Google Street View privacy concerns

Last updated

Privacy advocates have objected to the Google Street View feature, pointing to photographs that show people leaving strip clubs, protesters at an abortion clinic, sunbathers in bikinis, cottagers at public parks, people picking up prostitutes, and people engaging in activities visible from public property which they do not wish to be photographed and have published online. [1] Google maintains that the photos were taken from public property. [2] However, this does not take into account that the Street View cameras take pictures from an elevated position, enabling them to look over hedges and walls designed to prevent some areas from being open to public view. Before launching the service, Google removed photos of domestic violence shelters, and additionally allows users to flag inappropriate or sensitive imagery for Google to review and remove. [3] When the service was first launched, the process for requesting that an image be removed was not trivial. [4] Google changed its policy to make removal more straightforward, [5] but has since removed the option to request removal of an image, replacing it by an option to request blurring of an image. Images of potential break-ins, sunbathers, and individuals entering adult bookstores have, however, remained active and these images have been widely republished. [6]

Contents

In Europe, the creation of Google Street View may not be legal in all jurisdictions. Some European countries have laws prohibiting the filming without consent of an individual on public property for the purpose of public display. [7]

Google Street View blurs parts of images containing car number plates and human faces in order to protect privacy and anonymity. [8]

Americas

Argentina

In Argentina, Street View cars started taking pictures four years later than originally planned. Initially, Google planned to start collecting images on the same day as in Brazil but they didn't get government permits. These permits were obtained in September 2013. One day after Google Street View cars started taking pictures, a lawyer from La Plata tried to stop them in his city [9] but on October 4, 2013, a justice dismissed his complaint. [10]

Canada

While Canada, like other jurisdictions, has raised the issue of privacy concerns regarding Google Street View, the presence of Google cameras in one Canadian city in March 2009 gave rise to a different complaint. Les MacPherson, a columnist with the Saskatoon Star-Phoenix, complained in a March 28, 2009, column that the timing of the imaging, at the end of a protracted winter season and before the true onset of spring would cast an unfavourable image of Saskatoon and other cities. "What worries me more than any loss of privacy is the prospect of presenting to the world a highly unflattering impression of Canadian cities. With the possible exception of Victoria, they do not show off well in the spring. Google could not have picked a more inauspicious time to do its scanning. Saskatoon is unfortunately typical. For Google to record its images of the city at this most visually unappealing time of year is like photographing a beautiful woman who has just awakened from a six-month coma," he wrote. [11] In early October 2009, the first Canadian cities began to appear on Street View; several, including Saskatoon, were not included in the initial roll-out. One city that was included, Calgary, included images taken in both summer and winter. Images of Saskatoon were rolled out on December 2, 2009.

United States

Google delayed the release of Street View of the Baltimore-Washington Metropolitan Area following concern expressed by the United States Department of Homeland Security that some of the images taken might be of security-sensitive areas. [12] Additionally, the Department of Defense has banned Google from publishing Street View content of U.S. Military bases and asked Google to remove existing content of bases. Google has complied with this order. [13]

Some cities in the United States where all streets are privately owned have asked Google to remove Street View images because their consent was not given. North Oaks, Minnesota may have been the first. In that case, Google complied. [14]

Aaron and Christine Boring, a Pittsburgh couple, sued Google for invasion of privacy. Street View made a photo of their home available online, and they claimed that this diminished the value of their house, which they had chosen for its privacy. [15] They lost their case in a Pennsylvania court. "While it is easy to imagine that many whose property appears on Google's virtual maps resent the privacy implications, it is hard to believe that any – other than the most exquisitely sensitive – would suffer shame or humiliation," Judge Hay ruled. [16] Since then the decision was reversed in part and on December 1, 2010, Magistrate Judge Bissoon ruled that Google is an intentional trespasser [17] and the company was ordered to pay one US dollar to the plaintiffs.

In September 2007, a Street View vehicle took a picture of a house on fire in Gibson, Arkansas. [18] In August 2008, the people who lived in the house asked Google to remove this picture.[ failed verification ]

In 2010, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) [19] stating that Google's admitted downloading of private Wi-Fi data [20] constituted a violation of The US Wiretap Act and The Federal Communications Act. The FTC decided not to take up the complaint. [21] Documents subsequently obtained by EPIC under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) indicated, despite a request from Congress, [22] that the FTC did not examine Google's data from private wireless networks before dropping the case. [23] EPIC filed an administrative appeal with the FTC, [24] challenging its decision, and in May 2011 EPIC filed a suit against the FTC for access to the documents on which the FTC's decision was based. [25]

Asia

Hong Kong

Before the launch of Google Street View in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data took the initiative to inquire into the Google Street View Project, to ensure that it complies with the provisions of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance in Hong Kong and to consider privacy issues that may arise.

