Part of a series on |
Buddhism |
---|
The Decline of the Dharma or Ages of the Dharma, refers to traditional Buddhist accounts of how the Buddhist religion and the Buddha's teaching (Dharma) is believed to decline throughout history. It constitutes a key aspect of Buddhist eschatology and provides a cyclical model of history, beginning with a virtuous age where spiritual practice is very fruitful and ending with an age of strife, in which Buddhism is eventually totally forgotten. Buddhist accounts of this process culminate in the eventual arrival of a new Buddha, Maitreya.
There are various accounts of this process of Dharma decline, which begins with Shakyamuni Buddha's death and continues throughout the generations as society and its knowledge of the Buddha's teachings decline over the centuries.
There are different accounts of the decline of the Buddha's teaching (Buddha Dharma), i.e. Buddhism. These Buddhist accounts of longue durée history and temporal cosmology always assumes a cyclical pattern of virtue and decline. In degenerate times, the current Buddha's teachings fall into disregard and are forgotten. In virtuous times a new Buddha will at some point be born to teach Dharma (usually considered to be millions of years in the future). [1]
The teaching of the decline of the Dharma is found in early Buddhist sources. [2] [3] References to the decline of the Dharma over time can also be found in Mahayana sutras, including the Diamond Sutra and the Lotus Sutra .
Mahayanist and Nikaya (non-Mahayanist) sources all agree that our current time period is now on the downward slope of societal degeneration and that only after a period of strife and disaster will the cycle reverse to a period of gradual improvements. [4] Different authors and traditions offer varying accounts of the timeline of decline. [5]
One of the earliest sources which contain a Buddhist discussion of historical decline is found in the Cakkavatti-Sīhanāda Sutta (Digha Nikaya 26) of the Pāli Canon (as well as in various parallel sources in other canons, like Dīrghāgama sutra number 6). [1] The sutta recounts the story of a legendary universal monarch (cakkavatti) who lived far in the past. This king governed righteously and upheld the Dharma, ensuring peace and prosperity. Over time, successive kings neglect the Dharmic principles and fail to uphold the Dharma. They become greedy, unjust, and self-serving. Over time, societal values erode, leading to widespread poverty, crime, and moral decay. With each generation, human lifespan diminishes, reflecting the decline of moral and spiritual qualities. The sutta also describes how lifespan decreases from 80,000 years (when the wheel turning king ruled) to as little as 10 years during the peak of societal degeneration. In this bleak period, violence and lawlessness prevail, and society becomes increasingly fragmented and chaotic and people take refuge in caves to escape the fighting. [1]
The sutta then describes a turning point in history. A few individuals retreat from the chaos, renouncing violence and embracing moral conduct. Their example inspires others to change, gradually restoring societal harmony. As moral conduct improves, human lifespan begins to increase again, and the conditions for prosperity and peace are reestablished by a new wheel turning king called Sankha. Eventually, the Buddha Metteyya (Maitreya) arrives. He is the next Buddha after Shakyamuni, who will teach the Dhamma during a time of renewal. Under Metteyya’s guidance, people will again follow the path of virtue and wisdom, achieving liberation. [1]
The Vinaya (Monastic Rule) of the Theravada school (Cullavagga X, 1,6.) claims that the true Dharma will only last for 500 years. It states that the true Dharma (saddhamma) would have lasted longer (1000 years) if not for the admission of women into the monastic sangha as bhikkunis. [6] This claim also appears in the texts belonging to other Sthavira schools, including the Dharmaguptaka, Sarvastivada, and Mahisasaka schools but it does not appear in any single text surviving from the Mahasamghika school. [7] As Nattier writers "Modern scholars have generally been reluctant to accept this pronouncement as representing the words of the Buddha, finding it more reasonable to assume that it emerged in misogynist circles sometime well after the Buddha's death." [8] She also argues that since the claim is not found in any Mahasamghika works, this suggests the claim developed somewhat after the first schism. [8]
The now standard view in the Theravada school is a timetable of decline lasting five thousand years. [9] [10] [11] This schema was first taught in the works of the fifth century commentator Buddhaghosa. [12] This time table is divided into five one thousand year periods. In each period, there is the disappearance of certain elements of the Dharma: [13]
