Siege of Jerusalem (70 CE) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the First Jewish–Roman War | |||||||
![]() Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by Francesco Hayez. Oil on canvas, 1867. | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Roman Empire | Jews | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Strength | |||||||
50,000 | Unknown |
Part of a series on |
Jerusalem |
---|
![]() |
The siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE was the decisive event of the First Jewish–Roman War (66–73 CE), a major rebellion against Roman rule in the province of Judaea. Led by Titus, the Roman forces besieged the city, which had become the stronghold of Jewish resistance. After months of conflict, the Romans breached the city's defenses, culminating in the destruction of the Second Temple, the razing of the city, and the mass killing, enslavement and displacement of its inhabitants. The siege marked the effective end of the Jewish revolt and had profound political, religious, and cultural implications for the Jewish people as well as broader historical consequences.
In the winter of 69/70 CE, Titus led a force of approximately 50,000 troops, including four legions and auxiliary forces, into Judaea. By spring, this army encircled Jerusalem, whose population had swelled with Passover pilgrims and refugees from across the province. The city, already weakened by infighting among rival factions led by John of Gischala, Simon bar Giora and Eleazar ben Simon—who had seized control after the collapse of the moderate rebel government—was cut off from supplies, leaving its inhabitants to suffer from starvation and disease. Despite strong resistance from the defenders, the Romans broke through the city's walls, forcing the defenders into the temple precincts.
In the summer month of Av, Roman forces breached the Temple Mount and destroyed the Second Temple—an event commemorated annually in Jewish tradition on the fast day of Tisha B'Av. The Romans ultimately captured the entire city, quelling the remaining resistance and inflicting a heavy toll on the population, with tens of thousands killed, enslaved, or executed. The city was systematically destroyed, leaving only the three towers of the Herodian citadel standing as a symbol of its former grandeur. A year later, the Roman victory was celebrated with a grand triumph in Rome, during which hundreds of captives were paraded alongside the spoils of the temple, including the menorah. Monumental structures, such as the still-standing Arch of Titus, were erected in the city to commemorate the conquest.
The destruction of Jerusalem and the temple marked a major turning point in Jewish history, carrying profound consequences that reshaped Jewish culture, religion, and identity. With the temple's destruction, Jewish worship adapted, giving rise to Rabbinic Judaism, which emphasized prayer, Torah study, and synagogue gatherings in place of the sacrificial rituals once performed in the temple. The fall of Jerusalem also played an important role in the development of early Christianity, as the movement increasingly distanced itself from its Jewish roots. After the war, Legio X Fretensis established a military camp on Jerusalem's ruins. A few decades later, the Romans re-founded Jerusalem as the colony of Aelia Capitolina, dedicating it to Jupiter and extinguishing Jewish hopes for the restoration of the temple. This set the stage for another major Jewish rebellion—the Bar Kokhba revolt.
During the Second Temple Period, Jerusalem was the center of religious and national life for Jews, including those in the Diaspora. [1] The Second Temple attracted tens and maybe hundreds of thousands during the Three Pilgrimage Festivals. [1] The city reached a peak in size and population during the late Second Temple period, when the city covered two square kilometres (3⁄4 square mile) and, according to one estimate, had an estimated population of 200,000. [2] [3] Magen Broshi estimated the population at around 80,000, [4] while other assessments range from 25,000 to over 150,000. [5] In his Natural History, Pliny the Elder celebrated it as "by far, the most famous of the cities of the East". [6]
In the early Roman period, Jerusalem had two distinct precincts. The first encompassed the regions within the "first wall", the City of David and the Upper City, and was heavily built up, though less so at its wealthy parts. The second, known as the "suburb" or "Bethesda", lay north of the first and was sparsely populated. It contained that section of Jerusalem within the Herodian "second wall" (which was still standing), though it was itself surrounded by the new "third wall", built by king Agrippa I. [7]
Josephus stated that Agrippa wanted to build a wall at least 5 meters thick, literally impenetrable by contemporary siege engines. Agrippa, however, never moved beyond the foundations, out of fear of emperor Claudius "lest he should suspect that so strong a wall was built in order to make some innovation in public affairs." [8] It was only completed later, to a lesser strength and in much haste, when the First Jewish–Roman War broke out and the defenses of Jerusalem had to be bolstered. Nine towers adorned the third wall.
Jerusalem's natural defenses were weakened by its dependence on imported food, particularly grain, wine, and livestock, since its surrounding agricultural regions could not provide for the city's needs, making it susceptible to famines. [9] The city drew supplies from fertile areas in Judaea, Samaria, Galilee, and beyond. [9] During the war, the city's dependence on imports grew due to the influx of refugees and insurgents. [9]
The First Jewish–Roman War, also known as the Great Jewish Revolt, broke following the appointment of prefect Gessius Florus and his demand to receive temple funds. The governor of Syria, Cestius Gallus, launched a campaign to suppress the rebellion, advancing into Jerusalem in Autumn 66. After setting fire to the parts of the city, [10] he unexpectedly chose to retreat after initial skirmishes. [11] His forces, withdrawing to the coastal plain, were ambushed and decisively defeated at Beth Horon, suffering losses equivalent to an entire legion. [12] [11] [13]
After their victory, the Jews established a provisional government at the Jerusalem temple, led by aristocrats, [14] including former High Priest Ananus ben Ananus. [15] The new government appointed commanders to various regions and focused on strengthening Jerusalem's defenses, completing the unfinished Third Wall to protect the city's northern side. [16]
Following Gallus's defeat, Nero entrusted the job of crushing the rebellion in Judaea to Vespasian, a talented and unassuming general. In early 68 CE, Vespasian landed at Ptolemais and began suppression of the revolt with operations in the Galilee. By July 69 all of Judea but Jerusalem had been pacified and the city, now hosting rebel leaders from all over the country, came under Roman siege. [17]
Realizing Jerusalem would pose a greater challenge than previous campaigns, Vespasian paused his advance to train and reorganize his forces. Meanwhile, 68/69 CE was marked by turmoil within the Roman Empire, a period known as the Year of the Four Emperors, during which four rulers successively claimed the imperial throne. [18] [19] By late 69 CE, Vespasian was declared emperor in the east, [20] and departed for Rome to secure the throne. [20] His son Titus was entrusted with the final suppression of the revolt and the capture of Jerusalem.
