LGBTQ rights in Singapore

Last updated

LGBTQ rights in Singapore
Singapore on the globe (Southeast Asia centered) zoom.svg
Singapore
Status Legal [lower-alpha 1]
Gender identity Legal [lower-alpha 2]
Military Yes
Discrimination protections Protections from incitement of religiously motivated anti-LGBT harassment and violence [2]
Family rights
Recognition of relationships No
Adoption Limited

The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in Singapore have evolved over the decades. Same-sex sexual activity is legal for both males and females; for men it was officially legalised in 2022 after being de facto decriminalised since 2007, and for women it was always legal. Prior to 2022, same-sex sexual activity between males was de jure illegal under the British colonial-era Section 377A of the Penal Code. The law had been de facto unenforced for decades. In February 2022, the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court reaffirmed that 377A cannot be used to prosecute men for having sex with other men, [3] [4] [5] and that it is "unenforceable in its entirety". [5] Transgender rights in the country are also progressive in the region, which included Singapore being the first country in Asia to legalise sex reassignment surgery in 1973.

Contents

On 21 August 2022, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that the Government intended to repeal Section 377A of the Penal Code, effectively ending criminalisation both de facto and de jure. [6] [7] [8] On 22 August 2022, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam added that the Constitution would be amended to protect Parliament's right to define marriage instead of the judiciary, which is the Supreme Court of Singapore, leaving open the possibility for Parliament to legalise same-sex marriages or civil unions through a simple majority. [9] On 29 November 2022, the repeal of Section 377A of the Penal Code was officially passed in Parliament. [10]

Same-sex marriages are currently not recognised in the country, including the adoption of children by same-sex couples, although a gay Singaporean man with a male partner in 2018 won a landmark appeal to adopt a child that he had fathered through a surrogate. [11] In 2018, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung reassured the LGBTQ community that discrimination against the LGBTQ community at work, in housing and education will not be tolerated. [12] Since 2019, protections against anti-gay violence and aggravated discrimination were also put into legislation; Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam stated that "LGBTQ persons, non-LGBTQ persons, we are all equal. We are not any lesser by reason of our sexual orientation." [2] [13]

While Singaporean society is generally regarded as conservative, LGBTQ pride festivals such as Pink Dot have taken place every year since 2009 with increasing attendance amounting to the tens of thousands. In line with worldwide trends, [14] attitudes towards members of the LGBTQ community among Singaporeans are slowly changing and becoming more socially accepting and tolerant. [15]

Legality of same-sex sexual activity

British Whig politician Thomas Macaulay chaired a commission to criminalise sodomy in various British colonies. Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron Macaulay by Sir Francis Grant.jpg
British Whig politician Thomas Macaulay chaired a commission to criminalise sodomy in various British colonies.

Singapore law inherited from the British Empire in 1871 [16] : 34  prohibited sodomy regardless of sex. As such, heterosexual and homosexual anal or oral sex was illegal. In 2007, such sexual activity was legalised except for sex between men. [17] [18] The punishment was two years' imprisonment.

Back in 2018, Attorney-General Lucien Wong declared that he still had the legal power to prosecute under Singapore's Section 377A. This statement was made amid public debate over the law and in response to opinions of former attorneys-general that the public prosecutor had, in effect, been limited from pursuit of such cases. Wong said that while "the public prosecutor did not pursue cases between consenting adults and in private places as it was not in the public interest" an attorney-general could direct that such a prosecution be mounted, "if reports are lodged with police, particularly in relation to minors". The statement was made prior to the ruling by the Singapore Court of Appeals that the section was unenforceable as a proscription of same-sex sexual activity. Public indecency and protection of minors were the only cases pursued under the section from 2007, even prior to the ruling. [19] [20]

In June 2019, at the Smart Nation Summit, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong reiterated that Singapore would keep Section 377A "for some time" saying, "Whatever your sexual orientation is, you're welcome to come and work in Singapore... You know our rules in Singapore. It is the way this society is: We are not like San Francisco, neither are we like some countries in the Middle East. [We are] something in between, it is the way the society is." [21] [22]

While Singapore courts ruled in 2022 that section 377A was entirely unenforceable as regards private consensual same-sex sexual activity, police are able to act on reports of public indecency (public acts by persons of any gender) from the community. Prosecution under this section of any matters involving minors is also still possible. [3] All recent prosecutions under the section—between 2007 and 2013—were incidences of these types. [23] [4] [5] [19] [20]

On 21 August 2022, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced at the National Day Rally that the Government intended to repeal Section 377A, noting that there would be significant risk of the law being struck down in future legal challenges "on the grounds that it breaches Article 12 of the Constitution – the Equal Protection provision". [6] [8] [7] Lee added that the repeal would be deliberated through Parliament. [8] After a two-day debate on 28 and 29 November, Section 377A was officially repealed in Parliament.

Statutes

After an exhaustive Penal Code review in 2007, oral and anal sex were legalised between opposite-sex persons and between women. The changes meant that oral and anal sex between consenting heterosexual and female homosexual adults were no longer offences. However, Section 377A, which deals with these sexual acts, continued to criminalise them between consenting men. Despite this, the section has not been enforced since at least 2007. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong stated amid the debates on the changes to the section that the law would not be proactively enforced. [3] The parliamentary debates and the prime minister's statement played a role in the 2022 ruling of the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court that the law was unenforceable. [17] [18] [3]

In his concluding speech on the debate over the partial repeal of Section 377A, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told MPs before the vote that "Singapore is basically a conservative society... The family is the basic building block of this society. And by a family in Singapore, we mean one man, one woman, marrying, having children and bringing up children within that framework of a stable family unit." [24]

Section 377A ("Outrages on decency")

Section 377A states that: "Any male person who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years." [25] According to the United States Department of State, [26] and Human Dignity Trust, [27] the last attempted prosecution for consensual same-sex sexual activity occurred in 2010. Between 2007 and 2013, all nine convictions under 377A provisions, [23] involved minors or public acts of gross indecency. [28]

