Protected area

Last updated

World map with percentage of each country under protection (2005 data)
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
0-3.9% of the country is protected
3.9-11.3% protected
11.3-22.7% protected
22.7-41.8% protected
41.8-72.3% protected
no data Protected areas by percentage per country.svg
World map with percentage of each country under protection (2005 data)
  0–3.9% of the country is protected
  3.9–11.3% protected
  11.3–22.7% protected
  22.7–41.8% protected
  41.8–72.3% protected
  no data
Share of important terrestrial biodiversity areas under protection, as of 2018. Share of important terrerstrial biodiversity sites that are protected, OWID.svg
Share of important terrestrial biodiversity areas under protection, as of 2018.

Protected areas or conservation areas are locations which receive protection because of their recognized natural, ecological or cultural values. There are several kinds of protected areas, which vary by level of protection depending on the enabling laws of each country or the regulations of the international organizations involved. Generally speaking though, protected areas are understood to be those in which human presence or at least the exploitation of natural resources (e.g. firewood, non-timber forest products, water, ...) is limited. [1]

Contents

The term "protected area" also includes marine protected areas, the boundaries of which will include some area of ocean, and transboundary protected areas that overlap multiple countries which remove the borders inside the area for conservation and economic purposes. There are over 161,000 protected areas in the world (as of October 2010) [2] with more added daily, representing between 10 and 15 percent of the world's land surface area. [3] [4] [5]

As of 2016, there are 14,688 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), and approximately 14.7% of the world's terrestrial and inland water areas (excluding Antarctica) are protected. [6] For waters under national jurisdiction beyond inland waters, approximately 10.2% of coastal and marine areas and 4.12% of global ocean areas are covered by marine protected areas. [6] In contrast, only 0.25% of the world's oceans beyond national jurisdiction are covered by MPAs. [6] In recent years, the 30 by 30 initiative has targeted to protect 30% of ocean territory and 30% of land territory worldwide by 2030; this has been adopted by the European Union in its Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, Campaign for Nature which promoted the goal during the Convention on Biodiversity's COP15 Summit [7] and the G7. [8]

Protected areas are implemented for biodiversity conservation, often providing habitat and protection from hunting for threatened and endangered species. Protection helps maintain ecological processes that cannot survive in most intensely managed landscapes and seascapes. [9]

Definition

The definition that has been widely accepted across regional and global frameworks has been provided by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in its categorisation guidelines for protected areas. [10] [11] The definition is as follows: [12]

A clearly defined geographical space, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values.

Protection of natural resources

The objective of protected areas is to conserve biodiversity and to provide a way for measuring the progress of such conservation. Protected areas will usually encompass several other zones that have been deemed important for particular conservation uses, such as Important Bird Areas (IBA) and Endemic Bird Areas (EBA), Centres of Plant Diversity (CPD), Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas (ICCA), Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites (AZE) and Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA) among others. Likewise, a protected area or an entire network of protected areas may lie within a larger geographic zone that is recognised as a terrestrial or marine ecoregions (see Global 200), or a Crisis Ecoregions for example. [13] As a result, Protected Areas can encompass a broad range of governance types. A wide variety of rights-holders and stakeholders are involved in the governance and management of protected areas, including forest protected areas, such as government agencies and ministries at various levels, elected and traditional authorities, indigenous peoples and local communities, private individuals and non-profit trusts, among others. [12] Most protected-area and forest management institutions acknowledge the importance of recognizing the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, sharing the costs and benefits of protected areas and actively involving them in their governance and management. [12] This has led to the recognition of four main types of governance, defined on the basis of who holds authority, responsibility, and who can be held accountable for the key decisions for protected areas. [12] Indeed, governance of protected areas has emerged a critical factor in their success.

Subsequently, the range of natural resources that any one protected area may guard is vast. Many will be allocated primarily for species conservation whether it be flora or fauna or the relationship between them, but protected areas are similarly important for conserving sites of (indigenous) cultural importance and considerable reserves of natural resources such as;

Annual updates on each of these analyses are made in order to make comparisons to the Millennium Development Goals and several other fields of analysis are expected to be introduced in the monitoring of protected areas management effectiveness, such as freshwater and marine or coastal studies which are currently underway, and islands and drylands which are currently in planning. [17]

Protection of ecosystem services

Along with providing important stocks of natural resources, protected areas are often major sources of vital ecosystem services, unbeknownst to human society. [18] Although biodiversity is usually the main reason for constructing protected areas, the protection of biodiversity also protects the ecosystem services society enjoys. [19] Some ecosystem services include those that provide and regulate resources, support natural processes, or represent culture. [20] Provisioning services provide resources to humanity, such as fuel and water, while regulating services include carbon sequestration, climate regulation, and protection against disease. [21] Supporting ecosystem services include nutrient cycling, while cultural services are a source of aesthetic and cultural value for tourism and heritage. [21] Such services are often overlooked by humanity, due to the ecosystem from which they originate being far from urbanized areas. The contamination of ecosystem services within a designated area ultimately degrades their use for society. For example, the protection of a water body inherently protects that water body's microorganisms and their ability to adequately filter pollutants and pathogens, ultimately protecting water quality itself. [22] Therefore, the implementation of protected areas is vital to maintaining the quality and consistency of ecosystem services, ultimately allowing human society to function without the interference of human infrastructure or policies.