A fortified stronghold, it might have held for a significant amount of time, if not for the intense civil war that then broke out among the Jewish rebels. [17] In the city, the three rival factions—led by Eleazar ben Simon, John of Gischala, and Simon bar Giora—each controlled different sections of the city. John of Gischala controlled most of the Temple Mount. Eleazar, with a small force, held the inner courtyard of the temple, which was surrounded by a fortified wall. Simon bar Giora dominated the remaining parts of Jerusalem, concentrating his main forces in the Upper City. As infighting intensified, food storage facilities were set on fire, destroying essential provisions that had been stockpiled in anticipation of the Roman siege. [21] [22]
By the winter of 69/70, Titus had arrived from Alexandria and established Caesarea as his main base. [23] His forces included the legions previously commanded by Vespasian—V Macedonica, X Fretensis, and XV Apollinaris—along with the XII Fulminata, which had suffered defeat in 66 CE. [24] Additional support came from detachments of III Cyrenaica and XXII Deiotariana legions from Egypt, twenty infantry cohortes, eight cavalry alae, Syrian irregulars, and auxiliaries from allied vassal kings. According to Tacitus, "a strong force of Arabs", driven by longstanding enmity toward the Jews, also joined the campaign. [24] This combined force, estimated at a minimum of 48,200 soldiers, [25] was significantly larger than the one deployed for the Roman invasion of Britain in 43 CE. [26]
At the same time, infighting continued in Jerusalem. [27] According to Josephus, the city was engulfed in a three-way civil war, with each faction inflicting harm on the others. Tacitus corroborates this account, noting that the city was divided among three generals and three armies. [28] [29] Initially sharing control of the Temple Mount, Eleazar ben Simon broke away from John of Gischala's faction and fortified himself in the temple's inner court, taking hold of the stores of edible offerings to the temple. [27] John attacked from below, while Simon Bar Giora's forces, who continued to hold the Upper and Lower City, assaulted John's position. [27] Both sides resorted to artillery, inflicting heavy casualties, including priests and worshippers. [30]
In early Nisan 70 (March/April), Titus departed from Caesarea with Legio XII Fulminata and Legio XV Apollinaris, marching toward Jerusalem. [31] Tiberius Julius Alexander, a Jewish-born equestrian governor and general who had renounced his faith and ancestral traditions, [32] served as Titus' second-in-command. [33] The Roman army advanced through Samaria, reaching Gophna, located 13 miles (21 km) north of Jerusalem. [34] Legio V Macedonica, led by Sextus Vettulenus Cerialis, marched southward toward Jerusalem via Emmaus, while A. Larcius Lepidus Sulpicianus approached from the west through Jericho with Legio X Fretensis. [34] Titus' main force After resting at Gophna, Titus' force camped in the "Valley of Thorns" near Gibeah, three miles from Jerusalem. [35] Mirroring the strategies of Sennacherib, Nebuchadnezzar II, Pompey, and Herod in their previous sieges of the city, Titus set his sights on the city's north-northeast side. This area was more accessible, as, unlike other parts of the city, it lacked the protection of a ravine. [36] [37]
On the eve of the siege, Jerusalem spanned approximately 170 hectares (420 acres) [4] and, according to one estimate, had a population of around 80,000. [4] Tacitus writes that those who were besieged in Jerusalem amounted to no fewer than 600,000, that men and women alike of every age engaged in armed resistance, that everyone who could pick up a weapon did, and that both sexes showed equal determination, preferring death to a life that involved expulsion from their country. [38] [39] Josephus puts the number of the besieged at nearly 1 million. Many pilgrims from the Jewish diaspora who, undeterred by the war, had trekked to Jerusalem to be present at the temple during Passover became trapped in Jerusalem during the siege. [40] The city also harbored refugees from various regions of the province, including Judea, Galilee, and Idumaea. [41] The factions vying for control of the city ceased hostilities and joined forces to defend it only when the Romans began using battering rams against the walls. [42]
In preparation for the assault on Jerusalem, Titus undertook a risky reconnaissance mission with 600 cavalrymen to evaluate the city's northern defenses, during which he narrowly escaped an ambush by rebel forces after being cut off from his main group. [36] [43] Soon after, Titus advanced to Mount Scopus, northeast of Jerusalem, where he established camps for Legions XII, XV and V. [44] Legion X set up camp on the Mount of Olives, [44] but as they were constructing their encampment—some soldiers unarmed—they were attacked by a joint force from the rival factions. [45] [46] [47] The Jews charged across the Kidron Valley, catching the Romans completely by surprise. [48] [46] Only Titus' personal intervention saved the situation, and the Romans managed to repel the attackers. [45] John and Simon reconciled, [45] but their factions continued to maintain separate leadership structures. [49] The rebel leaders upheld the previous division of the city into distinct zones of control: John was in charge of defending the Temple Mount, the Ophel, and the Kidron Valley, while Simon's forces defended the city's residential areas. [49] [37]
On 14 Nisan, with the onset of the week-long Passover festival, the Jews halted their attacks, and the Romans took advantage of the pause to move their besieging forces closer to the city's walls. [50] Meanwhile, on the first night of the holiday, John's forces used the opening of the temple's inner courtyard gates, which were meant for worshippers attending the festival, as cover to infiltrate the temple's inner courtyards, subduing the Zealots and bringing them under his control. [42] [50] [46] Some of them fled to hiding places beneath the Temple Mount. [51] Before attacking the Third Wall, Titus offered peace terms, but the offer was rejected. [36] Internal fighting briefly reignited, with John concentrating on defending the temple complex while Simon fought on two fronts, disrupting the Roman siegeworks. [52] The two factions seemingly reached a truce shortly thereafter. [53] When the Romans completed their siegeworks, the Jews launched an attack, initially gaining the upper hand but eventually being dispersed by Roman cavalry. During the skirmish, the Idumaean leader John ben Sosas was killed, and the first instance of crucifixion took place. [53]
After fifteen days of unsuccessful attempts by the Jews to burn the Roman siege engines, the Roman battering ram finally breached Jerusalem's third wall, forcing the defenders to retreat. [54] The Romans quickly made preparations for the next assault, and within five days, their battering ram breached the middle section of the second wall. [55] However, the resulting narrow gap left the Roman soldiers who entered the city trapped in its winding alleys. [56] Exploiting their familiarity with their hometown, Jewish defenders inflicted significant losses on the invaders. [57] [55] Forced to retreat, the Romans managed to re-enter this part of the city four days later, creating a larger breach that allowed a greater force to enter, ultimately enabling them to capture the area. [58] The Romans then destroyed the city's northern section and took several days to rest. [59] Meanwhile, more Jews deserted the city. [59]
