The New Zealand flag debate is a question over whether the national flag should be changed. For several decades, alternative designs have been proposed, with varying degrees of support. There is no consensus among proponents of changing the flag as to which design should replace the current one. Common criticisms of the existing form of the New Zealand flag are its similarity to the Australian flag and the inappropriateness of retaining the Union Jack in the design. [1] A series of polls conducted since the 1970s have shown that a majority of New Zealanders prefer the current flag. [1]
New Zealand's Government held a two-stage binding referendum on a flag change in 2015 and 2016. [2] The four designs chosen as finalists faced criticism for their similarity and reliance on sporting iconography more closely associated with a subset of the population. [3] The referendum was also criticised as an expensive distraction from more important political issues—especially because of the overt endorsement of two silver fern flag designs by Kyle Lockwood (one of which was the flag design at top right) by then-Prime Minister John Key—and for the amateur nature of the crowd-sourced entries. [4] Voters chose to retain the current flag, by a vote of 56.6% to 43.1%. [5] Turnout in the referendum was 67%—relatively low compared to the 74-80% turnout in general elections in the 21st century. [6] [7] The referendum, especially the alternative designs offered, was mocked by commentators in New Zealand and abroad, [3] [8] and John Key named it as one of his main regrets when he announced his retirement from politics in 2016. [9]
Proponents for change argue that:
Opponents to change argue that:
During World War II, Prime Minister Peter Fraser received suggestions to include a Māori emblem on the flag. He deferred the matter until after the war, but never brought it up again. [31]
Debate on keeping or changing the New Zealand Flag started before May 1973, when a remit to change the flag, declare New Zealand a republic, and change the national anthem (then only "God Save the Queen") was voted down by the Labour Party at their national conference. [17] At this time, proposals for changing the flag were typically linked with republicanism.
In November 1979, the Minister of Internal Affairs, Allan Highet, suggested that the design of the flag should be changed, and sought an artist to design a new flag with a silver fern on the fly. The proposal attracted little support. [32]
The Austrian-born surrealist visual artist Friedensreich Hundertwasser designed his titular koru flag in 1983. The flag design was one of the earliest serious contenders and was cause of much media attention. [33] [34] Twenty-five Members of Parliament expressed support for the flag when it was publicly unveiled in 1986, including then-prime minister David Lange. [35]
In 1988, Minister of Foreign Affairs Russell Marshall made a call for a flag change, which also had little effect. [1]
The New Zealand Listener magazine held a flag design contest in 1989, attracting nearly 600 entries. Out of the seven semi-finalists, which included the national flag and the Flag of the United Tribes of New Zealand, the national flag won with a minority vote of 45.6%. [1]
In February 1992, the former Minister of Māori Affairs, Matiu Rata, called for a flag change "to re-establish our national identity".
In 1998, Prime Minister Jenny Shipley backed Cultural Affairs Minister Marie Hasler's call for the flag to be changed. Shipley, along with the New Zealand Tourism Board, supported the quasi-national silver fern flag, by using a white silver fern on a black background, along the lines of the Canadian Maple Leaf flag. [17]
Both of these events were met with opposition from the Returned Services' Association.
In 2004, the NZ Flag.com Trust was founded by businessman Lloyd Morrison with the aim of bringing about a non-binding referendum on the subject. Under New Zealand law, a referendum may be held on any issue if 10% of electors sign a petition which is presented to Parliament. The Trust launched their petition for such a referendum in 2005. Their campaign used a stylised silver fern flag designed by Cameron Sanders.
