Five Precepts

Last updated
Translations of
Five Precepts
Pali pañcasīlāni
(Devanagari: पञ्चसीलानि)
Sanskrit pañcaśīlāni
(Devanagari: पञ्चशीलानि)
Bengali পঞ্চশীলানি
Burmese ပဉ္စသီလ ငါးပါးသီလ
(IPA:  [pjɪ̀ɴsa̰ θìla̰ ŋá bá θìla̰] )
Chinese 五戒 pinyin: wǔjiè
(Cantonese Jyutping: ng5 gaai3)
Japanese 五戒
(rōmaji: go kai)
Khmer បញ្ចសីល, និច្ចសីល, សិក្ខាបទ៥, សីល៥
(Panchasel, Nechsel, Sekhabot Pram, Sel Pram)
Korean 오계
(RR: ogye)
Mon သဳ မသုန်
([sɔe pəsɔn])
Sinhalese පන්සිල්
Thai เบญจศีล, ศีล ๕
(RTGS: Benchasin, Sin Ha)
Vietnamese Ngũ giới
Indonesian Pancasila, Pancasila
Glossary of Buddhism

The five precepts (Pali : pañcasīla; Sanskrit : pañcaśīla)) or rules of training (Pali : sikkhapada; Sanskrit : śikṣapada [1] ) constitute the basic code of ethics undertaken by upāsaka and upāsikā (lay followers) of Buddhism. The precepts in all the traditions are essentially identical and are commitments to abstain from harming living beings, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying and intoxication.

Buddhist ethics Ethics in Buddhism

Buddhist ethics are traditionally based on what Buddhists view as the enlightened perspective of the Buddha, or other enlightened beings such as Bodhisattvas. The Indian term for ethics or morality used in Buddhism is Śīla or sīla (Pāli). Śīla in Buddhism is one of three sections of the Noble Eightfold Path, and is a code of conduct that embraces a commitment to harmony and self-restraint with the principal motivation being nonviolence, or freedom from causing harm. It has been variously described as virtue, right conduct, morality, moral discipline and precept.

Upāsaka and Upāsikā followers of Buddhism; not monks or nuns

Upāsaka (masculine) or Upāsikā (feminine) are from the Sanskrit and Pāli words for "attendant". This is the title of followers of Buddhism who are not monks, nuns, or novice monastics in a Buddhist order, and who undertake certain vows. In modern times they have a connotation of dedicated piety that is best suggested by terms such as "lay devotee" or "devout lay follower".

Contents

Undertaking the five precepts is part of both lay Buddhist initiation and regular lay Buddhist devotional practices. They are not formulated as imperatives, but as training rules that lay people undertake voluntarily to facilitate practice. [2]

Role in Buddhist doctrine

Śīla (Sanskrit; Pali : sīla) is used to refer to Buddhist precepts, [3] including the five. [1] But the word also refers to the virtue and morality which lies at the foundation of the spiritual path to enlightenment, which is the first of the three forms of training on the path. Thus, the precepts are rules or guidelines to develop mind and character to make progress on the path to enlightenment. [1] The five precepts are part of the right speech, action and livelihood aspects of the eight-fold path, the core teaching of Buddhism. [4] [1] The five precepts also form the basis of the eight precepts, which are a stricter level of precepts for laypeople, to some extent similar to monastic precepts. [1]

History

The five precepts were part of early Buddhism and are common to nearly all schools of Buddhism. [5] Sometimes the five precepts were adapted in difficult circumstances. E.g. the Chinese Buddhist monk Wŏn'gwang developed a new interpretation of the five precepts, in which killing of certain people was allowed, and which included gratitude to parents and loyalty to authorities. [6]

Early Buddhism

The term Early Buddhism can refer to two distinct periods, both of which are covered in a separate article:

Formulas

In Pāli tradition

The following are the five precepts, [7] rendered in English and Pāli: [8] [9] [10]

1.I undertake the training rule to abstain from killing.Pāṇātipātā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.
2.I undertake the training rule to abstain from taking what is not given.Adinnādānā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.
3.I undertake the training rule to avoid sexual misconduct.Kāmesumicchācāra veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.
4.I undertake the training rule to abstain from false speech.Musāvādā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.
5.I undertake the precept to refrain from intoxicating drinks and drugs which lead to carelessness.Surāmerayamajjapamādaṭṭhānā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.