Titus constructed siege ramps at the Antonia Fortress and the towers of the Upper City, also employing psychological warfare. [60] For four days, he showcased Roman military strength through a parade of cavalry and infantry in polished armor as they received their pay. [58] He also renewed peace offers through Josephus, who addressed the people in their "ancestral tongue", likely Hebrew or possibly Aramaic. [58] Josephus argued that the Romans respected Jewish sacred places, while the Jews themselves were bent on their destruction. He urged them to repent, asserting that God had sided with the Romans, which accounted for their success. [61] [62] When his appeal was mocked and attacked, he elaborated on Jewish history, arguing that only God could save the Jews from their plight, but their sins and conduct during the war had forfeited divine mercy, resulting in the loss of God's protection. [63] [62]
Within the city, internal violence persisted, with factions attacking those attempting to flee and ransacking wealthy homes for food, often employing torture. [64] Simultaneously, Roman forces tortured and crucified fugitives in view of the city walls—at times in varied positions for soldiers' amusement—resulting in over 500 daily executions that filled the available space for crosses, aiming to intimidate the besieged into surrender. [65] Syrian and Arab auxiliaries reportedly disemboweled refugees in search of swallowed valuables. [66] [67]
With grain prices soaring, people resorted to scavenging scraps in sewers, and a large number of corpses were discarded outside the city. [68] Many in the city died from extreme hunger, while others suffered from related diseases. [69] Josephus mentions children with swollen bellies [70] and deserters who appear to have suffered from dropsy. [71] [69] In Lamentations Rabbah, Eleazar bar Zadok recounts how, despite living many years after the destruction, his father's body never fully recovered. The same work also mentions a woman whose hair fell out due to malnutrition. [72] [69]
Seventeen days into the month of Sivan, Roman siege operations resumed. John of Gischala countered by undermining Roman siege engines at Antonia, digging tunnels beneath them, and setting the supports alight; this caused the siege engines to collapse. [73] In the city's western section, John's forces also destroyed Roman siege equipment. [73] The Romans responded by constructing new engines and encircling Jerusalem with a 5 miles (8.0 km) circumvallation wall made of stone to block supplies and escape routes, reportedly completing this work in just three days, according to Josephus. [73] Some people attempted to flee the city, either by jumping from the walls or by pretending to fight with rocks in order to surrender to the Romans. [74]
Within the besieged city, Simon bar Giora intensified purges, executing elites and then those advocating surrender. Their mutilated bodies were cast beyond the walls. [75] [76] John and his followers plundered the temple, melting down sacred vessels, consuming consecrated food, and distributing sacred oil and wine to supporters. [77] The famine worsened, killing many; Josephus recounts the story of a woman from Perea named Maria, who, after being plundered by rebels, roasted and ate her son. When rebels came, drawn by the smell of food, she offered them the leftovers, leaving them shocked and trembling. [78] [79]
After erecting four siege ramps against Antonia, [80] the Romans breached and captured the fortress, subsequently turning their attention to the temple itself. [81] Initially successful, they were eventually repelled by the Jewish defenders after an intense 12-hour battle. [81] [82] On 17 Tammuz, according to Josephus, the daily temple sacrifice (Tamid) ceased due to a lack of priests, or lambs. [83] [84] Jewish fighters sought refuge in the temple courtyards while Titus, unsuccessfully, renewed peace offers through Josephus. [85] Some members of the priestly and upper classes surrendered, and were sent by Titus to the village of Gophna north of Jerusalem. [86] [87] [88] Later, during the siege, they were called upon, along with Josephus, to persuade their fellow Jews in the city to surrender. According to Josephus, this led to great numbers fleeing to the Romans. [89] [88] The Romans then built four ramps targeting the temple's defenses. [78] Jewish defenders set fire to several stoas connecting the temple to Antonia to obstruct Roman access, while the Romans burned another nearby stoa. [90] After several days of failed attempts to breach the temple's stones with battering rams, the Romans set fire to its gates and surrounding porticoes. [91] The Jewish defenders retreated to the inner court. According to Josephus, at this stage, Titus convened his commanders to decide the temple's fate. [92]
On the eighth day of the month of Av, Roman forces breached the temple's outer court. [93] According to Josephus, on the tenth of Av, a Roman soldier hurled a burning piece of wood into the northern chamber, igniting a fire that ultimately consumed the entire temple structure. [94] [93] [95] Josephus claims that Titus attempted to halt the fire, but his soldiers ignored or disobeyed his orders; however, this claim is contested by both ancient sources [96] [97] and modern scholars. [98] [99] As a result, the question of whether the destruction was deliberate or accidental, and in particular, Titus' role in the destruction, remains unsettled. [98]
As the temple burned, chaos erupted in its courtyards. Josephus describes how some priests, overwhelmed by grief and despair at the sight of the temple engulfed in flames, leapt into the fire. [100] Cassius Dio recounts that as the temple burned and defeat became inevitable, many Jews chose suicide, viewing it as a form of victory and salvation to die alongside the temple. [101] [102] Roman soldiers looted and killed indiscriminately, showing no regard for whether individuals begged for mercy or resisted their advance. [103] At one point, many Jews, including poor women and children (approximately 6,000, according to Josephus), sought refuge in a colonnade in the outer court. The Romans set the structure ablaze, and all perished. [104] [105] Josephus attributes the tragedy to "false prophets" who urged people to ascend the Temple Mount, claiming it would bring salvation. [104] The Romans then moved to systematically destroy the rest of the Temple Mount, [106] razing the remaining porticoes, treasuries, and gates. [107] [100] The soldiers carried their military standards into the temple court, offering sacrifices before them. [108] [100] They then hailed Titus as imperator, looted the remaining valuables before the temple was fully consumed, and seized such an immense amount of plunder that the gold standard in Syria reportedly depreciated by half. [108]
Josephus' claim that the temple's destruction was the result of chaos and the impulse of a single soldier, rather than a deliberate decision, has been met with skepticism and sparked debate among scholars. [99] [98] Josephus reports that, earlier, when consulting with his officers, Titus had decided against those advocating for the temple's destruction, believing that Rome should preserve such a magnificent structure and retain it as an ornament of Roman rule. [109] [92] When the temple was set on fire, Josephus states that Titus, having been woken from a nap, rushed to the scene and ordered the fire to be put out. [110] However, amidst the chaos, his soldiers either did not hear or ignored his orders, with some encouraging others to add to the flames. [95] Titus and his officers entered the temple, viewing the heikhal and the Holy of Holies. He again ordered the fire extinguished, but the soldiers, driven by chaos, hatred, and greed, ignored him, continuing to loot and burn the structure. [111] Josephus' account has received support from some scholars, with Goodman arguing that it could be plausible, particularly given the difficulty of containing a fire in the intense heat of Jerusalem during the summer. [99] Modern scholarship, however, generally tends to reject Josephus' account. [98]
