes Holotype AMNH.jpg
Mounted holotype specimen

Ornitholestes was the first theropod to be discovered in the 1900s. [2] The holotype skeleton (AMNH 619) was excavated in July 1900 in the Bone Cabin Quarry in Wyoming by an American Museum of Natural History expedition by Peter C. Kaisen, Paul Miller and Frederic Brewster Loomis. [3] [4] It represents a partial skeleton with skull, including numerous elements of the vertebral column, the forelimbs, pelvis and hindlimbs. Henry Fairfield Osborn named and scientifically described the specimen in 1903. [5] The genus name Ornitholestes, initially suggested by Theodore Gill, means "bird robber" and is derived from the Greek ὄρνις/ornis, ornithos ("bird") and λῃστήσ/lestes ("robber"). [6] [7] The species name (O. hermanni) honors Adam Hermann, the head preparator at the Museum, who directed the restoration and mounting of the skeleton. [3]

An incomplete hand (AMNH 587) was assigned to Ornitholestes by Osborn in his 1903 description of the genus. [8] However, as Gregory S. Paul (1988) noted, the poor preservation of the corresponding elements in the type specimen made this association "tentative." [9] In 2005, Kenneth Carpenter et al. described a new small theropod, Tanycolagreus , whose skeleton was found in Bone Cabin Quarry only a few hundred yards from AMNH 587. [10] Since AMNH 587 was virtually identical to the preserved hand of the Tanycolagreus type specimen, it is now considered to belong to that dinosaur and not to Ornitholestes. [11] Following this reassignment, Phil Senter (2006) noted that "our knowledge of Ornitholestes can be drawn now only from the holotype." [12] John Foster (2007) reported that some fragments from Dry Mesa Quarry may belong to Ornitholestes, [13] though these have not yet been described.

In 1920 Charles Whitney Gilmore concluded that Ornitholestes was identical to Coelurus ; [14] in 1934 Oliver Perry Hay recognised only a difference at the species level, naming a Coelurus hermanni, [15] but in 1980 John Ostrom revived the genus. [16]

Description

Size comparison of Ornitholestes Ornitholestes Scale.svg
Size comparison of Ornitholestes

In his 1903 description, Osborn wrote that the length of Ornitholestes along "the skull and vertebral column as restored" was 2.22 m (7.28 ft). [3] However, this reconstruction was inaccurate, being based in part on Othniel Charles Marsh's restoration of the basal sauropodomorph Anchisaurus , and the neck and trunk were both too elongated. [17] David Norman (1985) and John Foster (2007) both estimated that Ornitholestes was about 2 m (6.6 ft) long. [18] Gregory S. Paul's 1988 Predatory Dinosaurs of the World listed the length of Ornitholestes as approximately 2.08 m (6.82 ft). [19] Paul (1988) and Foster (2007) both estimated that Ornitholestes weighed 12.6 kg (27.8 lb). [20] John A. Long and Peter Schouten (2008) suggested a slightly higher figure, 15 kg (33 lb). [21]

Ornitholestes was a bipedal carnivore. [22] Its head was proportionally smaller than that of most other predatory dinosaurs, but the skull was heavily built, with a short snout and robust lower jaw. [23] The orbits (eye sockets) were quite large, measuring over 25 percent of the skull's length. [24] There is no indication of a bony eye ring. [25]

Life restoration Ornitholestes reconstruction.png
Life restoration

The front teeth of Ornitholestes were somewhat conical, with reduced serrations; the back teeth were recurved and more sharply serrated, similar to those of other theropod dinosaurs. [26] Henry Fairfield Osborn (1903) counted four teeth in the premaxilla, of which the front tooth was the largest in the upper jaw. [27] In contrast, Gregory S. Paul (1988) depicted the skull with only three premaxillary teeth remaining, much smaller than those illustrated by Osborn. [28] Each maxilla (main tooth-bearing bone in the upper jaw) contained ten teeth, and each dentary (tooth-bearing bone in the lower jaw) contained twelve teeth. [29] The tooth rows of Ornitholestes were short, with the dentary (lower) row being even shorter than the maxillary (upper) row, [30] even though the dentary bone itself was exceptionally long at the back, reaching a point below the middle of the eye socket. [31] Teeth did not extend as far back as the orbits, and neither tooth row spanned much more than one-third of the skull. [32]