In the fifth precept sura, meraya and majja are kinds of alcoholic beverages. In some modern translations, Surāmerayamajjapamādaṭṭhānā, is rendered more broadly, variously, as, intoxicants, liquor and drugs, etc. The monastic discipline allows the use of alcohol when taken as part of medicinal treatments. [11]

Vinaya regulatory framework for the sangha based on the Vinaya Pitaka

The Vinaya is the regulatory framework for the sangha or monastic community of Buddhism based on the canonical texts called the Vinaya Pitaka. The teachings of the Gautama Buddha can be divided into two broad categories: Dharma "doctrine" and Vinaya "discipline".

In Chinese Mahāyāna tradition

The format of the ceremony for taking the precepts occurs several times in the Chinese texts, in slightly different forms, [12] [13] [14] and each temple or tradition has different ordination ceremonies.

One ceremonial version of the precepts can be found in the Treatise on Taking Refuge and the Precepts (simplified Chinese :归戒要集; traditional Chinese :歸戒要集; pinyin :Guījiè Yāojí).

  1. As all Buddhas refrained from killing until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from killing until the end of my life.
  2. As all Buddhas refrained from stealing until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from stealing until the end of my life.
  3. As all Buddhas refrained from sexual misconduct until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from sexual misconduct until the end of my life.
  4. As all Buddhas refrained from false speech until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from false speech until the end of my life.
  5. As all Buddhas refrained from alcohol until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from alcohol until the end of my life.

The same treatise outlines the option of undertaking fewer than all five precepts, [15] though nearly all modern ceremonies involve undertaking all five precepts.[ citation needed ] Some modern teachers, such as the Taiwanese teacher Yin-Shun, have used simplified formulas for the five precepts. [16]

Textual analysis

Buddhist scriptures explain the five precepts as the minimal standards of Buddhist morality. [17] They are regarded as means to building good character, or as an expression of such character. The texts also describe the precepts as ways for devotees to avoid harm to themselves and others. [18] In the Pāli Canon, the five precepts are described as gifts toward oneself and others. [19] Moreover, the Buddha mentions the consequences of breaking the precepts. [20] [21] The precepts are normative rules, but are usually not understood as commandments enforced by a moral authority. [22] [23]

In the upholding or violation of the precepts, intention is crucial. In the Pāli scriptures, an example is mentioned of a person stealing an animal only to set it free, which was not seen as an offense of theft. [24] There are several virtues which are the principles behind the precepts, and are cultivated through them. [3] For example, the first precept is connected to non-harming (Pāli, Sanskrit : ahiṃsa). But the first precept is not motivated by a principle of preserving life, but rather by respect for dignity of life. [25] In the Pāli commentaries, a precept is understood to be violated when the person violating it finds the object of the transgression (e.g. things to be stolen), is aware of the violation, has the intention to violate it, does actually act on that intention, and does so successfully. [26]

The first precept prohibits the taking of life of a sentient being, and is violated when someone intentionally kills such a sentient being after having understood it to be sentient. [26] This includes taking the lives of animals, even small insects. Nevertheless, it has also been pointed out that the seriousness of taking life depends on the size, intelligence and the spiritual attainments of that living being. Killing a large animal is worse than killing a small animal (because it costs more effort); killing a spiritually accomplished master is regarded as more severe than the killing of another "more average" human being; and killing a human being is more severe than the killing an animal. But all killing is condemned. [27] [26]

The second precept prohibits theft, and involves the intention to steal what one perceives as not belonging to oneself ("what is not given") and acting successfully upon that intention. The severity of the act of theft is judged by the worth of the owner and the worth of that which is stolen. Underhand dealings are also included in theft. [26] The third precept involves bad sexual behavior against women that are "protected", "claimed" or "acquired". The transgression is regarded as more severe if the other person is a good person. The fourth precept involves falsehood spoken or committed to by action, which is considered more serious if the falsehood is motivated by a serious ulterior motive (rather than, for example, spoken as a joke). [28]

