Federated Learning of Cohorts

Last updated

Federated Learning of Cohorts
AbbreviationFLoC
StatusReplaced by Browsing Topics API
Year started2019
Organization Google
Series Privacy Sandbox
Website privacysandbox.com/proposals/floc/

Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC) is a type of web tracking. It groups people into "cohorts" based on their browsing history for the purpose of interest-based advertising. [1] [2] FLoC was being developed as a part of Google's Privacy Sandbox initiative, [3] which includes several other advertising-related technologies with bird-themed names. [1] [4] : 48  Despite "federated learning" in the name, FLoC does not utilize any federated learning. [5]

Contents

Google began testing the technology in Chrome 89 [6] released in March 2021 as a replacement for third-party cookies. By April 2021, every major browser aside from Google Chrome that is based on Google's open-source Chromium platform had declined to implement FLoC. The technology was criticized on privacy grounds by groups including the Electronic Frontier Foundation and DuckDuckGo, and has been described as anti-competitive; it generated an antitrust response in multiple countries as well as questions about General Data Protection Regulation compliance. In July 2021, Google quietly suspended development of FLoC; [7] Chrome 93, [8] released on August 31, 2021, became the first version which disabled FLoC, but did not remove the internal programming. [9]

On January 25, 2022, Google officially announced it had ended development of FLoC technologies and proposed the new Topics API to replace it. [10] [11] Brave developers criticized Topics API as a rebranding of FLoC with only minor changes and without addressing their main concerns. [12]

Function

FLoC in Google Chrome components. Federated-Learning-of-Cohorts-in-google-chrome.png
FLoC in Google Chrome components.

The Federated Learning of Cohorts algorithm analyzes users' online activity within the browser, and generates a "cohort ID" using the SimHash algorithm [13] to group a given user with other users who access similar content. [14] : 9  Each cohort contains several thousand users in order to make identifying individual users more difficult, [15] and cohorts are updated weekly. [16] Websites are then able to access the cohort ID using an API [14] : 9  and determine what advertisements to serve. [17] Google does not label cohorts based on interest beyond grouping users and assigning an ID, [1] so advertisers need to determine the user types of each cohort on their own. [4] : 47 

Opting out of cohort calculation

FLoC experiment was active only in Google Chrome browser and ran from Chrome 89 [6] (inclusive) to Chrome 93 (not inclusive). Modern browsers do not support FLoC. While the experiment was active, users could opt out of FLoC experiment by disabling third-party cookies. Website administrators could opt out from cohort calculation via special HTTP headers. It can be accomplished with a new interest-cohort permissions policy or feature policy, the default behavior is to allow cohort calculation. To opt-out of all FLoC cohort calculations a website could send either of the following HTTP response headers: [18] 

Permissions-Policy: browsing-topics=()

or

Feature-Policy: browsing-topics 'none'

Google Chrome applies interest-cohort Feature Policy restrictions to Browsing Topics API as well. [19]

Timeline

Initial prototype

On August 22, 2019, Google Chrome developers coined the term FLoC and first started discussing the upcoming replacement for cookies. [20] In July 2020, the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority found the FLoC proposal to be anti-competitive, since it would "place the browser in a vital gatekeeper position for the adtech ecosystem." Instead, the authority recommended adoption of a competing proposal called SPARROW, which maintains the same privacy-enhancing objectives but creates a different completely independent "Gatekeeper" which does not have any other role in the adtech ecosystem and does not have access to user-level information. [21]

Testing

Google began testing FLoC in the Chrome 89 [6] released in March 2021 [16] as a replacement for third-party cookies, [22] which Google plans to stop supporting in Chrome by mid-2023. [23] (Initially Google announced plans to remove third-party cookies by late 2021, [17] then postponed it to early 2022, [2] and then to 2023 due to delay of FLoC technology.) The initial trial turned on FLoC for 0.5% of Chrome users across 10 countries: [16] the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand and the Philippines. [24] Users were automatically placed in the trial and were not notified, but could opt out by turning off third-party cookies. Furthermore, site administrators could disable FLoC and opt out from interest calculation via a Feature-Policy header.[ citation needed ] The initial trial did not include users in the United Kingdom or the European Economic Area due to concerns about legality under the area's privacy regulations. [25]