Google declares that the Project does not intend to compile information about specific individuals whose identities can be ascertained. Faces of passers-by and car licence plates in the photographs will be unidentifiable because blurring technology is to be used. Also, there will be at least a three-month gap between image gathering and publication, to prevent the images being used to identify an individual's current whereabouts.

Google also assures the Commissioner that if anyone objects to any image of themselves, their cars, houses or children captured by the cameras, the related image will be removed.

The commissioner concluded that Google Street View does not breach Hong Kong privacy laws. But he will look seriously into any complaint made by an affected individual in accordance with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. [26]

India

Google started taking Street View images in Bangalore, India, on May 26, 2011. A Google executive promised that they would do their best to avoid security concerns. [27] However, on June 20, 2011, Street View was blocked in Bangalore due to security concerns from the police in Bangalore. [28] Google officials and leaders from BJP, the ruling party in Karnataka, organized a meeting on July 19, 2011, to continue Street View in Bangalore. The Google officials, however, failed to convince the leaders that they would not violate any privacy laws. [29]

However, on 27 July 2022 the government of India allowed street view in some cities of India like Chennai, New Delhi, Mumbai, and many others. [30] The country was worried about Google's plans to put Indian cities, tourist spots, hills and rivers in an application in which one can explore through 360-degree, panoramic and street level imagery, because they fear that terrorists could use these maps to plan terrorist attacks in India. Official sources said after a detailed analysis by security agencies and defense forces, feel that allowing Google to cover India would compromise the country's security interests.

Japan

In Japan, Google Street View started in August 2008 and was made available for ten Japanese Prefectures in February 2009. The available Street View areas depicted residential and business areas, and showed the faces of pedestrians, displayed vehicle registration plates, and the name plate of a family residence ( 表札 , Hyōsatsu) – Google's decision to show these has led to disputes. Local governments, lawyers and individuals claimed Google was violating privacy. [31] On February 3, 2009, Google Japan representatives attended a meeting about privacy concerns held at a Tokyo Metropolitan Government facility, and agreed that privacy issues had not been adequately considered. Google pledged that, before taking photographs for Street View, they would in future notify the provinces' local government. Google Japan admitted that notifications and explanations of this kind had already been taking place in countries other than Japan, but had not done so in Japan as they were not aware of the potential privacy concerns. [32]

On May 13, 2009, Google Japan announced that it would modify its cameras to scan from a lower height of 2.05 meters above ground level, 95 centimeters lower than the original height of the camera head. The new height is intended to avoid having cameras view over fences in front of homes and into homes. This reduced height is to be applied immediately, and all areas previously visited will be rescanned from the reduced height. Scans taken at the original height will remain available until they are replaced with the new images.

On November 11, 2011, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications issued an administrative guidance to Google Inc. that its collecting activity of Wi-Fi data was against the law of telecommunication which requests secrecy of communication, and requested to delete the recorded data, to take measures of preventing of recording the communication data, and to let it be known publicly in Japanese. [33] [34]

Australia

Australia has no laws prohibiting Google Street View. But in October 2010, despite this, Google Street View ceased operations in Australia, following months of investigations from Australian authorities. [35] However, on May 4, 2011, Google announced that they planned to begin production again [36] and on July 27, 2011, the Street View imagery for Australian towns and cities was updated. [37]

Europe

Austria

In Austria, Street View was banned shortly after the launch after Wi-Fi data was collected unauthorized. The ban has since been lifted but strict regulations were put in place that caused Street View to not be deployed despite available data. [38] In July 2018, imagery in various cities in Austria was released. [39] [40] On June 19, 2020, imagery across most of the rest of Austria was released.[ citation needed ]

