Fog of war

Last updated

The fog of war (German : Nebel des Krieges) is the uncertainty in situational awareness experienced by participants in military operations. [1] The term seeks to capture the uncertainty regarding one's own capability, adversary capability, and adversary intent during an engagement, operation, or campaign. Military forces try to reduce the fog of war through military intelligence and friendly force tracking systems.

Contents

The term has become commonly used to define uncertainty mechanics in wargames.

Origin

The word "fog" (German : Nebel), but not the exact phrase, in reference to 'uncertainty in war' was introduced by the Prussian military analyst Carl von Clausewitz in his posthumously published book, Vom Kriege (1832), the English translation of which was published as On War (1873):

War is the realm of uncertainty; three quarters of the factors on which action in war is based are wrapped in a fog of greater or lesser uncertainty. A sensitive and discriminating judgment is called for; a skilled intelligence to scent out the truth.

Carl von Clausewitz [2]

It has been pointed out that von Clausewitz does not use the exact phrase "fog of war", and also uses multiple similar metaphors, such as "twilight" and "moonlight", to describe a 'lack of clarity'. [3]


The first known use of the exact phrase in text dates to 1836 in a poem entitled "The Battle of Bunker Hill" by McDonald Clarke. [4] The poem describes an assault by British forces upon an American redoubt during the 1775 Battle of Bunker Hill:


"Will they dare a third attack?

Is a question seen in every eye; Old Put across the neck and back,

Rides slowly, their vengeance to defy—

Wildy, in that deadly hour,

The Ramparts shove their bolted shower,

While mid the waving fog of war,

Thunders the Yankee’s loud hurrah" [5]


The first known attempt to explicitly define the "fog of war" in a military text was made in 1896 in a book titled The Fog of War by Sir Lonsdale Augustus Hale, where it is described as "the state of ignorance in which commanders frequently find themselves as regards the real strength and position, not only of their foes, but also of their friends." [6]

Military

The fog of war is a reality in all military conflict. Precision and certainty are unattainable goals, but modern military doctrine suggests a trade-off of precision and certainty for speed and agility. Militaries employ command and control (C2) systems and doctrine to partially alleviate the fog of war.

The term also applies to the experience of individual soldiers in battle: often cited is the pure confusion of direction, location, and perspective on a battlefield. Officers and soldiers become separated, orders become confused and subject to revision with poor communication. Sounds and vision are limited from the perspective of the individual and may not be easily resolved, resulting in a continuing uncertainty, a perceptual "fog".

The fog of war has been decreasing as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance technology is improving. In 2016, Chief of Staff of the United States Army Gen. Mark A. Milley stated that "On the future battlefield, if you stay in one place longer than two or three hours, you will be dead... With enemy drones and sensors constantly on the hunt for targets, there won't even be time for four hours' unbroken sleep." [7]

Simulations and games

A block wargame, Richard III by Columbia Games, showing the fog of war in play: the red player can see the identity of his own pieces, but not those of the white player. Richard III from Columbia Games.jpg
A block wargame, Richard III by Columbia Games, showing the fog of war in play: the red player can see the identity of his own pieces, but not those of the white player.

Abstract and military board games sometimes try to capture the effect of the fog of war by hiding the identity of playing pieces, by keeping them face down or turned away from the opposing player (as in Stratego ) or covered (as in Squad Leader [8] ). Other games, such as the Dark chess and Kriegspiel chess-variants, playing pieces could be hidden from the players by using a duplicate, hidden game board. [9]

Another version of fog of war emulation is used by block wargaming where, much like Stratego, the blocks face each player, hiding their value. However, this also allows for incremental damage, where the block is rotated up to four times to indicate battle damage before the unit is eliminated from the playing field.[ citation needed ]

Solitaire games also by their nature attempt to recreate fog of war using random dice rolls or card draws to determine events. [10] Complex double-blind miniature wargames, including military simulations, may make use of two identical maps or model landscapes, one or more referees providing limited intelligence to the opposing sides, participants in the roles of sub-unit leaders, and the use of radio sets or intercoms.[ citation needed ]

In video games

In the computer game Freeciv, completely unexplored areas are fully black, while explored but currently unobserved areas are covered in a grey shroud. Freeciv-net-screenshot-2011-06-23.png
In the computer game Freeciv , completely unexplored areas are fully black, while explored but currently unobserved areas are covered in a grey shroud.