Illustration of the holotype skull Ornitholestes skull.jpg
Illustration of the holotype skull

An area of broken bone near the external naris (nostril) appears to bulge upward, which led Gregory S. Paul to suggest in Predatory Dinosaurs of the World (1988) that Ornitholestes had a nasal horn "rather like a chicken's comb in looks." [33] Both Oliver W.M. Rauhut (2003) and Kenneth Carpenter et al. (2005a) rejected that interpretation, and indicated that the upward flare of bone was due to post-mortem crushing of the skull. [34] Paul's updated illustration of Ornitholestes in his 2010 Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs no longer contains the nasal horn. [35]

Hand of the holotype, with the first finger restored on the right Ornitholestes hand.jpg
Hand of the holotype, with the first finger restored on the right

Ornitholestes had a relatively short neck with a slight sigmoidal (S-shaped) curve. [36] The tail was long and whiplike, comprising over half of the body's length. [37] Not all of the vertebrae were preserved, but Osborn (1917) estimated that Ornitholestes had nine or ten cervical (neck) vertebrae, thirteen dorsal (back) vertebrae, four sacral (hip) vertebrae, and 39 to 44 caudal (tail) vertebrae. [38] Carpenter et al. (2005a) recorded that the specimen contained five sacral vertebrae. [39] Ornitholestes was a short-bodied theropod, and this was reflected in the short front-to-back dimensions of the cervical and dorsal vertebrae. [40]

The forelimbs of Ornitholestes were relatively long, slightly under two-thirds the length of the hind legs. [41] The humerus (upper arm bone) was heavily built, and somewhat longer than the radius and ulna (forearm bones). [42] Both the humerus and radius were straight-shafted. [43] The claws on digits I and II of the hand were about the same size. [44] Although the hand's third ungual (claw bone) was not preserved, extrapolation from the closest relatives of Ornitholestes indicates that it was probably shorter than the first two. [44]

Ornitholestes is often portrayed as a fast, long-legged theropod, but its lower limb bones were fairly short. [45] Osborn (1917) calculated that the, missing, tibia (shin bone) was only about 70.6% as long as the femur (thigh bone). [46] The metatarsals (foot bones) were spaced closely, but not fused together. [47] As is typical of theropods, the feet were tridactyl (with three clawed weight-bearing toes). [48] John H. Ostrom (1969) noted that the claw of digit II (the innermost toe) was larger than those of digits III and IV, and suggested that this digit may have borne a modified sickle claw similar to that of Deinonychus . [49] However, as both Ostrom (1969) and Paul (1988) noted, the poor preservation of digit II makes this hypothesis difficult to confirm. [50]

Classification

The infraorder Coelurosauria, coined in 1914 by Friedrich von Huene, was traditionally a taxonomic wastebasket into which all small theropods were placed. [51] Ornitholestes, due to its small size, was therefore generally classified as a coelurosaur. [52] In 1986, Jacques Gauthier redefined this and several other paleontological terms in a more rigorous fashion, based on cladistic methods. Tetanurae was defined as modern birds and all theropods more closely related to modern birds than to ceratosaurs, while Coelurosauria now comprised all members of Tetanurae more closely related to modern birds than to carnosaurs. [53] In 1988, Gregory S. Paul suggested that Ornitholestes was very similar in skull structure to Proceratosaurus , a Middle Jurassic theropod from England. [25] He placed these two genera together in Ornitholestinae—a new subfamily under Allosauridae—and speculated that they were more closely related to the much larger Allosaurus than to other small theropods. [54] However, the classification of Ornitholestes and Proceratosaurus as allosaur relatives proved untenable (the latter has since proved to be a tyrannosauroid), and Paul eventually abandoned it. [55] All published cladistic analyses have shown Ornitholestes to be a coelurosaur as defined by Gauthier. Some analysis have shown support for the hypothesis that it is the most primitive member of the group Maniraptora, though more thorough analyses have suggested it is more primitive than the Maniraptoriformes, and possibly a close relative of the "compsognathid" Juravenator starkii . [56]

