Chinese era name | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional Chinese | 年號 | ||||||||||||
Simplified Chinese | 年号 | ||||||||||||
Hanyu Pinyin | niánhào | ||||||||||||
Literal meaning | year name | ||||||||||||
|
Chinese era names were titles used by various Chinese dynasties and regimes in Imperial China for the purpose of year identification and numbering. The first monarch to adopt era names was the Emperor Wu of Han in 140 BCE, [1] [2] and this system remained the official method of year identification and numbering until the establishment of the Republic of China in 1912 CE,when the era name system was superseded by the Republic of China calendar. Other polities in the Sinosphere—Korea,Vietnam and Japan—also adopted the concept of era name as a result of Chinese politico-cultural influence. [2] [3] [4]
Chinese era names were titles adopted for the purpose of identifying and numbering years in Imperial China. Era names originated as mottos or slogans chosen by the reigning monarch and usually reflected the political,economic and/or social landscapes at the time. For instance,the first era name proclaimed by the Emperor Wu of Han,Jianyuan (建元;lit. "establishing the origin"),was reflective of its status as the first era name. Similarly,the era name Jianzhongjingguo (建中靖國;lit. "establishing a moderate and peaceful country") used by the Emperor Huizong of Song was indicative of Huizong's idealism towards moderating the rivalry among the conservative and progressive parties regarding political and social reforms.
The process of declaring an era name was referred to in traditional Chinese historical texts as jiànyuán (建元). Declaring an era name to replace an existing era name was known as gǎiyuán (改元;lit. "change the origin"). Instituting a new era name would reset the numbering of the year back to year one or yuán (元). On the first day of the Chinese calendar,the numbering of the year would increase by one. To name a year using an era name only requires counting years from the first year of the era. For example,609 CE was the fifth year of Daye (大業;lit. "great endeavour"),as the era began in 605 CE;traditional Chinese sources would therefore refer to 609 CE as Dàyèwǔnián (大業五年).
The numbering of the year would still increase on the first day of the Chinese calendar each year,regardless of the month in which the era name was adopted. For example,as the Emperor Daizong of Tang replaced the era name Yongtai (永泰;lit. "perpetual peace") with Dali (大曆;lit. "great era") in the eleventh month of the Chinese calendar in 766 CE,the first year of Dali thus only consisted of the last two months of that particular year;the second year of Dali began on the first day of the Chinese calendar the following year,just two months after its initiation.
When a new monarch ascended to the throne,he could either declare a new era immediately or inherit the usage of the existing era name from his predecessor. For example,the era name Wutai (武泰;lit. "exalted martial") of the Emperor Xiaoming of Northern Wei was immediately replaced with Jianyi (建義;lit. "establishing justice") when the Emperor Xiaozhuang of Northern Wei took the throne. On the other hand,the era name Tianxian (天顯;lit. "heavenly intent") was originally proclaimed by the Emperor Taizu of Liao but its usage was continued by the Emperor Taizong of Liao upon assuming the throne.
There were numerous era names that saw repeated use throughout Chinese history. For instance,the era name Taiping (太平;lit. "great peace") was used on at least seven occasions. In such cases,Chinese sources would often affix the name of the dynasty or the ruler before the era name.
Most Chinese era names consisted of two Chinese characters,even though era names with three,four and six characters also existed. Shijianguo (始建國;lit. "the beginning of establishing a country") of the Xin dynasty,Tiancewansui (天冊萬歲;lit. "Heaven-conferred longevity") of the Wu Zhou,and Tiancilishengguoqing (天賜禮盛國慶;lit. "Heaven-bestowed ritualistic richness,nationally celebrated") of the Western Xia are examples of Chinese era names that bore more than two characters.
Era names were symbols of political orthodoxy and legitimacy. Hence,most Chinese monarchs would proclaim a new era upon the founding of a new dynasty. Rebel leaders who sought to establish independence and legitimacy also declared their own era names. Often,vassal states and tributary states of Imperial China would officially adopt the era name of the reigning Chinese monarch as a sign of subordination—a practice known as fèng zhēng shuò (奉正朔;lit. "following the first month of the year and the first day of the month"). [5] [6] For example,Korean regimes like Silla,Goryeo and Joseon had at various times formally adopted the era names of the Tang,Wu Zhou,Later Liang,Later Tang,Later Jin,Later Han,Later Zhou,Northern Song,Liao,Jin,Yuan,Northern Yuan,Ming,and Qing dynasties of China for both domestic and diplomatic purposes.
The Emperor Wu of Han is conventionally regarded as the first ruler to declare an era name. [1] [2] Prior to the introduction of the first era name in 140 BCE,Chinese monarchs utilized the Qianyuan (前元),Zhongyuan (中元) and Houyuan (後元) systems to identify and number years.
Prior to the Ming dynasty,it was common for Chinese sovereigns to change the era name during their reigns,resulting in the use of more than one era name for one ruler. For instance,Emperor Xuan of Han used a total of seven era names during his reign.
