Polyethnicity

Last updated
Polyethnicity in New York City NewYorkStreetScene-People.JPG
Polyethnicity in New York City

Polyethnicity, also known as pluri-ethnicity or multi-ethnicity, refers to specific cultural phenomena that are characterized by social proximity and mutual interaction of people from different ethnic backgrounds, within a country or other specific geographic region. [1]

Contents

Same terms may also relate to the ability and willingness of individuals to identify themselves with multiple ethnicities. It occurs when multiple ethnicities inhabit a given area, specifically through means of immigration, intermarriage, trade, conquest and post-war land-divisions. [2] [3] [4] This has had many political and social implications on countries and regions. [5] [6]

Many, if not all, countries have some degree of polyethnicity, with countries like Nigeria and Canada having high levels and countries like Japan and Poland having very low levels (and more specifically, a sense of homogeneity). [7] [8] [9] [10] The amount of polyethnicity prevalent in some Western countries has spurred some arguments against it, which include a belief that it leads to the weakening of each society's strengths, and also a belief that political-ethnic issues in countries with polyethnic populations are better handled with different laws for certain ethnicities. [11] [12]

Conceptual history

In 1985, Canadian historian William H. McNeill gave a series of three lectures on polyethnicity in ancient and modern cultures at the University of Toronto. [13] The main thesis throughout his lectures was the argument that it has been the cultural norm for societies to be composed of different ethnic groups. McNeill argued that the ideal of homogeneous societies may have grown between 1750 and 1920 in Western Europe because of the growth in the belief in a single nationalistic base for the political organization of society. McNeill believed that during World War I, the desire for homogeneous nations began to weaken. [14]

Impact on politics

Polyethnicity divides nations, complicating the politics as local and national governments attempt to satisfy all ethnic groups. [5] Many politicians in countries attempt to find the balance between ethnic identities within their country and the identity of the nation as a whole. [5] Nationalism also plays a large part in these political debates, as cultural pluralism and consociationalism are the democratic alternatives to nationalism for the polyethnic state. [15]

The idea of nationalism being social instead of ethnic entails a variety of culture, a shared sense of identity and a community not based on descent. [16] Culturally-plural states vary constitutionally between a decentralized and unitary state (such as the United Kingdom) and a federal state (such as Belgium, Switzerland, and Canada). [17] Ethnic parties in these polyethnic regions are not anti-state but instead seek maximum power within this state. [11] [16] Many polyethnic countries face that dilemma with their policy decisions. [18] The following nations and regions are just a few specific examples of this dilemma and its effects:

United States

U.S. languages (2006) [7]
English (only)224.2 million
Spanish, incl. Creole 34.0 million
Chinese 2.5 million
French, incl. Creole 2.0 million
Tagalog 1.4 million
Vietnamese 1.2 million
German 1.1 million
Korean 1.1 million

The United States is a nation founded by different ethnicities frequently described as coming together in a "melting pot," a term used to emphasize the degree to which constituent groups influence and are influenced by each other, or a "salad bowl," a term more recently coined in contrast to the "melting pot" metaphor and emphasizing those groups' retention of fundamentally distinct identities despite their proximity to each other and their influence on the overall culture that all of those groups inhabit. [19]

A controversial political issue in recent years has been the question of bilingualism. [20] Many immigrants have come from Hispanic America, who are native Spanish speakers, in the past centuries and have become a significant minority and even a majority in many areas of the Southwest. [7] [21] In New Mexico the Spanish speaking population exceeds 40%. [7] [22] Disputes have emerged over language policy, since a sizeable part of the population, and in many areas the majority of the population, speak Spanish as a native language. [20]

The biggest debates are over bilingual education for language minority students, the availability of non-English ballots and election materials and whether or not English is the official language. [20] [23] [24] It has evolved into an ethnic conflict between the pluralists who support bilingualism and linguistic access and the assimilationists who strongly oppose this and lead the official English movement. [25] The United States does not have an official language, but English is the de facto national language and is spoken by the overwhelming majority of the country's population. [26]

