Early in the morning of 15 December 2024, two Russian Project 1577 Volgoneftoil tankers, Volgoneft-212 and Volgoneft-239, were caught in a storm just south of the Kerch Strait. Volgoneft-212, which was reportedly carrying about 4,900 tonnes of mazut, broke in two and sank, resulting in an oil spill and the death of one crew member. Volgoneft-239 was damaged, causing her to drift for several hours until she ran aground near the Port of Taman, Krasnodar Krai. She, too, began leaking oil.
Both ships still had some of their cargo intact and the oil leak on Volgoneft-239 was stopped by the next day, with an estimated spillage of either 2,400 or 5,000 tonnes.[c] Reports of puddles of oil making landfall between the Crimean Bridge and the town of Anapa began on 17 December, with about 37 miles (60 kilometres) of coastline becoming polluted. As a result, a state of emergency was declared in the Anapsky and Temryuksky Districts that day. Further declarations occurred across the entirety of Krasnodar Krai on 25 December, federally the following day and in Crimea by 28 December.
The incident was noted as the first spillage of mazut in history by the Russian Ministry of Transport, a substance which the organisation noted had "no proven methods for removing it from the water column" due to its properties. It was later labelled as the "worst ecological disaster of the 21st century" by Viktor Danilov-Danilyan, head of the Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences and ex-minister of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
Separate criminal cases were opened by Russia into both ships for potential maritime safety breaches, though the case for Volgoneft-212 had an additional charge for negligent homicide. Both captains were charged on 18 December, with the captain of Volgoneft-212 being placed under investigative custody and the captain of Volgoneft-239 being placed under house arrest for two months each.
Background
Volgoneft-212 was built in 1969, was 136 metres in length and was registered in Saint Petersburg. She was owned and managed by KamaTransOil and Kama Shipping, both of which are based in Perm, Russia. They acquired the ship in 2014[1][2][3] and have a licence to transport dangerous cargo by inland waterways and sea indefinitely, which was issued in 2016. Kama Shipping was fined ₽400,000 ($6,406) in 2019 for, between 1 May and 23 July that year, transporting dangerous cargo by sea without a special permit.[1]
Volgoneft-212 was refitted in 2024, with The Guardian reporting that in this refit "the centre was cut out and the stern and bow were welded together, forming a huge seam in the middle. It is this section that appears to have broken."[2]
Volgoneft-239 was built in 1973, is 132 metres in length and was registered in Astrakhan and has been owned and operated by Volgotransneft since 2010. Both tankers have a maximum loading capacity of about 4,200 tonnes.[1][2][3][4]Mash reported that both ships were reclassified some time in the 1990s from purely riverine traffic to river and maritime use.[5]
Databases claim that both ships are controlled by Volgotanker,[6] a company based in Samara which transports oil products in Russia's inland waterways and along the coast of the Black Sea. Almost all of their ships were built between 1966 and 1990 with a capacity of between 4,000 and 5,000 dwt.[7] The actual ownership of the ships was called "murky" by TradeWinds due to bankruptcy proceedings against them and attempts to sell off their assets.[6]
iStories reported that, in the months prior to the incident, both ships had been shuttling between Port Kavkaz in the Kerch Strait and oil refinery terminals on the Volga River.[3]Izvestia reported that both tankers should have been decommissioned 10–15 years prior to the incident as they have a service life of between 30–40 years. Both were tested for their suitability for transporting dangerous cargo in July 2024. Volgoneft-239 had had its licence suspended and thus should not have been at sea.[1]
Volgoneft-139 was carrying 4,800 tonnes of fuel oil when she anchored in the Kerch Strait in a storm in November 2007.[8][9] She split in two, spilling from 1,300 to 1,600 tonnes of oil, resulting in "tens of kilometres" of pollution on both sides of the Kerch Strait.[8][9][10] 13 crew members were rescued, and four other ships sank in the storm.[8][11]
On 19 April 2017, the Panamanian-registered 3,500 tonne bulk carrierGeroi Arsenala split in two and sank about 19 nautical miles (35km) south of the Taman Peninsula between the Port of Azov in Rostov Oblast and Turkey while carrying grain in a storm. One crew member was rescued, while a further two were later found dead; nine were missing.[12][13]
In November 2023, the Strait was closed due to severe stormy weather as a measure to prevent damage to ships. Despite this, during the closure, two ships, Matros Shevchenko and Matros Pozynich, stopped close to each other in the Strait. The pair collided at low speed, drifting into an anchored ship, Kavkaz-5.[14]
Environmental issues in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov
The Black Sea and the Sea of Azov have faced numerous issues since the 20th century including the polluting effects of the aforementioned incidents and from nearby ports and rivers; the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War, with ships being sunk, underwater explosions and Russia using protected lands as training grounds or extraction sites for materials; overfishing; invasive species; and climate change. These issues have caused changes to the local ecosystems and caused some species to disappear.[15]
Since the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine however, these negative effects were greatly exacerbated. There has been a rapid die-off of dolphins, porpoises and other cetaceans, with cases of live animals washing up on shore also increasing. The highest rate of cases is around Crimea, particularly near to Sevastopol, where several Russian bases reside. In early 2022, Russian warships began blockading Ukrainian ports. The release of ballast water by the warships is not monitored, allowing pollutants and invasive species from other areas to enter the environment. Sunken warships also caused several oil spills, with the spills extending tens of thousands of square kilometres, including into protected waters, with oil polymerization in the water causing mass bird deaths.[15]
Fires from military activities have also damaged several national parks. As an example, a total of 131 fires were recorded on the Kinburn Peninsula, a protected area for marine and coastal colonies, in 2022, destroying over 5,000 hectares of the park and the nesting places of about 100 bird species.[15]
Following the destruction of the Kakhovka Dam on 6 June 2023, several protected areas were flooded, with freshwater polluted by fuels, lubricants, fertilizers and wastewater from settlements and fields entering the Black Sea. In the days that followed, rapid desalination of sea water from 14 to 4ppm was discovered in the waters near Odesa, Ukraine. In some coastal areas, researchers noted acute toxicity in the water, with nitrogen concentrations drastically rising, an indicator of direct sewage pollution. Polluted water was also found in the Danube River.[15] About 30,000 animals were killed as a result, with species such as the squacco heron and the little egret disappearing.[16]
Despite this, in the years preceding 2023, researchers noticed indicators that some ecosystems had begun gradually recovering. Although it is currently impossible to assess the impacts on the Sea of Azov, researchers were able to have limited access to the Black Sea. What they discovered is that, due to tourist travel being banned in the north western Black Sea due to mining and a lessening in commercial ships and fishing, there had been a lessening of pressure on ecosystems. Several species considered rare had also become more common with the lack of tourism.[15]
Incident
Early in the morning of 15 December 2024,[17]Volgoneft-212 and Volgoneft-239 were heading south out of the Kerch Strait, entering the more open waters of the Black Sea.[18]Volgoneft-212 had 13 crew on board,[2][5] while Volgoneft-239 had 14 crew on board;[4] both ships were carrying mazut, a low grade heavy fuel oil used in various applications across the former Soviet Union and Iran.[19][20]Volgoneft-239 was transporting their cargo for the Russian Navy,[21] while Volgoneft-212's cargo was for FIRN, a tanker under the Russian shadow fleet.[22] On 10 November, Volgoneft-212 left the Port of Saratov and was heading to Port Kavkaz with 4,900 tonnes, while Volgoneft-239 was carrying about 4,300 tonnes from the Port of Azov.[1][23][24]
According to a man from the Russian Professional Union of Seafarers, Igor Kovalchuk, the maximum wave height for Volgoneft-212 was 2.5 metres (8ft 2in), and the maximum for Volgoneft-239 was 2 metres (6ft 7in).[1] Both were rated for wind speeds of up to 40 miles per hour (64km/h).[18] There are differing reports as to the conditions the ships faced. According to unnamed Russian officials in Crimea on the day of the incident, the storm reached up to a seven on the Beaufort scale, with wind speeds up to 32 to 38 miles per hour (51 to 61km/h).[3] According to meteorologists at the Crimean State Hydrometeorological Service, wind speeds of about 60 miles per hour (97km/h) were expected.[1] Similarly, according to a Television News Service report on the day of the incident, waves reached a height of 3.5 metres (11ft), with wind speeds of about 53 miles per hour (85km/h).[18]
One of the crew members of Volgoneft-212, Alexander Marchenko, told Izvestia that he did not find any issues with the ship on his morning rounds, but remarked that there had been strong waves. Later that day, an alarm was sounded, with the ship splitting in two about 5 miles (8km) from shore after it was hit by a large wave.[1][2][18] Its bow sank and one crew member died of hypothermia.[4][25] The majority of its cargo was spilled.[18] Soon after Volgoneft-212 was damaged, Volgoneft-239 sustained damage and lost power, drifting for several hours[2][18] until she ran aground about 80 metres (260ft) from shore near the Port of Taman.[3][7]
