A request that this article title be changed to Regnal years of English monarchs is under discussion . Please do not move this article until the discussion is closed. |
The regnal years of English and British monarchs are the official regnal years of the monarchs of the Kingdom of England from 1066 to May 1707, the Kingdom of Great Britain from May 1707 to January 1801, and the United Kingdom since January 1801. The regnal calendar ("nth year of the reign of King X", abbreviated to "n X", etc.) continues to be utilised in many official British government and legal documents of historical interest, notably parliamentary statutes prior to 1963, and prior to 1867 in the case law collected in the year books, nominative reporters, and digests, and in the reports republished in the English Reports and Revised Reports.
For centuries, English official public documents have been dated according to the regnal years of the ruling monarch. Traditionally, parliamentary statutes are referenced by regnal year, e.g. the Occasional Conformity Act 1711 is officially referenced as "10 Ann. c. 6" (read as "the sixth chapter of the statute of the parliamentary session that sat in the 10th year of the reign of Queen Anne").
Regnal years are calculated from the official date (year, month and day) of a monarch's accession. For example, King George III acceded on 25 October 1760. That marks the beginning of his first regnal year. His second regnal year starts on 25 October 1761, his third regnal year on 25 October 1762, and so on. When a monarch dies, abdicates or is deposed, the regnal year comes to an end (whether the full year has run its course or not). A new regnal year begins from a new date, with a new monarch.
As different monarchs begin their reigns at different times, the exact month and day when a regnal year begins varies across reigns. For example, Elizabeth I's regnal year starts on 17 November, James I's on 24 March, Charles I's on 27 March, and so on.
The table below gives the dates of the regnal years for Kings of England (and subsequently Great Britain), from 1066 to the present day. [1] These are official de jure dates, and may or may not coincide with whether a particular king had de facto power or not at that time. For example, as the Commonwealth era was suppressed in the official record, the regnal years of Charles II are measured from 30 January 1649 (the day his father Charles I was executed); as a result, when Charles II actually became king, on 29 May 1660, he was already in his 12th regnal year. (For the de facto tabulation of English rulers, see any conventional list of English monarchs.)
Regnal years on the table below are recorded only for Kings of England (and subsequently Great Britain, and later the United Kingdom). These are not regnal years of Kings of Scotland nor Ireland, which have their own regnal dates.
The regnal year is distinct from the official "legal year" – that is, the calendar used for legal, civic and ecclesiastical purposes. The legal year also did not always coincide with the start date for the historical year. Until the 13th century, the English legal year began at Christmas (25 December). From the 13th century until 1752, the legal year began on 25 March (Lady Day). [2] It is only since 1752 that the legal year was re-set to coincide with the start of the historical calendar year (1 January) (see Calendar (New Style) Act 1750). [3]
These date differences can also be confusing when sorting dates in old documents before 1753. For example, the reign of Charles I came to an end with his execution on 30 January 1649, but contemporary records such as the House of Commons Journals record this as 30 January 1648. [4] To account for this complication, it is customary for historians referring to official or legal events between 1 January and 25 March to write the year down in "double-barreled" format (e.g. "30 January 1648–49", the former being the legal year, the latter the historical year). [5]
The regnal years listed below are given in normal historical date (not legal year). So a parliamentary statute that was passed on, say, 10 February 1585 (in normal calendar date) would be dated in the official record as 10 February 1584 (the legal year), and simultaneously said to have been passed in the 27th year of Elizabeth I (the regnal year that started on 17 November 1584). [3]
The 1750 Act reforming the legal year also officially introduced to England the Gregorian calendar on Thursday 14 September 1752. Up until then, England had been using the Julian calendar, which by that time was eleven days behind the calendar of most countries on the European Continent. So events before 1752 in English records often differ from European records, and it is sometimes necessary to refer to both sets of dates using "Old Style" (Julian) and "New Style" (Gregorian) notation, e.g. William of Orange's armada landed in England on 5 November 1688 (OS) or 15 November 1688 (NS) (see Old Style and New Style dates). The dates in the table below follow the English calendar (OS until 1752, NS thereafter).