Canada

Canada has had many political debates between the French speakers and English speakers, particularly in the province of Quebec. [27] Canada holds both French and English as official languages. [28] The politics in Quebec are largely defined by nationalism as French Québécois wish to gain independence from Canada as a whole, based on ethnic and linguistic boundaries. [29] The main separatist party, Parti Québécois, attempted to gain sovereignty twice (once in 1980 and again in 1995) and failed by a narrow margin of 1.2% in 1995. [30] Since then, in order to remain united, Canada granted Quebec statut particulier, recognizing Quebec as a nation within the united nation of Canada. [31]

Belgium

The divide between the Dutch-speaking north (Flanders) and the French-speaking South (Wallonia) has caused the parliamentary democracy to become ethnically polarized. [32] Though an equal number of seats in the Chamber of Representatives are prescribed to the Flemish and Walloons, Belgian political parties have all divided into two ideologically identical but linguistically and ethnically different parties. [32] The political crisis has grown so bad in recent years that the partition of Belgium has been feared. [33]

Ethiopia

Ethiopia is a polyethnic nation consisting of 80 different ethnic groups and 84 indigenous languages. [34] [35] The diverse population and the rural areas throughout the nation made it nearly impossible to create a strong centralized state, but it was eventually accomplished through political evolution. [36] Prior to 1974, nationalism was discussed only within radical student groups, but by the late 20th century, the issue had come to the forefront of political debate. [37] [38]

Ethiopia was forced to modernize their political system to properly handle nationalism debates. [38] The Derg military government took control with a Marxist–Leninist ideology, urging self-determination and rejecting compromise over any nationality issues. [39] In the 1980s, Ethiopia suffered a series of famines and, after the Soviet Union broke apart, lost its aid from the Soviets; the Derg government later collapsed. [39] Eventually, Ethiopia restabilized and adopted a modern political system that models a federal parliamentary republic. [40]

It was still impossible to create a central government holding all power and so the central government was torn. [41] It now presides over ethnically-based regional states, and each ethnic state is granted the right to establish its own government with democracy. [42]

Spain

In Spain from 1808 to 1814, the Spanish War of Independence took place in a multicultural Spain. [43] Spain, at the time, was then under the control of King Joseph Bonaparte, who was Napoleon Bonaparte's brother. [43] Because they were under the control of French rule, the Spanish formed coalitions of ethnic groups to reclaim their own political representation to replace the French political system, which had lost power. [43]

Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia countries, 2009-10-10 Location Southeast Asia.svg
Southeast Asia countries, 2009-10-10

In Southeast Asia the continental area (Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam) generally practices Theravada or Mahayana Buddhism. [44] Most of insular Southeast Asia (namely Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia) practices mostly Sunni Islam. [45] The rest of the insular region (Philippines and East Timor) practices mostly Roman Catholic Christianity and Singapore practises mostly Mahayana Buddhism. [45]

Significant long-distance labor migration that occurred during the late 19th century and the early 20th century provided many different types of ethnic diversity. [46] Relations between the indigenous population of the region arose from regional variations of cultural and linguistic groups. [46] Immigrant minorities, especially the Chinese, then developed as well. [46] Although there were extreme political differences for each minority and religion, they were still legitimate members of political communities, and there has been a significant amount of unity throughout history. [47] This differs from both nearby East and South Asia. [47]

Impact on society

Polyethnicity, over time, can change the way societies practice cultural norms. [6]

Marriage

An increase in intermarriage in the United States has led to the blurring of ethnic lines. [2] Anti-miscegenation laws (laws banning interracial marriages) were abolished in the United States in 1967 and now it is estimated that one-fifth of the population in the United States by 2050 will be part of the polyethnic population. [48] In 2000, self-identified Multiracial Americans numbered 6.8 million or 2.4% of the population. [7] [49]

While the number of interethnic marriages is on the rise, there are certain ethnic groups that have been found more likely to become polyethnic and recognize themselves with more than one ethnic background. Bhavani Arabandi states in his article on polyethnicity that:

Asians and Latinos have much higher rates of interethnic marriages than do blacks, and they are more likely to report polyethnicity than blacks who more often claim a single ethnicity and racial identity. This is the case, the authors [Lee, J & Bean, F.D] argue, because blacks have a "legacy of slavery," a history of discrimination, and have been victimized by the "one-drop rule" (where having any black blood automatically labeled one as black) in the US. [2]

