Fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France

Last updated
Grand Royal Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of France Grand Royal Coat of Arms of France.svg
Grand Royal Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of France

The fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France were a set of unwritten principles which dealt with determining the question of royal succession, and placed limits on the otherwise absolute power of the king from the Middle Ages until the French Revolution in 1789. They were based on customary usage and religious beliefs about the roles of God, monarch, and subjects.

Contents

Terminology

Although discussion of the concepts surrounding the idea of fundamental laws which organize the body politic go back to the earliest period of the French monarchy, the expression "fundamental laws" (lois fondamentales) itself didn't come into use until the second half of the 16th century, even though the theories underlying it were fully mature by that point. [1]

The Parliament of Paris as late as 1788 listed a number of rights that it considered fundamental, including that of the ruling house to the throne of France, but also those of the ordinary citizen to never be brought for any matter before judges other than those designated by law, and never to be arrested without being brought before a competent legal authority. [2] [lower-alpha 1]

Salic law

Early writers in the 9th to the 16th century, such as Smaragdus of Saint-Mihiel, Jonas of Orléans and Hincmar of Reims, saw the king as the embodiment of divine justice, from which he drew his authority. [3]

Salic law was the ancient Frankish civil law code compiled around 500 AD by the first Frankish King, Clovis. Roman Law was written with the assistance of Gallo-Romans to reflect the Salic legal tradition and Christianity, while containing much from the Roman tradition. The text lists various crimes and the fines associated with them. [4] It remained the basis of Frankish law throughout the early Medieval period, and influenced future European legal systems.

The best known tenet of Salic law was the exclusion of women from inheriting thrones, fiefs, or other property. The Salic laws were arbitrated by a committee appointed and empowered by the King of the Franks. Dozens of manuscripts dating from the sixth to eighth centuries and three emendations as late as the ninth century have survived. [5] Its use of agnatic succession governed royal succession in the kingdoms of France and Italy.[ citation needed ]

Religious limits to power

The absolute monarchy in the kingdom was not the same as totalitarian dictatorship, and there were limits on the king's power. These arose chiefly from religious constraints: because the monarchy was considered to be established by divine right, that is, that the king was chosen by God to carry out his will, this implied that the king's subjects should obey and respect him. The king is accountable only to God, however he doesn't have despotic power. There are limits imposed by the Gospels, and the king does not have the right of life and death over his subjects, and has a duty to be virtuous. [6]

Key themes

While ancient France did not have a constitution in the formal sense (written document containing constitutional rules), it had already developed a constitution in the material sense (organization of power) in the Middle Ages.

The fundamental laws can be grouped into four key themes: [7]

In addition, there was also:

Evolution and demise

Towards the end of the Middle Ages, the monarchy was evolving in the direction of absolutism, placing the king above the law, according to the political ideas of Jean Bodin and his " Six Books of the Republic " of 1576. This implied that with regard to governmental powers, the king makes the laws, the king executes the laws through his ministers and officers, and the king delegates his judiciary power to independent magistrates who handle appeals; nevertheless, the king retains the right to detain anyone of his choice by a lettre de cachet . [6]

Despite this evolution and Bodin's theories, the power of the king remained strictly controlled by traditional institutions, like parliaments, and provincial, parish, and clergy groups, and local customs. Thus, for example, when Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685, he was acting in response to his entourage, his court, and influential men in the kingdom. The absolute monarchy came to an end in 1789 with the French Revolution. [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John I of France</span> King of France in 1316

John I, called the Posthumous, was King of France and Navarre, as the posthumous son and successor of Louis X, for the four days he lived in 1316. He is the youngest person to be king of France, the only one to have borne that title from birth, and the only one to hold the title for his entire life. His reign is the shortest of any undisputed French king. Although considered a king today, his status was not recognized until chroniclers and historians in later centuries began numbering John II, thereby acknowledging John I's brief reign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bertrada of Laon</span> Queen consort of the Franks (died 783)

Bertrada of Laon, also known as Bertrada the Younger or Bertha Broadfoot, was a Frankish queen. She was the wife of Pepin the Short and the mother of Charlemagne, Carloman and Gisela, plus five other children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roland Mousnier</span> French historian (1907-1993)

Roland Émile Mousnier was a French historian of the early modern period in France and of the comparative studies of different civilizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sami Aldeeb</span> Palestinian-born Swiss lawyer

Sami Awad Aldeeb Abu-Sahlieh is a Swiss Palestinian lawyer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">18th-century French literature</span> Literature-related events in France during the 18th century

18th-century French literature is French literature written between 1715, the year of the death of King Louis XIV of France, and 1798, the year of the coup d'État of Bonaparte which brought the Consulate to power, concluded the French Revolution, and began the modern era of French history. This century of enormous economic, social, intellectual and political transformation produced two important literary and philosophical movements: during what became known as the Age of Enlightenment, the Philosophes questioned all existing institutions, including the church and state, and applied rationalism and scientific analysis to society; and a very different movement, which emerged in reaction to the first movement; the beginnings of Romanticism, which exalted the role of emotion in art and life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kingdom of France</span> Kingdom in Western Europe (987–1848)