The Hongwu Emperor started the tradition of having only one era name for one monarch—known as the yíshìyìyuán zhì (一世一元制;lit. "one-era-name-for-a-reign system"). [7] Thus,modern historians would frequently refer to monarchs of the Ming and Qing dynasties by their respective era name. Notable exceptions to this "one-era-name" tradition included Zhu Qizhen who proclaimed two era names for his two separate reigns,Aisin Gioro Hong Taiji who used two era names to reflect his position as khan of the Later Jin and later as emperor of the Qing dynasty,as well as Aisin Gioro Puyi who adopted three era names in his capacity as emperor of the Qing dynasty and subsequently as ruler of Manchukuo.
With the establishment of the Republic of China in 1912 CE,the Chinese era name system was superseded by the Republic of China calendar which remains in official use in Taiwan,Penghu,Kinmen,and Matsu Islands. The Republic of China calendar,while not an era name,is based on the era name system of Imperial China. Numerous attempts to reinstate monarchical rule in China had resulted in the declaration of additional era names after the founding of the Republic,but these regimes and their associated era names were short-lived.
In 1949,the People's Republic of China was founded and the era was changed to the Common Era,for both internal and external affairs in mainland China. This notation was extended to Hong Kong in 1997 and Macau in 1999 (de facto extended in 1966) through Annex III of Hong Kong Basic Law and Macau Basic Law,thus eliminating the ROC calendar in these areas.
The concept of era name also saw its adoption by neighboring Korea and Vietnam since the middle of the 6th century CE,and by Japan since the middle of the 7th century CE. [2] [3] [4] Notably,Japan still officially retains the use of era names today. [4]
While the era system is a more traditional system of dating that preserves Chinese and Japanese culture, it presents a problem for the more globalized Asian society and for everyday life.
For example, even though within the nation people will know what era they are in, it is relatively meaningless for other nations. In addition, while the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan only recognize documents dated in the Era System, their treaties with other countries are in the Dionysian Era (AD) system. In modern times, only Republic of China and Japan still continue to use the ancient Chinese era naming system.
Even in the domestic arena, the era system can present difficult dilemmas. For example, in Japan, it is difficult to keep track of the age of people who were born in the previous era. Also, while the ROC and Japan both continue to use the ancient Chinese era system, since they have partially adopted the Gregorian calendar for non-governmental use, it is more difficult to track down dates that fall on February 29 leap year in the Western calendar.
Furthermore, in Japan, in theory it is difficult to mention future dates since it is sometimes hard to tell whether the current emperor will live long enough for its citizens to use that era name. However, in practice, documents like driver's licenses and 50-year leases use era dates without regard to this problem.
On the other hand, others[ who? ] suggest that the AD system has too much Christian connotation behind it and it is a form of cultural imperialism when an essentially European system of dating is forced upon other civilizations with their own long-used and equally legitimate dating systems. However, with globalization, the AD system is becoming more acceptable in Japan and the ROC.
Modern history researchers do not care about era names except for supporting other arguments, such as figuring out the biases and attitudes of a particular historian;[ citation needed ] however, era names are useful for dating events that were unique in Chinese history. Most Chinese dictionaries have a comprehensive list of era names, while booklets of more detailed and often searchable lists can be found in libraries.
There are various types and subtypes of the Chinese calendar and horology, which over a millennium plus history has produced many variations, currently mainly associated with the 21st century nation state of the Peoples Republic of China. The topic of the Chinese calendar includes various traditional types of the Chinese calendar, of which particularly prominent are, identifying years, months, and days according to astronomical phenomena and calculations, with generally an especial effort to correlate the solar and lunar cycles experienced on earth—but which are known to mathematically require some degree of approximation. Typical features of early calendars include the use of the sexagenary cycle-based ganzhi system's repeating cycles of Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches. The logic of the various permutations of the Chinese calendar has been based in considerations such as the technical from mathematics and astronomy, the philosophical considerations, and the political, and the resulting disparities between different calendars is significant and notable. Various similar calendar systems are also known from various regions or ethnic groups of Central Asia, South Asia, and other areas. Indeed, the Chinese calendar has influenced and been influenced by most parts of the world these days. One particularly popular feature is the Chinese zodiac. The Chinese calendar and horology includes many multifaceted methods of computing years, eras, months, days and hours.
The Chinese sovereign was the ruler of a particular monarchical regime in the historical periods of ancient China and imperial China. Sovereigns ruling the same regime, and descended from the same paternal line, constituted a dynasty. Several titles and naming schemes have been used throughout Chinese history.
Huangdi or Emperor of China was the superlative title held by monarchs of China who ruled various imperial dynasties in Chinese history. In traditional Chinese political theory, the emperor of China was considered the Son of Heaven and the autocrat of all under Heaven worshipped posthumously under an imperial cult. Under the Han dynasty, Confucianism gained sanction as the official political theory and succession in most cases theoretically followed agnatic primogeniture. The lineage of emperors descended from a paternal family line constituted a dynasty.
A posthumous name is an honorary name given mainly to revered dead people in East Asian culture. It is predominantly used in East Asian countries such as China, Korea, Vietnam, Japan, and Thailand. Reflecting on the person's accomplishments or reputation, the title is assigned after death and essentially replaces the name used during life. Although most posthumous names are given to royalty, some posthumous names are given to honour significant people without hereditary titles, such as courtiers or military generals.