The Buddhist scholastic literature of the Abhidharma traditions provide more elaborate accounts of the various historical ages of the Dharma. The most influential such Abhidharma account in the northern tradition is found in Vasubandhu's Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. The text divides the cosmological history of the universe into four kalpas (a huge span of time), which is further divided into twenty antarakalpas (sub-eons). Each antarakalpa during the last kalpa of the universe is said to oscillate between periods of social and ethical growth and decline. [14] The zenith of goodness is a time when human beings live to be 80,000 years and during the nadir, lifespans have shrunk to 10 years. During the zenith of moral progress, there is peace and abundance, while the at the end, there is only war. This then oscillates back to a time of gradual improvement until a new Buddha arrives, and the cycle begins again. [14]
Part of a series on |
Mahāyāna Buddhism |
---|
Various Mahayana Sutras contain different accounts of the ages of the Dharma and the periods of Dharma decline. Both the Diamond Sutra and the Lotus Sutra contain mentions of a period of decline in the future, though these sutras do not provide explicit accounts of this idea. In one passage from the Diamond Sutra, Subhuti asks the Buddha if there will be any beings who will understand the teaching of the sutra "in the future time, in the latter age, in the latter period, in the latter five hundred years, when the True Dharma is in the process of decay." [15] Similarly, the Lotus Sutra also mentions a period "after the Tathagata's paranirvana, in the latter age, in the latter period, in the latter five hundred years." [15]
According to Edward Conze, the term "the last five hundred years" (paścimāyāṃ pañcaśatyām in Sanskrit) seems to assume a series of five-hundred-year periods, of which the "last five hundred years" is an age of decline. However, Nattier argues that this term was likely just referring to the five hundred years after the Buddha's final nirvana (physical death). [16]
Some sutras contain different time tables however, the Mahayana Nirvana Sutra for example, mentions a period of seven hundred years, not five hundred. The passage states: "After seven hundred years have passed since my death, the True Dharma will be broken, decayed, and brought to ruin by sinful Mara." [17] The sutra goes on to explain how even in the time of decline and decandence, the Buddhist community will continue to exist for some time, even if many monks won't be living in the traditional way. The real danger of this period, according to the Nirvana Sutra, is that many people will reject the Mahayana sutras and the eternity of the Buddha, teaching that his death was final and that he was a mere mortal. [18]
Other sutras mention a time of one thousand years. The Bhadrakalpika-sutra for example, states "The true Dharma (saddharma) will last for five hundred years, and likewise the semblace of the true Dharma (saddharma-pratirūpaka)." [19] This one thousand year timetable is also found in other sources like the Dazhidulun . [19] Still other sutras, like the Candragarbha Sutra of the Great Collection , have a timetable of 1,500 years, with the true Dharma lasting for 500 years and the age of the "semblance of the true dharma" (saddharma-pratirupaka) lasting for a thousand years. [20]
The Candragarbha Sutra (Ch: Yuezangfen 月藏分, "Moon Treasury Section") of the Mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra is a key source for the doctrine of Dharma decline. There are different editions of this text. One of these provides a different schema of five five-hundred year periods (五五百歳, Chinese: wǔ wǔ bǎi sùi; Japanese: go no gohyaku sai), each of which is less ideal for practicing Buddhism than the last. [21] [22] This schema, which covers a span of 2,500 years was also very influential in East Asian Buddhism and it was widely quoted and relied upon by Chinese and Japanese authors. [22] [23]
These five ages are: [22] [24]
The fifth and last age of decline is one in which the people would be incapable of practicing the Buddha's Dharma. Eventually the Buddhist teachings would be totally lost, leading to the need for a new Buddha to be born in the world. This time period would also be characterized by unrest, strife, famine, and natural disasters. [21]
In East Asian Buddhism, the most influential schema used to explain the decline of the Dharma is one of three ages of Dharma. This schema was formulated by Chinese authors out of the various different accounts found in the sutras and is not found in any specific Mahayana sutra in a systematic fashion. [25] These three divisions of time following Buddha's passing are: [26] [27] [28] [29] [25]