IUCN Protected Area Management Categories

Strict nature reserve Belianske Tatras in Slovakia Belianske Tatry.JPG
Strict nature reserve Belianske Tatras in Slovakia

Through its World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), the IUCN has developed six Protected Area Management Categories that define protected areas according to their management objectives, which are internationally recognised by various national governments and the United Nations. [23] The categories provide international standards for defining protected areas and encourage conservation planning according to their management aims. [24]

IUCN Protected Area Management Categories:

History

Black Opal Spring in Yellowstone National Park in the United States. Yellowstone, the world's second official protected area (after Mongolia's Bogd Khan Mountain), was declared a protected area in 1872, and it encompasses areas which are classified as both a National Park (Category II) and a Habitat Management Area (Category IV). Black Opal Spring in Biscuit Basin.JPG
Black Opal Spring in Yellowstone National Park in the United States. Yellowstone, the world's second official protected area (after Mongolia's Bogd Khan Mountain), was declared a protected area in 1872, and it encompasses areas which are classified as both a National Park (Category II) and a Habitat Management Area (Category IV).

Protected areas are cultural artifacts, and their story is entwined with that of human civilization. Protecting places and natural resources is by no means a modern concept, whether it be indigenous communities guarding sacred sites or the convention of European hunting reserves. Over 2000 years ago, royal decrees in India protected certain areas. In Europe, rich and powerful people protected hunting grounds for a thousand years. Moreover, the idea of protection of special places is universal: for example, it occurs among the communities in the Pacific ("tapu" areas) and in parts of Africa (sacred groves).

The oldest legally protected reserve recorded in history is the Main Ridge Forest Reserve, established by an ordinance dated 13 April 1776. [27] Other sources mention the 1778 approval of a protected area on then-Khan Uul, a mountain previous protected by local nomads for centuries in Mongolia, by then-ruling Qing China Tenger Tetgegch Khaan. However, the mass protected areas movement did not begin until late nineteenth-century in North America, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, when other countries were quick to follow suit. While the idea of protected areas spread around the world in the twentieth century, the driving force was different in different regions. Thus, in North America, protected areas were about safeguarding dramatic and sublime scenery; in Africa, the concern was with game parks; in Europe, landscape protection was more common. [28]

The designation of protected areas often also contained a political statement. In the 17th and 18th centuries, protected areas were mostly hunting grounds of rulers and thus, on the one hand, an expression of the absolute personal authority of a monarch, and on the other hand, they were concentrated in certain places and diminished with increasing spatial distance from the seat of power. In the late 19th century, modern territorial states emerged which, thanks to the transport and communication technologies of industrialisation and the closely meshed and well-connected administrative apparatus that came with it, could actually assert claims to power over large contiguous territories. The establishment of nature reserves in mostly peripheral regions thus became possible and at the same time underpinned the new state claim to power. [29]

Initially, protected areas were recognised on a national scale, differing from country to country until 1933, when an effort to reach an international consensus on the standards and terminology of protected areas took place at the International Conference for the Protection of Fauna and Flora in London. [30] At the 1962 First World Conference on National Parks in Seattle the effect the Industrial Revolution had had on the world's natural environment was acknowledged, and the need to preserve it for future generations was established. [31]

Since then, it has been an international commitment on behalf of both governments and non-government organisations to maintain the networks that hold regular revisions for the succinct categorisations that have been developed to regulate and record protected areas. In 1972, the Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment endorsed the protection of representative examples of all major ecosystem types as a fundamental requirement of national conservation programmes. This has become a core principle of conservation biology and has remained so in recent resolutions – including the World Charter for Nature in 1982, the Rio Declaration at the Earth Summit in 1992, and the Johannesburg Declaration 2002.

Recently, the importance of protected areas has been brought to the fore at the threat of human-induced global heating and the understanding of the necessity to consume natural resources in a sustainable manner. The spectrum of benefits and values of protected areas is recognised not only ecologically, but culturally through further development in the arena of Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas (ICCAs). International programmes for the protection of representative ecosystems remain relatively progressive (considering the environmental challenges of globalisation with respect to terrestrial environments), with less advances in marine and freshwater biomes.[ citation needed ]

Convention on Biological Diversity

In 1992, a protected area was defined in paragraph 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as "a geographically defined area which is designated or regulated and managed to achieve specific conservation objectives." Under Article 8 of the CBD, parties who entered the treaty agreed to, among other things, "establish a system of protected areas." In 2004, the CBD’s Conference of the Parties (COP) adopted the Program of Work on Protected Areas (PoWPA) to further develop and promote protected areas. PoWPA’s objective was the “establishment and maintenance by 2010 for terrestrial and by 2012 for marine areas of comprehensive, effectively managed, and ecologically representative national and regional systems of protected areas that collectively, inter alia through a global network contribute to achieving the three objectives of the Convention and the 2010 target to significantly reduce the current rate of biodiversity loss.” [32] In 2010, protected areas were included in Target 11 of the CBD’s Strategic Plan for Biodiversity, known as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Target 11 states:

“By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscapes.” [33]

In 2018, to complement protected areas across landscapes and seascapes, the term ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ was defined as “a geographically defined area other than a Protected Area, which is governed and managed in ways that achieve positive and sustained long-term outcomes for the in situ conservation of biodiversity, with associated ecosystem functions and services and where applicable, cultural, spiritual, socio-economic, and other locally relevant values.” [34] Other effective area-based conservation measures complement protected areas across landscapes, seascapes, and river basins [35] . Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures are referenced together in Target 3 of the draft Global Biodiversity Framework, which is due to be agreed at the 15th Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, which will be held December 5 to 17 in Montreal, Canada. [36]

Challenges

Schweizerischer National Park in the Swiss Alps is a Strict Nature Reserve (Category Ia). Swiss National Park 188.JPG
Schweizerischer National Park in the Swiss Alps is a Strict Nature Reserve (Category Ia).
The Jaldapara National Park in West Bengal, India, is a Habitat Management Area (Category IV). Elephant safari.jpg
The Jaldapara National Park in West Bengal, India, is a Habitat Management Area (Category IV).

How to manage areas protected for conservation brings up a range of challenges [5] – whether it be regarding the local population, specific ecosystems or the design of the reserve itself – and because of the many unpredicatable elements in ecology issues, each protected area requires a case-specific set of guidelines. [39]

Enforcing protected area boundaries is a costly and labour-heavy endeavour, particularly if the allocation of a new protected region places new restrictions on the use of resources by the native people which may lead to their subsequent displacement. [40] This has troubled relationships between conservationists and rural communities in many protected regions and is often why many Wildlife Reserves and National Parks face the human threat of poaching for the illegal bushmeat or trophy trades, which are resorted to as an alternative form of substinence. [5] [41] Poaching has thus increased in recent years as areas with certain species are no longer easily and legally accessible. [42] This increasing threat has often led governments to enforce laws and implement new policies in order to adhere to the initial goal of protected areas, though many illegal activities are often overlooked. [43]

There is increasing pressure to take proper account of human needs when setting up protected areas and these sometimes have to be "traded off" against conservation needs. Whereas in the past governments often made decisions about protected areas and informed local people afterwards, today the emphasis is shifting towards greater discussions with stakeholders and joint decisions about how such lands should be set aside and managed. Such negotiations are never easy but usually produce stronger and longer-lasting results for both conservation and people. [44] [45]

Protected areas in many cases are in close cohesion with municipalities and require specific performance management leading both to sustainability from one side and regional development from the other. Administrations of protected areas are more targeted towards the protection of nature and ecosystems while municipalities are responsible for the social and economic development of a particular local community. [46]

In some countries, protected areas can be assigned without the infrastructure and networking needed to substitute consumable resources and subtantiatively protect the area from development or misuse. The soliciting of protected areas may require regulation to the level of meeting demands for food, feed, livestock and fuel, and the legal enforcement of not only the protected area itself but also 'buffer zones' surrounding it, which may help to resist destabilisation. [47]

Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement(PADDD)

Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) events are processes that change the legal status of national parks and other protected areas in both terrestrial and marine environments. [48] [49] Downgrading is a decrease in legal restrictions on human activities within a protected area, downsizing is a decrease in protected area size through a legal boundary change, and degazettement is the loss of legal protection for an entire protected area. [48] Collectively, PADDD represents legal processes that temper regulations, shrink boundaries, or eliminate legal protections originally associated with establishment of a protected area.

Scientific publications have identified 3,749 enacted PADDD events in 73 countries since 1892 which have collectively impacted an area approximately the size of Mexico. [50] PADDD is a historical and contemporary phenomenon. [48] 78% of PADDD events worldwide were enacted since 2000 and governments in at least 14 countries are currently considering at least 46 PADDD proposals. [50] Proximate causes of PADDD vary widely but most PADDD events globally (62%) are related to industrial scale resource extraction and development – infrastructure, industrial agriculture, mining, oil and gas, forestry, fisheries, and industrialization. [50]

PADDD challenges the longstanding assumption that protected areas are permanent fixtures and highlights the need for decision-makers to consider protected area characteristics and the socioeconomic context in which they are situated to better ensure their permanence. [48] [51]

Effectiveness

One main concern regarding protected areas is how effectively they prevent ongoing loss of biodiversity. Multiple case studies point to positive effects on terrestrial and marine species, but the majority of protected areas are unrepresented. Limitations on protected areas include: their small size and isolation from each other (which influence the maintenance of species); their restricted role in preventing the many factors affecting biodiversity, such as climate change, invasive species, and pollution; their high costs; and their increasing conflict with human demands for nature's resources. [5] [52]

Protected areas play a large role in protecting important natural ecosystems and providing essential ecosystem services such as carbon storage and flood prevention. [53] [54] [55]

Besides the focus on ecological effectiveness of conservation activieties, i.e. in how far certain desirable ecological benefits and targets are reached, many studies point out that also cost-effectiveness concerns should play a center role in the design and implementation of conservation activities. [56] [57] In this context, different aspacts such as the type of habitats, [58] species or landscapes selected for conservation, the design of conservation contracts, [59] governance of conservation activities, [60] and payment systems [61] play important roles.