Korean era names were titles adopted in historical Korea for the purpose of year identification and numbering. Era names were used during the period of Silla, Goguryeo, Balhae, Taebong, Goryeo, Joseon, and the Korean Empire. Various Korean regimes officially adopted the era names of Chinese dynasties.
For most of its history, China was organized into various dynastic states under the rule of hereditary monarchs. Beginning with the legendary establishment of dynastic rule by Yu the Great c. 2070 BC, and ending with the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in 1912, Chinese historiography came to organize itself around the succession of imperial dynasties. Besides those led by the dominant Han ethnic group or their spiritual Huaxia predecessors, dynasties throughout Chinese history were established by non-Han peoples.
A regnal year is a year of the reign of a sovereign, from the Latin regnum meaning kingdom, rule. Regnal years considered the date as an ordinal, not a cardinal number. For example, a monarch could have a first year of rule, a second year of rule, a third year of rule, and so on, but not a zeroth year of rule.
The yang (양/兩) was the currency of the Korean states Joseon and the Korean Empire between 1892 and 1902. It was subdivided into 10 jeon (전/錢) or 100 bun (분/分); and 5 yang = 1 hwan (환/圜).
The Empire of China was a short-lived attempt by Chinese president Yuan Shikai from late 1915 to early 1916 to reinstate the monarchy in China, with himself as emperor. The attempt ultimately failed, set back the republican cause by several years, and led China into a period of fracture and conflict among various local warlords.
Ancient Chinese coinage includes some of the earliest known coins. These coins, used as early as the Spring and Autumn period (770–476 BCE), took the form of imitations of the cowrie shells that were used in ceremonial exchanges. The same period also saw the introduction of the first metal coins; however, they were not initially round, instead being either knife shaped or spade shaped. Round metal coins with a round, and then later square hole in the center were first introduced around 350 BCE. The beginning of the Qin dynasty (221–206 BCE), the first dynasty to unify China, saw the introduction of a standardised coinage for the whole Empire. Subsequent dynasties produced variations on these round coins throughout the imperial period. At first the distribution of the coinage was limited to use around the capital city district, but by the beginning of the Han dynasty, coins were widely used for such things as paying taxes, salaries and fines.
The Republic of China calendar, often shortened to the ROC calendar or the Minguo calendar, is a calendar used in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu. The calendar uses 1912, the year of the establishment of the Republic of China (ROC) in Nanjing, as the first year.
This is a family tree of Chinese monarchs from the Yuan dynasty to the end of the Qing dynasty.
During the late Zhou dynasty, the inhabitants of the Central Plains began to make a distinction between Hua and Yi, referred to be some historians as the Sino–barbarian dichotomy. They defined themselves as part of cultural and political region known as Huaxia, which they contrasted with the surrounding regions home to outsiders, conventionally known as the Four Barbarians. Although Yi is usually translated as "barbarian", other translations of this term in English include "foreigners", "ordinary others", "wild tribes" and "uncivilized tribes". The Hua–Yi distinction asserted Chinese superiority, but implied that outsiders could become Hua by adopting their culture and customs. These concepts were not unique to Ancient China, but were also applied by the Vietnamese, Japanese, and Koreans, all of whom considered themselves at one point in history to be the "Central Kingdom" in imitation of China.
Emperor at home, king abroad was a system of conducting relations between states within the Chinese cultural sphere. Rulers of lesser regimes would adopt the title of emperor and/or other imperial titles domestically, and adopt the title of king when dealing with the dominant Chinese regime. Instead of using the styles Imperial Majesty and Majesty (陛下), rulers of lesser realms were styled as Highness (殿下). This system was applicable to Japan, Korea and Vietnam, as well as less powerful Chinese states, among others.
China was a monarchy from prehistoric times up to 1912, when a republic was established. The succession of legendary monarchs of China were non-hereditary. Dynastic rule began c. 2070 BC when Yu the Great established the Xia dynasty, and monarchy lasted until 1912 when dynastic rule collapsed together with the monarchical government. Various attempts at preserving and restoring the Chinese monarchy occurred during and following the Xinhai Revolution, but these regimes were short-lived and lacked widespread recognition.
The debate on the "Chineseness" of the Yuan and Qing dynasties is concerned with whether the Mongol-led Yuan dynasty (1271–1368) and the Manchu-led Qing dynasty (1636–1912) can be considered "Chinese dynasties", and whether they were representative of "China" during the respective historical periods. The debate, albeit historiographical in nature, has political implications. Mainstream academia and successive governments of China, including the imperial governments of the Yuan and Qing dynasties, have maintained the view that they were "Chinese" and representative of "China". In short, the cause of the controversy stems from the dispute in interpreting the relationship between the two concepts of "Han Chinese" and "China", because although the Chinese government recognizes 56 ethnic groups in China and the Han have a more open view of the Yuan and Qing dynasties since Liang Qichao and other royalist reformers supported the Qing dynasty, the Han are China's main ethnic group. This means that there are many opinions that equate Han Chinese people with China and lead to criticism of the legitimacy of these two dynasties.