The early 20th century mount of the holotype skeleton at the AMNH, which stands much the same today Ornitholestesskeleton.JPG
The early 20th century mount of the holotype skeleton at the AMNH, which stands much the same today

The following family tree illustrates a synthesis of the relationships of the major coelurosaurian groups based on various studies conducted in the 2010s. [57]

Coelurosauria

† Bicentenaria

† Zuolong Zuolong salleei.jpg

Tyrannoraptora

†Tyrannosauroidea Tyrannosaurus-rex-Profile-steveoc86 (coloured).png

unnamed

In an abstract presented at the 2021 conference of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Kimberley Chapelle and colleagues found "robust evidence" that Ornitholestes is the earliest-diverging oviraptorosaur, based on a CT scan analysis of the skull. [58]

Paleobiology

In a 2001 study conducted by Bruce Rothschild and other paleontologists, 20 foot bones referred to Ornitholestes were examined for signs of stress fracture, but none were found. [59]

Forelimb function

A biomechanical study conducted by Phil Senter (2006) used articulated casts of the Ornitholestes type specimen's right forelimb to determine its range of motion. [60] Senter found that the antebrachium (forearm) could swing freely within a 95° range. [61] When flexed (bent inward) at the elbow joint to the maximum possible extent, the humerus (upper arm bone) and radius (a lower arm bone) formed a 53° angle. [61] The ability of Ornitholestes to bend the forearm to an angle significantly more acute than 90° is characteristic of Maniraptoriformes, but absent in more primitive theropods such as Coelophysis and Allosaurus. [62]

Even when fully extended (straightened) at the elbow, the forearm did not form a straight angle, falling short of this by 22°. [61] Pronation (twisting to make the palmar side of the hand face downwards) of the forearm was impossible, because the radius and ulna lacked rolling surfaces, meaning the forearm was in a permanent state of supination. [44]

When Ornitholestes bent its elbows, this would cause the forearms to move inward, towards its midline. [63] It may have used that ability to grasp prey with both hands simultaneously. [64]

Diet

This illustration by Charles R. Knight portrays Ornitholestes hunting Archaeopteryx, though they were not contemporaries The American Museum journal (c1900-(1918)) (17537482124).jpg
This illustration by Charles R. Knight portrays Ornitholestes hunting Archaeopteryx , though they were not contemporaries

Henry Fairfield Osborn, in his 1903 description of Ornitholestes, noted its large and conical front teeth, the "rapid grasping power" of its hand, and the "balancing power" of its tail; these he interpreted as adaptations to prey on contemporary birds. [3] Osborn later repudiated this hypothesis, suggesting in 1917 that Ornitholestes presented the early stages of a transition from a carnivorous to a more herbivorous lifestyle, but not before Charles R. Knight had drawn an influential and widely published illustration of Ornitholestes chasing Archaeopteryx. [65] Knight's illustration, and others derived from it, continued to appear in dinosaur books aimed at a popular audience throughout the 20th century. [52]