Upholding the precepts is sometimes distinguished in three levels: to uphold them without having formally undertaken them, to uphold them formally, willing to sacrifice our own life for it, and finally, to spontaneously uphold them. [29] The latter refers to enlightened disciples of the Buddha, who are understood to be morally incapable of violating the first four precepts. [30] Even the thought of violation does not come to such disciples. [29]

In practice

The first precept

Lay followers often undertake these training rules in the same ceremony as they take the refuges. [1] In Mahāyāna schools, a lay practitioner who has taken the precepts is called an upāsaka or upāsikā (layman or laywoman).[ citation needed ] In Theravāda Buddhism, any lay follower is in theory called an upāsaka or upāsikā; in practice, everyone is expected to take the precepts. Additionally, traditional Theravāda lay devotional practice (Pali : pūja) includes daily rituals taking refuge and undertaking to observe the five precepts. Thus, the five precepts are at the core of Buddhist morality. Nevertheless, Buddhists do not all follow them with the same strictness. [7] Devotees who have just started keeping the precepts, will typically have to exercise considerable restraint. When they become used to the precepts, they start to embody them more naturally. [31]

A 1966 survey in Cambodia showed that Buddhists considered the first precepts the most important. [7] In some traditional communities, such as in Kandal Province in Cambodia, it was uncommon for Buddhists to slaughter animals, to the extent that meat had to be bought from not-Buddhists. [7] The prohibition on killing has motivated early Buddhists to form a stance against animal sacrifice, a common ritual practice in ancient India. It did, at least according to the Pāli Canon, not lead them to adopt a vegetarian lifestyle, however. Indeed, in several Pāli texts vegetarianism is described as irrelevant in the spiritual purification of the mind. There are prohibitions on certain types of meat, however, especially those which are condemned by society. The idea of abstaining from killing animal life has also led to a prohibition on professions that involve trade in flesh or living beings, but not to a full prohibition of all agriculture that involves cattle. [32] In modern times, however, referring to the law of supply and demand, some Theravādin Buddhists have attempted to promote vegetarianism as part of the five precepts. [23]

Other precepts

The second precept includes different ways of stealing and fraud. Borrowing without permission is sometimes also included. The third precept is interpreted as harming another by using sensuality in the wrong way. It involves engaging with inappropriate partners, but also respecting one's commitment to a relationship. [23] In modern times, adherence to the precepts among Buddhists is less strict than it traditionally was. This is especially true for the third precept. For example, in Cambodia in the 1990s and 2000s, standards with regard to sexual restraint were greatly relaxed. [33] The fourth precept includes avoidance of lying and harmful speech. [34] Some practitioners view it as refraining from not just lying, but also idle chat and gossip.[ citation needed ] As for the fifth precept, this is regarded as important, because drinking alcohol is condemned for the lack of self-control it leads to. [24] Nevertheless, in practice it is often disregarded. [35]

At the social and institutional level

Several modern teachers have written about the five precepts in a wider scope, with regard to social and institutional relations. In these perspectives, mass production of weapons or spreading untruth through media and education also violate the precepts. [36]

Revival movements

Some Buddhist movements and communities have tried to go against the trend of less strict adherence of the precepts. In Cambodia, a millenarian movement led by Chan Yipon promoted the revival of the five precepts. [33] And in the 2010s, the Supreme Sangha Council in Thailand ran a nationwide program called "The Villages Practicing the Five Precepts", aiming to encourage keeping the precepts, with an extensive classification and reward system. [37] [38] On a similar note, human rights organizations in Southeast Asia have attempted to advocate respect for human rights by referring to the five precepts as a guiding principle. [39]