A contrasting account comes from the 4th-century Christian historian Sulpicius Severus, who, possibly drawing on Tacitus, [a] claims that Titus intentionally ordered the temple's destruction to eradicate Jewish and Christian faiths. [112] [96] Additional sources, including Valerius Flaccus and the Babylonian Talmud, [113] also suggest that Titus may have been directly responsible for the temple's destruction. [97] Given that temple destruction was considered sacrilegious in antiquity, [b] some scholars propose that Josephus may have downplayed Titus' involvement to protect his reputation. [99]
With the destruction of the temple complex, the Romans began systematically destroying Jerusalem. [115] [116] Titus rejected offers from Simon bar Giora and John of Gischala to leave the city for the desert. Instead, he ordered the razing of extensive sections of Jerusalem, including the Acra, the Ophel, the council chamber of the Sanhedrin, with the destruction and fire reaching the palaces built by the royalty of Adiabene. [117] Soon, the entire Lower City, extending down to the Pool of Siloam, was set ablaze. [118] [119]
On the 20th of Av, the Romans launched an assault on the wealthy neighborhood of the Upper City. The Idumeans sought reconciliation with Titus; some were killed and arrested by Simon bar Giora. [120] At this time, a captured priest and temple treasurer surrendered various temple treasures to the Romans, including golden lampstands, tables, sacred vessels, priestly garments, clothes and spices. [121] [122] Within eighteen days, the Romans completed their siege ramp, prompting Jews to flee into underground hideouts while the soldiers indiscriminately massacred people in the streets and homes. [123]
With the city's fall, Titus ordered its systematic destruction. [115] [124] According to Josephus, Titus "ordered the whole city and temple to be razed to the ground," leaving intact just the three towers of Herod's palace to exhibit the city's former grandeur and the western wall to safeguard the Roman garrison stationed there. However, "all the rest of the wall encompassing the city was so completely leveled to the ground as to leave future visitors to the spot no ground for believing that it had ever been inhabited." [125] [124] He writes:
Now as soon as the army had no more people to slay or to plunder, because there remained none to be the objects of their fury (for they would not have spared any, had there remained any other work to be done), [Titus] Caesar gave orders that they should now demolish the entire city and temple, but should leave as many of the towers standing as they were of the greatest eminence; that is, Phasaelus, and Hippicus, and Mariamne; and so much of the wall enclosed the city on the west side. This wall was spared, in order to afford a camp for such as were to lie in garrison [in the Upper City], as were the towers [the three forts] also spared, in order to demonstrate to posterity what kind of city it was, and how well fortified, which the Roman valor had subdued; but for all the rest of the wall [surrounding Jerusalem], it was so thoroughly laid even with the ground by those that dug it up to the foundation, that there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it [Jerusalem] had ever been inhabited. This was the end which Jerusalem came to by the madness of those that were for innovations; a city otherwise of great magnificence, and of mighty fame among all mankind. [126]
And truly, the very view itself was a melancholy thing; for those places which were adorned with trees and pleasant gardens, were now become desolate country every way, and its trees were all cut down. Nor could any foreigner that had formerly seen Judaea and the most beautiful suburbs of the city, and now saw it as a desert, but lament and mourn sadly at so great a change. For the war had laid all signs of beauty quite waste. Nor had anyone who had known the place before, had come on a sudden to it now, would he have known it again. But though he [a foreigner] were at the city itself, yet would he have inquired for it. [127]
The historical account provided by Josephus is well supported by archaeological evidence from 70 CE, uncovered throughout the remains of the ancient city. [128] [129] [130] Ronny Reich wrote that "While remains relating to the destruction of the Temple are scant, those pertaining to the Temple Mount walls and their close vicinity, the Upper City, the western part of the city, and the Tyropoeon Valley are considerable. [...] It was found that in most cases the archaeological record coincides with the historical description, pointing to Josephus' reliability". [130]
In the 1970s and 1980s, a team led by Nahman Avigad discovered traces of great fire that damaged the Upper City's residential buildings. The fires consumed all organic matter. In houses where there was a beamed ceiling between the floors, the fire caused the top of the building to collapse, along with the top rows of stone, and they buried everything that remained in the home under them. There are buildings where traces remain only in part of the house, and there are buildings that have been completely burned. Calcium oxides have been discovered in several locations, indicating that a lengthy burning damaged the limestones. The Burnt House in the Herodian Quarter, for example, shows signs of a fire that raged at the site during the city's destruction. [130] [131]
The fire left its mark even on household utensils and objects that were in the same buildings. Limestone vessels were stained with ash or even burned and turned into lime, glass vessels exploded and warped from the heat of the fire until they could not be recovered in the laboratory. In contrast, pottery and basalt survived. The layer of ash and charred wood left over from the fires reached an average height of about a meter, and the rock falls reached up to two meters and more. [130] The great urban drainage channel and the Pool of Siloam in the Lower City became clogged with silt and stopped working, [132] [133] and the city walls collapsed in numerous places. [133]
At the base of the Temple Mount walls, large stones and rubble, toppled by the Romans during their razing of the temple complex, have been uncovered. [128] Near the southern section of the Western Wall, massive stones from the temple complex were discovered, having been thrown onto the Herodian street running alongside the wall. [133] [134] Among these stones is the Trumpeting Place inscription, a monumental Hebrew inscription which was thrown down by Roman legionnaires during the destruction of the temple. [135]
After Jerusalem's fall, Titus ordered the killing of those who resisted, while many elderly and weak prisoners were massacred despite his orders. [115] Younger survivors were confined on the Temple Mount, where their fate was determined: rebels and brigands were executed, the tallest and most handsome were selected for Titus' triumph in Rome, prisoners over 17 were sent in chains to Egypt, many were distributed across the empire for execution by the sword or wild animals, and those under 17 were sold into slavery. [136] Starvation claimed many lives in captivity; Josephus claimed to have saved his brother, as well as many friends. [136] The Romans searched underground tunnels, killing survivors and discovering the corpses of those who had starved or killed one another, and engaged in looting. [137] Eusebius stated that Vespasian ordered the eradication of all members of the Davidic line, to prevent any potential Jewish royal resurgence. [138] [137]