Scientists advocate that 50% of global land and seas be converted to inter-connected protected areas to sustain these benefits. [53] The Asian country Bhutan achieved this high-reaching target by reserving 51.4% of the country's area as protected areas interconnected through biological corridors. [53] Although these networks are well regulated (local communities are aware of their importance and actively contribute to their maintenance), Bhutan is currently a developing country that is undergoing infrastructure development and resource collection. [53] The country's economic progression has brought about human-wildlife conflict and increased pressure on the existence of its protected areas. In light of ongoing disputes on the topic of optimal land usage, Dorji (et al.), in a study using camera traps to detect wildlife activity, summarize the results of a nationwide survey that compares the biodiversity of Bhutan's protected areas versus that of intervening non-protected areas.

The study indicated that Bhutan's protected areas "are effectively conserving medium and large mammal species, as demonstrated through the significant difference in mammal diversity between protected areas, biological corridors, and non-protected areas with the strongest difference between protected areas and non-protected areas". [53] Protected areas had the highest levels of mammal biodiversity. This is made possible by the restriction of commercial activity and regulation of consumptive uses (firewood, timber, etc.). [53] The regulation of such practices has allowed Bhutan's protected areas to thrive with high carnivore diversity and other rare mammals such as Chinese pangolin, Indian pangolin, mountain weasel ( Mustela altaica), small-toothed ferret badger, Asian small clawed otter, the tiger, dhole (Cuon alpinus ), Binturong, clouded leopard and Tibetan fox ( Vulpes ferrilata). [53] Also found to be prevalent were the large herbivore species: Asiatic water buffalo Bubalus arnee, golden langur, musk deer, and Asian elephant. [53] The maintenance of these charismatic megafauna and other threatened species can be attributed to the intensity of Bhutan's management of its protected areas and its local communities’ commitment to preserving them.

By area

Prohibited activities and safety instructions at a state park in Oregon Safety instructions on Lone Ranch Beach.JPG
Prohibited activities and safety instructions at a state park in Oregon

Australia

The National Heritage List is a heritage register, a list of national heritage places deemed to be of outstanding heritage significance to Australia, established in 2003. The list includes natural and historic places, including those of cultural significance to Indigenous Australians. [62] Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) are formed by agreement with Indigenous Australians, and declared by Indigenous Australians, and form a specific class of protected area. [63] [64] [65]

European Union

Kuivajarvi, the Natura 2000 area in Tammela, Tavastia Proper, Finland Venesillanlahtea Kuivajarvella Tammelassa.jpg
Kuivajärvi, the Natura 2000 area in Tammela, Tavastia Proper, Finland

Natura 2000 is a network of protected areas established by the EU across all member states. It is made up of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs) designated respectively under the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive. 787,767 km2 (304,159 sq mi) are designated as terrestrial sites and 251,564 km2 (97,129 sq mi) as marine sites. Overall, 18 percent of the EU land mass is designated. [66]

India

Protected areas of India include National parks, Wildlife sanctuaries, biosphere reserves, reserved and protected forests, conservation and community reserves, communal forests, private protected areas and conservation areas.

Nicaragua

O Parks, Wildlife, and Recreation is a private protected area, also known as a 'Private Reserve' predominantly managed for biodiversity conservation, protected without formal government recognition and is owned and stewarded by the O corporation International. [67] O parks plays a particularly important role in conserving critical biodiversity in a section of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor known as the Paso del Istmo, located along the 12-mile-wide isthmus between Lake Nicaragua and the Pacific Ocean.

United States

As of 31 January 2008, according to the United Nations Environment Programme, the United States had a total of 6770 terrestrial nationally designated (federal) protected areas. These protected areas cover 2,607,131 km2 (1,006,619 sq mi), or 27.08 percent of the land area of the United States. [68] This is also one-tenth of the protected land area of the world.

Russia

On 21 May 2019, The Moscow Times cited a World Wildlife Fund report indicating that Russia now ranks first in the world for its amount of protected natural areas [69] with 63.3 million hectares of specially protected natural areas. However, the article did not contain a link to WWF's report and it may be based on previously gathered data.