Implications for theory of ethics

Bioethicist Damien Keown has observed that the five precepts are regarded as rules that cannot be violated, and therefore may indicate a deontological perspective in Buddhist ethics. [40] On the other hand, he has suggested virtue ethics could apply as well. [41] Philosopher William Edelglass points out that the precepts are based on virtues. [3]

See also

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Getz, Daniel A. (2004). "Precepts" (PDF). In Buswell, Robert E. Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Macmillan Reference USA, Thomson Gale. p. 673. ISBN   0-02-865720-9.
  2. McFarlane, Stewart (2001). Harvey, Peter, ed. Buddhism. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 187.
  3. 1 2 3 Edelglass 2013, p. 479.
  4. Powers 2013, āryāṣtāṅga-mārga.
  5. Keown 2003, p. 210.
  6. Hee-Sung Keel (2004). "Korea" (PDF). In Buswell, Robert E. Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Macmillan Reference USA, Thomson Gale. p. 431. ISBN   0-02-865720-9.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Ledgerwood 2008, p. 152.
  8. "Access to Insight: the Panca Sila (with Pali)" . Retrieved 2011-03-14.
  9. "Buddhist Ethics". buddhanet. Retrieved December 6, 2013.
  10. Elgiriye Indaratana (2002), p. 2.
  11. Horner, I.B. (1969). The Book of the discipline. (Vinaya-Piṭaka). Sacred books of the Buddhists. 13. Luzac. pp. 385–6.
  12. "CBETA T18 No. 916". Cbeta.org. Archived from the original on 2012-07-31. Retrieved 2012-12-10.
  13. "CBETA T24 No. 1488". Cbeta.org. 2008-08-30. Archived from the original on 2012-07-31. Retrieved 2012-12-10.
  14. "CBETA X60 No. 1129¡mÂk§Ùn¶°¡n¨÷3". Cbeta.org. 2008-08-30. Archived from the original on 2012-07-31. Retrieved 2012-12-10.
  15. starting on line 0682c05(07) Archived 2008-11-23 at the Wayback Machine .
  16. Yin-Shun, Venerable (1998). Wing H. Yeung, M.D., ed. The Way to Buddhahood: Instructions from a Modern Chinese Master. Translated by Wing H. Yeung. Wisdom Publications. pp. 86–87. ISBN   0-231-11286-6.
  17. Gowans, Christopher W. (2013). "Ethical Thought in Indian Buddhism" (PDF). In Emmanuel, Steven M. A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. p. 440. ISBN   978-0-470-65877-2.
  18. MacKenzie 2017, p. 2.
  19. "Abhisanda Sutta" [Rewards]. Translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight. 1997. AN 8.39. Retrieved 2011-03-14.
  20. AN 8.40 (Thanissaro, 1997c).
  21. AN 4.111 "Kesi Sutta: To Kesi the Horsetrainer" (Thanissaro, 1997)
  22. Keown 2003, p. 268.
  23. 1 2 3 Meadow 2006, p. 88.
  24. 1 2 Mcdermott 1989, p. 275.
  25. Keown 2013, p. 616.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Leaman 2000, p. 139.
  27. Mcdermott 1989, pp. 271–2.
  28. Leaman 2000, p. 140.
  29. 1 2 Leaman 2000, p. 141.
  30. Keown 2003, p. 1.
  31. MacKenzie 2017, p. 10.
  32. Mcdermott 1989, pp. 273–4, 276.
  33. 1 2 Ledgerwood 2008, p. 153.
  34. Powers 2013, pañca-śīla.
  35. Neumaier, Eva (2006). Riggs, Thomas, ed. Buddhism: Māhayāna Buddhism. Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices. Thomson Gale. p. 78. ISBN   0-7876-9390-1.
  36. Queen, Christopher S. (2013). "Socially Engaged Buddhism: Emerging Patterns of Theory and Practice" (PDF). In Emmanuel, Steven M. A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. p. 532. ISBN   978-0-470-65877-2.
  37. สมเด็จวัดปากน้ำชงหมูบ้านรักษาศีล 5 ให้อปท.ชวนประชาชนยึดปฎิบัติLock-red-alt.svg [Wat Paknam's Somdet proposes the Five Precept Village for local administrators to persuade the public to practice]. Khao Sod (in Thai). Matichon Publishing. 15 October 2013. p. 31. Retrieved 18 January 2017 via Matichon E-library.
  38. 39 ล้านคนร่วมหมู่บ้านศีล 5 สมเด็จพระมหารัชมังคลาจารย์ ย้ำทำต่อเนื่อง [39 million people have joined Villages Practicing Five Precepts, Somdet Phra Maharatchamangalacharn affirms it should be continued]. Thai Rath (in Thai). Wacharapol. 11 March 2017. Archived from the original on 21 November 2017.
  39. Ledgerwood 2008, p. 154.
  40. Keown 2013, p. 618.
  41. Edelglass 2013, p. 481.