David Norman (1985) conceded it was "just possible, though not very likely" that Ornitholestes might have caught and eaten primitive birds. [66] Most recent authors, however, have instead suggested a diet of small terrestrial vertebrates. Frogs, salamanders, mammals, lizards, rhynchocephalians, and hatchling dinosaurs would all have been potential prey items. [67] Gregory S. Paul (1988) thought that Ornitholestes might have used its conical front teeth to catch fish. [33] Norman (1985) suggested that the robust skull and jaws might have allowed Ornitholestes to tackle "larger and more active prey" than other small theropods. [68] In this vein, David Lambert (1993) speculated that Ornitholestes, if it was a pack hunter, might have been able to "take on ornithopods as big as a half-grown Camptosaurus ." [69]

In 2007, John Foster, a specialist on the Morrison Formation, suggested the possibility of niche partitioning between Ornitholestes and its contemporary Coelurus, which was within the same size range. [70] He theorized that big-eyed Ornitholestes might have been specialized for nocturnal hunting, while Coelurus may have focused on those prey species that were active during the day. [70] Foster noted, however, that this hypothesis was largely speculative; a lack of preserved skull material from Coelurus makes it impossible to verify whether its eyes were proportionally smaller than those of Ornitholestes. [71]

Paul (1988) estimated that a 12 kg (26 lb) endothermic Ornitholestes would have a daily dietary requirement of about 700 g (1.54 lb) of flesh. [72]

Feathers

Ornithologist Percy Lowe hypothesized in 1944 that Ornitholestes might have borne feathers. [73] However, this interpretation was largely disregarded for over half a century; most reconstructions of theropod dinosaurs, including Ornitholestes, portrayed them with reptile-like scaly skin. One of the few exceptions to this was Gregory S. Paul's Predatory Dinosaurs of the World (1988). [74] Robert T. Bakker's The Dinosaur Heresies (1986) accurately predicted the presence of feathers on dromaeosaurids and contended that all dinosaurs were endothermic, yet did not incorporate feathers in its illustration of Ornitholestes. [75]

In 1996, the primitive coelurosaur Sinosauropteryx was discovered in China. The well-preserved fossil showed that this dinosaur bore a coat of rudimentary furlike feathers. As a result of this and other similar discoveries, most paleontologists now consider it likely that all coelurosaurs had insulating feathers of some kind, or were descended from ancestors that did. [76] Based on its phylogenetic position, John Foster (2007) inferred that the feathers of Ornitholestes would probably have been more primitive than those of birds; they likely "would have covered the body except the legs in a short coat, perhaps with longer feathers lining the top of the skull or neck and the back edge of the forearms." [77] Assuming they were present, these feathers would have been used for insulation, and possibly also for brooding eggs. [77]

Related Research Articles

<i>Allosaurus</i> Extinct genus of carnosaurian theropod dinosaur

Allosaurus is an extinct genus of large carnosaurian theropod dinosaur that lived 155 to 145 million years ago during the Late Jurassic period. The name "Allosaurus" means "different lizard", alluding to its unique concave vertebrae. It is derived from the Greek words ἄλλος and σαῦρος. The first fossil remains that could definitively be ascribed to this genus were described in 1877 by famed paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh. As one of the first well-known theropod dinosaurs, it has long attracted attention outside of paleontological circles.

<i>Deinonychus</i> Genus of theropod dinosaur

Deinonychus is a genus of dromaeosaurid theropod dinosaur with one described species, Deinonychus antirrhopus. This species, which could grow up to 3.4 meters (11 ft) long, lived during the early Cretaceous Period, about 115–108 million years ago. Fossils have been recovered from the U.S. states of Montana, Utah, Wyoming, and Oklahoma, in rocks of the Cloverly Formation and Antlers Formation, though teeth that may belong to Deinonychus have been found much farther east in Maryland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theropoda</span> Clade of dinosaurs

Theropoda whose members are known as theropods, is an extant dinosaur clade that is characterized by hollow bones and three toes and claws on each limb. Theropods are generally classed as a group of saurischian dinosaurs. They were ancestrally carnivorous, although a number of theropod groups evolved to become herbivores and omnivores. Theropods first appeared during the Carnian age of the late Triassic period 231.4 million years ago (Ma) and included the majority of large terrestrial carnivores from the Early Jurassic until at least the close of the Cretaceous, about 66 Ma. In the Jurassic, birds evolved from small specialized coelurosaurian theropods, and are today represented by about 11,000 living species.