Two rescue tugboats were sent from Kerch, while two Mil Mi-8 helicopters and over 50 people were deployed to assist in the rescue efforts.[4][26] The rescue efforts were complicated due to the darkness and the storm,[27] though the remaining crew members of Volgoneft-212 were rescued,[5] at least eight of which had to be rescued from the water. 11 crew members were hospitalised, two of which were treated for hypothermia.[4][7]
Efforts to rescue the crew of Volgoneft-239 were temporarily suspended due to inclement weather, with the ship having all necessary means to ensure the safety of the crew, though rescuers maintained contact with the ship.[28] Rescue efforts were resumed the following day, rescuing the entire crew.[19]
Nearby incidents
Volgoneft-109, a Project 550A Volgoneft tanker that was built in 1973 with a capacity of 4,700 summer deadweight,[29] was carrying about 4,000 tonnes of mazut, and was anchored near Port Kavkaz in the Kerch Strait when she broadcast a distress signal early on 17 December. The captain reported an internal crack in a cargo tank which was leaking its cargo into a ballast tank.[30][31] The crew remained aboard and was assisted by a salvage vessel,[31] with a spokesperson from the Federal Agency for Sea and Inland Water Transport stating that "The water tightness of the hull itself is not compromised, there is no leakage into the sea."[30] It was later noted by Meduza that Volgoneft-109 was also likely transporting for FIRN.[22]
Aftermath
This incident was, according to the Russian Ministry of Transport, the first spillage of mazut. Due to its density being roughly the same as water[32][33] and its solidification temperature being 25°C (77°F),[33] mazut either sinks to the seabed or remains suspended below the surface.[32][33] As the oil sinks, it poisons animals, molluscs and plankton. Oil that either rises to the surface or remains suspended just below it covers birds in oil, poisoning them.[34] Dmitry Lisitsyn, an environmentalist who has been designated a foreign agent in Russia, stated that the incident will worsen in summer, where the fuel that remains will release more toxic fumes.[34]
According to the ministry, "The world has no proven methods for removing it from the water column, which is why the main approach is to collect it from the shoreline when it washes up in coastal areas."[32][33] It was later labelled by Viktor Danilov-Danilyan, head of the Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences and ex-minister of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, the "worst ecological disaster of the 21st century".[35][36]
Alexander Kozlov, Minister for the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, in a call with President Vladimir Putin on 23 January, stated that he hoped Black Sea coastal beaches would be cleared of oil by mid-2025, though he believed the rest of the Russian Black Sea coast would not recover from the spill until May 2026.[37]
Despite earlier estimates based on the testimony of one of the captains stating that about 3,700 tonnes of oil had been spilled,[18][38][39] later estimates given by the Ministry of Transport on 2 January 2025 stated that about 2,400 tonnes had spilled.[39]BBC Verify gave an estimate on 24 January, stating that 5,000 tonnes had been spilled.[40]
The Ministry of Emergency Situations stated that, as of 25 January, 173,000 tonnes of polluted materials had been collected.[41]
Clean-up efforts
Putin ordered the government to create a group to coordinate the rescue efforts and attempt to mitigate the ecological effects after meeting with the ministers of Emergency Situations and Natural Resources and Environment, Alexander Kurenkov and Kozlov respectively.[4] He further appointed Deputy Prime Minister Vitaly Savelyev to head a task force aimed at mitigating the damage to the environment.[3]
Ministry of Emergency Situations personnel removing contaminated sand from a beach
Svetlana Radionova, head of Rosprirodnadzor, arrived in Krasnodar Krai on 16 December.[1][4] She said that specialists were assessing the site;[4] teams from the Marine Rescue Service and the Ministry of Emergency Situations were also dispatched to attempt to mitigate the environmental effects.[3] The Federal Agency for Fishery stated that "After the weather normalizes and disaster relief efforts are completed, an assessment of the damage to marine life will be given."[25] It was discovered that Vologneft-239 had also begun leaking oil, though some of the fuel containers on both ships were still intact. The oil from the ships began drifting towards the coast north west of the Port of Taman, Krasnodar Krai, between the Tuzla Spit and Cape Panagiya,[19][24] though as of that afternoon it had not reached the shoreline.[38]
Reports of patches of oil building up on the coastline began on 17 December, with about 37 miles (60km) of coastline between the Crimean Bridge and Anapa becoming polluted.[9][42] A state of emergency was later declared in both the Anapsky and Temryuksky Districts.[30][43] Oil accumulated on the shore between the villages of Veselovka, Blagoveshchenskaya, and Vityazevo.[44] This stretch of coast is a narrow coastal spit, which separates a set of saltwater lagoons from the Black Sea.