Czech Republic

In the Czech Republic, Street View was banned in September 2010 by the Czech Office for Personal Data Protection after more than half a year of unsuccessful negotiation between the Czech Republic and Google. The office described Google's program as taking pictures "beyond the extent of the ordinary sight from a street", and that it "disproportionately invade citizens' privacy." However, pictures taken before this decision (mostly in 2009) may have remained available online; Google obliged to erase every picture from that period should they be disputed. [41] [42] In May 2011, the ban was lifted after Google lowered the cameras by 30 centimeters. [43]

Denmark

According to a Danish media lawyer, Oluf Jørgensen, Google's practice of photographing people on private property is illegal. The Danish data authorities advised people who are photographed by Google to report it to police. [44]

In 2010, Denmark, along with Ireland and Austria, requested that Google delete the WiFi data the company had collected unauthorized. [45] Google complied with all three requests. [45]

European Union

The Data Protection Directive says that identifiable people have a right to data protection.

A 2010 demand from the European Union would require Google to warn local residents before sending out the cameras. It also required Google to keep the unblurred versions of the photos no longer than 6 months, instead of a year. In turn, Google announced that it was considering canceling Google Street View service in the European Union due to unmanageable requests of the European Commission. [46]

This requirement was abolished on January 1, 2012. Google was instructed to give advance notice online and in the local press before photographing. [47]

Germany

In an April 2009 interview for the German magazine Focus , Google's Global Privacy Counsel Peter Fleischer remarked that "public opposition to Google Street View in Germany, though not hysterical, had been tougher than in any other country." [48] On the same occasion he stated that the project has now been "essentially aligned with the concerns of data privacy advocates," and that "specific privacy tools would be developed for the German launch while imaging continues at the fastest possible pace." The option to have specific images removed would also apply for locations in Germany.

German Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor Guido Westerwelle said "I will do all I can to prevent it." [49] However, Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière said that people should not get "hysterical" about the issue and called for "caution in introducing blanket rules allowing objections." [50]

As of October 2010, 244,237 German households have opted out from Street View. [51] Google complied by blurring the facades on the corresponding Street View images. This procedure is misleadingly called 'pixelating' in Germany (German: 'Verpixeln'). [52] These photos were removed in July 2023 awaiting the publication of the 2022 images.

In April 2013 Google was fined €145,000 for illegally recording information from unsecured wireless networks. [53] On July 25, 2023, new Street View images were released (taken in 2022), including the 20 largest cities and many new areas were added. [54] Despite that many areas are not covered in the first 2023 rollout, additions of many more areas as well updated 2023 imagery is scheduled to be published in the future.

Greece

Google had been stopped from gathering images in Greek cities for its Street View service until it provided further guarantees about privacy. [55]

However, on January 18, 2010, the government legalized the service under the condition that adequate privacy protection would be realized. [56] The service is enabled since June 2014.

Lithuania

In May 2012 the Lithuanian State Data Protection Inspectorate (SDPI) refused permission for the Google Street View project to operate in Lithuania. The Transport Minister asked the Inspectorate to review its decision. [57] The decision was changed and Google later was able to take photos of streets in Lithuania. [58]

Poland

In May 2009 the Polish GIODO (Polish : Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Danych Osobowych– Chief Inspectorate for the Protection of Personal Data) expressed doubts about Google Street View and its privacy, mostly concerned about the same issues as in other EU countries. However, from 2010 onwards, Google cars appeared on the Polish streets with the consent of state authorities and in consultation with the Ministry of Sport and Tourism.

In 2011 GIODO began monitoring service Street View and published the report which included non-binding demand that Google should clearly communicate and warn when it's going to take pictures in a certain area at a certain time. It was also proposed that car drivers should be added to the records of persons who process personal data in accordance with the Polish law. [59]

Switzerland

In November 2009, Switzerland's Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner Hanspeter Thür announced that his agency would be suing Google because in Street View "numerous faces and vehicle number plates are not made sufficiently unrecognizable from the point of view of data protection". [60]

United Kingdom

In the first days of launch the UK service drew criticism due to privacy. [61] Images were found of a man leaving a sex shop, a man vomiting and another man being arrested. Some images were removed including those of areas around Downing Street. [62] [63]

The service drew criticism in Belfast that it represented a "reckless" security risk, particularly for showing the exteriors of army bases and police stations so soon after the killing of two soldiers in the 2009 Massereene Barracks shooting, and a police officer. [64]

