Court of Justice of the European Union General Court | |
---|---|
Established | 1989 |
Jurisdiction | European Union and Northern Ireland [lower-alpha 1] |
Location | Palais de la Cour de Justice, Kirchberg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg |
Authorized by | Treaties of the European Union |
Appeals to | European Court of Justice |
Number of positions | 54 judges (2 per member state) 5 vacant |
Website | curia.europa.eu |
President | |
Currently | Marc van der Woude |
Since | 27 September 2019 |
Vice-President | |
Currently | Savvas Papasavvas |
Since | 27 September 2019 |
Registrar | |
Currently | Vittorio Di Bucci |
Since | 5 June 2023 |
Division map | |
This article is part of a series on |
European Unionportal |
The General Court, informally known as the European General Court (EGC), is a constituent court of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It hears actions taken against the institutions of the European Union by individuals and member states, although certain matters are reserved for the European Court of Justice. Decisions of the General Court can be appealed to the Court of Justice, but only on a point of law. Prior to the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009, it was known as the Court of First Instance.
The General Court hears disputes (such as those by persons who have been refused a trade mark by EUIPO, the EU Trade Mark and designs registry).
The creation of the General Court instituted a judicial system based on two levels of jurisdiction: all cases heard at first instance by the General Court may be subject to a right of appeal to the Court of Justice on points of law only.
In view of the increasing number of cases brought before the General Court in the last five years, to relieve it of some of the caseload, the Treaty of Nice, which entered into force on 1 February 2003, provides for the creation of 'judicial panels' in certain specific areas.
On 2 November 2004 the Council adopted a decision establishing the European Union Civil Service Tribunal. This new specialised tribunal, composed of seven judges, heard and determined at first instance disputes involving the European Civil Service. Its decisions were subject to a right of appeal before the General Court on points of law only. Decisions given by the General Court in this area might exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice. The European Union Civil Service Tribunal was duly constituted into law on 2 December 2005. Despite the success in its mandate, [2] it was dissolved on 1 September 2016, [3] leading to the doubling of the number of judges at the General Court. [3]
Since February 2020 the General Court is composed of 54 Judges; this follows a 2016 reform which increased the number of judges to two per member state by 2019, and the departure of the UK from the EU at the end of January 2020. The Judges are appointed for a renewable term of six years by common accord of the governments of the Member States. As of February 2020 [update] , there are 49 Judges in post: 23 member states have nominated both their judges, whilst Latvia, Poland, and Slovakia have nominated just one, and Slovenia has nominated neither.
The members of the General Court elect their president and the presidents of the Chambers of five Judges from among their number for a renewable period of three years.
There are no permanent Advocates General attached to the General Court (unlike the European Court of Justice, which has eleven Advocates General). However, the task of an Advocate General may be performed in a limited number of cases by a Judge nominated to do so. In practice this has been done occasionally.
Elected | Term ended | Judge |
---|---|---|
25 September 1989 | 18 September 1995 | José Luís da Cruz Vilaça |
18 September 1995 | 4 March 1998 | Antonio Saggio |
4 March 1998 | 17 September 2007 | Bo Vesterdorf |
17 September 2007 | 26 September 2019 | Marc Jaeger |
27 September 2019 | Incumbent | Marc van der Woude |
Elected | Term ended | Judge |
---|---|---|
17 September 2013 | 19 September 2016 | Heikki Kanninen |