John of Gischala surrendered and was sentenced to life imprisonment. [137] Simon Bar Giora was caught after he and his companions, hiding in an underground passage, ran low on food. He emerged at the site of the destroyed temple, dressed in a white tunic and purple mantle. [139] Terentius Rufus had him captured and sent to Titus in Caesarea. [140]
Before arriving in Rome, Titus embarked on a regional victory tour. [141] In Caesarea Philippi, he staged spectacles featuring war prisoners, including executions by wild animals and gladiatorial combat. He later marked his brother's birthday in Caesarea, where 2,500 Jewish captives were killed in similar games. [142] [143] More captives were executed during Vespasian's birthday celebrations in Berytus. [143] The temple treasures, including the Menorah and the Table of the Bread of God's Presence, were paraded through Rome during the triumphal procession in summer 71, alongside hundreds of chained Jewish prisoners, including Simon Bar Giora, who was executed as the leading figure of the rebellion. [144] [145]
In the summer of 71 CE, [146] [147] a year after the city's fall, a triumph was held in Rome to celebrate the Roman victory. [26] [148] This triumph was unique in Roman history, being the only one dedicated to subjugating an existing province's population. [149] [147] It is also the most thoroughly documented Imperial triumph, [26] [150] [151] described in vivid detail in Josephus' account in Book VII of The Jewish War. [152] The triumph drew a vast crowd, with one scholar estimating the number of spectators at around 300,000 or more. [153] [146]
At dawn, Vespasian and Titus, adorned in laurel crowns and purple robes, emerged from the Temple of Isis in the Campus Martius, and proceeded to the Porticus Octaviae, where they were met by senators, chief magistrates, and equestrian order members. [146] A tribunal with ivory chairs, traditionally reserved for magistrates and priests with imperium, had been prepared, where Vespasian and Titus took their seats, unarmed and crowned with bays. [146] In response to the acclamations by troops, Vespasian signaled for silence, and offered prayers of thanksgiving, followed by Titus. [146] After dismissing the troops to breakfast, they proceeded to the Porta Triumphalis, performed sacrifices, donned triumphal robes, and began the procession. [146]
The procession showcased an elaborate array of artworks, including purple tapestries, rugs, gems, divine statues, and decorated animals. [154] Multi-story scaffolds displayed golden frames, ivory work, and tapestries illustrating scenes from the war. [155] Vespasian and Titus rode together in triumphal chariots, with Domitian riding beside them separately. [156] [157] Particularly significant were sacred items from the temple, such as the menorah, the golden Table of Showbread, and Jewish religious texts. [158] 700 Jewish captives were paraded as symbols of conquest, according to Josephus, "to make a display of their own destruction". [159] [142] [160] The triumph culminating in the execution of Simon bar Giora who was scourged and hanged at the Mamertine Prison in accordance with Roman custom. [157]
After the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the city and its temple, there were still a few strongholds in which the rebels continued holding out, at Herodium, Machaerus, and Masada. [161] Both Herodium and Machaerus fell to the Roman army within the next two years, with Masada remaining as the final stronghold of the Judean rebels. In 73/74 CE, the Romans breached the walls of Masada and captured the fortress, with Josephus claiming that nearly all of the Jewish defenders had committed mass suicide prior to the entry of the Romans. [162] With the fall of Masada, the First Jewish–Roman War came to an end.
Josephus wrote that 1.1 million people, the majority of them Jewish, were killed during the siege – a death toll he attributes to the celebration of Passover. [163] Josephus goes on to report that after the Romans killed the armed and elderly people, 97,000 were enslaved. [164] Josephus records that many people were sold into slavery, and that of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, 40,000 individuals survived, and the emperor let them go wherever they chose. [165] Before and during the siege, according to Josephus' account, there were multiple waves of desertions from the city. [166]
Tacitus later wrote:
The total number of the besieged of every age and both sexes was six hundred thousand; there were arms for all who could use them, and the number ready to fight was larger than could have been anticipated from the total population. Both men and women showed the same determination; and if they were to be forced to change their home, they feared life more than death. [167]
Josephus' death toll figures have been widely criticized as exaggerated by modern scholars. Seth Schwartz, for instance, estimates that Palestine's total population at the time was around one million, with roughly half being Jewish, and notes that sizable Jewish communities remained in the region after the war, even in Judea, despite its devastation. [168] [c] Guy Rogers, meanwhile, suggests that a more reasonable estimate for the number of deaths during the siege is tens of thousands, possibly around 20,000–30,000. [169]
It has also been noted that the revolt had not deterred pilgrims from visiting Jerusalem, and a large number became trapped in the city and perished during the siege. [170] Many of the people of the surrounding area are also thought to have been driven from the land or enslaved. [171]
Following the revolt, the ruins of Jerusalem were garrisoned by Legio X Fretensis, which remained stationed there for nearly two centuries. [172] [173] Their presence in the ruined city is well attested through various inscriptions, tiles, and bricks bearing the legion's stamp, though the exact location of their encampment within the city remains unknown. [174] The city largely remained in ruins until the 130s CE, when it was rebuilt as Aelia Capitolina on the orders of Emperor Hadrian. [175]
The establishment of a Roman garrison in the ruins likely discouraged Jews from returning to reside there. [174] Josephus noted that Titus compensated him with properties elsewhere, as those in Jerusalem would be of no value due to the Roman military presence. [176] [174] He also wrote that during the revolt, every tree in the vicinity of the city was cut down, leaving the landscape "as bare as virgin soil". [177]
In Josephus's account of Eleazar ben Yair's speech at Masada (73/74 CE), he quotes Eleazar describing the scene in the ruined city, where "hapless old men sit beside the ashes of the shrine, and a few women, reserved by the enemy for basest outrage." [178] [174] Epiphanius, a Christian bishop who flourished in the 4th century, records what may be authentic testimony of a small, impoverished Jewish community residing on Jerusalem's southwest hill between the revolts. [179] [180] Excavations in Shuafat, 4 kilometers north of Jerusalem's Old City, uncovered evidence of a settlement established after the destruction, designed in the Roman style but hosting a substantial Jewish population. At the onset of the Bar Kokhba revolt, the settlement was partially burned, and its inhabitants fled. [181]
The Flavian dynasty celebrated the fall of Jerusalem by building two monumental triumphal arches. The Arch of Titus, which stills stands today, was built c. 82 CE by the Roman Emperor Domitian on Via Sacra, Rome, to commemorate the siege and fall of Jerusalem. [182] The bas-relief on the arch depicts soldiers carrying spoils from the temple, including the menorah, during a victory procession. A second, less known Arch of Titus constructed at the southeast entrance to the Circus Maximus was built by the Senate in 82 CE. Only a few traces of it remain today. [183]