FLoC shutdown

In July 2021, Google suspended development of FLoC; Chrome 93, released on August 31, 2021, became the first version which rendered FLoC feature void, but did not remove the internal programming. [9] [7] Chrome 100, released on March 29, 2022, removed most of old FLoC code. [26]

Topics API

On January 25, 2022, Google officially announced it had ended development of FLoC APIs and proposed a new Topics API to replace it. [10] [11] This API would use three weeks of the browser's history to identify user interests based on defined topics. Participating websites could then call this API to get three topics which could be used to tailor advertising. [27] Developers of the Brave web browser called Topics API a "rebranding [of] FLoC without addressing key privacy issues. [28]

Reactions

Google claimed in January 2021 that FLoC was at least 95% effective compared to tracking using third-party cookies, but AdExchanger reported that some people in the advertising technology industry expressed skepticism about the claim and the methodology behind it. [29] As every website that opts into FLoC will have the same access about which cohort the user belongs to, the technology's developers say this democratizes access to some information about a user's general browser history, in contrast to the status quo, where websites have to use tracking techniques. [30] [13]

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has criticized FLoC, with one EFF researcher calling the testing of the technology in Chrome "a concrete breach of user trust in service of a technology that should not exist" in a post on the organization's blog. [31] [32] The EFF also created a website which allows Chrome users to check whether FLoC is being tested in their browsers. [33] The EFF criticized the fact that every site will be able to access data about a user, without having to track them across the web first. [34] Additionally on the EFF blog, Cory Doctorow praised Chrome's planned removal of third-party cookies, but added that "[just] because FLoC is billed as pro-privacy and also criticized as anti-competitive, it doesn't mean that privacy and competition aren't compatible", stating that Google is "appointing itself the gatekeeper who decides when we're spied on while skimming from advertisers with nowhere else to go." [35]

On April 10, 2021, the CEO of DuckDuckGo released a statement telling people not to use Google Chrome, stating that Chrome users can be included in FLoC without choosing to be and that no other browser vendor has expressed interest in using the tracking method. [36] The statement said that "there is no such thing as a behavioral tracking mechanism imposed without consent that respects people's privacy" and that Google should make FLoC "explicitly opt-in" and "free of dark patterns". [37] DuckDuckGo also announced that its website will not collect FLoC IDs or use them to target ads, [38] and updated its Chrome extension to block websites from interacting with FLoC. [36]

On April 12, 2021, Brave, a web browser built on the Chromium platform, criticized FLoC in a blog post and announced plans to disable FLoC in the Brave browser and make company's main website opt out of FLoC. [39] The blog post, co-written by the company's CEO Brendan Eich, described Google's efforts to replace third-party cookies as "Titanic-level deckchair-shuffling" and "a step backward from more fundamental, privacy-and-user focused changes the Web needs." [40] [41]

Tech and media news site The Verge noted that not all possible repercussions of FLoC for ad tech are known, and that its structure could benefit or harm smaller ad tech companies, noting specifically that larger ad tech companies may be better equipped to "parse what FLoCs mean and what ads to target against them." [1]

Multiple companies including GitHub, Drupal and Amazon declined to enable FLoC, instead opting to disable FLoC outright by including the HTTP Header Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=(). [42] [43] [44] WordPress, a widely used website framework floated a proposal to disable FLoC based tracking across all websites that used the framework. [45]

Almost all major browser based on Google's open-source Chromium platform declined to implement FLoC, including Microsoft Edge, Vivaldi, Brave, and Opera. [46]

In May 2021, The Economist reported that it may be hard for Google to "stop the system from grouping people by characteristics they wish to keep private, such as race or sexuality." [16]

Fingerprinting concerns

In May 2021, The Economist said some critics have suggested that the cohort system will facilitate fingerprinting of individual devices, compromising privacy. [16]

Wired magazine additionally reported that FLoC could "be used as a point of entry for fingerprinting". [15]

Mozilla, the creators of the Firefox browser, expressed concerns that FLoC can be used as an additional fingerprinting vector. Furthermore, they stated that a user's FLoC group can be tracked during multiple visits and correlated via different means and, based on a user's membership in multiple FLoC cohorts, a website might be able to infer information about the user which FLoC aimed to keep private. Since a FLoC cohort is shared across websites, its ID might be abused as an alternative to a unique cookie in third-party contexts. [47]