That day, Kondratyev said "There are currently 267 people working on site from emergency services, with 50 units of equipment involved. If necessary, we will increase the number of forces and resources,"[42] though other estimates placed the number at 500 volunteers.[43] According to satellite imagery, Volgoneft-239 was still aground and was slowly breaking apart as of 17 December.[18] The number of volunteers rose to about 4,000 by 18 December,[45][46] alongside about 1,500 rescue workers and officials by 19 December.[47] Sergey Stranichny, a senior marine scientist, stated that satellite monitoring up to 18 December had shown that the cargo of Volgoneft-212 was still leaking, noting that strong winds were spreading it to the east.[48] Clean-up efforts were hindered by the ongoing storm.[49]
It was reported by Kozlov that, by 23 December, up to 200,000 tonnes of sand may have become polluted.[36] A regional state of emergency was declared in Krasnodar Krai on 25 December.[50] By at least the following day, patches of oil were found on the southern coast of Crimea;[51] a federal state of emergency was declared by President Putin, allowing for further resources to be provided by the government.[51][52] By 28 December a state of emergency was also declared in Crimea,[53] with oil being discovered near Tobechytske Lake, a salt lake in the south-eastern area of the Kerch Peninsula.[54]
2025
A small oil slick was found near the shores of Sevastopol on the south western coast of Crimea on 3 January,[55] approximately 155 miles (249 kilometres) from the Kerch Strait;[56] a regional emergency was declared on 4 January by Mikhail Razvozhaev, the regional governor, after four patches of oil were found on beaches in the area.[57] On 7 January, small oil slicks were discovered near Yevpatoria, a city approximately 39 miles (63 kilometres) north of Sevastopol.[58] By the following day, "at least" 287 tonnes of polluted materials had been collected in Crimea and around Sevastopol.[59]
Dmytro Pletenchuk, a spokesperson for the Ukrainian Navy, warned on 9 January that the oil spill could reach the coasts of Odesa and Mykolaiv Oblasts.[60] That same day, Putin ordered that a national response team be created while chastising regional officials for not doing enough to mitigate the effects of the incident.[34]
While investigating the stern portion of Volgoneft-239 the following day, specialists discovered an oil slick of about 1.1 square miles (2.8 square kilometres) on the shoreline.[61] Seven new slicks were also discovered, including on the coasts of four Crimean raions and on Tuzla Island.[62] Some time prior to these discoveries, a road was built to better access the ship.[6] Satellite imagery from 10 January showed two oil slicks in the Kerch Strait, one of which was 15 miles (24 kilometres) while the other was 3.5 miles (5.6 kilometres) in length.[40]
According to officials, as of 11 January[63][34] there was an estimated 5,000 tonnes of oil still at the bottom of the sea.[34] An oil slick of over 9 miles (14 kilometres) was found the following day on the Berdyansk Spit, south of the city of Berdiansk, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, about 109 miles (175 kilometres) north of the site of the initial spill. Another smaller slick was discovered on another spit further east.[64] Satellite imagery later showed an oil slick of about 115 square miles (300 square kilometres) extending over almost 62 miles (100 kilometres) just south of the spit.[65]
The government of Krasnodar Krai stated on 14 January that they would be building a 400 metre containment barrier around Volgoneft-239 to prevent further spills from the ship.[6] That day, the Ukrainian Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources announced that an agreement had been signed between Ukraine, Romania and Bulgaria to jointly assist each-other in clean-up efforts in anticipation of fuel reaching their coasts.[66]
A student at the Anapa Industrial College, Alexander Komin, died overnight on 15 January after having volunteered to remove polluted materials from the beach of Anapa. He had chronic asthma. The college stated that the cause of death was unknown, however forensic pathologists were as of that date attempting to determine whether toxic fumes contributed to his death. Both the college and the Krasnodar Emergency Response Centre denied that he was a part of an organised group, stating that being a part of one of these groups was prohibited to minors.[67] Krasnodar Krai Minister of Health, Yevgeny Filippov, noted that between 15 December and 15 January, 146 people needed medical attention after working to remove polluted materials, three of which were hospitalised.[68]