In 75 CE, the Temple of Peace, also known as the Forum of Vespasian, was built under Emperor Vespasian in Rome. The monument was built to celebrate the conquest of Jerusalem and it is said to have housed the temple menorah from Herod's Temple. [184]
The Colosseum, otherwise known as the Flavian Amphitheater, built in Rome between 70 and 82 CE, is believed to have been partially financed by the spoils of the Roman victory over the Jews. Archaeological discoveries have found a block of travertine that bears dowel holes that show the Jewish Wars financed the building of the amphitheater. [185]
The Flavians issued a series of coins, named Judaea Capta ("Judaea has been conquered"), to commemorate their victory. [186] These coins served as a key component of Flavian imperial propaganda throughout the Roman Empire and were produced over a period of 10 to 12 years. [187] The obverse featured portraits of Vespasian or, more frequently, Titus, [187] while the reverse depicted allegorical imagery centered on a mourning female figure representing the conquered Jewish people. [186] She is shown seated beneath a palm tree, a symbol of Judaea. [186] The reverse designs varied, sometimes portraying the female figure bound or kneeling before the victory goddess Nike (Victoria). [187]
Around 130 CE, six decades after the Jerusalem's destruction, a new Roman colony, Aelia Capitolina, was founded on the city's ruins, an act described by historian Martin Goodman as the "final solution for Jewish rebelliousness". [188] The founding of the colony, coupled with the construction of a temple to Jupiter on the Temple Mount, is widely regarded as a key trigger for the Bar Kokhba revolt, which erupted in 132 CE. [189] [175] Supported by the Sanhedrin, Simon Bar Kosiba (later known as Bar Kokhba) established an independent state that was conquered by the Romans in 135 CE. The revolt resulted in the extensive depopulation of central Judea, more so than during the First Jewish–Roman War. [190] The Jewish communities of this region were devastated to an extent which some scholars describe as a genocide. [190] [191] However, the Jewish population remained strong in other parts of Palestine, thriving in Galilee, Golan, Bet Shean Valley, and the eastern, southern, and western edges of Judea. [192] Emperor Hadrian wiped the name Judaea off the map and replaced it with Syria Palaestina. [193] [194] [195]
Following the suppression of the Bar Kokhba revolt, the Romans continued the construction and development of Aelia Capitolina, which became a modest provincial town. [175] The colony was dedicated to Capitoline Jupiter, with temples to Roman deities replacing the city's former Jewish character. [175] Its population consisted primarily of Roman legionaries, veterans, and other non-Jewish settlers. [175] Jews were banned from the city and its surrounding areas. [174]
For the next five centuries, Jews were only permitted to enter Aelia Capitolina on Tisha B'Av to mourn the destruction of the temple. [196] This restriction continued after the Roman Empire's conversion to Christianity. [197] A Christian pilgrim who visited Jerusalem in 333 CE recorded that Jews would come annually to anoint a perforated stone, "bewail themselves with groans, rend their garments, and so depart." [197] A brief exception occurred during Emperor Julian's reign (361–363 CE), when Jews were allowed to return and possibly began reconstructing the temple. However, this project ended when construction materials were destroyed by an earthquake or fire, and Julian died soon after. [196] Jews were permitted to permanently resettle in Jerusalem only after the city was conquered by Umar in the 7th century. [198]
The destruction of the Second Temple is commemorated on Tisha B'Av, a major Jewish fast day that also marks the destruction of the first temple, along with other tragedies in Jewish history, such as the expulsion of Jews from Spain. [199] The Western Wall, the most significant surviving remnant of the Second Temple, is also known as the "Wailing Wall" due to the lamentations of Jews at the site. The structure serves as a symbol of both the destruction of the Jewish homeland and the enduring hope for its restoration. [199]
The destruction of the Second Temple sparked profound questions about its meaning. Drawing from biblical interpretations of Jerusalem's destruction in 586/587 BCE by the Babylonians, many Jews viewed their suffering as a divine consequence of moral or religious transgressions, a belief reinforced by scriptural writings and prophetic teachings. [200] The idea that exile resulted from disobedience, but repentance could restore divine favor had been reinforced when the Persian king Cyrus allowed the Jews to return and rebuild the temple centuries earlier. [200]
Meanwhile, some Jews responded to the catastrophe with asceticism. [201] A rabbinic tradition in the Tosefta Sotah and Babylonian Talmud (Bava Batra 60b) recounts a debate between Joshua ben Hananiah and a group of interlocutors who proposed abstaining from wine and meat, given their former role in temple offerings. [201] Rabbi Joshua countered that this logic would also require giving up bread, fruit, and water, leaving his opponents without a response. [201] The emerging rabbinic approach advocated a balanced response: while Jews were to temper their celebrations in remembrance of the temple's destruction, they were not to adopt excessive mourning that would impede the rhythms of daily life. [201]
The Amoraim attributed the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem as punishment from God for the "baseless" hatred that pervaded Jewish society at the time. [202]
Even after its destruction, Jerusalem retained its importance in Jewish life and culture, becoming a symbol of hope for return, rebuilding, and the renewal of national life. [1] [203] Pilgrimage to the city also continued, evolving in different forms over the centuries. [203] The Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds, compiled in the late 4th and 5th centuries respectively, provide detailed instructions for mourning rituals observed by Jewish pilgrims visiting Jerusalem. These include guidelines on tearing garments and reciting prayers when witnessing the destruction in Judea, Jerusalem, and the Temple. [197] The belief in a Third Temple remains a cornerstone of Orthodox Judaism. [204]
In subsequent centuries, some Jewish communities adopted a new Hebrew calendar that began with the year of the temple's destruction. In Zoara, located south of the Dead Sea (in modern-day Jordan), this system was consistently used in the Jewish section of the town's cemetery. [205] One inscription, for instance, belonging to a woman named Marsa, reads, "she died on the fifth day, 17 days into the month of Elul, the fourth year of shemitah, 362 years after the destruction of the temple." A similar calendar system was adopted by other Jewish communities during late antiquity, starting in the Levant and spreading to diaspora communities, to mark births, marriages, and other significant life events. [205]
A tradition among the Jews of Spain held that the exiles from Jerusalem in 70 CE are responsible for naming the city of Toledo, deriving the name from the Hebrew words toledot or tulaytula, meaning "migration" or "wandering". [206]
According to early Christian tradition, as recorded by Eusebius and Epiphanius, the Jerusalem Church experienced a miraculous revelation shortly before the Jewish revolt. In response, its members reportedly fled to Pella, a city beyond the Jordan River, escaping the city's destruction.