There is a passage from the Mahayana-abhisamaya-sutra (Taisho no. 839) which contains the idea of three ages used together in one passage which states: "The Tathagata manifests himself and descends from the Tusita Heaven to uphold the entire True Dharma (zhèng fǎ), the entire Semblance Dharma (xiàng fǎ), and the entire Final Dharma (mò fǎ)." [30] However, as Nattier notes, this sutra was translated after the concept of the three ages was already adopted into Chinese Buddhism, so it cannot be the main source of the idea. [30]
Nanyue Huisi (515-577), the third Patriarch of the Tiantai school, was the first Chinese author to present the three ages schema. [31] The theory first appears in his Lì Shì Yuàn Wén (立誓願文, T. 46). [32] Soon, the idea was adopted by numerous scholars. Jizang (549–622 CE), an author of the Chinese Madhyamaka school, writes in his commentary on the Lotus Sutra (Fahua yishu 法華義疏):
Generally speaking, Dharma can be divided into four periods. First is when the Buddha was in the world. Second is when the Buddha died; during this time, Dharma’s prestige did not change, so this period is called zhengfa. Third is a long time after the Buddha had died. Dharma was replaced by misconceptions, and this period is called the xiangfa Period. The fourth period is when Dharma has been distorted and only a sliver of it remains; this period is called the mofa Period. [33]
Tibetan Buddhism generally follows a four age model, similar to the Hindu concept of the four yugas. The first is a virtuous age, and the following ages progressively decline in terms of the five degenerations (kaṣāya): lifespans decrease, defilements increase, beings (physical and intellectual capacities of people decrease), times (wars and famines and other disasters increase), views (false beliefs proliferate). [34]
The four ages in this schema (which match the Hindu theory of four yugas) are: [35] [36]
Tibetan Buddhist views are also informed by the Buddhist tantric literature. The Kalacakra tantra is an influential Buddhist tantra which contains an extensive prophecy of the future decline and revival of the Dharma. [37] The view of the four eras and the idea that we are currently in the fourth degenerate era but must preserve and maintain the teachings of the kṛta-yuga was used by various Tibetan authors to promote their own tradition as upholding the kṛta teachings of the past. One example is Dolpopa, who saw himself as upholding the complete kṛta Dharma during the current degenerate age. [38]
Buddhist sources contain numerous accounts of the reasons and causes for the degeneration of the Dharma. Some of these causes are caused by external forces, such as invasions and persecution by non-buddhists. Other accounts place the blame on Buddhists, who weaken the religion from within either due to having heretical views, or due to laxity in conduct and meditation, carelessness or other moral failings. [39]
A classic passage comes from the Saṃyutta Nikāya , which states:
There are five dharmas of decline that are conducive to the corruption and disappearance of the True Dharma. Which five? It is when monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen are irreverent and unruly toward the teacher (sat-thar, i.e., the Buddha), are irreverent and unruly toward the Dharma, are irreverent and unruly toward the sangha, are irreverent and unruly toward the training (sikkha), and are irreverent and unruly toward meditational absorption (samadhi). [40]
Other passages mention quarrels and sectarian divisions within the sangha as a major element of Dharma decline, as well as the development of a false or "counterfeit" Dharma. [41]
Regarding actions of non-Buddhists, most sources mention foreign invaders and also the actions of powerful states as causes for the decline of the Dharma. [42] As to the issue of state regulation, the Humane Kings Sutra mentions that state restrictions on monastic ordinations, stupa building and the crafting of images will lead to further decline. [43]
While the teaching of the decline of the Dharma is found in all Buddhist traditions, they don't all agree on what to do about it. Different traditions interpret and respond to this teaching in various ways. Jan Nattier and Mark Blum write that there were two main types of responses to the challenge of Dharma decline: [44] [45]
The ages of Dharma is an important teaching in East Asian Mahayana. The teaching of Dharma decline became quite influential in China during the Northern Dynasties period and its influence continued well into the Sui and Tang era (618-907). The attitude that the final age was near was influenced by the persecutions of Buddhism by Emperor Taiwu and Emperor Wu, as well as news of the invasions of the Hepthalites into India and their destruction of Buddhist sites. [33]
The idea that China had entered the era of Dharma decline soon became a key teaching for several forms of early Chinese Buddhism, such as for the now defunct Three Stages school. [46] [47] Another early conservative figure was Daoxuan (596-667), who held that the best response to the era of decline was closely following the Vinaya. [48] The idea of Dharma decline or mofa also led the monk Jingwan (540–639) to begin the project of carving numerous sutras on rock. Jingwan's followers continued this project for generations, creating the Fangshan stone sutras. [33]