The Maritime Executive noted that, despite providing little to no protection from exposure to both fumes from and petroleum itself, some of the victims used cloth masks and fabric gloves while cleaning the beaches instead of rubber protective clothing and respirators. Volunteers reported that the usage and availability of such protective equipment was varied.[69]Marine Insight further noted that many of the victims had suffered chemical burns, nausea, headaches, breathing problems and a lingering taste of oil.[70]
Despite concerns about pollutants in the water and the ongoing discovery and clean-up of polluted materials, Epiphany celebrations, where celebrants perform, among other things, winter swimming, was still hosted on 19 January along the coast of Anapa. Though officials had checked the water prior to the event, new oil slicks had been deposited onto the shore hours after the checks.[71] That same day, workers began pumping oil from Volgoneft-239.[34]
A spokesperson from Greenpeace stated to BBC Verify on 24 January that oil from the spill had spread across 154 square miles (400 square kilometres).[40] That day, Ivan Rusev,[72] head of the research department at the National Nature Park "Tuzlivski lymany",[PS 1] reported that, following stormy weather, oil had been discovered near the Danube Biosphere Reserve and the Tuzly Lagoons National Nature Park, about 81 miles (130 kilometres) south west of Odesa. The Danube Biosphere Reserve is partly within the borders of both Ukraine and Romania.[72]
Russian officials on stated 25 January that the remaining 1,488 tonnes of oil was removed from Volgoneft-239; using that figure, about 2,812 tonnes of oil was leaked from the ship.[41]
Effects on wildlife
A bird being treated by volunteers after the oil spill
Reports of birds covered in oil, either dead or struggling to fly on the shoreline, started to come in on 17 December; while one such report was from Volna, a short distance east of the Port of Taman, another two were from a beach near Anapa and Vityazevo, about 30 miles (48km) to the southeast.[73][74]
Birds covered in oil have been found on Georgia's Black Sea coast.[75] A rescue centre was opened in Vityazevo, with volunteers working to remove oil from affected birds and veterinarians deciding whether they should be released or moved elsewhere.[47] An ornithologist who arrived at the centre on 24 December stated that "...with many of these birds, there’s damage to the fatty layer coating their feathers. This layer prevents them from getting wet and freezing when they dive. If we release them now, they’ll freeze. Of course, many can’t fly properly anyway and would just die. We may need to wait until spring when the birds molt and grow new feathers."[76]
By 8 January, about 5,550 birds had been rescued,[59][75] though Ukrainian biologist Ivan Rusev estimated that about 10% of the birds brought to rehabilitation centres survive. At the Pelikan Centre, a seabird rehabilitation centre in Russia, 175 of the 1,051 birds sent there had died as of that date.[75] He further estimated that, by some time three weeks after the incident, the death count could be between 15,000–20,000, though he believed that that figure was "only the tip of the iceberg".[75][77][34]
Dmitry Glazov, a research associate at the Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, stated that the incident affected a "critical area" for dolphins in the Black Sea, believing that it could "impact the ecosystem for at least another 10 years, if not longer."[47] By 5 January, 61 cetaceans had been found dead[78] near Novorossiysk, Taman and Anapa.[34] Of those, the Delfa Dolphin Rescue and Research Centre reported that, based on the condition of the bodies, 32 had been killed by the spill. The majority of them had been killed within the first 10 days,[78] with a large portion of the bodies being that of Azov dolphins, an endangered species of harbour porpoise.[79][80] Delfa further reported that, between 5–11 January, another 28 dolphins were found dead as a result of the spill.[81] A further 32 were found in Crimea and near Sevastopol.[34]
Economic effects
Nina Ostanina, head of the Russian State Duma Committee on Family Affairs, told Parlamentskaya Gazeta that bookings at children's recreation and health retreats in Anapa had dropped over 27% in January 2025 and 40% for that summer.[82] Despite concerns over the levels of pollution and that Russian Black Sea coastal beaches would not be cleaned before mid-2025, regional authorities in Volgograd spent at least ₽16 million ($163,000) to send 160 orphans, disabled children and homeless children to Anapa. Plans for further contracts in the region suggests that officials aim to spend up to ₽26 million ($265,300) for similar trips. According to The Moscow Times, egional governments across Russia spent more than ₽300 million ($3 million) on similar trips to Black Sea resorts in the two weeks after the spill.[83]
Russia’s environmental watchdog Rosprirodnadzor said last week that it would file a lawsuit against those responsible for the spill but did not disclose which individuals or entities it plans to take to court. The two oil tankers were operated by Volgatransneft, while the heavy fuel oil on board the ships belonged to the state oil firm Rosneft