Section 354 of the Penal Code ("Outrage of Modesty")

Section 354 provides that if any person uses criminal force on any person intending to outrage, or knowing it would be likely to outrage, the modesty of that person, he shall be imprisoned for a maximum of two years, or with fine, or with caning, or with any two of such punishments. Crimes charged under section 354 require some physical contact involved. [29]

Section 294 of the Penal Code

If the victim of an entrapment operation uses a symbolic gesture to signal intention to have sexual activity with the police decoy, he can be tried under Section 294 of the Penal Code, which covers the commission of any obscene act in any public place to the annoyance of others, subject to a maximum of three months imprisonment, a fine, or both. [30]

Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act

According to documentation by National University of Singapore sociologist Laurence Leong Wai Teng, from 1990 to 1994, there were 11 cases where gay men were charged for soliciting. They were fined between $200 and $500. [31]

Efforts to repeal 377A

Prior to 2022, human rights activists had called for the repeal of Section 377A, arguing that it infringes on privacy, the right to life and personal liberty, the latter two of which are constitutionally protected. [32] In 2007, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) called for the repeal of Section 377A. [33]

In 2012, Tan Eng Hong was found in the company of another man, and was initially charged with Section 377A but later pled guilty to a lesser charge. Tan decided to pursue his case against Section 377A on the grounds that it was inconsistent with Articles 9, 12, and 14 of the Singapore Constitution. [34] These articles guarantee the right to life and personal liberty, and provide that all people are entitled to equal protection before the law. [35] In deciding whether an appeal of Tan's case could be heard in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal found that Section 377A may "arguably" violate the right to equality before law as offered in Article 12. The ruling however did not go into the merits of the case on technical grounds. [34] [36]

Tan's case was heard in the Supreme Court jointly with another appeal challenging Section 377A, and a ruling was given on 29 October 2014. The ruling upheld the country's ban on same-sex relations between consenting adult men. The court held that Section 377A does not violate Articles 9 and 12 of the Singapore Constitution. The applicant's attorney argued that Section 377A criminalises a group of people for an innate attribute, though the court concluded that "there is, at present, no definitive conclusion" on the "supposed immutability" of homosexuality. The court ultimately held that law reforms permitting private homosexual sex were a question for the Singapore Parliament to address. [23]

In September 2018, following the high-profile repeal of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code by the Supreme Court of India, more than 50,000 people, including a former attorney-general and several former diplomats, signed a petition called "READY4REPEAL" urging the repeal of Section 377A as part of a major penal code review. However, government officials at the time refused to do so. [37] Diplomat Tommy Koh and former Attorney-General Walter Woon have called on members of the LGBTQ community to challenge the law. [38]

Soon after the repeal of Section 377 in India in 2018, a Singaporean DJ, Johnson Ong Ming, filed a suit with the High Court arguing that Singapore's Section 377A is "in violation of human dignity". Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 377A of the Singapore Penal Code are effectively identical, as both were put in place by the British Empire, raising hopes in Singapore that the discriminatory law would be struck down as well. [32] Singapore's High Court gave the petitioner until 20 November to submit his arguments. [39] [40] [37]

In November 2018, LGBTQ rights activist Bryan Choong Chee Hong filed another case with the Supreme Court, arguing that Section 377A is "inconsistent" with portions of Singapore's Constitution, and "is therefore void". According to court documents, the petitioner argues that Section 377A is inconsistent with Article 9, Article 12, and Article 14 of the Constitution. [41] [42] [43] [44]

A third legal challenge was launched in September 2019 by Roy Tan Seng Kee, a retired medical doctor. Tan stated in a statement that, "by institutionalising discrimination, it alienates [LGBTQ people] from having a sense of belonging and purposeful place in our society, and prevents them from taking pride in Singapore's achievements." [45]

All three cases were dismissed by the High Court on 30 March 2020 in a closed-door judgement by Justice See Kee Oon. [46] [47] [48]

377A officially repealed

On 21 August 2022, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that the government would table a motion in Parliament to repeal Section 377A, effectively decriminalising male homosexual acts. On 20 October 2022 the government tabled the bill. [49] After a two-day debate, Section 377A of the Penal Code was officially repealed in Parliament on 29 November 2022. [10]

Recognition of same-sex relationships

Singapore currently does not recognise same-sex relationships in any form (such as marriage, civil unions or domestic partnerships). [50] In the National Day Rally for 2022, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that while section 377A will be repealed, the current heterosexual definition of marriage may be enshrined in the Constitution of Singapore. [6] [8] [7]

The announcement of possibly enshrining the current heterosexual definition of marriage in the constitution was met with some initial misinterpretations. On 22 August 2022, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam clarified that the Constitution will be amended to protect Parliament's right to define marriage, instead of the judiciary, which is the Supreme Court of Singapore, leaving open the possibility for Parliament to change the definition of marriage through a simple majority in the future, such as legalising same-sex marriages or civil unions. [9]

He clarified that the definition of marriage will not be enshrined in the Constitution, stating that "any political party or group that wants to push for same-sex marriage will be able to do so." – if they have a simple majority in Parliament. [9] Subsequently, on 20 October 2022 the government tabled a draft constitutional amendment, which was debated by the Parliament on 28 November 2022 along with a bill repealing Section 377A. [49] The amendment was passed on 29 November 2022. [10]

Due to this constitutional amendment, and the precedent set by the Women's Charter reading that marriage not between a woman and man is void, only heterosexual marriages are recognised.