Related Research Articles

Noble Eightfold Path one of the principal teachings of the Buddha

The Noble Eightfold Path is an early summary of the path of Buddhist practices leading to liberation from samsara, the painful cycle of rebirth.

Theravada Branch of Buddhism

Theravāda is the most ancient branch of extant Buddhism today, and the one that preserved their version of the teachings of Gautama Buddha in the Pāli Canon. The Pāli Canon is the only complete Buddhist canon which survives in a classical Indian language, Pāli, which serves as both sacred language and lingua franca of Theravāda Buddhism. For more than a millennium, Theravāda has focused on preserving the dhamma as preserved in its texts, and it tends to be very conservative with regard to matters of doctrine and monastic discipline. Since the 19th century, meditation practice has been re-introduced, and has become popular with a lay audience, both in traditional Theravada countries and in the west.

<i>Anatta</i> Non-self, a key concept in Buddhism

In Buddhism, the term anattā (Pali) or anātman (Sanskrit) refers to the doctrine of "non-self", that there is no unchanging, permanent self, soul or essence in living beings. It is one of the seven beneficial perceptions in Buddhism, and along with dukkha (suffering) and anicca (impermanence), it is one of three Right Understandings about the three marks of existence.

Rebirth (Buddhism) A being is born again into one of many realms of existence after physical death, a doctrine in Buddhism

Rebirth in Buddhism refers to its teaching that the actions of a person lead to a new existence after death, in endless cycles called saṃsāra. This cycle is considered to be dukkha, unsatisfactory and painful. The cycle stops only if liberation is achieved by insight and the extinguishing of desire. Rebirth is one of the foundational doctrines of Buddhism, along with Karma, nirvana and moksha.

Refuge (Buddhism) Religious concept in Buddhism

Buddhists take refuge in the Three Jewels or Triple Gem.

Buddhist councils

Since the death of the historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, Buddhist monastic communities have periodically convened to settle doctrinal and disciplinary disputes and to revise and correct the contents of the sutras. These gatherings, referred to by historians as 'Buddhist councils', are recorded in the Buddhist sutras as having begun immediately following the death of the Buddha and have continued into the modern era.

Pratimokṣa collection of rules for Buddhist nuns and monks

The Pratimokṣa is a list of rules governing the behaviour of Buddhist monastics. Prati means "towards" and mokṣa means "liberation" from cyclic existence (saṃsāra).

Buddhism World religion, founded by the Buddha

Buddhism is the world's fourth-largest religion with over 520 million followers, or over 7% of the global population, known as Buddhists. Buddhism encompasses a variety of traditions, beliefs and spiritual practices largely based on original teachings attributed to the Buddha and resulting interpreted philosophies. Buddhism originated in ancient India as a Sramana tradition sometime between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE, spreading through much of Asia. Two major extant branches of Buddhism are generally recognized by scholars: Theravada and Mahayana.

Merit (Buddhism)

Merit is a concept considered fundamental to Buddhist ethics. It is a beneficial and protective force which accumulates as a result of good deeds, acts, or thoughts. Merit-making is important to Buddhist practice: merit brings good and agreeable results, determines the quality of the next life and contributes to a person's growth towards enlightenment. In addition, merit is also shared with a deceased loved one, in order to help the deceased in their new existence. Despite modernization, merit-making remains essential in traditional Buddhist countries and has had a significant impact on the rural economies in these countries.