In response to the petition, the New Zealand Flag Institute was founded to oppose the referendum campaign and promote the current flag, as well as to offer a more scholarly view of the flag. The Royal New Zealand Returned and Services' Association (RNZRSA), the New Zealand organisation for war veterans, did not openly back the current flag at its annual conference, passing a remit that "It is the view of RNZRSA that any change to the New Zealand Flag should be solely the prerogative of the people of New Zealand as determined by a substantial majority of electors in a referendum. It is also the association's view that this matter should be taken out of the political arena." [36]
The petition attracted 100,000 signatures out of the required approximately 270,000 and was withdrawn in July 2005, well before the general election in September. The NZ Flag.com Trust cited public apathy to change as the main reason for withdrawing the petition. [37]
On 5 August 2010, Labour list MP Charles Chauvel introduced a member's bill for a consultative commission followed by a referendum on the New Zealand flag. [38]
In January 2014, Prime Minister John Key floated the idea of a referendum on a new flag at the 2014 general election. [39] The proposal was met with mixed response. [40] [41] In March, Key announced that, should the National government be re-elected for a third term, the government would hold a nationwide referendum within the next three years asking whether or not to change the flag design. [42] Following National's re-election later that year, the details of the referendum were announced. [2]
Shortly after the referendum announcement, party leaders reviewed draft legislation and selected candidates for a Flag Consideration Panel. The purpose of this group was to publicise the process, seek flag submissions and suggestions from the public, and decide on a final shortlist of options. Open consultation and design solicitation garnered 10,292 design suggestions from the public, later reduced to a longlist of 40 designs and then a shortlist of 4 designs to contend in the first referendum. [43] [44]
The first referendum took place between 20 November and 11 December 2015 and asked, "If the New Zealand flag changes, which flag would you prefer?" [45] [2] Voters were presented with several options selected by the Flag Consideration Panel. The black, white, and blue silver fern flag by Kyle Lockwood advanced to the second referendum.
The second referendum took place between 3 and 24 March 2016 and asked voters to choose between the selected alternative (the black, white and blue silver fern flag) and the existing New Zealand flag. [46] [47] The final decision was to retain the current flag, by a vote of 56.6% to 43.1%. [5]
Reception of the process and the official options were highly critical, [48] with no great enthusiasm shown among the public. [49] [50] [51] [52] From an aggregation of analyses, the consensus was that the referendum was "a bewildering process that seems to have satisfied few". [48] Political communications professor Claire Robinson labelled the debate an example of groupthink, writing: "I can't figure how the panel can rationalise drawing on old symbols as a way of celebrating us as progressive." [53]
Prime Minister John Key said that he was disappointed by the decision to retain the current flag, while stating he was pleased that the country had a valuable discussion about what it stood for. [54] The failure of the referendum resulted in a loss of political prestige for Key. [54]
Date | Conducted by | For change | Against change | Undecided | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
22–26 October 2020 | Research New Zealand | 19% | 56% | 26% | This online poll was conducted just after the 2020 general election, approximately four years after the national flag referendum. It did not reference any particular alternative design. Sample size was 1003 respondents and margin of error was 3.1%. [55] |
10–15 March 2016 | UMR | 35% | 58% | 7% | This poll was framed around the second referendum's "Silver Fern with Black, White and Blue" design as the alternative flag. National voters were more likely to vote for change than those affiliated with other political parties. Younger voters were most against change. Sample size was 750 and margin of error was 3.6%. [56] |
25–29 February 2016 | UMR | 32% | 59% | 9% | This poll was framed around the second referendum's "Silver Fern with Black, White and Blue" design as the alternative flag. National voters were more likely to vote for change than those affiliated with other political parties. Women were more likely to be against change than men. Sample was 750 eligible voters and margin of error was 3.6%. [57] |
February 2016 | TV3/Reid Research | 30% | 70% | 0% | 16% of those "against change" were in support of change but did not support the proposed flag design of the second referendum. [58] |