Adoption and parenting

In December 2018, a gay Singaporean won the right to adopt his son who was fathered in the United States [51] [52] through a surrogate, in a landmark appeal. The Singapore High Court overturned a 2017 ruling in which a district judge had barred the man from legally adopting his son because the child was conceived through in vitro fertilization (which is only limited to heterosexual married couples) and brought to term through surrogacy, which is banned. In response, the Minister for Social and Family Development, Desmond Lee, announced in January 2019 that the government was seeking to strengthen Singapore's adoption laws to prevent more same-sex adoption cases. The Minister also stated that the government does not support "the formation of family units with children of homosexual parents through institutions and processes such as adoption". However, this statement has not yet been made into a law.

Children born out of wedlock are considered illegitimate under Singapore law and are not eligible for certain social benefits unless they are legally adopted. This has led to difficulties for same-sex couples seeking to start families, as they are unable to adopt children. Despite the challenges, Singapore has been at the forefront of discussions on LGBTQ+ rights in Asia, having made progress towards decriminalizing homosexuality and recognizing same-sex relationships.

The case of the gay Singaporean who won the right to adopt his son in 2018 was a significant milestone for LGBTQ+ rights [53] in the country. The court's decision to overturn the previous ruling was hailed as a victory for LGBTQ+ rights activists. However, the government's response to the case was less enthusiastic, sparking a renewed debate on the issue of same-sex adoption in Singapore. Advocates for LGBTQ+ rights argued that the government's stance was discriminatory and went against the principles of equality and non-discrimination. [54]

The lack of legal recognition for same-sex couples in Singapore has meant that they are unable to access many of the same benefits and rights as heterosexual couples, including healthcare benefits, inheritance rights, and social security benefits. Despite these challenges, the LGBTQ+ community in Singapore continues to push for greater recognition and acceptance. In recent years, there has been a growing acceptance of LGBTQ+ rights, with many businesses and organizations showing their support for the community.

Discrimination protections

In 2018, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung reassured the LGBTQ community that discrimination against LGBTQ community at work, in housing and education will not be tolerated. [12]

In 2019, the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act was amended to protect the LGBTQ community from religiously motivated violence. Legal action can be taken against a religious group or its members for urging violence against certain "target groups". The Explanatory Statement states: "The target group need not be confined to persons who practise a certain religion. The target group may be made up of atheists, individuals from a specific racial community, who share a similar sexual orientation, or have a certain nationality or descent like foreign workers or new citizens." [2]

In 2022, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam confirmed that now LGBTQ people were protected against threats or acts of violence. [13]

Military service

Prior to 2003, homosexuals were barred from being employed in "sensitive positions" within the Singapore Civil Service. [55] During the 20th century, some conscripts in National Service were encouraged to attend conversion therapy. In the past, some Singaporean conscripts who openly declared their homosexuality may also be excluded from officer training, including being refused security clearances needed to perform higher roles in the army. [56]

Conversion therapy

In January 2006, the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS) granted S$100,000 (US$61,500) to Liberty League, an organisation affiliated with the "ex-gay" movement, to promote conversion therapy. The organization says it "promotes gender and sexual health for the individual, family and society". [57] However, due to pressure from gay rights activists, Liberty League returned this grant to the ministry, and the organisation has been defunct since 2014. [58]

In May 2020, then-Minister for Health Gan Kim Yong indicated the government's position against conversion therapy in a written reply to a question from Nominated Member of Parliament Anthea Ong. The reply reads, "(The Ministry of Health) expects doctors and other healthcare professionals to practice according to evidence-based best practice and clinical ethics, and to consider and respect patients' preferences and circumstances (including sexual orientation) when providing care... members of the public can submit a formal complaint to the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) if a doctor is acting unethically or providing inappropriate treatment." [59] Nevertheless, he added in a separate statement that the Ministry of Health had not received any such complaint from self-declared LGBTQ patients in the past three years. [60]

Living conditions

The LGBTQ community converging at Hong Lim Park in Singapore for Pink Dot SG in 2014 Hong Lim Park- Pink Dot 2014 Singapore.jpg
The LGBTQ community converging at Hong Lim Park in Singapore for Pink Dot SG in 2014

In 2014, Singaporean government representatives have spoken positively about LGBTQ Singaporean citizens at a United Nations anti-discrimination committee, stating that "homosexuals are free to lead their lives and pursue their social activities. Gay groups have held public discussions and published websites, and there are films and plays on gay themes and gay bars and clubs in Singapore." [23]

Media

The Media Development Authority (MDA), a statutory board of the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI), currently limits the "promotion or glamorization of the homosexual lifestyle" on television and the radio. Examples include issuing higher age ratings (e.g. NC16, M18 or R21) for television shows or films that depicts sexual activity between persons of the same gender. [61]

In July 2019, Singaporean rapper Joshua Su, better known as The G3sha, came out as gay in a new song titled "I'm OK" that highlights his childhood, the homophobia he faced, and coming to terms with his sexuality. [62] [63] Days later, he pulled out of a TEDx radio talk in protest after claiming that he was censored and asked not to make "sensitive" comments about his sexuality. [64]

Gender neutral toilets

Yale-NUS College and Tembusu College of the National University of Singapore have gender neutral toilets for their students. [65] [66]

Temporary gender neutral toilet in Suntec Singapore Convention and Exhibition Centre for Wikimania 2023 Suntec Singapore Convention and Exhibition Centre temporary gender neutral toilet for Wikimania 2023.jpg
Temporary gender neutral toilet in Suntec Singapore Convention and Exhibition Centre for Wikimania 2023

During Wikimania 2023 which was held at the Suntec Singapore Convention and Exhibition Centre, from 16 to 19 August 2023, a female toilet was temporarily converted to a gender neutral toilet. [67] [68] The toilet attracted attention from the public when a picture was first posted on Instagram and subsequently on other forums. [67] [68] Facebook group "We Are Against Pinkdot in Singapore" threatened a boycott against Suntec with users seeking petitions against the implementation of the gender neutral toilet. [68] PinkDot SG and non-profit group Oogachaga responded that gender neutral toilets are a complement to gendered toilets and can co-exist together. [68] They do not seek to replace traditional gendered toilets. [68]