<i>Compsognathus</i> Genus of dinosaurs

Compsognathus is a genus of small, bipedal, carnivorous theropod dinosaur. Members of its single species Compsognathus longipes could grow to around the size of a chicken. They lived about 150 million years ago, during the Tithonian age of the late Jurassic period, in what is now Europe. Paleontologists have found two well-preserved fossils, one in Germany in the 1850s and the second in France more than a century later. Today, C. longipes is the only recognized species, although the larger specimen discovered in France in the 1970s was once thought to belong to a separate species and named C. corallestris.

Coeluridae is a historically unnatural group of generally small, carnivorous dinosaurs from the late Jurassic Period. For many years, any small Jurassic or Cretaceous theropod that did not belong to one of the more specialized families recognized at the time was classified with the coelurids, creating a confusing array of 'coelurid' theropods that were not closely related. Although they have been traditionally included in this family, there is no evidence that any of these primitive coelurosaurs form a natural group with Coelurus, the namesake of Coeluridae, to the exclusion of other traditional coelurosaur groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maniraptora</span> Clade of dinosaurs

Maniraptora is a clade of coelurosaurian dinosaurs which includes the birds and the non-avian dinosaurs that were more closely related to them than to Ornithomimus velox. It contains the major subgroups Avialae, Dromaeosauridae, Troodontidae, Oviraptorosauria, and Therizinosauria. Ornitholestes and the Alvarezsauroidea are also often included. Together with the next closest sister group, the Ornithomimosauria, Maniraptora comprises the more inclusive clade Maniraptoriformes. Maniraptorans first appear in the fossil record during the Jurassic Period, and survive today as living birds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coelurosauria</span> Clade of dinosaurs

Coelurosauria is the clade containing all theropod dinosaurs more closely related to birds than to carnosaurs.

<i>Ceratosaurus</i> Genus of theropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic period

Ceratosaurus was a carnivorous theropod dinosaur that lived in the Late Jurassic period. The genus was first described in 1884 by American paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh based on a nearly complete skeleton discovered in Garden Park, Colorado, in rocks belonging to the Morrison Formation. The type species is Ceratosaurus nasicornis.

<i>Struthiomimus</i> Extinct genus of reptile

Struthiomimus, meaning "ostrich-mimic", is a genus of ornithomimid dinosaurs from the late Cretaceous of North America. Ornithomimids were long-legged, bipedal, ostrich-like dinosaurs with toothless beaks. The type species, Struthiomimus altus, is one of the more common, smaller dinosaurs found in Dinosaur Provincial Park; their overall abundance—in addition to their toothless beak—suggests that these animals were mainly herbivorous or omnivorous, rather than purely carnivorous. Similar to the modern extant ostriches, emus, and rheas, ornithomimid dinosaurs likely lived as opportunistic omnivores, supplementing a largely plant-based diet with a variety of small mammals, reptiles, amphibians, insects, invertebrates, and anything else they could fit into their mouth, as they foraged.

Coelurus is a genus of coelurosaurian dinosaur from the Late Jurassic period. The name means "hollow tail", referring to its hollow tail vertebrae. Although its name is linked to one of the main divisions of theropods (Coelurosauria), it has historically been poorly understood, and sometimes confused with its better-known contemporary Ornitholestes. Like many dinosaurs studied in the early years of paleontology, it has had a confusing taxonomic history, with several species being named and later transferred to other genera or abandoned. Only one species is currently recognized as valid: the type species, C. fragilis, described by Othniel Charles Marsh in 1879. It is known from one partial skeleton found in the Morrison Formation of Wyoming, United States. It was a small bipedal carnivore with elongate legs.