According to Svitlana Hrynchuk, the Ukrainian Minister of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources, damage to the Black Sea ecosystem could be in excess of $14 billion.[84]
Criticism
The clean-up efforts have faced criticism. On 22 December, Delfa Dolphin Rescue and Research Centre reported that some of the bags used to collect sand polluted by oil were swept by the water into the Black Sea after they were left on the shore.[85] Similarly, Danilov-Danilyan stated in a press conference that "There are no bulldozers there, no trucks. Practically no heavy machinery." and that volunteers have "shovels and useless plastic bags that rip apart [...] While the bags wait to finally be collected, storms arrive and they end up back in the sea. It’s unthinkable!"[36]
In an interview with RBC, he further stated "At the very least, they should not have been using vessels that should have been written off 20 years ago. In principle, river-sea vessels should not be released for winter sea navigation. It is impossible to avoid catastrophic consequences with such an attitude — sooner or later it would have occurred. And serious work to eliminate the consequences began only on the ninth or 10th day after the accident."[34]
One volunteer who left for Anapa to help with the clean-up on 23 December criticized the disorganisation of the efforts, saying "Right now, people are collecting contaminated sand and moving it in bags from one place, where it poisons the soil, to another, where it still poisons the soil. For example, in Voskresenskaya, trucks just dumped bags outside town, not far from people’s homes. I also read that they dumped bags near the town of Primorsky, leaving them near the Tamano-Zaporozhsky Nature Reserve, where different kinds of birds spend the winter." The same volunteer also stated that, at Vityazevo, there was only volunteers cleaning up the beach. Similarly, another volunteer said "When we got to the beach [at Dzhemete], there were no emergency service workers. Later, we saw officials giving interviews in front of the volunteers at work, which was very frustrating. They could have at least had the decency to pick up a shovel and help us."[76]
During a cabinet meeting on 9 January, President Putin criticised the coordination between regional and federal organisations[86][87] and criticised the "inadequate response" from the Ministry of Emergency Situations,[87] saying "From what I see and from the information I receive, I conclude that everything being done to minimise the damage is clearly not enough yet."[86] As a result, he requested a detailed report from Kurenkov on the incident as of that date and steps to be taken to mitigate the impact of the spill.[87] A spokesperson from the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Heorhii Tykhyy, called Putin's concern performative, saying "Only after the scale of the disaster became too obvious to conceal its horrific consequences did Russia begin to show its so-called 'concern.' The accidents involving the tankers Volgoneft-212 and Volgoneft-239 in the Kerch Strait, caused by the use of outdated vessels, confirm Russia’s inability to adhere to maritime safety standards."[88]
On 24 January, the Ukrainian government called on the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to perform an independent investigation into the handling of the incident by Russian authorities both before and during the clean-up efforts. The filing with the IMO claimed "[that t]he Russian authorities initially concealed the environmental impact of the incident on the Black Sea region", further stating that the ships involved were sailing in unsuitable weather conditions in "gross violation of the fundamental principles of safety". Oleksiy Kuleba, deputy prime minister for rebuilding Ukraine, further called on the IMO to increase sanctions against the Russian shadow fleet.[89]
DW News reported on 26 January that a number of volunteers believed that they were doing the majority of the clean-up work, not government organisations, believing that government representatives only hindered their work. In a January ministerial meeting, Putin called upon officials to become more active in assisting clean-up efforts. In early January, as a part of one of these efforts, employees from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment released 160 birds without consulting local volunteers. One volunteer called it a PR stunt, with nearly all of the birds being found dead on the coast within a day; experts stated that the natural insulation on the birds' feathers had not had enough of a chance to recover.[82]
Investigation
Separate criminal cases were opened by the Investigative Committee (IC) for each ship.[1][4] Both were initially opened due to potential breaches of maritime safety regulations, though the case involving Volgoneft-212 was later expanded to include charges relating to negligent homicide due to the death of a crew member.[4][27]