Public opinion

2000s

A 2005 poll by the Nanyang Technological University found that 69% of Singaporeans viewed homosexuality negatively, whilst 23% positively. In 2010, these numbers had changed to 64.5% negatively and 25% positively. [15]

2010s

According to 2013 polling by the Institute of Policy Studies, 78% of Singaporeans opposed same-sex marriage. [69]

A 2018 opinion poll by Ipsos found that 55% of Singaporeans supported Section 377A. On the other hand, a third of Singaporeans declared themselves more accepting of same-sex relationships and human rights than five years prior. [70]

In 2019, a poll conducted by YouGov with 1,033 respondents showed that about one-third (34%) of Singaporeans backed same-sex partnerships, while 43% opposed their legalization, and the remaining 23% were uncertain. Support was more notable among younger respondents: 50% of people aged 18 to 34 supported civil partnerships and 20% were opposed. In contrast, only 22% of those aged 55 and over supported. 41% of university degree holders agreed with the legalisation of same-sex partnerships, whereas only 26% of respondents without a university degree were in favour. Of those who considered themselves "very much" religious, only 23% supported civil partnerships. 51% of people who considered themselves "not at all" religious expressed support. Apart from irreligious people, majority support for same-sex partnerships was also found in respondents who identified as LGBTQ (71% against 22%) and those who personally knew a person in a same-sex relationship (52% against 33%). [71] [72] [73] [74]

A survey conducted by the Institute of Policy Studies between August 2018 and January 2019 revealed that Singaporean society was still largely conservative but becoming more liberal on LGBTQ rights. The survey showed that more than 20% of people said that sexual relations between adults of the same sex were not wrong at all or not wrong most of the time, a rise of about 10% from 2013. Around 27% felt the same way about same-sex marriage (up from 15% in 2013) and 30% did so about same-sex couples adopting a child (up from 24% in 2013). [75] [76]

A 2019 poll conducted by the Institute of Policy Studies found that opposition to same-sex marriage in Singapore had fallen to 60%, down from 74% in 2013. The poll also found that nearly six in ten Singaporeans aged between 18 and 25 believed same-sex marriage is not wrong. [77]

In June 2019, an online survey conducted by Yahoo Singapore asked 887 Singaporeans how they would react to a number of LGBT-related situations. When asked about an LGBTQ family member coming out, 53% of the respondents said they would react negatively: 14% expressed a "strongly negative" response, while 39% reported a "somewhat negative" reaction. When asked about a colleague coming out, 53% reported a positive reaction, while 46% reported a negative reaction. When asked about the marriage of Li Huanwu—the grandson of Singapore's founding prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew—to his partner, Heng Yirui, 54% reacted negatively to the marriage. Meanwhile, 46% reacted positively to it. When asked about Pink Dot SG, 55% of respondents said that they strongly or somewhat support Pink Dot Singapore, but the remaining 45% opposed it. 80% of Singaporeans agreed that LGBTQ people face discrimination. [78] [79] [80]

In June 2019, an online survey conducted by Blackbox Research revealed that 56% of Singaporeans were opposed to other countries following Taiwan's example in legalising same-sex marriage, while 44% answered "yes". When asked on how they felt that more than 300 same-sex couples were married in Taiwan the first week after the new law was passed, about 49% of those surveyed felt positive about the statement, with 14% feeling "strongly positive" and 35% feeling "somewhat positive". Conversely, 51% responded negatively to this, 20% felt "strongly negative" and 31% were "somewhat negative". The respondents were also asked about how they felt concerning the decriminalisation of homosexuality in Bhutan. About 55% of respondents felt positive, with 15% feeling "strongly positive" and 40% were "somewhat positive". Conversely, about 44% responded negatively, 11% felt "strongly negative" and 33% felt "somewhat negative". [81]

2020s

A TODAY Youth Survey in 2021 found high acceptance of LGBTQ people among Singaporean youth: "80% were willing to work with LGBTQ people (6% disagreed), 75% were willing to form close friendships with them (10% disagreed) and 58% were willing to accept LGBTQ family members (18% disagreed)." [82]

In 2022, an Ipsos survey found that only 44% of Singapore residents support the retention of section 377A. Furthermore, 20% oppose the law its entirety, up from 12% in the last 2018 survey. For the remaining 36%, 32% said they neither support nor oppose the law, while 4% preferred not to say. [83]

A poll by Pew Research Center in 2023 found that support for same-sex marriage in Singapore has risen to 45% and opposition has fallen to 51%. 53% of Buddhists, 60% of Hindus and 62% of irreligious people support same-sex marriage. [84]

An Ipsos poll in June 2024 found an increase in support for gay rights with 54% of Singaporean agreed that same-sex couples should be able to get married or have legal recognition (25% disagreed, 21% were neutral) and 57% agreed that they should be able to adopt (30% disagreed, 13% were neutral). 73% agreed that LGBTQ people should be protected from discrimination. [85]

Demographics

In May 2019, a study by the National University of Singapore estimated that there were 210,000 men who have sex with men in Singapore. The study estimates were more than double the previous estimates of 90,000 MSM, and said they could be at risk of a concentrated epidemic of HIV. [86] [87]

Pink Dot

Pink Dot SG is an annual event that started in 2009 in support of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in Singapore. In recent years, record crowds of approximately 28,000 have attended the rally, with a heavy bent toward younger demographics. [88] On 29 June 2019, during the 11th Pink Dot, Lee Hsien Yang, the brother of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, as well as his wife and second son Li Huanwu and Li's husband, Heng Yirui, attended the event. [89] On 18 June 2022, People's Action Party (PAP) MP Henry Kwek attended the 14th Pink Dot. Kwek's attendance was the first time that a MP from the governing PAP has physically shown their support for the event. [90]