To calculate the regnal year from a particular date, one subtracts the first regnal year from the calendar year in question. The year is not adjusted if the month and day falls before the regnal date, and if it falls on or after the regnal date, add one. Finally – for the regnal year of William III after Mary's death (that is, from 28 December 1694 onwards) – one also adds 6.
| Monarch | No. of years | First regnal year | Regnal year start date | Regnal year end date | End of final year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William I | 21 | 1066 | 14 October | 13 October | 9 September 1087 |
| William II | 13 | 1087 | 26 September | 25 September | 2 August 1100 |
| Henry I | 36 | 1100 | 5 August | 4 August | 1 December 1135 |
| Stephen | 19 | 1135 | 26 December [a] | 25 December | 25 October 1154 |
| Henry II | 35 | 1154 | 19 December | 18 December | 6 July 1189 |
| Richard I | 10 | 1189 | 3 September [b] | 2 September | 6 April 1199 |
| John | 18 | 1199 | Ascension Day (varied, May/June) [c] | varied, May/June [c] | 19 October 1216 |
| Henry III | 57 | 1216 | 28 October | 27 October | 16 November 1272 |
| Edward I | 35 | 1272 | 20 November | 20 November [d] | 7 July 1307 |
| Edward II | 20 | 1307 | 8 July | 7 July | 20 January 1327 |
| Edward III | 51 (England), 38 (France) [e] | 1327 | 25 January | 24 January | 21 June 1377 |
| Richard II | 23 | 1377 | 22 June [f] | 21 June | 29 September 1399 |
| Henry IV | 14 | 1399 | 30 September | 29 September | 20 March 1413 |
| Henry V | 10 | 1413 | 21 March | 20 March | 31 August 1422 |
| Henry VI | 39 + 1 [g] | 1422 | 1 September | 31 August | 4 March 1461 |
| Edward IV | 23 | 1461 | 4 March | 3 March | 9 April 1483 |
| Edward V | 1 | 1483 | 9 April | 25 June | 25 June 1483 |
| Richard III | 3 | 1483 | 26 June | 25 June | 22 August 1485 |
| Henry VII | 24 | 1485 | 22 August | 21 August | 21 April 1509 |
| Henry VIII | 38 | 1509 | 22 April | 21 April | 28 January 1547 |
| Edward VI | 7 | 1547 | 28 January | 27 January | 6 July 1553 |
| Mary I | 2 | 1553 | 6 July [h] | 5 July | 24 July 1554 [i] |
| "Philip and Mary" | 5 & 6 [i] | 1554 | 25 July | 24 July | 17 November 1558 |
| Elizabeth I | 45 | 1558 | 17 November | 16 November | 24 March 1603 |
| James I | 23 | 1603 | 24 March | 23 March | 27 March 1625 [6] |
| Charles I | 24 | 1625 | 27 March | 26 March | 30 January 1649 |
| Charles II | 37 [j] | 1649 | 30 January | 29 January | 6 February 1685 |
| James II | 4 | 1685 | 6 February | 5 February | 11 December 1688 [k] |
| "William and Mary" | 6 | 1689 | 13 February [l] | 12 February | 27 December 1694 |
| William III | 8 (7 to 14) [m] | 1694 | 28 December [m] | 27 December | 8 March 1702 |
| Anne | 13 | 1702 | 8 March | 7 March | 1 August 1714 |
| George I | 13 | 1714 | 1 August | 31 July | 11 June 1727 |
| George II | 34 | 1727 | 11 June | 10 June | 25 October 1760 |
| George III | 60 [n] | 1760 | 25 October | 24 October | 29 January 1820 |
| George IV | 11 [o] | 1820 | 29 January | 28 January | 26 June 1830 |
| William IV | 7 | 1830 | 26 June | 25 June | 20 June 1837 |
| Victoria | 64 | 1837 | 20 June | 19 June | 22 January 1901 |
| Edward VII | 10 | 1901 | 22 January | 21 January | 6 May 1910 |
| George V | 26 | 1910 | 6 May | 5 May | 20 January 1936 |
| Edward VIII | 1 | 1936 | 20 January | 11 December | 11 December 1936 |
| George VI | 16 | 1936 | 11 December | 10 December | 5 February 1952 [7] |
| Elizabeth II | 71 | 1952 | 6 February | 5 February | 8 September 2022 |
| Charles III | 4 (ongoing) | 2022 | 8 September | 7 September |
On many legal documents, including statute rolls and in statute compilations up until the mid-19th century, the full name of the regnal year is usually written out in Latin, e.g. "Anno Regni Georgii II vicesimo nono" for "29 George II" (i.e. 1756).