At a press conference, President Putin said "Law enforcement bodies will give an assessment of the actions of the ships’ captains. I was informed that the captains violated regulations by not taking shelter in time. Some ships did take shelter, and they are fine. And these ones did not. Moreover, they anchored where they shouldn’t have."[90] On 18 December both captains were charged;[91] the following day, the captain of Volgoneft-212 was placed under investigative custody for two months,[92] while the captain of Volgoneft-239 was placed under house arrest for two months on suspicion of breaching maritime safety regulations.[93][94]
According to Dmitry Zatsarinsky, a lawyer in Russia, the investigation could last between several months and more than a year, with the potential for sentencing being up to five years imprisonment or correctional labour for violating maritime safety regulations.[1]
Related events
Volgotransneft received six ships from Volga-Bunker in a deal which finished on 23 June 2022: the 4,190 deadweight tonnage (dwt) Volgoneft-164, Volgoneft-208 and Volgoneft-219, all of which were built in 1970; the 5,900 dwt Volgoneft-206, which was built in 1969; the 4,200 dwt Volgoneft-246, which was built in 1975; and the 3,475 gross tonnage (gt) Volgoneft-264, which was built in 1978.[6]
Following a failure to pay for the deal, Volga-Bunker began court proceedings seeking ₽6.5 million ($63,000) from Volgatransneft. Lawyers from Volgotransneft failed to attend a hearing at the Moscow Arbitration Court in January 2024, leading the court to rule against them, ordering them to pay the owed amount. Volgotransneft failed to comply, leading Volga-Bunker to file a demand in the same court for Volgotransneft to be declared bankrupt.[6]
Related Research Articles
Kerch, also known as Keriç or Kerich, is a city of regional significance on the Kerch Peninsula in the east of Crimea. It has a population of 147,033 .
The Sea of Azov is an inland shelf sea in Eastern Europe connected to the Black Sea by the narrow Strait of Kerch, and sometimes regarded as a northern extension of the Black Sea. The sea is bounded by Russia on the east, and by Ukraine on the northwest and southwest. It is an important access route for Central Asia, from the Caspian Sea via the Volga–Don Canal.
The Kerch Strait is a strait in Eastern Europe. It connects the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, separating the Kerch Peninsula of Crimea in the west from the Taman Peninsula of Russia's Krasnodar Krai in the east. The strait is 3.1 kilometres (1.9 mi) to 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) wide and up to 18 metres (59 ft) deep. The most important harbor, the Crimean city of Kerch, gives its name to the strait, formerly known as the Cimmerian Bosporus or Straits of Taman. It has also been called the Straits of Yenikale after the Yeni-Kale fortress in Kerch.
Port Kavkaz is a small harbour on the Chushka Spit in Krasnodar Krai, Russia, on the eastern side of Kerch Strait. It is adjacent to the village of Chushka, which is now largely deserted due to toxic effects of the port.
Mazut is a low-quality heavy fuel oil, used in power plants and similar applications in Iran and some countries of the former Soviet Union. In the West, through fluid catalytic cracking, mazut is distilled into diesel and other light distillates. Mazut may be used for heating houses in some parts of the former USSR and in countries of the Far East that do not have the facilities to blend or break it down into more conventional petro-chemicals.
Volgotanker is a Russian company engaged in the business of tank storage and transporting oil and oil products by tanker along the inland waterways and coastal seas of European Russia. It is headquartered in Samara.
The Zaliv Shipbuilding Yard is located in Kerch, Crimea and specializes in the construction of tankers and container carriers, and the repair of ships of different types and tonnage.
Chushka Spit is a sandy spit in the northern part of the Strait of Kerch. It extends from Cape Achilleion and the town of Ilich to the south-west in the direction of the Black Sea for almost 18 kilometres (11 mi). Administratively, it belongs to Temryuksky District, Krasnodar Krai, Russia.
The Crimean Bridge, also called Kerch Strait Bridge or Kerch Bridge, is a pair of parallel bridges, one for a four-lane road and one for a double-track railway, spanning the Kerch Strait between the Taman Peninsula of Krasnodar Krai in Russia and the Kerch Peninsula of Crimea. Built by the Russian Federation after its annexation of Crimea at the start of 2014, the bridge cost ₽227.92 billion (US$3.7 billion) and has a length of 19 km (12 mi), making it the longest bridge in Europe and the longest bridge ever constructed by Russia.