January 2016 | UMR | 35% | 65% | 0% | This poll was conducted after the first referendum had been completed and the "Silver Fern with Black, White and Blue" design was selected as the alternative flag design for the second referendum. One in five were in favour of changing the national flag but disliked the proposed design of the second referendum and planned to vote against change. 80% of that group (i.e. 16% of the whole sample) saw the vote as a way to "send a message to John Key". Sample size was 750 and margin of error was 3.6%. [57] |
8 December 2015 | HorizonPoll | 34% | 58% | 7% | The poll identified "Silver Fern with Black, White and Blue" and "Silver Fern with Red, White and Blue" as the most popular designs out of the referendum shortlist. Sample size was 2075 and margin of error was 2.2%. [59] |
November 2015 | TV3/Reid Research | 28% | 65% | 7% | Sample size and margin of error unknown. [60] |
8–16 September 2015 | Reid Research | 25% | 69% | 6% | The question was asked specifically in relation to the referendum shortlist designs. Sample was 1000 eligible voters and margin of error was 3.1%. [61] |
14–24 August 2015 | The New Zealand Herald | 23% | 53% | 24% | This poll was conducted after the referendum shortlist had been revealed. Women were more likely to be against change (61%) compared to men (44%). Sample was 750 eligible voters and margin of error was 3.6%. [62] |
April 2015 | The New Zealand Herald | 25% | 70% | 5% | This poll was conducted after the flag referendum legislation passed in parliament and its details were finalised. 80% agreed that the referendums should first ask if the public wants a change before presenting other designs. When asked about specific design elements, a plurality of 45% preferred the silver fern, followed by the southern cross (18%). Sample was 750 eligible voters and margin of error was 3.6%. [63] |
September 2014 | TVNZ | 35% | 65% | 0% | Sample size was "almost 1000". [64] |
6–16 March 2014 | The New Zealand Herald | 40.6% | 52.6% | 6.8% | When asked about specific design elements, a plurality of 42.9% preferred the silver fern, followed by the koru. Resistance to change was higher amongst women, Aucklanders and those in the youngest and oldest age brackets. Sample was 750 eligible voters and margin of error was 3.5%. [65] |
February 2014 | Colmar Brunton | 28% | 72% | 0% | The poll also found that 85% wanted a change to be decided by the public rather than the government, and that only 2% thought that changing the flag was an important issue in the 2014 general election. Sample size unknown. [66] |
July 2013 | TV3 | 61% | 39% | 0% | Sample size unknown. [67] |
2012 | University of Auckland and Victoria University of Wellington | 29.5% | 53.1% | 17.4% | Support for a flag change was highest among Green Party voters (49% in favour) and lowest among National Party voters (26% in favour). Sample size was 12182. [68] |
January/February 2010 | The New Zealand Herald | 52.3% | 44.4% | 3.3% | When asked about specific design elements, a majority of 52.5% preferred the silver fern, followed by the kiwi (18%), koru (13%), southern cross (12.5%) and tiki (1%). Aucklanders and those in the youngest and oldest age brackets expressed significantly more resistance to change. Sample size was 600 and margin of error was 4%. [69] |
2009 | The New Zealand Herald | 25% | 62% | 13% | Sample size unknown. [70] |
2004 | Colmar Brunton | 42% | 58% | 0% | Sample size unknown. [66] |
August 1999 | National Business Review | 24% | 64% | 12% | When presented with the silver fern flag, the numbers changed to 33% supporting change and 60% against. [17] |
Date | Conducted by | For change | Neutral | Against change | Don't know/Refused | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 2015 | University of Auckland | 12% | 27% | 61% | 0% | The 27% figure represents the response "depends on the design". Support for changing the flag was higher amongst males, Wellingtonians and those with higher income, education and right-wing political affiliation. The youngest and oldest age brackets were most against change. Sample size was 838. [71] |
September/October 2014 | Research New Zealand | 19% | 37% | 43% | 1% | Younger respondents were significantly against change compared to older respondents, but no other differences existed between demographic groups (gender, income, location and ethnicity). Sample size was 1001. [72] |
March 2014 | Research New Zealand | 18% | 43% | 37% | 2% | Sample size was 500. [72] |
February 2014 | Research New Zealand | 22% | 39% | 37% | 1% | Sample size was 500. [72] |
August 2011 | Research New Zealand | 19% | 30% | 52% | 1% | Sample size was 1252. [72] |
Date | Conducted by | Yes, change, to the silver fern | Yes, change, but to something else | Not bothered either way | No, we should not change | Don't know | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
February 2014 | Fairfax Media/Ipsos | 17.9% | 23.7% | 18.7% | 38.6% | 1.1% | Total 'change vote' was 41.6%. Sample size was 1018 and margin of error was 3.0%. [73] |
In 2009, The New Zealand Herald surveyed various political party leaders and the twenty two members of the Order of New Zealand, with the results showing an even split. [1]