Summary table

LGB

AcceptabilityNotes
Legal same-sex sexual activity Yes check.svg Females always legal, males de facto since 2007, de jure since 2022.
Equal age of consent Yes check.svg Since 2022.
Anti-discrimination laws in employment only X mark.svg
Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services Yes check.svg [12]
Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (incl. indirect discrimination, hate speech) Yes check.svg Since 2019, specifically protection against incitement of anti-gay aggravated harassment and violence. [2] [13]
Same-sex marriages X mark.svg
Recognition of same-sex couples X mark.svg
Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples X mark.svg However, in 2018, a gay Singaporean man with a male partner won an appeal to adopt a child that he fathered through a surrogate.
Joint adoption by same-sex couples X mark.svg
Adoption by single people regardless of sexual orientation Yes check.svg
Conversion therapy banned X mark.svg
Gays, lesbians and bisexuals allowed to serve in the military Yes check.svg Since 2003.
Access to IVF for lesbians Yes check.svg Since 2022. [91]
Commercial surrogacy for gay male couples X mark.svg Illegal for all couples regardless of sexual orientation. [92]
MSMs allowed to donate blood X mark.svg

T

Transgender rights in:Right to change legal nameRight to change legal genderRight to access medical treatmentRight to marryMilitary service
Flag of Singapore.svg Singapore Yes check.svg Deed poll and statutory declaration available Yes check.svg Since 1973, first country in Asia to do so. [1] Yes check.svg Always legal Yes check.svg Since 1996, after an amendment was made to the Women's Charter Yes check.svg Since the 1990s [lower-alpha 3]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Homosexuality always legal for females, for males de facto since 2007, de jure since 2022.
  2. ↑ Gender-affirming surgery (also known as sex reassignment surgery) is legal and recognised. [1]
  3. ↑ See transgender people in Singapore#National service for more details.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ history in Singapore</span>

There is a long history of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender activity in Singapore. Male homosexuality was outlawed under British rule, despite being acknowledged among the local population. Following Japanese occupation during World War II and the country gaining independence, homosexuality and transvestism were visible as a street scene, and from the 1970s were catered for in some nightclubs. In that decade also, Singapore became a centre of gender-reassignment surgery.

Section 377A was a Singaporean law that criminalised sex between consenting adult males. It was introduced under British colonial rule in 1938 when it was added to the Penal Code by the colonial government. It remained a part of the Singapore body of law after the Penal Code review of 2007 which removed most of the other provisions in Section 377. It was subsequently repealed in its entirety in 2023.

LGBT art in Singapore, or queer art in Singapore, broadly refers to modern and contemporary visual art practices that draw on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender+ imagery and themes, addressing topics such as LGBT rights, history and culture in Singapore. Such queer art practices are often by Singaporean or Singapore-based visual artists and curators who identify as LGBT+ or queer.

Section 377 is a British colonial penal code that criminalized all sexual acts "against the order of nature". The law was used to prosecute people engaging in oral and anal sex along with homosexual activity. As per a Supreme Court Judgement since 2018, the Indian Penal Code Section 377 is used to convict non-consensual sexual activities among homosexuals with a minimum of ten years’ imprisonment extended to life imprisonment. It has been used to criminalize third gender people, such as the apwint in Myanmar. In 2018, then British Prime Minister Theresa May acknowledged how the legacies of such British colonial anti-sodomy laws continue to persist today in the form of discrimination, violence, and even death.

Homosexuality in India is socially permitted by most of the traditional native philosophies of the nation, and legal rights continue to be advanced in mainstream politics and regional politics. Homosexual cohabitation is also legally permitted and comes with some legal protections and rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Kenya</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Kenya face significant challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Sodomy is a felony per Section 162 of the Kenyan Penal Code, punishable by 21 years' imprisonment, and any sexual practices are a felony under section 165 of the same statute, punishable by five years' imprisonment. On 24 May 2019, the High Court of Kenya refused an order to declare sections 162 and 165 unconstitutional. The state does not recognise any relationships between persons of the same sex; same-sex marriage is banned under the Kenyan Constitution since 2010. There are no explicit protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Adoption is restricted to heterosexual couples only.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in the United Arab Emirates face discrimination and legal challenges. Homosexuality is illegal in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and under the federal criminal provisions, consensual same-sex sexual activity is punishable by imprisonment; extra-marital sexual activity between persons of different sexes is also illegal. In both cases, prosecution will only be brought if a husband or male guardian of one of the participants makes a criminal complaint. The penalty is a minimum of six months imprisonment; no maximum penalty is prescribed, and the court has full discretion to impose any sentence in accordance with the country's constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Singapore</span>

Since Singapore's independence in 1965, the human rights of Singaporeans have been set out in the Constitution of Singapore and include rights found in subsequent amendments and referendums. These rights have evolved through Singapore's history as a part of the Straits Settlements, its years under Japanese occupation, its position as a separate self-governing crown colony, and its present day status as a sovereign island country and city-state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Sri Lanka</span>

Article 365 of the Sri Lankan Penal Code, which dates from the time of colonial British Ceylon, criminalizes sexual acts deemed "against the order of nature". The Supreme Court of Sri Lanka has ruled favourably for decriminalization and has agreed that any imposition of penalties are incompatible with the current times, but does not have the authority to invalidate laws, acts, or governmental actions even if they are incompatible with a higher morality. A bill aimed at decriminalization was submitted to parliament in August 2022 has been given the support of the ruling government. Furthermore both major parties from across the political spectrum have generally expressed support for homosexuality.