Soon after the launch human rights watchdog Privacy International sent a formal complaint about the service to the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), which cited more than 200 reports from members of the public who were identifiable on Street View images. Privacy International director Simon Davies said that the organization had filed the complaint due to the "clear embarrassment and damage" Street View had caused to many Britons. He said that Street View fell short of the assurances given by Google to the ICO in July 2008 that had enabled its launch, namely that privacy would be protected by blurring faces and vehicle licence plates, and asked for the system to be "switched off" while an investigation was completed. He said the few cases where Google's face blurring system had failed meant the data used by Street View would fall under UK Data Protection legislation, which requires that subjects give permission for the use of information concerning them. [65]

Davies subsequently sent an open letter to then-Google chief executive Eric Schmidt, accusing the company of briefing journalists against him, claiming Davies was biased in favour of Microsoft. Google has pointed to connections between Microsoft and data protection consultancy 80/20 Thinking , run by Davies, and has said that Davies' connections to Microsoft should be made clear in public, as the credibility of his criticisms is undermined by the fact that he acts as a consultant to companies who are direct rivals and critics of Google, a fact Davies rarely discloses in press releases or comments. [66]

On April 23, 2009, the Information Commissioner ruled that although Google Street View carries a small risk of privacy invasion it should not be stopped. They ruled that "There is no law against anyone taking pictures of people in the street as long as the person using the camera is not harassing people". They also ruled that Google Street View does not contravene the Data Protection Act, as an image of a house held on Street View is not a data protection matter, as data protection is about people's personal information. [67] [68]

In March 2010, Google was forced to remove images of military, security and intelligence installations admitting that it had ignored signs warning that photographing the sites breached the Official Secrets Act with fears that the published photographs could be useful to terrorists. [69]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Closed-circuit television</span> Use of video cameras to transmit a signal to a specific place on a limited set of monitors

Closed-circuit television (CCTV), also known as video surveillance, is the use of closed-circuit television cameras to transmit a signal to a specific place, on a limited set of monitors. It differs from broadcast television because signal is not openly transmitted, though it may employ point-to-point, point-to-multipoint (P2MP), or mesh wired or wireless links. Even though almost all video cameras fit this definition, the term is most often applied to those used for surveillance in areas that require additional security or ongoing monitoring.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) is an independent nonprofit research center established in 1994 to protect privacy, freedom of expression, and democratic values in the information age. Based in Washington, D.C., their mission is to "secure the fundamental right to privacy in the digital age for all people through advocacy, research, and litigation." EPIC believes that privacy is a fundamental right, the internet belongs to people who use it, and there's a responsible way to use technology.

Information privacy is the relationship between the collection and dissemination of data, technology, the public expectation of privacy, contextual information norms, and the legal and political issues surrounding them. It is also known as data privacy or data protection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass surveillance</span> Intricate surveillance of an entire or a substantial fraction of a population

Mass surveillance is the intricate surveillance of an entire or a substantial fraction of a population in order to monitor that group of citizens. The surveillance is often carried out by local and federal governments or governmental organizations, but it may also be carried out by corporations. Depending on each nation's laws and judicial systems, the legality of and the permission required to engage in mass surveillance varies. It is the single most indicative distinguishing trait of totalitarian regimes. It is often distinguished from targeted surveillance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Privacy International</span>

Privacy International (PI) is a UK-based registered charity that defends and promotes the right to privacy across the world. First formed in 1990, registered as a non-profit company in 2002 and as a charity in 2012, PI is based in London. Its current executive director, since 2012, is Dr Gus Hosein.

Internet privacy involves the right or mandate of personal privacy concerning the storage, re-purposing, provision to third parties, and display of information pertaining to oneself via the Internet. Internet privacy is a subset of data privacy. Privacy concerns have been articulated from the beginnings of large-scale computer sharing and especially relate to mass surveillance.