Military

Maj. Gen. William B. Garrett III, commander of U.S. Army Africa, Gen. Nyakayirima Aronda, Chief of Defense Forces, Ugandan People's Defense Force and Gen. Jeremiah Kianga, Chief of General Staff, Kenya, render honors during the opening ceremony for Natural Fire 10, Kitgum, Uganda, Oct. 16, 2009. US ARMY AFRICA NF10 0016.jpg
Maj. Gen. William B. Garrett III, commander of U.S. Army Africa, Gen. Nyakayirima Aronda, Chief of Defense Forces, Ugandan People's Defense Force and Gen. Jeremiah Kianga, Chief of General Staff, Kenya, render honors during the opening ceremony for Natural Fire 10, Kitgum, Uganda, Oct. 16, 2009.

Presently, most armed forces are composed of people from different ethnic backgrounds. [14] They are considered to be polyethnic due to the differences in race, ethnicity, language or background. [50] While there are many examples of polyethnic forces, the most prominent are among the largest armed forces in the world, including those of the United States, the former Soviet Union, and China. [14] Polyethnic armed forces are not a new phenomenon since multi-ethnic forces existed during the Roman Empire, the Middle Eastern Empires, and even the Mongol Khans. [50] The US military was one of the first modern militaries to begin ethnic integration, by order of President Harry Truman in 1945. [51]

Criticisms

There are also arguments against polyethnicity, as well as the assimilation of ethnicities in polyethnic regions. Wilmot Robertson in The Ethnostate and Dennis L. Thomson in The Political Demands of Isolated Indian Bands in British Columbia, argue for some level of separatism. [11] [12]

In The Ethnostate, Robertson declares polyethnicity as an ideal that only lessens each culture. [11] He believes that, within a polyethnic culture, the nation or region as a whole is less capable of cultural culmination than each of the individual ethnicities that make it up. [52] Essentially, polyethnicity promotes the dilution of ethnicity and thus hinders each ethnicity in all aspects of culture. [52]

In The Political Demands of Isolated Indian Bands in British Columbia, Thomson points out the benefits in some level (albeit small) of separatist policies. [12] He argues the benefits of allowing ethnic groups, like the Amish and the Hutterites in the United States and Canada or the Sami in Norway, to live on the edges of governance. [12] These are ethnic groups that would prefer to retain their ethnic identity and thus prefer separatist policies for themselves, as they do not require them to conform to policies for all ethnicities of the nation. [12]

See also

Notes

  1. McNeil 1985, pages 85
  2. 1 2 3 Arabandi 2000, Online
  3. Smith 1998, page 190
  4. Smith 1998, page 200
  5. 1 2 3 Safran 2000, Introduction
  6. 1 2 Benhabib 1996, pages 154–155
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 U.S. Census Bureau
  8. Thomson 2000, pages 213-215
  9. Burgess 2007, Online
  10. Safran 2000, pages 1-2
  11. 1 2 3 4 Robertson 1992, pages 1-10
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Thomson 2000, pages 214–215
  13. Ritzer 2004, page 141
  14. 1 2 3 Dreisziger 1990, pages 1-2
  15. Kellas 1991, page 8
  16. 1 2 Kellas 1991, page 65
  17. Kellas 1991, pages 180-183
  18. Safran 2000, pages 2-3
  19. Adams 2001 [ page needed ]
  20. 1 2 3 Navarrette 2007, online
  21. Hakimzadeh 2007, Online
  22. Crawford 1992, page 154
  23. Cromwell 1998, Online
  24. Roache 1996, Online
  25. Young 1993, page 73
  26. McArthur 1998, page 38
  27. Bélanger 2000, online
  28. Tuohy 1992, page 325
  29. McNeil 1985, page 86
  30. Leyton-Brown 2002, page 5
  31. The Calgary Declaration
  32. 1 2 Lijphart 199, page 39
  33. Bryant, Online
  34. Levinson 1998, page 131
  35. Grimes 1996
  36. Young 1993, page 147
  37. Tiruneh 1993, page 150
  38. 1 2 Young 1993, page 149
  39. 1 2 Young 1993, page 152
  40. Kavalski 2008, page 31
  41. Young 1993, page 159
  42. Young 1993, page 209
  43. 1 2 3 Baramendi 2000, pages 80-84
  44. Hirschman 1995 page 19
  45. 1 2 Hirschman 1995 page 20
  46. 1 2 3 Hirschman 1995 page 21
  47. 1 2 Hirschman 1995 page 22
  48. Lee 2000, pages 221-245
  49. Jones & Smith 2000 Online
  50. 1 2 Dreisziger 1990 page 1
  51. Yang 2000, page 168
  52. 1 2 Robertson 1992 p. 10

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nation state</span> Political term for a state that is based around a nation

A nation-state is a political unit where the state, a centralized political organization ruling over a population within a territory, and the nation, a community based on a common identity, are congruent. It is a more precise concept than "country", since a country does not need to have a predominant national or ethnic group.