Church of Our Saviour or COOS is a church in Queenstown, Singapore, which began as a mission in the 1950s along Alexandra Road and has since grown into a megachurch with a weekly attendance of approximately 4,500. While it is a parish within the mainline Anglican Diocese of Singapore, COOS is known for its contemporary worship services and charismatic practices like speaking in tongues, faith healing and deliverance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Zambia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Zambia face significant challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is illegal for both men and women in Zambia. Formerly a colony of the British Empire, Zambia inherited the laws and legal system of its colonial occupiers upon independence in 1964. Laws concerning homosexuality have largely remained unchanged since then, and homosexuality is covered by sodomy laws that also proscribe bestiality. Social attitudes toward LGBT people are mostly negative and coloured by perceptions that homosexuality is immoral and a form of insanity. However, in recent years, younger generations are beginning to show positive and open minded attitudes towards their LGBT peers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sodomy law</span> Laws criminalising certain sexual acts

A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law, but are typically understood and defined by many courts and jurisdictions to include any or all forms of sexual acts that are illegal, illicit, unlawful, unnatural and immoral. Sodomy typically includes anal sex, oral sex, manual sex, and bestiality. In practice, sodomy laws have rarely been enforced to target against sexual activities between individuals of the opposite sex, and have mostly been used to target against sexual activities between individuals of the same sex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Antigua and Barbuda</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Antigua and Barbuda may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ citizens.

Communist attitudes towards LGBTQ rights have evolved radically in the 21st century. In the 19th and 20th century, communist parties and Marxist–Leninist states varied on LGBTQ rights; some Western and Eastern parties were among the first political parties to support LGBTQ rights, while others, especially the Soviet Union and some of its Eastern Bloc members, harshly persecuted people of the LGBTQ community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pink Dot SG</span> Annual LGBTQ+ event in Singapore

Pink Dot SG, known endonymously as Pink Dot, is a pride event that has occurred annually since 2009 in support of the LGBTQ community in Singapore. Attendees of Pink Dot events gather to form a "pink dot" to show support for inclusiveness, diversity and the freedom to love in the country. Pink Dot events typically include concert performances and booths sponsored by organizations that support the LGBT community and cause in addition to the event's name-brand formation.

Singapore does not recognise same-sex marriages or civil unions. In 2022, the Parliament of Singapore passed a constitutional amendment giving itself "the power to define, regulate, protect and promote the institution of marriage".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Saint Kitts and Nevis</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Saint Kitts and Nevis face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. In 2022, Saint Kitts and Nevis rescinded its criminalization of homosexuality. However, the national penal code does not address discrimination or harassment on the account of sexual orientation or gender identity, nor does the law recognize same sex unions in any form, whether it be marriage or partnerships. Households headed by same-sex couples are also not eligible for any of the same rights given to opposite-sex married couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Faisal Manap</span> Singaporean politician

Muhamad Faisal bin Abdul Manap is a Singaporean politician. A member of the opposition Workers' Party (WP), he has been the Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Kaki Bukit division of Aljunied GRC since 2011 and has been serving as Vice-Chairman of the WP since 2016. He has been an advisor for Sengkang GRC since 2021.

<i>Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India</i> Indian LGBT Rights Case Law

Navtej Singh Johar &Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2018) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalised all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex.

Yang Tuck Yoong is a Singaporean pastor associated with the charismatic movement. He is the founder of Cornerstone Community Church.