China

As an area known for a high level of biodiversity, China has begun implementing various protected areas in recent years. As of the year 2017, China has nearly 10,000 to 12,000 protected areas, 80% of which are nature reserves aiming to foster biodiversity conservation. [70] [19] [71] These newly implemented reserves safeguard a range of ecosystems, from tropical forests to marine habitats. [72] These protected areas encompass nearly 20% of China's land area. [73]

See also

Related Research Articles

International Union for Conservation of Nature International organization

The International Union for Conservation of Nature is an international organization working in the field of nature conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. It is involved in data gathering and analysis, research, field projects, advocacy, and education. IUCN's mission is to "influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable".

This is an index of conservation topics. It is an alphabetical index of articles relating to conservation biology and conservation of the natural environment.

Habitat conservation Management practice for protecting types of environments

Habitat conservation is a management practice that seeks to conserve, protect and restore habitats and prevent species extinction, fragmentation or reduction in range. It is a priority of many groups that cannot be easily characterized in terms of any one ideology.

Wilderness Undisturbed natural environment

Wilderness or wildlands, are natural environments on Earth that have not been significantly modified by human activity or any nonurbanized land not under extensive agricultural cultivation. The term has traditionally referred to terrestrial environments, though growing attention is being placed on marine wilderness. Recent maps of wilderness suggest it covers roughly one quarter of Earth's terrestrial surface, but is being rapidly degraded by human activity. Even less wilderness remains in the ocean, with only 13.2% free from intense human activity.

Marine protected area Protected areas of seas, oceans, estuaries or large lakes

Marine protected areas (MPA) are protected areas of seas, oceans, estuaries or in the US, the Great Lakes. These marine areas can come in many forms ranging from wildlife refuges to research facilities. MPAs restrict human activity for a conservation purpose, typically to protect natural or cultural resources. Such marine resources are protected by local, state, territorial, native, regional, national, or international authorities and differ substantially among and between nations. This variation includes different limitations on development, fishing practices, fishing seasons and catch limits, moorings and bans on removing or disrupting marine life. In some situations, MPAs also provide revenue for countries, potentially equal to the income that they would have if they were to grant companies permissions to fish. The value of MPA to mobile species is unknown.

The UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is a collaboration centre of UN Environment Programme, based in Cambridge in the United Kingdom. UNEP-WCMC has been part of UN Environment Programme since 2000, and has responsibility for biodiversity assessment and support to policy development and implementation. The World Conservation Monitoring Centre was previously an independent organisation jointly managed by IUCN, UN Environment Programme and WWF established in 1988. Prior to that, the centre was a part of the IUCN Secretariat.

Biodiversity action plan

A biodiversity action plan (BAP) is an internationally recognized program addressing threatened species and habitats and is designed to protect and restore biological systems. The original impetus for these plans derives from the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). As of 2009, 191 countries have ratified the CBD, but only a fraction of these have developed substantive BAP documents.

Conservation in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea together with the West Papua region of Indonesia make up a major tropical wilderness area that still contains 5% of the original and untouched tropical high-biodiversity terrestrial ecosystems. PNG in itself contains over 5% of the world's biodiversity in less than 1% of the world's total land area. The flora of New Guinea is unique because it has two sources of origin; the Gondwana flora from the south and flora with Asian origin from the west. As a result, New Guinea shares major family and genera with Australia and the East Asia, but is rich in local endemic species. The endemicity is a result of mountainous isolation, topographic and soil habitat heterogeneity, high forest disturbance rates and abundant aseasonal rainfall year round. PNG boasts some 15–21,000 higher plants, 3,000 species of orchids, 800 species of coral, 600 species of fish, 250 species of mammals and 760 species of birds and 8 species of tree-kangaroos out of which 84 genera of animals are endemic. Ecosystems range from lowland forests to montane forests, alpine flora down to coastal areas which contains some of the most extensive pristine mangrove areas in the world. Much of this biodiversity has remained intact for thousands of years because the ruggedness of the terrain made the interior lands inaccessible; furthermore low population density and restrictions on the effectiveness of traditional tools, ensured that these biodiversity was never overexploited.

Landscape-scale conservation Holistic approach to landscape management

Landscape-scale conservation is a holistic approach to landscape management, aiming to reconcile the competing objectives of nature conservation and economic activities across a given landscape. Landscape-scale conservation may sometimes be attempted because of climate change. It can be seen as an alternative to site based conservation.

World Database on Protected Areas

The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) is the largest assembly of data on the world's terrestrial and marine protected areas, containing more than 260,000 protected areas as of August 2020, with records covering 245 countries and territories throughout the world. The WDPA is a joint venture between the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre and the International Union for Conservation of Nature World Commission on Protected Areas.

Indigenous and community conserved areas (ICCAs), or indigenous peoples’ and community conserved territories and areas, are spaces de facto governed by indigenous peoples or local communities with evidently positive outcomes for the conservation of biological and cultural diversity. In ICCAs, the continuation, revival, or modification of traditional practices and/or new initiatives succeed in protecting and restoring natural resources and cultural values in the face of new threats or opportunities. Some ICCAs are situated in remote ecosystems that have had minimum human influence, while others encompass areas of various regulations and magnitudes within regions strongly affected or modified by human occupation. ICCAs may or may not fit the IUCN definition of “protected area” but, when they do, they can fall into any IUCN protected area categories.