20 September 2016 | 26 September 2019 | Marc van der Woude |
27 September 2019 | Incumbent | Savvas Papasavvas |
Name | Country | Elected | Current term ends | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|
Viktor Kreuschitz | Austria | 2013 | 2022 | |
Gerhard Hesse | Austria | 2019 | 2022 | |
Paul Nihoul | Belgium | 2016 | 2022 | |
Geert De Baere | Belgium | 2017 | 2022 | |
Mariyana Kancheva | Bulgaria | 2011 | 2025 [4] | |
Alexander Kornezov | Bulgaria | 2016 | 2025 [4] | President of the Tenth Chamber |
Vesna Tomljenović | Croatia | 2013 | 2025 [5] | President of the Second Chamber |
Tamara Perišin | Croatia | 2019 | 2025 [5] | |
Savvas Papasavvas | Cyprus | 2004 | 2022 | Vice-President of the General Court (2019–2022) |
Anna Marcoulli | Cyprus | 2016 | 2022 | President of the Sixth Chamber |
Petra Škvařilová-Pelzl | Czech Republic | 2019 | 2025 | |
David Petrlík | Czech Republic | 2021 | 2025 | |
Sten Frimodt Nielsen | Denmark | 2007 | 2022 | |
Jesper Svenningsen | Denmark | 2016 | 2022 | President of the Eighth Chamber |
Lauri Madise | Estonia | 2013 | 2022 | |
Iko Nõmm | Estonia | 2019 [5] | 2022 [5] | |
Heikki Kanninen | Finland | 2009 | 2022 | President of the First Chamber Vice-President of the General Court (2013–2016) |
Tuula Pynnä | Finland | 2019 [5] | 2022 [5] | |
Stéphane Gervasoni | France | 2013 | 2025 [4] | President of the Fourth Chamber |
Laurent Truchot | France | 2019 [4] | 2025 [4] | Judge (2007–2013) |
Johannes Laitenberger | Germany | 2019 | 2025 | |
Gabriele Steinfatt | Germany | 2019 | 2025 [5] | |
Dimitris Gratsias | Greece | 2010 | 2022 | |
Constantinos Iliopoulos | Greece | 2016 | 2022 | |
TBA | Hungary | |||
Zoltán Csehi | Hungary | 2016 | 2022 | |
Suzanne Kingston | Ireland | 2021 | 2025 [6] | |
Colm Mac Eochaidh | Ireland | 2017 | 2025 [5] | |
Roberto Mastroianni | Italy | 2019 | 2025 | |
Ornella Porchia | Italy | 2019 | 2025 | |
TBA | Latvia | |||
Inga Reine | Latvia | 2016 | 2025 [4] | |
Rimvydas Norkus | Lithuania | 2019 | 2025 | |
Virgilijus Valančius | Lithuania | 2016 | 2019* | |
Marc Jaeger | Luxembourg | 1996 | 2022 | President of the General Court (2007–2019) |
Dean Spielmann | Luxembourg | 2016 | 2022 | President of the Fifth Chamber |
Eugène Buttigieg | Malta | 2012 | 2025 | |
Ramona Frendo | Malta | 2019 | 2025 | |
Marc van der Woude | Netherlands | 2010 | 2022 | President of the General Court (2019–2022) Vice-President of the General Court (2016–2019) |
René Barents | Netherlands | 2016 | 2022 | |
Krystyna Kowalik-Bańczyk | Poland | 2016 | 2022 | |
Nina Półtorak | Poland | 2016 | 2016* | |
Ion Gâlea | Romania | 2021 | 2022 | |
Mirela Stancu | Romania | 2019 [4] | 2022 [4] | |
Ricardo Da Silva Passos | Portugal | 2016 | 2022 | President of the Seventh Chamber |
Maria José Costeira | Portugal | 2016 | 2022 | President of the Ninth Chamber |
Juraj Schwarcz | Slovakia | 2009 | 2022 | |
TBA | Slovakia | |||
Maja Brkan | Slovenia | 2021 | 2025 [7] | |
Damjan Kukovec | Slovenia | TBA | ||
José Martín y Pérez de Nanclares | Spain | 2019 | 2025 | |
Miguel Sampol Pucurull | Spain | 2019 | 2025 | |
Ulf Christophe Öberg | Sweden | 2016 | 2025 [4] | |
Fredrik Schalin | Sweden | 2016 | 2025 [4] |
* Judge continues to hold the office until their successor takes up the duties according to the Article 5(3) of the Protocol No. 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the EU
Name | Country | Elected | Term ended | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Josef Azizi | Austria | 19 January 1995 | 16 September 2013 | [8] |
Koen Lenaerts | Belgium | 25 September 1989 | 6 October 2003 | [9] |
Franklin Dehousse | Belgium | 6 October 2003 | 19 September 2016 | [9] |
Teodor Tchipev | Bulgaria | 12 January 2007 | 29 June 2010 | [10] |
Irena Pelikánová | Czech Republic | 12 May 2004 | 26 September 2019 | [9] |
Jan M. Passer | Czech Republic | 19 September 2016 | 6 October 2020 | [11] |
Bo Versterdorf | Denmark | 25 September 1989 | 17 September 2007 | [9] |
Küllike Jürimäe | Estonia | 12 May 2004 | 23 October 2013 | [9] |
Virpi Tiili | Finland | 8 January 1995 | 6 October 2009 | [9] |