A nation is a type of social organization where a collective identity, a national identity, has emerged from a combination of shared features across a given population, such as language, history, ethnicity, culture, territory or society. Some nations are constructed around ethnicity while others are bound by political constitutions.

An ethnicity or ethnic group is a group of people who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. Those attributes can include a people of a common language, culture, common sets of ancestry, traditions, society, religion, history, or social treatment. The term ethnicity is sometimes used interchangeably with the term nation, particularly in cases of ethnic nationalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hyphenated American</span> Term used in American politics and sociology

In the United States, the term hyphenated American refers to the use of a hyphen between the name of an ethnicity and the word American in compound nouns, e.g., as in Irish-American. Calling a person a "hyphenated American" was used as an insult alleging divided political or national loyalties, especially in times of war. It was used from 1890 to 1920 to disparage Americans who were of foreign birth or ancestry and who displayed an affection for their ancestral heritage language and culture. It was most commonly used during World War I against Americans from White ethnic backgrounds who favored United States neutrality during the ongoing conflict or who opposed the idea of an American military alliance with the British Empire and the creation of what is now called the "Special Relationship", even for purely political reasons.

The term "minority group" has different usages, depending on the context. According to its common usage, the term minority group can simply be understood in terms of demographic sizes within a population: i.e. a group in society with the least number of individuals, or less than half, is a "minority". Usually a minority group is disempowered relative to the majority, and that characteristic lends itself to different applications of the term minority.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forced assimilation</span> Involuntary cultural assimilation of minority groups

Forced assimilation is the involuntary cultural assimilation of religious or ethnic minority groups, during which they are forced by a government to adopt the language, national identity, norms, mores, customs, traditions, values, mentality, perceptions, way of life, and often the religion and ideology of an established and generally larger community belonging to a dominant culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National identity</span> Identity or sense of belonging to one state or one nation

National identity is a person's identity or sense of belonging to one or more states or one or more nations. It is the sense of "a nation as a cohesive whole, as represented by distinctive traditions, culture, and language".

A stateless nation is an ethnic group or nation that does not possess its own sovereign state. Use of the term implies that such ethnic groups has the right to self-determination, to establish an independent nation-state with its own government. Members of stateless nations may be citizens of the country in which they live, or they may be denied citizenship by that country. Stateless nations are usually not represented in international sports or in international organisations such as the United Nations. Nations without a state are classified as fourth-world nations. Some stateless nations have a history of statehood, while some were always stateless.

Ethnogenesis is the formation and development of an ethnic group. This can originate by group self-identification or by outside identification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian identity</span>

Canadian identity refers to the unique culture, characteristics and condition of being Canadian, as well as the many symbols and expressions that set Canada and Canadians apart from other peoples and cultures of the world. Primary influences on the Canadian identity trace back to the arrival, beginning in the early seventeenth century, of French settlers in Acadia and the St. Lawrence River Valley, and of English, Scottish and Irish settlers in Newfoundland and the Maritimes, the British conquest of New France in 1763, the migration of United Empire Loyalists to Upper Canada and New Brunswick, and the ensuing dominance of French and British culture in the gradual development of both an imperial and national identity.

Civic nationalism, otherwise known as democratic nationalism, is a form of nationalism that adheres to traditional liberal values of freedom, tolerance, equality, and individual rights, and is not based on ethnocentrism. Civic nationalists often defend the value of national identity by saying that individuals need it as a partial shared aspect of their identity in order to lead meaningful, autonomous lives and that democratic polities need a national identity to function properly. Liberal nationalism is used in the same sense as 'civic nationalism', but liberal ethnic nationalism also exists, and "state nationalism" is a branch of civic nationalism, but it can also be illiberal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macedonian diaspora</span>

The Macedonian diaspora consists of ethnic Macedonian emigrants and their descendants in countries such as Australia, Italy, the United Kingdom, Germany, New Zealand, Canada, the United States and others. A 1964 estimate put the number of Macedonian emigrants at over 580,000.