Antitrust response

In July 2020, the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority found that the FLoC proposal "place[s] the browser in a vital gatekeeper position for the adtech ecosystem." [21]

In March 2021, 15 attorneys general of U.S. states and Puerto Rico amended an antitrust complaint filed in December; the updated complaint says that Google Chrome's phase-out of third-party cookies in 2022 [48] will "disable the primary cookie-tracking technology almost all non-Google publishers currently use to track users and target ads. Then [...] Chrome, will offer [...] new and alternative tracking mechanisms [...] dubbed Privacy Sandbox. Overall, the changes are anticompetitive". [49] [50]

In June 2021, EU antitrust regulators launched a formal investigation to assess whether Google violated competition rules, with a focus on display advertising, notably whether it restricts access to user data by third parties while reserving it for its own use. Among the things that will be investigated is Google's plan to prohibit the placement of third-party cookies and replace them with the Privacy Sandbox set of tools. [51]

GDPR compliance

As of April 2021, Google was not testing FLoC in the United Kingdom or the European Economic Area due to concerns about compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation and the ePrivacy Directive. [52] [25] [53]

Johannes Caspar, the Data Protection Commissioner of Hamburg, Germany, told Wired UK that FLoC "leads to several questions concerning the legal requirements of the GDPR," explaining that FLoC "could be seen as an act of processing personal data" which requires "freely given consent and clear and transparent information about these operations." A spokesperson of the French National Commission on Informatics and Liberty said that the FLoC system would require "specific, informed and unambiguous consent". [52]

As of April 2021, the Irish Data Protection Commission, which is the lead data supervisor for Google under GDPR, [25] was consulting with Google about the FLoC proposal. [52]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HTTP cookie</span> Small pieces of data stored by a web browser while on a website

HTTP cookies are small blocks of data created by a web server while a user is browsing a website and placed on the user's computer or other device by the user's web browser. Cookies are placed on the device used to access a website, and more than one cookie may be placed on a user's device during a session.

A browser extension is a software module for customizing a web browser. Browsers typically allow users to install a variety of extensions, including user interface modifications, cookie management, ad blocking, and the custom scripting and styling of web pages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google Chrome</span> Web browser developed by Google

Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google. It was first released in 2008 for Microsoft Windows, built with free software components from Apple WebKit and Mozilla Firefox. Versions were later released for Linux, macOS, iOS, iPadOS, and also for Android, where it is the default browser. The browser is also the main component of ChromeOS, where it serves as the platform for web applications.

Google Native Client (NaCl) is a discontinued sandboxing technology for running either a subset of Intel x86, ARM, or MIPS native code, or a portable executable, in a sandbox. It allows safely running native code from a web browser, independent of the user operating system, allowing web apps to run at near-native speeds, which aligns with Google's plans for ChromeOS. It may also be used for securing browser plugins, and parts of other applications or full applications such as ZeroVM.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DuckDuckGo</span> American software company and Web search engine

DuckDuckGo is an American software company focused on online privacy, whose flagship product is a search engine of the same name. Founded by Gabriel Weinberg in 2008, its later products include browser extensions and a custom DuckDuckGo web browser. Headquartered in Paoli, Pennsylvania, DuckDuckGo is a privately held company with about 200 employees. The company's name is a reference to the children's game duck, duck, goose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chromium (web browser)</span> Open-source web browser project

Chromium is a free and open-source web browser project, primarily developed and maintained by Google. It is a widely-used codebase, providing the vast majority of code for Google Chrome and many other browsers, including Microsoft Edge, Samsung Internet, and Opera. The code is also used by several app frameworks.

Web tracking is the practice by which operators of websites and third parties collect, store and share information about visitors' activities on the World Wide Web. Analysis of a user's behaviour may be used to provide content that enables the operator to infer their preferences and may be of interest to various parties, such as advertisers. Web tracking can be part of visitor management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epic (web browser)</span> Indian Web Browser based on chromium

Epic is an Indian proprietary privacy-centric web browser developed by Hidden Reflex using Chromium source code. Epic is always in private browsing mode, and exiting the browser deletes all browser data. The browser's developers claim that Google's tracking code has been removed, and that blocks other companies from tracking the user.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comodo Dragon</span> Web browser based on the Chromium web browser

Comodo Dragon is a freeware web browser. It is based on Chromium and is produced by Comodo Group. Sporting a similar interface to Google Chrome, Dragon does not implement Chrome's user tracking and some other potentially privacy-compromising features, replacing them with its own user tracking implementations, and provides additional security measures, such as indicating the authenticity and relative strength of a website's Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificate.