Jacques Biancarelli | France | 25 September 1989 | 18 September 1995 | [9] |
André Potocki | France | 18 September 1995 | 19 September 2001 | [9] |
Hubert Legal | France | 19 September 2001 | 17 September 2007 | [9] |
Heinrich Kirschner | Germany | 25 September 1989 | 6 February 1997 | [9] |
Jörg Pirrung | Germany | 11 June 1997 | 17 September 2007 | [9] |
Alfred Dittrich | Germany | 17 September 2007 | 26 September 2019 | [9] |
Christos G. Yeraris | Greece | 25 September 1989 | 18 September 1992 | [9] |
Andreas Kalogerpoulos | Greece | 18 September 1992 | 17 September 1998 | [9] |
Michail Vilaras | Greece | 17 September 1998 | 25 October 2010 | [9] |
Ottó Czúcz | Hungary | 12 May 2004 | 19 September 2016 | [9] |
Barna Berke | Hungary | 19 September 2016 | 2 August 2021 | [12] |
Donal Barrington | Ireland | 25 September 1989 | 10 January 1996 | [9] |
John Cooke | Ireland | 10 January 1996 | 15 September 2008 | [9] |
Kevin O'Higgins | Ireland | 15 September 2008 | 16 September 2013 | [9] |
Anthony M. Collins | Ireland | 16 September 2013 [13] | 7 October 2021 [14] | |
Antonio Saggio | Italy | 25 September 1989 | 4 March 1998 | [9] |
Paolo Mengozzi | Italy | 4 March 1998 | 3 May 2006 | [9] |
Enzo Moavero Milanesi | Italy | 3 May 2006 | 15 November 2011 | [9] |
Guido Berardis | Italy | 17 September 2012 | 31 August 2019 | [9] |
Ezio Perillo | Italy | 19 September 2016 | 26 September 2019 | [9] |
Ingrida Labucka | Latvia | 12 May 2004 | 25 February 2020 | |
Vilenas Vadapalas | Lithuania | 12 May 2004 | 16 September 2013 | [9] |
Egidijus Bieliūnas | Lithuania | 16 September 2013 | 26 September 2019 | [9] |
Romain Schintgen | Luxembourg | 25 September 1989 | 11 July 1996 | [9] |
Ena Cremona | Malta | 12 May 2004 | 22 March 2012 | [10] |
Peter George Xuereb | Malta | 6 June 2016 | 8 October 2018 | [9] |
Cornelis Paulus Briët | Netherlands | 25 September 1989 | 17 September 1998 | [9] |
Arjen Meij | Netherlands | 17 September 1998 | 13 September 2010 | [10] |
Irena Wiszniewska-Bialecka | Poland | 15 May 2004 | 19 September 2016 | [8] |
Nina Półtorak | Poland | 13 April 2016 | 31 August 2016 | [8] |
José Luis Da Cruz Vilaça | Portugal | 25 September 1989 | 18 September 1995 | [8] |
Rui Manuel Gens De Moura Ramos | Portugal | 19 September 1995 | 31 March 2003 | [8] |
Maria Eguénia Martins De Nazaré Ribeiro | Portugal | 31 March 2003 | 19 September 2016 | [8] |
Valeriu M. Ciuca | Romania | 12 January 2007 | 26 November 2010 | [10] |
Andrei Popescu | Romania | 26 November 2010 | 19 September 2016 | [8] |
Octavia Spineanu-Matei | Romania | 19 September 2016 | 7 October 2021 | [10] |
Daniel Šváby | Slovakia | 21 May 2004 | 6 October 2010 | [10] |
Verica Trstenjak | Slovenia | 7 July 2004 | 6 October 2006 | [8] |
Miro Prek | Slovenia | 6 October 2006 | 26 September 2019 | [8] |
Rafael Garcia-Valdecasas Y Fernández | Spain | 25 September 1989 | 17 September 2007 | [9] |
Santiago Soldevila Fragoso | Spain | 17 September 2007 | 16 September 2013 | [9] |
Ignacio Ulloa Rubio | Spain | 16 September 2013 | 26 September 2019 | [9] |
Leopoldo Calvo-Sotelo Ibáñez-Martín | Spain | 13 April 2016 | 26 September 2019 | [9] |
Pernilla Lindh | Sweden | 18 January 1995 | 6 October 2006 | [8] |
Nils Wahl | Sweden | 6 October 2006 | 28 November 2012 | [8] |
Carl Wetter | Sweden | 18 March 2013 | 19 September 2016 | [8] |
Former Member State | ||||
David A. O. Edward | United Kingdom | 25 September 1989 | 10 March 1992 | [8] |
Christopher William Bellamy | United Kingdom | 10 March 1992 | 15 December 1999 | [8] |
Nicholas James Forwood | United Kingdom | 15 December 1999 | 7 October 2015 | [8] |
Ian Stewart Forrester | United Kingdom | 1 October 2015 | 31 January 2020 | |
Elected | Term ended | Judge |
---|---|---|
27 September 1989 | 6 October 2005 | Hans Jung |
6 October 2005 | 30 April 2023 | Emmanuel Coulon |
5 June 2023 | Incumbent | Vittorio Di Bucci |
The General Court, like the Court of Justice, has the task of ensuring that the law is observed in the interpretation and application of the Treaties of the European Union and the provisions adopted by the competent Union institutions.