Legal citation usually uses abbreviations of royal names for simplicity. In legal citation, the first monarch of a regnal name is not followed by an ordinal number, but all subsequent monarchs of that name are. Thus, the 25th year of Elizabeth I is simply 25 Eliz., but the 25th year of Elizabeth II is 25 Eliz. 2.
| Regnal name | Modern legal abbr. | 17th cent. abbr. | Latin name |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anne | Ann. | Annae | |
| Charles | Car. [8] | Car. [4] | Caroli |
| Edward | Edw. | E., Ed. | Edwardi |
| Elizabeth | Eliz. | El., Eliz. | Elizabethae |
| George | Geo. | G. | Georgii |
| Henry | Hen. | H. | Henrici |
| James | Jac. | Jac. | Jacobi |
| John | Joh. | ||
| Mary | Mar. | M. | Mariae |
| Philip and Mary | Phil. & M. | P. & M. | Philippi & Mariae |
| Richard | Rich. | R. | Richardi |
| Victoria | Vict. | Victoriae | |
| William | Will. | W. | Gulielmi |
| William and Mary | W. & M. | Gulielmi & Mariae |
Numbering (in Latin) for regnal year (anno):
| Year | Anno (Latin) |
|---|---|
| 1st | Primo |
| 2nd | Secondo |
| 3rd | Tertio |
| 4th | Quarto |
| 5th | Quinto |
| 6th | Sexto |
| 7th | Septimo |
| 8th | Octavo |
| 9th | Nono |
| 10th | Decimo |
| 11th | Undecimo |
| 12th | Duodecimo |
| 13th | Decimo tertio |
| 14th-19th | Decimo nth, etc. |
| 20th | Vicesimo |
| 21st, etc. | Vicesimo primo, etc. |
| 30th | Tricesimo |
| 31st etc. | Tricesimo primo, etc. |
| 40th | Quadragesimo |
| 41st etc. | Quadragesimo primo, etc. |
| 50th | Quinquagesimo |
| 51st etc. | Quinquagesimo primo, etc. |
| 60th | Sexagesimo |
Between 13th and 15th Centuries, it was common for English official and legal documents (acts, writs, deeds, etc.) to be dated by reference to the weekday relative to a nearby religious feast date and the regnal year (e.g. "Monday after feast of St. Luke Evangelist, 3 Henry V" for 21 October 1415).
Translating a feast citation to a historical calendar date involves looking up the liturgical calendar for the regnal year in question. The standard reference for date conversion is C.R. Cheyney's Handbook of Dates. [9]
England had four "quarter days" on which certain transactions, notably the payment of rents, were conducted every year:
It is not uncommon to find English documents or court judgments relating that a certain action goes into effect or has to be undertaken by one of these quarter days.
Many old legal documents (especially court documents) do not contain any specific day, but simply record the "law term" and regnal year (e.g. "Michaelmas term, 5 George II", meaning sometime in Oct-Nov, 1732).
Since time immemorial, there was a division between "holy days" (dies feriales), dedicated to God alone, where no official or juridical business could be conducted, and "law days" (dies juridicos) when cases could be judged, writs issued, lawsuits filed, etc.