Do Not Track (DNT) is a formerly official HTTP header field, designed to allow internet users to opt out of tracking by websites—which includes the collection of data regarding a user's activity across multiple distinct contexts, and the retention, use, or sharing of data derived from that activity outside the context in which it occurred.

HTTPS Everywhere is a discontinued free and open-source browser extension for Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Brave, Vivaldi and Firefox for Android, which was developed collaboratively by The Tor Project and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). It automatically makes websites use a more secure HTTPS connection instead of HTTP, if they support it. The option "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" makes it possible to block and unblock all non-HTTPS browser connections with one click. Due to the widespread adoption of HTTPS on the World Wide Web, and the integration of HTTPS-only mode on major browsers, the extension was retired in January 2023.

A headless browser is a web browser without a graphical user interface.

uBlock Origin Web browser extension

uBlock Origin is a free and open-source browser extension for content filtering, including ad blocking. The extension is available for Chrome, Chromium, Edge, Firefox, Brave, Opera, Pale Moon, as well as versions of Safari before 13. uBlock Origin has received praise from technology websites and is reported to be much less memory-intensive than other extensions with similar functionality. uBlock Origin's stated purpose is to give users the means to enforce their own (content-filtering) choices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brave (web browser)</span> Chromium-based open-source web browser

Brave is a free and open-source web browser developed by Brave Software, Inc. based on the Chromium web browser. Brave is a privacy-focused browser, which automatically blocks most advertisements and website trackers in its default settings. Users can turn on optional ads that reward them for their attention in the form of Basic Attention Tokens (BAT), which can be used as a cryptocurrency or to make donations to registered websites and content creators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Searx</span> Metasearch engine

Searx is a discontinued free and open-source metasearch engine, available under the GNU Affero General Public License version 3, with the aim of protecting the privacy of its users. To this end, Searx does not share users' IP addresses or search history with the search engines from which it gathers results. Tracking cookies served by the search engines are blocked, preventing user-profiling-based results modification. By default, Searx queries are submitted via HTTP POST, to prevent users' query keywords from appearing in webserver logs. Searx was inspired by the Seeks project, though it does not implement Seeks' peer-to-peer user-sourced results ranking.

Third-party cookies are HTTP cookies which are used principally for web tracking as part of the web advertising ecosystem.

ungoogled-chromium is a free and open-source variant of the Chromium web browser that removes all Google-specific web services. It achieves this with a series of patches applied to the Chromium codebase during the compilation process. The result is functionally similar to regular Chromium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Privacy Sandbox</span> Google initiative

The Privacy Sandbox is an initiative led by Google to create web standards for websites to access user information without compromising privacy. Its core purpose is to facilitate online advertising by sharing a subset of user private information without the use of third-party cookies. The initiative includes a number of proposals, many of these proposals have bird-themed names which are changed once the corresponding feature reaches general availability. The technology include Topics API, Protected Audience, Attribution Reporting, Private Aggregation, Shared Storage and Fenced Frames as well as other proposed technologies. The project was announced in August 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brave Search</span> Search engine

Brave Search is a search engine developed by Brave Software, Inc., and is the default search engine for the Brave web browser in certain countries.