To fulfil its main task, the General Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance all direct actions brought by individuals and the Member States, with the exception of those to be assigned to a 'judicial panel' and those reserved for the Court of Justice.
(against acts of the Union institutions)
(against inaction by the Union institutions)
(for the reparation of damage caused by unlawful conduct on the part of a Union institution)
(disputes concerning contracts in public or private law entered into by the Union, containing such a clause)
Subject-matter of direct actions: all matters, including:
The General Court has its own Rules of Procedure. The 1991 rules were replaced by revised Rules of Procedure which came into effect on 1 July 2015. [15] In the main, the Court's procedure includes a written phase and an oral phase. The proceedings are conducted in a language at the petitioner's choosing. As in the European Court of Justice, the working language of the Court is nevertheless French, and this includes the language the judges deliberate in and the drafting language of preliminary reports and judgments. [16]
The Court is separated into 9 divisions (called ‘chambers’) sat by 3-judge benches, except for the 7th division whose bench is sat by 4 judges. Each chamber has an extended composition of 5 judges. Cases are assigned by the President of the Court to a relevant divisional presiding judge. The presiding judge assigned to the case then chooses a judge-reporter (judge-rapporteur) from the judges of the division, whose clerks write a preliminary report (rapport préalable) based on the parties' pleadings and applicable law.
At the close of the written phase and, as the case may be, on adoption of measures of inquiry, the case is argued orally in open court. The proceedings are interpreted simultaneously, if necessary, into various official languages of the European Union. The judges then deliberate based on a draft judgment prepared by the judge-reporter. The Court's final judgment is handed down in open court.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ), formally just the Court of Justice, is the supreme court of the European Union in matters of European Union law. As a part of the Court of Justice of the European Union, it is tasked with interpreting EU law and ensuring its uniform application across all EU member states under Article 263 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
The Court of Cassation is the supreme court for civil and criminal cases in France. It is one of the country's four apex courts, along with the Council of State, the Constitutional Council and the Jurisdictional Disputes Tribunal.
An ecclesiastical court, also called court Christian or court spiritual, is any of certain courts having jurisdiction mainly in spiritual or religious matters. In the Middle Ages, these courts had much wider powers in many areas of Europe than before the development of nation states. They were experts in interpreting canon law, a basis of which was the Corpus Juris Civilis of Justinian, which is considered the source of the civil law legal tradition.
A tribunal, generally, is any person or institution with authority to judge, adjudicate on, or determine claims or disputes—whether or not it is called a tribunal in its title. For example, an advocate who appears before a court with a single judge could describe that judge as "their tribunal." Many governmental bodies are titled "tribunals" to emphasize that they are not courts of normal jurisdiction. For example, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was a body specially constituted under international law; in Great Britain, employment tribunals are bodies set up to hear specific employment disputes. In many cases, the word tribunal implies a judicial body with a lesser degree of formality than a court, in which the normal rules of evidence and procedure may not apply, and whose presiding officers are frequently neither judges nor magistrates. Private judicial bodies are also often styled "tribunals." The word tribunal, however, is not conclusive of a body's function—for example, in Great Britain, the Employment Appeal Tribunal is a superior court of record.