IUCN protected area categories Used to classify protected areas in a system developed by the IUCN

IUCN protected area categories, or IUCN protected area management categories, are categories used to classify protected areas in a system developed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

Strict nature reserve Highest category of protected area recognised by the WCPA

A strict nature reserve or wilderness area is the highest category of protected area recognised by the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), a body which is part of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). These category I areas are the most stringently protected natural landscapes.

A sacred natural site is a natural feature or a large area of land or water having special spiritual significance to peoples and communities. Sacred natural sites consist of all types of natural features including mountains, hills, forests, groves, trees, rivers, lakes, lagoons, caves, islands and springs.

Conservation is a positive endeavour including “… the preservation, maintenance, sustainable use, restoration, and enhancement of the natural environment”.

Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) events are processes that change the legal status of national parks and other protected areas in both terrestrial and marine environments. "Downgrading" is "a decrease in legal restrictions on the number, magnitude, or extent of human activities within a protected area ." "Downsizing" refers to a "decrease in size of a protected area as a result of excision of land or sea area through a legal boundary change." "Degazettement" is defined as a loss of legal protection for an entire national park or other protected area. Collectively, PADDD represents legal processes that temper regulations, shrink boundaries, or eliminate legal protections originally associated with establishment of a protected area.

The marine protected areas of South Africa are in an area of coastline or ocean within the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the Republic of South Africa that is protected in terms of specific legislation for the benefit of the environment and the people who live in and use it. An MPA is a place where marine life can thrive under less pressure than unprotected areas. They are like underwater parks, and this healthy environment can benefit neighbouring areas.

Sustainable Development Goal 15 15th of 17 Sustainable Development Goals to protect life on land

Sustainable Development Goal 15 is about "Life on land." One of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations in 2015, the official wording is: "Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss". The Goal has 12 targets to be achieved by 2030. Progress towards targets will be measured by 14 indicators.

The Rocherpan Marine Protected Area is a small coastal conservation region on the West Coast of the Western Cape province, in the territorial waters of South Africa. It is about 25 km north of Velddrif on the road to Elands Bay, north of Dwarskersbos.