In Buddhism, the eight precepts is a list of precepts that are observed by lay devotees on observance days and festivals. They include general precepts such as refraining from killing, but also more specific ones, such as abstaining from cosmetics. Probably based on pre-Buddhist brahmanical practices, the eight precepts are often upheld on the Buddhist observance days, and in such context called the uposatha vows or one-day precepts. They are considered to support meditation practice, and are often observed when staying in monasteries and temples. In some periods and places, such as in 7th–10th-century China, the precepts were widely observed. In modern times, there have been revival movements and important political figures that have observed them continuously.

Brahmā (Buddhism) deva and heavenly king in Buddhism; lord of the heavenly realm Brahmaloka; not regarded as a creator deity (unlike the deity of the same name in Hinduism)

Brahmā is a leading god (deva) and heavenly king in Buddhism. He was adopted from other Indian religions such as Hinduism that considered him a protector of teachings (dharmapala), and he is never depicted in early Buddhist texts as a creator god. In Buddhist tradition, it was the deity Brahma Sahampati who appeared before the Buddha and urged him to teach, once the Buddha attained enlightenment but was unsure if he should teach his insights to anyone.

In English translations of Buddhist texts, householder denotes a variety of terms. Most broadly, it refers to any layperson, and most narrowly, to a wealthy and prestigious familial patriarch. In contemporary Buddhist communities, householder is often used synonymously with laity, or non-monastics.

Uposatha Buddhist day of observance

The Uposatha is a Buddhist day of observance, in existence from the Buddha's time, and still being kept today in Buddhist countries. The Buddha taught that the Uposatha day is for "the cleansing of the defiled mind," resulting in inner calm and joy. On this day, both lay and ordained members of the sangha intensify their practice, deepen their knowledge and express communal commitment through millennia-old acts of lay-monastic reciprocity. On these days, the lay followers make a conscious effort to keep the Five Precepts or the eight precepts. It is a day for practicing the Buddha's teachings and meditation.

Transfer of merit is a standard part of Buddhist spiritual discipline where the practitioner's religious merit, resulting from good deeds, is transferred to deceased relatives, to deities, or to all sentient beings. Such transfer is done mentally, and it is believed that the recipient can often receive this merit, if they rejoice in the meritorious acts of the person transferring. In Buddhism, merit transfer is seen as a better alternative than mourning.

Skandha

Skandhas (Sanskrit) or khandhas (Pāḷi) means "heaps, aggregates, collections, groupings". In Buddhism, it refers to the five aggregates of clinging (Pancha-upadanakkhanda), the five bodily and mental factors that take part in the rise of craving and clinging. They are also explained as the five factors that constitute and explain a sentient being’s person and personality, but this is a later interpretation in response to sarvastivadin essentialism.

Arhat enlightened being in Buddhism, either having attained the final stage of enlightment (Theravada) or not yet having reached Buddhahood (Mahayana)

Theravada Buddhism defines arhat as one who has gained insight into the true nature of existence and has achieved nirvana. Other Buddhist traditions have used the term for people far advanced along the path of Enlightenment, but who may not have reached full Buddhahood.

Buddhism and sexuality The relation between Buddhist theory and practice and sexuality

In the Buddha's first discourse, he identifies craving (tanha) as the cause of suffering (dukkha). He then identifies three objects of craving: the craving for existence; the craving for non-existence and the craving for sense pleasures (kama). Kama is identified as one of five hindrances to the attainment of jhana according to the Buddha's teaching. Throughout the Sutta Pitaka the Buddha often compares sexual pleasure to arrows or darts. So in the Kama Sutta from the Sutta Nipata the Buddha explains that craving sexual pleasure is a cause of suffering.

If one, longing for sensual pleasure, achieves it, yes, he's enraptured at heart. The mortal gets what he wants. But if for that person — longing, desiring — the pleasures diminish, he's shattered, as if shot with an arrow.

References