Traditionally (allegedly since the days of Edward the Confessor), the English law days were grouped and divided into four "law terms", that is periods when the higher English law courts would be open (all other days were deemed "holy days" or reserved for agriculture). Each law term lasted about three weeks, and was named after the major religious feast which immediately preceded it. So the four law terms of England were referred to as "Michaelmas term" (the first, Oct-Nov), "Hilary term" (Jan-Feb), "Easter term" (Apr-May) and "Trinity term" (Jun-Jul).
The law terms were primarily established for the Court of Common Pleas, which was separated from the king's court in 1190s and sat in Westminster since 1234. The terms were also adopted by the King's Bench once it also became sedentary. It was more loosely followed by the Exchequer of Pleas. The Court of Chancery, by contrast, was "always open". In practice, the law terms were a little flexible and had varied lengths, depending on the court or volume of business, and sometimes stretched well past the prescribed dates, with breaks if a major religious festival landed within the law term. The Law Terms Act 1830 (11 Geo IV & 1 Will IV c.70) fixed exact calendar dates for the law terms (with only slight adjustments if they landed on a Sunday).
The law terms were abolished in the 1873 Judicature act (36 & 37 Vict c.66), but the old terms continued to be used as a measure of time for legal awards. By force of tradition, the same term labels are still applied today for sittings of the High Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal, but no longer have the same meaning. [10]
As historically the annual accounts of the Exchequer started precisely at Michaelmas (29 September), the Michaelmas law term in is usually considered the first law term of the year.
These law terms apply only to England (Scotland has different law terms entirely).
Some old English universities (e.g. Oxford) use the same labels for their academic terms, but their dates should not be confused with law term dates.
Regnal years were also used for the records at the Exchequer since the earliest days (before 1130). However, the royal fiscal accounts were calculated for one year, always starting on the Morrow of Michaelmas Day (day after feast of St. Michael) (30 September) and ending on Michaelmas Day (29 September). The Pipe Rolls and memoranda of the Exchequer were assigned the label of the regnal year on which the final day fell. [15] This meant that the royal names and numbers assigned to exchequer years dated at the end of the pipe roll, often contradict the regnal years used by the Chancery, e.g. Edward I's 35th regnal year ended with his death on 2 July 1307, but the exchequer year which began on 30 Sep 1306 continues until 29 Sep 1307, which lands in the first regnal year of his successor Edward II. Thus the entire exchequer year (1306–07) is labelled "1 Edward II". Receipts from, say, December 1307, are added to "2 Edward II" in exchequer year, but are "1 Edward II" in regnal year.
This section needs additional citations for verification .(September 2024) |
The Parliament of England has recorded statutes from 1235 to 1707, many of which are still in force in English law jurisdiction (England and Wales). A parliamentary statute is permanent and remains in force until explicitly repealed (although many statutes were passed with in-built expiration dates).
Th Parliament of England was converted into the Parliament of Great Britain in 1707 (with the union of Scotland) and the Parliament of the United Kingdom in 1801 (with the union with Ireland). While politically unified, they were not legally unified. Continued legal separation for Scotland was guaranteed in Article 19 of the 1707 Treaty of Union, and a similar guarantee was made for Ireland in the Act of Union 1800. [16] As a result, the United Kingdom retains three distinct and separate legal systems (English law, Scots law and Northern Ireland law) and three separate legal jurisdictions (England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland). Laws passed by the UK parliament in Westminster have to note which of the three legal jurisdictions (or all) they apply to. The regnal year method of legal citation covered in this article pertains strictly to English law jurisdiction, and does not necessarily apply to other jurisdictions.
Statute laws are cited not by parliament, but rather by parliamentary session. A parliament usually has multiple sessions. An "adjournment" interrupts a session, a "prorogation" ends a session, and a "dissolution" ends a parliament. A session is labeled by the regnal year in which that session sat up until its prorogation.