References

  1. Lele, Sharachchandra; Wilshusen, Peter; Brockington, Dan; Seidler, Reinmar; Bawa, Kamaljit (1 May 2010). "Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics". Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2 (1): 94–100. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.006. ISSN   1877-3435.
  2. "Protected Planet". Archived from the original on 8 March 2015.
  3. Soutullo, Alvaro (2010). "Extent of the Global Network of Terrestrial Protected Areas". Conservation Biology. 24 (2): 362–363. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01465.x. ISSN   1523-1739. PMID   20491846. S2CID   32390446.
  4. "unstats - Millennium Indicators". Archived from the original on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2018.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Mora C, Sale P (2011). "Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: A review of the technical and practical shortcoming of protected areas on land and sea" (PDF). Marine Ecology Progress Series. 434: 251–266. Bibcode:2011MEPS..434..251M. doi: 10.3354/meps09214 .
  6. 1 2 3 "Protected Planet Report 2016" (PDF). UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Retrieved 7 February 2020.
  7. "Sign the 30x30 Petition Today!". Campaign for Nature.
  8. "G7 commits to end support for coal-fired power stations this year". euronews. 21 May 2021.
  9. Dudley, N. (ed.) Guidelines for Applying Protected Areas Management Categories (IUCN: Switzerland, 2008)
  10. "About". IUCN. 10 September 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  11. "Guidelines for Applying the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories to Marine Protected Areas" (PDF).{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. 1 2 3 4 Borrini-Feyerabend, G., N. Dudley, T. Jaeger, B. Lassen, N. Pathak Broome, A. Phillips and T. Sandwith (2013). Governance of Protected Areas. From understanding to action (PDF). IUCN. ISBN   978-2-8317-1608-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. "Biodiversity A-Z". www.biodiversitya-z.org.
  14. Campbell, A., Miles. L., Lysenko, I., Hughes, A., Gibbs, H. Carbon Storage in Protected Areas: Technical Report (UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 2008)
  15. Coad L., Burgess, N.D., Bomhard, B., and Besancon, C. Progress on the Convention on Biological Diversity's 2010 and 2012 Targets for Protected Area Coverage "Looking to the Future of the CBD Programme of Work on Protected Areas" (Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, 2009)
  16. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D., Bomhard, B., Fitzgerald, C. & Blyth, S. How much of the world's mountain area is protected? (Cambridge, UNEP-WCMC, 2009)
  17. Bomhard, B., Butchart, S., Tracking Progress Towards the CBD's Targets for Protected Area Coverage and Management Effectiveness (UNEP-WCMC & BirdLife International, 2010)
  18. Benetti, Stefania; Langemeyer, Johannes (2021). "Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy". Ecosystems and People (Abingdon, England). 17 (1): 411–431. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155. ISSN   2639-5908. PMC   8315210 . PMID   34382004.
  19. 1 2 Xu, Weihua; Xiao, Yi; Zhang, Jingjing; Yang, Wu; Zhang, Lu; Hull, Vanessa; Wang, Zhi; Zheng, Hua; Liu, Jianguo; Polasky, Stephen; Jiang, Ling (14 February 2017). "Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (7): 1601–1606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620503114 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   5321011 . PMID   28137858.
  20. "Ecosystem Services". National Wildlife Federation. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
  21. 1 2 "More About Ecosystem Services". www.fs.fed.us. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
  22. "Protecting ecosystems brings benefits to society". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
  23. "IUCN – Home". 8 June 2016.
  24. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories, Published October, 2008 Archived 4 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  25. Mongolia Sacred Mountains: Bogd Khan, Burkhan Khaldun, Otgon Tenger
  26. "Yellowstone – Protected Planet".
  27. Centre, UNESCO World Heritage. "Tobago Main Ridge Forest Reserve". UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
  28. Phillips, A. A Short History of the International System of Protected Area Management Categories (WCPA Task Force on Protected Area Categories, 2007)
  29. Uekötter, Frank (9 March 2020). "Eine kleine Geschichte des Artenschutzes". Zeitschrift der Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung (in German). bpb. 11/2020: 15.
  30. "IUCN – Home". October 2008. Archived from the original on 19 March 2012. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  31. "The Worlds Protected Areas". archive.is. 1 August 2012. Archived from the original on 1 August 2012. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  32. Protected Areas (Articles 8 (a) to (e)), Doc UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/VII/28 (20 February 2004) at para 18.
  33. Strategic Plan: Future Evaluation of Progress, Doc UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/VII/30 Annex (13 April 2004), Aichi Biodiversity Target 11. Among the twenty-one subsidiary targets, the first two were: “1.1 At least 10% of each of the world’s ecological regions effectively conserved” and “1.2 Areas of particular importance to biodiversity protected.” See also Stephen Woodley et al, “Meeting Aichi Target 11: What Does Success Look Like for Protected Area Systems?” (2012) 18(1) Parks 23.
  34. CBD (2018). Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (Decision 14/8). https://www.cbd.int/ doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf
  35. Jonas H.D., MacKinnon K., Dudley N., Hockings M., Jessen S., Laffoley D., MacKinnon D., Matallana-Tobon C., Sandwith T., Waithaka J., and S. Woodley, 2018. “Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures: From Aichi Target 11 to the Post-2020 Biodiversity Framework.” PARKS
  36. IISD (14 March 2022).UN Biodiversity Conference (CBD COP 15) (Part 2). International Institute for Sustainable Development. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
  37. "Schweizerischer Nationalpark – Protected Planet".
  38. "Jaldapara – Protected Planet".
  39. Hermoso, Virgilio; Abell, Robin; Linke, Simon; Boon, Philip (2016). "The role of protected areas for freshwater biodiversity conservation: challenges and opportunities in a rapidly changing world". Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 26 (S1): 3–11. doi:10.1002/aqc.2681.
  40. "for Conservation: A Global Overview, Dan Brockington and Jim Igoe. Accessed: 18 April 2011".
  41. "BBC News: A Battle for DR Congo's Wildlife".
  42. Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "Poachers target endangered animals in protected areas, study finds | DW | 18.04.2017". DW.COM. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