The silver fern flag is a popular unofficial flag of New Zealand. The silver fern itself is a recognised national symbol, and its current and historic usage including:
The proposal of replacing the national flag of New Zealand with the silver fern flag has been supported by then-Cultural Affairs Minister Marie Hasler, then-Prime Minister Jenny Shipley and the New Zealand Tourism Board in 1998, [17] and then-Prime Minister John Key in 2010. [83] Key later changed his preference to Kyle Lockwood's Silver Fern (Red, White & Blue) design, due to the similarity of the silver fern flag with the Jihadist black flag, used by Islamic extremist groups such as ISIL. [12] Amongst the public, polls have shown that the silver fern is the most preferred alternative design for a new national flag. [63] [65] [69]
The New Zealand Flag Institute objects to the silver fern flag, describing it as the logo of some of New Zealand's national sporting teams, and accordingly, not representative of the nation itself. [84] This design originated from the All Blacks. [85] The New Zealand Rugby Union has attempted to copyright claim silver fern flags. [86]
On 1 September 2015, the Flag Consideration Panel announced the final four designs to be included in the first referendum. [87] On 23 September, Prime Minister John Key confirmed the Red Peak flag would be added as a fifth option in the flag referendum after growing popular support for the design to be added to the referendum options. [88]
Image | Designer | Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Alofi Kanter | Silver Fern (Black and White) | A variation of the silver fern flag which included the silver fern and the black and white colour scheme. [89] This design uses counterchanging and the fern design from the New Zealand Government's Masterbrand logo. [90] In the referendum, this design was ranked fourth out of the five shortlisted options. | |
Kyle Lockwood | Silver Fern (Red, White and Blue) | The silver fern represents the growth of the nation and the Southern Cross represents the location of New Zealand in the antipodes. The blue represents New Zealand's clear atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean. The red represents the country's heritage and sacrifices made. [91] This proposal won a Wellington newspaper flag competition in July 2004 and appeared on TV3 in 2005 after winning a poll which included the present national flag. [92] In the referendum, this design was ranked second out of the five shortlisted options. It was criticised on aesthetic grounds by Hamish Keith, Paul Henry and John Oliver. [12] [93] New Zealand Herald writer Karl Puschmann called it a design for those "sitting on the fence" who didn't want much change [3] and the National Business Review labelled it "amateur" and "dated". [6] Members of the public compared it unfavourably to Weet-Bix packaging, "Kiwi Party Ware" plastic plate packaging, the National Basketball Association logo, or a merger of the Labour and National party logos. [94] | |
Kyle Lockwood | Silver Fern (Black, White and Blue) | Variation of the above with black instead of red, and a different shade of blue. This general design was prime minister John Key's preferred proposal. In the referendum, this design was ranked first out of the five shortlisted options. This flag received similar feedback to the red variation. | |
Andrew Fyfe | Koru (Black) | Features a Māori koru pattern depicting an unfurling fern frond, traditionally representing new life, growth, strength and peace. In this flag it is meant to also resemble a wave, cloud and ram's horn. [89] In the referendum, this design was ranked fifth out of the five shortlisted options. When this design was revealed on the shortlist, the public immediately nicknamed it "Hypnoflag" via social media. [95] | |
Aaron Dustin | Red Peak | This design was inspired by the story of Rangi and Papa (a Māori creation myth) and the geography of New Zealand. It is reminiscent of tāniko patterns and tukutuku panelling. [96] In the referendum, this design was ranked third out of the five shortlisted options. This design was not initially on the official shortlist but a social media campaign to add this design became successful on 23 September 2015. [97] [88] The National Business Review noted that the design community generally preferred this design but it did not resonate with the public at large. [6] |
An assortment of historical designs, and formal and informal proposals:
Image | Designer | Date | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
James Busby | 1834 | The flag of the United Tribes of New Zealand was the national flag of New Zealand when it first declared independence in 1835, until the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840. | |
Mike Davidson | 2000 [98] | "Black Jack" was designed by art director Mike Davidson in 2000. [99] It was a finalist in the flag competition and became known for its originality and koru-style Union Jack. [100] [101] | |