Among scholars of nationalism, a number of types of nationalism have been presented. Nationalism may manifest itself as part of official state ideology or as a popular non-state movement and may be expressed along Race, civic, ethnic, language, religious or ideological lines. These self-definitions of the nation are used to classify types of nationalism, but such categories are not mutually exclusive and many nationalist movements combine some or all of these elements to varying degrees. Nationalist movements can also be classified by other criteria, such as scale and location.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English people</span> Ethnic group native to England

The English people are an ethnic group and nation native to England, who speak the English language, a West Germanic language, and share a common ancestry, history, and culture. The English identity began with the Anglo-Saxons, when they were known as the Angelcynn, meaning race or tribe of the Angles. Their ethnonym is derived from the Angles, one of the Germanic peoples who invaded Britain around the 5th century AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British people</span> People from the UK and its territories

British people or Britons, also known colloquially as Brits, are the citizens of the United Kingdom, the British Overseas Territories, and the Crown dependencies. British nationality law governs modern British citizenship and nationality, which can be acquired, for instance, by descent from British nationals. When used in a historical context, "British" or "Britons" can refer to the Ancient Britons, the Celtic-speaking inhabitants of Great Britain during the Iron Age, whose descendants formed the major part of the modern Welsh people, Cornish people, Bretons and considerable proportions of English people. It also refers to citizens of the former British Empire, who settled in the country prior to 1973, and hold neither UK citizenship nor nationality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Americans</span> Citizens and nationals of the United States

Americans are the citizens and nationals of the United States of America. The United States is home to people of many racial and ethnic origins; consequently, U.S. federal law does not equate nationality with race or ethnicity but with citizenship. The U.S. has 37 ancestry groups with more than one million individuals. White Americans with ancestry from Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa form the largest racial and ethnic group at 61.6% of the U.S. population. Hispanic and Latino Americans form the second-largest group and are 18.7% of the American population. Black Americans constitute the country's third-largest ancestry group and are 12.4% of the total U.S. population. Asian Americans are the country's fourth-largest group, composing 6% of the American population. The country's 3.7 million Native Americans account for about 1.1%, and some 574 native tribes are recognized by the federal government. In addition to the U.S., people of American descent can be found internationally. As many as seven million Americans are estimated to be living abroad, and make up the American diaspora.

In the demography of the United States, some people self-identify their ancestral origin or descent as "American", rather than the more common officially recognized racial and ethnic groups that make up the bulk of the American people. The majority of these respondents are visibly white and do not identify with their ancestral European ethnic origins. The latter response is attributed to a multitude of generational distance from ancestral lineages, and these tend to be Anglo-Americans of English, Scots-Irish, Welsh, Scottish or other British ancestries, as demographers have observed that those ancestries tend to be recently undercounted in U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey ancestry self-reporting estimates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multiculturalism in Canada</span> Canadian social situation

Multiculturalism in Canada was officially adopted by the government during the 1970s and 1980s. The Canadian federal government has been described as the instigator of multiculturalism as an ideology because of its public emphasis on the social importance of immigration. The 1960s Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism is often referred to as the origin of modern political awareness of multiculturalism, resulting in Canada being one of the most multicultural nations in the world. The official state policy of multiculturalism is often cited as one of Canada's significant accomplishments, and a key distinguishing element of Canadian identity and Canadian values.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bosnians</span> Citizens and nationals of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnians are people native to the country of Bosnia and Herzegovina, especially the region of Bosnia. As a common demonym, the term Bosnians refers to all inhabitants/citizens of the country, regardless of any ethnic, cultural or religious affiliation. It can also be used as a designation for anyone who is descended from the region of Bosnia. Also, a Bosnian can be anyone who holds citizenship of the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina and thus is largely synonymous with the all-encompassing national demonym Bosnians and Herzegovinians.

Québécois are people associated with Quebec. The term is most often used in reference to either descendants of the French settlers in Quebec or people of any ethnicity who live and trace their origins in the province of Quebec.

References