  43. "Wildlife Trafficking". www.justice.gov. 13 April 2015. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
  44. "About Protected Areas". archive.is. 16 April 2013. Archived from the original on 16 April 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  45. Pringle, Robert M. (2017). "Upgrading protected areas to conserve wild biodiversity". Nature. 546 (7656): 91–99. Bibcode:2017Natur.546...91P. doi:10.1038/nature22902. PMID   28569807. S2CID   4387383.
  46. "– Burksiene, V. Dvorak, J. (2020). Performance Management in Protected Areas: Localizing Governance of the Curonian Spit National Park, Lithuania. Public Administration Issues, no 5, pp. 105–124" (PDF).
  47. "Middle East's investments in African farmlands are rooted in food security fears". farmlandgrab.org.
  48. 1 2 3 4 Mascia, Michael B.; Pailler, Sharon (2011). "Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement (PADDD) and Its Conservation Implications". Conservation Letters. 4 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00147.x. S2CID   54722277.
  49. Roberts, Kelsey E.; et al. (2018). "Measuring progress in marine protection: A new set of metrics to evaluate the strength of marine protected area networks". Biological Conservation. 219: 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.004.
  50. 1 2 3 Golden Kroner, Rachel E.; et al. (2019). "The uncertain future of protected lands and waters". Science. 364 (6443): 881–886. Bibcode:2019Sci...364..881G. doi: 10.1126/science.aau5525 . PMID   31147519. S2CID   171092917.
  51. Symes, William S.; et al. (2016). "Why do we lose protected areas? Factors influencing protected area downgrading, downsizing and degazettement in the tropics and subtropics". Global Change Biology. 22 (2): 656–665. Bibcode:2016GCBio..22..656S. doi:10.1111/gcb.13089. PMID   26367139.
  52. Regos, Adrian; D'Amen, M; Titeux, Nicolas; Herrando, S; Guisan, A; Brotons, Lluis (2016). "Predicting the future effectiveness of protected areas for bird conservation in Mediterranean ecosystems under climate change and novel fire regime scenarios" (PDF). Diversity and Distributions. 22 (1): 83–96. doi:10.1111/ddi.12375. S2CID   53593929.
  53. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dorji, Sangay; Rajaratnam, Rajanathan; Vernes, Karl (1 October 2019). "Mammal richness and diversity in a Himalayan hotspot: the role of protected areas in conserving Bhutan's mammals". Biodiversity and Conservation. 28 (12): 3277–3297. doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01821-9. ISSN   1572-9710. S2CID   199370519.
  54. Yu, E.; Cui, N.; Quan, Y.; Wang, C.; Jia, T.; Wu, D.; Wu, G. (16 November 2020). "Ecological protection for natural protected areas based on landsenses ecology: a case study of Dalinor National Nature Reserve". International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 27 (8): 709–717. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1727585. ISSN   1350-4509. S2CID   212891641.
  55. Weston, Phoebe (8 March 2021). "Land could be worth more left to nature than when farmed, study finds". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 March 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  56. Ansell, Dean; Freudenberger, David; Munro, Nicola; Gibbons, Philip (June 2016). "The cost-effectiveness of agri-environment schemes for biodiversity conservation: A quantitative review". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 225: 184–191. doi:10.1016/J.AGEE.2016.04.008.
  57. Ferraro, Paul J; Pattanayak, Subhrendu K (11 April 2006). "Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments". PLOS Biology. 4 (4): e105. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105. PMC   1435411 . PMID   16602825.
  58. Petersen, Anders Højgård; Strange, Niels; Anthon, Signe; Bjørner, Thomas Bue; Rahbek, Carsten (February 2016). "Conserving what, where and how? Cost-efficient measures to conserve biodiversity in Denmark". Journal for Nature Conservation. 29: 33–44. doi:10.1016/J.JNC.2015.10.004.
  59. Schöttker, Oliver; Santos, Maria João (November 2019). "Easement or public land? An economic analysis of different ownership modes for nature conservation measures in California". Conservation Letters. 12 (6). doi:10.1111/conl.12647. S2CID   145952617.
  60. Schöttker, Oliver; Johst, Karin; Drechsler, Martin; Wätzold, Frank (September 2016). "Land for biodiversity conservation — To buy or borrow?". Ecological Economics. 129: 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.011.
  61. Drechsler, Martin; Johst, Karin; Wätzold, Frank (March 2017). "The cost-effective length of contracts for payments to compensate land owners for biodiversity conservation measures". Biological Conservation. 207: 72–79. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.01.014.
  62. "Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Section 324A". Australasian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 28 June 2015.
  63. "Fact Sheets: Indigenous Protected Areas". Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 7 December 2007. Archived from the original on 23 July 2008. Retrieved 22 September 2012.
  64. "Department of the Environment and Energy". Department of the Environment and Energy. Retrieved 16 August 2018.
  65. Davidson, Helen (27 April 2018). "Indigenous rangers to receive $250m in funding for jobs until 2021". the Guardian. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  66. "Natura 2000 Barometer - Environment - European Commission". ec.europa.eu.
  67. "Account Suspended". opwr.org.
  68. "Summary of protection by Country and Territory on the 31st January 2008". UNEP. World Database on Protected Areas. 31 January 2008. Archived from the original (XLS) on 13 July 2009. Retrieved 13 April 2009.
  69. "Russia Has Most Protected Natural Areas in the World, WWF Says". The Moscow Times. Retrieved 21 May 2019.
  70. Hayes, Shelley; Egli, Daniel (26 May 2022). "Directory of Protected Areas in East Asia" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  71. "Is China stepping up its nature conservation?". China Dialogue. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
  72. Bohorquez, John J.; Xue, Guifang; Frankstone, Timothy; Grima, Maria M.; Kleinhaus, Karine; Zhao, Yiyi; Pikitch, Ellen K. (12 November 2021). "China's little-known efforts to protect its marine ecosystems safeguard some habitats but omit others". Science Advances. 7 (46): eabj1569. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj1569. ISSN   2375-2548. PMC   8589307 . PMID   34767454.
  73. Xu, Weihua; Pimm, Stuart L.; Du, Ao; Su, Yang; Fan, Xinyue; An, Li; Liu, Jianguo; Ouyang, Zhiyun (1 September 2019). "Transforming Protected Area Management in China". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 34 (9): 762–766. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.05.009. ISSN   0169-5347. PMID   31301875. S2CID   196613762.