A privacy policy is a statement or legal document that discloses some or all of the ways a party gathers, uses, discloses, and manages a customer or client's data. Personal information can be anything that can be used to identify an individual, not limited to the person's name, address, date of birth, marital status, contact information, ID issue, and expiry date, financial records, credit information, medical history, where one travels, and intentions to acquire goods and services. In the case of a business, it is often a statement that declares a party's policy on how it collects, stores, and releases personal information it collects. It informs the client what specific information is collected, and whether it is kept confidential, shared with partners, or sold to other firms or enterprises. Privacy policies typically represent a broader, more generalized treatment, as opposed to data use statements, which tend to be more detailed and specific.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christopher Soghoian</span> American computer scientist (born 1981)

Christopher Soghoian is a privacy researcher and activist. He is currently working for Senator Ron Wyden as the senator’s Senior Advisor for Privacy & Cybersecurity. From 2012 to 2016, he was the principal technologist at the American Civil Liberties Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google Street View</span> Photos at street level

Google Street View is a technology featured in Google Maps and Google Earth that provides interactive panoramas from positions along many streets in the world. It was launched in 2007 in several cities in the United States, and has since expanded to include all of the country's major and minor cities, as well as the cities and rural areas of many other countries worldwide. Streets with Street View imagery available are shown as clickable blue lines on Google Maps.

Google Buzz was a social networking, microblogging and messaging tool developed by Google. It replaced Google Wave and was integrated into their web-based email program, Gmail. Users could share links, photos, videos, status messages and comments organized in "conversations" and visible in the user's inbox.

In Europe, Google Street View began on 2 July 2008 with the route of Tour de France being covered in parts of France and Italy. The service has since expanded to many European countries, while at the same time has been controversial in some countries due to laws and privacy concerns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google Street View in Canada</span>

In Canada, Google Street View is available on streets, roads, and highways in most parts of the country, with coverage in all provinces and territories. The feature is also provided in Whistler Blackcomb Resort, the location of the 2010 Winter Olympics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google Street View in Asia</span>

In Asia, Google Street View is available in Bangladesh, Bhutan, British Indian Ocean Territory, Cambodia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Macau, Malaysia, Mongolia, the Philippines, Qatar, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates. This includes disputed territories in both Israel and India. It is also available for a few select tourist attractions in the People's Republic of China, Iraq, Nepal and Pakistan.

In Oceania, Google Street View is available in most parts of Australia and New Zealand.

Do Not Track (DNT) is a formerly official HTTP header field, designed to allow internet users to opt out of tracking by websites—which includes the collection of data regarding a user's activity across multiple distinct contexts, and the retention, use, or sharing of data derived from that activity outside the context in which it occurred.

The Spanish Data Protection Agency is an independent agency of the government of Spain which oversees the compliance with the legal provisions on the protection of personal data. The agency is headquartered in the city of Madrid and it extends its authority to the whole country.

<i>United States v. Google Inc.</i>

United States v. Google Inc., No. 3:12-cv-04177, is a case in which the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a stipulated order for a permanent injunction and a $22.5 million civil penalty judgment, the largest civil penalty the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has ever won in history. The FTC and Google Inc. consented to the entry of the stipulated order to resolve the dispute which arose from Google's violation of its privacy policy. In this case, the FTC found Google liable for misrepresenting "privacy assurances to users of Apple's Safari Internet browser". It was reached after the FTC considered that through the placement of advertising tracking cookies in the Safari web browser, and while serving targeted advertisements, Google violated the 2011 FTC's administrative order issued in FTC v. Google Inc.

The right to be forgotten (RTBF) is the right to have private information about a person be removed from Internet searches and other directories in some circumstances. The issue has arisen from desires of individuals to "determine the development of their life in an autonomous way, without being perpetually or periodically stigmatized as a consequence of a specific action performed in the past". The right entitles a person to have data about them deleted so that it can no longer be discovered by third parties, particularly through search engines.

Google has been involved in multiple lawsuits over issues such as privacy, advertising, intellectual property and various Google services such as Google Books and YouTube. The company's legal department expanded from one to nearly 100 lawyers in the first five years of business, and by 2014 had grown to around 400 lawyers. Google's Chief Legal Officer is Senior Vice President of Corporate Development David Drummond.

Google's changes to its privacy policy on March 16, 2012, enabled the company to share data across a wide variety of services. These embedded services include millions of third-party websites that use AdSense and Analytics. The policy was widely criticized for creating an environment that discourages Internet innovation by making Internet users more fearful and wary of what they do online.