Web Environment Integrity (WEI) is an abandoned API proposal previously under development for Google Chrome. A Web Environment Integrity prototype existed in Chromium, but was removed in November 2023 after extensive criticism by many tech groups. Its purpose was to verify that interactions with websites were human and authentic as defined by third-party attesters.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Bohn, Dieter (March 30, 2021). "Privacy and ads in Chrome are about to become FLoCing complicated". The Verge . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  2. 1 2 Burgess, Matt (March 24, 2021). "Google's rivals are fighting back against Chrome's big cookie plan". Wired UK . ISSN   1357-0978 . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  3. ↑ Lomas, Natasha (March 24, 2021). "Google isn't testing FLoCs in Europe yet". TechCrunch . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  4. 1 2 Geradin, Damien; Katsifis, Dimitrios; Karanikioti, Theano (November 25, 2020). "Google as a de facto Privacy Regulator: Analyzing Chrome's Removal of Third-party Cookies from an Antitrust Perspective". Tilburg Law and Economics Center (DP2020-038). Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3738107. ISSN   1572-4042. S2CID   234583355. SSRN   3738107.
  5. ↑ "The Topics API - Evolution from FLoC". patcg-individual-drafts. GitHub. March 24, 2022. Archived from the original on January 25, 2022. FLoC didn't actually use Federated learning
  6. 1 2 3 "Federated Learning of Cohorts". Chrome Platform Status. January 26, 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  7. 1 2 Karlin, Josh. "The Topics API - Evolution from FLoC". patcg-individual-drafts. GitHub . Retrieved January 26, 2022. FLoC ended its experiment in July of 2021.
  8. ↑ Xiao, Yao (July 26, 2021). "[floc] Disable floc computation. Remove fieldtrial testing config. · chromium/chromium@5d059e4". GitHub. Archived from the original on October 31, 2023. Retrieved September 29, 2023.
  9. 1 2 "Issue 1230149: Disable floc computation". bugs.chromium.org. August 26, 2021. Retrieved September 29, 2023.
  10. 1 2 Roth, Emma (January 25, 2022). "Google abandons FLoC, introduces Topics API to replace tracking cookies". The Verge. Retrieved January 25, 2022.
  11. 1 2 Li, Abner (January 25, 2022). "Google drops FLoC and proposes new Topics API for replacing third-party cookies used by ads". 9to5Google . Retrieved January 25, 2022.
  12. ↑ Snyder, Peter (January 25, 2022). "Rebranding FLoC Without Addressing Key Privacy Issues". Brave . Archived from the original on July 2, 2024. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  13. 1 2 Cyphers, Bennett (March 3, 2021). "Google's FLoC Is a Terrible Idea". Electronic Frontier Foundation . Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  14. 1 2 Geradin, Damien; Katsifis, Dimitrios (February 19, 2020). "Taking a Dive Into Google's Chrome Cookie Ban". Tilburg Law and Economics Center (DP2020-042). Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3541170. ISSN   1572-4042. S2CID   216269022. SSRN   3541170.
  15. 1 2 Nield, David (May 9, 2021). "What's Google FLoC? And How Does It Affect Your Privacy?". Wired . ISSN   1059-1028 . Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 "Why is FLoC, Google's new ad technology, taking flak?". The Economist . May 17, 2021. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  17. 1 2 Morris, Ian (April 1, 2021). "Google Chrome FLoC is replacing cookies — what it means for your privacy". Tom's Guide . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  18. ↑ "1158851 - chromium - An open-source project to help move the web forward. - Monorail". bugs.chromium.org. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  19. ↑ Dutton, Sam (March 22, 2022). "Clarify interest-cohort Feature Policy directive in Browser Topics API". GitHub. Retrieved May 24, 2022. if EITHER the interest-cohort OR the browsing-topics directive turns off the API, then the API is off
  20. ↑ Karlin, Josh (August 22, 2019). "Update README.md · WICG/floc@a263efa". GitHub . Retrieved January 29, 2022.
  21. 1 2 "Appendix G: the role of tracking in digital advertising" (PDF). Online platforms and digital advertising: Market study final report (Report). Competition and Markets Authority. July 1, 2020. p. 116.
  22. ↑ Bruell, Alexandra (March 16, 2021). "Five Things We Know About Google's Ad Changes After Cookies". Wall Street Journal . ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  23. ↑ Amadeo, Ron (June 24, 2021). "Google delays FLoC rollout until 2023". Ars Technica. Retrieved June 29, 2021.