The Kingdom of France is the historiographical name or umbrella term given to various political entities of France in the medieval and early modern period. It was one of the most powerful states in Europe since the High Middle Ages. It was also an early colonial power, with colonies in Asia and Africa, and the largest being New France in North America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">François-André Isambert</span> French lawyer, historian, and politician

François-André Isambert was a French lawyer, historian, and politician. Isambert was founder and for an extended period contributor of the Gazette des Tribunaux and actively participated in Louis François Wolowski's Revue de législation et de jurisprudence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of France</span>

French law has a dual jurisdictional system comprising private law, also known as judicial law, and public law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old French law</span>

Old French law, referred to in French as l'Ancien Droit, was the law of the Kingdom of France until the French Revolution. In the north of France were the Pays de coutumes, where customary laws were in force, while in the south were the Pays de droit écrit, where Roman law had remained paramount. Roughly speaking, the line separating the two areas was the river Loire, from Geneva to the mouth of the Charente, although this was not a firm border between the two categories of law. As worded by George Mousourakis, "in both zones, the law in force also included elements derived from royal, feudal, and canonical sources."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Claude de Seyssel</span>

Claude de Seyssel was a Savoyard jurist and humanist, now known for his political writings. He wrote La Grande Monarchie de France as a supporter of the French crown, in the person of Louis XII. Written around 1515, in French, it was published 1519; it supports hereditary monarchy. A Latin translation De Republica Galliae was printed in 1548 in Strasbourg.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maison militaire du roi de France</span> Military branch of the French royal household

The maison militaire du roi de France, in English the military household of the king of France, was the military part of the French royal household or Maison du Roi under the Ancien Régime. The term only appeared in 1671, though such a gathering of units pre-dates this. Like the rest of the royal household, the military household was under the authority of the Secretary of State for the Maison du Roi. Still, it depended on the ordinaire des guerres for its budget. Under Louis XIV, these two officers of state were given joint command of the military household.

Alfred Daviel was a French lawyer and politician who was appointed Minister of Justice in the last cabinet of the French Second Republic.

Philippe Malaurie was a French professor of private law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcel Planiol</span>

Marcel Planiol was a French professor of law at the University of Rennes, then at the Sorbonne. He wrote on the law and on historical Brittany. He is known for his Elementary Treatise of Civil Law (1901), which attempted to explain French civil law in terms of elementary principles, particularly the maxims of Roman law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul-Alexis Mellet</span>

Paul-Alexis Mellet is a French early modern historian and expert in the political and religious ideas from early modernity. He is a professor at the University of Geneva and a member of the Institute of Reformation History. Formerly, he was a professor at the University of Cergy-Pontoise, and at the University of Tours.

Nicolas Warembourg is a French jurist, professor of Law at the Sorbonne.

Charles-Léon Lyon-Caen was a French jurist.

Catherine Duprat, is a French historian specializing in the French Revolution and philanthropy. She is a professor at the Paris I Pantheon-Sorbonne University,

In France, the fundamental principles recognized by the laws of the Republic are certain principles recognized by the Constitutional Council and the Council of State as having constitutional force.

Frédéric Bluche was a French legal historian who specialized in the French Revolution and the First Empire.

References

Notes
  1. "The right of every citizen never to be brought before any judge other than his natural judges, who are those designated by law; And the right, without which all the others are useless, of not being arrested, by any order whatsoever, except to be handed over without delay into the hands of judges of appropriate jurisdiction."
    "Le droit de chaque citoyen de n'être jamais traduit en aucune matière devant d'autres juges que ses juges naturels, qui sont ceux que la loi lui désigne ; Et le droit, sans lequel tous les autres sont inutiles, celui de n'être arrêté, par quelque ordre que ce soit, que pour être remis sans délai entre les mains des juges compétents."(Maury 1998.)
  2. In law, a custom is a usage held to be obligatory by the social order, as if it were the result of a law. It is formed by the accumulation of precedents.
    Citations
    1. Lemaire 1907, p. iii.
    2. Maury 1998.
    3. Les lois fondamentales de la monarchie française d'après les théories de l'ancien régime, by André Lemaire, Aubert Félix, Bibliothèque de l'École des chartes, 1908 69 pp. 663, via Persée
    4. Geary, Patrick (2003). Readings in Medieval History:Rome Law. Canada: Broadview Press Ltd. pp. 129–136.
    5. Drew 1991, p. 53.
    6. 1 2 3 4 Dignat 2021.
    7. 1 2 Bouscau 2011.

    Works cited

    Further reading

    Modern
    Historical