The teaching of Dharma decline was also important in the Lotus Sutra schools who believe that different Buddhist teachings are skillful and useful in each period due to the different capacities of the people living in different ages. Since the time of Nanyue Huisi (515-577), the idea of Dharma decline has been a part of the Tiantai school. [31]
The doctrine of Dharma decline also became central to Pure Land Buddhism. Pure land Buddhist authors held that they had entered the degenerate age, which means that the "path of sages" which relies on discipline and meditation, was no longer effective. Pure Land followers therefore attempt to attain rebirth into the pure land of Amitābha, where they can practice the Dharma more readily. [49] [50] [51] [52] [53]
The first figure to teach the Pure Land view of the age of Dharma decline was patriarch Daochuo (562–645), who writes: [54]
That is why it is stated in the Yuezang section of the Ta-chi ching (大集月藏經): ‘In our age of Dharma decline, even though countless sentient beings may cultivate the path through practice, not one will attain it.’ This age now is the era of Dharma decline, and a corrupted world of the five defilements is now manifest. The gate to the Pure Land is the only path by which people may reach [enlightenment].
Following Daochuo, other Pure Land authors like Shandao, adopted this idea, arguing that in this final age, only the Pure Land Dharma gate was efficacious, since it relied on the other-power of Buddha Amitabha's past vows. [23] Other paths relied on self-power, and thus could no longer be effective in the age of degeneration.
Saichō, the Japanese founder of Tendai (the Japanese branch of Tiantai), wrote about the idea of Dharma decline (Jp: mappō), explaining how certain Tendai teachings were well suited for this time. In particular, Saichō argued that monks should retreat to the mountains to meditate. [55] Drawing on passages in the Lotus Sutra which mention how it will be taught during the time of decline, Saichō also argued that his time (which he held was close to the arrival of the age of decline) was just the right time for the Tendai Lotus teaching. As he writes in his Shugo kokkaisho:
Now men's faculties have all changed. There is no one with Hinayana faculties. The Period of the True and of the Imitated Dharma have almost passed, and the age of mappo is extremely near. Now is the time for those with faculties suitable for the Lotus One-vehicle teaching. [56]
Saichō also argued that during this time it would become more and more difficult to keep the monastic Vinaya precepts and eventually the monastic precepts would disappear. He saw the corruption of the monks at the capital of Nara as an example of the degeneration of the Dharma. [55] As such, he focused on the bodhisattva precepts instead of on the Vinaya. [57] Saichō also criticized the state bureaucracy which controlled the Buddhist schools in Japan at the time as another contributor to Dharma decline. [58]
Other Japanese figures also adopted these idea. The Tendai scholar Genshin for example, writes in the preface to his influential Ōjōyōshū (Essentials for Birth [in the Pure Land]) how he composed the work to help common people attain birth in the pure land:
Teachings and practices in order to be born in the Pure Land are the most important things in this Final Age of defilements (jokuse matsudai 獨世末代). Who, either among monks or laymen, noblemen or commoners, is not going to follow this way? But many are the Buddhist teachings, esoteric and exoteric, which aren’t necessarily the same. Many are the practical and the theoretical ways of meditation on Buddha and on his Pure Land. Wise people, excellent people, earnest in their devotion, won’t find any difficulty to undertake these practices, but for a foolish being like myself, how is it possible to bear them? Therefore I assembled important passages from holy scriptures and Buddhist treatises elucidating the practice of nenbutsu. [59]
Genshin's writing helped popularize the idea that the world had entered the age of Dharma decline. [23] By the Kamakura Period (1185 to 1333), numerous Japanese Buddhist figures saw the strife and corruption of this historical period as a sign of the age of decline. [60] Indeed, much of Japanese Buddhism during this era is concerned with the question of how to be a Buddhist in the time of decline. [61] The Kamakura period saw the rise of the new Pure Land Buddhist schools like Jōdo-shū and Jōdo Shinshū founded by Hōnen and Shinran respectively. These new traditions stressed a total reliance on Amitabha Buddha's grace as the only possible solution to the age of decline. [61]