Small-claims courts have limited jurisdiction to hear civil cases between private litigants. Courts authorized to try small claims may also have other judicial functions, and go by different names in different jurisdictions. For example, it may be known as a county or magistrate's court. These courts can be found in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England and Wales, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Greece, New Zealand, Philippines, Scotland, Singapore, South Africa, Nigeria and the United States.
France's independent court system enjoys special statutory protection from the executive branch. Procedures for the appointment, promotion, and removal of judges vary depending on whether it is for the ordinary or the administrative stream. Judicial appointments in the judicial stream must be approved by a special panel, the High Council of the Judiciary. Once appointed, career judges serve for life and cannot be removed without specific disciplinary proceedings conducted before the council with due process.
The courts of Scotland are responsible for administration of justice in Scotland, under statutory, common law and equitable provisions within Scots law. The courts are presided over by the judiciary of Scotland, who are the various judicial office holders responsible for issuing judgments, ensuring fair trials, and deciding on sentencing. The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland, subject to appeals to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, and the High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court, which is only subject to the authority of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on devolution issues and human rights compatibility issues.
The judicial system of Turkey is defined by Articles 138 to 160 of the Constitution of Turkey.
The European Union Civil Service Tribunal was a specialised court within the Court of Justice of the European Union. It was established on 2 December 2005. It ceased to exist on 1 September 2016.
In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.
In France, the Tribunal d'instance is a judicial lower court of record of first instance for general civil suits and includes a criminal division, the Police Court, which hears cases of misdemeanors or summary offences (contraventions). Since it has original jurisdiction, the Court's rulings may be appealed to a French appellate court or Supreme Court. The court was formerly known as a Justice of the Peace Court until the judicial restructuring of 1958.
A preliminary ruling is a decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the interpretation of European Union law that is given in response to a request from a court or a tribunal of a member state. A preliminary ruling is a final determination of European Union law, with no scope for appeal. The ECJ hands down its decision to the referring court, which is then obliged to implement the ruling.
The judicial system of Sweden consists of the law of Sweden and a number of government agencies tasked with upholding security and rule of law within the country. The activities of these agencies include police and law enforcement, prosecution, courts, and prisons and other correctional services.
Rosario Silva de Lapuerta is a Spanish jurist who served as a judge at the European Court of Justice (CJEU) between 7 October 2003 and 7 October 2021 and since 9 October 2018 as a Vice-President of the CJEU.
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is the judicial branch of the European Union (EU). Seated in the Kirchberg quarter of Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, this EU institution consists of two separate courts: the Court of Justice and the General Court. From 2005 to 2016, it also contained the Civil Service Tribunal. It has a sui generis court system, meaning 'of its own kind', and is a supranational institution.
Scots law is the legal system of Scotland. It is a hybrid or mixed legal system containing civil law and common law elements, that traces its roots to a number of different historical sources. Together with English law and Northern Ireland law, it is one of the three legal systems of the United Kingdom. Scots law recognises four sources of law: legislation, legal precedent, specific academic writings, and custom. Legislation affecting Scotland and Scots law is passed by the Scottish Parliament on all areas of devolved responsibility, and the United Kingdom Parliament on reserved matters. Some legislation passed by the pre-1707 Parliament of Scotland is still also valid.
The judiciary of Poland are the authorities exercising the judicial power of the Polish state on the basis of Chapter 8 of the Constitution of Poland. As in almost all countries of continental Europe, the Polish judiciary operates within the framework of civil law.
The judiciary of Belgium is similar to the French judiciary. Belgium evolved from a unitary to a federal state, but its judicial system has not been adapted to a federal system.
The Judiciary of Sri Lanka are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in Sri Lanka. The Constitution of Sri Lanka defines courts as independent institutions within the traditional framework of checks and balances. They apply Sri Lankan Law which is an amalgam of English common law, Roman-Dutch civil law and Customary Law; and are established under the Judicature Act No 02 of 1978 of the Parliament of Sri Lanka.
The law of Cyprus is a legal system which applies within the Republic of Cyprus. Although Cypriot law is extensively codified, it is still heavily based on English common law in the sense that the fundamental principle of precedent applies.
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations .(July 2009) |
The Protocol will also confer full jurisdiction on the CJEU to oversee the operation of EU law applying to Northern Ireland in relation to customs and the movement of goods, technical regulations, VAT and excise, the Single Electricity Market and State aid; including the jurisdiction to hear applications for preliminary rulings submitted by the courts of Northern Ireland. The UK will have the right to participate in these proceedings as if it were a Member State.