<i>Proceratosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Proceratosaurus is a genus of carnivorous theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) of England. It contains a single species. P. bradleyi, known from a mostly complete skull and lower jaws. Proceratosaurus was a small dinosaur, estimated to measure around 3 m (9.8 ft) in length. Its name refers to how it was originally thought to be an ancestor of Ceratosaurus, due to the partially preserved portion of the crest of Proceratosaurus superficially resembling the small crest of Ceratosaurus. Now, however, it is considered a coelurosaur, specifically a member of the family Proceratosauridae, and amongst the earliest known members of the clade Tyrannosauroidea.

<i>Elaphrosaurus</i> Ceratosaurian theropod dinosaur genus from the Late Jurassic Period

Elaphrosaurus is a genus of ceratosaurian theropod dinosaur that lived approximately 154 to 150 million years ago during the Late Jurassic Period in what is now Tanzania in Africa. Elaphrosaurus was a medium-sized but lightly built member of the group that could grow up to 6.2 m (20 ft) long. Morphologically, this dinosaur is significant in two ways. Firstly, it has a relatively long body but is very shallow-chested for a theropod of its size. Secondly, it has very short hindlimbs in comparison with its body. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that this genus is likely a ceratosaur. Earlier suggestions that it is a late surviving coelophysoid have been examined but generally dismissed. Elaphrosaurus is currently believed to be a very close relative of Limusaurus, an unusual beaked ceratosaurian which may have been either herbivorous or omnivorous.

<i>Xinjiangovenator</i> Genus of coelurosaurian dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous period

Xinjiangovenator is a genus of coelurosaurian dinosaurs, possibly part of the group Maniraptora, which lived during the Early Cretaceous period, sometime between the Valanginian and Albian stages. The remains of Xinjiangovenator were found in the Lianmuqin Formation of Wuerho, Xinjiang, China, and were first described by Dong Zhiming in 1973. The genus is based on a single specimen, an articulated partial right lower leg, containing the tibia, three pieces of the fibula, the calcaneum and the astragalus. This specimen, IVPP V4024-2, is the holotype of the genus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tyrannosauroidea</span> Extinct superfamily of dinosaurs

Tyrannosauroidea is a superfamily of coelurosaurian theropod dinosaurs that includes the family Tyrannosauridae as well as more basal relatives. Tyrannosauroids lived on the Laurasian supercontinent beginning in the Jurassic Period. By the end of the Cretaceous Period, tyrannosauroids were the dominant large predators in the Northern Hemisphere, culminating in the gigantic Tyrannosaurus. Fossils of tyrannosauroids have been recovered on what are now the continents of North America, Europe and Asia, with fragmentary remains possibly attributable to tyrannosaurs also known from South America and Australia.

<i>Calamosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Calamosaurus was a genus of small theropod dinosaur from the Barremian-age Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, England. It is based on two cervical vertebrae, collected by Reverend William Fox.

<i>Tanycolagreus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Tanycolagreus is a genus of coelurosaurian theropod from the Late Jurassic of North America.

<i>Marshosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Marshosaurus is a genus of medium-sized carnivorous theropod dinosaur, belonging to the family Piatnitzkysauridae, from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah and possibly Colorado.

<i>Zuolong</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Zuolong is an extinct genus of tetanuran theropod from the Late Jurassic period of China. The type and only species is Z. salleei. The generic name of Zuolong is in honor of General Zuo Zōngtáng with the Chinese word "long" which means dragon. The specific epithet "salleei" is in honor of Hilmar Sallee, who funded the expedition which led to the specimen's discovery.