Hōnen's Pure Land teaching differentiates itself from its Chinese predecessors due its exclusivism. According to Hōnen, with the exception of the nembutsu (the "easy" path of simply reciting the Buddha's name), all other Buddhist practices are incapable of leading to awakening in this age. This is because the faculties of people in this age of decline are too inferior for other practices. [62] The simple practice of saying the Buddha's name meanwhile, is easy and is universally accessible to all people. [62]
Nichiren Buddhism, founded by Nichiren at around the same time, similarly uses the Dharma decline teaching in an exclusive sense to argue that only its own teaching of Lotus Sutra devotion (through the chanting of the sutra's title, the daimoku) is effective during this era. [63] [64] For Nichiren, the only solution to Dharma decline was for the imperial government to embrace the Lotus Sutra and ban all other Buddhist sects. Only when this was done would Japan become a beacon of Dharma for the world, spreading the true Dharma and reversing the age of decline throughout the whole world. [65]
In contrast to these figures, some Japanese authors like Myōe and Jōkei argued that it was precisely the abandonment of traditional buddhist practice and monastic discipline which caused the age of decline. As such, they advocated strict monastic discipline and adherence to traditional practices as a way to stem the tide of decline. [62]
The Zen schools had different attitudes to the idea, though they all promoted zazen as the main solution. Eisai (1141–1215), founder of Rinzai Zen, wrote that zazen could be practiced by all people, even those of lesser faculties. He argued that those who single mindedly practiced zazen would all attain the way, even those "ignorant people of the last age". He also wrote:
The Prajñā, Lotus and Nirvana Sutras all teach the meditational practice of zazen for the last age. If it did not suit the people’s capacity in these latter days, the Buddha would not have taught this. For this reason, the people of the great Sung [Dynasty] nation avidly practice Zen. They err, who, in ignorance of zazen, hold that Buddhism has fallen into decline. [66]
Dōgen meanwhile fully rejects the theory of Dharma decline, adamantly promoting the practice of zazen as useful at all times and writing:
The doctrinal schools emphasizing names and appearances distinguish between the True, Counterfeit, and Final Dharma ages, but in True Mahayana [Zen] we find no such distinction. It teaches that all who practice will attain the Way. [66]
As such, his teaching was in sharp contrast to other Kamakura era Buddhists who promoted the theory of decline. [67]
While the coming of the decline of Dharma and the age of strife is certainly a time which Buddhists looked upon with trepidation, the various narratives also provided some hope. This came in the shape of Buddhist savior figures which could help people through these difficult times.
Traditionally, the most important figure who is held to herald the end of the degenerate age is the future Buddha Maitreya (Pali: Metteya). [1] In both Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism, devotion to Maitreya and cultivation of meritorious actions is said to help a person be reborn in a place and time that would allow them to meet Maitreya. This could refer to Maitreya's current abode in Maitreya's inner court in Tushita heaven or to the time in the future when Maitreya arrives on earth. In Chinese Buddhism, Maitreya was also a major figure. While traditionally it is held that Maitreya's arrival is far in the future, when the Dharma has all but disappeared, some Chinese millenarian figures and sects claimed that Maitreya's arrival was immanent. [68]
Apart from Maitreya, there are also kingly figures associated with the future chakravartin king who will usher in the future golden age. In some sources, this king is named Sankha and he is seen as someone who will unite the world, rule virtuously and promote virtue. This occurs just before the descent of Maitreya. Tibetan Buddhism, influenced by the Kalacakra Tantra, has a more elaborate lore, which teaches about a future king named Kalki, who rules a virtuous Buddhist kingdom called Shambala. He is also seen as someone who will defeat non-Buddhist barbaric invaders (mlecchas) in a great war. This myth is likely borrowed from Hindu myths of the Kalki avatar. [69]
In Mahayana, certain other figures are also venerated as saviors who offer guidance, protection, and liberation during the degenerate age. One prominent savior figure is Amitābha Buddha, central to Pure Land Buddhism. Amitābha vowed to create a pure peaceful realm, Sukhāvatī, where beings could be reborn through faith in him. This provides an accessible path to liberation for all, bypassing the challenges of the degenerate age by allowing them to escape this world and be reborn in the pure land. [70] Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva is also seen as a savior figure, offering immediate assistance to those in distress and physical danger.