References

  1. ↑ MacDonald, Calum (June 4, 2007). "Google's Street View site raises alarm over privacy". The Herald. Archived from the original on February 13, 2010. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  2. ↑ Frome, Andrea, German Cheung, Ahmad Abdulkader, Marco Zennaro, Bo Wu, Alessandro Bissacco, Hartwig Adam, Hartmut Neven, and Luc Vincent. "Large-scale privacy protection in google street view". 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ↑ Mills, Elinor (June 3, 2007). "Google's street-level maps raising privacy concerns". USA Today. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  4. ↑ "Google Waffles on Street View Takedown Policy". Dr. Dobb's Portal. June 15, 2007.
  5. ↑ "Google Lets You Remove People from Street View". Google Operating System. August 26, 2007. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  6. ↑ "Google Street View: Accidental Online Community or Real Invasion of Privacy?". Web Urbanist. June 8, 2007.
  7. ↑ "Google's Street View could be unlawful in Europe". Out-Law.Com. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  8. ↑ "Privacy and Security" . Retrieved October 6, 2014.
  9. ↑ "Comienzan los problemas legales para Street View en la Argentina".
  10. ↑ "Luz verde para que los autos de Google recorran La Plata". Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved October 6, 2014.
  11. ↑ MacPherson, Les (March 28, 2009), "City not at its best in Google's new photos", Saskatoon Star-Phoenix , retrieved April 19, 2009[ dead link ]
  12. ↑ "Pull up a chair for a walking tour | The Providence Journal". Projo.com. March 1, 2008. Archived from the original on March 22, 2010. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  13. ↑ "Pentagon bans Google teams from bases". Reuters. March 6, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2008.
  14. ↑ Pabst, Lora (May 31, 2008). "North Oaks tells Google Maps: Keep out – we mean it". Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  15. ↑ "Couple Sues Google Over "Street View"". The Smoking Gun . Retrieved April 4, 2008.
  16. ↑ Kiss, Jemima (February 19, 2009). "Google wins Street View privacy case". The Guardian. London. Retrieved February 19, 2009. An American couple who attempted to sue Google over what they claimed was its "privacy invading" Street View technology have lost their case in a Pennsylvania court.
  17. ↑ "Consent Judgment" (PDF). December 1, 2010. Retrieved January 1, 2011.
  18. ↑ "Google Street View Catches House on Fire". Neatorama.com. August 10, 2008. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  19. ↑ "EPIC FCC Letter" (PDF). Electronic Privacy Information Center. May 18, 2010.
  20. ↑ "WiFi data collection: An update". googleblog.blogspot.com.
  21. ↑ "Federal Trade Commission email to Google" (PDF). October 27, 2010.
  22. ↑ "Congress/EPIC FTC Letter" (PDF). Electronic Privacy Information Center. May 19, 2010.
  23. ↑ "Email conversation regarding Google's use of Wi-fi" (PDF). Electronic Privacy Information Center. October 29, 2010.
  24. ↑ "EPIC FTC Letter" (PDF). Electronic Privacy Information Center. February 11, 2011.
  25. ↑ "EPIC FTC Final Complaint" (PDF). Electronic Privacy Information Center. May 12, 2011.
  26. ↑ "Privacy Commissioner inquired into Google Street View Project". HKPCPD. Archived from the original on July 22, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2009.
  27. ↑ John Ribeiro (May 26, 2011). "Google Street View in India Faces Challenges". PC World . Archived from the original on July 30, 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2011.
  28. ↑ "Google Street View blocked in Bangalore". IT World . June 20, 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2011.
  29. ↑ Kul Bhushan (July 19, 2011). "Google officials meet Karnataka BJP leaders to resume Street View project". Thinkdigit . Retrieved August 4, 2011.
  30. ↑ "Google yet to receive permission to launch street view in India". The Economic Times . November 4, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
  31. ↑ "Japan: Debate over Google Street View continues". Global Voices. August 14, 2008. Retrieved February 8, 2009.
  32. ↑ Yomiuri Shimbun (Japanese edition), February 4, 2009 Ver.13S page 28
  33. ↑ グーグル株式会社に対する「通信の秘密」の保護に係る措置（指導） (Press release) (in Japanese). Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
  34. ↑ "Japan Orders Google to Stop Illicit Data Gathering". Jiji Press. November 11, 2011.
  35. ↑ "Google street view cars no longer operational in Australia – Computer world.com – November 9, 2010". Computer world.com. October 29, 2010. Archived from the original on September 17, 2011. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  36. ↑ Eustace, Alan. "Privacy Impact Assessment for Street View in Australia". Google Inc. Retrieved August 12, 2011.