A computer's ability to effectively hide information from a player is seen as a distinct advantage over board games when simulating war. [11] Fog of war in strategy video games refers to enemy units, and often terrain, being hidden from the player; this is lifted once the area is explored, but the information is often fully or partially re-hidden whenever the player does not have a unit in that area. [12]

The earliest use of fog of war was in the 1977 game Empire by Walter Bright. [13] Another early use of fog of war was the 1978 game Tanktics designed by Chris Crawford, which was criticized for its unreliable and "confusing" fog of war system. [14] Crawford, in 1982, suggested "limit[ing] the amount of information available to the human player" to compensate for the computer's lack of intelligence. [15] In a 1988 Computer Gaming World article Dave Arneson called fog of war "one of the biggest 'plus' factors in computer simulations", while Crawford concluded, using Tanktics as an example, that video game fog of war systems became less "fun" the more realistic they were, leading the medium to instead use simplified systems. [16]

Two large Blizzard franchises, Warcraft and StarCraft , use a fog of war which only reveals terrain features and enemy units through a player's reconnaissance. Without a unit actively observing, previously revealed areas of the map are subject to a shroud through which only terrain is visible, but changes in enemy units or bases are not. [17] This is also common in both turn-based and real-time strategy games, such as League of Legends , the Close Combat series, Total War series, Age of Empires series, Red Alert series, Advance Wars series, Fire Emblem series, Sid Meier's Civilization series, and the Supreme Commander series.[ citation needed ]

Fog of war gives players an incentive to uncover a game's world. A compulsion to reveal obscured parts of a map has been described to give a sense of exploring the unknown. [18] Crawford said that "reasonable" uses of fog of war, such as needing to send out scouts, "not only seem natural, but ... add to the realism and excitement of the game" [15] Merchant Prince displays over unexplored territory what Computer Gaming World described as a "renaissance-style map of dubious accuracy". [19] In some strategy games that make use of fog of war, enemy AI may have knowledge of the positions of all other units and buildings on the map regardless, to compensate for lack of true intelligence, which players may consider as cheating if discovered. [20] A designer may use fog of war to keep a game that has become impossible to win enjoyable, by hiding this fact from the player. [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carl von Clausewitz</span> Prussian general and military theorist (1780–1831)

Carl Philipp Gottfriedvon Clausewitz was a Prussian general and military theorist who stressed the "moral" and political aspects of waging war. His most notable work, Vom Kriege, though unfinished at his death, is considered a seminal treatise on military strategy and science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wargame</span> Strategy game that realistically simulates war

A wargame is a strategy game in which two or more players command opposing armed forces in a simulation of some military operation. Wargaming may be played for recreation, to train military officers in the art of strategic thinking, or to study the nature of potential conflicts. Many wargames re-create specific historic battles, and can cover either whole wars, or any campaigns, battles, or lower-level engagements within them. Many simulate land combat, but there are wargames for naval and air combat, as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strategy game</span> Type of game

A strategy game or strategic game is a game in which the players' uncoerced, and often autonomous, decision-making skills have a high significance in determining the outcome. Almost all strategy games require internal decision tree-style thinking, and typically very high situational awareness.

<i>The Ancient Art of War</i> 1984 video game

The Ancient Art of War is a video game designed by Dave and Barry Murry, developed by Evryware, and published by Broderbund in 1984. It is recognized as one of the first real-time strategy or real-time tactics games.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles S. Roberts Award</span>

The Charles S. Roberts Awards is an annual award for excellence in manual, tabletop games, with a focus on "conflict simulations", which includes simulations of non-military as well as military conflicts, as well as simulations of related historical topics. From its founding in 1975 through 2021, the award was almost exclusively focused on historical wargaming, changing to a broader "conflict simulations" in award year 2022.

<i>Tanktics: Computer Game of Armored Combat on the Eastern Front</i> 1976 video game

Tanktics: Computer Game of Armored Combat on the Eastern Front is a 1976 two-player tank battle computer wargame by Chris Crawford. It was Crawford's first video game. He initially self-published it as Wargy I. It was published by Avalon Hill in 1981 as Tanktics.

<i>Dune II</i> 1992 video game

Dune II: The Building of a Dynasty is a 1992 real-time strategy game developed by Westwood Studios and published by Virgin Games. It serves as the sequel to Dune (1992).

<i>Patton Versus Rommel</i> 1986 video game

Patton vs. Rommel is a computer wargame designed and programmed by Chris Crawford for the Macintosh and published by Electronic Arts in 1986. Versions for MS-DOS compatible operating systems and Commodore 64 were developed by Sculptured Software and published in 1987.

Real-time tactics (RTT) is a subgenre of tactical wargames played in real-time, simulating the considerations and circumstances of operational warfare and military tactics. It is differentiated from real-time strategy gameplay by the lack of classic resource micromanagement and base or unit building, as well as the greater importance of individual units and a focus on complex battlefield tactics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Block wargame</span> Wargame

A block wargame is a board wargame that represents military units using wooden blocks instead of cardboard counters or metal/plastic miniatures.

<i>Kriegsspiel</i> 19th century Prussian wargame

Kriegsspiel is a genre of wargaming developed by the Prussian Army in the 19th century to teach battlefield tactics to officers. The word Kriegsspiel literally means "wargame" in German, but in the context of the English language it refers specifically to the wargames developed by the Prussian army in the 19th century. Kriegsspiel was the first wargaming system to have been adopted by a military organization as a serious tool for training and research. It is characterized by high realism, an emphasis on the experience of decision-making rather than on competition, and the use of an umpire to keep the rules flexible and manage hidden information. After Prussia's impressive victory over France in the Franco-Prussian War, other countries began designing similar wargames for their own armies.

<i>Battleground 4: Shiloh</i> 1996 video game

Battleground 4: Shiloh is a turn-based computer wargame developed by TalonSoft in 1996 and the fourth issue in the Battleground series.