The destruction was an important point in the separation of Christianity from its Jewish roots: many Christians responded by distancing themselves from the rest of Judaism, as reflected in the Gospels, which described Jesus as anti-temple. The destruction of the temple was interpreted by early Christians as the fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy that the temple would be destroyed (in Matthew 24, Luke 21, Mark 13); [207] [208] [209] More broadly, it was seen as a divine sign marking the end of the Mosaic covenant, [210] which was believed to have been superseded by Jesus' atoning sacrifice on the cross. Within the biblical paradigm of sin and judgment, some regarded it as God's punishment for the Jews’ rejection and killing of Jesus. [211] : 30–31 [210] In the face of destruction, Goldenberg suggests that some Jews may have chosen to align with the growing Christian sect within Judaism or adopt some form of polytheism. [212]
The siege and destruction of Jerusalem has inspired writers and artists through the centuries.
Flavius Josephus or Yosef ben Mattityahu was a Roman–Jewish historian and military leader. Best known for writing The Jewish War, he was born in Jerusalem—then part of the Roman province of Judea—to a father of priestly descent and a mother who claimed royal ancestry.
Titus Caesar Vespasianus was Roman emperor from 79 to 81. A member of the Flavian dynasty, Titus succeeded his father Vespasian upon his death, becoming the first Roman emperor ever to succeed his biological father.
The Second Temple was the reconstructed Temple in Jerusalem, in use between c. 516 BCE and its destruction in 70 CE. In its last phase it was enhanced by Herod the Great, the result being later called Herod's Temple. Defining the Second Temple period, it stood as a pivotal symbol of Jewish identity and was central to Second Temple Judaism; it was the chief place of worship, ritual sacrifice (korban), and communal gathering for Jews. As such, it attracted Jewish pilgrims from distant lands during the Three Pilgrimage Festivals: Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot.
The First Jewish–Roman War, sometimes called the Great Jewish Revolt, the First Jewish Revolt, or the Jewish War, was the first of three major rebellions by the Jews against the Roman Empire. Fought in the province of Judaea, it resulted in the destruction of Jerusalem and other cities and towns, the displacement of its population, the appropriation of land, and the destruction of the Jewish Temple and polity.
The Flavian dynasty, lasting from 69 to 96 CE, was the second dynastic line of emperors to rule the Roman Empire following the Julio-Claudians, encompassing the reigns of Vespasian and his two sons, Titus and Domitian. The Flavians rose to power during the civil war of 69 CE, known as the Year of the Four Emperors; after Galba and Otho died in quick succession, Vitellius became emperor in mid 69. His claim to the throne was quickly challenged by legions stationed in the eastern provinces, who declared their commander Vespasian emperor in his place. The Second Battle of Bedriacum tilted the balance decisively in favor of the Flavian forces, who entered Rome on 20 December, and the following day, the Roman Senate officially declared Vespasian emperor, thus commencing the Flavian dynasty. Although the dynasty proved to be short-lived, several significant historic, economic and military events took place during their reign.
The Zealots were a political movement in 1st-century Second Temple Judaism that sought to incite the people of Judaea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the Holy Land by force of arms, most notably during the First Jewish–Roman War (66–70). Zealotry was the term used by Josephus for a "fourth sect" or "fourth Jewish philosophy" during this period.
Tiberius Julius Alexander was an equestrian governor and general in the Roman Empire. Born into a wealthy Jewish family of Alexandria but abandoning or neglecting the Jewish religion, he rose to become the 2nd procurator of Judea under Claudius. While Prefect of Egypt (66–69), he employed his legions against the Alexandrian Jews in a brutal response to ethnic violence, and was instrumental in the Emperor Vespasian's rise to power. In 70, he participated in the Siege of Jerusalem as Titus' second-in-command. He became the most powerful Jew of his age, and is ranked as one of the most prominent Jews in military history.
Gamla, also Gamala, was an ancient Jewish town on the Golan Heights. Believed to have been founded as a Seleucid fort during the Syrian Wars, it transitioned into a predominantly Jewish settlement that came under Hasmonean rule in 81 BCE. The town's name reflects its location on a high, elongated ridge with steep slopes resembling a camel's hump.
The Jewish–Roman wars were a series of large-scale revolts by the Jews of Judaea against the Roman Empire between 66 and 135 CE. The conflict primarily encompasses two major uprisings: the First Jewish–Roman War and the Bar Kokhba revolt, both driven by Jewish aspirations to restore the political independence lost when Rome conquered the Hasmonean kingdom. Some historians also include the Diaspora Revolt, when Jewish communities across the Eastern Mediterranean rose up against Roman rule.
Judaea was a Roman province from 6 to 132 CE, which at its height incorporated the Levantine regions of Judea, Idumea, Samaria, and Galilee, and parts of the costal plain including Philistia, extending over the territories of the Hasmonean and Herodian kingdoms. The name Judaea was derived from the Iron Age Kingdom of Judah, that was centered predominantly in Judea.
Legio X Fretensis was a legion of the Imperial Roman army. It was founded by the young Gaius Octavius in 41/40 BC to fight during the period of civil war that started the dissolution of the Roman Republic. X Fretensis is then recorded to have existed at least until the 410s.