  37. ↑ Foster, Andrew. "Updates to Street View in Australia". Google Inc. Retrieved August 12, 2011.
  38. ↑ "Recent Developments regarding Google Street View". Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde. Archived from the original on August 7, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2016.
  39. ↑ michael.leitner (July 12, 2018). "Google Street View ab sofort in Österreich verfügbar". futurezone (in German). Retrieved February 18, 2022.
  40. ↑ "Google Street View finally captures missing Austria". The Local Austria. July 20, 2017. Retrieved December 12, 2021.
  41. ↑ "Czech Republic stops Google from further Street View photography | Sci-Tech | DW.DE | 15.09.2010". Dw-world.de. Retrieved April 7, 2012.
  42. ↑ "Czech Republic blocks Google's data mapping feature". Seer Press. September 25, 2010. Archived from the original on March 13, 2012. Retrieved April 7, 2012.
  43. ↑ "Google dostal úřední zelenou k 3D mapování ulic v Česku". Regiony24 (in Czech). May 25, 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2011.
  44. ↑ af trfi for TV 2 Nyhederne. "Google Street View is a systematic violation of law". Nyhederne-dyn.tv2.dk. Archived from the original on May 12, 2013. Retrieved August 27, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  45. 1 2 "Investigations of Google Street View". Electronic Privacy Information Center. Retrieved October 20, 2020.
  46. ↑ "Google May Drop Street View in EU if Photo Storage Time Is Cut". BusinessWeek. March 3, 2010. Archived from the original on November 21, 2010. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  47. ↑ The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/25/AR2010022504840.html.{{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)[ dead link ]
  48. ↑ Focus No. 18/2009, p. 20 (April 28, 2009)
  49. ↑ "German Foreign Minister joins criticism of Google's mapping program". Dw-world.de. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  50. ↑ "German government considers Google 'Street View' concerns". The Mercury News. Associated Press. August 18, 2010. Retrieved May 26, 2020.
  51. ↑ David Gordon Smith – with wire reports (October 21, 2010). "Germans Unfazed by Google Street View". Der Spiegel. Retrieved February 15, 2011.
  52. ↑ mbw – with wire reports (September 20, 2010). "More than 100,000 Germans Ask Google to Blur their Homes". Der Spiegel. Retrieved February 15, 2011.
  53. ↑ "Google fined 'inadequate' €145,000". 3 News NZ. April 23, 2013. Archived from the original on July 14, 2014. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
  54. ↑ "Entdeckt Deutschland mit Google Street View!". Google (in German). July 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  55. ↑ "Google Street View blacked out in Greece". CNN. May 13, 2009. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  56. ↑ "Πράσινο φως στο Google Street View". Enet.gr. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  57. ↑ "Transport Minister calls to review ban on Google Street View in Lithuania". 15min.lt. Retrieved June 10, 2012.
  58. ↑ "Google launches Street View project in Lithuania". 15min.lt. Retrieved February 4, 2013.
  59. ↑ "Google Street View a prawo – wizerunek i dobra osobiste". Prawo Nowych Technologii. November 29, 2013. Retrieved January 4, 2014.
  60. ↑ Swiss Contend Google Doesn't Blur Street View Enough Archived February 19, 2010, at the Wayback Machine PC World by Jeremy Kirk
  61. ↑ dave (March 20, 2009). "Images Get Pulled From Google Street View In First Week Of Service". News.idealo.co.uk. Archived from the original on August 23, 2011. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  62. ↑ "Google's pictures of UK go live". BBC News. March 19, 2009. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  63. ↑ "Google pulls some street images". BBC News. March 20, 2009. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  64. ↑ "Google 'reckless' on NI security". BBC News. March 20, 2009. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  65. ↑ "Call to 'shut down' Street View". BBC News. March 24, 2009.
  66. ↑ "Google 'trying to smear Street View critic'", Belfast Telegraph , March 28, 2009, retrieved April 1, 2009
  67. ↑ "Common sense on Street View must prevail, says the ICO" (PDF), Information Commissioner , April 23, 2009, archived from the original (PDF) on March 24, 2015, retrieved April 1, 2009
  68. ↑ "All clear for Google Street View". BBC News. April 23, 2009.
  69. ↑ Hough, Andrew (March 21, 2010). "Google Street View 'forced to remove images of secret British security bases'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved June 24, 2017.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.