Kṣitigarbha (Ch: Dizang) is also known for his vow to take responsibility for the instruction of all beings in the six worlds, in the era between the death of Gautama and the rise of Maitreya. [71] [72] Various sutras which focus on Kṣitigarbha, such as the Ten Wheels Sutra, mention the bodhisattva Dizang in connection to the era of Dharma decline. The Ten Wheels Sutra (T. 410) hails Dizang as a savior of the "vile age of the five turbulences [in] the world without a Buddha". [71] This scripture was central to the Three Stages Sect in China. [73]
In the Lotus Sutra , Viśiṣṭacāritra is entrusted to spread Buddhist dharma in the age of Dharma decline and save mankind and the earth. He and countless other bodhisattvas , specifically called Bodhisattvas of the Earth (of which he is the leader), vow to be reborn in a latter day to re-create Buddhist dharma, thus turning the degenerate age into a flourishing paradise. Gautama Buddha entrusts them instead of his more commonly known major disciples with this task since the Bodhisattvas of the Earth have had a karmic connection with Gautama Buddha since the beginning of time, meaning that they are aware of the Superior Practice which is the essence of Buddhism or the Dharma in its original, pure form.
Some Chinese folk religions borrow the idea of the final age of Dharma from Buddhism. Some Chinese religions even teach that the three ages were associated with Buddhist figures like Dīpankara Buddha, Gautama Buddha, and Maitreya. [74] [75] Chinese salvationist religions are particularly focused on this idea, and they often promote themselves as teachings which are just right for the current age of decline since they can provide a path to salvation.
In Buddhism, a bodhisattva or bodhisatva is a person who is on the path towards bodhi ('awakening') or Buddhahood.
Amitābha, also known as Amita Buddha or Amida Buddha, is the principal Buddha of Pure Land Buddhism. He is also known as Amitāyus, which is understood to be his enjoyment body (Saṃbhogakāya). In Vajrayana Buddhism, Amitābha is known for his longevity, discernment, pure perception, and the purification of aggregates with deep awareness of the emptiness of all phenomena. Amitābha is associated with the Diamond Realm (vajradhātu), whereas Amitāyus is associated with the Womb Realm (garbhakoṣadhātu).
In Buddhism, Buddha is a title for those who are spiritually awake or enlightened, and have thus attained the supreme goal of Buddhism, variously described as nirvana, bodhi, and liberation. A Buddha is also someone who fully understands the Dharma, the true nature of all things or phenomena (dharmas), the ultimate truth. Buddhahood is the condition and state of a buddha. This highest spiritual state of being is also termed sammā-sambodhi and is interpreted in many different ways across schools of Buddhism.
Pure Land Buddhism or the Pure Land School is a broad branch of Mahayana Buddhism focused on achieving rebirth in a Pure Land. It is one of the most widely practiced traditions of Buddhism in East Asia. It is also known as "Nembutsu school" or the "Lotus School". East Asian Pure Land mainly relies on three main Mahayana scriptures: the Sutra of Amitayus, the Contemplation Sutra and the Amitabha Sutra.
Maitreya (Sanskrit) or Metteyya (Pali), is a bodhisattva who is regarded as the future Buddha of this world in all schools of Buddhism, prophesied to become Maitreya Buddha or Metteyya Buddha. In some Buddhist literature, such as the Amitabha Sutra and the Lotus Sutra, he is also referred to as Ajitā. In Tibetan Buddhism he is known as the "Lord of Love" or the "Noble Loving One". The root of his name is the Sanskrit word maitrī. The name Maitreya is also related to the Indo-Iranian name Mitra. In Hinduism, Maitreya is prophesied to be the king of Shambala, which is also the birthplace of the Kalki Avatar.