The Kitos War was a Jewish uprising in the province of Judaea during the late 110s CE. Ancient Jewish sources date it to 52 years after Vespasian's war and 16 years before the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–136).
Eleazar ben Simon was a Zealot leader during the First Jewish-Roman War who fought against the armies of Cestius Gallus, Vespasian, and Titus Flavius. From the onset of the war in 66 CE until the destruction of the temple in 70 CE, he fought vehemently against the Roman garrisons in Judea and against his fellow Jewish political opponents in order to establish an independent Jewish state at Jerusalem. Although the Jewish defeat at Jerusalem cannot be entirely attributed to Eleazar ben Simon, his inability to establish unity with John of Gischala and Simon bar Giora resulted in a bitter civil war that weakened the Jewish resistance against Rome. Eleazar ben Simon and his Zealots' radical anti-Roman policies and eradication of the moderate temple aristocracy from Jerusalem in 67 CE also prevented any peaceful agreement with Rome to avoid the death and destruction which ensued in 70 CE.
Jewish military history focuses on the military aspect of history of the Jewish people from ancient times until the modern age.
The Second Temple period or post-exilic period in Jewish history denotes the approximately 600 years during which the Second Temple stood in the city of Jerusalem. It began with the return to Zion and subsequent reconstruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, and ended with the First Jewish–Roman War and the Roman siege of Jerusalem.
Judea or Judaea is a mountainous region of the Levant. Traditionally dominated by the city of Jerusalem, it is now part of Palestine and Israel. The name's usage is historic, having been used in antiquity and still into the present day; it originates from Yehudah, a Hebrew name. Yehudah was a son of Jacob, who was later given the name "Israel" and whose sons collectively headed the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Yehudah's progeny among the Israelites formed the Tribe of Judah, with whom the Kingdom of Judah is associated. Related nomenclature continued to be used under the rule of the Babylonians, the Persians, the Greeks, and the Romans. Under the Hasmoneans, the Herodians, and the Romans, the term was applied to an area larger than Judea of earlier periods. In 132 CE, the Roman province of Judaea was merged with Galilee to form the enlarged province of Syria Palaestina.
Jerusalem during the Second Temple period describes the history of the city during the existence there of the Second Temple, from the return to Zion under Cyrus the Great to the siege and destruction the city by Titus during the First Jewish–Roman War in 70 CE. During this period, which saw the region and city change hands several times, Jerusalem was the center of religious life for all Jews; even those who lived in the diaspora prayed towards Jerusalem on a daily basis and went there on pilgrimage during three annual religious festivals. Under Hasmonean and Herodian rule, Jerusalem served as a royal capital and the seat of all major national institutions. In Jerusalem, the Pharisees of Second Temple Judaism developed into the Tannaim and Judaism's post-Exilic religious identity as it continues today, and the Hebrew Bible was perhaps canonized, although exactly when this occurred remains disputed. It was also in Jerusalem during the later stages of this period that Christianity was born.
The Zealot Temple siege was a short siege of the Temple in Jerusalem fought between Jewish factions during the First Jewish–Roman War. According to the historian Josephus, the forces of Ananus ben Ananus, one of the heads of the Judean provisional government and former High Priest of Israel, besieged the Zealots who held the Temple. When John of Gischala led the Zealots to believe that Ananus had contacted the Roman general Vespasian for assistance in retaking control of all Jerusalem, the Zealots, driven to desperation, asked the Edomites (Idumeans) for assistance in preventing the delivery of the city to the Romans. When the Edomites arrived, the Zealots opened the gates of Jerusalem to them, and the Edomites slaughtered ben Hanan's forces, killing him as well.
The history of the Jews in the Roman Empire traces the interaction of Jews and Romans during the period of the Roman Empire. A Jewish diaspora had migrated to Rome and to the territories of Roman Europe from the land of Israel, Anatolia, Babylon and Alexandria in response to economic hardship and incessant warfare over the land of Israel between the Ptolemaic and Seleucid empires from the 4th to the 1st centuries BC. In Rome, Jewish communities thrived economically. Jews became a significant part of the Roman Empire's population in the first century AD, with some estimates as high as 7 million people; however, this estimation has been questioned.
The siege of Yodfat was a 47-day siege by Roman forces of the Jewish town of Yodfat which took place in 67 CE, during the Great Revolt. Led by Roman General Vespasian and his son Titus, both future emperors, the siege ended with the sacking of the town, the deaths of most of its inhabitants and the enslavement of the rest. It was the second bloodiest battle of the revolt, surpassed only by the Siege of Jerusalem, and the longest except for Jerusalem and Masada. The siege was chronicled by Josephus, who had personally commanded the Jewish forces at Yodfat and was subsequently captured by the Romans.
The historical description is consistent with the archeological finds. Collapses of massive stones from the walls of the Temple Mount were exposed lying over the Herodian street running along the Western Wall of the Temple Mount. The residential buildings of the Ophel and the Upper City were destroyed by great fire. The large urban drainage channel and the Pool of Siloam in the Lower City silted up and ceased to function, and in many places the city walls collapsed. ... Following the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 CE, a new era began in the city's history. The Herodian city was destroyed and a military camp of the Tenth Roman Legion established on part of the ruins. In c. 130 CE, the Roman emperor Hadrian founded a new city in place of Herodian Jerusalem next to the military camp. He honored the city with the status of a colony and named it Aelia Capitolina and possibly also forbidding Jews from entering its boundaries
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)These texts, combined with the relics of those who hid in caves along the western side of the Dead Sea, tells us a great deal. What is clear from the evidence of both skeletal remains and artefacts is that the Roman assault on the Jewish population of the Dead Sea was so severe and comprehensive that no one came to retrieve precious legal documents, or bury the dead. Up until this date the Bar Kokhba documents indicate that towns, villages and ports where Jews lived were busy with industry and activity. Afterwards there is an eerie silence, and the archaeological record testifies to little Jewish presence until the Byzantine era, in En Gedi. This picture coheres with what we have already determined in Part I of this study, that the crucial date for what can only be described as genocide, and the devastation of Jews and Judaism within central Judea, was 135 CE and not, as usually assumed, 70 CE, despite the siege of Jerusalem and the temple's destruction
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link){{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2025 (link){{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2025 (link)