In English tradition, a parliamentary session passes only one public act or "statute", albeit an act with various "chapters". English legal statutes are cited by parliamentary session labeled by the regnal year in which that session sat. So the citation "15 Charles II c. 4" means "the fourth chapter of the statute passed by the parliamentary session that sat in the 15th year of the reign of Charles II".
If a single parliamentary session overlaps the regnal year start date, it is given a double-label, e.g. Charles II's regnal year begins January 30, so the parliamentary session that ran from October 1670 to April 1671 is labeled "22 & 23 Charles II" (the session that sat from the 22nd to the 23rd year of Charles II's reign).
If there are two sessions within the same regnal year, they are differentiated by a "statute" or "session" suffix (e.g. 13 Charles II St. 1 is a different session than 13 Charles II St. 2). Finally, some sessions were prorogued without passing an act, and thus have no legal statute label at all.
In the event of two sessions within the same regnal year, the chapter numbering would reset and the sessions are differentiated by the suffixes: "statute 1" & "statute 2" (abbreviated "stat.1" and "stat.2" or "st.1" and "st.2") or alternatively "session 1" and "session 2" (abbreviated "sess.1" and "sess.2" or "s.1" and "s.2"). It is sometimes alleged that "sess.2" is used if it is a new session of a continuing parliament and "stat.2" if it is the first session of a new parliament. But that does not seem to be consistently true. Whether "sess." or "stat." is applied depends on the compilation used.
For example, Mary I, whose regnal start date is on 6 July 1553, had three parliamentary sessions within her first regnal year - two sessions within her first parliament (Oct-Dec, 1553), and a third session in her second parliament (Apr-May, 1554). The Treason Act 1553 is cited "1 Mar. sess.1 c.1" is it was passed in the first session of her first parliament, [17] while Legitimacy of the Queen, etc. Act 1553 is cited "1 Mar. sess. 2 c. 1" as it was passed in the second session of her first parliament [18] and finally Queen Regent's Prerogative Act 1554 is cited as "1 Mar. sess. 3 c. 1" as it was passed in the first session of her second parliament. [19] All three are within her first regnal year (6 July 1553 to 5 Jul 1554).
The Riot Act is cited as "1 Geo. stat. 2. c. 5", was passed in the first session of the second parliament of the first year of the reign of George I.
The Long Parliament presents an anomaly, since it was convened by the King Charles I of England on 3 November 1640 and went through various incarnations until it was finally dissolved on 16 March 1660. Since its first session of 1640 was never prorogued by royal command, its first session officially never ended, and all its surviving acts are labeled "16 Charles I".
Before the modern era, a statute of parliament was usually only given royal assent on the last day of the parliamentary session (just before prorogation). Even if assent for a specific act was actually given earlier, it was not noted in the statute text. So the order of chapters in a statute is usually meaningless, and gives no indication of when during the session it actually passed. Historians trying to affix a conventional calendar date to a specific act have to dig for clues in the Commons Journal, or simply assume all acts were assented at once on the final day. This was changed by the Acts of Parliament (Commencement) Act 1793 (33 Geo.3 c.13) which required the clerk of parliament to explicitly record the date of passage and assent. So it is only from 1794 onwards that statutes explicitly include the calendar date of an act.
Peculiarly, before 1794, it was also the case that an act was assumed to go into legal effect not on the final day of the session (the date of royal assent), but rather on the first day of the session in which it was passed. That means that parliamentary acts applied retrospectively to the start of the session, several weeks or months before they were actually passed and assented. To avoid injustices, it was common for parliamentary legislation to explicitly specify in the text the date when a new law, regulation, or tax would begin to apply. But not always. If a commencement date was not specified, the parliamentary act applied retrospectively to the start of the session, and magistrates could prosecute or impose penalties on actions that were perfectly legal at the time. This often provoked indignation and outrage. William Blackstone, in his influential 1765 Commentaries, railed against retrospective laws, insisting laws should apply only to the future. [20] Remembering the English experience, Americans were careful to include a categorical prohibition on ex post facto laws in the US Constitution in 1789. The 1793 Commencement Act finally remedied this, and thereafter laws only applied from the date of assent recorded by the clerk in the statute. This was reinforced in the Interpretation Act 1978.