Tiantai or T'ien-t'ai is an East Asian Buddhist school of Mahāyāna Buddhism that developed in 6th-century China. Tiantai Buddhism emphasizes the "One Vehicle" (Ekayāna) doctrine derived from the Lotus Sūtra as well as Mādhyamaka philosophy, particularly as articulated in the works of the 4th patriarch Zhiyi. Brook Ziporyn, professor of ancient and medieval Chinese religion and philosophy, states that Tiantai Buddhism is "the earliest attempt at a thoroughgoing Sinitic reworking of the Indian Buddhist tradition." According to Paul Swanson, scholar of Buddhist studies, Tiantai Buddhism grew to become "one of the most influential Buddhist traditions in China and Japan."
Tendai, also known as the Tendai Lotus School, is a Mahāyāna Buddhist tradition with significant esoteric elements that was officially established in Japan in 806 by the Japanese monk Saichō. The Tendai school, which has been based on Mount Hiei since its inception, rose to prominence during the Heian period (794–1185). It gradually eclipsed the powerful Hossō school and competed with the rival Shingon school to become the most influential sect at the Imperial court.
East Asian Yogācāra refers to the Mahayana Buddhist traditions in East Asia which developed out of the Indian Buddhist Yogācāra systems. In East Asian Buddhism, this school of Buddhist idealism was known as the "Consciousness-Only school".
The Mahāyāna sūtras are a broad genre of Buddhist scripture (sūtra) that are accepted as canonical and as buddhavacana in certain communities of Mahāyāna Buddhism. They are largely preserved in Sanskrit manuscripts, and translations in the Tibetan Buddhist canon and Chinese Buddhist canon. Several hundred Mahāyāna sūtras survive in Sanskrit, or in Chinese and Tibetan translations. They are also sometimes called Vaipulya ("extensive") sūtras by earlier sources. The Buddhist scholar Asaṅga classified the Mahāyāna sūtras as part of the Bodhisattva Piṭaka, a collection of texts meant for bodhisattvas.
The Lotus Sūtra is one of the most influential and venerated Buddhist Mahāyāna sūtras. It is the main scripture on which the Tiantai along with its derivative schools, the Japanese Tendai and Nichiren, Korean Cheontae, and Vietnamese Thiên Thai schools of Buddhism were established. It is also influential for other East Asian Buddhist schools, such as Zen. According to the British Buddhologist Paul Williams, "For many Buddhists in East Asia since early times, the Lotus Sūtra contains the final teaching of Shakyamuni Buddha—complete and sufficient for salvation." The American Buddhologist Donald S. Lopez Jr. writes that the Lotus Sūtra "is arguably the most famous of all Buddhist texts," presenting "a radical re-vision of both the Buddhist path and of the person of the Buddha."
The Nianfo, alternatively in Japanese as 念仏, Korean: 염불; RR: yeombul, or in Vietnamese: niệm Phật, is a Buddhist practice central to the East Asian Buddhism. The Chinese term nianfo is a translation of Sanskrit buddhānusmṛti, which is a classic Buddhist mindfulness (smṛti) practice.
Buddhism includes a wide array of divine beings that are venerated in various ritual and popular contexts. Initially they included mainly Indian figures such as devas, asuras and yakshas, but later came to include other Asian spirits and local gods. They range from enlightened Buddhas to regional spirits adopted by Buddhists or practiced on the margins of the religion.
Buddhist eschatology, like many facets of modern Buddhist practice and belief, came into existence during its development in China, and, through the blending of Buddhist cosmological understanding and Daoist eschatological views, created a complex canon of apocalyptic beliefs. These beliefs, although not entirely part of orthodox Buddhism, form an important collection of Chinese Buddhist traditions which bridge the gap between the monastic order and local beliefs of Imperial China.