<i>Battleground 7: Bull Run</i> 1997 wargame video game

Battleground 7: Bull Run is a 1997 computer wargame developed and published by TalonSoft. It is the seventh entry in the Battleground series.

<i>Battleground 5: Antietam</i> 1996 video game

Battleground 5: Antietam is a 1996 computer wargame developed by TalonSoft in 1996, the fifth issue in the popular Battleground series.

<i>Legionnaire</i> (video game) Real-time tactics strategy computer game from 1982 for Atari computers

Legionnaire is a computer wargame for the Atari 8-bit series created by Chris Crawford in 1982, and released through Avalon Hill. Recreating Julius Caesar's campaigns in a semi-historical setting, the player takes command of the Roman legions in real-time battles against the barbarians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Computer wargame</span> Wargame played on a computer or other digital device

A computer wargame is a wargame played on a digital device. Descended from board wargaming, it simulates military conflict at the tactical, operational or strategic level. Computer wargames are both sold commercially for recreational use and, in some cases, used for military purposes.

Strategy is a major video game genre that emphasizes thinking and planning over direct instant action in order to achieve victory. Although many types of video games can contain strategic elements, as a genre, strategy games are most commonly defined as those with a primary focus on high-level strategy, logistics and resource management. They are also usually divided into two main sub-categories: turn-based and real-time, but there are also many strategy cross/sub-genres that feature additional elements such as tactics, diplomacy, economics and exploration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Professional wargaming</span>

A wargame, generally, is a type of strategy game which realistically simulates warfare. A professional wargame, specifically, is a wargame that is used by military organizations to train officers in tactical and strategic decision-making, to test new tactics and strategies, or to predict trends in future conflicts. This is in contrast to recreational wargames, which are designed for fun and competition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recreational wargaming</span> Aspect of gaming

A wargame is a strategy game that realistically simulates warfare. Wargames were invented for the purpose of training military officers, but they eventually caught on in civilian circles, played recreationally.

<i>Kriegspiel</i> (board wargame)

Kriegspiel is a board wargame published by Avalon Hill in 1970 that simulates a hypothetical war between two nations. Although the simple game sold well to new players, it received negative reviews by more experienced gamers.

References

  1. Joint Service Command and Staff College, Advanced Command and Staff Course Notes dated 2001
  2. Carl von Clausewitz, Vom Kriege , Book 1, Chapter 3.
  3. Eugenia C. Kiesling (2001). "On War Without the Fog" (PDF). Military Review. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
  4. Wheatley, Kim (2022). Uncertainty Engineering: A Genealogy of the Fog of War (PhD). Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland. pp. 73–78.
  5. Clarke, M'Donald (1836). Poems of M’Donald Clarke. J. W. Bell. p. 188.
  6. “The fog of war”, by Col. Lonsdale Hale, Royal Engineers (retired), Aldershot Military Academy, 24 March 1896.
  7. Freedberg, Sydney J. Jr. (5 October 2016). "Miserable, Disobedient & Victorious: Gen. Milley's Future US Soldier". breakingdefense.com. Retrieved 26 April 2021.
  8. Squad Leader Rulebook, 4th Edition, section 25.0.
  9. Kriegspiel by Hans L. Bodlaender.
  10. Pulsipher, Lewis (2012). Game Design: How to Create Video and Tabletop Games, Start to Finish. McFarland. p. 227. ISBN   978-0-786-46952-9.
  11. Sipe, Russell, ed. (April 1984). "Carrier Force: The Fog of War at its Foggiest". Computer Gaming World . Vol. 4, no. 2. pp. 22, 47. Retrieved 15 March 2017.
  12. Adams, Ernest (2014). Fundamentals of Game Design (3 ed.). New Riders Press. ISBN   978-0-321-92967-9.
  13. Lewin, Christopher George (2012). "8". War Games and their History. Stroud, Great Britain: Fonthill Media. ISBN   978-1-78155-042-7.
  14. Proctor, Bob (January 1982). "Tanktics: Review and Analysis". Computer Gaming World . pp. 17–20.
  15. 1 2 Crawford, Chris (December 1982). "Design Techniques and Ideas for Computer Games". BYTE. p. 96. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  16. Sipe, Russell, ed. (April 1988). ""Fog of War": A Clearer View". Computer Gaming World . No. 46. pp. 24–26, 52–53. Retrieved 15 March 2017.
  17. 1 2 Howell, Dave (2010). "StarCraft's Steps" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 November 2014. Retrieved 10 November 2014.
  18. Stowe, Jonah. "Power, Knowledge and the Fog of War". Gamechurch . Retrieved 6 November 2014.
  19. Carter, Tim (April 1994). "The Prince Of Bribes". Computer Gaming World. pp. 150, 152.
  20. Hagelbäck, Johan; Johansson, Stefan J. (2008). "Dealing with fog of war in a Real Time Strategy game environment" (PDF). 2008 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games. IEEE. pp. 55–62. doi:10.1109/CIG.2008.5035621. ISBN   978-1-4244-2973-8. S2CID   19086 . Retrieved 6 November 2014 via The University of Western Australia.

Further reading