  24. ↑ Clark, Kendra (May 17, 2021). "DuckDuckGo, Firefox & GitHub say 'no FLoCing way' to Google's privacy updates". The Drum. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  25. 1 2 3 Lomas, Natasha (March 24, 2021). "Google isn't testing FLoCs in Europe yet". TechCrunch . Retrieved May 1, 2021.
  26. ↑ "Remove FLoC code · chromium/chromium@9255aec". GitHub. Retrieved September 18, 2023.
  27. ↑ Nguyen, George (January 25, 2022). "Google kills FLoC, introduces Topics API as its next-gen targeting tech". Search Engine Land.
  28. ↑ Peter, Snyder (January 26, 2022). "Google's Topics API: Rebranding FLoC Without Addressing Key Privacy Issues". Brave Browser. Retrieved March 16, 2022.
  29. ↑ Schiff, Allison (January 26, 2021). "The Industry Reacts To Google's Bold Claim That FLoCs Are 95% As Effective As Cookies". AdExchanger . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  30. ↑ "Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC)". GitHub. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  31. ↑ "EFF technologist cites Google "breach of trust" on FLoC; key ad-tech change agent departs IAB Tech Lab". Information Trust Exchange Governing Association. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  32. ↑ Cyphers, Bennett (March 30, 2021). "Google Is Testing Its Controversial New Ad Targeting Tech in Millions of Browsers. Here's What We Know". Electronic Frontier Foundation . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  33. ↑ Lekach, Sasha (April 11, 2021). "Chrome users, check if Google is tracking you with new targeted advertising". Mashable . Retrieved April 11, 2021.
  34. ↑ Davis, Wendy (March 17, 2021). "Google Plan For Cookie-Less Targeting Is Anticompetitive, States Claim". MediaPost. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  35. ↑ Doctorow, Cory (April 21, 2021). "Fighting FLoC and Fighting Monopoly Are Fully Compatible". Electronic Frontier Foundation . Retrieved May 1, 2021.
  36. 1 2 "DuckDuckGo is asking people to block Google's new tracking method". Hindustan Times . April 10, 2021. Retrieved April 11, 2021.
  37. ↑ Saroha, Aditya (April 12, 2021). "Google's new ad tracking tool called into question by rival search engine". The Hindu . ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved April 12, 2021.
  38. ↑ Khan, Sieeka (April 10, 2021). "Google to Launch Replacement for Third-Party Cookies, and DuckDuckGo Wants to Block it". Tech Times. Retrieved April 12, 2021.
  39. ↑ Thurrott, Paul (April 12, 2021). "Brave is Blocking Google FLoC". Thurrott.com. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  40. ↑ Varghese, Sam. "Brave browser chiefs slam Google's new experimental ad-targeting tech". IT Wire. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  41. ↑ Snyder, Peter; Eich, Brendan (April 12, 2021). "Why Brave Disables FLoC". Brave blog. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  42. ↑ "GitHub disables Google FLoC user tracking on its website". BleepingComputer. Retrieved June 2, 2021.
  43. ↑ "Add Permissions-Policy header to block Google FLoC". Drupal.org. April 19, 2021. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
  44. ↑ "Amazon is blocking Google's FLoC — and that could seriously weaken the system". Digiday . June 15, 2021. Retrieved July 17, 2021.
  45. ↑ Schoon, Ben (April 19, 2021). "WordPress could turn FLoC off by default". 9to5Google . Retrieved April 20, 2021.
  46. ↑ Bohn, Dieter (April 16, 2021). "Nobody is flying to join Google's FLoC". The Verge. Retrieved April 17, 2021.
  47. ↑ Rescorla, Eric (June 10, 2021). "Privacy analysis of FLoC". The Mozilla Blog. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
  48. ↑ Robertson, Adi (March 16, 2021). "Google antitrust suit takes aim at Chrome's Privacy Sandbox". The Verge . Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  49. ↑ Holt, K (December 16, 2020). "Texas announces a multi-state antitrust suit against Google". Engadget . Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  50. ↑ Masnick, Mike (March 16, 2021). "Google's Efforts To Be Better About Your Privacy, Now Attacked As An Antitrust Violation". Techdirt . Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  51. ↑ Brodkin, Jon (June 22, 2021). "EU antitrust regulators launch probe into Google's FLoC plan". Ars Technica . Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  52. 1 2 3 Burgess, Matt (April 29, 2021). "Google's plan to eradicate cookies is crumbling". Wired UK . ISSN   1357-0978 . Retrieved May 1, 2021.
  53. ↑ Lepitak, Stephen; Southern, Lucinda; Shields, Ronan (March 24, 2021). "Google's Post-Cookie Targeting Plans Hit GDPR Hurdle". AdWeek . Retrieved May 1, 2021.
  1. ↑ Lekach, Sasha (April 11, 2021). "Chrome users, check if Google is tracking you with new targeted advertising". Mashable . Retrieved April 11, 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.