References

  1. 1 2 Chan Meng Choo (2011). "First sex reassignment surgery". Singapore Infopedia. National Library Board. Archived from the original on 1 June 2019. Retrieved 1 June 2019.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Elangovan, Navene (14 October 2019). "New legislation protects LGBTQ community from religiously motivated violence but law is 'same for all'". Today. Singapore. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Lum, Selina (28 February 2022). "Court of Appeal rules Section 377A stays but cannot be used to prosecute men for having gay sex". The Straits Times. Singapore.
  4. 1 2 Lum, Selina (28 February 2022). "Section 377A stays on the books, but cannot be used to prosecute men for having gay sex, rules Court of Appeal". AsiaOne. Singapore. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 Tang, Louisa (28 February 2022). "Apex court dismisses challenges to Section 377A, says it's 'unenforceable' and poses no threat of prosecution". Today. Singapore. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
  6. 1 2 3 Yuen-C, Tham (21 August 2022). "NDR 2022: Govt will repeal Section 377A, decriminalise sex between men". The Straits Times. Singapore. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  7. 1 2 3 Sim, Dewey (21 August 2022). "Singapore to lift ban on gay sex, amend constitution to ban marriage equality". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  8. 1 2 3 4 "Singapore will decriminalize sex between men, prime minister says". Reuters. 21 August 2022. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  9. 1 2 3 Yuen-C, Tham (22 August 2022). "Section 377A: Constitution will be amended to protect Parliament's right to define marriage, says Shanmugam". The Straits Times. Singapore. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
  10. 1 2 3 Goh, Han Yan (29 November 2022). "Parliament repeals Section 377A, endorses amendments protecting definition of marriage". The Straits Times. Singapore. Retrieved 29 November 2022.
  11. ↑ Tan, Yvette (17 December 2018). "Gay Singaporean man wins landmark appeal to adopt surrogate child". BBC News. Archived from the original on 17 December 2018. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  12. 1 2 3 Loh, Viktor; Moktar, Faris (14 September 2018). "No discrimination against LGBTQ community at work, in housing and education here: Ong Ye Kung". Today. Singapore. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
  13. 1 2 3 Min, Ang Hwee. "'Everyone will be protected here' regardless of community and social, religious or sexual 'beliefs': Shanmugam". CNA. Retrieved 28 June 2022. LGBTQ persons, non-LGBTQ persons, we are all equal. We are not any lesser by reason of our sexual preferences.
  14. ↑ "Views of Homosexuality Around the World". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. 25 June 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  15. 1 2 Mokhtar, Faris (15 September 2018). "The Big Read: With a house still divided over 377A, time to seek common ground". Today. Singapore. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 30 September 2018.
  16. ↑ Han, Enze (3 May 2018). British Colonialism and the Criminalization of Homosexuality. Routledge. ISBN   9781351256186.
  17. 1 2 "Singapore reforms sex laws - but not for homosexuals". The Guardian. London. 24 October 2007. Archived from the original on 5 July 2019. Retrieved 5 July 2019.
  18. 1 2 "Section 377A in Singapore and the (De)Criminalization of Homosexuality" (PDF). National University of Singapore. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 September 2018. Retrieved 1 June 2019. Section 377A only criminalizes sex between males, but not between females.
  19. 1 2 Wong, Jonathan (2 October 2018). "Government has not curbed public prosecutor's discretion for Section 377A: A-G Lucien Wong". The Straits Times. Singapore. Archived from the original on 4 October 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  20. 1 2 "Section 377A: Public Prosecutor retains 'full prosecutorial discretion', says Attorney-General". Channel NewsAsia. Singapore. 2 October 2018. Archived from the original on 4 October 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  21. ↑ Glauert, Rik (27 June 2019). "Singapore will keep anti-gay law Section 377A 'for some time' says PM". Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  22. ↑ Maria, Anna (28 June 2019). "PM Lee: Whatever your sexual orientation, you're welcome to work in Singapore". The Independent News. Singapore. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  23. 1 2 3 4 "Gay rights in Singapore: On permanent parole". The Economist. London. 30 October 2014. Archived from the original on 16 July 2017. Retrieved 13 July 2017.
  24. ↑ "Global Rights/Commonwealth, Stage 1, Appendix 3". Alex Au. 3 October 2009. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 26 September 2010.
  25. ↑ "Penal Code - Singapore Statutes Online". sso.agc.gov.sg. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 30 September 2018.
  26. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2020). Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2020: Singapore. United States Department of State (Report).
  27. ↑ "Singapore: Enforcement". Human Dignity Trust.
  28. ↑ THIO Li-ann (2022). "Rightism, reasonableness, and review: Section 377A of the Penal Code and the Question of Equality – PART TWO". Singapore Academy of Law Journal. 34 (92).
  29. ↑ "Section 354 Penal Code". Singapore Statutes Online. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  30. ↑ "Section 294". Penal Code - Singapore Statutes Online. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  31. ↑ "Leong Wai Teng". NUS Department of Sociology. Archived from the original on 8 September 2005. Retrieved 13 July 2005.
  32. 1 2 "Singapore DJ files court challenge against gay sex ban after India ruling". Reuters. 12 September 2018. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018.
  33. ↑ Stolarchuk, Jewel (4 July 2019). "SDP's call to repeal section 377A 12 years ago recirculates online". The Independent News. Singapore. Archived from the original on 6 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  34. 1 2 Johnson, Constance (27 August 2012). "Singapore: Challenge to Law on Homosexuality Permitted". Library of Congress. Washington DC. Retrieved 4 April 2020.
  35. ↑ "Singapore: Court Ruling a Major Setback for Gay Rights" (Press release). Human Rights Watch. 29 October 2014. Archived from the original on 22 February 2017.
  36. ↑ "Tan Eng Hong v. Attorney-General (See Conclusion - section 187 of judgement)". SingaporeLaw.sg. 21 August 2012. Archived from the original on 23 November 2016. Retrieved 2 November 2015.
  37. 1 2 Qin, Amy (16 December 2018). "Inspired by India, Singaporeans Seek to End Gay Sex Ban". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 December 2018. Retrieved 17 December 2018.
  38. ↑ "Veteran Singapore diplomat Tommy Koh calls for gay community to challenge sex ban". Channel NewsAsia. Singapore. Reuters. 7 September 2018. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 30 September 2018.
  39. ↑ "Anti-gay law targeted again in Singapore lawsuit". Erasing 76 Crimes. 9 October 2018. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2018.
  40. ↑ Chua, Alfred (11 October 2018). "DJ has to file evidence challenging Section 377A by Nov 20". Today. Singapore. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2018.
  41. ↑ "LGBT rights advocate files case against Attorney-General, stating Section 377A of Penal Code is void". The Straits Times. Singapore. 22 January 2019. Archived from the original on 12 June 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  42. ↑ "Singapore: LGBT rights advocate files case against Attorney-General, stating Section 377A of Penal Code is void". Equal Eyes. 23 January 2019. Archived from the original on 26 July 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  43. ↑ "Two suits challenge Singapore's colonial-era anti-gay law". 76crimes.com. 8 February 2019. Archived from the original on 26 July 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  44. ↑ "Singapore's ban on gay sex faces legal challenge". Pink News. London. 23 January 2019. Archived from the original on 26 July 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  45. ↑ Kelleher, Patrick (26 September 2019). "Fresh battle to decriminalise gay sex launched in Singapore". Pink News. London.