<i>The Origin of Birds</i> Book by Gerhard Heilmann

The Origin of Birds is an early synopsis of bird evolution written in 1926 by Gerhard Heilmann, a Danish artist and amateur zoologist. The book was born from a series of articles published between 1913 and 1916 in Danish, and although republished as a book it received mainly criticism from established scientists and got little attention within Denmark. The English edition of 1926, however, became highly influential at the time due to the breadth of evidence synthesized as well as the artwork used to support its arguments. It was considered the last word on the subject of bird evolution for several decades after its publication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of tyrannosaur research</span>

This timeline of tyrannosaur research is a chronological listing of events in the history of paleontology focused on the tyrannosaurs, a group of predatory theropod dinosaurs that began as small, long-armed bird-like creatures with elaborate cranial ornamentation but achieved apex predator status during the Late Cretaceous as their arms shrank and body size expanded. Although formally trained scientists did not begin to study tyrannosaur fossils until the mid-19th century, these remains may have been discovered by Native Americans and interpreted through a mythological lens. The Montana Crow tradition about thunder birds with two claws on their feet may have been inspired by isolated tyrannosaurid forelimbs found locally. Other legends possibly inspired by tyrannosaur remains include Cheyenne stories about a mythical creature called the Ahke, and Delaware stories about smoking the bones of ancient monsters to have wishes granted.