Clark Titman | 1967 | A simple proposal of a tricolour (red white and blue) [17] | |
D.A. Bale | Early 1980s | Blue with a double koru on a broad white vertical band. [17] The double koru was established as the logo of Air New Zealand in 1973. | |
Friedensreich Hundertwasser | 1983 | The koru flag represents an uncurling fern frond in the form of a stylised koru, a traditional Māori carving pattern. This flag is occasionally seen around the country. [102] | |
John Ansell, Kenneth Wang, Grant McLachlan | 1986, 2015 | The Black & Silver flag is based on a stylized version of the original silver ferns used in the emblems of the military and sports representative teams of the 1880s. John Ansell's silver fern flag designs won him a Colenso Scholarship to New York in 1986 and in 1990 came second out of 600 alternative flag designs in The Listener contest to mark New Zealand's sesquicentennial. [103] | |
James Dignan | 2002 | This proposal was displayed in the New Zealand Herald on 9 May 2002, at the time of the centenary of the current flag. It combines elements from the national flag, the Tino rangatiratanga flag and the silver fern flag. This combination looks to links with both the United Kingdom and Polynesia. [104] [105] | |
Helen Clark | 2007 | An informal proposal by Prime Minister Helen Clark. She said that removing the Union Jack from the New Zealand flag was a possibility if people wanted to redesign the flag, leaving it as a "rather attractive Southern Cross." [106] | |
James Bowman | 2015 | The Koru Fern combines two iconic New Zealand symbols: the silver fern and the koru . It was one design that helped stimulate debate prior to official submissions and was submitted to the Flag Consideration Panel as an alternative design for the flag. [107] [108] [109] | |
Lucy Gray | 2015 | A submission to the Flag Consideration Panel, the Laser Kiwi flag features a silver fern and a kiwi shooting a laser beam from its eyes. The flag became a large social media phenomenon, and was used in comedy routines by comedians discussing the flag referendum and New Zealand in general, such as John Oliver. [110] | |
Studio Alexander (Grant Alexander, Alice Murray, Thomas Lawlor, Jared McDowell) | 2015 | The Wā kāinga/Home flag won the $20,000 top prize in the Morgan Foundation's competition. Each coloured triangle represents a culture. They coexist around the white space. [111] |
Waitangi Day, the national day of New Zealand, marks the anniversary of the initial signing—on 6 February 1840—of the Treaty of Waitangi. The Treaty of Waitangi was an agreement towards British sovereignty by representatives of the Crown and indigenous Māori chiefs, and so is regarded by many as the founding document of the nation.
The flag of New Zealand, also known as the New Zealand Ensign, is based on the British maritime Blue Ensign – a blue field with the Union Jack in the canton or upper hoist corner – augmented or defaced with four red stars centred within four white stars, representing the Southern Cross constellation.
Dame Jennifer Mary Shipley is a New Zealand former politician who served as the 36th prime minister of New Zealand from 1997 to 1999. She was the first female prime minister of New Zealand, and the first woman to lead the National Party.
Alsophila tricolor, synonym Cyathea dealbata, commonly known as the silver fern or silver tree-fern, or as ponga or punga, is a species of medium-sized tree fern, endemic to New Zealand. The fern is usually recognisable by the silver-white colour of the under-surface of mature fronds. It is a symbol commonly associated with the country both overseas and by New Zealanders themselves.
Sir John Phillip Key is a New Zealand retired politician who served as the 38th prime minister of New Zealand from 2008 to 2016 and as leader of the National Party from 2006 to 2016.
Marie Bernadine Hasler is a former New Zealand politician. She was a member of Parliament for the National Party from 1990 to 1993, and then again from 1996 to 2002.
Change the NZ Flag was a group campaigning for New Zealanders to change the national flag of New Zealand. The group described itself as "an independent, non-political, design-neutral society that is committed to building support for, and involvement with, the flag change process."
A silver fern flag is any flag design that incorporates a silver fern, and is usually a white silver fern on a black background. The silver fern motif is associated with New Zealand, and a silver fern flag may be used as an unofficial flag of New Zealand, to which it is endemic. The silver fern itself is a quasi-national emblem, being used for various official symbols, including the coat of arms of New Zealand and the New Zealand one dollar coin. A number of New Zealand sports teams, such as the cricket team, the netball team and the rugby union team, use similar silver fern flags as part of their official merchandise. The All Whites, New Zealand's national association football team, use a white background and a black version of the fern.