The pre-1794 custom of retrospective dating may cause confusion in the "short titles" for statutes which happen to have a year in the title. Parliamentary sessions often started in Autumn and continued into Spring. So an act that was passed in, say, the Spring of 1554 might nonetheless be given the year "1553" in its short title - as that is when the session began, and thus when the act came into retrospective force. Thus historians often have to tangle with the awkwardness of citing an "act of 1553" responding to events occurring in 1554. Careful writers will take care to mention the actual year of passage in the historical narrative if there is risk of confusion with the year in the short title. Careless writers might not make notice of it and let readers assume the short title year is the actual year of passage, e.g. the Bubble Act (6 George I c.18) passed in June 1720 is sometimes mistakenly cited in history books as being passed in 1719 (long before the South Sea Bubble began!) simply because its legal short title is the "Royal Exchange and London Assurance Corporation Act 1719" (the session started in November 1719).
Citation labels are not always consistent, and depends on the statute compilation used.
For historical researchers, the most prominent compilations of statutes are the popular Statutes at Large (ed. Owen Ruffhead, 1762–65) [21] and the similarly-named contemporary rival Statutes at Large (ed. Danby Pickering 1762–66) [22] The labels and numbering in Ruffhead and Pickering compilations are identical, and so interchangeable. But their regnal year titles sometimes differ considerably from the official The Statutes of the Realm (ed. John Raithby, 1810–22, for the Record Commission, covering acts up to 1714). [23] So when citing old statutes before 1714 it is sometimes necessary to check for variances and make note of which compilation is being used. [24]
The fourth major historical compilation entering the fray was the Statutes at Large of England and Great Britain (ed. T.E. Tomlins and John Raithby,1811, covering acts before 1800), [25] which is continued as the Statutes of the United Kingdom and Ireland (acts from 1801 until 1869). [26]
All these statute compilations (except for the Statutes of the Realm) are unofficial, put out by private editors and printers. While well-regarded and treated as authoritative by the legal profession, there was no guarantee they were complete, or that their wording was correct and the law was as stated.
Since Medieval times, actual law in force was as stated on Statute Rolls (until 1483) and thereafter on Parliament Rolls (until 1850). A roll was literally a long continuous scroll of vellum parchment, upon which the acts ("chapters") of a parliamentary session, passed and assented, were written down. The rolls were stored in various scattered locations around Westminster and London, up until the establishment of the Public Records Office in 1838.
In 1796, a select parliamentary committee, under the chairmanship of Charles Abbott, reviewed the private statute compilations, and their report concluded that they were inadequate - some statutes were missing entirely, others had missing clauses, some had been repealed, etc. [27] They recommended the establishment of a Record Commission to oversee the publication of a "authentic and entire record" from the English statute rolls. The official The Statutes of the Realm (1817–22) was the result of this effort. However it only went as far as 1714. Legal professionals still had to rely on the Statutes at Large compilations put out by private publishers until the 1860s.
A Statute Law Commission was established in 1854 under lord chancellor Robert Rolfe, 1st Baron Cranworth to overhaul the compilation of statutes. During this process, they also composed parliamentary bills to formally repeal and clear statutes that are no longer in force, and consolidate some scattered acts into a new comprehensive bills. A Statute Law Committee was appointed in 1868 under the Lord Chancellor Hugh Cairns, 1st Earl Cairns, who took over the publication of the compilation. The committee published a series of volumes known as The Statutes Revised from 1870 to 1885, compiling existing statute law down to 1878, and regarded as official. [28] After a series of additional acts consolidating statutes, a second revised edition was put out in 1888, removing the ones that were repealed. The Statutes Second Revised edition compiles statutes from 1235 down to 1920. [29] The official Statutes Revised collections follow the Statutes of the Realm labels until 1714, and the Statutes at Large labels thereafter. [24]