References

  1. ↑ Turner, C.E. and Peterson, F., (1999). "Biostratigraphy of dinosaurs in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of the Western Interior, U.S.A." Pp. 77–114 in Gillette, D.D. (ed.), Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah. Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 99-1.
  2. ↑ Fastovsky and Weishampel (2005), p. 291
  3. 1 2 3 4 Osborn (1903), p. 459
  4. ↑ Paul D. Brinkman, 2010, The Second Jurassic Dinosaur Rush: Museums & Paleontology in America at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. University of Chicago Press, 345 pp., ISBN   978-0-226-07472-6
  5. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 459–464
  6. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 459; Osborn (1917), p. 733
  7. ↑ Colbert, Edwin H. (Edwin Harris); Knight, Charles Robert (1951). The dinosaur book: the ruling reptiles and their relatives. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 152.
  8. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 459; Osborn (1917), p. 736
  9. ↑ Paul (1988b), p. 3
  10. ↑ Carpenter et al. (2005b), p. 23, 39
  11. ↑ Carpenter et al. (2005b), p. 39
  12. ↑ Senter (2006), p. 1029
  13. ↑ Foster (2007), p. 78, 179
  14. ↑ Gilmore, C.W., 1920, "Osteology of the carnivorous Dinosauria in the United States National Museum, with special reference to the genera Antrodemus (Allosaurus) and Ceratosaurus", Bulletin U.S. National MuseumCX: 1-154
  15. ↑ Hay, O.P., 1930, Second Bibliography and Catalogue of the Fossil Vertebrata of North America. Carnegie Institution of Washington. 390(II): 1-1074
  16. ↑ Ostrom (1980)
  17. ↑ Osborn (1917), p. 735; Paul (1988b), p. 3
  18. ↑ Norman (1985), p. 39; Foster (2007), p. 178
  19. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 305
  20. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 305; Foster (2007), p. 178
  21. ↑ Long and Schouten (2008), p. 73
  22. ↑ Lambert (1993), p. 79
  23. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 306; Norman (1985), p. 42; Norman (1990), p. 293
  24. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 460; Chure (1998), p. 238
  25. 1 2 Paul (1988b), p. 6
  26. ↑ Paul (1988b), p. 3; Norman (1990), p. 293
  27. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 460; Osborn (1917), p. 734
  28. ↑ Paul (1988b), p. 4; Norman (1990), p. 293
  29. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 460
  30. ↑ Paul (1988b), p. 3; Norman (1990), p. 292
  31. ↑ Cristiano dal Sasso & Simone Maganuco, 2011, Scipionyx samniticus (Theropoda: Compsognathidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Italy — Osteology, ontogenetic assessment, phylogeny, soft tissue anatomy, taphonomy and palaeobiology, Memorie della Società Italiana de Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano XXXVII(I): 1-281
  32. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 460; Norman (1990), p. 293
  33. 1 2 Paul (1988a), p. 303
  34. ↑ Rauhut (2003), p. 27; Carpenter et al. (2005a), p. 53
  35. ↑ Paul (2010), p. 123
  36. ↑ Carpenter et al. (2005a), pp. 49, 54
  37. ↑ Osborn (1917), p. 734; Lambert (1993), p. 78
  38. ↑ Osborn (1917), p. 735–736
  39. ↑ Carpenter et al. (2005a), p. 58
  40. ↑ Carpenter et al. (2005a), p. 49, 69
  41. ↑ Ostrom (1969), p. 146; Paul (2002), p. 236
  42. ↑ Osborn (1917), p. 738; Carpenter et al. (2005b), p. 45
  43. ↑ Carpenter et al. (2005a), p. 60, 62
  44. 1 2 3 Senter (2006), p. 1030
  45. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 306
  46. ↑ Osborn (1917), p. 737
  47. ↑ Carpenter et al. (2005a), p. 67
  48. ↑ Osborn (1903), p. 463
  49. ↑ Ostrom (1969), p. 161
  50. ↑ Ostrom (1969), p. 161; Paul (1988b), p. 6
  51. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 188–189; Norman (1990), p. 280
  52. 1 2 Glut (1997), p. 645
  53. ↑ Holtz et al. (2004), p. 71
  54. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 302; Paul (1988b), p. 3, 6
  55. ↑ Paul (2010), p. 124
  56. ↑ Godefroit, Pascal; Cau, Andrea; Hu, Dong-Yu; Escuillié, François; Wu, Wenhao; Dyke, Gareth (2013). "A Jurassic avialan dinosaur from China resolves the early phylogenetic history of birds". Nature. 498 (7454): 359–362. Bibcode:2013Natur.498..359G. doi:10.1038/nature12168. PMID   23719374. S2CID   4364892.
  57. ↑ Hendrickx, C., Hartman, S.A., & Mateus, O. (2015). An Overview of Non- Avian Theropod Discoveries and Classification. PalArch’s Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology, 12(1): 1-73.
  58. ↑ Chapelle, Kimberley E.; Norell, Mark; Ford, David P.; Hendrickx, Christophe; Radermacher, Viktor J.; Balanoff, Amy; Zanno, Lindsay E.; Choiniere, Jonah N. (2021). "A CT-based revised description and phylogenetic analysis of the skull of the basal maniraptoran Ornitholestes hermanni Osborn 1903". Conference program of the 81st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology.
  59. ↑ Rothschild, B., Tanke, D. H., and Ford, T. L., 2001, Theropod stress fractures and tendon avulsions as a clue to activity: In: Mesozoic Vertebrate Life, edited by Tanke, D. H., and Carpenter, K., Indiana University Press, p. 331-336.
  60. ↑ Senter (2006), p. 1029–1030
  61. 1 2 3 Senter (2006), p. 1030–1031
  62. ↑ Senter (2006), p. 1032
  63. ↑ Senter (2006), p. 1030–1032
  64. ↑ Senter (2006), p. 1031
  65. ↑ Osborn (1917), p. 733–734; Glut (1997), p. 645
  66. ↑ Norman (1985), p. 39
  67. ↑ Norman (1985), p. 39; Paul (1988), p. 306; Foster (2007), p. 179; Long and Schouten (2008), p. 73
  68. ↑ Norman (1985), p. 42
  69. ↑ Lambert (1993), p. 78
  70. 1 2 Foster (2007), p. 180
  71. ↑ Foster (2007), p. 180–181
  72. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 404
  73. ↑ Witmer (1992), p. 444
  74. ↑ Paul (1988a), p. 122–123, 211
  75. ↑ Bakker (1986), p. 99, 310
  76. ↑ Chatterjee and Templin (2004), p. 277; Fastovsky and Weishampel (2005), p. 329–330; Currie (2005), p. 368
  77. 1 2 Foster (2007), p. 179

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.