The black, white and blue silver fern flag is a proposed flag for New Zealand by architectural designer Kyle Lockwood. It was first designed using different colours in 2000. It was voted as the preferred alternative New Zealand flag in the first of two New Zealand flag referendums in December 2015, and was used in the second flag referendum in a binding contest against the current New Zealand flag. Despite a UMR poll predicting that the flag would earn only 35% of the vote, the Silver Fern Flag gained a significant minority in the March 2016 referendum with 43.2% of the vote, whilst the existing flag won with 56.6% of the vote.
The Australian flag debate is a question over whether the Australian flag should be changed, particularly to remove the Union Jack from the canton, but also to possibly introduce a completely new design without the Southern Cross.
The Fifth National Government of New Zealand was the government of New Zealand for three parliamentary terms from 19 November 2008 to 26 October 2017. John Key served as National Leader and prime minister until December 2016, after which Bill English assumed the premiership until the National Government's defeat following the October 2017 government-forming negotiations.
The 2009 New Zealand Referendum on Child Discipline was held from 31 July to 21 August, and was a citizens-initiated referendum on parental corporal punishment. It asked:
Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?
David Breen Seymour is a New Zealand politician who has been the Leader of ACT New Zealand and the Member of Parliament (MP) for Epsom since 2014. He currently serves as the 1st Minister for Regulation in the Sixth National Government under Christopher Luxon.
The Hundertwasser Art Centre with Wairau Māori Art Gallery is an art and cultural centre in Whangārei, New Zealand. It is the conception of artist and architect Friedensreich Hundertwasser, who lived near Kawakawa for 30 years, and was first designed in 1993. The project proved controversial and was considered and rejected a number of times until it was approved by a binding referendum in June 2015. The centre opened on 20 February 2022 with the inaugural exhibition, Puhi Ariki, curated by Nigel Borell.
The Red Peak flag is a proposed New Zealand flag that appeared as one of five options for voters to consider in the 2015–16 flag referendums. Designed by Aaron Dustin in 2015, Red Peak appeared on the government's official longlist of 40 alternative flag designs before failing a final culling of the field on 1 September 2015 to four options. After public disappointment with the official four-flag shortlist, a social media campaign was launched on 2 September that revived the flag's prospects and captured the attention of leading parliamentary figures both in government and opposition. On 23 September, Prime Minister John Key announced the government had agreed to support Green Party legislation that would add Red Peak to the referendum ballot as a fifth option.
Two referendums were held by the New Zealand Government in November/December 2015 and March 2016 to determine the nation's flag. The voting resulted in the retention of the existing flag of New Zealand.
Kyle Simon Lockwood JP is a New Zealand architectural designer based in Melbourne, Australia. He is known for leading the successful campaign for the New Zealand Government to reintroduce the duration of the New Zealand passport to ten years, and for designing the two flags that came first and second, in the first New Zealand flag referendum. He also successfully lobbied for the introduction of the popular 18+ card.
The ethnic Māori flag, also known as the Tino Rangatiratanga flag in reference to the concept of tino rangatiratanga, is used to represent the ethnic identity some of the descendants of precolonial native people of the territory that later became New Zealand. In 2009, the Tino Rangatiratanga flag was selected as the ethnic Māori flag after a nationwide consultation. It was first revealed on Waitangi Day in 1990. Though it does not have official status from the New Zealand Government, it has been used by the government on official occasions.
The Laser Kiwi flag, originally titled Fire the Lazar, was designed in 2015 by Lucy Gray as a proposed flag of New Zealand for the 2015–2016 New Zealand flag referendums. It has since become a social media phenomenon that has created ongoing interest in the design.
The flag now known as the flag of theUnited Tribes of New Zealand or Te Kara is a flag originally designed by Henry Williams to represent the New Zealand Church Missionary Society. It was adopted as a national flag by a group of rangatira in 1834 and is today more closely associated with the Māori people.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)