The Kerch Strait incident was an international incident that occurred on 25 November 2018 in the Kerch Strait, during which the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) coast guard fired upon and captured three Ukrainian Navy vessels after they attempted to transit from the Black Sea into the Sea of Azov through the strait on their way to the port of Mariupol. It was the first time that Russian forces had openly engaged Ukrainian forces during the Russo-Ukrainian War.
The 2019 Kerch Strait liquified gas tanker fire was a major incident that occurred on 21 January 2019 when two ships, Kandy and Maestro, caught fire while transferring liquefied gas from one vessel to another in the Kerch Strait. The incident subsequently killed fourteen crewmembers and six went missing, including Libyan, Turkish, and Indian sailors, while twelve men jumped into the water and were rescued by the Russian Navy. Kandy was carrying a crew of seventeen, while Maestro was manned by fifteen crewmembers. At the time of the incident, both ships were carrying 4,500 tonnes of fuel. The ship-to-ship fuel transfer resulted a fire explosion and spread across both ships; Tanzanian-flagged Turkish ships' Maestro and Kandy. The blaze lasted more than four days.
Beginning in July 2022, a series of explosions and fires occurred on the Russian-occupied Crimean Peninsula, from where the Russian Army had launched its offensive on Southern Ukraine during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Occupied since 2014, Crimea was a base for the subsequent Russian occupation of Kherson Oblast and Russian occupation of Zaporizhzhia Oblast.
MV Volgoneft-139 (Волгонефть-139) was a Project 550A Volgoneft oil tanker that was owned and operated by Volgotanker. She was built in Bulgaria for the Soviet Union in 1978. A storm in the Kerch Strait in 2007 broke her in two, spilling her cargo into the sea. Her bow sank, and her stern section was later scrapped. Her spilt cargo caused a major pollution incident.
MV Volgoneft-248 (Волгонефть-248) was a Project 1577 Volgoneft oil tanker that was owned and operated by Volgotanker. She was built in the Soviet Union in 1975. A storm in the Sea of Marmara in 1999 broke her in two. Her forward section sank, and her aft section ran aground. Her bow was later raised and scrapped. Much of her cargo of oil was spilt, causing a major pollution incident. That pollution, its effect, and the clean-up work, have become the subject of a number of academic studies in Turkey.
MV Volgoneft-239 (Волгонефть-239) is a Project 1577 Volgoneft oil tanker that was built in the Soviet Union in 1973. She ran aground in a storm in the Kerch Strait in 2024. Another Project 1577 tanker, Volgoneft-212, broke in two and foundered nearby in the same storm, causing the 2024 Kerch Strait oil spill.
MV Volgoneft-212 (Волгонефть-212) was a Project 1577 Volgoneft oil tanker that was built in the Soviet Union in 1969. She broke in two in a storm in the Kerch Strait in 2024, causing the 2024 Kerch Strait oil spill. Another Project 1577 tanker, Volgoneft-239, ran aground nearby in the same storm. Volgoneft-212 is not the first Project 1577 tanker to have broken in two in a heavy sea. Volgoneft-248 did so in similar circumstances in the Sea of Marmara in 1999.
Volgoneft (Волгонефть) is a series of oil tankers that was designed in the Soviet Union for the Volgotanker shipping company. Ships of this series were built from the 1960s to the 1990s. They were designed as "mixed navigation vessels": primarily for use on the large canals and navigable rivers of European Russia, but also capable of short-sea shipping in favourable sea conditions, with waves no more than 2 metres high.
↑ Spiridonov, Roman; Brushnevskaya, Angelica (8 January 2025). "Экотрагедия в Черном море: «Погибли уже от 15 до 20 тысяч птиц»"["From 15 to 20 thousand birds have already died." What are the chances of survival for birds and dolphins affected by fuel oil pollution in the Black Sea?]. Krim Realii (in Russian). Retrieved 20 January 2025.
↑ Between December 15 2024 and January 15 2025, according to Krasnodar Krai Minister of Health Yevgeny Filippov
↑ According to a report from TradeWinds, ownership of both ships is "murky". They cited unidentified databases as saying that both ships are controlled by Volgotanker, though the company is under bankruptcy proceedings and have made attempts to sell off their assets.
↑ The Russian Ministry of Transport claims that 2,400 tonnes were spilled as of 2 January 2025, while BBC Verify claims that 5,000 tonnes were spilled as of 24 January that year.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