The Bodhisattva vow is a vow taken by some Mahāyāna Buddhists to achieve full buddhahood for the sake of all sentient beings. One who has taken the vow is nominally known as a bodhisattva. This can be done by venerating all Buddhas and by cultivating supreme moral and spiritual perfection, to be placed in the service of others. In particular, bodhisattvas promise to practice the six perfections of giving, moral discipline, patience, effort, concentration and wisdom in order to fulfill their bodhicitta aim of attaining buddhahood for the sake of all beings.
The Bodhisattva Precepts are a set of ethical trainings (śīla) used in Mahāyāna Buddhism to advance a practitioner along the path to becoming a bodhisattva. These sets of "restrains" (saṃvāra) are the main ethical code in Mahāyāna Buddhism and as thus also sometimes called "Mahāyāna precepts".
Pure Land is a Mahayana Buddhist concept referring to a transcendent realm emanated by a buddha or bodhisattva which has been purified by their activity and sustaining power. Pure lands are said to be places without the sufferings of samsara and to be beyond the three planes of existence. Many Mahayana Buddhists aspire to be reborn in a Buddha's pure land after death.
In Buddhism, faith refers to a serene commitment to the practice of the Buddha's teaching, and to trust in enlightened or highly developed beings, such as Buddhas or bodhisattvas. Buddhists usually recognize multiple objects of faith, but many are especially devoted to one in particular, such as one particular Buddha. Faith may not only be devotion to a person, but exists in relation to Buddhist concepts like the efficacy of karma and the possibility of enlightenment.
Jōkei (貞慶) (1155–1213) was an influential Buddhist scholar-monk and reformer of the East Asian Yogācāra sect in Japan, posthumously known as Gedatsu shōnin.
Mahāyāna is a term for a broad group of Buddhist traditions, texts, philosophies, and practices developed in ancient India. It is considered one of the three main existing branches of Buddhism, the others being Theravāda and Vajrayāna. Mahāyāna accepts the main scriptures and teachings of early Buddhism but also recognizes various doctrines and texts that are not accepted by Theravada Buddhism as original. These include the Mahāyāna sūtras and their emphasis on the bodhisattva path and Prajñāpāramitā. Vajrayāna or Mantra traditions are a subset of Mahāyāna which makes use of numerous tantric methods Vajrayānists consider to help achieve Buddhahood.
pp 25-26:Many of the Burmese Buddhists I spoke with referenced a five thousand year period of decline noting that the current sāsana of the Buddha Sakyamuni who lived in India during the 5th century BCE, is already half way towards its complete disintegration. As time passes after the death of a Buddha, the sāsana becomes increasingly opaque until it finally disappears. There may be a period with no Buddha, and then a future Buddha descends from the celestial abodes, is born, and restores the sāsana on earth once again. Burmese Buddhist historian, Alicia Turner, has identified multiple chronologies for the decline of the sāsana that range from one hundred to five thousand years (2014). In the time of decay, also known as the Kaliyuga, all traces of the Tipitaka and their supporting practices eventually vanish destabilizing the sāsana and triggering its dissolution. pp 32-33:The Angata vamsa (dating to roughly 13th century) specifically depicts five stages in the decline of the sāsana. The first stage articulates the loss of the ability for monks to reach the four stages of enlightenment: sotapanna (stream-enterer), sakadagami (once-returner), anagami (non-returner), and arahant (fully awakened). The second stage relates the loss of patipatti (practice). In this stage, monks lose the ability to meditate and maintain their precepts. The loss of pariyatti (textual study) is the third stage and depicts the disappearance of the Tipitaka. The fourth stage illustrates the loss of maintaining even appearances of piousness i.e. respectful speech, attire, work, and morals. In this stage, monks no longer behave as monks. They are illustrated as married and working people. The final stage illustrates the disappearance of the Buddha's relics as they are returned to the location of the Buddha's enlightenment and engulfed in flames (ibid.)
cf Note 1747- And this expression 'a thousand years' is said with reference to arahants who have attained the analytic knowledges. Following this, for another thousand years, there appear dry-insight arahants; for another thousand years, non-returners; for another thousand years, once-returners; for another thousand years, stream-enterers. Thus the good Dhamma of penetration will last five thousand years. The Dhamma of learning will also last this long. For without learning, there is no penetration, and as long as there is learning, there is penetration.