  46. ↑ "High Court dismisses challenges against law that criminalises sex between men". The Straits Times. Singapore. 30 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  47. ↑ "Singapore court upholds gay sex ban". BBC News. 30 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  48. ↑ "Singapore court rejects challenge to gay sex ban". The Guardian. London. Agence France-Presse. 30 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  49. 1 2 "Singapore to table bill decrimnalising same sex relations between men". Wion. 20 October 2022. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
  50. ↑ Women's Charter (Ordinance 18, Section 12). Legislative Assembly of Singapore. 15 September 1961.
  51. ↑ "Singapore gay couple win right to adopt son born via surrogacy". BBC News. 3 January 2018. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  52. ↑ "Ruling to award adoption to single man in same-sex relationship". Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF). 20 November 2017. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  53. ↑ "Landmark High Court case allows gay dad to adopt surrogate son". The Straits Times. 3 January 2018. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  54. ↑ "Singapore gay couple win right to adopt surrogate son in landmark ruling". Reuters. 3 January 2018. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  55. ↑ Elegant, Simon (7 July 2003). "The Lion In Winter". Time Asia . Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 3 February 2007. Retrieved 11 January 2007.
  56. ↑ "What's It Like To Come Out As Gay To The SAF?". RICE. 27 June 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  57. ↑ Sylvia Tan (17 January 2006). "Singapore government awards S$100,000 grant to group with ex-gay affiliation". Fridae.com. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
  58. ↑ Lee, Darius (11 March 2021). "Conversion Therapy Bans - Enshrining a Contested View of Human Nature in Law". Singapore Academy of Law Journal. 33: 483–530.
  59. ↑ "Government's Stance on Changing One's Sexual Orientation through "Conversion Therapy"". Ministry of Health (Singapore) . 4 May 2020. Retrieved 23 June 2021.
  60. ↑ "Complaints about Psychiatrists, Psychologists and Counsellors from LGBTQ Clients". Ministry of Health (Singapore). 5 May 2020. Retrieved 23 June 2021.
  61. ↑ Leo, Lakeisha (22 August 2022). "LGBT content will continue to warrant higher age ratings even as Government repeals 377A: MCI". CNA. Retrieved 14 January 2023.
  62. ↑ Frois, Andre (10 July 2019). "Singapore rapper comes out as gay in song, recalls childhood when he 'didn't have anyone to turn to'". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  63. ↑ Koh, Lydia (4 July 2019). ""I'm OK", a song about a gay guy's journey by Singaporean Joshua Su makes its debut". The Independent Singapore. Archived from the original on 4 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  64. ↑ "Gay DJ pulls out of Singapore TEDx talk over censorship". Reuters. Kuala Lumpur. 4 July 2019. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  65. ↑ "For transgender students, a safe space in university halls is 'great comfort' — but not a given". CNA. Retrieved 21 August 2023.
  66. ↑ "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives". Yale-NUS College . Retrieved 21 August 2023.
  67. 1 2 "'So do I sit or stand?' Netizens divided by gender-neutral toilet at Suntec City". AsiaOne. 18 August 2023. Retrieved 21 August 2023.
  68. 1 2 3 4 5 "Temporary designation of Suntec toilets as 'gender-neutral' sparks hostile online reaction; others see move as positive". TODAY. Retrieved 21 August 2023.
  69. ↑ "Wear white to protest pink gay rally, religious groups say". Reuters. 23 June 2014. Archived from the original on 21 November 2015. Retrieved 2 November 2015.
  70. ↑ Ng, Gilaine (11 September 2018). "55 per cent of Singapore residents still support gay law: Poll". The Straits Times. Singapore. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 30 September 2018.
  71. ↑ Ho, Kim (18 February 2019). "Singaporeans split on same-sex civil partnerships". YouGov. Archived from the original on 25 February 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
  72. ↑ Glauert, Rik (19 February 2019). "A third of Singaporeans support same-sex civil partnership". Gay Star News. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
  73. ↑ "Singaporeans remain deeply divided on the issue of recognizing gay civil partnerships here". Yahoo! News. 19 February 2019. Archived from the original on 25 February 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
  74. ↑ "Singaporeans remain deeply divided on the issue of recognizing gay civil partnerships here". Coconuts Singapore. 19 February 2019. Archived from the original on 25 February 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
  75. ↑ "Greater public acceptance of gay sex and marriage: Survey". The Straits Times. Singapore. 3 May 2019. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. Retrieved 5 June 2019.
  76. ↑ Yuen-C, Tham (2 May 2019). "Singapore society still largely conservative but becoming more liberal on gay rights: IPS survey". The Straits Times. Singapore. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. Retrieved 5 June 2019.
  77. ↑ Beh Lih Yi (2 May 2019). "Support for gay rights seen growing in Singapore". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2 May 2019. Retrieved 2 May 2019.
  78. ↑ Wong, Cassandra (16 July 2019). "80% of Singaporeans say LGBTQ community still faces discrimination: survey". Yahoo Singapore. Singapore. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  79. ↑ Glauert, Rik (17 July 2019). "80% of Singaporeans agree LGBTI people face discrimination". Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  80. ↑ Glauert, Rik (18 July 2019). "53% of Singaporeans would react negatively if a family member came out". Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  81. ↑ "56% of Singaporeans opposed to more countries following Taiwan on same-sex marriages: survey". sg.news.yahoo.com. 20 July 2019. Archived from the original on 26 July 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  82. ↑ Awang, Nabilah (10 March 2022). "TODAY Youth Survey: High overall acceptance of LGBTQ people among youth, but family members having same-sex relationships harder to accept". Today. Singapore. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  83. ↑ Yuen-C, Tham (16 June 2022). "Support for Section 377A drops as attitudes towards same-sex relationships shift, survey finds". The Straits Times. Singapore. Retrieved 28 June 2022.
  84. ↑ Lim, Ida (12 September 2023). "Pew survey: Eight in 10 Malaysians oppose same-sex marriage, local Buddhists most supportive". Malay Mail. Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  85. ↑ Ang, Shermaine (10 June 2024). "Many Singaporeans on the fence about LGBTQ issues, Ipsos survey finds". The Straits Times. Singapore. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  86. ↑ Glauert, Rik (5 June 2019). "Study finds there are 210,000 men who have sex with men in Singapore". Gay Star News. London. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. Retrieved 5 June 2019.
  87. ↑ "Study estimates 210,000 men who have sex with men in S'pore, at risk of HIV". Today. Singapore. 4 June 2019. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. Retrieved 5 June 2019.
  88. ↑ "Singapore's annual gay rights rally sees largest turnout". Reuters. 13 June 2015. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 2 November 2015.
  89. ↑ Lee, Joshua (29 June 2019). "Lee Hsien Yang attends Pink Dot for first time with Li Huanwu & Heng Yirui". mothership. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
  90. ↑ Min, Chew Hui (18 June 2018). "Pink Dot returns to Hong Lim Park for the first time since COVID-19 pandemic started; MPs among attendees". CNA. Retrieved 18 June 2022.
  91. ↑ Tan, Theresa (28 March 2022). "Singapore to allow women, including singles, to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons". The Straits Times. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
  92. ↑ "Surrogacy law: regulated, unregulated - Whereivf.com". www.whereivf.com. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 10 June 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.